Journal of Oncology

Journal of Oncology / 2013 / Article

Clinical Study | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 349162 | 7 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/349162

The Use of Strontium-90 Beta Radiotherapy as Adjuvant Treatment for Conjunctival Melanoma

Academic Editor: Akira Hara
Received08 Aug 2012
Accepted10 Dec 2012
Published31 Jan 2013

Abstract

Background/Aims. To report the safety and efficacy of strontium (Sr90) beta radiotherapy as adjuvant treatment for conjunctival melanoma. Methods. A retrospective cohort study was undertaken from 1999 to 2007 of all patients who underwent Sr90 beta radiotherapy for incompletely excised conjunctival melanoma. Failure of treatment was defined as recurrence of a conjunctival melanoma at the same location following beta radiotherapy. Results. Twenty patients underwent Sr90 beta radiotherapy for incompletely excised conjunctival melanoma. Median follow-up interval was 59 months (8–152). All patients had conjunctival melanoma involving the bulbar conjunctiva. Underlying diagnoses included PAM with atypia in 60% (12 of 20), PAM without atypia in 15% (3 of 20), and de novo conjunctival melanoma in 25% (5 of 20). Following Sr90 beta radiotherapy, in 90% (18 out of 20) local control was achieved and visual acuity was not affected in any patient. Three patients (15%) had dry eye symptoms, episcleritis, and descemetcoele, respectively. No cataract or secondary glaucoma was reported. Conclusions. Sr90 treatment is a very effective adjuvant treatment after excisional biopsy and cryotherapy for conjunctival melanoma with a local success rate of 90%. The treatment is not associated with significant side effects and visual acuity is not affected.

1. Introduction

Conjunctival melanoma accounts for 1-2% of all ocular melanomas [1]. The management of conjunctival melanoma is fraught with difficulties. The majority of patients have the associated condition of primary acquired melanosis (PAM) with atypia and are therefore prone to multiple new tumours throughout their lifetime [2, 3]. Recurrent or incompletely excised conjunctival melanoma is associated with an increased risk of metastases [3]. Therefore, primary conjunctival melanoma is managed by complete excision and double freeze-thaw cryotherapy. Adjuvant therapy is necessary to improve local tumour control and survival of the patient especially when the histopathology reports indicate tumour is present at the surgical margins. Adjuvant therapy includes cryotherapy [4], topical mitomycin C [5], brachytherapy [68], proton beam radiotherapy [9], or rarely alpha 2b interferon [10]. Brachytherapy includes the use of ruthenium-106, [6, 7] iodine-191 [8], or strontium-90 beta radiotherapy.

Strontium-90 (Sr90) beta radiotherapy is a noninvasive treatment using a hand held applicator (Figure 1). It has also been used for controlling wound healing after glaucoma drainage surgery [11]. It is only available for the treatment of ocular surface tumours in the London Ocular Oncology Service: the other two ocular oncology centres in the UK do not own an applicator as they are no longer produced by Bebig. It is administered under topical anaesthetic in the outpatient setting. Treatments are fractionated to minimise radiation complications. The Sr90 ophthalmic applicators [Bebig] (Figure 2) consist of a radioactive source and a shielded holder for the source. Radioactive source consists of a palladium coating, an encapsulating material of silver and strontium-90 is the encapsulated material. Sr90 is a radioactive substance with a long half-life of 28.6 years and a maximum energy of 2.3 MeV. It decays to Yttrium-90 with a half-life of 29 years with the emission of a beta particle of maximum energy of 0.55 MeV. Yttrium-90 decays to stable zirconium-90 with emission of a beta particle of minimum energy of 2.27 MeV [12].

The holder of the source consists of a shielding plate made from polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), a fixation ring for the shielding plate and a holder with mechanism to grab the source. Two applicators of different size were used depending on the area of the lesion. SIA-1 applicator has an active disc of 18 mm and an activity of 10 mCi with an approximate surface/dose rate of 2 rads/sec. SIA-6 applicator has an active disc of 12 mm and an activity of 10 mCi with an approximate surface/dose rate of 4 rads/sec. These applicators have an outer peripheral rim of about 2 mm that is inactive (Figure 2).

The data available for the usage of Sr90 as an adjuvant treatment in conjunctival melanoma is limited. The aim of this study is to examine the efficacy and safety of Sr90 applicators as adjuvant treatment in a cohort of patients with conjunctival melanoma.

2. Materials and Methods

A retrospective cohort study was undertaken from 1999 to 2011 of all patients who underwent Sr90 beta radiotherapy for incompletely excised conjunctival melanoma. The parameters assessed were the patients’ age, sex and predisposing diagnosis, pre- and posttreatment visual acuity, applicator type, and length of followup and tumour parameters including location, size, and histopathology results. All patients were treated with five fractions of 10 Gy hence the total dose was 50 Gy administered to the scleral surface. Because the type of radiation used is not very penetrating, the dose falls of very rapidly with depth and is only around half this by the time it has reached 1 mm into the tissue.

The main outcomes measured were melanoma recurrence at the treatment site and ocular complications. Failure of treatment was defined as the development of recurrence in the treated area. Development of melanoma in other nontreated areas was not characterized as failure of treatment as many patients with conjunctival melanoma have PAM with atypia.

All data were entered in an Excel database and statistical analysis was performed with the use of SPSS 13.0. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to determine the recurrence free disease at treatment site at 5 and 10 years.

3. Results

Over 8 years, twenty patients (11 males and 9 females) with biopsy proven conjunctival melanoma were treated with adjuvant Sr90 beta radiotherapy. Median age of the patients was 68 yrs (range 54–92 yrs). Median followup was 59 months (8–152 months). Table 1 presents patients’ clinical data.


PatientAgeGenderTumor locationTumor size (mm)Tumor thickness (mm) TNM
Classification1
Primary excision and cryotherapyMode of strontium treatmentTime to strontium treatment (months)Type of applicator

158FInferior temporal5 × 30.6T1N0MXYAdjuvant (base and lateral)3SIA 6
286FTemporal8 × 41T2N0MXYAdjuvant (base and lateral)2SIA 6
372MInferior temporal5 × 51T4N0MXYBase adjuvant 3SIA 6
471MInferior nasal10 × 76T1N0MXYAdjuvant (base and lateral)3SIA 6
592FTemporal6 × 42.5T2N0MXYAdjuvant (base and lateral)3SIA 6
672MTemporal0.7 × 0.3Not assessed thoroughly T4N0MXYSecondary to recurrence4SIA 6
763FTemporal6 × 40.6 mmT2N0MXYAdjuvant (base and lateral)2SIA 6
869MSuperior nasal3 × 1.81.9T1N0MXYAdjuvant (base and lateral)3SIA 6
961FTemporal2 × 24T1N0MXYAdjuvant (base and lateral)3SIA 6
1068FTemporal9 × 31 mmT2N0MXYSecondary to recurrence4SIA 6
1168MTemporal14 × 83T2N0MXYAdjuvant (base and lateral)1SIA 1
1276MInferior temporal11 × 4.56T2N0MXYAdjuvant (base and lateral)2SIA 6
1365FTemporal10 × 81.3T2N0MXYAdjuvant (base and lateral)3SIA 6
1460MNasal7 × 52T2N0MXYSecondary to recurrence3SIA 1
1569MTemporal13 × 61.5T2N0MXYAdjuvant (base and lateral)1SIA 1
1667MSuperonasal6 × 11T1N0MXYSecondary to recurrence1SIA 6
1763FTemporal7 × 2.51T2N0MXYAdjuvant (base and lateral)2SIA 6
1854FTemporal6 × 3 1T2N0MXYAdjuvant (base and lateral)1SIA 6
1969FSuperiorN/AN/AT1N0MXYAdjuvant (base and lateral)2SIA 6
2072MSuperior1.5 × 1.0Not assessed thoroughly T1N0MXYAdjuvant (base and lateral)4SIA 6

TNM classification primary tumour (T): TX: primary tumour cannot be assessed, T0: no evidence of primary tumour, T1: tumour of bulbar conjunctival occupying one quadrant or less, T2: tumour of the bulbar conjunctiva occupying more than 1 quadrant, T3: tumour of conjunctival fornix and palpebral conjunctiva or caruncle, T4: tumour invades eyelid, cornea, or orbit. Regional lymph nodes (N): N: NX: regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed, N0: no regional lymph node metastasis, N1: regional lymph node metastasis. Distant metastasis (M): MX: distant metastasis cannot be assessed, M0: no distant metastasis, M1: distant metastasis.
*SIA 6: 12 mm ophthalmic applicator, SIA 1: 18 mm ophthalmic applicator.

In regards to predisposing conjunctival pathology, eleven patients had associated PAM with atypia, (12/20, 60%), three patients had associated PAM without atypia (3/20, 15%), and in five patients conjunctival melanoma developed de novo without the presence of associated PAM (5/20, 25%).

All patients underwent complete excision of the lesion with adjuvant double freeze-thaw cryotherapy at the margins of the lesion after initial referral. Seventeen patients were treated with the SIA-6 applicator (17/20, 85%) with a median duration of treatment at 236 seconds, 10 Gy per fraction and three patients were treated with the SIA-1 applicator (3/20, 15%) with a median duration of treatment at 767 seconds, 10 Gy per fraction. The total number of fractions was always five.

In all cases Sr90 beta radiotherapy was applied as adjuvant treatment. In seventeen cases (17/20, 85%) Sr90 radiotherapy was applied as adjuvant treatment following excisional biopsy and cryotherapy of a new conjunctival melanoma. The interval between primary treatment and Sr90 radiotherapy ranged from 1 to 12 months with a mean of 3 months. In three cases (3/20, 15%) treatment was applied as adjuvant treatment of a recurrent conjunctival melanoma following excision and cryotherapy. Two of the three recurrent cases had failed treatment with excision biopsy and one had failed treatment with topical mitomycin C. None of the patients had received prior adjuvant strontium radiotherapy.

In eleven patients (11/20, 55%) the tumour was located at the temporal bulbar conjunctiva, in three patients inferotemporally (3/20, 15%) and in the remaining seven patients in other locations (Table 1). Most of the cases presented with limbal involvement (15/20, 75%). In 9 out of 18 patients (50%) tumour thickness was more than 1 mm.

Eighteen out of 20 patients (90%) were tumour-free in the treated area at the end of follow-up period (Figure 3). Estimated percentage of recurrence free disease was 82% at 5 and 10 years (Figure 4). Only two patients (2/20, 10%) developed a recurrence in the treated area at 15 months and 37 months after treatment, respectively. Area of recurrence was treated with lamellar scleral dissection and adjuvant cryotherapy in one case and excisional biopsy and cryotherapy in the other.

Following adjuvant Sr90 beta radiotherapy, 85% of patients (17/20) suffered no ocular complications. There was no difference on the pre- and post-treatment visual acuity in any patient (see Table 2). This is an important result as it illustrates that no visually significant cataract developed during the period of followup which ranged up to 12 years. One patient had transient episcleritis that responded to local anti-inflammatory treatment (1/20, 5%), one had transient dry eye symptoms (1/20, 5%) and there was another single case of a descemetocele (1/20, 5%).


PatientVisual acuity before TXVisual acuity after TX

16/56/5
26/96/9
36/66/9
46/66/6
56/96/9
66/186/18
76/96/9
86/56/6
96/66/6
106/66/6
116/66/6
126/96/9
136/96/9
146/56/5
156/66/5
166/66/5
176/66/6
186/126/9
196/56/6
206/186/18

4. Discussion

The use of Sr90 applicators for the treatment of conjunctival melanoma has not been extensively reported [1317]. In our study all patients had an initial excisional biopsy followed by cryotherapy and received adjunctive Sr90 beta radiotherapy. In other studies Sr90 has been either used as primary treatment or as adjuvant treatment with or without cryotherapy [1317].

A total dose of 50 Gy was administered. From other studies (Table 3) there does not appear to be a standardized regimen but on average, the total dose is 36–60 Gy and fraction size is typically 10 Gy.


Local complications
AuthorPtsPrimary TXAdjuvant TXDosimetry (total)Followup Success rate (%)Scleral melting Dry eye DescemetoceleEpiscleritisTelangiectasiaCataractSecondary glaucoma Corneal opacities

Lommatzsch [13, 14]45Sr90 beta radiotherapy None10 to 200 Gy1Up to 14 years70% (31/45) 0 0 0 0 18 7 2 3
20 Excisional biopsySr9010 to 200 Gy1Up to 14 yearsNot specified2
Krause et al. [15]15Excisional biopsy Sr9054 Gy1–5 years80% (12/15)Not addressed
Missotten et al. [16]346Excisional biopsy3Sr9060 Gy ( )
35.4 Gy ( )
8 years mean95% (36/38)
43% (3/7)
1Unspecified number4000000
Our study 20Excisional biopsy with cryotherapySr9050 Gy0.5–10 years90% (18/20)01110000

Unknown number of fractions.
2Overall success rate 75% (51/65).
3Abstract currently available. It is unclear from the publicly available data whether these patients were subjected to cryotherapy.
4Abstract currently available. It is unclear from the publicly available data what is the exact number of patients with dry eye symptoms described as being transient.

Success rate at the end of follow-up period was 90%. A previous study showed a success rate of 80% for a total dose of 54 Gy [15]. A recent case series had a success rate of 95% for a total dose of 60 Gy and 43% for a total dose of 35 Gy highlighting that delivery of less than 40 Gy in the treated area is probably not sufficient for tumour control [16].

Local complications were not severe. One patient developed episcleritis and one patient developed a descemetocele. None of our patients developed neovascular glaucoma or cataract. Visual acuity was not affected in any of our patients at the end of follow-up period. Scleral melting and transient dry eye symptoms have been previously reported [16]. Scleral melting was not noted in this series. Primary Sr90 treatment for conjunctival melanoma has been associated with telangiectasia, discomfort, and cataract [13, 14]. No such complications were noted with adjuvant Sr90 radiotherapy.

Sr90 radiotherapy appears to be safer and more effective in comparison to other proposed methods of adjuvant treatment for conjunctival melanoma. In comparison to topical mitomycin C, no patient experienced discomfort or pain after treatment and none of the long-term complications such as punctal stenosis, limbal stem cell deficiency, or keratoconjunctivitis were noted [5, 18, 19]. Reported recurrence rates for topical mitomycin C from various case series were 20–50% [5, 1820]. In our study recurrence rate following Sr90 beta radiotherapy was 10%. Topical Interferon alpha 2b results were encouraging in a small case series with no local complications [10]; however, no long-term data is available. Ruthenium plaque brachytherapy has been used as adjuvant treatment with delivery of a high dose of 290–320 Gy [6, 7] or low dose of 100 Gy [1] but these publications are confined to case reports. Proton bean radiotherapy has been used widely as adjuvant treatment in recurrent conjunctival melanoma and is associated with high rates of severe local complications including sicca syndrome, eyelash loss, cataract, limbal stem cell deficiency, and squamous metaplasia of the corneal epithelium and neovascular glaucoma which sometimes necessitates removal of the eye [9, 21].

Despite the excellent therapeutic outcome, Sr90 beta radiotherapy has limitations. The location and size of the tumour are of paramount importance in deciding which adjuvant treatment to use. Sr90 beta radiotherapy is limited to use on the bulbar conjunctiva. This is due to the shape and size of the applicator. Custom designed iodine plaques that are reverse mounted can be used to treat tarsal conjunctival melanoma following primary excision (communication with Dr. Carol and Jerry Shields). The additional problem of Sr90 beta radiotherapy is its availability. The applicators are no longer being produced due to low demand. This is a problem for Ocular Oncologists in new centres and Glaucoma specialists, especially those practicing in developing countries. Thankfully, due to the long half-life of Strontium, most applicators when cared for correctly are still in use even 20–30 years on.

In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that adjuvant Sr90 beta radiotherapy is safe and effective at preventing local recurrence of conjunctival melanoma.

References

  1. B. Damato and S. E. Coupland, “An audit of conjunctival melanoma treatment in Liverpool,” Eye, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 801–809, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. C. L. Shields, J. A. Shields, K. Gündüz et al., “Conjunctival melanoma: risk factors for recurrence, exenteration, metastasis, and death in 150 consecutive patients,” Archives of Ophthalmology, vol. 118, no. 11, pp. 1497–1507, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  3. C. L. Shields, J. S. Markowitz, I. Belinsky et al., “Conjunctival melanoma: outcomes based on tumor origin in 382 consecutive cases,” Ophthalmology, vol. 118, no. 2, pp. 389–395, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. F. A. Jakobiec, F. J. Rini, F. T. Fraunfelder, and S. Brownstein, “Cryotherapy for conjunctival primary acquired melanosis and malignant melanoma. Experience with 62 cases,” Ophthalmology, vol. 95, no. 8, pp. 1058–1070, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  5. L. C. Ditta, Y. Shildkrot, and M. W. Wilson, “Outcomes in 15 patients with conjunctivalmelanoma treated with adjuvant topical mitomycin C: complications and recurrences,” Ophthalmology, vol. 118, no. 9, pp. 1754–1759, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. Zehetmayer, R. Menapace, and W. Kulnig, “Combined local excision and brachytherapy with ruthenium-106 in the treatment of epibulbar malignancies,” Ophthalmologica, vol. 207, no. 3, pp. 133–139, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  7. L. Krause, A. Mladenova, N. E. Bechrakis et al., “Treatment modalities for conjunctival melanoma,” Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde, vol. 226, no. 12, pp. 1012–1016, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  8. J. A. Shields, C. L. Shields, J. E. Freire, L. W. Brady, and L. Komarnicky, “Plaque radiotherapy for selected orbital malignancies: preliminary observations—the 2002 montgomery lecture, part 2,” Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 91–95, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. H. Wuestemeyer, W. Sauerwein, D. Meller et al., “Proton radiotherapy as an alternative to exenteration in the management of extended conjunctival melanoma,” Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 244, no. 4, pp. 438–446, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. T. R. Herold and C. Hintschich, “Interferon alpha for the treatment of melanocytic conjunctivallesions,” Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 248, no. 1, pp. 111–115, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. J. F. Kirwan, P. H. Constable, I. E. Murdoch, and P. T. Khaw, “Beta irradiation: new uses for an old treatment: a review,” Eye, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 207–215, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. “Uveal melanoma 591-610,” in GEC ESTRO Handbook of Brachytherapy, R. Potter and E. van Limbergen, Eds., 2012, http://www.estro-education.org/publications/Pages/ESTROHandbooks.aspx. View at: Google Scholar
  13. P. K. Lommatzsch, “Beta irradiation of conjunctival melanomas,” Transactions of the Ophthalmological Societies of the United Kingdom, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 378–380, 1977. View at: Google Scholar
  14. P. K. Lommatzsch, “Beta-Ray treatment of malignant epibulbarmelanoma,” Albrecht von Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 209, no. 2, pp. 111–124, 1978. View at: Google Scholar
  15. L. Krause, C. Ritter, J. Wachtlin et al., “Recurrence rate following adjuvant strontium-90 brachytherapy after excision of conjunctivalmelanoma,” Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde, vol. 225, no. 7, pp. 649–652, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  16. G. Missotten, R. J. W. De Keizer, W. Spileers et al., “Strontium brachytherapy in conjunctival melanoma (abstract),” Acta Ophthalmol, vol. 89, article S248, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  17. G. Missoten, M. J. Tassignon, and R. J. X. De Kaizer, “Strontium brachytherapy in conjunctival melanoma(abstract). SBO-BOG,” 2008, http://www.ophthalmologia.be/plugins/abstracts/view_abstract.php?abs_id=1402. View at: Google Scholar
  18. J. J. Khong and J. Muecke, “Complications of mitomycin C therapy in 100 eyes with ocular surface neoplasia,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 90, no. 7, pp. 819–822, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. H. C. Russell, V. Chadha, D. Lockington, and E. G. Kemp, “Topical mitomycin C chemotherapy in the management of ocular surface neoplasia: a 10-year review of treatment outcomes and complications,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 94, no. 10, pp. 1316–1321, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. P. T. Finger, G. Czechonska, and S. Liarikos, “Topical mitomycin C chemotherapy for conjunctival melanoma and PAM with atypia,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 82, no. 5, pp. 476–479, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  21. H. Westekemper, G. Anastassiou, W. Sauerwein et al., “Analysis of ocular surface alterations following proton beam radiation in eyes with conjunctival malignant melanoma,” Ophthalmologe, vol. 103, no. 7, pp. 588–595, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Victoria M. L. Cohen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

5024 Views | 1117 Downloads | 15 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19.