Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Nanomaterials
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 2561326, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2561326
Research Article

Demonstration of Improved Charge Transfer in Graphene/Au Nanorods Plasmonic Hybrids Stabilized by Benzyl Thiol Linkers

1Istituto di Nanotecnologia (NANOTEC), CNR, Via Orabona 4, 70126 Bari, Italy
2Department of Chemistry, University of Bari, Via Orabona 4, 70126 Bari, Italy

Received 10 September 2015; Revised 26 November 2015; Accepted 29 November 2015

Academic Editor: Ashok K. Sundramoorthy

Copyright © 2016 Giuseppe Valerio Bianco et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Hybrids based on graphene decorated with plasmonic gold (Au) nanostructures are being investigated as possible materials combination to add to graphene functionalities of tunable plasmon resonance and enhanced absorption at selected wavelength in the visible-near-infrared region of the spectrum. Here, we report a solution drop-casting approach for fabricating stable hybrids based on chemical vapor deposition (CVD) graphene and Au nanorods, which are able to activate effective charge transfer from graphene. We demonstrate that CVD graphene functionalization by benzyl thiol (BZT) provides the linker to strong anchoring, via S-Au bonds, Au nanorods to graphene. Optical measurements by spectroscopic ellipsometry give evidence of the introduction of plasmon resonances at 1.85 and 2.25 eV in the Au nanorods/BZT/graphene hybrids, which enable surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) detection. Furthermore, an effective electron transfer from graphene to Au nanorods, resulting in an enhancement of p-type doping of graphene with a consequent decrease of its sheet resistance, is probed by Raman spectroscopy and corroborated by electrical measurements.

1. Introduction

The synergic combination of the extraordinary mechanical, thermal, and electronic properties of graphene (G) with the peculiar functionalities of metal [1], semiconductor [2], and oxide [3] nanostructures is an important field of research with promising technological perspectives. Among those hybrids, immobilization of stable plasmonic gold (Au) nanostructures onto graphene is an approach adopted to develop photoactive electrodes for solar cells [4] and electrocatalysis [5], as well as fabricate plasmonic enhanced graphene-based optical switches and photodetectors operating from the near infrared to the visible [1, 6] and SERS (surface enhanced Raman scattering) sensors [7].

Several approaches have been exploited for fabricating plasmonic hybrids based on G/Au nanostructures. For instance, nanoscale Au arrays have been fabricated on graphene by electron beam lithography [1] and wet chemical synthesis from colloidal solutions containing Au nanoparticles with a defined plasmonic response [7]. While largely used spherical Au nanoparticles have localized surface plasmon resonance (SPR) mainly in the visible range and redshifting with the increase of radius from approximately 2.5 eV down to 2.0 eV [8], Au nanorods (AuNRs) enable more interesting functions due to their anisotropic shape, which introduces splitting of the plasmon resonance in the longitudinal (L-SPR, excitation along the major axis of the AuNRs) and transverse (T-SPR, excitation along the minor radial axis of the AuNRs) modes, with the former tunable in the near-infrared range and the latter in the visible range [9]. Such peculiar tunability of AuNRs plasmonic properties in combination with graphene has demonstrated great potential for the fabrication of high sensitive and flexible surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) sensors [10, 11] and high-performance NIR photodetectors [9]. Furthermore, Au nanoparticles coupled to graphene have been demonstrated to dope graphene by electron transfer [12]. In this context, while it has been largely assumed that Au nanostructures yield p-type doping of graphene due to the difference in the work functions of Au (5.1 eV) and graphene (4.5 eV), we have recently demonstrated that the size and shape of Au nanostructures introduce changes in the Au work function that enables tailoring of graphene doping from p-type to n-type [12]. Therefore, it is important to develop scalable methods of fabrication of G/AuNRs hybrids. Nevertheless, reproducible immobilizing and stabilizing of AuNRs from colloidal solutions onto CVD graphene are still challenging. For this reason, the majority of work in literature decorates with metal nanoparticles graphene oxide [13] that uses various functional groups to anchor nanoparticles. Furthermore, capping agents, used to prevent AuNRs aggregation in solution, can inhibit the direct interaction of AuNRs with graphene.

In this work, we propose benzyl thiol (BZT) as linker for stabilizing the anchoring of colloidal AuNRs on the surface of graphene obtained by chemical vapor deposition (CVD). While BZT is linked via - stacking to graphene, a strong covalent Au-S bond binds AuNRs to BZT as schematized in Figure 1. Peculiarity of this approach is the direct drop-casting of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) capped AuNRs on BZT functionalized graphene, without performing any additional step of AuNRs capping agent exchange reaction in solution. We demonstrate the effectiveness of BZT linkers in enhancing the stability of the AuNRs/BZT/G hybrid and in activating electron transfer processes between graphene and AuNRs. To probe this electron transfer, we combine optical analyses of spectroscopic ellipsometry, which detects the plasmon response of the G/BZT/AuNRs hybrids, Raman spectroscopy, and electrical measurements of sheet resistance, which detect variation of doping of graphene. Moreover, SERS signal provides insights into the interaction of both graphene and AuNRs with BZT molecules.

Figure 1: Schematic illustration of BZT linkers anchoring Au nanorods onto graphene. The - interaction between BZT and graphene and the covalent S-Au bonds are indicated by dashed lines. The inset also shows the transmission electron microscopy image of the AuNRs.

2. Experimental

The graphene used in this work was grown by CVD on 25 mm thick copper foils in a quartz tube CVD reactor at 1000°C (heating rate of 20° min−1) using CH4 and H2 as precursors (CH4 : H2 = 100 : 50) at a pressure of 4 Torr [14]. Samples were then cooled at a rate of ~2°C min−1 in 1 Torr of H2. The graphene was transferred onto glass substrates by the thermal release tape method [15], etching the copper substrate in a water solution of ammonium persulphate (0.1 M).

Graphene functionalization with BZT (Sigma-Aldrich, product code B25401) was carried out by dipping for 30 min graphene in a 1 M solution of BZT in CH2Cl2 (Sigma-Aldrich, product code 650463) and subsequent rinsing with CH2Cl2. AuNRs were deposited on graphene by drop-casting 0.5 mL of a water solution of CTAB stabilized AuNRs (Sigma-Aldrich, product code 716855-25ML, diluted to a concentration of 113 μg/mL). After water evaporation, the samples were subjected to three cycles of water (type II) rinsing.

AuNRs with transversal and longitudinal sizes of 25 nm and 50 nm, respectively, were used in our experiments (as shown in the image of Figure 1), with the L-SPR and T-SPR modes expected at 1.98–2.15 eV and 2.23–2.45 eV, respectively [16].

Electrical measurements of sheet resistance, which give indication of graphene doping, were carried out using a four-point contact geometry in the van der Pauw configuration (MMR Technologies, Inc.) on a 5 × 5 mm2 sampled area.

Raman spectra were collected using a LabRAM HR Horiba-Jobin Yvon spectrometer with the 532 nm and 633 nm excitation lasers to probe SERS effects in the AuNRs/G hybrids.

Ellipsometric spectra of the complex pseudodielectric function and extinction coefficient, , were acquired using a phase-modulated spectroscopic ellipsometer (UVISEL, Horiba-Jobin Yvon) in the 0.75–6.0 eV spectral range with a resolution of 0.01 eV to detect the plasmon resonance behavior of the AuNRs/G hybrids.

Atomic force microscopy (AFM, Thermomicroscope) was also used to probe the morphology of the hybrids.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 2(a) shows the ellipsometric spectra of the pseudoextinction coefficient, , of CVD graphene supported on glass substrate before and after decoration with BZT and AuNRs. For comparison, the spectra of the AuNRs/BZT/G hybrid after three cycles of water immersion (30 min), rinsing, and drying, as well as the spectrum of the same AuNRs and of spherical Au nanoparticles with the same radial dimension of 25 nm directly on glass, are also shown. The spectrum of the pristine graphene is dominated by an intense asymmetric peak around 4.8 eV, referred to as Van Hove peak, which mainly derives from the electron interband transitions at the M-point of the Brillouin zone [17]. Both graphene and glass being almost transparent in the energy range below 3.2 eV, the longitudinal (L-SPR) and transverse plasmon resonance (T-SPR) modes of the AuNRs, respectively, at 1.85 and 2.25 eV are clearly visible in the spectra. Those localized SPR modes originate from the collective and coherent oscillations of the Au electron plasmon along the nanorod long and radial axes [18]. This assignment is supported by the comparison with the only SPR mode at 2.25 eV of the spherical Au nanoparticles with the same radial size of 25 nm (see red spectrum of AuNPs/glass in Figure 2(a)).

Figure 2: (a) Spectra of the pseudoextinction coefficient, , of CVD graphene supported on glass (black spectrum), of AuNRs directly drop-cast on graphene, and AuNRs/G (green spectrum), of the Au rods/BZT/G hybrid before (blue spectrum) and after (AuNRs/BZT/G) H2O (cyan spectrum) water rinsing. For comparison, the spectra of the AuNRs directly drop-cast on glass (and therefore with the capping CTAB) (magenta spectrum) and after thermal annealing to remove the CTAB capping (red spectrum) are also shown. (b) Evolution of the ratio between and (the latter being the intensity soon after drop-casting of AuNRs) upon three cycles of water immersion (30 min), rinsing, and drying. (c, d, e, f) Optical images of the surface morphologies of the (c, e) AuNRs/G and (d, f) AuNRs/BZT/G hybrids. The insets in (a) show the 400 nm × 400 nm AFM images of AuNRs on BZT/G (left image) and of the annealed AuNRs/glass sample resulting in a change to spherical nanoparticles (right image).

The higher intensity of the spectrum of the AuNRs/G (AuNRs with the CTAB capping directly drop-cast on the graphene) is due to the inclusion of the CTAB, and the decreased spectrum of the AuNRs/BZT/G is because the BZT has been effective in displacing the CTAB. This can also be inferred by the comparison of the spectra of the AuNRs directly drop-cast on glass: in this case the CTAB has been removed by thermal annealing of the sample, so that a decrease of the spectrum amplitude by the CTAB removal is observed (see magenta and red spectra in Figure 2(a)). Noteworthy, the annealing also resulted in aggregation and melting of AuNRs that were transformed in spherical nanoparticles, as confirmed by the disappearance of the longitudinal SPR mode and appearance of only a SPR peak characteristic of spherical nanoparticles (see red spectrum of AuNPs/glass in Figure 2(a)). Furthermore, the spectra of AuNRs/BZT/G hybrid before and after three cycles of water treatment are almost coincident, indicating that the AuNRs are stabilized through the BZT linker on the graphene. The slight observed variation in the amplitude of the spectra (compare blue and cyan spectra in Figure 2(a)) may be ascribed to the removal of some nanorods by solvation and/or to the removal of further CTAB residual from the sample. Figure 2(b) shows that when BZT is used as linker (blue points), the occurrence of such slight modification is limited to the first water immersion and rinsing cycle.

Conversely, when AuNRs are drop-cast directly on graphene, the ratio between and decreases to a value around 0.5 after three cycles of water treatment. Such decrease in the amplitude of the T-SPR of AuNRs could be related to a decrease of the surface density of the AuNRs due to their partial transfer into solution and/or aggregation upon solvation. In particular, the formation of AuNRs aggregates is a thermodynamically favored process whose driving force is the minimization of the high surface tension of isolated nanostructures.

In order to investigate the surface morphologies of the hybrids, we have taken advantage of the intense scattering in the visible of the plasmonic AuNRs to provide fast and direct information on their surface density and distribution on a large area by using a simple optical microscope. The optical photographs in Figures 2(c) and 2(d) confirm the presence of AuNRs aggregates (white spots in the pictures) of different sizes on both the AuNRs/G and AuNRs/BZT/G samples. However, without the BZT linker, the AuNRs aggregates are inhomogeneously distributed on the graphene (Figure 2(c)). The AFM topography in the inset of Figure 2(a) (left image) shows the presence of AuNRs with a height of 25 nm, corresponding to the lower axis of the AuNR, and lateral sizes of approximately 100 nm, which can be associated with a single AuNR and/or aggregates of two rods. Moreover, by further lowering the microscope optical magnification, it is possible to notice that the surface distribution of AuNRs directly drop-cast on graphene defines a patched morphology (Figure 2(e)) that cannot be observed in the hybrid with BZT (Figure 2(f)). Although CVD graphene is a polycrystalline material, the sizes of such patches are not compatible with the grain sizes estimated for the CVD graphene produced in our laboratory [2]. The observed patched morphology is more consistent with the morphology of CVD graphene wrinkles [19], formed during graphene growth (at the Cu substrate step edges due to thermal stress) as well as during transferring to the glass substrate (especially for transferring of large area graphene samples) [19].

Figure 3 shows the Raman spectrum (red line) acquired for the AuNRs/BZT/G hybrid using a laser excitation source at 633 nm (1.96 eV, which is in the proximity of the L-SPR peak). For comparison, the reference Raman spectrum of BZT (black line) with the assignment of the most prominent Raman modes [20] is also shown. The graphene 2D Raman mode can be observed at 2660 cm−1. Below 1600 cm−1 the spectra are characterized by several peaks due to BZT, with the mode of BZT overlapping the graphene G-peak at 1582 cm−1. The high intensity of the BZT Raman peaks is due to SERS Raman scattering signal enhanced by the AuNRs. In fact, these SERS peaks are minimized, and only the graphene Raman modes are visible, when a laser excitation source at 2.33 eV (532 nm), above the AuNRs plasmon resonance, is used (see blue spectrum in Figure 4(a)). The SERS enhancement is minimized using such laser energy because of the lower ratio of scattering to absorption from photons interacting with AuNRs [21], due to the higher contribution of the gold interband transitions absorption [22].

Figure 3: Raman spectrum of AuNRs/BZT/G acquired with a laser source operating at 633 nm (red spectrum). The reference Raman spectrum of BZT (black spectrum) is also reported for comparison.
Figure 4: (a) Raman spectra of pristine graphene on glass (black spectrum), graphene functionalized with BZT (red spectrum), and the AuNRs/BZT/G hybrid. (b) Spectra of pristine graphene (black spectrum) and of the AuNRs/G hybrid (blue spectrum). Spectra have been acquired with the 532 nm laser source.

Furthermore, considering that SERS enhancement is a function of the distance between the probed molecule (BZT in this case) and the plasmonic antenna (AuNRs in this case) and that it decays for a distance higher than 1.2 nm [23] (i.e., less than half the length of a fully extended CTAB molecule), the presence of the BZT SERS modes in Figure 3 indicates the proximity of the BZT as well as of graphene to the AuNRs antenna, and hence that BZT has been effective in replacing the CTAB capping. Moreover, the absence of the peak in the SERS spectra demonstrates the covalent attachment of the BZT to the Au surface as thiolate by losing its proton.

The Raman analysis has also been exploited for investigating the effectiveness of charge transfer between graphene and AuNRs stabilized by BZT linkers. Specifically, the relative stiffening and softening of the G and 2D Raman modes are indicative of a change in the charge carrier concentration in graphene [24]. Such dependence on doping of the position of the graphene Raman modes has been reported for Raman analysis performed with laser sources operating at different energies [25] (including 1.96 eV, 633 nm). However, here, to minimize the contribution of the SERS mode of BZT and to better estimate the graphene G-peak position, a laser source at 2.33 eV (532 nm) has been preferred. Figure 4(a) shows the Raman spectra of graphene as transferred onto the glass substrate (black line), after BZT drop-casting (red line), and after AuNRs anchoring (blue line). Upon BZT functionalization, a redshift of both the G and 2D peaks, from 1582 to 1579 cm−1 and from 2679 to 2676 cm−1, respectively, is measured, which is consistent with a decrease in the intrinsic p-doping characterizing CVD graphene [24]. This is also corroborated by an increase in the graphene sheet resistance from 1670 to 2500 /sq. The intrinsic p-doping of pristine CVD graphene mainly derives from the adsorption of water molecules or other contaminants from air, which act as hole-dopants [26]. Conversely, the doping effect of monosubstituted benzenes, such as the BZT, depends on the electron-donating or electron-withdrawing character of their substituents defined by their Hammett constant [27]. In particular, a negligible doping effect is expected for adsorbed BZT because of the low positive value (0.12) of its Hammett constant. Therefore, the observed changes in Raman modes and sheet resistance can be ascribed to the occurrence of a strong and stable - interaction between graphene and BZT also able to displace the previously adsorbed air contaminants on graphene. Moreover, the stiffening of the G (1586 cm−1) and 2D (2684 cm−1) Raman modes in the spectra of the AuNRs/BZT/G hybrid (blue line) demonstrates that the anchoring of AuNRs by BZT also promotes electron transfer from graphene to AuNRs consistently with the work function of gold (5.1 eV is the theoretical reported value, while 4.75 eV is the experimental value measured by us by Kelvin probe microscopy) [12] higher than that of graphene (4.5 eV) [12]. Thus, AuNRs act as p-dopants and lead to a decrease of the graphene sheet resistance (from 2500 to 850 /sq).

In contrast, when AuNRs are directly drop-cast on graphene, without the BZT, the G-peak in Raman spectrum remains stable at 1583 cm−1 (Figure 4(b)) and no changes in the sheet resistance are observed. This can be due to the fact that any direct interaction and charge transfer between the graphene and AuNRs are inhibited by the AuNRs capping agent (CTAB), by the spatial confinement of Au nanorods on graphene wrinkles as well as by the contaminants adsorbed on graphene.

4. Conclusions

BZT molecules are effective in stabilizing gold nanorods on graphene and in preventing their aggregation on the surface. The longitudinal and transverse plasmon resonance modes detected by spectroscopic ellipsometry together with the Van Hove singularity of graphene have demonstrated the formation of plasmonic AuNRs/BZT/G hybrids. The linker BZT anchors to graphene by - stacking and it anchors gold nanorods by strong covalent Au-S bonds as demonstrated by Raman analysis. Raman and van der Pauw measurements have also demonstrated an effective electron transfer from the Au nanorods to graphene, which is useful to lower the sheet resistance of graphene. Thus, BZT functionalization is an effective and simple methodology for engineering optical and transport properties of stable and large area graphene/metal nanoparticles plasmonic systems.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge funding from the European Commission Seventh Framework Programme under Grant Agreement no. 314578 “MEM4WIN” and the National Laboratory Sens & Micro LAB Project (POFESR 2007–2013, Code no. 15) funded by Apulia Region.

References

  1. Z. Fang, Y. Wang, Z. Liu et al., “Plasmon-induced doping of graphene,” ACS Nano, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 10222–10228, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. C. Ingrosso, G. V. Bianco, M. Corricelli et al., “Photoactive hybrid material based on pyrene functionalized PbS nanocrystals decorating CVD monolayer graphene,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 4151–4159, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. X. Meng, D. Geng, J. Liu, R. Li, and X. Sun, “Controllable synthesis of graphene-based titanium dioxide nanocomposites by atomic layer deposition,” Nanotechnology, vol. 22, no. 16, Article ID 165602, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. H. Hoshi, S. Tanaka, and T. Miyoshi, “Pt-graphene electrodes for dye-sensitized solar cells,” Materials Science and Engineering B: Advanced Functional Solid-State Materials, vol. 190, pp. 47–51, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  5. W. Hong, H. Bai, Y. Xu, Z. Yao, Z. Gu, and G. Shi, “Preparation of gold nanoparticle/graphene composites with controlled weight contents and their application in biosensors,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 114, no. 4, pp. 1822–1826, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. Q. Bao, K. P. Loh, G. Eda, and M. Chhowalla, “Graphene photonics, plasmonics, and broadband optoelectronic devices,” ACS Nano, vol. 6, pp. 3677–3694, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. Y. Zhang, T. R. Nayak, H. Hong, and W. Cai, “Graphene: a versatile nanoplatform for biomedical applications,” Nanoscale, vol. 4, pp. 3833–3842, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. S. K. Ghosh and T. Pal, “Interparticle coupling effect on the surface plasmon resonance of gold nanoparticles: from theory to applications,” Chemical Review, vol. 107, pp. 4797–4862, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. Z. Xia, P. Li, Y. Wang, T. Song, Q. Zhang, and B. Sun, “Solution-processed gold nanorods integrated with graphene for near-infrared photodetection via hot carrier injection,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 7, no. 43, pp. 24136–24141, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. R. S. Norman, J. W. Stone, A. Gole, C. J. Murphy, and T. L. Sabo-Attwood, “Targeted photothermal lysis of the Pathogenic bacteria, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, with gold nanorods,” Nano Letters, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 302–306, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. T. H. D. Nguyen, Z. Zhang, A. Mustapha, H. Li, and M. Lin, “Use of graphene and gold nanorods as substrates for the detection of pesticides by surface enhanced raman spectroscopy,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 62, no. 43, pp. 10445–10451, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. M. Giangregorio, W. Jiao, G. V. Bianco et al., “Insights into the effects of metal nanostructuring and oxidation on the work function and charge transfer of metal/graphene hybrids,” Nanoscale, vol. 7, no. 30, pp. 12868–12877, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. J. Liu, S. Fu, B. Yuan, Y. Li, and Z. Deng, “Toward a universal ‘Adhesive Nanosheet’ for the assembly of multiple nanoparticles based on a protein-induced reduction/decoration of graphene oxide,” Journal of American Chemical Society, vol. 32, pp. 7279–7281, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  14. M. Losurdo, M. M. Giangregorio, P. Capezzuto, and G. Bruno, “Ellipsometry as a real-time optical tool for monitoring and understanding graphene growth on metals,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 115, no. 44, pp. 21804–21812, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. D. Caldwell, T. J. Anderson, J. C. Culbertson et al., “Technique for the dry transfer of epitaxial graphene onto arbitrary substrates,” ACS Nano, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1108–1114, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. K. Moth-Poulsen, T. Jain, J. K. Sørensen, and T. Bjørnholm, “Electronics and self-assembly with single molecules,” Material Matters, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 80–82, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  17. V. G. Kravets, A. N. Grigorenko, R. R. Nair et al., “Spectroscopic ellipsometry of graphene and an exciton-shifted van Hove peak in absorption,” Physical Review B, vol. 81, no. 15, Article ID 155413, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. S. A. Maier, Plasmonics: Fundamentals and Applications, Springer, 2007.
  19. V. E. Calado, G. F. Schneider, A. M. M. G. Theulings, C. Dekker, and L. M. K. Vandersypen, “Formation and control of wrinkles in graphene by the wedging transfer method,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 101, no. 10, Article ID 103116, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. C. A. Szafranski, W. Tanner, P. E. Laibinis, and R. L. Garrell, “Surface-enhanced raman spectroscopy of aromatic thiols and disulfides on gold electrodes,” Langmuir, vol. 14, no. 13, pp. 3570–3579, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. W. Lee, S. Y. Lee, R. M. Briber, and O. Rabin, “Self-assembled SERS substrates with tunable surface plasmon resonances,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 21, no. 18, pp. 3424–3429, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M. Losurdo, M. M. Giangregorio, G. V. Bianco et al., “Size dependence of the dielectric function of silicon-supported plasmonic gold nanoparticles,” Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, vol. 82, no. 15, Article ID 155451, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. K. A. Willets and R. P. Van Duyne, “Localized surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy and sensing,” Annual Review of Physical Chemistry, vol. 58, pp. 267–297, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. A. Das, S. Pisana, B. Chakraborty et al., “Monitoring dopants by Raman scattering in an electrochemically top-gated graphene transistor,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 210–215, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. Bruna, A. K. Ott, M. Ijäs, D. Yoon, U. Sassi, and A. C. Ferrari, “Doping dependence of the Raman spectrum of defected graphene,” ACS Nano, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 7432–7441, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. G. V. Bianco, M. Losurdo, M. M. Giangregorio, P. Capezzuto, and G. Bruno, “Exploring and rationalising effective n-doping of large area CVD-graphene by NH3,” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 3632–3639, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. B. Das, R. Voggu, C. S. Rout, and C. N. R. Rao, “Changes in the electronic structure and properties of graphene induced by molecular charge-transfer,” Chemical Communications, no. 41, pp. 5155–5157, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus