Journal of Oncology

Journal of Oncology / 2021 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 |Article ID 6656337 |

Yan Du, Kai Yao, Qingbo Feng, Feiyu Mao, Zechang Xin, Peng Xu, Jie Yao, "Discovery and Validation of Circulating EVL mRNA as a Prognostic Biomarker in Pancreatic Cancer", Journal of Oncology, vol. 2021, Article ID 6656337, 11 pages, 2021.

Discovery and Validation of Circulating EVL mRNA as a Prognostic Biomarker in Pancreatic Cancer

Academic Editor: Pierfrancesco Franco
Received12 Dec 2020
Revised25 Mar 2021
Accepted04 Apr 2021
Published20 Apr 2021


Background. Circulating plasma mRNAs can be analyzed to identify putative cancer biomarkers. This study was conducted in an effort to detect plasma mRNA biomarkers capable of predicting pancreatic cancer (PACA) patient prognosis. Material and Methods. First, prognostic mRNAs that were differentially expressed in PACA in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were established, after which microarray expression profiles from PACA patient plasma samples were utilized to specifically identify potential prognostic plasma mRNA biomarkers associated with this cancer type. In total, plasma samples were then collected from 79 PACA patients and 19 healthy controls to confirm differential mRNA expression via qPCR, while Kaplan–Meier analyses were used to examine the link between mRNA expression and patient overall survival. Results. In total, three prognostic differentially expressed genes were identified in PACA patient plasma samples, including SMAP2, PTPN6, and EVL (Ena/VASP-like). Plasma EVL levels were confirmed via qPCR to be correlated with tumor pathology , while the overall survival of patients with low plasma EVL levels was poor . Multivariate Cox regression analyses further confirmed that plasma EVL levels were independent predictors of PACA patient prognosis. Conclusion. We found that PACA is associated with the downregulation of plasma EVL mRNA levels, indicating that this mRNA may be a viable biomarker associated with patient prognosis.

1. Introduction

Pancreatic cancer (PACA) is among the deadliest forms of cancer globally [1], accounting for the fourth-highest rate of cancer-related mortality in the USA with a survival rate of below 9% [2, 3]. The prognosis of PACA is generally very poor in part because tumors are asymptomatic during their early stages such that they are rarely detected until after they have metastasized, at which time patients have generally poor outcomes and a 5-year survival rate of below 3% [1].

Owing to the poor outcomes associated with this disease, there is an urgent need for the identification of novel biomarkers of localized PACA that can be used to predict tumor progression and guide timely treatment efforts. Hematological biomarkers have been identified in recent years as promising candidates capable of guiding the diagnosis and monitoring of many cancers, including PACA [47]. For example, in one clinical study, galectin-9 was shown to be highly expressed in human PACA and to be correlated with patient prognosis through an analysis of galectin-9 levels in serum samples from 70 PACA patients, 36 patients with benign pancreatic diseases, and 28 healthy controls [8]. One database study found serum LAMC2 levels to exhibit a significantly improved diagnostic utility relative to CA199 when discriminating between PACA patients, healthy controls, and individuals with benign diseases [9]. In a separate study, researchers identified a 25-component PACA serum biomarker signature through gene expression analyses of serum samples from 34 pancreatic cancer patients and 30 healthy controls [10].

Herein, we utilized The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and microarray sequencing analyses of clinical patient plasma samples to identify mRNAs associated with PACA patient prognosis. In total, we identified three mRNAs that were downregulated in PACA patient plasma and correlated with patient survival outcomes. We subsequently confirmed the prognostic relevance of plasma EVL mRNA expression levels in PACA patients by analyzing plasma samples from 79 PACA patients and 19 healthy controls.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bioinformatics Analysis

RNA sequencing data pertaining to PACA tumor tissue samples and paracancerous control tissues were downloaded from the TCGA database ( August 20, 2020). Information related to patient overall survival (OS) was obtained for all patients. The DESeq R package was then used to standardize this PACA RNA transcriptomic dataset, after which R v. x64 3.6.4 and the edgeR package were used to identify differentially expressed (DE) mRNAs associated with PACA using the following screening criteria: FC > 2 and FDR < 0.05. Kaplan–Meier analyses were used to evaluate the link between mRNA expression and patient OS using the R Survival package.

2.2. mRNA Expression Profiling

TRIzol (Takara, Japan) was used to extract total RNA from patient plasma samples, after which human protein-coding transcripts in these samples were profiled with Affymetrix Human mRNA Array 2.0 (HTA 2.0) GeneChips (Affymetrix, CA, USA) by QiMing Biotech (Shanghai, China). Briefly, rRNA was removed from plasma samples, followed by transcription and amplification to prepare full-length fluorescent cRNAs without 3′ bias. Each cRNA was then hybridized to the Affymetrix Human mRNA Array, and sample labeling and hybridization were conducted with the Affymetrix Microarray-Based Gene Expression Analysis protocol.

2.3. Microarray Data Analysis

For microarray analyses, differentially expressed genes were identified using the following criteria: |FC| > 1.5, , and FDR < 0.05. Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analyses ( were employed to assess the relationship between these differentially expressed genes and specific biological processes (BPs), cellular components (CCs), and molecular functions (MFs). Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG, enrichment analyses were also conducted to establish the enrichment of these genes in specific biological pathways.

2.4. Sample Collection

In total, 79 PACA patients and 19 healthy controls were included in this study. Plasma mRNA samples from 7 PACA patients and 3 healthy controls were subjected to plasma mRNA array profiling, after which the observed differences in plasma mRNA expression were validated using all 79 PACA patient and control samples. These samples were collected between January 2015 and September 2019 from pancreatic ductal cell carcinoma patients undergoing postoperative pathological evaluation. Patient clinicopathological characteristics were collected, and staging was performed as per the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) criteria. The most recent patient follow-up was conducted on September 30, 2020, and patient survival was calculated from the date of surgery to the date of death or most recent follow-up. All patients provided written informed consent, and the Ethics Committee of Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital approved this study.

2.5. qPCR

A StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, NY, USA) was used to conduct qPCR assays. Briefly, cDNA was prepared with a PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit. All qPCR reactions were conducted in a 20 ul volume containing 10 ng of cDNA based on provided instructions. Relative EVL expression was assessed via the 2−ΔΔCt approach, and primers used were as follows: 5′-CTCAAAGTCCGATGCCAACC-3′ (forward) and 5′-TCTTGGCCAGCAGTTTGTTC-3′ (reverse) for EVL and 5′-CTCGCTTCGGCAGCACA-3′ (forward) and 5′-AACGCTTCACGAATTTGCGT-3′ (reverse) for U6. All qPCR analyses were conducted in triplicate.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

SPSS 24.0 (Chicago, IL, USA) and Prism 7 (GraphPad Software, Inc., CA, USA) were used for statistical testing. Categorical data are given as frequencies and percentages. The link between EVL expression and patient clinicopathological characteristics was assessed via a chi-squared test, while Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients were used to gauge bivariate correlations. Kaplan–Meier survival curves and log-rank tests were used to assess patient survival. was the significance threshold.

3. Results

3.1. Identification of PACA-Related DE mRNAs in the TCGA Database

We began by comparing mRNA expression profiles between PACA patient tumor and paracancerous tissue samples in the TCGA database. In total, 823 DE mRNAs were identified in PACA tumors when comparing these two tissue types ( and FC ≥ 2.0), of which 34 were upregulated and 789 were downregulated (Figure 1(a)). Hierarchical clustering analyses clearly demonstrated that we were able to differentiate between tumor and paracancerous tissue samples based upon these DE mRNA expression profiles (Figure 1(b)).

3.2. Identification of Prognostic DE mRNAs in Patient Tissue Samples

Next, the relationship between identified DE mRNAs and PACA patient OS was evaluated using Kaplan–Meier curves and the log-rank test based upon PACA patient survival data in the TCGA database. In total, 94 DE mRNAs were found to be correlated with PACA patient prognosis.

3.3. Identification of PACA-Related DE mRNAs in Patient Plasma Tissue Samples

DE mRNAs in plasma samples from PACA and control patients were next identified using a microarray-based approach. In total, this analysis led to the identification of 2240 DE mRNAs in the plasma of PACA patients ( and FC ≥ 1.5), of which 152 and 2088 were up- and downregulated, respectively (Figures 1(c) and 1(d)). GO and KEGG enrichment analyses were conducted to assess the enrichment of these DE mRNAs in specific biological pathways, compartments, and functional classifications, with the most enriched GO and KEGG terms being shown in Figures 1(e) and 1(f), respectively.

3.4. Identification of Prognostic DE mRNAs in Patient Plasma Samples

In our TCGA analysis, we had identified 94 prognosis-related DE mRNAs. Using a Venn diagram package, we determined which of these 94 mRNAs overlapped with our list of 2240 DE mRNAs detected in PACA patient plasma samples (Figure 2(a)), ultimately leading to the identification of three prognostic DEGs in patient plasma samples: PTPN6, EVL, and SMAP2. As EVL exhibited the strongest prognostic correlation of these three genes in the TCGA patient cohort, we selected it as a target for further study.

3.5. EVL Downregulation Is Linked to PACA Patient Clinicopathological Features

We determined that EVL mRNA expression was significantly decreased in the majority of tested PACA patient plasma samples (n = 79) relative to normal control patient plasma samples (n = 19; ; Figure 2(b)). To explore the clinical significance of EVL expression (Table 1), we next interrogated the link between its expression and PACA patient clinicopathological characteristics. We determined that EVL expression was negatively correlated with PACA pathological stage and patient age , but was unrelated to patient sex, clinical stage, TNM classification, vascular invasion status, or nerve invasion status. Spearman's correlation analyses of the relationship between EVL and these parameters yielded comparable results (Table 2).

CharacteristicsEVL value (χ2 test)
Low expressionHigh expression



T classification0.417
 I, II2124
 III, IV1915

N classification0.516


Clinical stage0.260
 I, II3134
 III, IV95

Pathological differentiation0.007
 1, 21930
 3, 4219

Vessel invasion0.106

Nerve invasion0.406

EVL expression level
VariablesSpearman correlation value

Age (year)−0.2900.009
T classification−0.0910.424
N classification−0.0730.522
Clinical stage−0.1270.266
Pathological differentiation−0.3030.007
Venous invasion0.1820.108
Nervous invasion−0.0940.412

3.6. Decreased EVL Expression Is Predictive of Poor Prognosis

Using the TCGA database, we evaluated the prognostic significance of EVL expression levels in PACA. The Kaplan–Meier survival curve revealed that a low EVL expression level was associated with a poorer patient prognosis (, Figure 2(c)). In order to further verify the prognostic value of plasma EVL levels, we collected follow-up data for these 79 PACA patients, and the results of survival analyses showed EVL low expression to be associated with poorer OS in plasma samples ( Figure 2(d)). Univariate Cox regression analyses identified EVL expression , T classification , M classification , and nerve invasion as predictors of poorer PACA patient OS. A subsequent multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that EVL expression, T classification, and M classification were all independent predictors of PACA patient postoperative OS duration (all ) (Table 3).

Univariate analysisMultivariate analysis
valueRegression coefficient (SE) valueRelative risk95% confidence interval

T classification0.0092.065 (0.276)0.0371.7951.036–3.110
Metastasis0.0025.374 (0.541)0.0016.7852.253–20.428
EVL expression0.0100.508 (0.264)0.0100.4910.286–0.841

4. Discussion

PACA is a deadly cancer type that is forecast to become the second leading cancer-associated cause of mortality in the future [11]. As such, novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers associated with this disease must be identified in an effort to improve patient treatment and survival outcomes. Prior research has shown that genes that are dysregulated in PACA may offer value as prognostic or diagnostic biomarkers for patients with this cancer type [1216]. Plasma biomarkers are particularly attractive targets for patient diagnosis, staging, and monitoring as they can be assessed via a relatively noninvasive liquid biopsy approach. After being released from cells, RNA molecules form complexes with lipids that protect these RNAs from nuclease-mediated degradation [1719]. In general, cancer patients exhibit higher levels of circulating RNA than do healthy individuals owing to the higher rates of tumor cell proliferation and apoptotic death in the former cohort [20]. As such, in the present study, we sought to identify candidate plasma mRNA biomarkers capable of predicting PACA patient survival outcomes.

We began by employing a bioinformatics approach to assess PACA-related mRNA expression profiles in the TCGA database as a means of detecting potential prognostic biomarkers in these cancer patients. However, mRNAs that are differentially expressed in tumor tissues may not necessarily be differentially expressed in patient plasma samples, given that normal tissues also contribute to plasma RNA profiles and have the potential to mask tumor-derived mRNA signals in circulation [21]. By comparing our TCGA findings to the results of a microarray analysis of PACA patient plasma samples, we identified just three prognosis-related DE mRNAs in these plasma samples: PTPN6, EVL, and SMAP2.

Through further validation experiments, we confirmed that EVL mRNA expression was decreased in PACA patient plasma samples relative to samples from healthy controls. Decreased EVL mRNA expression was associated with poor OS and with tumor pathological stage and was an independent predictor of PACA patient prognosis. EVL is an Ena/VASP (enabled/vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein) family member protein involved in actin cytoskeleton regulation [22, 23]. Alterations in cytoskeletal composition can influence cellular motility, ultimately driving or suppressing tumor cell invasion and migration. Mouneimne et al. suggested that EVL downregulation was capable of suppressing tumor cell migration and invasion in vitro and in vivo, and decreased EVL expression in human tumor cells has been shown to be associated with high invasive activity, increased protrusion, decreased contractility, and reduced adhesion [24]. Grady et al. found EVL to be commonly downregulated in human colorectal cancer through a mechanism associated with altered CpG methylation upstream of EVL [25]. Li et al. found EVL mRNA expression to be decreased in cervical cancer [26]. As such, we hypothesize that EVL downregulation in PACA patients promotes disease progression via driving tumor invasion and metastasis, ultimately leading to poor patient outcomes.

5. Conclusions

In summary, we validated the prognostic value of EVL in patient plasma samples, revealing that reduced plasma EVL expression is an independent predictor of PACA patient prognosis.

Data Availability

Part of the RNA sequence dataset in the findings was taken from the TCGA public database. Other data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contributions

Yan Du and Kai Yao contributed equally to this work.


This work was supported by a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81772516).


  1. R. L. Siegel, K. D. Miller, and A. Jemal, “Cancer statistics, 2020,” CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 7–30, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. H. Tiriac, P. Belleau, D. D. Engle et al., “Organoid profiling identifies common responders to chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer,” Cancer Discovery, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 1112–1129, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. W. Chien, M. Sudo, L.-W. Ding et al., “Functional genome-wide screening identifies targets and pathways sensitizing pancreatic cancer cells to dasatinib,” Journal of Cancer, vol. 9, no. 24, pp. 4762–4773, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. T. Imamura, S. Komatsu, D. Ichikawa et al., “Liquid biopsy in patients with pancreatic cancer: circulating tumor cells and cell-free nucleic acids,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 22, no. 25, pp. 5627–5641, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. E. Llop, P. E. Guerrero, A. Duran et al., “Glycoprotein biomarkers for the detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 24, no. 24, pp. 2537–2554, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. Kato and K. Honda, “Use of biomarkers and imaging for early detection of pancreatic cancer,” Cancers (Basel), vol. 12, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. T. Kishikawa, M. Otsuka, M. Ohno et al., “Circulating RNAs as new biomarkers for detecting pancreatic cancer,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 21, no. 28, pp. 8527–8540, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. A. M. Seifert, C. Reiche, M. Heiduk et al., “Detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with galectin-9 serum levels,” Oncogene, vol. 39, no. 15, pp. 3102–3113, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. C. Yang, Z. Liu, X. Zeng et al., “Evaluation of the diagnostic ability of laminin gene family for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma,” Aging, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 3679–3703, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. C. Wingren, A. Sandström, R. Segersvärd et al., “Identification of serum biomarker signatures associated with pancreatic cancer,” Cancer Research, vol. 72, no. 10, pp. 2481–2490, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. L. Rahib, B. D. Smith, R. Aizenberg, A. B. Rosenzweig, J. M. Fleshman, and L. M. Matrisian, “Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States,” Cancer Research, vol. 74, no. 11, pp. 2913–2921, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. T. Joergensen, N. Brünner, and O. B. De Muckadell, “Comparison of circulating MMP-9, TIMP-1 and CA19-9 in the detection of pancreatic cancer,” Anticancer Research, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 587–592, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  13. H. Suh, K. Pillai, and D. L. Morris, “Mucins in pancreatic cancer: biological role, implications in carcinogenesis and applications in diagnosis and therapy,” American Journal of Cancer Research, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 1372–1383, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  14. Y. Vandenbrouck, D. Christiany, F. Combes et al., “Bioinformatics tools and workflow to select blood biomarkers for early cancer diagnosis: an application to pancreatic cancer,” Proteomics, vol. 19, Article ID e1800489, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. W.-W. Zhang, Y. Rong, Q. Liu, C.-L. Luo, Y. Zhang, and F.-B. Wang, “Integrative diagnosis of cancer by combining CTCs and associated peripheral blood cells in liquid biopsy,” Clinical and Translational Oncology, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 828–835, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. J. Cheng, Q. Tang, X. Cao, and B. Burwinkel, “Cell-Free circulating DNA integrity based on peripheral blood as a biomarker for diagnosis of cancer: a systematic review,” Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 1595–1602, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. H. Ren, Z. Chen, L. Yang et al., “Apolipoprotein C1 (APOC1) promotes tumor progression via MAPK signaling pathways in colorectal cancer,” Cancer Management and Research, vol. 11, pp. 4917–4930, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. H.-L. Ko, Y.-S. Wang, W.-L. Fong, M.-S. Chi, K.-H. Chi, and S.-J. Kao, “Apolipoprotein C1 (APOC1) as a novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for lung cancer: a marker phase I trial,” Thoracic Cancer, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 500–508, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. Z. Tang, C. Li, B. Kang, G. Gao, C. Li, and Z. Zhang, “GEPIA: a web server for cancer and normal gene expression profiling and interactive analyses,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 45, no. W1, pp. W98–w102, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. D. S. Chandrashekar, B. Bashel, S. A. H. Balasubramanya et al., “UALCAN: a portal for facilitating tumor subgroup gene expression and survival analyses,” Neoplasia, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 649–658, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. J. W.-C. Chang, C.-L. Shih, C.-L. Wang et al., “Transcriptomic analysis in liquid biopsy identifies circulating PCTAIRE-1 mRNA as a biomarker in NSCLC,” Cancer Genomics - Proteomics, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 91–100, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. O. Bournier, Y. Kroviarski, B. Rotter, G. Nicolas, M. C. Lecomte, and D. Dhermy, “Spectrin interacts with EVL (Enabled/vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein-like protein), a protein involved in actin polymerization,” Biology of the Cell, vol. 98, no. 5, pp. 279–293, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. M. Krause, E. W. Dent, J. E. Bear, J. J. Loureiro, and F. B. Gertler, “Ena/VASP proteins: regulators of the actin cytoskeleton and cell migration,” Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 541–564, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. G. Mouneimne, S. D. Hansen, L. M. Selfors et al., “Differential remodeling of actin cytoskeleton architecture by profilin isoforms leads to distinct effects on cell migration and invasion,” Cancer Cell, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 615–630, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. W. M. Grady, R. K. Parkin, P. S. Mitchell et al., “Epigenetic silencing of the intronic microRNA hsa-miR-342 and its host gene EVL in colorectal cancer,” Oncogene, vol. 27, no. 27, pp. 3880–3888, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. X.-r. Li, H.-j. Chu, T. Lv, L. Wang, S.-f. Kong, and S.-z. Dai, “miR-342-3p suppresses proliferation, migration and invasion by targeting FOXM1 in human cervical cancer,” FEBS Letters, vol. 588, no. 17, pp. 3298–3307, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2021 Yan Du et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.