Journal of Nanomaterials

Journal of Nanomaterials / 2020 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 6908290 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6908290

Mariana G. Muñoz-Carrillo, Cristina Garcidueñas-Piña, Roberto C. Valerio-García, José L. Carrazco-Rosales, José F. Morales-Domínguez, "Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles from the Opuntia ficus-indica Fruit and Its Activity against Treated Wastewater Microorganisms", Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2020, Article ID 6908290, 10 pages, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6908290

Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles from the Opuntia ficus-indica Fruit and Its Activity against Treated Wastewater Microorganisms

Academic Editor: Bhanu P. S. Chauhan
Received27 May 2020
Revised23 Sep 2020
Accepted29 Oct 2020
Published17 Nov 2020

Abstract

Wastewater can be reused after a treatment process and compliance with high quality standards that guarantee its safe use. The wastewater treatment plant of the Autonomous University of Aguascalientes (AUA), like others, uses primary, secondary, and tertiary processes. The tertiary process followed is chlorination and is used to eliminate microorganisms from the secondary process. Although water of acceptable quality is obtained with chlorine, there is evidence that toxic substances are generated when reacting with organic matter, so alternatives to the use of chlorination have been analyzed. In the present study, silver nanoparticles were synthesized from the aqueous extract of the Opuntia ficus indica fruit peel (OfAgNPs), by reducing a 2 mM solution of AgNO3. OfAgNPs were characterized by UV-visible spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, atomic absorption spectroscopy, and dynamic light scattering, in addition to his electrophoretic mobility. The OfAgNPs are spherical, with an average particle size distribution of  nm, relatively stable at room temperature, negatively charged ( mV), and composed of 61.29% silver. The activity of OfAgNPs was evaluated in water from the effluent of the AUA treatment plant, before and after chlorination, and inhibition of bacteria Escherichia coli var 1, Enterobacter aerogenes var 1, Citrobacter freudi var 2, atypical E. coli, and aerobic mesophilic microorganism was tested.

1. Introduction

Nanotechnology is the science of the design and production of materials at nanoscale (1-100 nm), also called nanomaterials, characterized by having different physical, chemical, and biological properties than those of larger scales [1]. Within these nanomaterials are nanoparticles (NPs), which measure less than 100 nm [2]. Silver NPs (AgNPs) have been employed in various important applications in human health such as antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral, and anticancer [36].

Different NPs synthesis methods have been developed in which its physicochemical properties depend directly, such as size, surface charge, agglomeration, degree of dilution, and elemental composition [7, 8]. The synthesis of AgNPs based on chemical reduction is the most popular, simple, and high performance [9], where a metallic precursor (metallic salts) reacts with reducing agents such as sodium citrate, ascorbic acid, alcohol, and borohydride, which are toxic for the environment [10]. Furthermore, chemical synthesis processes can increase the toxicity of NPs due to its ability to absorb substances [1012]. One of the alternatives is green synthesis in which chemical reducing agents and stabilizers are replaced by proteins, vitamins, alkaloids, carbohydrates, and antioxidants, which are obtained from living organisms such as bacteria, algae, fungi, yeasts, and plants [1013]. The advantages of this technique are the following: (a) the reduction of costs during synthesis, (b) processes are simpler, and (c) the resulting product is compatible for pharmaceutical applications and for biomedical use [10, 11, 14]. Some of the plants that have been reported for green synthesis are Azadirachta indica [15], Boerhaavia diffusa [16], Malva parviflora [17], Olea chrysophylla, Lavandula dentata [18], Pelargonium beenides [19], among others.

On the other hand, wastewater is defined as water from discharges of urban, industrial, services, agricultural, livestock, and domestic uses, and it is defined as treated wastewater after it has undergone any or all of the physical, chemical, and biological processes that make it suitable for reuse [20], generally for domestic use and irrigation water. Through physical process, solid waste is separated from water; with biological process, for example, activated sludge, a consortium of microorganisms removes organic matter; and with the chemical process, the microorganisms present are eliminated, for example, by chlorination [21, 22]. A disadvantage of the chlorination process is that when chlorine reacts in the environment, it generates by-products with genotoxic, mutagenic, and carcinogenic effect [23]. For this reason, alternatives to the use of chlorine in the tertiary process are being investigated.

An important parameter to determine the quality of treated wastewater is measuring the load of indicator bacteria. This allows to indirectly calculate the presence of pathogenic microorganisms. Direct detection of pathogenic microorganisms can be a difficult and expensive process, with long analysis and culture isolation times. Furthermore, with indicator bacteria, it is possible to evaluate different physical and chemical disinfection treatments [24, 25]. The most widely used indicator microorganisms are coliforms (fecal and total) and aerobic mesophilic microorganisms [25, 26].

Opuntia ficus-indica, commonly called prickly pear, is an angiosperm and dicot plant that belongs to the Cactacea family, whose center of origin is Mexico [27, 28]. Its cultivation satisfies the food needs by consuming its stems and fruits [29, 30]. Its fruit, called prickly pear, has been shown to be a good source of nutrients and antioxidants, and it has health benefits such as protective effects of the cardiovascular system, hepatoprotector, chemopreventive, antiproliferative, anticancer, and neuroprotective [27, 31]. However, its consumption also generates food waste, since the peel makes up 56.7% of the fruit, which represents a serious environmental problem due to the potential growth of microorganisms [32].

The objective of this work was to generate AgNPs from reducing and stabilizing agents present in the aqueous extract of the prickly peel and to verify its antibacterial activity in treated wastewater before and after the chlorination process.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Reagents

The reagents were 99% AgNO3 (Karal), 2% HNO3, and Silver Standard for Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (PE Pure Atomic Spectroscopy Standard). Culture media are as follows: LB medium prepared with peptone (Bioxon), yeast extract (Bioxon), and NaCl (JT Baker); red phenol broth with lactose, MR-VP medium (DIBICO), Escherichia coli (EC) broth (Difco), methylene blue eosin agar (EMB), standard method agar, 2% bright green bile broth (BRILA), SIM medium (Bioxon), and Simmons citrate agar (MCD LAB). The water samples were taken from the effluent of the water treatment plant of the Autonomous University of Aguascalientes (AUA), after the biological treatment, before and after chlorination; the water samples were treated with 10% sodium thiosulfate to stop the effect of chlorination.

2.2. Preparation of the Prickly Pear Extract

The prickly pear peel was washed with sterile distilled water, 50 g weighed, ground with liquid nitrogen and mixed with 250 ml of sterile distilled water. The mixture was heated to 80°C in a water bath for 30 min, and the aqueous extract was recovered by filtration with Whatman No. 1 paper.

2.3. Green Synthesis of OfAgNPs

In a 250 ml flask, 10 ml of the filtered extract was mixed with 90 ml of 2 mM AgNO3 and incubated at room temperature, protected from light, with constant shaking at 90 rpm, until it changed color from yellow to reddish brown. Later, it was centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 5 min, the supernatant was decanted, and the precipitate was washed three times with sterile distilled water and once with 96% alcohol. The OfAgNPs were dried at 37°C for 24 h and pulverized and sonicated for 20 min for dispersion.

2.4. OfAgNPs Characterization
2.4.1. Obtaining the Resonance Plasmon

The colloids obtained were scanned in a wavelength range of 300-800 nm in the Thermo scientific UV-Visible Genesis 10s UV-Vis spectrophotometer.

2.4.2. Scanning Electronic Microscopy (SEM)

The dried samples were placed in the sticky graphite disc and were covered with the gold plating (Dentom Vacuum). A current flow was introduced at an estimated time of 80-150 s. The sample was introduced into the scanning electron microscope chamber, and the diameter of the OfAgNPs was measured from the micrographs with the Image J2 program [33]. Three hundred NPs were measured to obtain the size distribution histogram and the coefficient of variation (CV) was determined from the following formula:

2.4.3. Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy (EDXMA)

The OfAgNPs solid sample was mounted in the vacuum chamber of the scanning electron microscope. The sample was observed at 12 mm distance between the lens and the focal plane, at an acceleration voltage of 20 kV, spot size of 42 on the SEM monitor. On the monitor of the EDS Rx analyzer, the image that appears on the screen was selected for quantitative and qualitative analysis. Four sites of interest were analyzed in a circular area of 144 mm2. Each of the four sites was analyzed at 4000x magnification, 200 s to obtain element composition.

2.4.4. Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy

For digestion, 79.5 mg of powder containing the OfAgNPs was dissolved with 15 ml of 1 : 1 HNO3, heated to boiling, filtered through Whatman No. 1 paper, and heightened to a volume of 25 ml with distilled H2O. Samples were analyzed in a Perkin Elmer 3110 kit, and a calibration curve with 1, 2.5, and 5 ppm was made from the silver standard. An atomic absorption hollow cathode lamp was used for silver at a wavelength of 328.1 nm.

2.4.5. Hydrodynamic Diameter and Zeta Potential

The hydrodynamic diameter of the OfAgNPs was determined with the use of the Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) technique in a Zetasizer ZS90 (Malvern) equipment. Starting from a cumulative adjustment up to order two of the correlation function of the intensity dispersed at 90°, as described in the literature [34]. Zeta potential was obtained from electrophoretic mobility using the Smoluchowski model [35] available in the team’s software. The analyses were performed on an OfAgNPs colloid prepared in ultrapure water (Milli-Q) at a concentration of 100 mg/l. Measurements were taken in triplicate at times of 0, 72, 96, and 120 h.

2.5. Analysis of the Antibacterial Activity of OfAgNPs in Wastewater Samples
2.5.1. Exposure of Wastewater Samples Treated with OfAgNPs

Fifty ml samples of treated wastewater were collected in sterile containers. The samples were taken before and after chlorination (Figure 1). Two hundred μl of 10% sodium thiosulfate (Na2S2O3) was added to each of the samples.

OfAgNPs were added to 1 ml aliquots of these water samples with a 0.5 mg/ml concentration, from a stock of 5 mg/ml prepared in phosphate buffer (pH 7). To determine the minimum time of inhibition, the samples were incubated at room temperature with constant shaking and at times of 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 h; it was plated by means of the plate extension technique in LB medium. The shortest time in which there was an absence of colonies determined the minimum inhibition time (0.5 h).

OfAgNPs colloids were prepared with 0.5 and 1.0 mg/ml concentrations in a volume of 20 ml with water samples from the treatment plant; they were exposed for about 0.5 h with constant agitation at 90 rpm, and then, the microbiological analysis was performed.

2.5.2. Microbiological Analysis

The microbiological analysis was performed on the water samples that had the following treatments: (1) no treatment (control), (2) chlorination, (3) 0.5 mg/ml OfAgNPs, (4) 1.0 mg/ml of OfAgNPs, (5) chlorination with 0.5 mg/ml OfAgNPs, and (6) chlorination with 1.0 mg/ml OfAgNPs.

2.5.2.1 Total and Fecal Coliforms Determination. Total and fecal coliform microorganism determination was performed by the most probable number (MPN) method, which is divided into two phases: the presumptive and the confirmatory. Serial dilutions of water samples were made from the six treatments at 10-1, 10-2, 10-3, and 10-4. In the presumptive phase, 1 ml of each of the dilutions of the water samples was inoculated into the liquid phenol red broth liquid medium and incubated at 37°C in a period of 24-48 h. For the confirmatory phase of total coliforms, two roasts were taken from the positive tubes of the presumptive phase, from which they presented a change in coloration of the medium from red to yellow and the presence of gas. The BRILA broth was inoculated and incubated at 37°C for 24-48 h. For the confirmatory phase of fecal coliforms, two roasts were taken from the positive tubes of the confirmatory phase of total coliforms, which showed bacterial and gas growth, and the EC broth medium was inoculated and incubated at 44.5°C for a period of 24-48 h. The BRILA broth cultures that showed evident bacterial growth were inoculated in the EMB differential selective solid medium from which typical colonies were selected to then perform the biochemical tests for their identification (IMViC: Indole, Mobility, Voges Proskauer, Simmons Citrate) using the SIM semisolid medium, the MR-VP liquid medium and the Simmons citrate solid medium. All tests were performed in triplicate. Total and fecal coliforms are reported as the most probable number per 100 ml of sample (MPN/100 ml).

2.5.2.2 Aerobic Mesophilic Microorganisms Determination. The aerobic mesophilic microorganisms were counted using the plate pouring technique on the agar medium for standard methods. One ml of the dilutions of each water treatment in 20 ml of agar medium for standard methods was added and incubated at 37° C for 24-48 h. After that time, the count of the colonies was carried out and the log inhibition (log10 N0/N) was calculated for each treatment; where N0 is the initial count, and N is the count after treatment [36]. The results were analyzed by means of a one-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey test (). The graphs were made in the GraphPad Prism 6.0 program [37], considering the .

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Green Synthesis and Characterization of OfAgNPs

The synthesis of OfAgNPs was initially verified with the change of coloration to dark brown in the colloidal solution (Figure 2(a)). This coloration change is characteristic of the AgNPs synthesis due to the reduction of silver nitrate in the presence of reducing agents from the extract of the prickly pear peel, which leads to an increase in color ranging from yellow to brown, as a result of the resonance of the superficial plasmon [38]. The color of the solution depends directly on the size and shape of the AgNPs [39]. The plasmon obtained showed the spectral characteristics of the AgNPs, with a peak in a wavelength of 435 nm and a width of 150 nm (Figure 2(b)). Those characteristics allow to infer that the size of OfAgNPs is between 60 and 80 nm as reported by Mulfinger et al. [40, 41]. Similar results were obtained with the extract of Chrysanthemum indicul L. with a NPs size between 37.71 and 71.99 nm [42] and from the blackberry with a size between 12 and 50 nm [43], both with a maximum length of 435 nm. The optical properties of AgNPs result from the interaction with light, so the resonance plasmon depends on different factors such as shape, size, composition, refractive index of the metal, presence of adsorbed species, dielectric environment, electromagnetic mutual interactions, and the separation between them. These factors determine that the absorption peak is in the range of 393-738 nm [13, 40, 44, 45].

SEM analysis showed that OfAgNPs have a spherical shape (Figure 3(a)), being the most common form. Other researchers synthesized AgNPs with Capsicum annuum L. [7] and Syzygium aromaticum extract [46] resulting in NPs with spherical morphology. In the distribution size histogram, it was observed that the average diameter is  nm (Figure 3(b)), which coincides perfectly with the predictive results obtained from the resonance plasmon. AgNPs with a size of 25 nm were synthesized from the Boerhaavia disffusa extract [15] and 34 nm from Azadirachta indica [16]. The difference in size and shape between the biosynthesized AgNPs is due to temperature, pH, synthesis time, reducing agents present in the extract, and concentration of the metal precursor [47]. The coefficient of variation was 18.39, which proves that monodisperse nanoparticles exist in the colloid, and the OfAgNPs are mostly homogeneous in shape and size. These results are opposite to polydisperous biosynthesized NPs in the colloidal solution obtained from Albizia adiantifolia reported by Gengan et al. [48].

The hydrodynamic diameter values have little variation over time; at time 0, it is  nm, and at 120 h, it is  nm (Figure 4(a)). These values exceed the nanometric scale and are also greater than the value obtained in the SEM measurements. The size differences between the SEM and the hydrodynamic diameter are because the SEM measures the physical size of the metallic NPs, while the DLS measures the size of the particle together with the biomolecules that are attached to the surface of the AgNPs [49]. Similarly, the AgNPs synthesized from leaves of Brassica rapa by Narayanan and Park [50] showed a larger hydrodynamic diameter size (39.5 nm) than the average size obtained in TEM (16.14 nm). The phytochemical compounds found in the prickly pear peel extract participate as reducing agents in the synthesis and in the coating of AgNPs, which represents an advantage, since it is not necessary to add chemicals stabilizer. Alkaloids, flavones, anthracenes, terpenoids, and flavonoids present in extracts of plant stabilize and coat metallic NPs in plant biosynthesis [51]. Besides, it has been reported that aqueous extract of prickly pear peel contains phenolic acids (quercentine, kaempferol), vitamins (k1, alpha-tocopherol, beta-tocopherol), and sterols (campesterol, lanosterol and stigmasterol) [27]. These compounds could be the ones that cover the OfAgNPs. The zeta potencial values were at time 0 of  mV and at 120 h of  mV (Figure 4(b)), indicating that OfAgNPs have a negative charge and are relatively stable over time. These results coincide with those of Sufyani et al. [18] who synthesized AgNPs from Lavandula chrysophyla extract with negative charge and greater stability, having a zeta potential value of -14.3 mV, but not with those synthesized from the Olea chrysophylla extract with a low stability according to the zeta potential value of -0.877. The negative charge and the stability are provided by the molecules integrated into the surface during the synthesis process, which generate electrostatic or steric repulsion, giving them stability, avoiding agglomeration and therefore precipitation in solution [52].

The element analysis by EDXMA from OfAgNPs showed that the silver was found in the highest percentage with 61.29%. The presence of other elements was also identified such as carbon (15.40%), nitrogen (1.17%), oxygen (6.59%), magnesium (0.29%), chlorine (14.68%), and calcium (0.58%) (Figures 5(a)5(c)). Calcium and magnesium are elements present in the prickly pear peel [29]; therefore, it was expected that they form part of the synthesized NPs. Dhand et al. [53] biosynthesized AgNPs from the Coffea arabica seeds with silver as the main element. Arokiyaraj et al. [42] obtained AgNPs using extract of Chrysanthemum indicum L. made up for silver, carbon, oxygen, and chlorine. These elements are part of the covering of the AgNPs. The distribution of the elements in the sample shows that the highest percentage is silver (Figure 5(a)). By atomic absorption spectroscopy, the silver yield was calculated, where it was observed that, for 100 g of synthesized material, there is 24.15 g of silver, leading to a percentage of 24.15%. This proves that the rest of the weight of the sample are phytochemical compounds from the extract.

3.2. Antibacterial Activity Analysis of OfAgNPs

Coliform bacteria were identified in the nonchlorinated treated wastewater sample: E. coli var 1, E. aerogenes var 1, C. freundii var 2, and an atypical E. coli. These bacteria generate diseases in humans: E. coli causes diarrhea, intestinal and urinary tract infections, and meningitis [54]; E. aerogenes causes infections in the urinary tract, gastrointestinal, and respiratory system [55], and C. freundii causes sepsis and meningitis in the neonatal period [56]. Furthermore, these microorganisms are considered indicators of the presence of pathogenic organisms [26].

In the microbiological analysis of chlorinated water from the treatment plant, an elimination of 79% of the total coliform bacteria was observed. The only coliform microorganism detected was E. coli var 1, indicating the presence of fecal contamination (Table 1). The water samples, both those that went through a chlorination process and those that did not, were treated with 0.5 and 1.0 mg/ml OfAgNPs for 0.5 h. These conditions were determined considering the minimum inhibition time previously calculated. A value of 0.03 MPN/100 ml was obtained for both total and fecal coliform (Table 1), indicating the absence of these bacteria, while in the samples that only were subjected to the chlorination process, a total coliform count of 91 MPN/100 ml was obtained, which shows their presence. From this parameter, it would allow the reuse of the residual water, since the Mexican standard indicates that in order to use it in public service with direct contact, a maximum allowable limit of 240 MPN/100 ml is required, and for public services with indirect or occasionally contact, a maximum limit of 1,000 MPN/100 ml is required [20].


Tertiary treatmentTotal coliforms
(MPN/100 ml)
Faecal coliforms
(MPN/100 ml)
Identified species

No treatment430150E. coli var 1, E. aerogenes var 1, C. freundii var 2, E. coli atypical
Chlorination910.03E. coli var 1
0.5 mg/ml of OfAgNPs (0.120 mg of Ag+)0.030.03None
1.0 mg/ml de OfAgNPs (0.241 mg de Ag+)0.030.03None
Chlorination + 0.5 mg/ml of OfAgNPs0.030.03None
Chlorination + 1.0 mg/ml of OfAgNPs0.030.03None

MPN: most probably number.

According to the logarithmic inactivation results, the treatments that involve exposure to the OfAgNPs are significantly more effective than the chlorination in the inhibition of aerobic mesophilic microorganisms. The chlorination process caused 90% inhibition of aerobic mesophyll bacteria, while OfAgNPs treatments showed an inhibition greater than 99% (Figure 6). Furthermore, in these organisms, no significant differences were observed between the two concentrations of OfAgNPs evaluated in both water samples (chlorine-free and chlorinated) (Figure 6). These results showed that a treatment with 0.5 mg/ml of OfAgNPs for 0.5 h is sufficient to eliminate both coliforms and aerobic mesophyll microorganisms, proving their action against Gram (-) bacteria. It is important to highlight the availability of Ag+ in the synthesized material, because, according to the analysis of atomic absorption spectroscopy, it is equivalent to 0.120 mg and 0.241 mg of Ag+, in the samples of 0.5 and 1 mg/ml of OfAgNPs, respectively.

There is a direct relationship between the action mechanisms of AgNPs against bacteria and their characteristics, such as shape, size, surface area, agglomeration state, and surface charge [57]. The AgNPs cause cell damage because they interact directly with the membrane, and because silver ions released from AgNPs generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) which interact and damage biomolecules such as lipids, DNA, and proteins [57, 58]. Currently, biosynthesized AgNPs are recognized both for their activity against Gram (+) and Gram (-) bacteria, as well as for their low toxicity in plants and animals [5860]. Due to these observations, the use of OfAgNPs as an alternative to chlorination used as a tertiary process in wastewater treatment plants is proposed.

4. Conclusions

AgNPs were biosynthetized from aqueous extract of prickly pear fruit peel and were designated as OfAgNPs. OfAgNPs had a spherical, negatively charged morphology and were relatively stable. In addition, the growth of coliform bacteria E. coli var 1, E. aerogenes var 1, C. freundii var 2, an atypical E. coli, and aerobic mesophyll microorganisms present in treated wastewater was inhibited with 0.5 mg/ml OfAgNPs for 0.5 h. OfAgNPs presented an antimicrobial activity higher than chlorination, so they could be used as a tertiary process for wastewater treatment.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

We declare that we do not have conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the National Science and Technology Council (CONACYT) for the scholarship (766020) and Autonomous University of Aguascalientes for the investigation support; to Dr. Catalina Haro Pérez from the Complex Systems Laboratory of the Autonomous Metropolitan University, Azcapotzalco Unit; to M.C. Norma Adela Carrasco Esparza from the Microbiology Laboratory; to Dr. Ana Carbajal Hernández and Dr. Roberto Rico Martínez from the Aquatic Toxicology laboratory; and to M.C. José Luis Moreno Hernández-Duque of the Instrumental Analysis Laboratory of the Autonomous University of Aguascalientes.

References

  1. N. A. Singh, “Nanotechnology definitions, research, industry and property rights,” Nanoscience in Food and Agriculture, vol. 1, pp. 43–64, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  2. M. Boholm and R. Arvidsson, “A definition framework for the terms nanomaterial and nanoparticle,” NanoEthics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 25–40, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. W. R. Li, X. B. Xie, Q. S. Shi, H. Y. Zeng, Y. S. OU-Yang, and Y. B. Chen, “Antibacterial activity and mechanism of silver nanoparticles on Escherichia coli,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 1115–1122, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. V. Gopinath and P. Velusamy, “Extracellular biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using Bacillus sp. GP-23 and evaluation of their antifungal activity towards Fusarium oxysporum,” Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, vol. 106, pp. 170–174, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. S. Galdiero, M. Rai, A. Gade et al., “Antiviral activity of mycosynthesized silver nanoparticles against herpes simplex virus and human parainfluenza virus type 3,” International Journal of Nanomedicine, vol. 8, p. 4303, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. K. Vasanth, K. Ilango, R. MohanKumar, A. Agrawal, and G. P. Dubey, “Anticancer activity of Moringa oleifera mediated silver nanoparticles on human cervical carcinoma cells by apoptosis induction,” Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, vol. 117, pp. 354–359, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. S. Li, Y. Shen, A. Xie et al., “Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Capsicum annuum L. extract,” Green Chemistry, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 852–858, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. F. Viñes, “Simulating heterogeneous catalysis on metallic nanoparticles: from under-coordinated sites to extended facets,” Frontiers of Nanoscience, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 101–128, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. Q. Zhang, N. Li, J. Goebl, Z. Lu, and Y. Yin, “A Systematic Study of the Synthesis of Silver Nanoplates: Is Citrate a “Magic” Reagent?” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 133, no. 46, pp. 18931–18939, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. S. Iravani, H. Korbekandi, S. V. Mirmohammadi, and B. Zolfaghari, “Synthesis of silver nanoparticles: chemical, physical and biological methods,” Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 385–406, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  11. A. A. Hebeish, M. H. El-Rafie, F. A. Abdel-Mohdy, E. S. Abdel-Halim, and H. E. Emam, “Carboxymethyl cellulose for green synthesis and stabilization of silver nanoparticles,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 933–941, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. S. Iravani, “Green synthesis of metal nanoparticles using plants,” Green Chemistry, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 2638–2650, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. L. Wei, J. Lu, H. Xu, A. Patel, Z. Chen, and G. Chen, “Silver nanoparticles: synthesis, properties, and therapeutic applications,” Drug Discovery Today, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 595–601, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. Gómez-Garzón, “Nanomaterials, nanoparticles and green synthesis,” Repertoire of Medicine and Surgery Magazine, vol. 27, no. 2, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  15. S. Ahmed, M. Saifullah, B. Ahmad, L. Swami, and S. Ikram, “Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Azadirachta indicaaqueous leaf extract,” Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. P. P. N. Vijay Kumar, S. V. N. Pammi, P. Kollu, K. V. V. Satyanarayana, and U. Shameem, “Green synthesis and characterization of silver nanoparticles using Boerhaavia diffusa plant extract and their anti bacterial activity,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 52, pp. 562–566, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. M. F. Zayed, W. H. Eisa, and A. A. Shabaka, “Malva parviflora extract assisted green synthesis of silver nanoparticles,” Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, vol. 98, pp. 423–428, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. N. M. al Sufyani, N. A. Hussien, and Y. M. Hawsawi, “Characterization and Anticancer Potential of Silver Nanoparticles Biosynthesized from Olea chrysophylla and Lavandula dentata Leaf Extracts on HCT116 Colon Cancer Cells,” Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2019, Article ID 7361695, 9 pages, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. M. Kgatshe, O. S. Aremu, L. Katata-Seru, and R. Gopane, “Characterization and Antibacterial Activity of Biosynthesized Silver Nanoparticles Using the Ethanolic Extract of Pelargonium sidoides DC,” Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2019, Article ID 3501234, 10 pages, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. Mexican Official Standard NOM-003-ECOL-1997, Federation’s Official Journal. Mexico City, Mexico, 1998.
  21. G. P. Winward, L. M. Avery, T. Stephenson, and B. Jefferson, “Chlorine disinfection of grey water for reuse: effect of organics and particles,” Water Research, vol. 42, no. 1-2, pp. 483–491, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. G. Moeller and A. Tomasi, “Microbiology of activated sludge” Mexican Institute of Water Technology (IMTA). View at: Google Scholar
  23. J. B. da Costa, S. Rodgher, L. A. Daniel, and E. L. G. Espíndola, “Toxicity on aquatic organisms exposed to secondary effluent disinfected with chlorine, peracetic acid, ozone and UV radiation,” Ecotoxicology, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 1803–1813, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. National Research Council, Indicators for waterborne pathogens, National Academies Press, 2004.
  25. S. Rós-Tobón, R. M. Agudelo-Cadavid, and L. A. Gutiérrez-Builes, “Pathogens and microbiological indicators of water quality for human consumption,” National School of Public Health Magazine, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 236–247, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  26. P. Tallon, B. Magajna, C. Lofranco, and K. T. Leung, “Microbial indicators of faecal contamination in water: a current perspective,” Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, vol. 166, no. 1-4, pp. 139–166, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. K. el-Mostafa, Y. el Kharrassi, A. Badreddine et al., “Nopal cactus (Opuntia ficus-indica) as a source of bioactive compounds for nutrition, health and disease,” Molecules, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 14879–14901, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. X. Aparicio-Fernández, S. Loza-Cornejo, M. G. Torres-Bernal, N. J. Velázquez Placencia, and H. J. Arreola Nava, “Physicochemical characteristics of fruits of wild Opuntia varieties from two semi-arid regions of Jalisco, Mexico,” Polibotánica, vol. 43, pp. 219–244, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  29. G. A. Becerril and C. B. P. Valdivia, “Physiological alterations caused by drought in prickly pear (Opuntia ficus-indica),” Mexican Plant Technology Magazine, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 231–237, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  30. P. Cerezal and G. Duarte, “Sensory influence of chemical additives on prickly pears (Opuntia ficus-indica (L.) Miller) peeled in syrup preserved by combined methods,” Journal of the Professional Association for Cactus Development, vol. 6, pp. 102–119, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  31. M. A. Livrea and L. Tesoriere, “Health benefits and bioactive components of the fruits from Opuntia ficus-indica L. Mill,” Journal of the Professional Association for cactus Development, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 73–90, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  32. W. Russ and R. Meyer-Pittroff, “Utilizing waste products from the food production and processing industries,” Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 57–62, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. C. T. Rueden, J. Schindelin, M. C. Hiner et al., “ImageJ2: ImageJ for the next generation of scientific image data,” BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 529, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. B. J. Berne and R. Pecora, Dynamic light scattering with applications to chemistry, biology and physics, Dover Publications, 2000.
  35. A. V. Delgado, F. Gonzalez-Caballero, R. J. Hunter, L. K. Koopal, and J. Lyklema, “Measurement and interpretation of electrokinetic phenomena (IUPAC technical report),” Pure and Applied Chemistry, vol. 77, no. 10, pp. 1753–1805, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. C. Garcidueñas-Piña, I. E. Medina-Ramírez, P. Guzmán, R. Rico-Martínez, J. F. Morales-Domínguez, and I. Rubio-Franchini, “Evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of nanostructured materials of titanium dioxide doped with silver and/or copper and their effects onArabidopsis thaliana,” International Journal of Photoenergy, vol. 2016, Article ID 8060847, 14 pages, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. “One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was performed using Graph Pad Prism version 7.00 for Windows,” Graph Pad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA, http://www.graphpad.com/. View at: Google Scholar
  38. G. Suresh, P. H. Gunasekar, D. Kokila et al., “Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Delphinium denudatum root extract exhibits antibacterial and mosquito larvicidal activities,” Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, vol. 127, pp. 61–66, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. S. J. Oldenburg, Silver nanoparticles: properties and applications, Sigma-Aldrich Co., 2014.
  40. A. Chhatre, P. Solasa, S. Sakle, R. Thaokar, and A. Mehra, “Color and surface plasmon effects in nanoparticle systems: case of silver nanoparticles prepared by microemulsion route,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, vol. 404, pp. 83–92, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. L. Mulfinger, S. D. Solomon, M. Bahadory, A. V. Jeyarajasingam, S. A. Rutkowsky, and C. Boritz, “Synthesis and study of silver nanoparticles,” Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 84, no. 2, p. 322, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. S. Arokiyaraj, M. V. Arasu, S. Vincent et al., “Rapid green synthesis of silver nanoparticles from Chrysanthemum indicum L and its antibacterial and cytotoxic effects: an in vitro study,” International Journal of Nanomedicine, vol. 9, p. 379, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. B. Kumar, K. Smita, L. Cumbal, and A. Debut, “Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Andean blackberry fruit extract,” Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 45–50, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. J. Ren and R. D. Tilley, “Preparation, self-assembly, and mechanistic study of highly monodispersed nanocubes,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 129, no. 11, pp. 3287–3291, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. T. Huang and X. H. N. Xu, “Synthesis and characterization of tunable rainbow colored colloidal silver nanoparticles using single-nanoparticle plasmonic microscopy and spectroscopy,” Journal of Materials Chemistry, vol. 20, no. 44, pp. 9867–9876, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. K. Venugopal, H. A. Rather, K. Rajagopal et al., “Synthesis of silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs) for anticancer activities (MCF 7 breast and A549 lung cell lines) of the crude extract of Syzygium aromaticum,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, vol. 167, pp. 282–289, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. M. Shah, D. Fawcett, S. Sharma, S. K. Tripathy, and G. E. J. Poinern, “Green synthesis of metallic nanoparticles via biological entities,” Materials, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 7278–7308, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. R. M. Gengan, K. Anand, A. Phulukdaree, and A. Chuturgoon, “A549 lung cell line activity of biosynthesized silver nanoparticles using Albizia adianthifolia leaf,” Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, vol. 105, pp. 87–91, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. E. Bernardo-Mazariegos, B. Valdez-Salas, D. González-Mendoza et al., “Silver nanoparticles from Justicia spicigera and their antimicrobial potentialities in the biocontrol of foodborne bacteria and phytopathogenic fungi,” Revista Argentina de Microbiologia, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 103–109, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. K. B. Narayanan and H. H. Park, “Antifungal activity of silver nanoparticles synthesized using turnip leaf extract (Brassica rapa L.) against wood rotting pathogens,” European Journal of Plant Pathology, vol. 140, no. 2, pp. 185–192, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. K. B. Narayanan and N. Sakthivel, “Phytosynthesis of gold nanoparticles using leaf extract of Coleus amboinicus Lour,” Materials Characterization, vol. 61, no. 11, pp. 1232–1238, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. S. H. Lee and B. H. Jun, “Silver nanoparticles: synthesis and application for nanomedicine,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 20, no. 4, p. 865, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. V. Dhand, L. Soumya, S. Bharadwaj, S. Chakra, D. Bhatt, and B. Sreedhar, “Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Coffea arabica seed extract and its antibacterial activity,” Materials Science and Engineering: C, vol. 58, pp. 36–43, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. J. B. Kaper, J. P. Nataro, and H. L. Mobley, “Pathogenic Escherichia coli,” Nature Reviews Microbiology, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 123–140, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. A. Davin-Regli and J. M. Pagès, “Enterobacter aerogenes and Enterobacter cloacae; versatile bacterial pathogens confronting antibiotic treatment,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 6, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. T. I. Doran, “The role of Citrobacter in clinical disease of Children: Review,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 384–394, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. Y. N. Slavin, J. Asnis, U. O. Häfeli, and H. Bach, “Metal nanoparticles: understanding the mechanisms behind antibacterial activity,” Journal of Nanobiotechnology, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 65, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. S. Some, I. Kumar Sen, A. Mandal et al., “Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles and their versatile antimicrobial properties,” Materials Research Express, vol. 6, no. 1, article 012001, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. E. Pazos-Ortiz, J. H. Roque-Ruiz, E. A. Hinojos-Márquez et al., “Dose-Dependent Antimicrobial Activity of Silver Nanoparticles on Polycaprolactone Fibers against Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bacteria,” Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2017, Article ID 4752314, 9 pages, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. P. Rauwel, S. Küünal, S. Ferdov, and E. Rauwel, “A review on the green synthesis of silver nanoparticles and their morphologies studied via TEM,” Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 2015, Article ID 682749, 9 pages, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 Mariana G. Muñoz-Carrillo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views818
Downloads524
Citations

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.