Safety and Efficacy of High Power Shorter Duration Ablation Guided by Ablation Index or Lesion Size Index in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Table 3

Quality assessment of the included studies according to the Newcastle–Ottawa scale or Cochrane Collaboration tool for assessing risk of bias.

Study	Representativeness of the exposed cohort	Selection of the nonexposed cohort	Ascertainment of exposure	Demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at start of the study	Comparability of cohorts on the basis of the design or analysis	Assessment of outcome	Was follow‐up long enough for outcomes to occur	Adequacy of follow-up of cohorts	Total stars
Kaneshiro et al. [19]			—				—		6
Berte et al. [17]									9
Okamatsu et al. [12]									9
Castrejon-Castrejon et al. [18]				—					7
Kyriakopoulou et al. [13]			—						8
Dhillon et al. [10]			—						8
Study	Random sequence generation	Allocation concealment	Blinding of participants and personnel	Blinding of outcome assessment	Incomplete outcome data	Selective reporting	Other bias
Leo et al. [11]	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Low risk	Unclear risk	Unclear risk