Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism

Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism / 2015 / Article

Clinical Study | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 690954 |

Imane El Menchawy, Asmaa El Hamdouchi, Khalid El Kari, Naima Saeid, Fatima Ezzahra Zahrou, Nada Benajiba, Imane El Harchaoui, Mohamed El Mzibri, Noureddine El Haloui, Hassan Aguenaou, "Efficacy of Multiple Micronutrients Fortified Milk Consumption on Iron Nutritional Status in Moroccan Schoolchildren", Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism, vol. 2015, Article ID 690954, 8 pages, 2015.

Efficacy of Multiple Micronutrients Fortified Milk Consumption on Iron Nutritional Status in Moroccan Schoolchildren

Academic Editor: Christel Lamberg-Allardt
Received27 May 2015
Accepted11 Aug 2015
Published19 Aug 2015


Iron deficiency constitutes a major public health problem in Morocco, mainly among women and children. The aim of our paper is to assess the efficacy of consumption of multiple micronutrients (MMN) fortified milk on iron status of Moroccan schoolchildren living in rural region. Children (), aged 7 to 9 y, were recruited from schools and divided into two groups: the nonfortified group (NFG) received daily a nonfortified Ultra-High-Temperature (UHT) milk and the fortified group received (FG) daily UHT milk fortified with multiple micronutrients including iron sulfate. Blood samples were collected at baseline (T0) and after 9 months (T9). Hemoglobin (Hb) was measured in situ by Hemocue device; ferritin and C Reactive Protein were assessed in serum using ELISA and nephelometry techniques, respectively. Results were considered significant when the value was <0.05. At T9 FG showed a reduction of iron deficiency from 50.9% to 37.2% (). Despite the low prevalence of iron deficiency anemia (1.9%); more than 50% of children in our sample suffered from iron deficiency at baseline. The consumption of fortified milk reduced the prevalence of iron deficiency by 27% in schoolchildren living in high altitude rural region of Morocco. Clinical Trial Registration. Our study is registered in the Pan African Clinical Trial Registry with the identification number PACTR201410000896410.

1. Introduction

Anemia is recognized as the most common nutritional deficiency worldwide. There are 2 billion people (>30% of the world’s population) suffering from anemia [1]. Infants and preschoolers are at major risk, especially in the developing countries. Iron deficiency (ID) is the major cause of anemia and both anemia and iron deficiency in infants and young children are associated with adverse effects on neural development [2]. Inadequate diet due to low iron intake and/or bioavailability is its main etiology [3]. In Morocco, according to a Sentinel Survey for Monitoring and Evaluation of the Fortification Process conducted in 2006–2008, 31.5% of children under 5 y of age suffered from anemia [4]. This prevalence did not improve since the last national survey conducted in 2000 where 31.6% of children aged 6 m–5 y were anemic [5].

In 2001 the Moroccan Ministry of Health had developed and implemented the National Program of Fight against Micronutrients Deficiencies (NPFMD), including iron deficiency, which consisted of iron supplementation of children suffering from anemia, nutritional education, and fortification of staple foods commonly consumed by the entire population.

Supplementation programs and health education to change dietary practices in preschool children have achieved limited success [6]; hence, wheat flour was fortified with elemental electrolytic iron and B group vitamins to improve iron status among Moroccan population [7]. The impact study conducted in 2006–2008 revealed that the fortification of flour with elemental iron did not have a significant effect on the reduction of the prevalence of iron deficiency and iron deficiency anemia in children aged 2–5 y. This was mainly due to several factors, for example, the weak bioavailability of iron used in fortification, Moroccan culinary habits, and the widespread use of flour produced by artisanal mills that are not complying with fortification strategy [8]. It has been therefore recommended to replace the form of iron used for wheat flour fortification by one that is more bioavailable [9].

In 2011, the Ministry of Health launched the National Nutrition Strategy (NNS) 2011–2019 with the aim to improve the nutritional status of the Moroccan population. The objective set for iron deficiency anemia was to reduce its prevalence by 1/3 by 2019 compared to its level in 2011 [10].

However, the accomplishment of the objectives of NNS and NPFMD would not be possible without the participation of other actors in order to target specific vulnerable populations like schoolchildren. Therefore, the Foundation for Child Nutrition (FCN), in partnership with the Ministry of National Education (MNE) and the Ministry of Health (MH), started distributing milk fortified with multiple micronutrients to schoolchildren living in rural regions in Morocco most affected by malnutrition. More than 23.500 children benefited from this intervention.

Hence, in partnership with the FCN, the MNE, and the MH, our team undertook a study to assess the efficacy of the consumption of MMN fortified milk (including iron sulfate) on iron nutritional status of schoolchildren living in rural mountainous regions of Morocco.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

The study is a longitudinal interventional, placebo-controlled double blind one conducted among schoolchildren (), aged from 7 to 9 years. It lasted for 9 months from February to October 2012. Children were eligible for the study if they were 7 to 9 years old and were not taking supplements during the period of study. Children presenting signs of severe malnutrition or anemia (Hb < 9 mg/dL) were excluded from the study (and transferred to a local health center for follow-up).

The study got the approval of the Ministry of National Education. The purpose and the protocol of the study were presented and explained to the local authorities, regional medical representatives, school Head Masters, teaching staff, and parent’s union representatives in schools who in turn explained clearly the benefits of the study to children’s parents.

Subsequently, oral and written consents were obtained from children and their parents, respectively, before the beginning of the survey.

Trained medical technicians were recruited from the regional local facilities to help with the samples collection.

2.2. Site of the Study

The region where the study took place is situated in the center of Morocco, it is 400 to 700 m above sea level, the climate is continental, and the rainfall varies between 300 and 750 mm per year. Farming is the dominant activity of the population (78.2% of labor force is rural in 2011) [11].

The region is also known to have low-income communities and high prevalence of micronutrient deficiencies [12]. More than one-third of children aged under 5 y suffer from stunting whereas the national prevalence is 23.7% [13].

2.3. Selection of Schools

The schoolchildren were recruited from primary schools that were selected on the basis of the following criteria: accessibility to our field team and to the milk distributors, large attendance of schoolchildren enough to cover the required number for the study age range, climatic conditions mainly to avoid interruption of milk distribution by unforeseeable weather, and similarity of socioeconomic and living conditions. Schoolchildren were divided into two groups to receive either the fortified or the nonfortified milk. A distance of 52 km separated the two sites to avoid errors of distribution and/or exchange of milk batches between schoolchildren.

2.4. Sample Size

This paper represents one arm of a multiple armed survey aiming to evaluate the nutritional status of schoolchildren with regard to several micronutrients, namely, vitamins A and D, iron, and iodine. Accordingly, the calculation of the sample size was based on the standard deviation (0.6 μmol/L) of the serum level of vitamin A previously determined in a reference regional study on the impact of the consumption of oil fortified with vitamin A on the nutritional status of childbearing women done in 2006–2008 in Morocco. To observe a difference of 0.4 μmol/L with 5% level of significance and 80% power between the intervention and control groups, and after accounting for 20% dropouts, a sample size of 43 children per group was required.

2.5. Milk Composition

Two batches of milk were developed and produced for the purpose of the survey. Both fortified and nonfortified milk were identical in appearance, taste, and smell and had the same packages. The only difference was in the nutritional composition as presented in Table 1.

Nutritional compositionNonfortified milkFortified milk
Amount/200 mL serving% RDI
children 7–9 y
Amount/200 mL serving% RDI
children 7–9 y

Energy (Kcal)154.8154.8
Fat (%)5.85.8
Protein (g)5.85.8
Lipids (g)66
Carbohydrates (g)19.4419.44
Calcium (mg)2403024030
Iron (mg) <0.4<34.230
Iodine (g)20.8<144530
Vitamin D3 (µg)<1<10330
Vitamin A (g)54<724030

RDI: recommended dietary intake.
The values were based on the guidelines of the European Council 2008/100/CE relative to nutritional food labeling.

The amount of fortificant added to the fortified milk to obtain the 30% coverage of RDI was determined based on the guidelines of the European Council 2008/100/CE relative to nutritional food labeling [14].

The macro- and micronutrient contents of each batch of milk were doubly checked by Aquanal (Laboratoire Aquitaine Analyses) in France and LOARC (Laboratoire Officiel d’Analyses et de Recherches Chimiques, Casablanca) in Morocco before the beginning and in midsurvey.

2.6. Allocation of Groups

195 children were assigned to one of the two groups to receive either fortified milk or nonfortified milk by random drawing of schools.

Children in both Fortified Milk Group (FG) and Nonfortified Milk Group (NFG) received daily 200 mL of whole UHT fortified or nonfortified milk, respectively, during the 9 months of the survey (including weekends and vacation days).

Each child was attributed a code and received daily the corresponding type of milk. The distribution of milk was supervised either by the school principal or the teacher in charge. A separate list was prepared for absent children and their milk was delivered to them at the end of the day. Before weekends and vacation days, a quantity of milk sufficient to cover the period was delivered to the parents of the children.

2.7. Data Collection
2.7.1. Socioeconomic Questionnaire (SES)

The data on socioeconomic standards and living conditions of the children and their families were collected at baseline by interviewing the parents. We used an adequate questionnaire that was adapted from other questionnaires used nationally to serve the purpose of our survey. Information collected included the level of education of parents, household size, household monthly global expenses, and alimentary expenses.

2.7.2. Anthropometric Measurements

Anthropometric measurements were taken following standard procedures [15] at baseline. Height was recorded to the nearest 0.1 cm using a stadiometer (Fazzini-2 meters) and weight was recorded to the nearest 0.1 kg using a portable scale (Seca 750-Germany). Stunting and thinness were defined as Height-for-Age (HAZ) and Body Mass Index-for-Age (BAZ) -scores < –2, respectively, according to the World Health Organization (WHO) [16].

2.8. Biochemical Analyses
2.8.1. Hb Measurements

Hb analysis was done at baseline and end line. It was performed in situ using the Hemocue portable spectrophotometer (HemoCue AB, Angelholm, Sweden) on a drop of venous blood withdrawn while doing the blood sampling. Anemia was defined as Hb levels <11.5 mg/dL [16]. Hb values measured were adjusted for altitude [17].

2.8.2. Blood Sampling

Whole blood (8 mL) was collected in dry tubes from nonfasting children at baseline and endpoint by venipuncture. Directly after collection, the samples were centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 5 mn and serum was aliquoted in Cryovial tubes and transferred in isothermic box under 4–8°C to the laboratory and then stored at −80°C until analysis of serum Ferritin (SF) and C Reactive Protein (CRP). All the analyses were performed in laboratories of UMRNA (Unité Mixte de Recherche en Nutrition et Alimentation URAC39, Université Ibn Tofail-CNESTEN, Kénitra-Rabat, Morocco).

(1) Assessment of Serum Ferritin. Quantitative determination of ferritin level in the serum was performed in the laboratory using a colorimetric immunoenzymatic method type ELISA sandwich (NovaTec Immundiagnostica GMBH, Germany). Iron deficiency was defined as serum ferritin <15 μg/L and iron deficiency anemia was defined as iron deficiency along with anemia [16].

(2) Serum Concentrations of CRP. The level of CRP in the serum was determined by nephelometry using the Minineph kit (MININEPH, Références, ZK044.L.R, The Binding Site, Birmingham, UK). In our survey CRP serves mainly as a biomarker of inflammation or subclinical infection on days of blood sampling. A cutoff of >10 mg/L was used for abnormal serum CRP concentrations [18].

2.9. Statistical Analysis

Data analysis was done by the software IBM SPSS Statistics version 20 (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences). Anthropometric measurements were analyzed by Anthro+ (WHO standards) [16]. The distribution normality of the quantitative variables was tested by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The variables normally distributed were presented as mean ± standard deviation and those nonnormally distributed as median (interquartile range). ANOVA was used to compare variances between independent samples. The homogeneity of variances was tested using Leven’s test, and the correction of Welch was used in the case of nonhomogeneous variances. Mann-Whitney test was used to compare independent samples for variables nonnormally distributed. Wilcoxon test was used to compare the relation between T0 and T9 within the same group. The nominal variables were presented as proportion and 95% Confidence Interval (Lower-Upper). Chi-square test was used to test independence between nominal variables. Chi-square value was corrected for cells with a theoretical frequency less than 5; if a theoretical we take the value of Fisher, and 95% Confidence Intervals were determined using the Bootstrap technique based on 1000 bootstrap samples. The correlation between high CRP values (>10 mg/L) and high ferritin level was tested using Bivariate Correlations test. A difference was considered as statistically significant if .

3. Results

Figure 1 represents the participant flowchart. The rate of compliance was not the same in both groups; we observed a larger number of dropouts in the fortified group that was due to participants’ refusal to continue the survey (children refused to give blood samples or were absent on the day of blood withdrawal), change of school, or relocation out of the study area. Nevertheless, the size of the sample in FG was still statistically valid. No adverse events because of the intervention were reported during the course of the study.

The growth parameters and socioeconomic characteristics are presented in Table 2.

Total ()NFG ()FG () value

General characteristics
 Age (y) (mean ± SD) 8.0 ± 0.78.0 ± 0.77.9 ± 0.80.371
Baseline anthropometry
 Height (cm) (mean ± SD) 122.3 ± 6.1121.9 ± 6.3122.8 ± 5.60.352
 Weight (kg) (mean ± SD)23.2 ± 3.023.1 ± 3.023.2 ± 2.90.483
 BMI (kg/m2) (mean ± SD)15.4 ± 1.115.5 ± 1.015.4 ± 1.20.358
Nutritional status
 Stunting HAZ <−2 SD (%)8.46.810.30.219
 Thinness BAZ <−2 SD (%)2.105.1

%95% CI%95% CI%95% CI value

 Female50.6 (42.9–58.3)52.4 (42.7–61.2)47.7 (35.4–60.0)0.815
 Male49.4 (41.7–57.1)47.6 (38.8–57.3)52.3 (40.0–64.6)
Level of education
  Illiterate95.2 (91.7–98.2)98.1 (95.1–100.0)90.8 (83.1–96.9)0.069
  Primary3.6 (1.2–6.5)1.0 (0.0–2.9)7.7 (1.5–15.4)
  Secondary1.2 (0.0–3.6)1.0 (0.0–2.9)1.5 (0.0–4.6)
  Illiterate60.7 (53.6–68.5)60.2 (51.5–68.9)61.5 (49.2–73.8)0.562
  Primary31.5 (24.4–38.7)32.0 (23.3–40.8)30.8 (18.5–43.1)
  Secondary7.1 (3.6–11.3)7.8 (2.9–13.6)6.2 (1.5–12.3)
  College0.6 (0.0–1.8)0.01.5 (0.0–4.6)
Household size
 <6 persons48.8 (41.1–56.5)49.5 (39.8–59.2)47.7 (35.4–60.0)0.944
 6 to 10 persons51.2 (43.5–58.9)50.5 (40.8–60.2)52.3 (40.0–64.6)
Total monthly expense
 <122US$25.6 (19.6–32.7)28.2 (19.4–37.8)21.5 (12.3–32.3)0.117
 122–195US$28.6 (21.4–35.7)21.4 (14.6–29.1)40.0 (27.7–52.3)
 196–244US$26.2 (20.2–32.7)31.1 (22.3–39.8)18.5 (9.2–29.2)
 245–366US$11.9 (7.1–16.7)11.7 (5.8–18.4)12.3 (4.6–20.0)
 >367US$7.7 (4.2–11.9)7.8 (2.9–13.6)7.7 (1.5–13.8)
Monthly expense for food
 <110US$63.1 (55.4–70.2)60.2 (50.5–69.9)67.7 (55.4–78.5)0.076
 110–147US$18.5 (12.5–24.4)23.3 (15.5–31.1)10.8 (3.1–18.5)
 148–195US$9.5 (5.4–14.3)6.8 (2.9–12.6)13.8 (6.2–23.0)
 196–305US$8.3 (4.8–12.5)9.7 (3.9–16.5)6.2 (1.5–12.3)
 >306US$0.6 (0.0–1.8)0.01.5 (0.0–4.6)

BMI: Body Mass Index; HAZ and BAZ were calculated by Anthropo+.

There were no significant differences in baseline anthropometric measurements or socioeconomic characteristics of children between the NFG and the FG.

In general, the prevalence of illiteracy in mothers for both groups was high compared to fathers with 95.2% and 60.7%, respectively.

91.1% of households spend less than 195 US$/m for food compared to 54.4% for general expenditure. 195 US$ is the equivalent of the guaranteed minimum wage for governmental employees.

To assess the dietary habits of our population, we used a food frequency questionnaire that was filled by the children’s mothers at baseline. The preliminary analysis of the data collected showed that the majority of children consumed foods rich in iron or that stimulate its absorption (e.g., meat, legumes, and fruits). Dairy products consumption was moderate for yogurt and low for cheese. On the other hand, more than 90% of children consumed tea at least once per week, which could be the reason behind the high prevalence of ID among children. Both groups had similar food trends and the difference in dietary behaviors between FG and NFG was not statistically significant ().

3.1. Iron Deficiency (Tables 3 and 4)

At T9 FG showed a reduction of the prevalence of iron deficiency (serum ferritin < 15 μg/L) in comparison with T0 from 50.9% (95% CI: 38.6–63.2) to 37.2% (95% CI: 23.3–51.2), while for the NFG it remained stable between T0 and T9 at 56% and 56.4%, respectively. The difference between FG and NFG was statistically significant at T9 (). The value calculated within the same groups between T0 and T9 was significant for the FG () and nonsignificant for the NFG ().

Biochemical parameters Total NFG FG value
Mean ± SDMean ± SDMean ± SD

Hemoglobin (mg/dL)
 Baseline17814.45 ± 1.4611414.58 ± 1.586414.22 ± 1.210.090
 End line 17814.88 ± 1.3511415.05 ± 1.436414.59 ± 1.160.213

Median; interquartileMedian; interquartileMedian; interquartile value

Serum ferritin (g/L)
 Baseline15813.0 (9.0; 21.0)10113.0 (8.0; 21.0)5714.0 (9.0; 20.0)0.610
 End line 14414.0 (9.0; 22.7)10113.0 (8.0; 20.0)4317.0 (11.0; 26.0)0.019

value by one way ANOVA for means and Mann-Whitney test for medians.

%95% CI%95% CI%95% CI value
= 195 = 117 = 78

Anemia (Hb < 11.5 mg/dL)
 Baseline2.2(0.6–4.5)2.6(0.0–6.1)1.6 (0.0–4.7)0.999
 End line2.2(0.6–4.5)2.6(0.0–6.1)1.6 (0.0–4.7)0.999
Iron deficiency anemia (Hb < 11.5 mg/dL and fe < 15 g/L)
 Baseline1.9(0.0–4.5)2.0(0.0–5.0)1.8 (0.0–5.3)0.760
 End line1.4(0.0–3.5)2.0(0.0–5.0)0.0 (0.0–0.0)0.064
Iron deficiency (Fe < 15 g/L)
 Baseline = 158 = 101 = 57
54.1(45.9–62.4)56.0(47.0–65.0)50.9 (38.6–63.2)0.536
 End line = 144 = 101 = 43
50.7(43.1–59.0)56.4(45.6–66.3)37.2 (23.3–51.2)0.035
value for iron deficiency within same group 0.9270.037

value for comparing deficiency prevalence among study groups using -test.
value for comparing deficiency prevalence within same study group using Wilcoxon test.
Anemia was defined as Hb levels <11.5 mg/dL. Iron deficiency anemia was defined as iron deficiency along with anemia by the above-mentioned criteria. Iron deficiency was defined as serum ferritin <15 g/L.

The median (interquartile) of serum ferritin increased in the FG from 14.0 (9.0; 20.0) at T0 to 17.0 (11.0; 26.0) at T9, while it remained stable in NFG. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant at T9 ().

3.2. Anemia and Iron Deficiency Anemia (Tables 3 and 4)

The prevalence of iron deficiency anemia (IDA) (Hb < 11.5 mg/dL and ferritin < 15 μg/L) for the FG dropped from 1.8% (95% CI: 0.0–5.3) at T0 to 0.0% at T9. For the NFG, it remained unchanged at 2.0% both at baseline and end line. The difference between both groups was not statistically significant at T9 ().

The mean Hb increased slightly in both groups. At T0 it was and for NFG and FG, respectively, whereas at T9 it became and .

The difference between the two groups at T9 was not statistically significant ().

4. Discussion

Our results showed that the consumption of milk fortified with ferrous sulfate and other micronutrients is efficacious in reducing the prevalence of iron deficiency and improving iron status indicators in a sample of children 7–9 y of age. Authors from different countries previously published results of efficacy interventions using fortified milk and reported varying degrees of success in reducing the iron deficiency depending on the dose and duration of intervention.

In Chile, two studies conducted in infants confirmed the efficacy of iron-fortified milk with ferrous sulfate combined with ascorbic acid [19, 20]. While in India, a trial conducted among children aged 1–4 years for a period of one year demonstrated the efficacy of a multiple micronutrients (including iron and zinc) fortified milk on growth, body iron stores, and anemia [21].

In 2003, a study done in Morocco to assess the effect of a dual-fortified salt (DFS) containing iodine and microencapsulated iron on nutritional status of schoolchildren showed that the prevalence of IDA in the fortified group decreased from 35% at baseline to 8% after 40 weeks of intervention () [22].

While two other surveys conducted in Brazil and Sweden revealed a lesser efficacy of fortified milk. In the first one 185 Brazilian children with mild or severe anemia received milk fortified with 3 mg/L of iron amino acid chelate. After 222 days of intervention, 43% remained anemic. The reduced efficacy in this study was attributed to the low level of iron fortification (3 mg/L) [23], while in Sweden, a controlled trial in 36 children treated for 6 months with fortified milk with 7.0 or 14.9 mg/L of iron reported no significant effects on hematological and iron status indicators and this has been explained by the fact that these children had a good baseline iron status; thus, noticeable changes in Hemoglobin or iron status should not be expected [24].

In our trial, we observed an increase of median ferritin levels and a marked reduction in the prevalence of iron deficiency (27%) in FG, compared to NFG, and this has been reported by other fortification trials conducted in low-income countries [25, 26] which highlights a specific effect attributable to the intervention. Also availability of vitamin A, essential for erythropoiesis, could have resulted in a better overall improvement of iron status [27].

However, it is worthy to emphasize that our milk contained naturally a high calcium level (240 mg of calcium per 200 mL) and it is well known that calcium in milk interferes significantly with the absorption of iron. The mechanism of action for absorption inhibition is unknown. Recent analyses of the dose-effect relationship show that the first 40 mg of calcium in a meal does not inhibit absorption of haem and nonhaem iron. Above this level of calcium intake, a sigmoid relationship develops, and at levels of 300–600 mg calcium, it reaches a 60% maximal inhibition of iron absorption [28]. Thus, the effects on the prevalence of anemia and iron status herein described were most probably modulated by the interaction of both iron and calcium at the mucosal cell (at the intestinal level), resulting in a less pronounced efficacy in improving iron than fortification without a high level of calcium. The efficacy could have also been more evident if enhancers of iron absorption had been added to this milk. Ferrous sulfate along with vitamin C, to potentiate bioavailability of iron, added to milk proved to be more effective in reducing the prevalence of anemia in other studies [21, 29, 30].

5. Conclusions

This study provides evidence that delivery of iron via a food-based vehicle, milk in this instance, is a feasible option and produces a positive effect on iron status among schoolchildren. It provides a potential strategy for achieving Millennium Development Goals targeting reduction in mortality, morbidity, and malnutrition among children, constituting an example of how the use of research can directly benefit the design of successful public nutrition programs such as the National Nutrition Strategy, the National Program of Fight against Micronutrient Deficiencies, and the application of the recommendations of the second International Conference on Nutrition (ICN2). Indeed, our work may represent a solution at the national level, encouraging the generalized distribution of fortified breakfasts sponsored by the MNE in rural schools. There are indications (according to FCN) that such distribution may result in a reduction of school dropout rates too.

Limitations of the Study

Because of a priori criteria of selection of the schools, we were unable to recruit an equal number of children in both groups (as shown in Figure 1). In spite of this and the small size of the study population our findings were statistically valid. Nevertheless, future studies should try to overcome these limitations.


BAZ:Body Mass Index-for-Age -scores
CRP:C Reactive Protein
DFS:Dual-fortified salt
FCN:Foundation for Child Nutrition
FG:Fortified Milk Group
HAZ:Height for age -scores
ID:Iron deficiency
IDA:Iron deficiency anemia
MH:Ministry of Health
MMN:Multiple micronutrients
MNE:Ministry of National Education
NFG:Nonfortified Milk Group
NNS:National Nutrition Strategy
NPFMD:National Program of Fight against Micronutrients Deficiencies
RDI:Recommended dietary intake
SD:Standard deviation
SES:Socioeconomic Status
SF:Serum ferritin
SPSS:Statistical Package for the Social Sciences
WAZ:Weight for age -scores.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare having no conflict of interests. None of the authors was affiliated in any way with an entity involved with the manufacture or marketing of milk.


The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the contributions of schoolchildren who participated in this study, their parents, teachers, health workers, local authorities, and other support staff. We are also grateful to acknowledge the contribution of Foundation for Child Nutrition for providing UHT milk used in the survey.


  1. World Health Organization, “Global targets 2025. To improve maternal, Infant and young child nutrition,” October 2014, View at: Google Scholar
  2. World Health Organization, The World Health Report 2001: Mental Health: New Understanding, New Hope, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2001.
  3. L. Allen, B. de Benoist, O. Dary, and R. Hurrell, Eds., Guidelines on Food Fortification with Micronutrients, World Health Organization/Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Geneva, Switzerland, 2006.
  4. Ministère de la Santé, Système Sentinelle de Suivi et Évaluation du Processus de la Fortification et son impact sur l'état nutritionnel de la Population. Projet GAIN/Composante Suivi et Évaluation, Rabat Rapport, Ministère de la Santé, Direction de la Population, 2008.
  5. Ministère de la Santé, “Enquête nationale sur l’anémie par carence en fer, la supplémentation et la couverture des ménages par le sel iodé,” Rapport Ministère de la Santé, Ministère de la Santé, Rabat, Morocco, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  6. L. H. Allen, “Iron supplements: scientific issues concerning efficacy and implications for research and programs,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 132, no. 4, pp. 813S–819S, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  7. H. Aguenaou, “La malnutrition invisible ou la «faim cachée» au Maroc et les stratégies de lute,” Biomatec Echo, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 158–164, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  8. A. El Hamdouchi, K. El Kari, E. A. Rjimati, M. El Mzibri, N. Mokhtar, and H. Aguenaou, “Does flour fortification with electrolytic elemental iron improve the prevalence of iron deficiency anaemia among women in childbearing age and preschool children in Morocco?” Mediterranean Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 73–78, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. N. Mokhtar, MS/UNICEF, Evaluation de la situation nutritionnelle au Maroc, Mars 2010 (communication personnelle).
  10. MS/UNICEF, “La Stratégie Nationale de la Nutrition 2011–2019,” View at: Google Scholar
  11. HCP-Direction régionale Tadla Azilal-Monographie régionale 2012,
  12. MS—Enquête Nationale sur la Population et la Santé ENPS-II, 1992,
  13. Enquête sur la Population et la Santé Familiale EPSF, 2003/2004,
  14. Directive 2008/100/CE de la Commission modifiant la directive 90/496/CEE du Conseil relative à l’étiquetage nutritionnel des denrées alimentaires en ce qui concerne les apports journaliers recommandés, les coefficients de conversion pour le calcul de la valeur énergétique et les définitions,
  15. T. G. Lohman, A. F. Roche, and R. Martorell, Anthropometric Standardization Reference Manual, Human Kinetics, Champaign, Ill, USA, 1988.
  16. WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group, WHO Child Growth Standards: 406 Length/Height-for-Age, Weight-for-Age, Weight-for-Length, Weight-for-Height and Body 407 Mass Index-for-Age: Methods and Development, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2006,
  17. H. Dirren, M. H. G. M. Logman, D. V. Barclay, and W. B. Freire, “Altitude correction for hemoglobin,” European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 48, no. 9, pp. 625–632, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  18. V. Q. Bui, A. D. Stein, A. M. DiGirolamo et al., “Associations between serum C-reactive protein and serum zinc, ferritin, and copper in Guatemalan school children,” Biological Trace Element Research, vol. 148, no. 2, pp. 154–160, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. A. Stekel, M. Olivares, M. Cayazzo, P. Chadud, S. Llaguno, and F. Pizarro, “Prevention of iron deficiency by milk fortification. II A field trial with a full-fat acidified milk,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 265–269, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  20. E. Hertrampf, M. Olivares, T. Walter et al., “Iron-deficiency anemia in the nursing infant: its elimination with iron-fortified milk,” Revista Médica de Chile, vol. 118, no. 12, pp. 1330–1337, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  21. S. Sazawal, U. Dhingra, P. Dhingra et al., “Micronutrient fortified milk improves iron status, anemia and growth among children 1–4 years: a double masked, randomized, controlled trial,” PLoS ONE, vol. 5, no. 8, Article ID e12167, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. M. B. Zimmermann, C. Zeder, N. Chaouki, A. Saad, T. Torresani, and R. F. Hurrell, “Dual fortification of salt with iodine and microencapsulated iron: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial in Moroccan schoolchildren,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 425–432, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  23. C. Iost, J. J. Name, R. B. Jeppsen, and H. D. Ashmead, “Repleting hemoglobin in iron deficiency anemia in young children through liquid milk fortification with bioavailable iron amino acid chelate,” Journal of the American College of Nutrition, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 187–194, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. M. A. Virtanen, C. J. E. Svahn, L. U. Viinikka, N. C. R. Räihä, M. A. Siimes, and I. E. M. Axelsson, “Iron-fortified and unfortified cow's milk: effects on iron intakes and iron status in young children,” Acta Paediatrica, vol. 90, no. 7, pp. 724–731, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  25. D. M. Ash, S. R. Tatala, E. A. Frongillo Jr., G. D. Ndossi, and M. C. Latham, “Randomized efficacy trial of a micronutrient-fortified beverage in primary school children in Tanzania,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 891–898, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  26. M. Faber, J. D. Kvalsvig, C. J. Lombard, and A. J. S. Benadé, “Effect of a fortified maize-meal porridge on anemia, micronutrient status, and motor development of infants,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 82, no. 5, pp. 1032–1039, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  27. C. M. Smuts, M. A. Dhansay, M. Faber et al., “Efficacy of multiple micronutrient supplementation for improving anemia, micronutrient status, and growth in South African infants,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 135, no. 3, pp. 653S–659S, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  28. World Health Organization, Vitamin and Mineral Requirements in Human Nutrition: Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation, World Health Organization, Bangkok, Thailand, 1998,
  29. A. Stekel, M. Olivares, F. Pizarro, P. Chadud, I. Lopez, and M. Amar, “Absorption of fortification iron from milk formulas in infants,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 917–922, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  30. A. Stekel, M. Olivares, F. Pizarro et al., “Prevention of iron deficiency in infants by fortified milk. Field study of a low-fat milk,” Archivos Latinoamericanos de Nutrición, vol. 36, pp. 654–661, 1986. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Imane El Menchawy et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.