Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Nanomaterials
Volume 2018 (2018), Article ID 5217095, 11 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5217095
Research Article

Embedding of Bacterial Cellulose Nanofibers within PHEMA Hydrogel Matrices: Tunable Stiffness Composites with Potential for Biomedical Applications

1Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry, Czech Academy of Sciences, Heyrovsky Sq. 2, 16206 Prague 6, Czech Republic
2Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering/Biopolymer Technology and Wallenberg Wood Science Center, Chalmers University of Technology, Kemivagen 10, 41296 Gothenburg, Sweden

Correspondence should be addressed to Radka Hobzova; zc.sac.cmi@avozboh

Received 20 July 2017; Revised 30 November 2017; Accepted 18 December 2017; Published 17 January 2018

Academic Editor: Faheem Ahmed

Copyright © 2018 Radka Hobzova et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. Klemm, F. Kramer, S. Moritz et al., “Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 50, no. 24, pp. 5438–5466, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. I. Siró and D. Plackett, “Microfibrillated cellulose and new nanocomposite materials: a review,” Cellulose, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 459–494, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. M. Rajwade, K. M. Paknikar, and J. V. Kumbhar, “Applications of bacterial cellulose and its composites in biomedicine,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 99, no. 6, pp. 2491–2511, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. Y. Dahman, “Nanostructured biomaterials and biocomposites from bacterial Cellulose nanofibers,” Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 5105–5122, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. N. Hoenich, “Cellulose for medical applications: past, present, and future,” BioResources, vol. 1, pp. 270–280, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  6. S. Thomas, “A review of the physical, biological and clinical properties of a bacterial cellulose wound,” Journal of Wound Care, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 349–352, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. L. Fu, J. Zhang, and G. Yang, “Present status and applications of bacterial cellulose-based materials for skin tissue repair,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 1432–1442, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. Svensson, E. Nicklasson, T. Harrah et al., “Bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for tissue engineering of cartilage,” Biomaterials, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 419–431, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. L. Nimeskern, H. Martínez Ávila, J. Sundberg, P. Gatenholm, R. Müller, and K. S. Stok, “Mechanical evaluation of bacterial nanocellulose as an implant material for ear cartilage replacement,” Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, vol. 22, pp. 12–21, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. C. Chang and L. Zhang, “Cellulose-based hydrogels: present status and application prospects,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 40–53, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. Nakayama, A. Kakugo, J. P. Gong et al., “High mechanical strength double-network hydrogel with bacterial cellulose,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 1124–1128, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. Yano, H. Maeda, M. Nakajima, T. Hagiwara, and T. Sawaguchi, “Preparation and mechanical properties of bacterial cellulose nanocomposites loaded with silica nanoparticles,” Cellulose, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 111–120, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. S. Yamanaka and J. Sugiyama, “Structural modification of bacterial cellulose,” Cellulose, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 213–225, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. T. Maneerung, S. Tokura, and R. Rujiravanit, “Impregnation of silver nanoparticles into bacterial cellulose for antimicrobial wound dressing,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 43–51, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. C. M. Fernandes, C. S. R. Freire, A. J. D. Silvestre, C. Pascoal Neto, and A. Gandini, “Novel materials based on chitosan and cellulose,” Polymer International, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 875–882, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. Gea, E. Bilotti, C. T. Reynolds, N. Soykeabkeaw, and T. Peijs, “Bacterial cellulose-poly(vinyl alcohol) nanocomposites prepared by an in-situ process,” Materials Letters, vol. 64, no. 8, pp. 901–904, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. L. E. Millon, C. J. Oates, and W. Wan, “Compression properties of polyvinyl alcohol-bacterial cellulose nanocomposite,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 922–929, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. E. Trovatti, L. Oliveira, C. S. R. Freire et al., “Novel bacterial cellulose-acrylic resin nanocomposites,” Composites Science and Technology, vol. 70, no. 7, pp. 1148–1153, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. F. Kramer, D. Klemm, D. Schumann et al., “Nanocellulose polymer composites as innovative pool for (Bio)material development,” Macromolecular Symposia, vol. 244, pp. 136–148, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. A. G. P. R. Figueiredo, A. R. P. Figueiredo, A. Alonso-Varona et al., “Biocompatible bacterial cellulose-poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) nanocomposite films,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2013, Article ID 698141, pp. 1–14, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. R. Hobzova, M. Duskova-Smrckova, J. Michalek, E. Karpushkin, and P. Gatenholm, “Methacrylate hydrogels reinforced with bacterial cellulose,” Polymer International, vol. 61, no. 7, pp. 1193–1201, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. W. Zhao, Z. Shi, X. Chen, G. Yang, C. Lenardi, and C. Liu, “Microstructural and mechanical characteristics of PHEMA-based nanofibre-reinforced hydrogel under compression,” Composites Part B: Engineering, vol. 76, pp. 292–299, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. A. R. P. Figueiredo, A. G. P. R. Figueiredo, N. H. C. S. Silva et al., “Antimicrobial bacterial cellulose nanocomposites prepared by in situ polymerization of 2-aminoethyl methacrylate,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 123, pp. 443–453, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. A. L. Buyanov, I. V. Gofman, L. G. Revel'skaya, A. K. Khripunov, and A. A. Tkachenko, “Anisotropic swelling and mechanical behavior of composite bacterial cellulose-poly(acrylamide or acrylamide-sodium acrylate) hydrogels,” Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 102–111, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. Y. Hagiwara, A. Putra, A. Kakugo, H. Furukawa, and J. P. Gong, “Ligament-like tough double-network hydrogel based on bacterial cellulose,” Cellulose, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 93–101, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. M. Pandey, N. Mohamad, and M. C. I. M. Amin, “Bacterial cellulose/acrylamide pH-sensitive smart hydrogel: Development, characterization, and toxicity studies in ICR mice model,” Molecular Pharmaceutics, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 3596–3608, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. L. Tanaka, N. Vest, C. M. Ferguson, and P. Gatenholm, “Comparison of biomechanical properties of native menisci and bacterial cellulose implant,” International Journal of Polymeric Materials and Polymeric Biomaterials, vol. 63, no. 17, pp. 891–897, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. H. Martínez Ávila, S. Schwarz, E.-M. Feldmann et al., “Biocompatibility evaluation of densified bacterial nanocellulose hydrogel as an implant material for auricular cartilage regeneration,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 98, no. 17, pp. 7423–7435, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. J. Michalek, M. Pradny, and K. Dusek, “Hydrogels in biology and medicine,” Bioceramics Development and Applications, pp. 177–230, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  30. J. Labsky, J. Vacik, and P. Hosek, Preparations for Prevention And Healing of Inflammation Affections, US6610284-B1, 2003.
  31. A. Bodin, H. Bäckdahl, H. Fink, L. Gustafsson, B. Risberg, and P. Gatenholm, “Influence of cultivation conditions on mechanical and morphological properties of bacterial cellulose tubes,” Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 425–434, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. I. Breßler, J. Kohlbrecher, and A. F. Thünemann, “SASfit: A tool for small-angle scattering data analysis using a library of analytical expressions,” Journal of Applied Crystallography, vol. 48, pp. 1587–1598, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. C. Azuma, K. Yasuda, Y. Tanabe et al., “Biodegradation of high-toughness double network hydrogels as potential materials for artificial cartilage,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, vol. 81A, no. 2, pp. 373–380, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. L. Ambrosio, R. De Santis, S. Iannace, P. A. Netti, and L. Nicolais, “Viscoelastic behavior of composite ligament prostheses,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 6–12, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. P. Netti, A. D'Amore, D. Ronca, L. Ambrosio, and L. Nicolais, “Structure-mechanical properties relationship of natural tendons and ligaments,” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 525–530, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus