Journal of Obesity

Journal of Obesity / 2014 / Article

Letter to the Editor | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 304521 |

Gary S. Goldfield, Jameason D. Cameron, Jean-Philippe Chaput, "Is Exergaming a Viable Tool in the Fight against Childhood Obesity?", Journal of Obesity, vol. 2014, Article ID 304521, 2 pages, 2014.

Is Exergaming a Viable Tool in the Fight against Childhood Obesity?

Academic Editor: Francesco Saverio Papadia
Received27 Jan 2014
Accepted11 Feb 2014
Published11 Mar 2014

In a recent issue of this journal, Lamboglia and colleagues published a review paper entitled “Exergaming as a strategic tool in the fight against childhood obesity: a systematic review” [1]. The rationale for this review was that physical activity levels among children and adolescents are very low, and time spent in sedentary behaviors, especially screen time, is very high in Westernized countries, and this is problematic given that both are known risk factors for childhood obesity and associated comorbidity. Thus, a systematic review of exergaming (also known as active video gaming) was conducted as it may represent an enjoyable way in which children can capitalize on advances in technology to increase energy expenditure and cardiovascular fitness and improve body composition to “combat childhood obesity.”

This review included 9 studies published from January 2008 to April 2012. Six of the 9 studies included were acute laboratory studies, with 3 intervention studies ranging from 12 to 28 weeks. The results indicate that exergaming increased physical activity levels, energy expenditure, maximal oxygen uptake, and heart rate and reduced sedentary screen time and waist circumference. As such, the authors concluded that “exergaming can be considered a highly relevant strategic tool for the adoption of an active and healthy lifestyle and may be useful in the fight against childhood obesity.” However, we believe that such a conclusion is premature and not supported by the current state of knowledge on this topic.

As the authors note, the systematic review included a very small number of studies, and the majority of studies (6 of the 9) were conducted in the laboratory. In the three randomized controlled intervention studies reviewed, all of which took place in the home environment, the effects of exergaming on body composition were mixed. One study found no effect on BMI [2], another showed no effect on BMI but a reduction in waist circumference [3], and a large study found small but statistically significant reductions in BMI and percent body fat [4]. Moreover, differences between intervention and control groups on volume and intensity of physical activity and time spent in seated video games were not consistently found. Given these inconsistent findings, the authors’ conclusions seem to be based on the more consistent findings of increased energy expenditure of exergaming in comparison to seated video games in the laboratory studies.

While the data from this review clearly support increased energy expenditure from exergaming in laboratory studies (relative to sitting), it is important to note these are acute effects, and since food intake was not measured in any of these studies, it is impossible to determine the net influence of exergaming on energy balance. More specifically, increases in energy expenditure from exergaming may have little impact on child obesity prevention or treatment if children compensate by increasing energy intake, which the research suggests is a common phenomenon [5]. The coupling of high energy expenditure with compensatory increases in food intake may explain why meta-analytic reviews show that exercise alone in the absence of dietary changes is ineffective in the treatment of childhood obesity [6]. Moreover, leisure time physical activity throughout the day was not measured in the laboratory studies noted by Lamboglia et al. [1]. This is a significant limitation given the research showing that acute increases in energy expenditure can be followed by compensatory decreases in leisure time physical activity in children [7, 8]. This concept is known as “activitystat” and this regulating mechanism may further explain why physical activity alone rarely leads to sustained states of negative energy balance needed for weight loss. Furthermore, a recent and more comprehensive systematic review by Active Healthy Kids Canada indicates that the acute increases in energy expenditure induced by exergaming are not sustained over time, thereby limiting the health benefits and minimizing the impact on childhood obesity [9, 10]. Taken together, we argue that the heterogeneity of the methodologies used between experiments reported in the review article by Lamboglia et al. [1] is the main limitation to the authors’ premature conclusions. In order to make population-based recommendations regarding the strategic benefits of exergaming there is a need to perform a more rigorous assessment of energy expenditure and a more precise account of energy intake, both in the laboratory and in the natural environment. In combination with such sophisticated measures of bioenergetics, it will also be imperative to disentangle the effects of frequency, intensity, and duration of these exergames, along with isolating the impact of more chronic interventions.

In conclusion, the evidence from this review supports the use of exergaming to acutely increase energy expenditure compared to seated video games. Considering that seated video games increase food intake [11], exergaming should be encouraged to replace seated video games and may be helpful in achieving recommended physical activity levels in children worldwide. However, given the mixed evidence of impact on physical activity and body composition in the intervention studies, combined with research showing that acute increases in energy expenditure can be followed by compensatory adjustments in food intake and/or leisure time energy expenditure, exergaming is unlikely to be an effective tool to combat childhood obesity. While further intervention studies of exergaming are clearly warranted (especially under naturalistic conditions), it is paramount that future research focuses on evaluating innovative but comprehensive solutions that address the complex, multifactorial etiology of childhood obesity. In the meantime, physical activity in the natural environment with associated benefits of fresh air, vitamin D, connection with nature, and meaningful social interactions should be promoted over exergaming.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


  1. C. M. Lamboglia, V. T. da Silva, J. E. de Vasconcelos Filho et al., “Exergaming as a strategic tool in the fight against childhood obesity: a systematic review,” Journal of Obesity, vol. 2013, Article ID 438364, 8 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. A. E. Maloney, T. Carter Bethea, K. S. Kelsey et al., “A pilot of a video game (DDR) to promote physical activity and decrease sedentary screen time,” Obesity, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 2074–2080, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. C. N. Mhurchu, R. Maddison, Y. Jiang, A. Jull, H. Prapavessis, and A. Rodgers, “Couch potatoes to jumping beans: a pilot study of the effect of active video games on physical activity in children,” International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, vol. 5, article 8, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. R. Maddison, L. Foley, C. Ni Mhurchu et al., “Effects of active video games on body composition: a randomized controlled trial,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 156–163, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. C. Martins, L. Morgan, and H. Truby, “A review of the effects of exercise on appetite regulation: an obesity perspective,” International Journal of Obesity, vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 1337–1347, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. L. H. Epstein and G. S. Goldfield, “Physical activity in the treatment of childhood overweight and obesity: current evidence and research issues,” Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, vol. 31, no. 11, supplement, pp. S553–S559, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  7. A. E. Frémeaux, K. M. Mallam, B. S. Metcalf, J. Hosking, L. D. Voss, and T. J. Wilkin, “The impact of school-time activity on total physical activity: the activitystat hypothesis (EarlyBird 46),” International Journal of Obesity, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 1277–1283, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. T. J. Wilkin, K. M. Mallam, B. S. Metcalf, A. N. Jeffery, and L. D. Voss, “Variation in physical activity lies with the child, not his environment: evidence for an “activitystat” in young children (EarlyBird 16),” International Journal of Obesity, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 1050–1055, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. J. P. Chaput, A. G. LeBlanc, A. McFarlane et al., “Active healthy kids Canada’s position on active video games for children and youth,” The Journal of the Canadian Paediatric Society, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 529–532, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  10. A. G. LeBlanc, J. P. Chaput, A. McFarlane et al., “Active video games and health indicators in children and youth: a systematic review,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 6, Article ID e65351, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. J.-P. Chaput, L. Klingenberg, A. Astrup, and A. M. Sjödin, “Modern sedentary activities promote overconsumption of food in our current obesogenic environment,” Obesity Reviews, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. e12–e20, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Gary S. Goldfield et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.