Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Nanomaterials
Volume 2019, Article ID 3928526, 9 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3928526
Research Article

Facile Synthesis of Yb3+- and Er3+-Codoped LiGdF4 Colloidal Nanocrystals with High-Quality Upconversion Luminescence

1College of Chemistry and Environment Science, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot 010022, China
2Physics and Chemistry of Functional Materials, Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory, Hohhot 010022, China
3State Key Laboratory on Integrated Optoelectronics, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Gejihu De; nc.ude.unmi@hjged

Received 29 December 2018; Revised 14 March 2019; Accepted 14 April 2019; Published 16 May 2019

Academic Editor: Hiromasa Nishikiori

Copyright © 2019 Lu Zi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Herein, we synthesized high-quality colloidal nanocrystals of Yb3+/Er3+-codoped LiGdF4 with intense green emission by using a facile route and turning the associated reaction parameters. Moreover, we probed the effects of reaction conditions on nanocrystal properties (crystal structure, morphology, and luminescence) and gained valuable mechanistic insights into nucleation and growth processes. Sample purity was found to depend on LiOH·H2O concentration, reaction temperature, and time, which allowed us to manipulate sample purity and thus obtain species ranging from mixtures of LiGdF4:Yb3+/Er3+ with GdF3 to pure tetragonal-phase LiGdF4:Yb3+/Er3+. Investigation of upconversion luminescence properties and the luminescence lifetime of as-prepared samples revealed that LiGdF4 is a promising host material for realizing the desired upconversion luminescence.

1. Introduction

Trivalent lanthanide ion- (Ln3+-) doped nanocrystals, which can convert infrared radiation to visible luminescence, have attracted much attention in view of their excellent luminescence properties and unique application value [19]. The application fields are very wide including solid-state lasers, 3D displays, solar cells, photovoltaics, biological probe and label markers, and multimodal bioimaging [1016]. Most of these nanocrystals correspond to fluorides, which exhibit several advantages over other halides, such as thermal and environmental stability, high refractive index, high transparency, low-frequency phonons, and lower emission threshold [1720]. Among fluorides, those based on Gd3+ have been intensively researched because of their excellent chemical and optical properties [2124]. Moreover, the energy gap between the 6P7/2 and the 8S7/2 levels of Gd3+ equals 32000 cm−1, which allows Gd3+ to be used as an intermediary to promote fluoride energy transfer and thus greatly improve the efficiency of upconversion luminescence [25, 26].

Much research has been performed on the monodisperse, well-shaped, uniform-size, and phase-pure NaGdF4 nanoparticles in recent decades [2735]. For instance, Liu and coworkers prepared size-controllable, highly monodisperse, oleate-capped NaGdF4:Yb,Er nanocrystals that can be used as biological probes for in vivo testing of tiny tumors [36], while Johnson’s group showed that the regulation of reaction time and temperature allows the synthesis of size-tunable and ultrasmall NaGdF4 nanoparticles (2.5-8.0 nm) [37]. There is no doubt that NaGdF4 is considered to be an ideal rigid host matrix for upconversion, and its synthesis has therefore become a research hotspot for the majority of scholars. However, LiGdF4 has been underexplored among the AGdF4 () hosts because of the difficulty of synthesizing pure tetragonal-phase LiGdF4 nanocrystals. To the best of our knowledge, LiGdF4 nanocrystals are mainly prepared using Czochralski, sol-gel, or thermal decomposition methods. For instance, Cornacchia and coworkers prepared LiGdF4:Tm3+ single crystals utilizing the Czochralski technique [38], while Lepoutre and coworkers prepared 90SiO210LiGd1-xEuxF4 ( or 0.05) composites using a sol-gel method [39]. Moreover, Xiong’s group successfully synthesized LiGdF4 nanoparticles with different Ca2+ contents using a thermal decomposition method, revealing that Ca2+ ions are vital to the successful synthesis of these nanoparticles [40]. Na and coworkers prepared pure tetragonal-phase LiGdF4 upconversion nanophosphors doped with Y3+ by thermal decomposition in a methanol-LiOH·H2O-NH4F mixture and showed that the orthorhombic GdF3 phase was produced at Y3+ doping degrees of 0-20 mol% [41]. Initially, we tried to prepare LiGdF4:Yb,Er nanocrystals by similar methods of LiYF4:Yb,Er nanocrystals used, while we did not get the result we wanted. After careful analysis, we speculate that it may be caused by various facts, such as chemical factor itself, equipment factor, and experimental environmental factor. Furthermore, we noted that the vast majority of LiGdF4:Yb,Er nanocrystal syntheses employ solutions of oleic acid and 1-octadecenein methanol, which are highly toxic.

To address this challenge, we have developed a suitable synthetic route to prepare high-quality LiGdF4:Yb/Er nanocrystals avoiding extra ion doping and the use of methanol-LiOH·H2O-NH4F mixtures. An improved thermal decomposition method is introduced in this paper. Moreover, we determined optimal reaction conditions and investigated the influence of reaction temperature, reaction time, and LiOH·H2O content on the upconversion luminescence properties and luminescence lifetimes.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

The synthesis was carried out using standard oxygen-free procedures and commercially available reagents. RE2O3 (, Yb3+ 99.99%, and Er3+ 99.99%), CF3COOH (analytical grade 99.0%), oleic acid (OA, analytical grade), and LiOH·H2O (>95.0%) were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Beijing Co. Ltd. Absolute ethanol (), cyclohexane (analytical grade 99.5%), and 1-octadecene (ODE, technical grade 90%) were purchased from Tianjin Chemical Co., Kemeng, and Sigma-Aldrich, respectively. All chemicals were used without further purification.

2.2. Synthesis of Precursor Mixture

We improved and modified previously reported methods to synthesize trifluoroacetate precursors [4244]. Compared with the traditional preparation process of single trifluoroacetates of the lanthanides [Ln(CF3COO)3, , Yb, and Er] and Li(CF3COO)3 samples, we are mixing the two to prepare precursor mixture. As for reaction vessel, we choose a 100 mL Teflon-lined autoclave to replace the traditional 100 mL three-neck flask. The process was carried out via adding Gd2O3 (0.78 mmol), Yb2O3 (0.2 mmol), Er2O3 (0.02 mmol), and a certain amount of LiOH·H2O to the mixture solution of trifluoroacetic acid/water (6 mL : 6 mL). This turbid solution was vigorously stirred and transferred to a 100 mL Teflon-lined autoclave. Subsequently, the emulsion was heated and maintained at 80°C. After confinement for 12 h, the solution was cooled to room temperature and transferred to a 100 mL three-neck flask and dryly heated up at 60°C for evaporating excess CF3COOH/H2O. Then, the precursor mixture was obtained. The profit about such doing is that the preparation process will be safer and more convenient. It is mainly because a mixed solution of methanol, LiOH·H2O, and NH4F for providing Li+ or other doped ions is required in the traditional preparation process, while none of these is required in our preparation.

2.3. Synthesis of High-Quality Yb3+/Er3+-Codoped LiGdF4 Colloidal Nanocrystals

The high-quality Yb3+/Er3+-codoped LiGdF4 colloidal nanocrystals were prepared by a thermal decomposition route. The process was carried out via adding 15 mL OA and 15 mL ODE to precursor mixture. The cloudy solution was vigorously stirred to yield a transparent solution. Subsequently, the transparent solution was heated to 110°C under vacuum condition for removing needless water/oxygen. An hour later, the solution was heated to 310°C (or 280°C, 290°C, and 300°C) under an argon gas atmosphere and maintained for a period of time (1 h, 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, 5 h, or 6 h). The reaction system was cooled to room temperature and added excess absolute ethanol to precipitate products. The as-synthesized products were washed several times with cyclohexane/ethanol (1 : 4) mixed solution to remove the residue of organic ligands and other mixtures on the products and isolated by centrifugation at 8000 rpm for 3 min. Finally, the products were dried under vacuum to 60°C for 12 h to obtain a white powder sample for reserving.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Synthetic Procedure and Reaction Mechanism

Figure 1 illustrates the synthesis of high-quality Yb3+/Er3+-codoped LiGdF4 colloidal nanocrystals, showing that it comprised two steps, namely, hydrothermal preparation of the precursor mixture, followed by thermal decomposition to afford LiGdF4 colloidal nanocrystals.

Figure 1: Synthesis of LiGdF4:Yb3+/Er3+ colloidal nanocrystals.

To get better understanding, the nucleation and growth mechanisms of LiGdF4:Yb0.2/Er0.02 colloidal nanocrystals are speculated in Scheme 1. Briefly, the process starts with the cothermolysis of Gd(CF3COO)3 and CF3COOLi in oleic acid and 1-octadecene systems. When the reaction system is heated to 100~120°C, trifluoroacetate ligands are partially exchanged for oleic acid residues, and the C-F bond of the former is broken to release F- when the reaction temperature further increases to 250~330°C. Subsequently, fluoride anions engage in fluorination and cleave Gd-OOCCF3 bonds to promote nucleation, and the thus obtained crystal nuclei agglomerate to form larger particles as the reaction progresses. With the increase of temperature, the growth rate of these nuclei crystal nucleus increases and eventually forms nanocrystals [4548].

Scheme 1: Schematic of the reaction mechanism.
3.2. Structure and Morphology

Sample crystal structures were characterized by using a Rigaku Ultima IV X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation () at 200 mA and 40 kV. XRD patterns were recorded for dried powders in the range of at a step size of 8°/min. Figure 2 clearly demonstrates the growth kinetics of LiGdF4:Yb3+/Er3+ nanocrystals synthesized at different reaction times. It is not hard to find that the diffraction peaks of samples obtained at and , 2 h, and 3 h corresponded to a mixture of LiGdF4 (JCPDS No. 27-1236) and GdF3 (JCPDS No. 49-1804), whereas those obtained at and and 5 h contain LiGdF4 (JCPDS No. 27-1236). Hence, 4 or 5 h was concluded to be the optimal reaction times for synthesizing LiGdF4:Yb3+/Er3+ nanocrystals.

Figure 2: XRD patterns of LiGdF4:Yb3+/Er3+ colloidal nanocrystals, which are synthesized at and , 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, and 5 h.

Next, we studied the optimum reaction temperature for preparing LiGdF4:Yb3+/Er3+ colloidal nanocrystals. Figure 3 clearly demonstrates the formation of LiGdF4 with GdF3 at and temperatures () of 280, 290, and 300°C, revealing that LiGdF4 nuclei were instantly formed even at 280°C and that the growth rate of these nuclei increased with the increasing temperature. A balance between nucleation and growth was established at 310°C, which was concluded to be the optimum reaction temperature for the synthesized tetragonal LiGdF4:Yb3+/Er3+ nanocrystals. Finally, the optimum Li/RE ratio was determined as three, although the optimization of Li+ concentration proved to be very tortuous. Details of the synthetic process and parameters of tetragonal-phase LiGdF4:Yb3+/Er3+ colloidal nanocrystals are given in the supporting information (Figure S1, S2, and Table S1). Thus, the above experimental results suggest that the optimum conditions for tetragonal LiGdF4:Yb3+/Er3+ nanocrystal synthesis were determined as , , and (Table S1).

Figure 3: XRD patterns of LiGdF4:Yb3+/Er3+ colloidal nanocrystals, which are synthesized at and , 290°C, 300°C, and 310°C.

Sample morphology was assessed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) with a FEI Tecnai G2 F20 S-Twin transmission electron microscope operating at 200 kV. Samples for TEM imaging were prepared by drying nanocrystal dispersions in cyclohexane on amorphous carbon-coated Cu grids. Representative TEM micrographs of as-synthesized LiGdF4 nanocrystals (relatively pure tetragonal phase) are displayed in Figure 4. Figures 4(a)4(d) show low-magnification TEM images, while Figures 5(a) and 5(b) show high-magnification TEM images with related selected-area electron diffraction patterns, revealing that the as-synthesized LiGdF4:Yb3+/Er3+ nanocrystals can withstand irradiation with high-energy electrons. From the TEM images, we can also see that most of the samples are octahedron and sphere. And the average sizes of these crystals focus on 137.7 nm nearby in Figure 4(e), while the octahedral crystals focus on on average. HRTEM imaging revealed the presence of obvious lattice fringes, indicating the high crystallinity of individual particles. The adjacent lattice spacing calculated by FFT analysis (~0.47 nm) was assigned to the (101) crystal plane of tetragonal-phase LiGdF4, which confirmed that as-synthesized LiGdF4 nanocrystals exhibited high crystallinity and few defects.

Figure 4: (a–d) TEM images of LiGdF4:Yb3+/Er3+ nanocrystals, which are synthesized at , , and . (e) Grain size distribution histograms of Figure 4(a).
Figure 5: HRTEM images of LiGdF4:Yb3+/Er3+ nanocrystals, which are synthesized at , , and . The insets of (a) and (b) correspond with Fourier transform electron diffraction pattern.
3.3. Upconversion Luminescence

Upconversion emission spectra were recorded on a Hitachi F-4600 fluorescence spectrophotometer (, , and ) under excitation with an adjustable 980 nm NIR laser diode. Room temperature upconversion emission spectra are obtained by drying the nanocrystal dispersion in cyclohexane at a concentration of 2 mg/mL. It is formed into a colloidal solution by dispersing dried powder in cyclohexane for several hours’ ultrasound.

It is well known that Yb3+- and Er3+-codoped rare earth fluorides can exhibit strong upconversion luminescence upon 980 nm near-infrared excitation, as observed herein for the colloidal suspension of LiGdF4:Yb3+/Er3+. Two visible-light-region emission bands, positioned at 523 and 543 nm (green upconversion luminescence) and 672 nm (red upconversion luminescence), were observed for all samples in Figures 6(a) and 6(b). The above bands were ascribed to 2H11/2 → 4I15/2, 4S3/2 → 4I15/2, and 4F9/2 → 4I15/2 transitions, respectively. Meanwhile, we also find that the intensity of upconversion luminescence increased with increasing reaction time, which was mainly attributed to the concomitant increase of tetragonal phase content. This phase could be obtained in relatively pure form at , , and , while mixtures of LiGdF4 with GdF3, exhibiting lower upconversion luminescence intensities because of the presence of the latter component and other impurities, were obtained otherwise. It is surprising that there is a sudden drop in the upconversion luminescence intensity of the sample, which is synthesized at , , and . This finding might be attributed to the fact that the content of GdF3 and other impurities in the above sample exceeded that in the optimal condition sample.

Figure 6: (a) Room temperature upconversion emission spectra of LiGdF4:Yb3+/Er3+ nanocrystals, which are synthesized at and , 2 h, 3 h, 4 h, and 5 h. (b) Room temperature upconversion emission spectra of LiGdF4:Yb3+/Er3+ nanocrystals, which are synthesized at , , and . (c) Log-log plot of power dependence of the upconversion emissions intensity for LiGdF4:Yb3+/Er3+ nanocrystals at , , and .

In addition, it might be that the growth rate of LiGdF4 crystal nucleus reached the maximum at 4 h, while the reaction time that further increased to 5 h might lead to excessive surfactant and activator ions accumulate on the crystal surface. All of these cause fluorescence quenching of the sample, which is synthesized at , , and . The clear contrast figures of emission intensity and reaction time are provided in the supporting information (Figure S3 and Table S2). To gain further insights into the upconversion emission process, we investigated the dependence of upconversion emission intensity on excitation power adopting the relation for data analysis in Figure 6(c). We regard the tetragonal LiGdF4 nanocrystals as example to illuminate the upconversion emission process. The slopes of Gaussian function-based log-log fits were determined as 2.11 and 1.95 for the dominant green emissions at 523 and 543 nm, respectively, which illustrated that these emissions involve a two-photon process. For red emission, the corresponding slope was obtained as 2.37, and the same conclusion was drawn. It corresponds with the analysis of upconversion emissions mechanism.

Figure 7 schematically illustrates energy transfer and upconversion emission processes occurring at an excitation wavelength of 980 nm and a pump power density of 55 mW/cm2. Under continuous excitation at 980 nm photon, sensitizer Yb3+ ions can be excited from the 2F7/2 ground state to the 2F5/2 state. Subsequently, the latter states decay back to the former, and the released energy is captured by nearby Er3+ ions, which are excited from the 4I15/2 ground state into the 4I11/2 state. Further energy capture by Er3+ ions in the 4I11/2 excited state results in the population of a higher-lying 4F7/2 state that can relax to the 2H11/2 and 4S3/2 levels (nonradiatively) and to the 4I15/2 level (radiatively) with dominant 2H11/2 → 4I15/2 and 4S3/2 → 4I15/2 transitions resulting in green emission. Alternatively, Er3+ ions in the 4I11/2 excited state can nonradiatively relax to the 4I13/2 state and capture further energy to populate a higher-lying 4F9/2 state that subsequently radiatively relaxes to the 4I15/2 level with dominant 4F9/2 → 4I15/2 transitions resulting in red emissions. Notably, as-synthesized LiGdF4 nanocrystals not only showed higher upconversion emission intensity but also longer luminescence lifetime (Figure 8 and Figure S4).

Figure 7: Energy level diagrams of upconversion emissions from Yb3+ to Er3+ in LiGdF4:Yb3+/Er3+ nanocrystals under 980 nm pump power excitation.
Figure 8: UCL decays from 2H11/2 of Er3+ by monitoring the Er3+ emission at 523 nm under 980 nm excitation in LiGdF4:Yb3+/Er3+ nanocrystals, which are synthesized at , , and , 3 h, 4 h, and 5 h.

The decay of upconversion luminescence was recorded at room temperature using a lifetime fluorescence spectrometer (Delta Flex TCSPC system, Horiba Scientific, Scotland) equipped with an adjustable pulse laser as excitation source (, , , and ). The obtained decay curves were fitted by a single-exponential function, and the effective UCL lifetime of nonexponential decay was calculated as where is the maximum upconversion luminescence intensity and is the upconversion luminescence intensity as a function of time [49, 50]. The UCL lifetimes of the 2H11/2 state, determined by monitoring Er3+ emission at 523 nm under 980 nm, were found to increase with a reaction time of up to 4 h, equalling 369.30 (2 h), 663.23 (3 h), 745.74 μs (4 h), and 540.45 μs (5 h), respectively (Figure 8). This result confirmed that the sample synthesized at , , and exhibited good photostability because of the relatively pure tetragonal phase. In other samples, the presence of impurity ingredients led to the rapid migration of energy to lattice defects or surface quenchers, inducing luminescence quenching. This behaviour was consistent with the trend of upconversion emission intensity in Figure 6(a). Finally, we measured the lifetimes of 2H11/2, 4S3/2, and 4F9/2 states of Er3+ under 980 nm excitation in LiGdF4:Yb3+/Er3+ nanocrystals, synthesized at , , and (Figure S4), revealing increases from 663.23 μs (523 nm) and 665.54 μs (543 nm) to 678.41 μs (672 nm), respectively.

4. Conclusion

We have successfully improved and modified previously reported methods to synthesize high-quality Yb3+/Er3+-codoped LiGdF4 colloidal nanocrystals with intense green emission. Specifically, the above synthesis involved the hydrothermal preparation of trifluoroacetate precursors Gd(CF3COO)3 and CF3COOLi that were subsequently thermolyzed to afford the desired nanocrystals. Importantly, the adopted approach obviated the need for additional ion doping and the use of toxic methanol-LiOH·H2O-NH4F mixture. Studies on the impact of LiOH·H2O concentration, reaction temperature, and time on the upconversion luminescence of nanocrystal samples showed that relatively phase-pure tetragonal LiGdF4 nanocrystals could be obtained under optimal conditions (, , and ). Moreover, as-synthesized LiGdF4:Yb3+/Er3+ nanocrystals not only showed a stronger upconversion emission intensity but also featured a longer luminescence lifetime. This work paves the way to the broad utilization of LiGdF4, which is viewed as an ideal alternative matrix material, since the ionic radius of Li+ is much smaller than that of Na+. Herein, this research work will be indispensable for further follow-up study.

Data Availability

All data are obtained through our own experiments. The public database is not used in this article. If the reader needs the data in this article, he can contact the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge professor Gejihu De for guiding and the testing Center of Inner Mongolia University. This work is supported by the Postgraduate Scientific Research Innovation Foundation of Inner Mongolia University (Grant No. CXJJS15082), Open Fund of the State Key Laboratory on Integrated Optoelectronics (Grant No. IOSKL2013KF08), National Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21261016), and Talents Project Inner Mongolia of China (Grant No. CYYC5026).

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material including X-ray diffraction patterns of as-prepared samples, decay curves of LiGdF4:Yb3+/Er3+ nanocrystals, and discussion of influencing factors (such as temperature, time, and emission intensity). (Supplementary Materials)

References

  1. Z. L. Wang, H. L. W. Chan, H. L. Li, and J. H. Hao, “Highly efficient low-voltage cathodoluminescence of LaF3:Ln3+ (Ln=Eu3+,Ce3+,Tb3+) spherical particles,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 93, no. 14, article 141106, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. F. Zhang and D. Zhao, “Fabrication of ordered magnetite-doped rare earth fluoride nanotube arrays by nanocrystal self-assembly,” Nano Research, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 292–305, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. Fan, S. Wang, W. Xu, M. Li, H. Sun, and L. Hu, “Enormously enhanced upconversion emission in β-NaYF4:20Yb,2Er microcrystals via Na+ ion exchange,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 869–877, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. F. Vetrone, R. Naccache, A. Zamarrón et al., “Temperature sensing using fluorescent nanothermometers,” ACS Nano, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 3254–3258, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. V. Mahalingam, F. Mangiarini, F. Vetrone et al., “Bright white upconversion emission from Tm3+/Yb3+/Er3+-doped Lu3Ga5O12 nanocrystals,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 112, no. 46, pp. 17745–17749, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. X. Zou, M. Xu, W. Yuan et al., “A water-dispersible dye-sensitized upconversion nanocomposite modified with phosphatidylcholine for lymphatic imaging,” Chemical Communications, vol. 52, no. 91, pp. 13389–13392, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. W. Yang, X. Li, D. Chi, H. Zhang, and X. Liu, “Lanthanide-doped upconversion materials: emerging applications for photovoltaics and photocatalysis,” Nanotechnology, vol. 25, no. 48, article 482001, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. C. Zhang, H. P. Zhou, L. Y. Liao et al., “Luminescence modulation of ordered upconversion nanopatterns by a photochromic diarylethene: rewritable optical storage with nondestructive readout,” Advanced Materials, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 633–637, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. T. Zako, H. Nagata, N. Terada, M. Sakono, K. Soga, and M. Maeda, “Improvement of dispersion stability and characterization of upconversion nanophosphors covalently modified with PEG as a fluorescence bioimaging probe,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 43, no. 15, pp. 5325–5330, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. F. Wang and X. Liu, “Recent advances in the chemistry of lanthanide-doped upconversion nanocrystals,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 976–989, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. H. Guo, Z. Li, H. Qian, Y. Hu, and I. N. Muhammad, “Seed-mediated synthesis of NaY F4:Y b, Er/NaGdF4 nanocrystals with improved upconversion fluorescence and MR relaxivity,” Nanotechnology, vol. 21, no. 12, article 125602, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. V. Eliseeva and J. C. G. Bünzli, “Lanthanide luminescence for functional materials and bio-sciences,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 189–227, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. B. M. Tissue, “Synthesis and luminescence of lanthanide ions in nanoscale insulating hosts,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 2837–2845, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. Kim, Y. Piao, and T. Hyeon, “Multifunctional nanostructured materials for multimodal imaging, and simultaneous imaging and therapy,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 372–390, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. X. Liu, X. Kong, Y. Zhang et al., “Breakthrough in concentration quenching threshold of upconversion luminescence via spatial separation of the emitter doping area for bio-applications,” Chemical Communications, vol. 47, no. 43, pp. 11957–11959, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. Y. Liu, Y. Chen, Y. Lin, Q. Tan, Z. Luo, and Y. Huang, “Energy transfer in Yb3+–Er3+-codoped bismuth borate glasses,” Journal of the Optical Society of America B, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 1046–1052, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. F. Wang, J. Wang, J. Xu, X. Xue, H. Chen, and X. Liu, “Tunable upconversion emissions from lanthanide-doped monodisperse β-NaYF4 nanoparticles,” Spectroscopy Letters, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 400–405, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. E. van der Kolk, P. Dorenbos, K. Krämer, D. Biner, and H. U. Güdel, “High-resolution luminescence spectroscopy study of down-conversion routes inNaGdF4:Nd3+ and NaGdF4:Tm3+ using synchrotron radiation,” Physical Review B, vol. 77, no. 12, article 125110, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. C. Li and J. Lin, “Rare earth fluoride nano-/microcrystals: synthesis, surface modification and application,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 20, no. 33, pp. 6831–6847, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. P. R. Diamente, M. Raudsepp, and F. C. J. M. van Veggel, “Dispersible Tm3+-doped nanoparticles that exhibit strong 1.47 μm photoluminescence,” Advanced Functional Materials, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 363–368, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. R. T. Wegh, H. Donker, K. D. Oskam, and A. Meijerink, “Visible quantum cutting in LiGdF4:Eu3+ through downconversion,” Science, vol. 283, no. 5402, pp. 663–666, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. F. You, S. Huang, S. Liu, and Y. Tao, “VUV excited luminescence of MGdF4:Eu3+ (M=Na, K, NH4),” Journal of Luminescence, vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 95–99, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. R. Naccache, F. Vetrone, V. Mahalingam, L. A. Cuccia, and J. A. Capobianco, “Controlled synthesis and water dispersibility of hexagonal phase NaGdF4:Ho3+/Yb3+ nanoparticles,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 717–723, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. T. Li, S. Liu, H. Zhang, E. Wang, L. Song, and P. Wang, “Ultraviolet upconversion luminescence in Y2O3:Yb3+,Tm3+ nanocrystals and its application in photocatalysis,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 2882–2886, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. Y. Wu, C. Li, D. Yang, and J. Lin, “Rare earth β-NaGdF4 fluorides with multiform morphologies: hydrothermal synthesis and luminescent properties,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 354, no. 2, pp. 429–436, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. H. Dong, L. D. Sun, and C. H. Yan, “Energy transfer in lanthanide upconversion studies for extended optical applications,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 1608–1634, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. C. De Nadaï, A. Demourgues, L. Lozano, P. Gravereau, and J. Grannec, “Structural investigations of new copper fluorides NaRECu2F8 (RE3+=Sm3+, Eu3+, Gd3+, Y3+, Er3+, Yb3+),” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 2487–2491, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. H. X. Mai, Y. W. Zhang, R. Si et al., “High-quality sodium rare-earth fluoride nanocrystals: controlled synthesis and optical properties,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 128, no. 19, pp. 6426–6436, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. J. Y. Park, M. J. Baek, E. S. Choi et al., “Paramagnetic ultrasmall gadolinium oxide nanoparticles as advanced T1 MRI contrast agent: account for large longitudinal relaxivity, optimal particle diameter, and in vivo T1 MR images,” ACS Nano, vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 3663–3669, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. R. Naccache, P. Chevallier, J. Lagueux et al., “High relaxivities and strong vascular signal enhancement for NaGdF4 nanoparticles designed for dual MR/optical imaging,” Advanced Healthcare Materials, vol. 2, no. 11, pp. 1478–1488, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. R. Lv, S. Gai, Y. Dai, N. Niu, F. He, and P. Yang, “Highly uniform hollow GdF3 spheres: controllable synthesis, tuned luminescence, and drug-release properties,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 5, no. 21, pp. 10806–10818, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. H. Chen, X. Li, F. Liu, H. Zhang, and Z. Wang, “Renal clearable peptide functionalized NaGdF4 nanodots for high-efficiency tracking orthotopic colorectal tumor in mouse,” Molecular Pharmaceutics, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 3134–3141, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. M. Ahrén, L. Selegård, A. Klasson et al., “Synthesis and characterization of PEGylated Gd2O3 nanoparticles for MRI contrast enhancement,” Langmuir, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 5753–5762, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. S. Dühnen, T. Rinkel, and M. Haase, “Size control of nearly monodisperse β-NaGdF4 particles prepared from small α-NaGdF4 nanocrystals,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 4033–4039, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. J. L. Bridot, A. C. Faure, S. Laurent et al., “Hybrid gadolinium oxide nanoparticles: multimodal contrast agents for in vivo imaging,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 129, no. 16, pp. 5076–5084, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. C. Liu, Z. Gao, J. Zeng et al., “Magnetic/upconversion fluorescent NaGdF4:Yb,Er nanoparticle-based dual-modal molecular probes for imaging tiny tumors in vivo,” ACS Nano, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 7227–7240, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. N. J. J. Johnson, W. Oakden, G. J. Stanisz, R. Scott Prosser, and F. C. J. M. van Veggel, “Size-tunable, ultrasmall NaGdF4 nanoparticles: insights into their T1 MRI contrast enhancement,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 23, no. 16, pp. 3714–3722, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. F. Cornacchia, A. Di Lieto, and M. Tonelli, “LiGdF4:Tm3+: spectroscopy and diode-pumped laser experiments,” Applied Physics B, vol. 96, no. 2-3, pp. 363–368, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. S. Lepoutre, D. Boyer, S. Fujihara, and R. Mahiou, “Structural and optical characterizations of sol–gel based composites constituted of LiGdF4:Eu3+ nanocrystallites dispersed into a silica matrix,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 19, no. 18, pp. 2784–2788, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. Z. Xiong, Y. Yang, and Y. Wang, “Enhanced upconversion luminescence and tuned red-to-green emission ratio of LiGdF4 nanocrystals via Ca2+ doping,” RSC Advances, vol. 6, no. 79, pp. 75664–75668, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. H. Na, J. S. Jeong, H. J. Chang et al., “Facile synthesis of intense green light emitting LiGdF4:Yb,Er-based upconversion bipyramidal nanocrystals and their polymer composites,” Nanoscale, vol. 6, no. 13, pp. 7461–7468, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. G. S. Yi, W. B. Lee, and G. M. Chow, “Synthesis of LiYF4, BaYF5, and NaLaF4 optical nanocrystals,” Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 2790–2794, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. H. T. Wong, F. Vetrone, R. Naccache, H. L. W. Chan, J. Hao, and J. A. Capobianco, “Water dispersible ultra-small multifunctional KGdF4:Tm3+, Yb3+ nanoparticles with near-infrared to near-infrared upconversion,” Journal of Materials Science, vol. 21, no. 41, pp. 16589–16596, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. Q. Cheng, J. Sui, and W. Cai, “Enhanced upconversion emission in Yb3+ and Er3+ codoped NaGdF4 nanocrystals by introducing Li+ ions,” Nanoscale, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 779–784, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. M. Li, H. Schnablegger, and S. Mann, “Coupled synthesis and self-assembly of nanoparticles to give structures with controlled organization,” Nature, vol. 402, no. 6760, pp. 393–395, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. J. Shin, J. H. Kyhm, A. R. Hong et al., “Multicolor tunable upconversion luminescence from sensitized seed-mediated grown LiGdF4:Yb,Tm-based core/triple-shell nanophosphors for transparent displays,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 30, no. 23, pp. 8457–8464, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. Y.-P. Du, Y.-W. Zhang, L.-D. Sun, and C.-H. Yan, “Optically active uniform potassium and lithium rare earth fluoride nanocrystals derived from metal trifluroacetate precursors,” Dalton Transactions, no. 40, pp. 8574–8581, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. M. R. Jones, K. D. Osberg, R. J. Macfarlane, M. R. Langille, and C. A. Mirkin, “Templated techniques for the synthesis and assembly of plasmonic nanostructures,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 111, no. 6, pp. 3736–3827, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. J. Xie, X. Xie, C. Mi et al., “Controlled synthesis, evolution mechanisms, and luminescent properties of ScFx:Ln (x = 2.76, 3) nanocrystals,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 29, no. 22, pp. 9758–9766, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. H. Dong, L. D. Sun, W. Feng, Y. Gu, F. Li, and C. H. Yan, “Versatile spectral and lifetime multiplexing nanoplatform with excitation orthogonalized upconversion luminescence,” ACS Nano, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 3289–3297, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus