Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 564131, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/564131
Clinical Study

Comparison of Photopic Negative Response of Full-Field and Focal Electroretinograms in Detecting Glaucomatous Eyes

Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Iwate Medical University, 19-1 Uchimaru Morioka, Iwate 020-8505, Japan

Received 29 April 2010; Revised 24 June 2010; Accepted 22 August 2010

Academic Editor: Christopher Leung

Copyright © 2011 Shigeki Machida et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose. To compare the photopic negative response (PhNR) of the full-field electroretinogram (ERG) to the PhNR of the focal ERGs in detecting glaucoma. Methods. One hundred and three eyes with glaucoma and 42 normal eyes were studied. Full-field ERGs were elicited by red stimuli on a blue background. The focal ERGs were elicited by a white stimulus spot centered on the macula, the superotemporal or the inferotemporal areas of the macula. Results. In early glaucoma, the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were significantly larger for the focal PhNR (0.863–0.924) than those for the full-field PhNR (0.666–0.748) ( ). The sensitivity was significantly higher for the focal PhNR than for the full-field PhNR in early ( ) and intermediate glaucoma ( ). In advanced glaucoma, there was no difference in the AUCs and sensitivities between the focal and full-field PhNRs. Conclusions. The focal ERG has the diagnostic ability with higher sensitivity in detecting early and intermediate glaucoma than the full-field ERG.