Robustness Comparison of Emerging Devices for Portable Applications

<table>“<svg height="16.375" id="M84" style="vertical-align:-4.77652pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 17.049999 16.375" width="17.049999" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
<g transform="matrix(1.25,0,0,-1.25,0,16.375)">
<g transform="translate(72,-58.9)">
<text transform="matrix(1,0,0,-1,-71.95,63.71)">
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="0" y="0">𝐶</tspan>
</text>
<text transform="matrix(1,0,0,-1,-63.56,60.58)">
<tspan style="font-size: 8.75px; " x="0" y="0">𝑔</tspan>
</text>
</g>
</g>
</svg>” and “<svg height="10.725" id="M85" style="vertical-align:-0.1254pt" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 11.375 10.725" width="11.375" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
<g transform="matrix(1.25,0,0,-1.25,0,10.725)">
<g transform="translate(72,-63.42)">
<text transform="matrix(1,0,0,-1,-71.95,63.6)">
<tspan style="font-size: 12.50px; " x="0" y="0">𝑆</tspan>
</text>
</g>
</g>
</svg>” as a function of pitch and number of tubes.</table>

Journal of Nanomaterials

Robustness Comparison of Emerging Devices for Portable Applications

Figure 4