Journal of Nanomaterials

Journal of Nanomaterials / 2020 / Article
Special Issue

Metal Oxide Nanomaterials for Safe and Sustainable Water Treatment Technologies

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 |Article ID 8159628 |

Andrei Ivanets, Vladimir Prozorovich, Marina Roshchina, Inga Grigoraviciute-Puroniene, Aleksej Zarkov, Aivaras Kareiva, Zhao Wang, Varsha Srivastava, Mika Sillanpää, "Heterogeneous Fenton Oxidation Using Magnesium Ferrite Nanoparticles for Ibuprofen Removal from Wastewater: Optimization and Kinetics Studies", Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2020, Article ID 8159628, 9 pages, 2020.

Heterogeneous Fenton Oxidation Using Magnesium Ferrite Nanoparticles for Ibuprofen Removal from Wastewater: Optimization and Kinetics Studies

Academic Editor: Mohamed Bououdina
Received22 May 2020
Revised12 Aug 2020
Accepted26 Aug 2020
Published16 Sep 2020


In this study, the catalytic properties of Fenton-like catalyst based on magnesium ferrite nanoparticles for IBP degradation were examined. Structural and morphological studies showed the low crystallinity and mesoporous structure for the catalyst obtained via a glycine-nitrate method. The influences of catalyst dosage, oxidant concentration, and solution pH on the pollutant degradation were investigated. The pseudo-first-order model describes kinetic data, and under optimal condition (catalyst dose of 0.5 g L-1, H2O2 concentration of 20.0 mM, and pH of 8.0), apparent rate constant reached 0.091 min-1. It was shown that Fenton reaction was mainly induced by iron atoms on the catalyst surface, which is supported by very low iron leaching (up to 0.05 mg L-1) and high catalytic activity at neutral solution pH (6.0-8.0). It was found that the IBP mineralization onto magnesium ferrite catalyst was rapid and reached up to 98-100% within 40 min. Thus, prepared magnesium ferrite nanoparticles can be used as an effective Fenton-like catalyst for the IBP degradation from wastewater.

1. Introduction

Ibuprofen (IBP) is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, which is widely used to treat fever, pain, and inflammation of minor injury. IBP was the first member of propionic acid derivatives introduced in 1969. It is used as an analgesic and antipyretic drug for adults and children. IBP was rated as the safest conventional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug by spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting systems in the UK [1]. The high annual consumption is about 200 tons per year, and low metabolite conversion of IBP in the human body leads to the presence of IBP derivatives in the wastewater treatment plant, in surface water, and even in drinking water [2]. Ingestion of IBP in the environment leads to significant negative consequences. The municipal wastewater treatment plant, common water treatment processes, such as coagulation/flocculation and filtration, and biological treatment do not remove efficiently the pharmaceuticals and personal care products, which signifies the importance to develop new methods for removing these products from water bodies [3, 4].

Adsorption, sonolysis and sono-Fenton oxidation, photocatalytic oxidation, noncatalytic and catalytic ozonation, persulfate-based Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs), and heterogeneous Fenton processes are widely used for IBP removal from wastewater. The application of aforementioned methods is limited by their technical or economic disadvantages. Thus, adsorption methods are well suited for removing trace amounts of pharmaceuticals and cleaning relatively small volumes of water. Otherwise, the regeneration of the sorbent requires the destruction of sorbed toxic pharmaceuticals or their metabolites [5]. Electrochemical oxidation and ozonation belong to high-energy consumption methods, which is not always economically feasible. In addition, these methods are characterized by the formation of large quantities of oxidation products that are more toxic than the original pharmaceuticals [6, 7]. Despite their attractiveness in the laboratory, photocatalytic methods are not widely used on an industrial scale [8, 9]. This is due to their high sensitivity to the turbidity of wastewater, the complexity of the design of catalytic reactors that provide the necessary conditions for effective destruction of pollutants, and the need to use UV irradiation to achieve a high degree of mineralization of pharmaceutical contaminants [10, 11].

To avoid of these disadvantages, the application of heterogeneous catalyst based on iron oxides and metal ferrites is a promising solution [12]. Magnesium ferrite is a good candidate as an effective Fenton-like catalyst due to their affinity for various pollutants [13], high catalytic activity at a wide range of pH [14], and low metal ion leaching [15]. Therefore, magnesium ferrite has a high affinity towards inorganic and organic pollutants, which improved their catalytic efficiency due to concentration of the removed molecules in surface sites [16]. The degradation of Carbamazepine and Ciprofloxacin [17], Bisphenol A [18], and textile dyes [19, 20] onto metal ferrites such Fenton-like catalysts is widely reported. However, magnesium ferrite application for the degradation of pharmaceuticals is still limited.

In this paper, a nanostructured magnesium ferrite prepared by self-combustion sol-gel method was studied as heterogeneous Fenton-like catalyst for the IBP degradation. This work particularly evaluates the effects of the main AOP parameters: dose of catalyst, H2O2 oxidant concentration, and solution pH for optimization the IBP degradation. Also, kinetics parameters of the IBP degradation process were studied by means of HPLC technique and TOC analysis to establish the degree of IBP mineralization.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemical Reagents and Magnesium Ferrite Catalyst

Magnesium nitrate (Mg(NO3)2), ferrous nitrate (Fe(NO3)3), sodium chloride (NaCl), and glycine (H2NCH2COOH) reagents were purchased from “Five Ocean” Corporation (Belarus) and used to obtain a catalyst based on magnesium ferrite nanoparticles. IBP (Table 1) and H2O2 solution 30 wt. % were supplied by Sigma-Aldrich. All reagents were used as received without additional purification. Deionized water (resistance of 18.2 MΩ·cm-1) was used for the preparation of all aqueous solutions.

Molecule structure imageCAS no.Empirical formulaMolecular weight (g mol-1)pKalogKowSolubility in water (mg L-1)


Magnesium ferrite nanoparticles were prepared by self-combustion glycine-nitrate synthesis. Magnesium nitrate, ferrous nitrate, glycine, and sodium chloride as an inert additive were dissolved in deionized water in molar ratio 1 : 2 : 4.5 : 10, respectively. The prepared mixture was vaporized at 80°C under vigorous stirring before preparing a thick gel. Further, heating of the gel mass resulted in its spontaneous combustion. The obtained mixture of magnesium ferrite, coal, and sodium chloride was heated at 300°C for 5 h. Magnesium ferrite nanoparticle was washed by deionized water and removed by a magnet. A detailed preparation method of magnesium ferrite has been previously reported [13].

2.2. Catalytic Experiments and Kinetics Modeling

Catalytic experiments were conducted in 50 mL centrifuge tubes at 20°C under natural light. Taking into account that IBP [21] is a weak acid () with low solubility in water (21 mg L-1) (Table 1), the working IBP solution (10 mg L-1) was prepared by dissolution of the required powder sample in deionized water under vigorous stirring. In all experiments, IBP solutions were kept in the dark for 30 minutes after the addition of catalysts until the adsorption equilibrium was reached.

To determine the effect of the catalytic process conditions onto the efficiency of IBP (10.0 mg L-1) degradation, the dosage of catalyst (0.2-1.0 g L-1), H2O2 concentration (10.0-30.0 mmol L-1), pH of the solution (4.0-8.0), and contact time (5-40 minutes) were varied. For the evaluation the degree of IBP catalytic degradation and mineralization, MgFe2O4 catalyst with a given dosage of catalyst, H2O2 concentration was added to the IBP (10.0 mg L-1) aliquot of 50.0 mL.

Preliminarily, it was checked that the addition of 10.0-30.0 mmol L-1 H2O2 without catalyst did not result in IBP (10.0 mg L-1) oxidation during 2 hours. Therefore, during the adsorption stage, IBP concentration was decreased on approximately 2-10% depending on the dosage of catalyst (0.2-1.0 g L-1). These changes in IBP concentration were taken into account when calculating heterogeneous oxidation data. It should be noted that preliminary adsorption is a favorable process for efficient oxidation of organic pollutants [16]. After that, a required amount of H2O2 was added immediately into IBP/catalyst suspension and the catalytic process was initiated. At 5-, 10-, 20-, 30-, and 40-minute intervals, 5.0 mL solution containing solid catalyst particles were taken out and the liquid phase was separated by using a centrifuge (Model Eppendorf 5810R) with a speed of 5000 rpm for 3 minutes for an IBP degradation efficiency test. According to empirical chemical reaction describing the fully IBP mineralization by H2O2 (Equation (1)), the stoichiometric amount of H2O2 (1.60 mmol L-1) is much less than it was used in catalytic experiments.

The use of such an excessive amount of H2O2 may be due to the following: (i) low efficiency of reactive oxygen-containing spices (ROS) formation, (ii) low lifetime of OH-radicals, and (iii) fast recombination of produced hole-electron pairs [22]. The chosen interval of H2O2 concentration is in a good correlation with other results related to IBP heterogeneous Fenton oxidation [23]. All adsorption and catalytic experiments were repeated at least twice to ensure the reproducibility of the results.

The degradation efficiency and mineralization efficiency of IBP were calculated according to where and are the concentrations (mg L−1) of the IBP sample measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) at initial time (minutes) and and are the total organic carbon of the IBP sample at initial time (minutes), respectively.

Typically, the Fenton-like catalytic processes are usually well characterized by the Langmuir-Hinshelwood kinetic model, which describes a pseudo-first-order kinetics (Equation (3)) at low initial organic pollutant concentration [24]. where and are the concentrations (mg L−1) of the IBP sample measured at initial time (min) and is the apparent pseudo-first-order rate constant (min-1).

3. Analytical Methods

The crystalline structure and phase analysis of magnesium ferrite nanoparticles were obtained using an X-ray diffractometer (PANalytical) with KαCo radiation (). The domain size of prepared magnesium ferrite catalysts was calculated from the data of full-width at half-maximum (FWHM) of the (311) diffraction through the Scherrer equation. where is average particle size (nm), is the wavelength of KαCo radiation, and and are the position (degree) and the half-width (radian) of the diffraction peak (311) in the experimental XRD patterns, respectively.

Fourier transform infra-red (FTIR) spectra of the catalyst were recorded on Bruker Vertex 70 FTIR in the range of a wavenumber of 400-4000 cm-1. Adsorption properties were evaluated by a nitrogen adsorption-desorption method (-196°C) on a Micromeritics-Tristar II Plus specific surface area and porosity analyzer. A specific surface area (, m2 g-1) was calculated by the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method. The total pore volume ( (cm3 g-1)) was estimated at using the Horvath–Kawazoe method. The average pore diameter (Dsp des (nm)) was calculated by the equation (4) × 1000 × Vsp des/ABET. The point of zero charge (pHpzc) was determined by the graphical drift method [25]. For this, 40 mg MgFe2O4 was placed in an aliquot of 10.0 mL and 0.01 M NaCl solution in the pH range of 3.0-12.0 and was stirred for 48 hours. Then, the sorbent was separated from the solution and the equilibrium pH value was measured.

The concentration of IBP in initial solution and treated solution was analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC-Shimadzu). Acetonitrile and potassium phosphate monobasic buffer (50 : 50, ) was used for the mobile phase, and the flow-rate was maintained at 1.0 mL min−1. A TOC analyzer (Shimadzu, Japan) was used for measuring IBP mineralization degree.

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Characterization of Magnesium Ferrite Catalyst

As shown in Figure 1(a), the peaks in XRD spectra are referred to patterns of MgFe2O4 with cubic spinel structures. The peaks at values of 35.14°, 41.46°, 50.54°, 67.37°, and 74.28° belong to (202), (311), (400), (511), and (404) crystallographic planes of magnesium ferrite (JCPDS No. 96–900-3804), respectively. The calculated parameter of the crystal lattice is 5.961 Å, which is different from the reference value for MgFe2O4 and may be due to a defect in the crystal structure of the resulting sample. The domain size of the prepared catalyst calculated from the Scherrer equation was about 2.2 nm (Table 2). The absorption peak on the IR spectrum (Figure 1(b)) at 547 cm-1 corresponds to the deformation vibrations of Fe–O and Mg–O for magnesium ferrite, which confirms the formation of MgFe2O4 with a cubic spinel structure [26]. Peaks at 1592 and 1454 cm-1 belong to the fluctuations of the hydroxyl group O–H, which largely determine the sorption properties of magnesium ferrite. The absorption band at 3337 and 3219 cm-1 refers to the valence vibrations of adsorbed water molecules. Texture parameters (BET surface area, pore volume, and average pore size) are listed in Table 2. The nitrogen isotherms of magnesium ferrite catalyst are related to type IV isotherms indicating its characteristic of mesoporous characteristics with H1 hysteresis loop corresponding to the cylindrical pore [27]. The BET surface area, pore volume, and average pore size of the catalyst were 14 m2 g−1, 0.037 cm3 g-1, and 11 nm, respectively. The pHpzc for the prepared catalyst was 6.58 (Table 2). It means that due to protonation of M–OH (M : Mg or Fe) groups in acidic solution, the surface of magnesium ferrite nanoparticles had positive charge. An increase of accompanied by dissociation of M–OH groups, which leads to a change of the surface charge to negative. It is an important characteristic for the explanation of catalytic efficiency depends on the pH of IBP solution.

Parameters of crystalline structureTextural characteristicsSurface chemistry
Cell param. (Å) (nm)Type of isotherm/hysteresis loop (m2 g-1) (cm3 g-1) (nm)pHpzc


4.2. Effect of Experimental Conditions on IBP Degradation
4.2.1. Dose of Solid Catalyst

The kinetic curves of IBP degradation on magnesium ferrite nanoparticles as a function of catalyst dose are shown in Figure 2. The IBP degradation sharply increased with an increasing catalyst dose from 0.2 until an optimal value of 0.5 g L-1. A further increase of magnesium ferrite concentration up to 1.0 g L-1 was affected positively only at the first 20 minutes. Intrestingly, IBP degradation efficiency were equal for the catalytic reaction time of 30-40 min. The increase of catalytic efficiency is dependent on the catalyst dose, but not proportionally. It is in accordance with the argument that the concentration of active catalytic sites on the surface of catalyst in the heterogeneous Fenton process for a dose of 0.5-1.0 g L-1 is a not limiting parameter for reactive oxygen spices producing. This observation is consistent with previous studies for the methylene blue degradation [16]. Compared to the homogenous Fenton process where the catalytic activity is dependent on ferrous/ferric ion concentration, the efficiency of the heterogeneous Fenton process mostly depends on the state of surface Fe-OH sites. This is due to a low concentration of leached iron from a magnesium ferrite catalyst (less than 0.05 mg L-1 for catalyst dose of 1.0 g L-1). At the same time, higher differences in the rate of IBP degradation at the initial stage (up to 10 minutes) for different doses of catalysts indicate the participation of leached iron ions in the catalytic process.

Based on the correlation coefficient () in Figure 2, the pseudo-first-order model is the most suitable model describing the catalytic kinetics of IBP degradation on magnesium ferrite nanoparticles. The calculated apparent rate constants for 0.2, 0.5, and 1.0 g L-1 dose were 0.019, 0.070, and 0.099 min-1, respectively. A higher number of catalytically active sites for H2O2 decomposition and reactive oxygen species generation could explain the positive effect of a solid catalyst.

4.2.2. H2O2 Concentration

It is well known that at high concentration H2O2 can act as scavenger of OH radicals (Equation (5)), reducing the efficiency of organic compounds catalytic degradation [28, 29]. Therefore, the efficiency of the heterogeneous Fenton process increases only until reaching optimal H2O2 concentration. For evaluating the optimum amount of H2O2, the IBP catalytic degradation tests were carried out for the initial concentration of 10.0, 20.0, and 30.0 mM.

According to Figure 3, the rate of IBP degradation proportionally increased in a 10.0-30.0 mM H2O2 range. Increasing H2O2 concentration from 10.0 to 30.0 mM was accompanied by an increase in the apparent pseudo-first-order rate constant from 0.035 to 0.107 min-1. It should be noted that the used concentrations of H2O2 significantly exceeded the stoichiometric value required for the complete mineralization of IBP. It might result from the H2O2 decomposition without the production of OH radicals [30] or to the formation of small organic compounds exhibiting a slower rate constant for the radical attack [31].

4.2.3. pH of Model Solution

The pH of solution is the determining parameter that limits the efficiency of the homogeneous Fenton process. This is due to the existence of different forms of iron ions, such as ferric ions, mono- or polyhydroxy nuclear complexes, and colloidal particles. As a rule, the highest activity of the homogenous Fenton process reaches a pH of 2.8 [32], while heterogeneous Fenton reaction favored acidic and is close to neutral pH [33]. The influence of pH was investigated at close to neutral conditions (-8.0), while the IBP solution had . The range of pH was chosen close to real wastewater from pharmaceutical plants [34].

According to Figure 4, the highest IBP degradation efficiency and  min-1 were performed at neutral (6.0) and slightly alkaline (8.0) pH, respectively. Taking into account IBP (Table 1) and magnesium ferrite (Table 2), at this pH range, IBP is present in an anionic form and catalysts have negative charge leading to electrostatic repulsion. It means that the active sites of catalyst do not occur by IBP and free for interaction with H2O2. Similar results were obtained for methylene blue degradation on magnesium ferrite catalyst [16].

4.3. Evaluation of IBP Degradation and Mineralization

Generally, IBP degradation was accompanied by the formation of various byproducts. Adityosulindro et al. [23] reported about up 14 transformation products of IBP (1-hydroxy IBP, 2-hydroxy-IBP, 4-isobutylacetophenon, etc.) during Fenton oxidation on Fe-containing zeolite. This result correlates with a low IBP mineralization degree that is less than 0.6 according to TOC analysis. To confirm the effectiveness of IBP mineralization on magnesium ferrite Fenton catalyst, the comparison data of HPLC and TOC analyses are shown in diagrams (Figure 5) for model solution after 40-minute reaction. The effect of doses of magnesium ferrite catalyst, H2O2 concentrations, and pH of the solutions on degree of IBP degradation and mineralization were studied. It is extremely important to note that for all experimental conditions, the IBP mineralization degree was close to 98-100%. Only for the lowest dose of magnesium ferrite catalyst (0.2 g L-1) and H2O2 concentration (10.0 mM) differences in HPLC and TOC data were observed (Figures 5(a) and 5(b)), when IBP mineralization degrees were about 48 and 88%, respectively.

4.4. Comparison with Fenton-Like Catalysts and Photocatalysts

Comparative data on the catalytic IBP degradation (Table 3) show that magnesium ferrite demonstrates high catalytic activity and exceeds many Fenton-like catalysts and photocatalysts in terms of the apparent rate constant. An important advantage of the obtained catalyst is the high rate of IBP oxidation. Almost complete mineralization was achieved within 40 min, while the other catalysts require time from 60 to 180 min, which is important for practical application. The relatively high initial concentration of H2O2 used in this work is due to performing the catalytic process under natural light and the high IBP concentration in the model solutions. The main advantage of the developed Fenton-like catalyst is the complete IBP mineralization during their oxidative degradation.

CatalystsConditions, min-1References

TiO2-boron nitride nanocomposite
 g L-1,  mg L-1, , UV light irradiation,  min0.047
Fe-zeolite catalyst (of ZSM5 type) g L-1,  mM, ,  mg L-1, °C,  min0.014[23]
Recycled rusted iron particles g L-1,  mM, , μg L-1, °C,  min0.140[35]
Zeolite-TiO2-UV/ultrasound/H2O2 g L-1,  mM, , °C,  min,  W0.031[36]
Ultrasound/BaTiO3 nanowires/piezoelectric catalytic persulfate g L-1,  mM,  mg L-1,  min0.082[37]
Co3O4 : Bi (1 : 2) nanocomposite g L-1,  mg L-1, , °C,  min, visible light irradiation0.094[38]
 g L-1, μg L-1, , °C,  min,  W
 g L-1, μg L-1, , °C,  min,  W
FeOx-MnOx/SBA-15 g L-1,  mM, μg L-1, , °C,  min0.032[40]
10 wt% g-C3N4/MIL-68(In)-NH2 g L-1,  mg L-1, , °C,  min,  W0.017[41]
MgFe2O4 g L-1,  mM,  mg L-1, , °C,  min0.091This study

5. Conclusions

Fenton-like catalyst based on magnesium ferrite nanoparticles characterized by low crystallinity (lattice parameter of 5.961 Å, crystallite size of 2.2 nm) and mesoporous structure (BET specific area of 14 m2 g-1, sorption volume of 0.030 cm3 g-1, and average pore size of 11 nm) was synthesized. The influence of the conditions of the catalytic process (dose of catalyst, H2O2 concentration, and pH of solution) on the efficiency of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug IBP degradation was established. The reaction followed the pseudo-first-order kinetics with respect to IBP, and the apparent rate constant increased almost proportionally with catalyst loading and H2O2 concentration. It was shown that at the catalyst dose of 0.5 g L-1, H2O2 concentration of 20.0 mM, and pH of 8.0 for 40 min, the IBP concentration from 10.0 mg L-1 achieved less than detected limit and the IBP mineralization reached 98-100%. The conducted research has shown the prospects of the practical application of the developed Fenton-like heterogeneous catalyst for wastewater treatment from pharmaceutically active compounds.

Data Availability

The manuscript data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.


This work was financially supported by Belarusian Republican Foundation for Fundamental Research (No. X19LITG-007) and Research grant NOCAMAT (No. S-LB-19-2) from the Research Council of Lithuania. The authors are grateful to MOST Programme for the scholarships of Andrei Ivanets (No. R-wY4k-52961) and Vladimir Prozorovich (No. R-Jae2-52969) and to the World Federation of Scientists for the scholarship of Vladimir Prozorovich (Belarus National Scholarship Programme).


  1. R. Bushra and N. Aslam, “An overview of clinical pharmacology of ibuprofen,” Oman Medical Journal, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 155–161, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. S. Fekadu, E. Alemayehu, R. Dewil, and B. Van der Bruggen, “Pharmaceuticals in freshwater aquatic environments: a comparison of the African and European challenge,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 654, pp. 324–337, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. A. Jelic, M. Gros, A. Ginebreda et al., “Occurrence, partition and removal of pharmaceuticals in sewage water and sludge during wastewater treatment,” Water Research, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 1165–1176, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. A. Courtier, A. Cadiere, and B. Roig, “Human pharmaceuticals: why and how to reduce their presence in the environment,” Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, vol. 15, pp. 77–82, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. J. Ahmed, “Adsorption of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs from aqueous solution using activated carbons: review,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 190, pp. 274–282, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. C.-H. Hung, C. Yuan, M.-H. Wu, and Y.-C. Chang, “Electrochemical degradation of ibuprofen-contaminated soils over Fe/Al oxidation electrodes,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 640-641, pp. 1205–1213, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. S. Saeid, P. Tolvanen, N. Kumar et al., “Advanced oxidation process for the removal of ibuprofen from aqueous solution: a non-catalytic and catalytic ozonation study in a semi-batch reactor,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 230, pp. 77–90, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. N. Fu, X.-C. Ren, and J.-X. Wan, “The effect of molar ratios of Ti/Si on core-shell SiO2@TiO2Nanoparticles for photocatalytic applications,” Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2020, Article ID 5312376, 11 pages, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. Z. Wang, V. Srivastava, I. Ambat, Z. Safaei, and M. Sillanpää, “Degradation of Ibuprofen by UV-LED/catalytic advanced oxidation process,” Journal of Water Process Engineering, vol. 31, article 100808, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. L. Lin, W. Jiang, M. Bechelany et al., “Adsorption and photocatalytic oxidation of ibuprofen using nanocomposites of TiO2 nanofibers combined with BN nanosheets: degradation products and mechanisms,” Chemosphere, vol. 220, pp. 921–929, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. A. Raja, P. Rajasekaran, K. Selvakumar, M. Arivanandhan, S. Asath Bahadur, and M. Swaminathan, “Rational fabrication of needle with spherical shape ternary reduced Graphene Oxide-HoVO4-TiO2 photocatalyst for degradation of ibuprofen under visible light,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 513, article 145803, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. K. K. Kefeni, B. B. Mamba, and T. A. M. Msagati, “Application of spinel ferrite nanoparticles in water and wastewater treatment: a review,” Separation and Purification Technology, vol. 188, pp. 399–422, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. A. I. Ivanets, V. Srivastava, M. Y. Roshchina, M. Sillanpää, V. G. Prozorovich, and V. V. Pankov, “Magnesium ferrite nanoparticles as a magnetic sorbent for the removal of Mn2+, Co2+, Ni2+ and Cu2+ from aqueous solution,” Ceramics International, vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 9097–9104, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. L. T. T. Nguyen, L. T. H. Nguyen, N. C. Manh et al., “A facile synthesis, characterization, and photocatalytic activity of magnesium ferrite nanoparticles via the solution combustion method,” Journal of Chemistry, vol. 2019, Article ID 3428681, 8 pages, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. S. I. Hussein, A. S. Elkady, M. M. Rashad, A. G. Mostafa, and R. M. Megahid, “Structural and magnetic properties of magnesium ferrite nanoparticles prepared via EDTA-based sol–gel reaction,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, vol. 379, pp. 9–15, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. A. Ivanets, M. Roshchina, V. Srivastava et al., “Effect of metal ions adsorption on the efficiency of methylene blue degradation onto MgFe2O4 as Fenton-like catalysts,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, vol. 571, pp. 17–26, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. D. Hermosilla, C. Han, M. N. Nadagouda et al., “Environmentally friendly synthesized and magnetically recoverable designed ferrite photo-catalysts for wastewater treatment applications,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 381, article 121200, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. Rani, Rachna, and U. Shanker, “Efficient photocatalytic degradation of Bisphenol A by metal ferrites nanoparticles under sunlight,” Environmental Technology & Innovation, vol. 19, article 100792, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. X. Han, H. Zhang, T. Chen, M. Zhang, and M. Guo, “Facile synthesis of metal-doped magnesium ferrite from saprolite laterite as an effective heterogeneous Fenton-like catalyst,” Journal of Molecular Liquids, vol. 272, pp. 43–52, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. S. Singh and S. Singhal, “Transition metal doped cobalt ferrite nanoparticles: efficient photocatalyst for photodegradation of textile dye,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 14, Part 2, pp. 453–460, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. ational Center for Biotechnology Information, “PubChem Database. Ibuprofen, CID = 3672,” April 2020, View at: Google Scholar
  22. M. Sillanpää, M. C. Ncibi, and A. Matilainen, “Advanced oxidation processes for the removal of natural organic matter from drinking water sources: a comprehensive review,” Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 208, pp. 56–76, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. S. Adityosulindro, C. Julcour, and L. Barthe, “Heterogeneous Fenton oxidation using Fe-ZSM5 catalyst for removal of ibuprofen in wastewater,” Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 5920–5928, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. K. V. Kumar, K. Porkodi, and F. Rocha, “Langmuir–Hinshelwood kinetics – a theoretical study,” Catalysis Communications, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 82–84, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. H. N. Tran, S.-J. You, A. Hosseini-Bandegharaei, and H.-P. Chao, “Mistakes and inconsistencies regarding adsorption of contaminants from aqueous solutions: a critical review,” Water Research, vol. 120, pp. 88–116, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. S. K. Durrani, S. Naz, M. Mehmood, M. Nadeem, and M. Siddique, “Structural, impedance and Mössbauer studies of magnesium ferrite synthesized via sol–gel auto-combustion process,” Journal of Saudi Chemical Society, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 899–910, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. M. Thommes, K. Kaneko, A. V. Neimark et al., “Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report),” Pure and Applied Chemistry, vol. 87, no. 9-10, pp. 1051–1069, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. J. De Laat and H. Gallard, “Catalytic decomposition of hydrogen peroxide by Fe(III) in homogeneous aqueous solution: mechanism and kinetic modeling,” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 33, no. 16, pp. 2726–2732, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. A. Cihanoğlu, G. Gündüz, and M. Dükkancı, “Degradation of acetic acid by heterogeneous Fenton-like oxidation over iron-containing ZSM-5 zeolites,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 165, pp. 687–699, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. M. Aleksić, H. Kušić, N. Koprivanac, D. Leszczynska, and A. L. Božić, “Heterogeneous Fenton type processes for the degradation of organic dye pollutant in water – the application of zeolite assisted AOPs,” Desalination, vol. 257, no. 1-3, pp. 22–29, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. M. Pera-Titus, V. Garcı́a-Molina, M. A. Baños, J. Giménez, and S. Esplugas, “Degradation of chlorophenols by means of advanced oxidation processes: a general review,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 219–256, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. M. Muruganandham, R. P. S. Suri, S. Jafari et al., “Recent developments in homogeneous advanced oxidation processes for water and wastewater treatment,” International Journal of Photoenergy, vol. 2014, Article ID 821674, 21 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. M. Muruganandham, R. P. S. Suri, M. Sillanpää et al., “Recent developments in heterogeneous catalyzed environmental remediation processes,” Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 1898–1910, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. S. R. Pouran, A. R. A. Aziz, and W. M. A. W. Daud, “Review on the main advances in photo-Fenton oxidation system for recalcitrant wastewaters,” Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, vol. 21, pp. 53–69, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. R. Yin, J. Sun, Y. Xiang, and C. Shang, “Recycling and reuse of rusted iron particles containing core-shell Fe-FeOOH for ibuprofen removal: adsorption and persulfate-based advanced oxidation,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 178, pp. 441–448, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. N. Farhadi, T. Tabatabaie, B. Ramavandi, and F. Amiri, “Optimization and characterization of zeolite-titanate for ibuprofen elimination by sonication/hydrogen peroxide/ultraviolet activity,” Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, vol. 67, article 105122, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. F. Peng, R. Yin, Y. Liao et al., “Kinetics and mechanisms of enhanced degradation of ibuprofen by piezo-catalytic activation of persulfate,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 392, article 123818, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. M. E. Malefane, U. Feleni, P. J. Mafa, and A. T. Kuvarega, “Fabrication of direct Z-scheme Co3O4/BiOI for ibuprofen and trimethoprim degradation under visible light irradiation,” Applied Surface Science, vol. 514, article 145940, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. M. Jiménez-Salcedo, M. Monge, and M. T. Tena, “Photocatalytic degradation of ibuprofen in water using TiO2/UV and g-C3N4/visible light: study of intermediate degradation products by liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry,” Chemosphere, vol. 215, pp. 605–618, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. J.-C. E. Yang, B. Yuan, H.-J. Cui, S. Wang, and M.-L. Fu, “Modulating oxone-MnOx/silica catalytic systems towards ibuprofen degradation: insights into system effects, reaction kinetics and mechanisms,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 205, pp. 327–339, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. W. Cao, Y. Yuan, C. Yang, S. Wu, and J. Cheng, “In-situ fabrication of g-C3N4/MIL-68(In)-NH2 heterojunction composites with enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity for degradation of ibuprofen,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 391, p. 123608, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2020 Andrei Ivanets et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.