Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Nanomaterials
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 510376, 8 pages
Research Article

Obtaining Highly Crystalline Barium Sulphate Nanoparticles via Chemical Precipitation and Quenching in Absence of Polymer Stabilizers

1Centro de Química, Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas (IVIC), Apartado 20632, Caracas 1020-A, Venezuela
2Área de Análisis Químico Inorgánico, PDVSA, INTEVEP, Los Teques 1070-A, Venezuela
3Centro de Estudios Interdisciplinarios de la Física, Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas (IVIC), Apartado 20632, Caracas 1020-A, Venezuela

Received 26 November 2014; Revised 9 February 2015; Accepted 10 February 2015

Academic Editor: Yong Zhu

Copyright © 2015 Ángela B. Sifontes et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Here we report the synthesis of barium sulphate (BaSO4) nanoparticles from Ba(OH)2/BaCl2 solutions by a combined method of precipitation and quenching in absence of polymer stabilizers. Transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), Fourier transforms infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and X-ray diffraction (XRD) were employed to characterize the particles. The Scherrer formula was applied to estimate the particle size using the width of the diffraction peaks. The obtained results indicate that the synthesized material is mainly composed of nanocrystalline barite, with nearly spherical morphology, and diameters ranging from 4 to 92 nm. The lattice images of nanoparticles were clearly observed by HRTEM, indicating a high degree of crystallinity and phase purity. In addition, agglomerates with diameters between 20 and 300 nm were observed in both lattice images and dynamic light scattering measurements. The latter allowed obtaining the particle size distribution, the evolution of the aggregate size in time of BaSO4 in aqueous solutions, and the sedimentation rate of these solutions from turbidimetry measurements. A short discussion on the possible medical applications is presented.

1. Introduction

The baryte group consists of baryte, celestine, anglesite, and anhydrite. Baryte is a sulfate of barium with chemical formula BaSO4. It is generally white or colorless, chemically inert, insoluble in water, with high density, and the main source of barium. Although baryte contains a “heavy” metal (barium), it is not considered to be a toxic chemical reagent by most governments because of its extreme insolubility [1]. Commonly, baryte is used for the production of barium hydroxide for sugar refining and as a white pigment for textiles, paper, and paint [2]. It is also suitable for other purposes due to its high specific gravity (4.5), opaqueness to X-rays, inertness, and whiteness [3]. Recently, more attention has been paid on the massive production of BaSO4 nanoparticles for its multiple applications in the oil industry, electronics, TV screen, glass, car filters, paint industry, and ceramics [4] as well as in medical applications. In particular, barium sulfate suspension in water is used as the universal contrast medium for the examination of the upper gastrointestinal tract [5]. Currently, the development of nanoparticle-based X-ray contrast agents is providing an increasing contribution to the field of diagnostic and molecular imaging. For example, the nanoparticles surface can be modified to enhance their specificity by attaching targeting moieties, increase their circulation half-life by adding appropriate coatings (e.g., polymers, silica), and improve their functionality by adding other components, including fluorescent markers and therapeutic agents [6]. However, although significant progress has been made in preparing stable nanoparticles, their industrial production can present serious difficulties that limit their potential applications. For example, BaSO4 nanoparticles tend to form aggregates due to the high ratio surface area-volume. Expensive costs and complex methodologies also attempt against massive industrial production [3].

Among the methods to obtain nanoscaled materials, chemical synthesis has numerous advantages such as simple technique, low costs, less instrumentation, doping, and high yield [4]. These methods could be classified as (a) direct precipitation [7], (b) microemulsion [8], (c) membrane separation [9], and (d) organic modification [10]. In general, particle sizes between 16 and 50 nm can be obtained. Nonetheless, precipitation seems to be the most suitable method due to its simple procedure and ease of mass production, and less apparatus is required [11]. In spite of this, the difficulties in controlling the size, polydispersity, and strong tendency to aggregate could hinder their potential applications [11]. In this sense, it is important to find more efficient methodologies of synthesis. Accordingly, in this paper we report the synthesis and characterization of barium nanoparticles by a chemical precipitation route, in the absence of polymer stabilizers.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals and Instruments

The starting reagents barium hydroxide, barium chloride, and sulfuric acid were used as received. Double distilled water was used in all experiments. The prepared barium sulfate was characterized by transmission electron microscopy using a JEOL JEM-2100 microscope with LaB6 filament (accelerating voltage of 200 kV). The samples were prepared by suspending the powders in an ethanol-based liquid and pipetting the suspension onto a carbon/collodion coating. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were measured with a Perkin Elmer 100 spectrometer (in the range of 2000–500 cm−1) by incorporating the samples in KBr (1 : 99 mg) disks to confirm the characteristic vibrational bands. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of BaSO4 were recorded on a panalytical diffractometer, model X’Pert Pro, and CuK-α radiation in the range between 5 and 80°, operating at 40 kV and 20 mA. Phases were identified using the MATCH! 2 program (version 2.2.3, Build 361) Crystal Impact, coupled to the Release 2011 PDF-2 database [12]. PDF card number 024-1035 (or ICSD card number 33730) was used to carry out the Rietveld refinement to all the peaks [13], which were in accordance with the reported values in the literature. The structure of BaSO4 was refined with the Rietveld (1969) program GSAS [14] using the graphical interface EXPGUI [15]. The peak shapes were modeled using the pseudo-Voigt peak shape function 3, which included the axial divergence correction at low angle [16]. Background was initially determined manually and then modeled using the Chebyshev polynomial function. The isotropic atomic displacement parameters were refined as one overall for the nonoxygen atoms starting from a value of 0.05 Å2. Nevertheless, one constraint was applied to for modeling the isotropic atomic displacement parameters of oxygen atom following riding-model. The mean grain size () of the prepared BaSO4 nanoparticles was estimated from X-ray line broadening of the listed reflections in Table 1, using the Scherrer equation [17] ( where is the wavelength of the X-ray radiation, is a constant taken as 0.89, is the diffraction angle, and (rad) is the full width at half-maximum (FWHM)).

Table 1: Selected peaks employed to calculate the particles size with Scherrer’s equation. These are the nine first peaks that appearance powder pattern of BaSO4 synthesized.

Both initial particle size distribution and particles size variation were characterized by dynamic light scattering measurements (DLS) on a Brookhaven BI 9000AT goniometer. Measurements were carried out at a fixed angle of 90° using a 633 nm laser. The sedimentation rate was obtained from Turbiscan LAB software in scanning mode. The light source is an electro luminescent diode in near infrared (880 nm). Two synchronous optical sensors receive the transmitted light through the sample (180°) and the backscattered light by the sample (45°). The sample was dispersed in a deionized water solution at a phase fraction of 0.1% w/v. The suspension was sonicated during 15 min before measurement.

2.2. Preparation of the Samples

The direct precipitation (DP) procedure followed consists in adding a Ba(OH)2·8H2O solution to BaCl2·2H2O in presence of water. The molar ratio of Ba(OH)2 to BaCl2 was 3 : 1. The resulting solution was stirred at room temperature while a sulfuric acid solution (50% (v/v)) was added (step 1, precipitation). The precipitated solid material was washed and filtered four times with hot distilled water (step 2). The sample was frozen at −26°C for 24 hours. Subsequently, the supernatant liquid was carefully decanted and then a volume of distilled water was added again. This procedure was repeated 5 times. The final step involved a freeze-dry cycle and was oven-dried at 105°C for 12 hours (step 3, purification) [18]. All the experiments were performed three times in order to observe reproducibility.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1 shows the XRD pattern and final Rietveld plot of the synthesized sample. It is shown that the solid is composed of baryte. The BaSO4 crystalized in orthorhombic crystals, space group Pnma, with cell parameters  Å,  Å, and  Å. The final Rietveld refinement with the reported model gave figures of merit: , , , (249 reflections), and . Finally, the Scherrer equation was used to estimate the particle size by averaging the value of FWHM for the first nine lines of the powder pattern of BaSO4 (see Table 1). Thus, the average particle size estimated for the BaSO4 synthesized in this work was 91.72 nm.

Figure 1: XRD pattern of synthesized sample (a) and final Rietveld plot for BaSO4 (b). The continuous green line represents the calculated pattern and the red discontinuous line is the observed pattern.

TEM and HRTEM images (Figures 26) show that the sample was composed of both isolated and aggregated particles. The morphology of BaSO4 particles is nearly spherical. The nanoparticles size determined from micrographies is between 2.6 and 20 nm, with an average size of 14.5 nm. Besides, large (>20 nm) fully crystallized structures are observed. Typical sizes of aggregates were found to be about 11–300 nm (Figure 3).

Figure 2: TEM image of BaSO4 nanoparticles (a); HRTEM image showing lattice fringes of BaSO4 nanoparticles (b).
Figure 3: TEM image of BaSO4 nanoparticles (a); typical aggregates (b).
Figure 4: HRTEM image of BaSO4 nanoparticle (a); FFT power spectrum (b); masked power spectrum FFT (c); image after performing inverse FFT on the masked power spectrum (d).
Figure 5: HRTEM image of BaSO4 nanoparticles (a); FFT image (b) (particle 1), (c) (particle 2); masked power spectrum FFT (c) (particle 1), (d) (particle 2); image after performing inverse FFT on the masked power spectrum (c) and (d).
Figure 6: HRTEM image of BaSO4 nanoparticle (a); HRTEM image of BaSO4 nanoparticle (b); a magnification of the section marked with a white square in (a); FFT image (c); masked power spectrum FFT (d); image after performing inverse FFT on the masked power spectrum (e). A crystallographic representation of BaSO4 crystal (f).

In Figure 4 HRTEM analysis shows that the lattice fringes with an in interlayer distance of 0.327 nm is close to the 0.331 nm lattice spacing of the crystal planes of barite phase. This was confirmed by fast Fourier transformation (FFT) patterns, which is also in accordance with XRD results. For this study, noise reduction was performed on the square-labeled area of Figure 4(a). Masking was applied on the intense spots of the FFT power spectrum. The resulting image after performing inverse FFT on the masked power spectrum is showed in Figure 4(d).

In Figure 5(a) (nanoparticles 1, 2) HRTEM analysis shows that the lattice fringes with an interlayer distance of 0.338 nm correspond to lattice spacing of the (210) crystal planes of BaSO4, which is in accordance with XRD results. Figures 6(b) and 6(c) show a FFT of Figure 5(a), and the diffraction points can be indexed to the (210) plane. Masking was also applied on Figures 5(b) and 5(c), specifically on the intense spots of the FFT power spectrum. The resulting image (Figures 5(d) and 5(e)) was obtained after performing inverse FFT on the masked power spectrum (Figures 5(f) and 5(g)).

In the HRTEM image (Figure 6), the planar spacing obtained is 0.355 nm, corresponding to spacing for (200) planes of orthorhombic structure BaSO4. All the planar spacing determined from HRTEM images are in accordance with the database of Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards (JCPDS) card 024-1035.

Figure 7 shows the FT-IR spectra of the synthesized BaSO4 nanoparticles. It was previously mentioned that the sulfate group has four fundamental vibrational modes attributed to one nondegenerate mode (), one doubly degenerate mode (), and two triply degenerate modes ( and ). In general, the IR spectrum of baryte exhibits several significant bands [19]. Two intense bands correspond to asymmetric stretching and bending ( and ), and two weak ones correspond to symmetric stretching and bending ( and ) [19]. In the FT-IR spectra the bands centered at 1073–1185 cm−1 and the shoulder at 982 cm−1 were assigned to symmetric stretching vibration of group. At 1636 cm−1 the stretching vibration of group was identified. The peaks obtained at 609 and 637 cm−1 were attributed to the out-of-plane bending vibration of the [10, 19]. The absorption peaks appeared at 3420 cm−1 are due to antisymmetric stretching vibrations of H2O molecules localized on vacant sites of Ba. The peaks around 2000 cm−1 are overtones and a combination of stretching and bending vibrations bands of the sulphur-oxygen [20].

Figure 7: FT-IR spectra of BaSO4 nanoparticles.
3.1. Particle Size Distribution, Aggregates Size Evolution, and Sedimentation Rate

Figure 8 shows the particle size distribution from dynamic light scattering (DLS) measures of an aqueous suspension of BaSO4 nanoparticles. As can be observed, the main peak appears around 800 nm with an average size of μm. Even though the micrographies indicate a particle size less than 100 nm, the distribution shows particles sizes above 5 microns, an indicative that DLS yields an average radius of aggregates formed by several particles. The strong tendency to form aggregates was corroborated and the results are shown in Figure 9, where the time evolution of both radius and percentage of polydispersity is plotted. The average size evolves linearly with time from 1200 μm to 4200 μm in 1 h. However, the percentage of polydispersity fluctuates around 30%.

Figure 8: Particle size distribution of a BaSO4/W suspension (0.1% w/v) determined by dynamic light scattering.
Figure 9: Particle size variation of a BaSO4/W suspension (0.1% w/v) determined by dynamic light scattering.

Due to the large size of aggregates, it is expected to observe sedimentation and the results from turbidimetry can be observed in Figure 10. The photon mean free path () represents the mean distance travelled by photons before undergoing a diffusion phenomenon. Thus, the measurement is performed by the Turbiscan by sending a light beam though the cell and detecting the photons crossing the dispersion, without being diffused. Therefore as more photons cross the cell, more important is the value and the sample is more translucent, an indicative that less particles are in the beam path. The initial slope of Figure 10, corresponding to the sedimentation rate, was 412 μm/min, with a correlation coefficient of 0.99. The total average sedimentation rate in a 60 min measurement was 171 μm/min.

Figure 10: Sedimentation rate obtained from the initial slope of the photon mean free path () as a function of time.

The combined effect of forming aggregates and sedimentation could limit possible medical applications of BaSO4 nanoparticles. Nevertheless, this study was processed without any additives (including stabilizers, antioxidants, and lubricants). In this sense, in general, barium sulfate suspension oral for gastric and colonic radiological work, containing a physiologically inert stabilizer, consists of a solution of a water-soluble cellulose ether and carboxymethylcellulose and also contains a suitable penetrant of cationic origin as lauryl sulfoacetate [21]. Besides, in order to improve the possibilities of application, further studies in particle-particle interactions and the main mechanisms responsible for coarsening are necessary to implement new methodologies to obtain more kinetically stable systems. In this sense, our procedure could be optimized in order to low the polydispersity index around a particle size below 10 nm. It is also noticeable that the starting reagents have low impact toxicity, compared to others which, in some cases, make use of benzene [22]. This latter is an additional advantage of our procedure in order to use the synthesized nanoparticles in medical applications.

3.2. Formation Mechanism of BaSO4 Nanoparticles

The synthesis of barium sulfate was carried out using a mix of Ba(OH)2/BaCl2, where the barium chloride solution was added to increase the concentration of Ba2+ ions (in excess). Subsequently, with the addition of (H2SO4), BaSO4 crystals were gradually formed.

The increase in pH could result in an increase in the negative charge of BaSO4. According to Zhang et al., this could be attributed to the adsorption of OH ions on the positive charge centers of BaSO4 particles [23]. The reaction of barium (Ba2+) and sulphate () ions into barium sulphate (BaSO4) is [20, 24, 25]

In general, a precipitation process is described by processes that include the creation of a supersaturation level followed by the generation of nuclei (nucleation) and the subsequent growth [8]. A number of secondary processes like aging, ripening, agglomeration, and breakage might occur depending on the nature of the process itself and the chemical compound [8]. Moreover, in a highly supersaturated solution the instability of the system will result in a fast local concentration fluctuation [26]. Basically, there are three variables that govern the rate of nucleation: the temperature , the degree of supersaturation , and the surface energy . In this sense, if the supersaturation ratio is increased and the surface energy is decreased, the result is a higher nucleation rate, which finally leads to the formation of particles of smaller size [27, 28].

The synthesis process involves as second step a quenching. Quenching is simply cooling rapidly to a lower temperature, −26°C. The final step in the precipitation process was an artificial aging at −26°C (aging above room temperature). Temperature has a significant influence on solubility and crystal growth of barium sulphate [29]. It is then expected that the growth of particle size is stopped by quenching with cold water.

The results presented here prove that barium sulfate nanoparticles can be prepared in the absence of polymers stabilizers polymeric employing a simple methodology. Moreover, the nanomaterial synthesized has applications as a potential contrast agent for X-ray examination.

4. Conclusions

Barium sulphate nanoparticles were synthesized using a precipitation method in absence of polymer stabilizers or solvents. The XRD study shows that the synthesized nanoparticles crystallize in orthorhombic system with space group Pnma. This method allowed obtaining high purity, spherical, and morphologically homogeneous nanoparticles. X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscope (TEM), and high resolution transmission electron microscope (HRTEM) measurements confirmed an average particle size in the range from 4 to 92 nm and agglomerates with diameters between 20 and 300 nm. FTIR study shows the presence of the sulphate group in the synthesized nanoparticles. Dynamic light scattering and turbidimetry measurement indicates a strong tendency of nanoparticles to form aggregates and precipitate in aqueous solution. Finally, this methodology can be employed to synthesize BaSO4 nanoparticles for possible applications as a potential contrast agent for X-ray examination.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


The authors acknowledge financial support by IVIC through project 1077 and technical assistance of Lic. Liz Cubillán (FTIR).


  1. J. S. Hanor, “Barite-celestine geochemistry and environments of formation,” Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, vol. 40, pp. 193–275, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. Dana and W. Ford, Dana's Manual of Mineralogy For the Student of Elementary Mineralogy, the Mining Engineer, the Geologist, the Prospector, the Collector, etc, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 14th edition, 1929.
  3. Y. Shen, C. Li, X. Zhu, A. Xie, L. Qiu, and J. Zhu, “Study on the preparation and formation mechanism of barium sulphate nanoparticles modified by different organic acids,” Journal of Chemical Sciences, vol. 119, no. 4, pp. 319–324, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. V. Ramaswamy, R. M. Vimalathithan, and V. Ponnusamy, “Preparation of barium sulphate nanocrystals in ethanol—water mixed solvents,” Journal of Ceramic Processing Research, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 173–175, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. Sutton, A Textbook of Radiology and Imaging, Churchill Livingstone, London, UK, 1980.
  6. J. C. de la Vega and U. O. Häfeli, “Utilization of nanoparticles as X-ray contrast agents for diagnostic imaging applications,” Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. M. Ismaiel and I. Mostafa, “Synthesis of BaSo4 nanoparticles by precipitation method using polycarboxylate as a modifier,” American Journal of Nanotechnology, vol. 2, pp. 106–111, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  8. D. Adityawarman, A. Voigt, P. Veit, and K. Sundmacher, “Precipitation of BaSO4 nanoparticles in a non-ionic microemulsion: identification of suitable control parameters,” Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 60, no. 12, pp. 3373–3381, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. G. Wu, H. Zhou, and S. Zhu, “Precipitation of barium sulfate nanoparticles via impinging streams,” Materials Letters, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 168–170, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. Gupta, P. Singh, and C. Shivakumara, “Synthesis of BaSO4 nanoparticles by precipitation method using sodium hexa metaphosphate as a stabilizer,” Solid State Communications, vol. 150, no. 9-10, pp. 386–388, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. I. Nieto, C. Tallón, and R. Moreno, “Synthesis of gamma-alumina nanoparticles by freeze drying,” Advances in Science and Technology, vol. 45, pp. 223–230, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. H. Putz, MATCH 2-Phase Identification from Powder Diffraction, Version 2.2.3, Crystal Impact, Bonn, Germany, 2014.
  13. H. M. Rietveld, “A profile refinement method for nuclear and magnetic structures,” Journal of Applied Crystallography, vol. 2, pp. 65–71, 1969. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. A. C. Larson and R. B. von Dreele, GSAS: General Structure Analysis System, Software, The Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA, 2007.
  15. B. H. Toby, “EXPGUI, a graphical user interface for GSAS,” Journal of Applied Crystallography, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 210–213, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. L. W. Finger, D. E. Cox, and A. P. Jephcoat, “A correction for powder diffraction peak asymmetry due to axial divergence,” Journal of Applied Crystallography, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 892–900, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. S. Phoka, P. Laokul, E. Swatsitang, V. Promarak, S. Seraphin, and S. Maensiri, “Synthesis, structural and optical properties of CeO2 nanoparticles synthesized by a simple polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP) solution route,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 423–428, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. W. Armarego and D. Perrin, Laboratory Chemical, Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 4th edition, 1996.
  19. B. Prameena, G. Anbalagan, V. Sangeetha, S. Gunasekaran, and G. R. Ramkumaar, “Behaviour of Indian natural baryte mineral,” International Journal of ChemTech Research, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 220–231, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J. Manam and S. Das, “Thermally stimulated luminescence studies of undoped, Cu and Mn doped BaSO4 compounds,” Indian Journal of Pure and Applied Physics, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 435–438, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. R. B. Garland, Patent US3236735 A, 1962.
  22. V. Ramaswamy and R. M. Vimalathithan, “Ponnusamy synthesis of monodispersedbarium sulphate nanoparticles using water-benzene mixed solvent,” Advanced Materials Letters, vol. 3, pp. 29–33, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  23. M. Zhang, B. Zhang, X. Li, Z. Yin, and X. Guo, “Synthesis and surface properties of submicron barium sulfate particles,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 258, no. 1, pp. 24–29, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. R. Kieffer, D. Mangin, F. Puel, and C. Charcosset, “Precipitation of barium sulphate in a hollow fiber membrane contactor: part II the influence of process parameters,” Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 64, no. 8, pp. 1885–1891, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. A. A. Öncül, K. Sundmacher, A. Seidel-Morgenstern, and D. Thévenin, “Numerical and analytical investigation of barium sulphate crystallization,” Chemical Engineering Science, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 652–664, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. A. Myerson, Handbook of Industrial Crytallization, Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, Mass, USA, 1993.
  27. N. Tavare, Industrial Crystallization: Process Simulation Analysis and Design, Plenum Press, New York, NY, USA, 1995.
  28. A. Randolph and M. Larson, Theory of Particulate Processes, Academic Press, San Diego, Calif, USA, 2nd edition, 1988.
  29. A. B. B. Merdhah, “Laboratory study on precipitation of barium sulphate in Malaysia,” The Open Petroleum Engineering Journal, vol. 2, pp. 1–11, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus