Journal of Nanomaterials

Journal of Nanomaterials / 2015 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 264037 | 8 pages |

Recyclable Magnetite Nanoparticle Catalyst for One-Pot Conversion of Cellobiose to 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural in Water

Academic Editor: Hassan Karimi-Maleh
Received20 Aug 2015
Accepted29 Sep 2015
Published18 Oct 2015


Environmentally benign and easily recoverable magnetite nanoparticles (Fe3O4 NPs) were demonstrated to catalyze the one-pot conversion of cellobiose, a glucose disaccharide, to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (5-HMF). The conversion was achieved in water under hydrothermal conditions. The catalytic activity of Fe3O4 NPs surpassed those of iron (II) and iron (III) chlorides in this reaction. Optimized cellobiose conversion reactions catalyzed with Fe3O4 NPs gave the highest 5-HMF yields of 23.4 ± 0.6% at 160°C for 24 hours. After three reuses, the Fe3O4 NP catalyst retained its catalytic activity with similar 5-HMF yields, demonstrating the recyclability of this eco-friendly catalyst in water.

1. Introduction

Magnetite nanoparticles (Fe3O4 NPs) have been extensively applied in various technological areas such as bioseparation, target drug delivery, immunoassays, and magnetic resonance imaging because of their magnetic properties, nanosize, and high surface-area-to-volume ratio [13]. In the past couple of years, Fe3O4 NPs have been widely studied as catalysts [4] and catalyst supports [5, 6] for heterogeneous catalysis. For example, Fe3O4 NPs were demonstrated to independently catalyze Fenton’s reaction [7]. Owing to their nanosize, large surface area, and basic sites on their surfaces, Fe3O4 NPs were also demonstrated to catalyze ozonation of parachlorobenzoic acid [8].

Recently, catalysts composed of active functional groups immobilized on Fe3O4 NPs have been widely studied for the catalytic production of industrial chemical precursors from renewable resources because of the ease of retrieving Fe3O4 NPs using magnetic methods [9, 10]. Particularly, these catalysts composed of magnetic cores are fast emerging as viable alternatives to homogeneous catalysts in biomass processing [11, 12] as well as for the synthesis of platform chemicals such as 5-ethoxymethylfurfural [13], 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid [14], and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (5-HMF) [15] in the presence of organic solvents from sustainable biomass.

With an estimated current global market of about 100 tonnes per year [16], 5-HMF has been recognized as one promising renewable platform chemical because it can serve as a carbon neutral feedstock for over a dozen important industrial biopolymer and biofuel precursors [17, 18]. Most early bench scale efforts to produce 5-HMF focused on using fructose as a starting material due to its ease of dehydration to 5-HMF with Brønsted acid catalysts or metal salts in the presence of biphasic systems of organic solvents and ionic liquids [1925]. Recently, there have also been intense research efforts to directly produce 5-HMF from cellulose, the most abundant plant-based polymer of glucose on Earth [26, 27]. The use of cellulose as a starting material is attractive because of its comparatively low cost and large natural abundance [28]. In this case, the formation of 5-HMF typically involves the breaking of the β-(1,4)-glycosidic bonds linking the glucose monomers in cellulose, followed by isomerization of glucose to fructose and then dehydration of fructose to 5-HMF [29, 30]. Though acids and metal salts have been successfully shown to catalyze the conversions of fructose and cellulose into 5-HMF in biphasic media, the application of voluminous amounts of homogeneous acids is not industrially viable because these acids can corrode reactors [23, 31]. Also, the recovery of the homogeneous metal salt catalysts is difficult. Diverse heterogeneous materials ranging from acidic polymers and traditional metal oxides to phosphate catalysts applied with organic solvents have also been demonstrated for 5-HMF synthesis [23]. Nevertheless, organic solvents are environmentally toxic. Hence, designing cost effective heterogeneous catalysts for use in reactions where water is the sole solvent is a significant next step for sustainable production of 5-HMF [32].

Herein, we report our study of Fe3O4 NP catalyst for the one-pot conversion of cellobiose to 5-HMF in aqueous media under hydrothermal conditions. To the best of our knowledge, the application of environmentally safe, easily recoverable Fe3O4 NPs as catalysts for the production of 5-HMF in aqueous media has not yet been reported. Cellobiose, the smallest repeating disaccharide unit of cellulose, was used as a model feedstock to investigate the effectiveness of Fe3O4 NPs at breaking the β-(1,4)-glycosidic bond between the glucose units and the formation of 5-HMF from it. Cellulose was not investigated in our current study since its breakdown in an aqueous medium is known to be difficult due to its hydrogen bonding network. The catalytic activity of Fe3O4 NP catalyst on 5-HMF production was evaluated and compared with those of common iron chloride salts. The reusability of these Fe3O4 NPs was examined by multiple recycling experiments. The effect of Fe3O4 NPs on the dehydration of glucose and fructose was investigated to elucidate the potential mechanism for the conversion of cellobiose to 5-HMF.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

D-Fructose (99%), D-glucose, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (5-HMF) (99%), iron (II) chloride tetrahydrate (FeCl2·4H2O, 98%), iron (III) chloride hexahydrate (FeCl3·6H2O, ACS reagent grade), and sulfuric acid (H2SO4, 99.999%, HPLC grade) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). D-Cellobiose (98+%) was obtained from Alfa Aesar (Ward Hill, MA). Ammonium hydroxide (NH3·H2O, Certified ACS Plus) was purchased from Fischer Scientific (Waltham, MA). All purchased chemicals were used as received. 18 MΩ·cm deionized water was generated using a Synergy filtration system (VWR, Radnor, PA).

2.2. Synthesis and Characterization of Fe3O4 NPs

Fe3O4 NPs were synthesized using a reported coprecipitation technique in an alkaline solution [33]. Briefly, 11.7 g of FeCl3·6H2O and 4.3 g of FeCl2·4H2O were slowly dissolved in 250 mL of deionized water under nitrogen atmosphere while being vigorously stirred at room temperature. 50 mL of 28% NH3·H2O was added dropwise to the reaction mixture which was then stirred for 2 hours. Black particles formed in the reaction were separated using a magnet and thoroughly washed with deionized water three times. The products were left to dry under ambient conditions overnight before use.

The morphology of the as-prepared Fe3O4 NPs was examined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) using a Hitachi H7500 TEM operated at 80 kV. The crystal structure of as-synthesized Fe3O4 NPs and recycled Fe3O4 NPs was examined using a PANalytical Empyrean diffractometer (PANalytical, Westborough, MA). The X-ray source was operated at 45 kV and 40 mA current to generate Cu Kα X-ray with an average wavelength of 1.544 Å. The surface area of Fe3O4 NPs was determined by the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method using an ASAP 2020 Analyzer (Micromeritics Instrument Corporation, Norcross, GA) and nitrogen.

2.3. Catalytic Reactions with Fe3O4 NPs and Iron-Based Salts

Experiments for the conversion reactions were carried out in Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave Parr vessels (Vessel number 4744, Parr Instrument, Moline, IL). In a typical experiment, 0.02 g of the iron-based catalyst was added to 10 mL of a 50 mM cellobiose aqueous solution in a Teflon liner. The assembled stainless steel autoclave was heated at 160°C and maintained at this temperature for 24 hours. After the autoclave was cooled to room temperature, the identities and concentrations of products were analyzed by high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC). Control experiments were conducted without the catalysts. The experiments were performed in triplicate. Experiments were repeated with glucose and fructose as the carbon source reactants under the same reaction conditions. The product yields were reported as average values from the triplicates and the uncertainty of these values was estimated as the standard deviation of the mean. Note that we had also studied the cellobiose conversion reactions at various reaction temperatures ranging from 140°C to 180°C and with various reaction times from 12 hours to 72 hours. Only yield data of reactions at 160°C and with reaction time of 24 hours were reported because this condition gave the best product yields for the cellobiose conversion to 5-HMF.

2.4. HPLC Analysis

The products from the cellobiose conversion experiments were analyzed by HPLC using a method developed at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory [34]. Before each HPLC analysis, the product mixtures from the experiments were first centrifuged and then filtered through a 0.2 μm polytetrafluoroethylene syringe filter (VWR, Radnor, PA) to remove any solid catalysts. The identification and quantification of products in the filtrates were performed on an Aminex HPX-87H column (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA) equipped with a Waters 410 Differential Refractometer (Waters, Milford, MA). 5 mM sulfuric acid was used as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min. The column and the detector were maintained at 55°C and 35°C, respectively. Samples of cellobiose, glucose, fructose, and 5-HMF in water were prepared and used as standards to obtain the calibration curves for the quantification of these chemicals in the reaction products. The identifications of acetic acid, formic acid, levulinic acid, lactic acid, hydroxyacetone, and 1,6-anhydroglucose were also determined by HPLC. The formation of fructose was confirmed by HPLC analysis using an Alltech Alltima amino 100A column (Grace, Columbia, MD) at Microbac Laboratories, Inc. (Boulder, CO).

The calculations for conversion of cellobiose to 5-HMF and conversion of glucose to 5-HMF were performed using the following formulae:where subscripts I and F represent the initial and final concentrations of cellobiose (glucose, fructose, or 5-HMF). The calculations and formulae for fructose conversion and corresponding 5-HMF yield were similar to those for the reactions with glucose as the precursor.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Physical and Structural Characterization of Fe3O4 NPs

Fe3O4 NPs were synthesized using a coprecipitation method to yield a black product. TEM images of the as-synthesized Fe3O4 NPs showed that their sizes ranged from 10 nm to 30 nm (Figure 1). The XRD pattern of these Fe3O4 NPs matched that of Fe3O4 when indexed according to the ICDD data card # 01-089-4319, confirming the identity of the NPs (Figure 2). From BET measurements, the surface area of the Fe3O4 NPs was found to be 72.4 m2/g.

3.2. Catalytic Activities of Iron-Based Catalysts on the Conversion of Cellobiose to 5-HMF

Common divalent and trivalent iron salts (FeCl2, FeCl3) have been utilized for the breakdown of hemicellulose and cellulose as well as for 5-HMF synthesis because of their strong Lewis acidity and basicity [3537]. In order to compare the catalytic performance of the heterogeneous and homogeneous iron-based systems, the conversion of cellobiose to 5-HMF was evaluated in the presence of Fe3O4 NPs, FeCl2, and FeCl3 (Figure 3(a)). The conversion reaction was performed using the optimized reaction parameters of 160°C for 24 hours under hydrothermal conditions. Cellulose is known to undergo near complete conversion under hydrothermal conditions to form numerous degradation products [38, 39]. For our experiments under hydrothermal conditions, cellobiose conversion of ~99% was obtained irrespective of the presence or the absence of the catalyst. Cellobiose was postulated to undergo hydrolysis to form glucose which further reversibly isomerized to fructose and some unstable reaction intermediates. 5-HMF was finally formed as a consequence of the dehydration of fructose [30, 31, 40, 41].

Reactions with Fe3O4 NPs produced the highest 5-HMF yield of % while that with control experiment with no catalysts gave merely %, suggesting unquestionable influence of the NPs in these reactions. Additionally, the iron salts underperformed in the 5-HMF yields as compared to Fe3O4 NPs. This indicates that both iron (II) and iron (III) ions are not effective in predominantly converting cellobiose to 5-HMF. Using these results, we conclude that any potentially leached iron ions from Fe3O4 NPs are not expected to have significant effect on the product yields. Also, hydrolysis of iron salts in an aqueous medium can lead to the formation of iron complexes and acids which are known to increase side products formation, leading to a decline in the 5-HMF yields [42]. Hence, the high 5-HMF yields obtained with the Fe3O4 NPs are mainly resulting from magnetite as the catalyst. Glucose and fructose were identified as the major by-products of this reaction (Figure 3(b)). We note that the reversible glucose to fructose isomerization was also improved wherein higher fructose yields were obtained with Fe3O4 NPs (%) as opposed to when FeCl2 (%) or FeCl3 (%) was used. Acids and polymeric humins constituted almost all remaining fractions of the converted cellobiose.

3.3. Recycling of Fe3O4 NP Catalyst

Fe3O4 NPs were found to be not only catalytically active for this conversion reaction but also easily separable from the liquid products. We evaluated the recyclability of this Fe3O4 NP catalyst by performing three successive runs with recovered catalysts. After each reaction run, the catalyst was removed from the reaction solution by magnetic means and washed with deionized water four times. The retrieved catalyst was dried at 80°C for an hour in air and then was reused in a follow-up reaction run. The catalytic activity of Fe3O4 NPs was mostly retained after the recycling runs (Figure 4(a)). However, likely due to the deposition of the reaction by-products such as polymeric humins on the catalyst surface [43], the recycled catalysts became slightly less active after each recycle run and the 5-HMF yields of reactions conducted with the recycled Fe3O4 NPs decreased by 1–3% after each recycle run. Nonetheless, the XRD patterns of the Fe3O4 NPs after each recycling run remained similar to that before the reaction (Figure 4(b)). This result indicated that Fe3O4 of the NP catalyst did not exhibit detectable changes into other forms of iron oxides and remained as the active component in these recycle run experiments.

3.4. Effect of Fe3O4 NP Catalyst on the Conversion of Glucose and Fructose to 5-HMF

Currently, 5-HMF is industrially prepared from fructose instead of the relatively cheap and abundant glucose [16]. In order to convert glucose to 5-HMF, glucose must first be isomerized to fructose by an additional catalyst [44]. This additional step increases the overall manufacturing costs through this reaction scheme. Since both glucose and fructose are identifiable intermediate products in the conversion of cellobiose, we further investigated the effect of applying Fe3O4 NP catalyst to directly dehydrate glucose and fructose to 5-HMF at 160°C for 24 hours under hydrothermal conditions.

From our experimental results, glucose was found to achieve <90% conversion, but fructose was found to achieve >99% conversion irrespective of the presence or absence of the Fe3O4 NP catalyst (Tables 1 and 2). Among common monosaccharides, the ability of fructose to undergo complete conversion under acidic and aqueous conditions is well known [15]. Thus, our observed results can be attributed to the relative higher stability of glucose’s ring structure, which not only lowers the fraction of open chain forms, but also reduces the rate of formation of enol, a key intermediate in the isomerization reaction to form fructose [45]. Similarly, with Fe3O4 NPs, glucose to fructose isomerization was enhanced when glucose was used as the starting reagent. Under subcritical water conditions, the reaction temperature is known to directly influence the reaction rate [46]. Hence, the difference in the reaction rates of these two monosaccharides likely caused the variation in the 5-HMF yield at the evaluated temperature. Though reactions with glucose at 160°C led to a maximum 5-HMF yield (%), the corresponding 5-HMF produced from fructose degraded further to by-products at the same evaluated reaction temperature, resulting in an overall lower 5-HMF yield (%). Nevertheless, the influence of Fe3O4 NPs on the conversion of both monosaccharides to 5-HMF was still significant because the product yields were at least two times larger than those of the control experiments (Tables 1 and 2).

CatalystGlucose conversion (%)Fructose yield (%)5-HMF yield (%)

No catalyst46.4 ± 2.2<111.9 ± 0.7
Fe3O4 NPs89.2 ± 0.12.6 ± 0.223.6 ± 0.5

CatalystFructose conversion (%)Glucose yield (%)5-HMF yield (%)

No catalyst>99<18.9 ± 0.1
Fe3O4 NPs>99<117.3 ± 0.5

3.5. Reaction Mechanism of the Conversion of Cellobiose to 5-HMF Using Fe3O4 NP Catalysts

Through examining the presence of various reaction products, we postulated that the hydrothermal conversion of cellobiose to 5-HMF with the Fe3O4 NP catalyst primarily followed a common reaction scheme for the conversion of oligosaccharides to 5-HMF and side products (Figure 5). In our case, cellobiose was proposed to first undergo hydrolysis to form glucose. Under the hydrothermal condition, glucose then underwent the reversible isomerization (or the Lobry de Bruyn-Alberda van Ekenstein (LBAE) transformation) [40, 46, 47] to fructose and other ring-opened unstable intermediates which eventually dehydrated to 5-HMF [45, 48]. This was supported by the HPLC data which showed the presence of both glucose and fructose among the reaction products. The unstable intermediates, however, could not be isolated from the reaction mixture. Bifunctional metal oxides such as titania which contain both Lewis acid and base sites are known to improve glucose to fructose isomerization along with 5-HMF production [30]. The improvements in 5-HMF yields and glucose to fructose isomerization in our case can similarly be attributed to the amphoteric nature of Fe3O4 [49].

In addition, acid by-products including formic acid, levulinic acid, lactic acid, acetic acid (<11.1%), and other side products such as hydroxyacetone and 1,6-anhydroglucose were identified in minute amounts (<1.5%) by HPLC. The presence of these acid by-products corroborated well the decrease in the pH of the reaction mixture from ca. 6 to ca. 3 after the reaction. The presence of these acids was not surprising because, in an aqueous, acidic medium, 5-HMF can be rehydrated to form levulinic and formic acid [50]. Acetic acid and lactic acid, potential retroaldol reaction products of glucose, were also detected by HPLC [51]. Hydroxyacetone and 1,6-anhydroglucose are known to be degradation products of fructose [46] and glucose [48], respectively. The color of the reaction products was always observed to attain different shades of brown, suggesting the formation of humins, insoluble polymers formed from 5-HMF [50]. Further, Lewis acidity was enhanced in iron oxide NPs because of the high degree of Fe-coordinative unsaturation in the oxide which improved their overall activity for isomerization reactions [52].

4. Conclusion

Magnetite nanoparticles (Fe3O4 NPs) were demonstrated to be effective catalysts at converting cellobiose to 5-HMF in an aqueous medium under hydrothermal conditions. The highest 5-HMF yields of % were obtained at 160°C for 24 hours of reaction time and at a catalyst loading of just 0.02 g. This catalyst outperformed common iron salts (FeCl2 and FeCl3) of equal loading in producing 5-HMF in this reaction. Since Fe3O4 NPs can be easily separable using magnetic methods and are demonstrated to be recyclable for this reaction, these environmentally friendly catalysts have excellent potential to be used for dehydrating both fructose and recalcitrant glucose to 5-HMF with comparable yields upon further optimized studies.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


The authors thank the Research Council of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL) for the funding support and the Nebraska Center for Materials and Nanoscience and the Morrison Microscopy Core Research Facility for the use of their facilities. The authors are grateful to Lukasz Gauza at UNL for his help with the BET measurements.


  1. W. Wu, Z. Wu, T. Yu, C. Jiang, and W.-S. Kim, “Recent progress on magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis, surface functional strategies and biomedical applications,” Science and Technology of Advanced Materials, vol. 16, no. 2, Article ID 023501, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. Y. Zhang, L. Zhang, X. Song et al., “Synthesis of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles modified with MPEG-PEI via photochemistry as new MRI contrast agent,” Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2015, Article ID 417389, 6 pages, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. X. Gu, Y. Zhang, H. Sun, X. Song, C. Fu, and P. Dong, “Mussel-inspired polydopamine coated iron oxide nanoparticles for biomedical application,” Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2015, Article ID 154592, 12 pages, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. T. Zeng, W.-W. Chen, C. M. Cirtiu, A. Moores, G. Song, and C.-J. Li, “Fe3O4 nanoparticles: a robust and magnetically recoverable catalyst for three-component coupling of aldehyde, alkyne and amine,” Green Chemistry, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 570–573, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. R. S. Varma, “Nano-catalysts with magnetic core: sustainable options for greener synthesis,” Sustainable Chemical Processes, vol. 2, article 11, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. B. Gawande, P. S. Branco, and R. S. Varma, “Nano-magnetite (Fe3O4) as a support for recyclable catalysts in the development of sustainable methodologies,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 3371–3393, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. L. Gao, J. Zhuang, L. Nie et al., “Intrinsic peroxidase-like activity of ferromagnetic nanoparticles,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 577–583, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. H. Jung, H. Park, J. Kim et al., “Preparation of biotic and abiotic iron oxide nanoparticles (IOnPs) and their properties and applications in heterogeneous catalytic oxidation,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 41, no. 13, pp. 4741–4747, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. N. Mei, B. Liu, J. Zheng, K. Lv, D. Tang, and Z. Zhang, “A novel magnetic palladium catalyst for the mild aerobic oxidation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural into 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid in water,” Catalysis Science & Technology, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 3194–3202, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. S. Wang, Z. Zhang, B. Liu, and J. Li, “Silica coated magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles supported phosphotungstic acid: a novel environmentally friendly catalyst for the synthesis of 5-ethoxymethylfurfural from 5-hydroxymethylfurfural and fructose,” Catalysis Science and Technology, vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 2104–2112, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. D.-M. Lai, L. Deng, Q.-X. Guo, and Y. Fu, “Hydrolysis of biomass by magnetic solid acid,” Energy and Environmental Science, vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 3552–3557, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. Y. Xiong, Z. Zhang, X. Wang, B. Liu, and J. Lin, “Hydrolysis of cellulose in ionic liquids catalyzed by a magnetically-recoverable solid acid catalyst,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 235, pp. 349–355, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. S. Yin, J. Sun, B. Liu, and Z. Zhang, “Magnetic material grafted cross-linked imidazolium based polyionic liquids: an efficient acid catalyst for the synthesis of promising liquid fuel 5-ethoxymethylfurfural from carbohydrates,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 4992–4999, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. S. Wang, Z. Zhang, and B. Liu, “Catalytic conversion of fructose and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural into 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid over a recyclable Fe3O4-CoOx magnetite nanocatalyst,” ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 406–412, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. L. Hu, X. Tang, Z. Wu et al., “Magnetic lignin-derived carbonaceous catalyst for the dehydration of fructose into 5-hydroxymethylfurfural in dimethylsulfoxide,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 263, pp. 299–308, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. BAC Reports, 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural (CAS 67-47-0) Market Research Report 2015, May 2015.
  17. G. W. Huber, Breaking the Chemical and Engineering Barriers to Lignocellulosic Biofuels: Next Generation Hydrocarbon Biorefineries, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Mass, USA, 2008.
  18. J. J. Bozell and G. R. Petersen, “Technology development for the production of biobased products from biorefinery carbohydrates—the US Department of Energy’s “Top 10” revisited,” Green Chemistry, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 539–554, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. M. Dashtban, A. Gilbert, and P. Fatehi, “Recent advancements in the production of hydroxymethylfurfural,” RSC Advances, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 2037–2050, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. L. Yang, G. Tsilomelekis, S. Caratzoulas, and D. G. Vlachos, “Mechanism of Brønsted Acid-Catalyzed Glucose Dehydration,” ChemSusChem, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 1334–1341, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. H. Zhao, J. E. Holladay, H. Brown, and Z. C. Zhang, “Metal chlorides in ionic liquid solvents convert sugars to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural,” Science, vol. 316, no. 5831, pp. 1597–1600, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. Y. J. Pagán-Torres, T. Wang, J. M. R. Gallo, B. H. Shanks, and J. A. Dumesic, “Production of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural from glucose using a combination of Lewis and Brønsted acid catalysts in water in a biphasic reactor with an alkylphenol solvent,” ACS Catalysis, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 930–934, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. K. D. O. Vigier and F. Jérôme, “Heterogeneously-catalyzed conversion of carbohydrates,” in Carbohydrates in Sustainable Development II, A. P. Rauter, P. Vogel, and Y. Queneau, Eds., pp. 63–92, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  24. S. P. Teong, G. Yi, and Y. Zhang, “Hydroxymethylfurfural production from bioresources: past, present and future,” Green Chemistry, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 2015–2026, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. H. V. Lee, S. B. Hamid, and S. K. Zain, “Conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to nanocellulose: structure and chemical process,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2014, Article ID 631013, 20 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. Z. C. Gernhart, A. Bhalkikar, J. J. Burke et al., “One-pot conversion of cellobiose to mannose using a hybrid phosphotungstic acid–cerium oxide catalyst,” RSC Advances, vol. 5, no. 36, pp. 28478–28486, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. Y.-H. Percival Zhang, J. Cui, L. R. Lynd, and L. R. Kuang, “A transition from cellulose swelling to cellulose dissolution by o-phosphoric acid: evidence from enzymatic hydrolysis and supramolecular structure,” Biomacromolecules, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 644–648, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. V. Degirmenci, E. A. Pidko, P. C. M. M. Magusin, and E. J. M. Hensen, “Towards a selective heterogeneous catalyst for glucose dehydration to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural in water: CrCl2 catalysis in a thin immobilized ionic liquid layer,” ChemCatChem, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 969–972, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. R.-J. van Putten, J. C. van der Waal, E. de Jong, C. B. Rasrendra, H. J. Heeres, and J. G. de Vries, “Hydroxymethylfurfural, a versatile platform chemical made from renewable resources,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 113, no. 3, pp. 1499–1597, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. M. Watanabe, Y. Aizawa, T. Iida et al., “Glucose reactions with acid and base catalysts in hot compressed water at 473 K,” Carbohydrate Research, vol. 340, no. 12, pp. 1925–1930, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. F. S. Asghari and H. Yoshida, “Acid-catalyzed production of 5-hydroxymethyl furfural from D-fructose in subcritical water,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 2163–2173, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. F. Ilgen, D. Ott, D. Kralisch, C. Reil, A. Palmberger, and B. König, “Conversion of carbohydrates into 5-hydroxymethylfurfural in highly concentrated low melting mixtures,” Green Chemistry, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 1948–1954, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. A. Pourjavadi, S. H. Hosseini, M. Doulabi, S. M. Fakoorpoor, and F. Seidi, “Multi-Layer functionalized poly(ionic liquid) coated magnetic nanoparticles: highly recoverable and magnetically separable brønsted acid catalyst,” ACS Catalysis, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 1259–1266, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. A. Sluiter, B. Hames, R. Ruiz, C. Scarlata, J. Sluiter, and D. Templeton, “Determination of sugars, byproducts, and degradation products in liquid fraction process samples,” Tech. Rep. NREL/TP-510-42623, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  35. G. Marcotullio, E. Krisanti, J. Giuntoli, and W. de Jong, “Selective production of hemicellulose-derived carbohydrates from wheat straw using dilute HCl or FeCl3 solutions under mild conditions. X-ray and thermo-gravimetric analysis of the solid residues,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 102, no. 10, pp. 5917–5923, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. L. Liu, J. Sun, C. Cai, S. Wang, H. Pei, and J. Zhang, “Corn stover pretreatment by inorganic salts and its effects on hemicellulose and cellulose degradation,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 100, no. 23, pp. 5865–5871, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. C. M. Cai, N. Nagane, R. Kumar, and C. E. Wyman, “Coupling metal halides with a co-solvent to produce furfural and 5-HMF at high yields directly from lignocellulosic biomass as an integrated biofuels strategy,” Green Chemistry, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 3819–3829, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. O. Bobleter, “Hydrothermal degradation of polymers derived from plants,” Progress in Polymer Science, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 797–841, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. M. Sasaki, B. Kabyemela, R. Malaluan et al., “Cellulose hydrolysis in subcritical and supercritical water,” Journal of Supercritical Fluids, vol. 13, no. 1–3, pp. 261–268, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. B. M. Kabyemela, T. Adschiri, R. M. Malaluan, and K. Arai, “Glucose and fructose decomposition in subcritical and supercritical water: detailed reaction pathway, mechanisms, and kinetics,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 2888–2895, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. Y. L. Song, Y. H. Qu, C. P. Huang, L. H. Ge, Y. X. Li, and B. H. Chen, “Single-step conversion of cellobiose to 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural (5-HMF) catalyzed by poly ionic liquid,” Advanced Materials Research, vol. 1004-1005, pp. 885–890, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. F. Liu, M. Audemar, K. D. O. De Oliveira Vigier et al., “Selectivity enhancement in the aqueous acid-catalyzed conversion of glucose to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural induced by choline chloride,” Green Chemistry, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 3205–3213, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. A. Mukherjee, M.-J. Dumont, and V. Raghavan, “Review: sustainable production of hydroxymethylfurfural and levulinic acid: challenges and opportunities,” Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 72, pp. 143–183, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. R.-J. van Putten, J. N. M. Soetedjo, E. A. Pidko et al., “Dehydration of different ketoses and aldoses to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural,” ChemSusChem, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 1681–1687, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. A. A. Rosatella, S. P. Simeonov, R. F. M. Frade, and C. A. M. Afonso, “5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) as a building block platform: biological properties, synthesis and synthetic applications,” Green Chemistry, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 754–793, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. M. Möller, F. Harnisch, and U. Schröder, “Microwave-assisted hydrothermal degradation of fructose and glucose in subcritical water,” Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 39, pp. 389–398, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. T. M. Aida, K. Tajima, M. Watanabe et al., “Reactions of d-fructose in water at temperatures up to 400 °C and pressures up to 100 MPa,” Journal of Supercritical Fluids, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 110–119, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. A. A. Peterson, F. Vogel, R. P. Lachance, M. Fröling, M. J. Antal Jr., and J. W. Tester, “Thermochemical biofuel production in hydrothermal media: a review of sub- and supercritical water technologies,” Energy and Environmental Science, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 32–65, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. R. M. Cornell and U. Schwertmann, “Surface chemistry and colloidal stability,” in The Iron Oxides: Structure, Properties, Reactions, Occurences and Uses, pp. 221–252, Wiley, Weinheim, Germany, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  50. M. J. Antal Jr., W. S. L. Mok, and G. N. Richards, “Mechanism of formation of 5-(hydroxymethyl)-2-furaldehyde from D-fructose and sucrose,” Carbohydrate Research, vol. 199, no. 1, pp. 91–109, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. T. M. Aida, Y. Sato, M. Watanabe et al., “Dehydration of d-glucose in high temperature water at pressures up to 80 MPa,” Journal of Supercritical Fluids, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 381–388, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. A. Gervasini, C. Messi, P. Carniti, A. Ponti, N. Ravasio, and F. Zaccheria, “Insight into the properties of Fe oxide present in high concentrations on mesoporous silica,” Journal of Catalysis, vol. 262, no. 2, pp. 224–234, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Anuja Bhalkikar et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1441 Views | 641 Downloads | 7 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19.