The Synchronization of Electron Enricher and Electron Extractor as Ternary Composite Photoanode for Enhancement of DSSC Performance

Sangkhun, Weradesh; Wanwong, Sompit; Wongyao, Nutthapon; Butburee, Teera; Kumnorkaew, Pisist; Wootthikanokkhan, Jatuphorn

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8712407

Journal of Nanomaterials

On this page

Abstract Introduction Results and Discussion Conclusions Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments Supplementary Materials References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 | Article ID 8712407 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8712407

The Synchronization of Electron Enricher and Electron Extractor as Ternary Composite Photoanode for Enhancement of DSSC Performance

Weradesh Sangkhun,¹Sompit Wanwong,^1,2Nutthapon Wongyao,³Teera Butburee,⁴Pisist Kumnorkaew,⁴and Jatuphorn Wootthikanokkhan^1,2

Guest Editor: Abdelrahamn Zkria

Received02 Jan 2020

Accepted19 Feb 2020

Published16 Mar 2020

Abstract

This work developed a novel ternary composite photoanode of dye-sensitized solar cell (DSSC) composed of (i) N-, S-doped titanium dioxide with exposed {001} facet (N-, S-TiO_2{001}), (ii) N-, S-doped reduced graphene oxide (N-, S-rGO), and (iii) commercial titanium dioxide (P25). The DSSC device fabricated with the ternary composite photoanode showed the greatest of power conversion efficiency (8.62%) compared to the device fabricated with P25 photoanode (3.20%). This enhancement was attributed to the synergistic effect of the N-, S-TiO_2{001} and the N-, S-rGO, which act as an electron enricher and an electron extractor, respectively.

1. Introduction

Dye-sensitized solar cell (DSSC) has gained a considerable attention as a potential solar device. The performance of the DSSC could be improved by several strategies, including the development of more efficient dye sensitizers [1, 2] electrolyte systems [3], counter electrodes [4, 5], and photoanodes [6, 7]. Among these, the photoanode is an integral part determining the overall efficiency of DSSC because it has strong influence on dye adsorption ability and charge transport properties [8, 9]. However, the commonly used photoanode material such as titanium dioxide P25 still has some drawbacks, including large bandgap energy (BGE) and low electron (e⁻) mobility, resulting in low power conversion efficiency (PCE) of devices [10]. In this regard, an inclusion of TiO₂ with exposed {001} facet (TiO_2{001}) as a 2D material into the photoanode systems was reported that can significantly enhance charge transport [11, 12]. In addition, the electronic properties of TiO_2{001} can be easily tuned by doping with nonmetallic atoms to improve light harvesting efficiency [13, 14]. However, this might also lead to the formation of deep trap state, which induces the charge recombination [15]. To cope up with this problem, the use of nonmetallic atom-doped reduced graphene oxide (rGO) is of our interest because of its high conductivity to quickly extract the photoexcited e⁻ before the recombination could take place [16–18].

In this work, we introduce an alternative approach to enhance DSSC performance using a novel ternary composite photoanode based on N-, S-doped TiO_2{001}, N-, S-doped rGO, and P25. First, the N-, S-doped TiO_2{001} and N-, S-doped rGO were synthesized and optimized. The effect of mixing ratios between N-, S-doped TiO_2{001} and/or N-, S-doped rGO in P25 on performance of the DSSC was also investigated. The mechanism behind a synergistic effect of the ternary composite photoanode was elucidated by using ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) spectroscopy, photoluminescence spectroscopy (PL), external quantum efficiency (EQE), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS).

2. Results and Discussion

TiO_2{001} was synthesized by hydrothermal technique. More details can be found in Supplementary Information (SI) S1.1 and S1.2. The morphology of various TiO_2{001} was observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM). It was found that when HF concentration was increased, the thickness of TiO_2{001} particles was decreased, while the lateral size of particles increased (Figures 1(a)−1(c)). This result is in agreement with our recent report [19]. In addition, the platelet TiO_2{001} particles were transformed to a hierarchical sheet-like structure and tended to aggregate, forming stacked hierarchical particles when HF/Ti ratio was reached to 3 and 4, respectively (Figures 1(c) and 1(d)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

(h)

Figure 1(e) showed that the X-ray diffraction patterns of all TiO_2{001} samples were perfectly indexed as anatase (JCPDS card no. 21-1272). Furthermore, as shown in Figure 1(g), the percentage of {001} facet (%S) calculated by Raman spectra in Figure S2 [20] increased with the increment of HF/Ti ratio from 1 to 3 (42.6% to 97.2%). However, %S of TiO_2{001}-4F dropped to 76.3%. This may be due to the stacking phenomenon of TiO_2{001} sheet and the collapse of TiO_2{001} particles at the side edges (Figure 1(d)). In addition, it was found that the dye loading capacity of TiO_2{001} decreased with an increase of %S (Figure 1(g)). This result is in contrast to the conventional understanding that the increase of %S can lead to the higher dye absorption capacity [21]. In our work, grain size seems to be more important factor for increasing dye absorption ability. Thus, 20 wt.% of TiO_2{001} was selected to mix in P25 to further increase dye loading capacity of material.

The photovoltaic performance of DSSCs assembled with various TiO_2{001} as a photoanode was also investigated. The cell configuration of DSSC and its fabrication method are described in Figures S1 and S1.4, respectively. The curves of DSSCs are shown in Figure 2. It was found that the photoanode containing TiO_2{001}-2F showed the most promising short-circuit current density (, 8.57 mA/cm²), which results in an enhancement of PCE (4.63%), compared to that of pure P25 (, 6.40 mA/cm² and PCE, 3.20%). The derived parameters, relating to photovoltaic performance of various DSSCs, were summarized in Table 1.

The enhancement of PCE was further supported by the results from photoluminescence spectroscopy (PL). The PL spectra (Figure 3(a)) of all TiO_2{001} samples show similar of broad emission peaks in visible light region. Since the red emission band (~600−650 nm), which is related to Ti³⁺ species, was absent, the emission peaks are therefore associated with the defect states generated by oxygen vacancies, creating the shallow trap and deep trap state [22, 23]. The amount of shallow trap and deep trap states plays a significant role in determining e⁻ mobility of photoanode materials [24]. The shallow trap states, locating near conduction band edge (CB) of TiO_2{001}, can effectively capture photoexcited e⁻ via the hopping mechanism. This can increase the amount of effective e⁻ and eventually retard charge recombination. In contrast, the deep trap states located at deeper energy can permanently trap the photoexcited e⁻, promoting the e⁻−h⁺ recombination. The PL spectra were deconvoluted at 460 nm and 510− 555 nm, corresponding to a shallow trap (blue emission) and a deep trap state (green emission), respectively [25] (SI Figure S3). Interestingly, the TiO_2{001}-2F has the highest areal emission ratio () of 1.13, as shown in Figure 3(b). This result is also consistent with an increase of value. In this study, it was believed that the presence of shallow trap sites may be caused by the unsaturated bonds (5c−Ti and 2c−O) [26]. However, the TiO_2{001}-3F, which has the highest %S value (97.24%), provided a lower and fill factor (FF). This could be due to high F⁻ concentration, which was incorporated into TiO₂ lattice, forming −Ti−F−Ti− bonds, leading to the formation of defect at deep in TiO_2{001} crystal [27].

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 3

(a) PL spectra and (b) the plot of areal emission ratio () of various TiO_2{001}. (c) Nyquist plots and (d) Bode phase plots of DSSCs fabricated by using various TiO_2{001} as a photoanode. The inset in (c) is the equivalent circuit of DSSC cell configuration, where , , and refer to series resistance, charge transfer resistance at Pt counter electrode, and charge recombination resistance at TiO₂/electrolyte interface, respectively. The parameters CPE1/CPE2 and denote constant phase elements and Warburg impedance, respectively.

The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was conducted to further gain insight into the charge transport dynamics of DSSCs fabricated with various TiO_2{001}. Because of low charge transfer resistance at the Pt electrode () (SI Figure S4), the Nyquist plots (Figure 3(c)) show only the 2^nd semicircle, which represents charge recombination resistance between photoanode and electrolyte interface () [28]. The radius of the semicircle decreased with respect to the increase of HF content, resulting in a higher charge recombination rate. Moreover, the series resistances () of DSSCs [29] were increased with an increased HF concentration. This directly corresponds to the increased deep trap state in TiO_2{001} [30]. Interestingly, the DSSC fabricated by using TiO_2{001}-2F as a photoanode has the higher charge recombination resistance (200.51 Ω) and lower series resistance (15.62 Ω) compared to the other samples. Furthermore, Bode plots (Figure 3(d)) and the parameters relating to the impedance properties (Table 2) suggest that the TiO_2{001}-2F can significantly enhance the electron lifetime (, 1.599 ms) and improve the electron transport time (, 0.125 ms). Consequently, the charge collection efficiency (, 92.77%) of DSSC was significantly increased [31–33]. Based on the above results, the TiO_2{001}-2F was selected to further dope with nonmetallic atoms to enhance the light harvesting efficiency of material.

The doping of TiO_2{001}-2F with N and S atoms (designated as N-, S-TiO_2{001}-2F) was carried out to enhance light harvesting efficiency of TiO_2{001} [34] (the method was described in S1.2). From SEM image (Figure 1(h)), the particle size of N-, S-TiO_2{001}-2F does not change compared to TiO_2{001}-2F. The XRD result (Figure 1(e)) showed that the N-, S-TiO_2{001}-2F was perfectly indexed to anatase phase and the full width at half maximum (FWHM) at (101) was increased compared to the undoped sample (Figure 1(f)). This suggests that the dopants can reduce the grain size of the TiO_2{001} [34], resulting an increase of dye loading capacity (blank red circle in Figure 1(g)). Furthermore, the successful incorporation of N and S atoms in TiO_2{001} lattice was also confirmed by the XPS spectra, as shown in Figures S5a and S5b. However, we found that the %S of N-, S-TiO_2{001}-2F decreased (blank black square in Figure 1(g)). This implies that the incorporation of N and S atoms in TiO_2{001} lattice might affect the vibrational signal of O−Ti−O ( and bands), which was corresponded to the blue shifted and broader of band in Raman spectrum of N-, S-TiO_2{001}-2F (SI Figure S2, inset). This suggests that the local lattice was changed due to the oxygen vacancies, forming by the incorporation of nonmetallic atoms [35].

The N-, S-doped reduced graphene oxide (rGO) was used to improve electron collection efficiency of DSSC because of its high electrical conductivity [36]. The graphene oxide (GO) used as precursor of rGO was successfully prepared by using modified Hummer’s method under low temperature assisted with preexfoliation condition (rGO-(PreEx/LT)). The N-, S-doped rGO (N-, S-rGO-(PreEx/LT)) was then synthesized by the wet chemical reduction method. More details about their synthesis were described in SI S1.3.

Figure 4(a) illustrates the schematic of the synthesized GOs together with the resulting morphologies of the materials characterized by SEM technique. It was found that GO-(PreEx/LT) (Figure 4(d)) has smooth surface, thin sheet, and large lateral size. In addition, from the XRD pattern (Figure 4(f)), the GO-(PreEx/LT) has larger -spacing along (001) direction (, 8.67 Å), larger average crystallite size (, 9.63 nm), larger average diameter of stacking layers (, ~24 nm), and higher number of layer of graphene sheets (, 12 layers) compared to other GOs [37] (see Table S2 for more calculated data). Moreover, to observe the quality of GOs, the structural changes, defects, and disorders of the GO samples were further investigated by Raman spectroscopy [38]. As shown in Figure 4(g), the 1^st-order scattering region [39] of various GOs exhibits band (1354−1364 cm^-1) and band (1593−1603 cm^-1), which represent the disordered of graphitic structure and in-plane sp² C=C stretching mode, respectively. The intensity ratio of of GO-(PreEx/LT) (0.84) is lower than that of GO-(HT) (0.90), indicating the larger of sp² graphitic domain with less defects. These indicate that GO-(PreEx/LT) provides better quality of exfoliated graphene sheet.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

The successful formation of oxidized GO can be confirmed by FTIR spectra (Figure 5(a)). Basically, four peaks of (O–H) (~3400 cm^-1), (C=O) (1719− 1731 cm^-1), C=C of unoxidized sp² graphitic domain (1564−1620 cm^-1), and C–O (949–1405 cm^-1) vibration are presented in all GO samples [40]. The FTIR data of GO products were fit to perform quantitative analysis of oxygen-containing groups, as shown in Equation S2 [41]. It was found that the overall oxygen-related bond (ORB) of GO-(PreEx/LT) (82.5%) is greater than those of GO-(LT) (77.4%) and GO-(HT) (61.3%). This reveals that the GO synthesized by low temperature assisted with pre-exfoliation process gave higher oxidation degree. The peak position and calculated peak area of each functional groups of various GOs was summarized in Table S3.

(a)

(b)

Furthermore, UV-visible absorption spectra (UV-vis), as shown in Figure 5(b), present the peaks at 238−245 nm, corresponding to the ⟶ electronic transitions of aromatic conjugated system of sp² domain (C=C) bonds, while the weak shoulders at around 300−311 nm assigned to the ⟶ transitions present the oxygen containing groups, locating at the edge and basal plane of graphene sheet [42, 43]. From these results, the relative normalized intensity of absorption peak at ⟶ band of GO-(PreEx/LT) is relatively high and the position of ⟶ band of GO-(PreEx/LT) (238 nm) is blue shifted as compared to GO-(LT) (inset in Figure 5(b)). This means that the GO-(PreEx/LT) has high-oxidation degree, which is consistent with FTIR result [44]. Thus, GO-(PreEx/LT) was considered to be a suitable precursor for N-, S-codoped rGO.

The GO-(PreEx/LT) was further used to prepare N-, S-doped reduced graphene oxide (N-, S-rGO-(PreEx/LT)) to improve electrical conductivity. The morphology of N-, S-rGO-(PreEx/LT) is shown in Figure 4(e). The presence of many wrinkled, rippled, and scrolled graphene sheets were observed. Moreover, the XRD pattern of N-, S-rGO-(PreEx/LT) (Figure 4(f)) clearly shows a broad diffraction peaks at ~24°, corresponding to the (002) diffraction plane of rGO (JCPDS Card No.75−1621), which shifted to higher diffraction angle compared with (001) diffraction angle of GO-(PreEx/LT). This can be confirmed that the GO was successfully reduced, resulting in lower d-spacing.

To assure the successful reduction, changes in chemical structure of N-, S-rGO-(PreEx/LT) after reduction process were monitored by using FTIR. The absence of oxygen-containing groups in FTIR spectra (Figure 5(a)) and the red shifted of ⟶ band referred to aromatic conjugated system of C=C in UV-vis spectra (Figure 5(b)) were noted. These indicate that the electronic conjugation within graphene sheet (sp²) is restored after doping and reduction [45]. In addition, the quality of synthesized N-, S-rGO-(PreEx/LT) was examined by using Raman spectroscopy (Figure 4(g)). values of the N-, S-rGO-(PreEx/LT) (0.98) was greater than that of GO-(PreEx/LT) (0.84), indicating that N and S atoms can cause some defects or disorders in the graphene structure.

In this part, the N-, S-TiO_2{001}-2F and N-, S-rGO-(PreEx/LT) with different ratios in P25 were utilized as a composite photoanode. The curves, as seen in Figures S7a and S7b, showed the significant enhancement in the up to 13.10 mA/cm² (6.55% PCE), and 13.77 mA/cm² (6.09% PCE) can be found in two devices containing 0.6 wt.% of N-, S-TiO_2{001}-2F in P25 and 0.4 wt.% of N-, S-rGO-(PreEx/LT) in P25, respectively (the photovoltaic parameters of DSSCs fabricated by various photoanodes can be found in Table S4). From these optimum contents, weight ratio between N-, S-TiO_2{001}-2F and N-, S-rGO-(PreEx/LT) was fixed at 3 : 2 and then this component was mixed with P25 in various contents to make the ternary composite photoanode (Figure 6(a)).

(a)

(b)

Interestingly, as seen in Figure S7c, 1.0 wt.% of the mixture of N-, S-TiO_2{001}-2F and N-, S-rGO-(PreEx/LT) (3 : 2 by wt.) in P25 based ternary composite photoanode boosted the PCE up to 8.62%, which was about 2.7 times enhancement compared to the photoanode made of pure P25 (3.20%). In addition, the large improvement of up to 19.47 mA/cm², which was around 3 times enhancement compared to P25 (6.40 mA/cm²) was noticed. This suggests the synergistic cooperation of both N-, S-rGO-(PreEx/LT) and N-, S-TiO_2{001}-2F in P25. The J-V results and photovoltaic parameters of DSSCs fabricated by various photoanodes were summarized in Figure 6(b) and Table 3, respectively.

The UV-vis absorption spectra should be considered to investigate the enhancement of PCE. As shown in Figure 7(a), the Kubelka-Munk plot of N-, S-TiO_2{001}-2F exhibited a remarkable red shift (2.3 eV) compared to that of TiO_2{001}-2F (3.05 eV). This suggests that N-, S-TiO_2{001}-2F could harvest more proportion of sunlight compared to that of undoped sample, resulting in an enhanced density of photoexcited e⁻ in DSSC cell as clearly indicated by the increased values from 8.57 mA/cm² (TiO_2{001}-2F) to 13.10 mA/cm². Furthermore, the electrochemical impedance spectra (EIS) of DSSC fabricated with various composite photoanodes were recorded. The Nyquist and Bode phase plots are illustrated in Figures 7(b) and 7(c), respectively, and the calculated impedance parameters are summarized in Table 4. The results show that of DSSC was significantly reduced by applying the N-, S-rGO-(PreEx/LT) as photoanode (). This indicates that the N-, S-rGO-(PreEx/LT) can effectively improve electrical conductivity of DSSC cell, resulting in a lower (335.60Ω), a faster e⁻ transport time () (0.12 ms), and a higher e⁻ lifetime () (2.61 ms) as compared to the other photoanodes.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Surprisingly, for ternary composite photoanodes, the lowest (12.34 Ω) and the highest (520.95 Ω) values were achieved (Table 4). Moreover, the frequency at maximum in Bode phase plot of DSSC fabricated by using the ternary composite photoanode was shifted to the lower frequency region. Therefore, from these results, the ternary composite photoanode not only shows faster e⁻ transport time () but also exhibited longer e⁻ lifetime () as compared to all samples, resulting in the highest charge collection efficiency () (97.69%).

The enhanced external quantum efficiency (EQE) was observed in N-, S-TiO_2{001}-2F/P25, N-, S-rGO-(PreEx/LT)/P25, and ternary composite photoanode. The EQE (Figure 7(d)) of DSSC fabricated by P25 photoanode has a maximum value of 32.5% and 27.75% at wavelengths 400 nm and 520 nm, respectively. The EQE increase along the whole range of its adsorbed wavelength after 0.6 wt.% of N-, S-TiO_2{001}-2F/P25 was applied. This evidence clearly suggests that the N-, S-TiO_2{001}-2F acts as e⁻ enricher, leading to an increase of value. In addition, when 0.4 wt.% of N-, S-rGO-(PreEx/LT) in P25 was introduced into the DSSC, the EQE was also enhanced. This can be described to the improvement of charges transport process through the enhancement of e⁻ extraction and e⁻ mobility. Interestingly, EQE was enormously enhanced after addition of ternary composite photoanode (raised to 63%). This result clearly confirms the synergistic effect between e⁻ enricher (N-, S-TiO_2{001}-2F) and e⁻ extractor (N-, S-rGO-(PreEx/LT)). The derived from the integration of EQE data were 6.32, 12.99, 13.63, and 19.31 mA/cm² for P25, 0.60 wt.% N-, S-TiO_2{001}-2F/P25, 0.40 wt.% N-, S-rGO-(PreEx/LT)/P25, and ternary composite photoanode, respectively. These are closed to derived by photovoltaic results.

Finally, the proposed charges transfer mechanism of DSSC fabricated using ternary composite photoanode could be described in terms of cascade energy diagram as shown in Figure 8. When dye molecule absorbs the light, the e⁻ is excited (1) and transferred to the CB of P25 (2). The e⁻ at this state can move to CB of N-, S-TiO_2{001}-2F (3) via e⁻ hopping mechanism, and it can be further extracted by N-, S-rGO-(PreEx-LT), which acts as e⁻ extractor, through the external circuit performing work (4). Moreover, the N-, S-TiO_2{001}-2F as the e⁻ enricher can be easily excited by visible light (5) (pink arrow in the first circle), resulting in high density of photoexcited e⁻. However, photoexcited e⁻ might be deactivated and recombined (red arrow in all circles). Thus, the combination of e⁻ extractor can help to quickly extract the photoexcited e⁻ before the recombination could take place.

3. Conclusions

Nitrogen-sulfur-doped TiO₂ with exposed {001} facet (N-, S-TiO_2{001}-2F) and nitrogen-sulfur-doped reduced graphene oxide (N-, S-rGO-(PreEx/LT)) were successfully synthesized via hydrothermal and modified Hummer’s method followed by the wet chemical reduction process, respectively. The photovoltaic device containing ternary composite photoanode, made from a combination of 1.0 wt.% of N-, S-TiO_2{001}-2F/N-, S-rGO-(PreEx/LT) (3 : 2 by wt.) and P25, showed the highest power conversion efficiency (PCE) value of 8.62%, which is 2.7 times greater than that of device employing P25 as the photoanode (3.20%). The above effect was ascribed to the large enhancement of value of the former system (19.47 mA/cm²) which is about 3.0 times higher than that of the latter (6.40 mA/cm²). Overall, this study demonstrated the synergistic effect between e⁻ enricher (N-, S-TiO_2{001}-2F) and e⁻ extractor (N-, S-rGO-(PreEx/LT)), which suppressed the charge recombination and improved the PCE value of the solar cell.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported by the Nanotechnology Center (NANOTEC), NSTDA, and Ministry of Science and Technology, Thailand, through its program of Center of Excellence Network. The financial support provided by King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi is through the “KMUTT 55th Anniversary Commemorative Fund” and “the Petchra Pra Jom Klao Doctoral Scholarship.” Financial support from NANOTEC (grant number P1652084) is also appreciated.

Supplementary Materials

Details on the materials, grade, and supplier (S1.1), the procedure for synthesis TiO_2{001} facet and its doping with nonmetallic atoms (N and S) (S1.2), the synthesis of GO with various conditions (Table S1) and its doping with nonmetallic atoms (N and S) (S1.3), the DSSC cell architecture and its fabrication method (S1.4), descriptions of the characterization techniques (S1.5), Raman spectra of various TiO_2{001} and percentage of {001} facet calculation (Figure S2), the example of deconvoluted PL spectrum (TiO_2{001}-2F) (Figure S3), the example of Nyquist plot of DSSC fabricated by using pure P25 as photoanode (Figure S4), XPS spectra of N-, S-TiO_2{001}-2F and N-, S-rGO-(PreEx/LT) (Figures S5 and S6, respectively), the summary of parameters obtained from XRD data of various GOs (Table S2), the overall oxygen related bonds (ORB) of various GOs (Table S3), the curves (Figure S7), and the parameters relating the photovoltaic testing of various DSSCs that applied different types of photoanodes (Table S4). (Supplementary Materials)

References

K. Kakiage, Y. Aoyama, T. Yano, K. Oya, J. Fujisawa, and M. Hanaya, “Highly-efficient dye-sensitized solar cells with collaborative sensitization by silyl-anchor and carboxy-anchor dyes,” Chemical Communications, vol. 51, no. 88, pp. 15894–15897, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Wanwong, W. Sangkhun, and J. Wootthikanokkhan, “The effect of co-sensitization methods between N719 and boron dipyrromethene triads on dye-sensitized solar cell performance,” RSC Advances, vol. 8, no. 17, pp. 9202–9210, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Zhang, Y. Wu, H. W. Bahng et al., “Comprehensive control of voltage loss enables 11.7% efficient solid-state dye-sensitized solar cells,” Energy & Environmental Science, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 1779–1787, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Gnanasekar, P. Kollu, S. K. Jeong, and A. N. Grace, “Pt-free, low-cost and efficient counter electrode with carbon wrapped VO₂(M) nanofiber for dye-sensitized solar cells,” Scientific Reports, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 5177, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Tang, H. Yu, W. Huang et al., “Three-dimensional graphene networks and RGO-based counter electrode for DSSCs,” RSC Advances, vol. 9, no. 28, pp. 15678–15685, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. S. Shin, J. H. Suk, B. J. Kang et al., “Energy-level engineering of the electron transporting layer for improving open-circuit voltage in dye and perovskite-based solar cells,” Energy & Environmental Science, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 958–964, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P.-A. Cormier, J. Dervaux, N. Szuwarski et al., “Single Crystalline-like and nanostructured TiO2Photoanodes for dye sensitized solar cells synthesized by reactive magnetron sputtering at glancing angle,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 122, no. 36, pp. 20661–20668, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. So, I. Hwang, J. E. Yoo et al., “Inducing a Nanotwinned grain structure within the TiO2Nanotubes provides enhanced electron transport and DSSC efficiencies >10%,” Advanced Energy Materials, vol. 8, no. 33, p. 1800981, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Fu, Y. Duan, W. Lu et al., “Realization of ultra-long columnar single crystals in TiO2nanotube arrays as fast electron transport channels for high efficiency dye-sensitized solar cells,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 7, no. 18, pp. 11520–11529, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Jiang, X. Zhang, and J. You, “SnO₂: a wonderful electron transport layer for perovskite solar cells,” Small, vol. 14, no. 31, p. 1801154, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Zhang, F. Wei, Q. Wu, L. Piao, M. Liu, and Z. Jin, “Formation and evolution of the High-Surface-Energy facets of anatase TiO₂,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 119, no. 11, pp. 6094–6100, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Liu, G. Dong, S. Li, G. Lu, and Y. Bi, “Direct observation of charge separation on anatase TiO₂ crystals with selectively etched {001} facets,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 138, no. 9, pp. 2917–2920, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Sun, P. Gao, Y. Yang, P. Yang, Y. Chen, and Y. Wang, “N-doped TiO₂ nanobelts with coexposed (001) and (101) facets and their highly efficient visible-light-driven photocatalytic hydrogen production,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 8, no. 28, pp. 18126–18131, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Yan, Z. Xing, Y. Cao et al., “In-situ C-N-S-tridoped single crystal black TiO₂ nanosheets with exposed {001} facets as efficient visible-light-driven photocatalysts,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 219, pp. 572–579, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. M. Rockafellow, L. K. Stewart, and W. S. Jenks, “Is sulfur-doped TiO₂ an effective visible light photocatalyst for remediation?” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 91, no. 1-2, pp. 554–562, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Tian, J. Li, G. Zhu et al., “Facile synthesis of highly conductive sulfur doped reduced graphene oxide sheets,” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 1125–1130, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Konios, G. Kakavelakis, C. Petridis, K. Savva, E. Stratakis, and E. Kymakis, “Highly efficient organic photovoltaic devices utilizing work-function tuned graphene oxide derivatives as the anode and cathode charge extraction layers,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 1612–1623, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
U. Kanta, V. Thongpool, W. Sangkhun, N. Wongyao, and J. Wootthikanokkhan, “Preparations, characterizations, and a comparative study on photovoltaic performance of two different types of graphene/TiO₂ nanocomposites photoelectrodes,” Journal of Nanomaterials, vol. 2017, Article ID 2758294, 13 pages, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Butburee, P. Kotchasarn, P. Hirunsit et al., “New understanding of crystal control and facet selectivity of titanium dioxide ruling photocatalytic performance,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 7, no. 14, pp. 8156–8166, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Tian, Y. Zhang, J. Zhang, and C. Pan, “Raman spectroscopy: a new approach to measure the percentage of anatase TiO2Exposed (001) facets,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 116, no. 13, pp. 7515–7519, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J.-D. Peng, P. C. Shih, H. H. Lin et al., “TiO₂ nanosheets with highly exposed (001)-facets for enhanced photovoltaic performance of dye-sensitized solar cells,” Nano Energy, vol. 10, pp. 212–221, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K.-S. Jeon, S.-D. Oh, Y. D. Suh, H. Yoshikawa, H. Masuhara, and M. Yoon, “Blinking photoluminescence properties of single TiO₂ nanodiscs: interfacial electron transfer dynamics,” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 534–542, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Jin, B. Liu, Z. Lei, and J. Sun, “Structure and photoluminescence of the TiO₂ films grown by atomic layer deposition using tetrakis-dimethylamino titanium and ozone,” Nanoscale Research Letters, vol. 10, no. 1, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Wang, D. Wu, L.-M. Fu, X.-C. Ai, D. Xu, and J.-P. Zhang, “Density of state determination of two types of intra-gap traps in dye-sensitized solar cells and its influence on device performance,” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, vol. 16, no. 23, pp. 11626–11632, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Choudhury, M. Dey, and A. Choudhury, “Shallow and deep trap emission and luminescence quenching of TiO₂ nanoparticles on Cu doping,” Applied Nanoscience, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 499–506, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y.-K. Peng, B. Keeling, Y. Li et al., “Unravelling the key role of surface features behind facet-dependent photocatalysis of anatase TiO₂,” Chemical Communications, vol. 55, no. 30, pp. 4415–4418, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Czoska, S. Livraghi, M. Chiesa et al., “The nature of defects in fluorine doped TiO₂,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 112, no. 24, pp. 8951–8956, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Sarker, A. J. S. Ahammad, H. W. Seo, and D. M. Kim, “Electrochemical Impedance Spectra of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells: Fundamentals and Spreadsheet Calculation,” International Journal of Photoenergy, vol. 2014, Article ID 851705, 17 pages, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Tao, Z. Huo, Y. Ding et al., “High-efficiency and stable quasi-solid-state dye-sensitized solar cell based on low molecular mass organogelator electrolyte,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 2344–2352, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Roose, S. Pathak, and U. Steiner, “Doping of TiO₂ for sensitized solar cells,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 44, no. 22, pp. 8326–8349, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Bisquert, F. Fabregat-Santiago, I. Mora-Seró, G. Garcia-Belmonte, and S. Giménez, “Electron lifetime in Dye-Sensitized solar cells: theory and interpretation of measurements,” Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 113, no. 40, pp. 17278–17290, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Nissfolk, K. Fredin, A. Hagfeldt, and G. Boschloo, “Recombination and transport processes in dye-sensitized solar cells investigated under working conditions,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry. B, vol. 110, no. 36, pp. 17715–17718, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. G. Kim, M. J. Ju, I. T. Choi et al., “Nb-doped TiO₂ nanoparticles for organic dye-sensitized solar cells,” RSC Advances, vol. 3, no. 37, pp. 16380–16386, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Xiang, J. Yu, and M. Jaroniec, “Nitrogen and sulfur co-doped TiO₂ nanosheets with exposed {001} facets: synthesis, characterization and visible-light photocatalytic activity,” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 4853–4861, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Guo, T. Guo, J. Chen et al., “Synthesis of C–N–S co-doped TiO2mischcrystal with an isobandgap characteristic and its photocatalytic activity under visible light,” Catalysis Science & Technology, vol. 8, no. 16, pp. 4108–4121, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Han, L. Chen, W. Song et al., “Synthesis of nitrogen and sulfur co-doped reduced graphene oxide as efficient metal-free cocatalyst for the photo-activity enhancement of CdS,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, vol. 236, pp. 212–221, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Stobinski, B. Lesiak, A. Malolepszy et al., “Graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide studied by the XRD, TEM and electron spectroscopy methods,” Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena, vol. 195, pp. 145–154, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Zhu, S. Guo, Y. Fang, and S. Dong, “Reducing sugar: new functional molecules for the green synthesis of graphene nanosheets,” ACS Nano, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 2429–2437, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. C. Ferrari and D. M. Basko, “Raman spectroscopy as a versatile tool for studying the properties of graphene,” Nature Nanotechnology, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 235–246, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Ţucureanu, A. Matei, and A. M. Avram, “FTIR spectroscopy for carbon family study,” Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 502–520, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Guerrero-Contreras and F. Caballero-Briones, “Graphene oxide powders with different oxidation degree, prepared by synthesis variations of the Hummers method,” Materials Chemistry and Physics, vol. 153, pp. 209–220, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Lai, S. Zhu, X. Luo, M. Zou, and S. Huang, “Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy of graphene oxides,” AIP Advances, vol. 2, no. 3, p. 032146, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. K. Cushing, W. Ding, G. Chen et al., “Excitation wavelength dependent fluorescence of graphene oxide controlled by strain,” Nanoscale, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 2240–2245, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zhou, Q. Bao, L. A. L. Tang, Y. Zhong, and K. P. Loh, “Hydrothermal dehydration for the ‘green’ reduction of exfoliated graphene oxide to graphene and demonstration of tunable optical limiting properties,” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 21, no. 13, pp. 2950–2956, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. López and R. Gómez, “Band-gap energy estimation from diffuse reflectance measurements on sol–gel and commercial TiO2: a comparative study,” Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2020 Weradesh Sangkhun et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

607

Downloads

870

Citations