Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Nanomaterials
Volume 2012, Article ID 575926, 5 pages
Research Article

Fabrication of Aligned Side-by-Side TiO2/SnO2 Nanofibers via Dual-Opposite-Spinneret Electrospinning

1School of Aerospace, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
2Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Received 18 October 2011; Revised 23 November 2011; Accepted 28 November 2011

Academic Editor: Tong Lin

Copyright © 2012 Fu Xu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Well-aligned and uniform side-by-side bicomponent fibers have been produced via dual-opposite-spinneret electrospinning. Side-by-side TiO2/SnO2 nanofibers were obtained after calcining as-spun fibers. The thermal degradation of the electrospun fibers was evaluated using combined thermogravimetry and differential thermal analysis (TG-DTA), and the crystal structure of calcined nanofibers was investigated by X-ray diffraction (XRD). The fabricated TiO2/SnO2 nanofibers expose both TiO2 mainly consisting of anatase phase and rutile-type SnO2 to the surface, which is appropriate for photocatalytic materials.

1. Introduction

Photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants has been investigated widely in water and air purifications [1]. Hydrogen fuel production by photocatalytic water splitting [2] and high-efficiency solar cells [3] is thought to significantly mitigate the inadequacy of fossil fuels [4]. However, the narrow light-response range and the fast recombination of photogenerated charge carriers reduce the efficiency of photocatalytic reactions and therefore hinder the practicable applications of photocatalytic technique [5, 6].

Many studies have focused on new photocatalytic materials for fabricating high-efficiency photocatalysts. One strategy of fabricating new photocatalytic materials is forming a heterojunction between TiO2 and other semiconductors, which could both extend the light-response range and reduce the recombination of photogenerated charge carriers [7]. Thin-film heterojunctions and particle heterojunctions have been fabricated via various methods: Kanai et al. [8] deposited SnO2/TiO2 (TiO2 overcoated with SnO2) thin-film stacks by reactive DC magnetron sputtering, and Tada et al. [9] produced patterned bilayer of TiO2/SnO2 (SnO2 overcoated with TiO2 stripes) using modified sol-gel method. One point to note is that these films were coated on substrates; thus, the photocatalyst lost approximately half of the contact surface between itself and reactants, which decreased the photocatalytic efficiency. On the other hand, coupled and capped semiconductor particles [10] may expose more surfaces to reactants, but it is difficult to separate powder photocatalysts from the solution after photocatalytic reaction. Therefore, nanofibers would be an appropriate structure for fabricating a type of photocatalyst with a large surface area exposed to reactants while maintaining good recoverability.

Electrospinning, regarded as a simple, low-cost, and universal technique for fabricating submicrofibers and nanofibers, has been receiving more and more attention over the last 15 years [1113]. In addition to general beaded and nonbeaded thin nanofibers, other types of nanofibers with interesting morphology, such as core-shell nanofibers [1416], hollow nanofibers [17], and side-by-side nanofibers [18, 19], have been produced by electrospinning. A side-by-side structure allows both parts of the nanofibers to be exposed to the surface. Bicomponent side-by-side TiO2/SnO2 nanofiber photocatalysts have been fabricated via side-by-side electrospinning [20]. Their study demonstrated that the photocatalytic degradation rate of Rhodamine B (RhB) dye on the side-by-side TiO2/SnO2 nanofibers was more than double that on the pure TiO2 nanofibers.

In our previous work [21, 22], we have reported a dual-opposite-spinneret electrospinning (DOSE), which could effectively produce well-allied nanofibers. In this work, we report a new approach to fabricate side-by-side TiO2/SnO2 nanofibers using the DOSE.

2. Experimental Procedure

2.1. Electrospinning Apparatus and Parameters

The DOSE apparatus was illustrated in Scheme 1. Electrospinning solution was loaded into the syringe and pumped by the syringe pump. A flat-tipped stainless steel syringe needle was used as the spinneret. Two spinnerets were assembled horizontally in opposite directions, and each was connected to a separate high-voltage power supply. A rotating cylinder covered with aluminum foil was used as a collector.

Scheme 1: Schematic diagram of dual-opposite-spinneret electrospinning apparatus.

The distance between the tips of two spinnerets was 12 cm, the applied voltages were +3100 V and −3100 V, the distance between the spinnerets and the collector was about 15 cm, the rotation rate of the cylinder collector (Diameter 10 cm) was 300 r·min−1. For fabricating SnO2/TiO2 bicomponent nanofibers, the feed rate of solution containing tetrabutyl titanate was 7.2 μL·min−1 and that of solution containing stannous octoate was 4.2 μL·min−1.

2.2. Solutions and Calcining

Solutions for electrospinning were prepared by dissolving polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP, M W = 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 ) and tetrabutyl titanate or stannous octoate into a mixed solvent of ethanol and acetic acid (4 : 1, w/w). In a typical procedure, 2.5 g of tetrabutyl titanate was first dissolved into the mixed solvent, and then 2.4 g of PVP was added, following a constant magnetic stirring for 3 h at room temperature. In the two kinds of homogeneous electrospinning solution, both the concentrations of tetrabutyl titanate or stannous octoate were 11.1 wt%, while the concentration of PVP was 10.7 wt% and 11.5 wt%, respectively. Here, stannous octoate and tetrabutyl titanate were used as the precursors of SnO2 and TiO2, respectively. After electrospinning, the electrospun fibers were calcined at 500°C for 2 h in air environment, and side-by-side bicomponent TiO2/SnO2 nanofibers were fabricated.

2.3. Characterization

The electrospun fibers and calcined nanofibers were sputtered with gold, their morphologies were observed using field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, QUANTA 200 FEG) with an accelerating voltage of 15 kV, and the elemental mapping was conducted by energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). The average diameter of fibers was measured from the SEM micrographs in original magnification of 2000x. Combined thermogravimetry and differential thermal analysis (TG-DTA) were carried out using simultaneous thermal analyzer (Netzsch STA 409) from 100 to 700°C at a heating rate of 10°C min−1 in air atmosphere. The crystal structure of calcined fibers was investigated by X-ray diffraction (XRD, Rigaku D/Max-2500) using Cu Kα radiation ( 𝜆 = 1 . 5 4 0 5 6 Å ).

3. Results and Discussion

In the DOSE process, two jets ejected from the opposite spinnerets and then merged into a single one, which was the great difference compared to the single spinneret electrospinning. This difference brought out two advantages. One advantage was that it was easy to get the well-aligned electrospun fibers. When the two oppositely charged jets merged into a single jet, the newly generated jet had an approximately neutral charge over all, which made it minimally affected by electric force. Therefore, it was easy to collect well-aligned and uniform electrospun fibers, as shown in Figure 1(a). The other advantage was that it was easy to make the side-by-side electrospun fibers. Before the two jets stuck together, some solvent had evaporated and jets had partially solidified, which prevented the mixing of the two parts of the newly generated jet. Thus, it was easy to make the side-by-side electrospun fibers, as shown in Figure 1(b) (partial enlarged views of this figure can be found in S1 Supplementary Material available online at doi: 10.1155/2012/575926). Specifically, it was meaningful when we wanted to make the side-by-side nanofibers from two miscible electrospun solutions. The obvious side-by-side structures were shown in Figures 2(a) and 2(b). There were distinct boundaries in the uniform side-by-side electrospun fibers and calcined nanofibers. Element components of the two parts were identified by EDS, as shown in Figure 2(c). One part contained element titanium (Ti) but no tin (Sn), while the other part contained both Ti and Sn. As Ti was easy to diffuse, the part coming from electrospinning solution containing Sn also contained Ti after calcining.

Figure 1: Morphology of electrospun fibers by FE-SEM (a) well-aligned fibers, (b) side-by-side fibers.
Figure 2: Detailed microstructure of side-by-side fiber by FE-SEM (a) electrospun fiber and (b) calcined nanofiber. (c) EDS spectrums of the fiber in (b).

The diameter of electrospun fibers in the experiment before calcining was 1 . 7 5 ± 0 . 1 4 μm (average of 24 values). After calcining the diameter of nanofibers was much thinner, only 0 . 9 6 ± 0 . 0 4 μm (average of 42 values). The main reason for the decrease in the diameter was the decomposition of PVP during the calcining process. During the calcining, process, the organic matter in electrospun fibers was decomposed, then amorphous TiO2(SnO2) and crystalline TiO2(SnO2) were formed sequentially. TiO2 has three major different crystal structures: rutile, anatase and brookite, and crystal structures influence the property of photocatalyst. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the thermal degradation of the electrospun fibers. Furthermore, considering the presence of the element Sn, TiO2/TiO2 side-by-side nanofibers were produced by DOSE using the same parameters except for a small change in feed rate of electrospinning solutions in order to stabilize the electrospinning process.

TG-DTA was carried out to evaluate the thermal degradation of the electrospun fibers. The simultaneous TG and DTA curves of the TiO2/SnO2 electrospun fibers and TiO2/TiO2 electrospun fibers were shown in Figure 3. Two groups of curves exhibited the same phenomenon in the temperature interval 180~360°C, which indicated that there was degradation of PVP on the side chain as well as decomposition of low-molecular-weight organic matter. In this step, electrospun fibers underwent approximately two-thirds of the total weight loss. The decomposition of the main chain of PVP and the amorphous-crystal phase transformation of metal oxides in fibers occurred around 400°C. The sharp peak in the DTA curve at 377°C in Figure 3(b) corresponded to the decomposition of the main chain of PVP, and the broad peak around 413°C corresponded to the crystallization of the TiO2 anatase phase. There was only one peak around 400°C in DTA curve of Figure 3(a), a reasonable explanation was that the three peaks corresponding to decomposition of the main chain of PVP, crystallization of TiO2, and crystallization of SnO2, respectively, overlapped and composed this broad one. The unnoticeable peaks in both DTA curves centered at 550°C indicated the anatase-rutile phase transformation of TiO2. The thermal degradation process was similar to the results of Nuansing et al. [23] and Park and Kim [24].

Figure 3: TG-DTA curves of thermal decomposition of the electrospun fibers: (a) TiO2/SnO2, (b) TiO2/TiO2, at a heating rate of 10°C min−1 in air.

The XRD patterns of TiO2/SnO2 bicomponent nanofibers and TiO2/TiO2 nanofibers were shown in Figure 4. After calcination at 500°C for 2 h, almost pure anatase-type TiO2 was obtained except for a little rutile phase in the TiO2/TiO2 nanofiber, as shown in Figure 4(b). However, the calcined TiO2/SnO2 bicomponent nanofibers contained anatase-phase TiO2, rutile-type SnO2, and much more rutile-phase TiO2 than TiO2/TiO2 nanofibers. The increase of rutile phase TiO2 in bicomponent nanofibers was due to the presence of Sn. At a lower temperature, rutile-type SnO2 had formed, which promoted the formation of rutile phase in TiO2 [25].

Figure 4: XRD patterns of calcined nanofibers: (a) TiO2/SnO2 (b) TiO2/TiO2, calcined at 500°C for 2 h.

The calcined side-by-side TiO2/SnO2 nanofiber possesses great potential in photocatalytic applications. Nanofibers with a side-by-side structure expose both TiO2, mainly consisting of anatase phase and rutile-type SnO2 to the surface. Because of the different band gaps of anatase TiO2 and rutile SnO2, the photogenerated electrons in these fibers would accumulate on one side, and photogenerated holes would accumulate on the other side. Therefore the recombination of photogenerated electrons and holes would greatly decrease, resulting in high photocatalytic activity.

4. Conclusion

Well-aligned and uniform side-by-side electrospun fibers were fabricated using the DOSE method. DOSE has great advantages for fabricating aligned side-by-side fibers: (a) because the jet instability is almost eliminated after the positive and negative charges neutralize each other, the electrospun bicomponent nanofibers produced via DOSE are well aligned and uniform; (b) because some solvent has evaporated and jets have partially solidified before the final jet is formed, there is much lower immiscibility requirement for making side-by-side structure between the two kinds of solutions used in electrospinning. TiO2/SnO2 side-by-side bicomponent nanofibers were obtained after being calcined in air at 500°C for 2 h. The fabricated TiO2/SnO2 nanofibers exposed both TiO2 mainly consisting of anatase phase and rutile-type SnO2 to the surface, which is appropriate for photocatalytic materials.


This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 60906050 and Grant no. 51077083).


  1. M. R. Hoffmann, S. T. Martin, W. Choi, and D. W. Bahnemann, “Environmental applications of semiconductor photocatalysis,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 69–96, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. Z. Zou, J. Ye, K. Sayama, and H. Arakawa, “Direct splitting of water under visible light irradiation with an oxide semiconductor photocatalyst,” Nature, vol. 414, no. 6864, pp. 625–627, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. T. Ma, M. Akiyama, E. Abe, and I. Imai, “High-efficiency dye-sensitized solar cell based on a nitrogen-doped nanostructured titania electrode,” Nano Letters, vol. 5, no. 12, pp. 2543–2547, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. G. Liu, L. Wang, H. G. Yang, H. M. Cheng, and G. Q. Lu, “Titania-based photocatalysts—crystal growth, doping and heterostructuring,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 831–843, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. T. Ihara, M. Miyoshi, M. Ando, S. Sugihara, and Y. Iriyama, “Preparation of a visible-light-active TiO2 photocatalyst by RF plasma treatment,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 36, no. 17, pp. 4201–4207, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. L. Zheng, Y. Zheng, C. Chen et al., “Network structured SnO2/ZnO heterojunction nanocatalyst with high photocatalytic activity,” Inorganic Chemistry, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 1819–1825, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. S. Y. Chai, Y. J. Kim, M. H. Jung, A. K. Chakraborty, D. Jung, and W. I. Lee, “Heterojunctioned BiOCl/Bi2O3, a new visible light photocatalyst,” Journal of Catalysis, vol. 262, no. 1, pp. 144–149, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. N. Kanai, T. Nuida, K. Ueta, K. Hashimoto, T. Watanabe, and H. Ohsaki, “Photocatalytic efficiency of TiO2/SnO2 thin film stacks prepared by DC magnetron sputtering,” Vacuum, vol. 74, no. 3-4, pp. 723–727, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. H. Tada, A. Hattori, Y. Tokihisa, K. Imai, N. Tohge, and S. Ito, “A patterned-TiO2/SnO2 bilayer type photocatalyst,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 104, no. 19, pp. 4586–4587, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  10. I. Bedja and P. V. Kamat, “Capped semiconductor colloids. Synthesis and photoelectrochemical behavior of TiO2-capped SnO2 nanocrystallites,” Journal of Physical Chemistry, vol. 99, no. 22, pp. 9182–9188, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. Doshi and D. H. Reneker, “Electrospinning process and applications of electrospun fibers,” Journal of Electrostatics, vol. 35, no. 2-3, pp. 151–160, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Z. M. Huang, Y. Z. Zhang, M. Kotaki, and S. Ramakrishna, “A review on polymer nanofibers by electrospinning and their applications in nanocomposites,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 63, no. 15, pp. 2223–2253, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. Greiner and J. H. Wendorff, “Electrospinning: a fascinating method for the preparation of ultrathin fibers,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 46, no. 30, pp. 5670–5703, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. Z. Sun, E. Zussman, A. L. Yarin, J. H. Wendorff, and A. Greiner, “Compound core-shell polymer nanofibers by co-electrospinning,” Advanced Materials, vol. 15, no. 22, pp. 1929–1932, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. Y. Zhang, Z. M. Huang, X. Xu, C. T. Lim, and S. Ramakrishna, “Preparation of core-shell structured PCL-r-gelatin bi-component nanofibers by coaxial electrospinning,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 16, no. 18, pp. 3406–3409, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. V. Bazilevsky, A. L. Yarin, and C. M. Megaridis, “Co-electrospinning of core-shell fibers using a single-nozzle technique,” Langmuir, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 2311–2314, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. D. Li and Y. Xia, “Direct fabrication of composite and ceramic hollow nanofibers by electrospinning,” Nano Letters, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 933–938, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. P. Gupta and G. L. Wilkes, “Some investigations on the fiber formation by utilizing a side-by-side bicomponent electrospinning approach,” Polymer, vol. 44, no. 20, pp. 6353–6359, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. T. Lin, H. Wang, and X. Wang, “Self-crimping bicomponent nanofibers electrospun from polyacrylonitrile and elastomeric polyurethane,” Advanced Materials, vol. 17, no. 22, pp. 2699–2703, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. Z. Liu, D. D. Sun, P. Guo, and J. O. Leckie, “An efficient bicomponent TiO2/SnO2 nanofiber photocatalyst fabricated by electrospinning with a side-by-side dual spinneret method,” Nano Letters, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1081–1085, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. H. Pan, L. Li, L. Hu, and X. Cui, “Continuous aligned polymer fibers produced by a modified electrospinning method,” Polymer, vol. 47, no. 14, pp. 4901–4904, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. X. Cui, L. Li, J. Xu, and F. Xu, “Fabrication of continuous aligned polyvinylpyrrolidone fibers via electrospinning by elimination of the jet bending instability,” Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 116, no. 6, pp. 3676–3681, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. W. Nuansing, S. Ninmuang, W. Jarernboon, S. Maensiri, and S. Seraphin, “Structural characterization and morphology of electrospun TiO2 nanofibers,” Materials Science and Engineering B, vol. 131, no. 1–3, pp. 147–155, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. Y. Park and S. S. Kim, “Effects of processing parameters on the synthesis of TiO2 nanofibers by electrospinning,” Metals and Materials International, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 95–99, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. R. Zhang, H. Wu, D. Lin, and W. Pan, “Preparation of necklace-structured TiO2/SnO2 hybrid nanofibers and their photocatalytic activity,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 92, no. 10, pp. 2463–2466, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar