Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Nanomaterials
Volume 2018 (2018), Article ID 4719790, 10 pages
Research Article

Efficient Delivery of Therapeutic siRNA with Nanoparticles Induces Apoptosis in Prostate Cancer Cells

1Department of Central Laboratory, China-Japan Union Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130021, China
2College of Pharmacy, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130021, China
3Department of Urology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130021, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Kebang Hu; moc.621@uh_gnabek

Received 18 September 2017; Revised 28 January 2018; Accepted 17 February 2018; Published 15 April 2018

Academic Editor: Jorge Pérez-Juste

Copyright © 2018 Xupeng Mu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Gene silencing using small interfering RNA (siRNA) has shown significant potential in the treatment of cancer. Herein, we developed the lipid-polymer hybrid nanoparticles (PEG-LP/siRNA NPs) for siRNA delivery. The cell viability assay indicated that PEG-LP/siRNA NPs had negligible cell cytotoxicity. The cellular uptake efficiency of PEG-LP/siRNA NPs measured by flow cytometry was up to 94.4%. Importantly, in vitro gene knockdown experiments demonstrated that PEG-LP/siJnk-1 NPs could significantly downregulate the expression of Jnk-1 at both the mRNA and protein levels in DU145 cells. Gene knockdown of Jnk-1 could activate apoptosis in part by the mitochondrial pathway in DU145 cells. Moreover, the PEG-LP/siJnk-1 NPs could inhibit tumor growth in a DU145 xenograft murine model, suggesting its therapeutic promise in cancer therapy.

1. Introduction

With the capability to silence targeted gene of interest, small interfering RNA (siRNA) has garnered much interest as a potential drug for treatment of various diseases including cancer [1, 2]. Mutated tumor suppressor genes, oncogenes, and many other genes involved in tumor progression are good targets for gene silencing due to the high specificity of gene silencing by siRNA and lack side effects compared to chemotherapies. Meanwhile, siRNA could target multiple genes of various cellular pathways involved in the growth and proliferation of cancer cells. For cancer treatment, simultaneous silencing of multiple target genes is an effective approach, which could reduce the multiple drugs’ resistance caused by overdose of chemotherapy drugs. Meanwhile, gene silencing by siRNA could develop the suitable personalized drugs for the specific patient in the future. However, some deficiencies of siRNA hampered its development in clinical application: fast RNase degradation, poor membrane permeability, and rapid elimination from systemic circulation [35]. Therefore, the most pressing mission for transferring siRNA into clinical application is the exploitation of efficient and safe delivery vehicles.

To overcome these obstacles, many approaches including virus-based and nonviral carriers have been used to conjugate or encapsulate siRNA for gene silencing. Virus-based carriers enabled stable gene silencing efficacy in vivo [6, 7]. However, virus-based carriers were associated with concerns of potential inherent toxicity and immunogenicity [8, 9]. Recent studies showed that nonviral carriers including liposomes, cationic polymers, or dendrimers could be able to deliver siRNA molecules for gene silencing [1015]. Among them, polyethylenimine (PEI), the most widely used cationic polymer, has been proven to be an effective nonviral vector for the delivery of siRNA in vitro and in vivo, which was able to load siRNA by electrostatic interaction [16, 17]. However, the inherent cytotoxicity of PEI hindered its applications when utilizing high molecular weight PEI to deliver siRNA into mammalian cells [18]. To overcome this drawback, several approaches were made such as conjugating with biocompatible or biodegradable polymers or incorporating PEI into the polymer matrix [19, 20]. As an FDA-approved nontoxic and biocompatible polymer, poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) has been widely used to encapsulate drugs or genes efficiently [21, 22].

The c-Jun NH2-terminal kinases (Jnks) belong to the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase family. Jnk was believed to participate in the important cellular processes such as autophagy, metabolism, DNA-damage response, and apoptosis [23, 24]. Several studies have reported that the aberrant activation of Jnk could reveal oncogenic features, and siJnk-1 could inhibit the growth and induce apoptosis in some tumor cells such as MCF-7 breast carcinoma cell by mitochondrial caspase-dependent pathway [25, 26]. Jnk is drawing increasing attention as a promising target of anticancer therapy.

Based on this background, in this study, we aimed to design and synthesize an effective nanocarrier for siRNA delivery. We firstly developed a PLGA polymer core containing PEI/siRNA NPs. And then lipophilic tails of DSPE-PEG were self-assembled on the NPs via hydrophobic interactions in order to improve the biocompatibility and prolong the circulation time. The physicochemical properties of the NPs, including siRNA binding capacity and hydrodynamic diameter, were characterized. In vitro toxicity, intracellular uptake, and the antitumor effects of siJnk-1 silencing in a DU145 xenograft murine model were also investigated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Polyethylenimine, ethylenediamine branched (Mw = 800 Da) (PEI), ester-terminated poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA, viscosity of 0.26–0.54 dL/g), and 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (MO, USA). 1,2-Distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-N-[methoxy(polyethyleneglycol)-3000] (DSPE-PEG) with PEG molecular weight 3000 was purchased from Seebio Biological (Shanghai, China). SiRNA targeting Jnk-1 (sense: 5′-GCGACGACCUUACAGAGCGUU-3′; antisense: 5′-CGCUCUGUAAGGUCG UCGCUU-3′; named siJnk-1), negative control siRNA (sense: 5′-UUCUCCGAA CGUGUCACGUdTdT-3′; named siN.C.), and fluorescein- (FAM-) labeled siRNA (sense: 5′-UUCUCCGAACGUGUCACGUTT-3′; named FAM-siRNA) were acquired from GenePharma Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Anti-pro-caspase-3, anti-pro-caspase-9, anti-Jnk-1, anti-bax, anti-bcl-2, anti-cytochrome C, and anti-β-actin were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. (CA, USA). IRDye® 680 goat anti-mouse IgG and IRDye 680 goat anti-rabbit IgG were purchased from Li-COR Biosciences Inc. (NE, USA). All other chemical reagents including tetrahydrofuran (THF) were purchased from Guangzhou Chemical Reagent Factory (Guangdong, China).

2.2. Cell and Animals

Human prostate cancer DU145 cell lines were obtained from ATCC (VA, USA). All cell lines were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 mg mL−1 streptomycin, and 100 U mL−1 penicillin and incubated in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37°C.

BALB/c nude mice (4-5 weeks old) were purchased from Vital River Company (Beijing, China) and were maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions in plastic cages. The animals were treated according to the ethical guidelines of Jilin University after obtaining approval from the Animal Care and Use Committee of Jilin University. All animal experiments were performed in compliance with the internationally accepted animal care guidelines.

2.3. Preparation of Lipid-Polymer Hybrid (PEG-LP/siRNA) NPs

The siRNA-encapsulated lipid-polymer hybrid NPs were synthesized by a simple self-assembly method. Firstly, 4 mg PLGA and 0.8 mg cationic polymer PEI were dissolved in 1 mL THF solvent. Then 50 uL siRNA (4 nmol) was added to THF solution to form PEI/siRNA nanocomplexes. Next, the reaction mixture was added dropwise into a 15 mL aqueous solution containing DSPE-PEG under stirring until the NPs formed. The residual THF in the suspension was evaporated by continuously stirring at room temperature. Then, the prepared NPs were collected using 100 kDa MWCO Amicon ultratubes (Millipore, MA, USA) and concentrated in PBS solution.

2.4. Characterization of PEG-LP/siRNA NPs

The morphology of prepared NPs was characterized using transmission electron microscope (TEM) (Hitachi H-800 Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) operated at 80 kV. The size and its distribution of prepared NPs were assessed by Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) (Malvern Zetasizer Nano Instrument, Malvern, UK).

2.5. Gel Retardation Assay

Gel retardation assay was used to assess the siRNA loading ability of the PEG-LP/siRNA NPs. PEG-LP/siRNA NPs were prepared at different N/P ratios (molar ratios of cationic amino groups of PEI to phosphate groups of siRNA) ranging from 0 to 10 (siRNA concentration was fixed at 100 nM). After forming nanocomplexes as described above, 20 uL formed PEG-LP/siRNA NPs was loaded into 1% agarose gel containing 0.5 ug mL−1 ethidium bromide. Electrophoresis was performed at 100 V in 1x TAE buffer (pH 8.3, containing 40 mM Tris base, 20 mM acetic acid, 1 mM EDTA) for 20 min and visualized under a UV illuminator (Bio-Rad Laboratories, CA, USA).

2.6. siRNA Encapsulation Efficiency

The encapsulation efficiency of siRNA in the PEG-LP/siRNA NPs was evaluated by measuring the concentration of unencapsulated siRNA in the supernatant. In brief, nanocomplexes prepared with FAM-siRNA were centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 10 min, and then the fluorescence intensity of FAM-siRNA ( = 480/520 nm) in supernatant was measured using a BioTek Synergy HT Multi-Mode Microplate Reader (Bio-Rad Laboratories, CA, USA). The encapsulation efficiency of siRNA was calculated as follows: encapsulation efficiency (%) = , where and were the fluorescence intensity of siRNA used for encapsulation and in the supernatant, respectively.

2.7. Cellular Uptake Efficiency of PEG-LP/siRNA NPs

Cellular uptake efficiency of siRNA in vitro was quantitatively evaluated by flow cytometry. DU145 cells (2 × 105 cells/well) were seeded in 6-well plates and incubated overnight. Then, the medium was replaced with fresh DMEM medium which contained various FAM-siRNA formulations including naked siRNA, PEG-LP/siRNA NPs, or lipofectamine 2000/siRNA (Lipo2K/siRNA) at siRNA concentration of 10 nM. After 6 h incubation, cells were washed with PBS, trypsinized, harvested by centrifugation, and resuspended in PBS. For each run, the fluorescence of FAM-siRNA per 1 × 105 cells was analyzed on a FACS Calibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, NJ, USA). The proportion of FAM positive cells in each run was equivalent to the cellular uptake efficiency of siRNA. The untreated cells were used as the control.

2.8. Intracellular Distribution of PEG-LP/siRNA NPs

Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) was employed to study the intracellular distribution of PEG-LP/siRNA NPs. In brief, DU145 cells (1 × 105 cells/well) were seeded into confocal dishes and incubated overnight. Then, PEG-LP/siRNA NPs containing FAM-siRNA (10 nM) was added. After incubation for 6 h or 24 h, cells were washed with PBS, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde. To label the cell nucleus, samples were incubated with 1 g mL−1 DAPI (Beyotime, Jiangsu, China) for 10 min in PBS, followed by rinsing with PBS. Intracellular distribution of FAM-siRNA was observed with an Olympus FluoView 500 confocal microscope (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).

2.9. In Vitro Cytotoxicity of PEG-LP/siN.C. NPs

The CCK-8 assay was used to assess the cytotoxicity of PEG-LP/siN.C. NPs. Firstly, DU145 cells were seeded at 1 × 104 cells per well in a 96-well plate and incubated overnight at 37°C. The medium of each well was replaced with fresh DMEM medium containing PEG-LP/siN.C. NPs or PEG-LP/siJnk-1 NPs at a series of siRNA concentrations (1 nM, 5 nM, 10 nM, 25 nM, and 50 nM). After 24 h incubation, 200 uL medium was removed and 10 μL of CCK-8 was added to each well for another 2 h treatment. Finally, the absorbance was read on an ELx-800 Microplate Reader (BioTek Instruments, VT, USA) at 450 nm. The cell viability (%) was calculated as follows: cell viability (%) = , where and were the absorbance of the test sample and the control, respectively. Experiments were performed in triplicate and the decrease of cell viability represented the increase of cell cytotoxicity.

2.10. Cell Apoptosis Analysis In Vitro

DU145 cells cultured in 6-well plates were treated with PEG-LP/siJnk-1 NPs or PEG-LP/siN.C. NPs (siRNA concentration of 50 nM). After treatment for 72 h, the cell suspension was mixed thoroughly with 5 uL of fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled Annexin V (Annexin V-FITC) and 5 uL of propidium iodide (PI) (Proteintech Group, Inc., Hubei, China) for 15 min in the dark. Apoptotic cells were detected by flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, NJ, USA).

2.11. In Vitro Gene Silencing with PEG-LP/siJnk-1 NPs

Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was used to assess Jnk-1 silencing effects after PEG-LP/siJnk-1 NPs treatment. DU145 cells were transfected with PBS, naked siJnk-1, PEG-LP/siN.C. NPs, Lipo2K/siJnk-1, or PEG-LP/siJnk-1 NPs (siJnk-1 concentration of 10 nM). After 24 h incubation, total RNA from cells was extracted using RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Duesseldorf, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. 2 ug RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA using the PrimeScript™ 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Takara, Otsu, Japan). Then, qRT-PCR was performed using SYBR Green PCR reagents on an ABI PCR System 9700 (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA). The amplification procedure was as follows: 95°C, 10 min; 94°C, 30 sec; 60°C, 30 sec; 72°C, 45 sec; 40 cycles. The primers used in the PCR reactions were as follows: Jnk-1-forward, CGTCTGGTGGAAGGAGAGAG, Jnk-1-reverse, TAATAACGGGGGTGGAGGAT; and β-actin-forward, GAAATCGTGCGTGACATCAAAG, β-actin-reverse, TGTAGT TTCATGGATGCCACAG. All of the gene expression values were normalized to those of β-actin and calculated using the method. All reactions were performed in triplicate.

2.12. Western Blot Analysis

DU145 cells were treated as described for the qRT-PCR analysis and were harvested at 72 h after transfection. Then the cells were washed with cold PBS and resuspended in 100 uL of lysis buffer (pH 7.4, containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, 1% SDS, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM PMSF, 1% Triton X-100). The cell lysates were incubated on ice for 30 min, and the supernatants were collected after centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C. Protein concentration was determined using a BCA Protein Assay Kit according to the protocol (Beyotime Inc., Jiangsu, China). Total protein (100 ug) was separated on 10% SDS-PAGE and then transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (Millipore, MA, USA) at 200 mA. After blocking with 5% nonfat dry milk in TBST (pH 7.4, containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween-20) for 1 h, the membranes were incubated with anti-pro-caspase-3, anti-pro-caspase-9, anti-Jnk-1, anti-bax, anti-bcl-2, anti-cytochrome C, or anti-β-actin monoclonal antibody (1 : 1000) overnight at 4°C, respectively. The membranes were further incubated with IRDye 680 goat anti-mouse IgG or anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (1 : 10,000) for 3 h at room temperature and visualized using an Odyssey infrared imaging system (LI-COR Biosciences, NE, USA).

2.13. In Vivo Tumor Cell Apoptosis and Therapeutic Efficacy

To establish the prostate cancer xenograft tumor model, 1 × 107 DU145 cells in 100 uL PBS were subcutaneously injected into the backs of BALB/c nude mice. When the tumor volume (; mm3) reached approximately 50 mm3 ( = 1/2 × width2  × length, measured using a caliper), mice were randomly divided into 4 groups (five mice per group). Animals were treated with PBS, PEG-LP NPs, PEG-LP/siN.C. NPs, or PEG-LP/siJnk-1 NPs by intravenous injection at a dose of 600 ug siRNA per kg of mouse weight every other day for 20 days. Tumor sizes were measured every 4 days. Four days after the last administration, the mice were sacrificed and tissues including heart, liver, spleen, lung, kidney, tumors were collected for further analysis.

2.14. Immunohistochemical Analysis

Tumor tissues and other major organs (heart, liver, spleen, lung, and kidney) were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned for analysis after various treatments. The frozen tissue slides were further stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) following the standard protocol and examined using an Olympus IX5-RFACA fluorescence microscope (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).

Apoptosis in the tumor sections following various treatments was analyzed using the terminal deoxyribonucleotidyl transferase- (TdT-) mediated dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) assay according to the manufacturer’s suggested protocol (Roche, Basel, Switzerland).

2.15. Statistical Analysis

All data were presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) and analyzed by using Student’s -test. A value of was considered statistically significant.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Preparation and Characterization of PEG-LP/siRNA NPs

The siRNA-encapsulated lipid-polymer hybrid NPs (PEG-LP/siRNA NPs) were prepared using a simple self-assembly precipitation method. Figure 1(a) illustrated the structure of the lipid-polymer hybrid NPs. Firstly, aqueous siRNA was mixed with THF solution containing cationic polymer PEI and PLGA polymer in a 1 : 50 volume ratio. The cationic polymer PEI could bind the negatively charged siRNA and then self-assembled quickly into PEI/siRNA nanocomplexes (PEI/siRNA) with a size of about 30 nm (Figure 1(b)). Subsequently, the prepared composite materials in THF solution were rapidly added to an aqueous solution containing DSPE-PEG. As expected, the PLGA polymer and PEI/siRNA complex were coprecipitated to form the polymeric NPs, which should be composed of PLGA-PEI/siRNA inner core and a DSPE-PEG outer shell.

Figure 1: Characterization of the PEG-LP/siRNA NPs. (a) Schematic diagram of the prepared NPs structure. (b) Mean particle size of the prepared NPs measured by DLS. (c) Gel retardation assay of siRNA complexed with nanoparticles at different N/P ratios. (d) Transmission electron microscopic image of prepared NPs.

To determine if the lipid-polymer hybrid NPs could complex negatively charged siRNA, a gel retardation assay was conducted after incubating the nanoparticles with siRNA (100 nM) at different N/P ratios. As shown in Figure 1(c), PEG-LP/siRNA NPs were able to encapsulate siRNA in a dose-dependent manner with complete complexation at an N/P ratio of 10 or greater.

The morphology of the PEG-LP/siRNA NPs formed at an N/P ratio of 10 was observed by TEM. The nanocomplexes exhibited a compact and spherical morphology with a narrow size distribution (Figure 1(d)). Meanwhile, the DLS results showed that the diameter of PEG-LP/siRNA NPs was about 120 nm (Figure 1(b)), which was consistent with that of TEM results. The siRNA encapsulation efficiency was about 70% at N/P ratio of 10 (data not shown). The excellent siRNA binding ability of PEG-LP/siRNA NPs might be due to the fact that the cationic amine groups of PEI assisted the hybrid NPs in retaining the siRNA [27].

3.2. In Vitro Cellular Uptake Efficiency and Intracellular Distribution

High siRNA uptake of NPs is a prerequisite for gene silencing. FAM-siRNA was used as a fluorescent probe to monitor the siRNA uptake efficiency of PEG-LP/siRNA in DU145 cells by flow cytometric analysis. As shown in Figure 2(a), for naked siRNA, only few FAM-labeled siRNA penetrated into the cells, and the cellular uptake efficiency was negligible. However, for PEG-LP/siRNA NPs, the cellular uptake efficiency was up to 94.4% which was slightly higher than the commercial transfection agent lipofectamine 2000 (88.0%).

Figure 2: In vitro cell uptake efficiency and intracellular distribution. (a) The uptake efficiency of fluorescence-labeled PEG-LP/siRNA in DU145 cells measured by flow cytometric analysis. (b) Intracellular distribution of fluorescence-labeled PEG-LP/siRNA NPs in DU145 cells at different time points. Green, fluorescence-siRNA; blue, DAPI stained nucleus.

Intracellular distribution of FAM-labeled siRNA in DU145 cells was evaluated by CLSM observation. As shown in Figure 2(b), it was clearly demonstrated that FAM-siRNA had been internalized and observed in the cytoplasma of DU145 cells 6 h after transfection. After incubation for 24 h, most of the green fluorescence FAM-siRNA was diffusely distributed in cytoplasm and even cell nucleus. Meanwhile, the fluorescence signal of FAM-siRNA was getting stronger. The results provided strong evidence showing that PEG-LP/siRNA NPs exhibited excellent cellular internalization.

3.3. In Vitro Cytotoxicity and Apoptosis Evaluation of PEG-LP/siRNA NPs

The cytotoxicities of the PEG-LP/siN.C. NPs at a series of siRNA concentrations (1 nM, 5 nM, 10 nM, 25 nM, and 50 nM) were tested by CCK-8 assay. As shown in Figure 3(a), nearly 100% of DU145 cells remained viable after 24 h incubation with PEG-LP/siN.C. NPs when the final concentration of siN.C. was 50 nM or less. The results suggested that the PEG-LP/siN.C. NPs possessed a lower cytotoxicity which was perfect for in vivo application. In contrast, the cell viabilities were decreased when DU145 cells were incubated with PEG-LP/siJnk-1 NPs at the concentration of 25 nM or greater. That is to say, the cytotoxicity effects of PEG-LP/siJnk-1 NPs mainly come from siRNA targeting Jnk-1.

Figure 3: In vitro cytotoxicity and apoptosis evaluation of PEG-LP/siRNA NPs. (a) Cytotoxicity of PEG-LP/siN.C. NPs or PEG-LP/siJnk-1 NPs at different siRNA concentrations after 48 h incubation. (b) The apoptosis of DU145 cells treated by PEG-LP/siN.C. NPs or PEG-LP/siJnk-1 NPs was detected using flow cytometric.

In order to find whether the cytotoxicity effects of PEG-LP/siJnk-1 NPs derived from the increase in cell apoptosis, the apoptosis of DU145 cells was detected using flow cytometric. As shown in Figure 3(b), PEG-LP/siJnk-1 NPs significantly increased the portion of apoptosis cells versus the PEG-LP/siN.C. NPs (15.4% versus 1.4%) after a 72 h treatment. The results showed that PEG-LP/siJnk-1 NPs could induce apoptosis of DU145 cells by Jnk-1 gene silencing.

3.4. Analysis of qRT-PCR and Western Blot for Gene Knockdown

The ideal siRNA delivery system should have the ability not only to deliver siRNA but also to significantly reduce the expression of its target genes. To assess the gene knockdown efficiency of PEG-LP/siJnk-1 NPs, the expression of Jnk-1 in DU145 cells treated with PEG-LP/siJnk-1 NPs was analyzed by qRT-PCR and western blot. As shown in Figure 4(a), decreased expression of Jnk-1 mRNA was observed in cells treated with Lipo2K/siJnk-1 and PEG-LP/siJnk-1 NPs compared with the control group (PBS). Notably, PEG-LP/siJnk-1 NPs lowered the Jnk-1 mRNA expression approximately up to 55% from its control group. Meanwhile, the results showed that naked siJnk-1, and PEG-LP/siN.C. NPs could not reduce the expression of Jnk-1 mRNA. Western blot analysis showed that treatment with PEG-LP/siJnk-1 NPs but not with PEG-LP/siN.C. led to markedly decreased Jnk-1 protein expression in DU145 cells and the knockdown efficiency was consistent with the mRNA expression data (Figure 4(b)).

Figure 4: In vitro gene silencing efficiency on DU145 cells. Relative Jnk-1 mRNA (a) and Jnk-1 protein (b) expression of DU145 cells treated with PBS, naked siJnk-1, PEG-LP/siN.C. NPs, Lipo2K/siJnk-1, or PEG-LP/siJnk-1 NPs, which were determined by qRT-PCR and western blot analysis.
3.5. The Apoptotic Mechanism of Jnk-1 Knockdown In Vitro

To further probe the mechanisms through which Jnk-1 knockdown may cause the apoptosis of DU145 cells, we focused on members of the cysteine aspartate-specific proteases (caspases) protein family which were important mediators of apoptosis signaling and played important roles during the apoptosis phases [28]. Several apoptosis-related proteins including caspases-3 and caspases-9 were studied. The western blotting results indicated that PEG-LP/siJnk-1 NPs could downregulate the expression of Bcl-2 and upregulate the expression of Bax, which successively led to the release of cytochrome C from the mitochondria and then the degradation of pro-caspase-9 and pro-caspase-3 and ultimately resulted in cell apoptosis (Figure 5). All the results suggested that siJnk-1 could induce apoptosis at least partly by the mitochondrial caspase-dependent pathway.

Figure 5: The apoptotic mechanisms of Jnk-1 knockdown in vitro. Western blot analysis of caspase activity and apoptotic related markers in DU145 cells treated with PBS, PEG-LP/siN.C. NPs, or PEG-LP/siJnk-1 NPs.
3.6. In Vivo Tumor Growth Suppression following Systemic Administration

To investigate the tumor therapeutic efficiency following systemic administration of PEG-LP/siJnk-1 NPs in vivo, we used a DU145 subcutaneous xenograft model to monitor tumor progression. Each mouse received various formulations at a dose of 600 ug siJnk-1 per kg mouse weight via the tail vein injection every other day. As shown in Figure 6(a), there was no significant difference on tumor growth among mice treated with PEG-LP/siN.C. NPs compared to PBS. In contrast, the PEG-LP/siJnk-1 NPs group showed significant inhibition on tumor growth. These results were further validated by TUNEL assay analysis in which apoptosis induced by PEG-LP/siJnk-1 NPs treatment was increased compared with PBS group and PEG-LP/siN.C. NPs group (Figure 6(b)). These results suggested that PEG-LP/siJnk-1 NPs could suppress tumor growth by inducing apoptosis in DU145 tumor cells.

Figure 6: Systemic delivery of PEG-LP/siJnk-1 NPs suppressed the growth of DU145 xenografts in nude mice. (a) Relative tumor volume of nude mice bearing DU145 tumors treated with PBS, PEG-LP NPs, PEG-LP/siN.C. NPs, or PEG-LP/siJnk-1 NPs. Data are presented as the means ± SD. (b) TUNEL assays of tumor tissues after treatment with the various formulations. (c) Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining of organs, including heart, liver, spleen, lung, and kidney from mice treated with the various formulations.

Finally, the potential toxicity of PEG-LP/siJnk-1 NPs in vivo was further investigated by HE staining. The results showed that no obvious histopathological abnormalities and tissue damage were noticed for mice of all experimental groups at the tested dose (Figure 6(c)).

4. Conclusions

We have developed a novel lipid-polymer hybrid NPs for the systemic delivery of siRNA, using a biocompatible and biodegradable PLGA polymer core containing PEI/siRNA, with the assistance of a cationic lipid DSPE-PEG. Such NPs exhibited high siRNA encapsulation efficiency. Meanwhile, the prepared PEG-LP/siRNA NPs could successfully enter cells, which in turn significantly downregulated the expression of its target genes in DU145 cells and induced apoptosis. Moreover, PEG-LP/siJnk-1 NPs could inhibit the tumor growth in a DU145 xenograft tumor model following systemic administration, suggesting its potential application for the delivery of siRNA.

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest to declare.


This work was financially supported by the Science and Technology Planning Project of Jilin Province (Grant no. 20160520166JH) and Health Technology Innovation Project of Jilin Province (Grant no. 2016J070).


  1. C. V. Pecot, G. A. Calin, R. L. Coleman, G. Lopez-Berestein, and A. K. Sood, “RNA interference in the clinic: challenges and future directions,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 59–67, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. K. A. Whitehead, R. Langer, and D. G. Anderson, “Knocking down barriers: advances in siRNA delivery,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 129–138, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. H. Takemoto, K. Miyata, S. Hattori et al., “Acidic pH-responsive siRNA conjugate for reversible carrier stability and accelerated endosomal escape with reduced IFNα-associated immune response,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 52, no. 24, pp. 6218–6221, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. C. Yang, L. Nilsson, M. U. Cheema et al., “Chitosan/siRNA nanoparticles targeting cyclooxygenase type 2 attenuate unilateral ureteral obstruction-induced kidney injury in mice,” Theranostics, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 110–123, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. B. J. Hong, A. J. Chipre, and S. T. Nguyen, “Acid-degradable polymer-caged lipoplex (PCL) platform for siRNA delivery: Facile cellular triggered release of siRNA,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 135, no. 47, pp. 17655–17658, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. Pichler, N. Zelcer, J. L. Prior, A. J. Kuil, and D. Piwnica-Worms, “In vivo RNA interference-mediated ablation of MDR1 P-glycoprotein,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 4487–4494, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. Everts, V. Saini, J. L. Leddon et al., “Covalently linked Au nanoparticles to a viral vector: Potential for combined photothermal and gene cancer therapy,” Nano Letters, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 587–591, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. T. Merdan, J. Kopeček, and T. Kissel, “Prospects for cationic polymers in gene and oligonucleotide therapy against cancer,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 715–758, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. F. H. E. Schagen, M. Ossevoort, R. E. M. Toes, and R. C. Hoeben, “Immune responses against adenoviral vectors and their transgene products: A review of strategies for evasion,” Critical Review in Oncology/Hematology, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 51–70, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. D. Omata, Y. Negishi, S. Hagiwara et al., “Enhanced gene delivery using Bubble liposomes and ultrasound for folate-PEG liposomes,” Journal of Drug Targeting, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 355–363, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. T. Ganbold, G. Gerile, H. Xiao, and H. Baigude, “Efficient in vivo siRNA delivery by stabilized d-peptide-based lipid nanoparticles,” RSC Advances, vol. 7, no. 15, pp. 8823–8831, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. W. Hou, S. Wen, R. Guo, S. Wang, and X. Shi, “Partially acetylated dendrimer-entrapped gold nanoparticles with reduced cytotoxicity for gene delivery applications,” Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 4094–4105, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. Qiu, L. Kong, X. Cao, A. Li, H. Tan, and X. Shi, “Dendrimer-entrapped gold nanoparticles modified with β-cyclodextrin for enhanced gene delivery applications,” RSC Advances, vol. 6, no. 31, pp. 25633–25640, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. Y. Shan, T. Luo, C. Peng et al., “Gene delivery using dendrimer-entrapped gold nanoparticles as nonviral vectors,” Biomaterials, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 3025–3035, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. T. Xiao, X. Cao, W. Hou, C. Peng, J. Qiu, and X. Shi, “Poly(amidoamine) dendrimers modified with 1,2-epoxyhexane or 1,2-epoxydodecane for enhanced gene delivery applications,” Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 10134–10140, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. X. Li, Y. Chen, M. Wang, Y. Ma, W. Xia, and H. Gu, “A mesoporous silica nanoparticle - PEI - Fusogenic peptide system for siRNA delivery in cancer therapy,” Biomaterials, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 1391–1401, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. Günther, J. Lipka, A. Malek, D. Gutsch, W. Kreyling, and A. Aigner, “Polyethylenimines for RNAi-mediated gene targeting in vivo and siRNA delivery to the lung,” European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 438–449, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. D. Fischer, Y. Li, B. Ahlemeyer, J. Krieglstein, and T. Kissel, “In vitro cytotoxicity testing of polycations: influence of polymer structure on cell viability and hemolysis,” Biomaterials, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 1121–1131, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. Y. He, G. Cheng, L. Xie, Y. Nie, B. He, and Z. Gu, “Polyethyleneimine/DNA polyplexes with reduction-sensitive hyaluronic acid derivatives shielding for targeted gene delivery,” Biomaterials, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 1235–1245, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. X. Zhou, X. Li, M. Gou et al., “Antitumoral efficacy by systemic delivery of heparin conjugated polyethylenimine-plasmid interleukin-15 complexes in murine models of lung metastasis,” Cancer Science, vol. 102, no. 7, pp. 1403–1409, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. C. Cai, Y. Xie, L. Wu et al., “PLGA-based dual targeted nanoparticles enhance miRNA transfection efficiency in hepatic carcinoma,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, Article ID 46250, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A. M. Aldayel, Y. W. Naguib, H. L. O'Mary et al., “Acid-Sensitive Sheddable PEGylated PLGA Nanoparticles Increase the Delivery of TNF-α siRNA in Chronic Inflammation Sites,” Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids, vol. 5, p. e340, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. C. R. Weston and R. J. Davis, “The JNK signal transduction pathway,” Current Opinion in Cell Biology, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 142–149, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. V. Sehgal and P. T. Ram, “Network Motifs in JNK Signaling,” Genes & Cancer, vol. 4, no. 9-10, pp. 409–413, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. K.-I. Matsuda, A. Sato, M. Okada et al., “Targeting JNK for therapeutic depletion of stem-like glioblastoma cells,” Scientific Reports, vol. 2, article no. 516, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. E. Parra and J. Ferreira, “Knockdown of the c-Jun-N-terminal kinase expression by siRNA inhibits MCF-7 breast carcinoma cell line growth,” Oncology Reports, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 1339–1345, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  27. F. Dai and W. Liu, “Enhanced gene transfection and serum stability of polyplexes by PDMAEMA-polysulfobetaine diblock copolymers,” Biomaterials, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 628–638, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. M. L. Würstle and M. Rehm, “A systems biology analysis of apoptosome formation and apoptosis execution supports allosteric procaspase-9 activation,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 289, no. 38, pp. 26277–26289, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus