Journal of Ophthalmology

Journal of Ophthalmology / 2021 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 |Article ID 9951032 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9951032

Wei Liu, Dandan Huang, Ruru Guo, Jian Ji, "Pathological Changes of the Anterior Lens Capsule", Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 2021, Article ID 9951032, 5 pages, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9951032

Pathological Changes of the Anterior Lens Capsule

Academic Editor: Edward Manche
Received09 Mar 2021
Accepted27 Apr 2021
Published04 May 2021

Abstract

The anterior lens capsule (ALC), as the thickest basement membrane in the body, is an acellular, soft, smooth, transparent membrane secreted by lens epithelial cells. The ALC has its unique biomechanical properties to serve as a barrier and separate the lens from infectious viruses and bacteria together with the posterior capsule and pericapsular membrane. However, the biomechanical and ultrastructural properties of the ALC can be changed under certain conditions. Here, we provide a brief review of the pathological changes of the ALC in several eye disorders, including cataract, aniridia, climatic droplet keratopathy, exfoliation syndrome, true exfoliation syndrome, Alport syndrome, and silicone oil tamponade.

1. Introduction

The anterior lens capsule (ALC), as the thickest basement membrane in the body, encapsulates the crystalline lens and acts as a barrier and separates the lens from infectious viruses and bacteria together with the posterior capsule and pericapsular membrane. The ALC is an acellular, soft, smooth, transparent basement membrane secreted by lens epithelial cells (LECs). The ALC with the accompanying monolayer subcapsular epithelium represents the most important metabolic element of the crystalline lens. Recently, the biomechanical properties and biomedical engineering perspectives of the ALC were reviewed by us [1]. Also, here, we provide a brief review of the pathological changes of the ALC in several eye disorders, which were never mentioned previously.

2. Pathological Changes

2.1. Cataract

Cataract is most simply defined as opacification of the crystalline lens inside the eye, which is the commonest cause of vision loss worldwide [2, 3]. Under normal physiological conditions, the ALC with the lens epithelium represents a major site of ion transport and fluid transport, which plays a vital role in maintaining lens homeostasis and transparency by providing the driving force for the ionic gradients and the fluid circulation [4, 5]. Therefore, any factor disturbing the transport processes, components or biomechanical characteristics of the ALC, and morphology or biochemistry of the lens epithelium will lead to water accumulation in the lens and the subsequent unbalance of lens homeostasis, thus resulting in cataract formation [6]. Using AFM, Choi et al. [7] found that the cataract group showed significantly lower surface roughness in the anterior side of the ALC and higher surface roughness in their posterior side than the noncataract control group. They also found lower Young’s modulus in the cataract group compared to the control group, regardless of the ALC side. Compared to nuclear cataracts, intumescent white cataracts do not have a significant difference in ALC thickness but differ in ultrastructure morphology, including extrusions at the basement membrane epithelial border, lamellation, rarefication, and filaments in the basement membrane [8].

In eyes with mature cataracts, poor fundus red reflex and poor visibility of the capsule makes surgery more challenging. Therefore, capsule staining is often performed to enable the round edges of the capsulorhexis visible and facilitate the continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (CCC) procedure. Several studies have verified that biomechanical properties of the ALC would change after vital dyes staining, including trypan blue, brilliant blue, and indocyanine green [913]. The darker and longer capsule staining that trypan blue provides is particularly advantageous, making it preferable to other agents for dye-aided cataract surgery. It has been reported that the stained capsules in human led to a decrease in elasticity and an increase in stiffness, especially in diabetic patients [13]. This effect is probably a light-dependent process and resulted from the photosensitizing action of trypan blue and light-induced collagen crosslinking of the capsule collagen because no biomechanical changes were found in porcine capsules with trypan blue staining in the absence of light or after a short illumination time of 30 seconds [12]. However, it is also reported that trypan blue application had no effect on capsule elasticity and stiffness [14]. By using a mechanized tensile strength model, Jaber et al. [15] found that there was no difference in CCC strength between trypan-blue-stained capsules and control capsules, indicating staining with trypan blue did not reduce CCC tear resistance.

2.2. Aniridia

Aniridia is characterized by underdeveloped iris and accompanied by abnormalities of the cornea, anterior chamber angle, lens, retina, and optic nerve [16, 17]. It has been discovered that the ALC from some aniridic patients is thinner and more fragile, making the capsulorhexis more challenging [17, 18]. Degenerative changes (degeneration, necrosis, and loss) and proliferative changes (proliferation and double layer) of the lens epithelium were also reported in familiar aniridia with cataract [19]. The exact cause of the thin, friable ALC in aniridia is unknown; one possibility is the absence of or diminished content in one or more of the ALC constituents.

2.3. Climatic Droplet Keratopathy

Climatic droplet keratopathy (CDK) is a corneal degeneration disease and characterized by a band‐shaped pattern of subepithelial opacities and golden‐yellow spherules [20, 21]. There is a strong association between changes of the ALC and presence of CDK. The capsule changes are usually confined to the central pupillary area, which includes a white opalescence, an elevation in front of the contour of the rest of the lens to form a plateau, and a “bag” or herniation of the lens capsule through the pupil. These ALC changes might be caused by excessive ultraviolet light exposure, which is also the main cause of CDK [22].

2.4. Exfoliation Syndrome

Exfoliation syndrome (XFS) or pseudoexfoliation syndrome is an age-related disease in which abnormal fibrillar extracellular material is produced and accumulates in many ocular tissues, mainly the ALC and the pupillary margin. The typical distribution of ALC deposits consists of three zones: a granular, often layered, peripheral zone; a central disc, and a clear area between them. Several studies confirmed fibrils accumulation above or in the basement membrane of the ALC in XFS eyes [2328], and another unknown, electron-dense, microgranular, unbound material was also observed by transmission electron microscopy beneath the lens epithelium in XFS patients [29]. By immunofluorescence and electron microscopic immunogold techniques, heparan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans, laminin, entactin/nidogen, fibronectin, and amyloid P protein were shown to be an integral constituent of XFS material [30]. The ALC thickness was reported to vary greatly measured by light microscopy, and there was no statistical difference between XFS lenses and controls [31], while with high-resolution anterior segment optical coherence tomography, the ALC was found to be thicker in XFS patients than normal people [32]. The ALC ultrastructural abnormalities (diffuse intracellular and extracelluar edema, transparent vacuoles, apoptotic cells, and destroyed epithelial cells) were also found to be more extended and more frequently observed in XFS patients than cataract controls [33]. XFS can be unilateral or bilateral, but exfoliation material can also be found in the unaffected eyes of patients with clinically unilateral XFS [34, 35]. If capsule staining (i.e., trypan blue) is needed, lower concentration and/or exposure is recommended because the ALC has more affinity to trypan blue in XFS patients [36].

2.5. True Exfoliation Syndrome

True exfoliation syndrome (TEX) is a rare disorder in which characteristic lamellar separation of the ALC occurs. The pathogenesis of TEX is not clear; although intense infrared radiation is thought to be the main causative factor, most cases are idiopathic. Histologically, a thickened delaminated structure, perpendicular fibrils and vesicular degeneration in the capsule, and degenerative lens epithelium have been documented [37]. Recently, double delamination and pigment deposition on the detached membrane are reported to be new findings in TEX patients [38].

2.6. Alport Syndrome

Alport syndrome is a rare disorder of the basement membrane characterized clinically by progressive hereditary nephritis, sensorineural hearing loss, and ocular abnormalities. Genetically, Alport syndrome is due to mutations involving the coding for type IV collagen resulting in a defective synthesis of type IV collagen [39]. Clinically, the typical ocular manifestations of Alport syndrome are a flecked retinopathy and bilateral anterior lenticonus, which is resulted from the conical protrusion of the lens anteriorly through the thinnest and weakest part of the capsule [39]. Several electron microscopic studies have demonstrated the marked thinning and vertical dehiscence of ALC in Alport syndrome [4043]. Spontaneous rupture of the ALC was also reported, which is suggestive of defective capsular strength [44, 45]. By using the lens capsule of wild-type and Alport syndrome mice as a model, the osmotic swelling experiments from the work of Gyoneva et al. [46] revealed direction-dependent changes. They found Alport lenses strained significantly more than wild-type lenses in the anterior-posterior direction, which is consistent with clinical data: Alport patients develop conical protrusions on the anterior and posterior lenticular poles.

2.7. Silicone Oil Tamponade

Silicone oil is an intraocular tamponade after vitrectomy surgery, which is used for the treatment of complicated retinal detachment [47]. However, intravitreal silicone oil can lead to several complications including cataract, glaucoma, band keratopathy, oil emulsification [48, 49], and ALC changes.

In Citirik et al.’s study, by electron microscopy, silicone oil was detected on the posterior surface of the ALC in 50% cases and surface irregularities, pits, and depressions were present in the posterior surface of the ALC in all the ten silicone oil tamponade cases [50]. Ultrastructural effects of silicone oil on the ALC of the clear crystalline lens of myopic eyes were also studied [51]. Light microscopic examination showed relatively more flat cells with irregular outline of LECs with wide intercellular spaces, deeply stained nuclei, and multiple intracytoplasmic vacuoles. Collagenous surfaces filled with multiple pits, depressions, and abnormal deposits were found under scanning electron microscopy, while transmission electron microscopy revealed LECs with apoptotic changes, cytoplasmic vacuoles, and filopodia-like protrusions between LECs and the capsule [51]. In the ALC of rabbit eyes with silicone oil tamponade, many vacuoles amid matrix accumulation were present on the posterior surface, suggesting the deposition of emulsified silicone oil droplets [52], which is similar to the histopathological findings of human eyes [53].

Clinically, rigidity of the ALC is frequently encountered during cataract surgery in silicone-oil-filled eyes [54], which increases the mechanical difficulties of anterior capsulorrhexis. The anterior subcapsular tissue plaque resulted from silicone oil tamponade may be responsible for the increased mechanical resistance of the ALC [55].

The different pathological changes of the ALC in different diseases are summarized in Table 1.


DiseaseMain changes

CataractLower surface roughness in the anterior side of the ALC and higher surface roughness in their posterior side
Lower Young’s modulus
Ultrastructure morphology changes in intumescent white cataracts
Trypan blue stainingDecrease in elasticity and an increase in stiffness
No difference in CCC strength
AniridiaThinner and more fragile
Degenerative changes (degeneration, necrosis, and loss) and proliferative changes (proliferation and double layer) of the lens epithelium
Climatic droplet keratopathyPlateau or “bag” or herniation-like of the lens capsule
Exfoliation syndromeAbnormal fibrillar extracellular material deposition
Diffuse intracellular and extracelluar edema, transparent vacuoles, apoptotic cells, and destroyed epithelial cells
More affinity to trypan blue
True exfoliation syndromeThickened delaminated structure, perpendicular fibrils, and vesicular degeneration in the ALC
Double delamination and pigment deposition on the detached membrane
Alport syndromeMarked thinning and vertical dehiscence of the ALC
Spontaneous rupture of the ALC
Silicone oil tamponadeSurface irregularities, pits, and depressions in the posterior surface of the ALC
LECs with apoptotic changes and cytoplasmic vacuoles
Increased mechanical resistance of the ALC

ALC: anterior lens capsule; CCC: continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis; LECs: lens epithelium cells.

3. Conclusions

The ALC, as structural support for the lens within the eye, plays an important role on normal lens growth and metabolism. However, the biomechanical properties of the ALC may change in several ocular diseases, including cataract, aniridia, climatic droplet keratopathy, exfoliation syndrome, true exfoliation syndrome, Alport syndrome, and silicone oil tamponade. These pathological changes vary from biomechanical alterations (surface roughness, Young’s modulus, elasticity, stiffness, rigidity, fragility, etc.) to ultrastructural abnormalities (increase or decrease in thickness, abnormal material accumulation, lamellar separation, vesicular degeneration, ALC dehiscence, surface irregularities, cytoplasmic vacuoles, etc.) in different ocular diseases. If cataract surgery is scheduled for these eyes, the surgery procedure, especially the capsulorhexis, would be challenging. Therefore, attention should be raised when performing cataract surgery for these patients.

Data Availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare to have no potential conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81800825), Tianjin Clinical Key Discipline Project (grant no. TJLCZDXKQ023), and Open Project of Tianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases (grant no. 2020tjswmq003). The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. D. Huang, C. Xu, R. Guo, J. Ji, and W. Liu, “Anterior lens capsule: biomechanical properties and biomedical engineering perspectives,” Acta Ophthalmologica, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. J. Thompson and N. Lakhani, “Cataracts,” Primary Care: Clinics in Office Practice, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 409–423, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. P. Asbell, I. Dualan, J. Mindel, D. Brocks, M. Ahmad, and S. Epstein, “Age-related cataract,” The Lancet, vol. 365, no. 9459, pp. 599–609, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. J. Fischbarg, F. P. J. Diecke, K. Kuang et al., “Transport of fluid by lens epithelium,” American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology, vol. 276, no. 3, pp. C548–C557, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. J. F. Hejtmancik, S. A. Riazuddin, R. McGreal, W. Liu, A. Cvekl, and A. Shiels, “Lens biology and biochemistry,” Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science, vol. 134, pp. 169–201, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. Q. Yan, J. I. Clark, T. N. Wight, and E. H. Sage, “Alterations in the lens capsule contribute to cataractogenesis in SPARC-null mice,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 115, no. 13, pp. 2747–2756, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  7. S. Choi, H.-J. Lee, Y. Cheong et al., “AFM study for morphological characteristics and biomechanical properties of human cataract anterior lens capsules,” Scanning, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 247–256, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. M. Hawlina, S. Stunf, and A. Hvala, “Ultrastructure of anterior lens capsule of intumescent white cataract,” Acta Ophthalmologica, vol. 89, no. 4, pp. e367–e370, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. C. Simsek and O. Gokmen, “The effects of vıtal dyes on mechanıcal propertıes of the human anterıor lens capsule,” Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 66–70, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. C. Haritoglou, S. Mauell, R. G. Schumann et al., “Increase in lens capsule stiffness caused by vital dyes,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 1749–1752, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. G. Wollensak and E. Spoerl, “Influence of indocyanine green staining on the biomechanical properties of porcine anterior lens capsule,” Current Eye Research, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 413–417, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. G. Wollensak, E. Spörl, and D.-T. Pham, “Biomechanical changes in the anterior lens capsule after trypan blue staining,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 1526–1530, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. B. H. Dick, S. E. Aliyeva, and F. Hengerer, “Effect of trypan blue on the elasticity of the human anterior lens capsule,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 1367–1373, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. C. Simsek, S. Oto, G. Yilmaz, D. D. Altinors, A. Akman, and S. G. Gungor, “Comparison of the mechanical properties of the anterior lens capsule in senile cataract, senile cataract with trypan blue application, and pseudoexfoliation syndrome,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 1054–1061, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. R. Jaber, L. Werner, S. Fuller et al., “Comparison of capsulorhexis resistance to tearing with and without trypan blue dye using a mechanized tensile strength model,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 507–512, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. I. Ivanov, A. Shuper, M. Shohat, M. Snir, and R. Weitz, “Aniridia: recent achievements in paediatric practice,” European Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 154, no. 10, pp. 795–800, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. H. Lee, R. Khan, and M. O’Keefe, “Aniridia: current pathology and management,” Acta Ophthalmologica, vol. 86, no. 7, pp. 708–715, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. S. Schneider, R. H. Osher, S. E. Burk, T. B. Lutz, and R. Montione, “Thinning of the anterior capsule associated with congenital aniridia,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 523–525, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. Z. Q. Hou, Y. S. Hao, W. Wang, Z. Z. Ma, Y. F. Zhong, and S. J. Song, “Clinical pathological study of the anterior lens capsule abnormalities in familial congenital aniridia with cataract,” Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 494–497, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  20. C. S. Matta, K. F. Tabbara, J. A. Cameron, A. A. Hidayat, and A. A. al-Rajhi, “Climatic droplet keratopathy with corneal amyloidosis,” Ophthalmology, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 192–195, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. R. H. Gray, G. J. Johnson, and A. Freedman, “Climatic droplet keratopathy,” Survey of Ophthalmology, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 241–253, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. G. Johnson, D. Minassian, and S. Franken, “Alterations of the anterior lens capsule associated with climatic keratopathy,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 229–234, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. K. N. Sorkou, M. E. Manthou, S. Meditskou, N. Ziakas, and I. T. Tsinopoulos, “Exfoliation fibrils within the basement membrane of anterior lens capsule: a transmission electron microscopy study,” Current Eye Research, vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 882–886, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. T. T. Kivelä, “Histopathology of exfoliation syndrome,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. S38–s43, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. J. C. Morrison and W. R. Green, “Light microscopy of the exfoliation syndrome,” Acta Ophthalmologica, vol. 66, no. 184, pp. 5–27, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. Z. Sbeity, P. M. Palmiero, C. Tello, J. M. Liebmann, and R. Ritch, “Noncontact in vivo confocal laser scanning microscopy of exfoliation syndrome,” Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society, vol. 106, pp. 46–55, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  27. R. Ritch, “Ocular findings in exfoliation syndrome,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. S67–s71, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. J. H. Seland, “The ultrastructural changes in the exfoliation syndrome,” Acta Ophthalmologica, vol. 66, no. 184, pp. 28–34, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. K. N. Sorkou, M.-E. Manthou, K. T. Tsaousis, P. Brazitikos, and I. T. Tsinopoulos, “Transmission electron microscopy study of undescribed material at the anterior lens capsule in exfoliation syndrome,” Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 256, no. 9, pp. 1631–1637, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. U. Schlötzer-Schrehardt, S. Dörfler, and G. O. H. Naumann, “Immunohistochemical localization of basement membrane components in pseudoexfoliation material of the lens capsule,” Current Eye Research, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 343–355, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. J. Ruotsalainen and A. Tarkkanen, “Capsule thickness of cataractous lenses with and without exfoliation syndrome,” Acta Ophthalmologica, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 444–449, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. M. Batur, E. Seven, S. Tekin, and T. Yasar, “Anterior lens capsule and Iris thicknesses in pseudoexfoliation syndrome,” Current Eye Research, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 1445–1449, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. K. Sorkou, M. E. Manthou, N. Ziakas, K. T. Tsaousis, and I. T. Tsinopoulos, “Severe abnormalities of lens epithelial cells in exfoliation syndrome: a transmission electron microscopy study of patients with age-related cataract,” Medicina (Kaunas), vol. 55, no. 6, p. 235, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. Z. Sbeity, P.-M. Palmiero, C. Tello, J. M. Liebmann, and R. Ritch, “Non-contact in vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy in exfoliation syndrome, exfoliation syndrome suspect and normal eyes,” Acta Ophthalmologica, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 241–247, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. P. Parekh, W. R. Green, W. J. Stark, and E. K. Akpek, “Electron microscopic investigation of the lens capsule and conjunctival tissues in individuals with clinically unilateral pseudoexfoliation syndrome,” Ophthalmology, vol. 115, no. 4, pp. 614–619, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. H. Hosseini, M. H. Nowroozzadeh, M. R. Razeghinejad, H. Ashraf, R. Salouti, and M. J. Ashraf, “Anterior lens capsule has more affinity to trypan blue in patients with pseudoexfoliation,” Eye, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 1245-1246, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. C. Teekhasaenee, “Current concepts in true exfoliation syndrome,” Journal of Glaucoma, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. S105–s110, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. C. Teekhasaenee, Y. Suwan, W. Supakontanasan, W. Tulvatana, and R. Ritch, “The clinical spectrum and a new theory of pathogenesis of true exfoliation syndrome,” Ophthalmology, vol. 123, no. 11, pp. 2328–2337, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. J. Savige, S. Sheth, A. Leys, A. Nicholson, H. G. Mack, and D. Colville, “Ocular features in Alport syndrome: pathogenesis and clinical significance,” Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 703–709, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. S. Sonarkhan, M. Ramappa, S. Chaurasia, and K. Mulay, “Bilateral anterior lenticonus in a case of Alport syndrome: a clinical and histopathological correlation after successful clear lens extraction,” BMJ Case Reports, vol. 2014, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. A. K. Junk, F. H. Stefani, and K. Ludwig, “Bilateral anterior lenticonus: scheimpflug imaging system documentation and ultrastructural confirmation of Alport syndrome in the lens capsule,” Archives of Ophthalmology (Chicago, III: 1960), vol. 118, no. 7, pp. 895–897, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  42. M. Citirik, C. Batman, G. Men, M. Tuncel, and O. Zilelioglu, “Electron microscopic examination of the anterior lens capsule in a case of Alport’s syndrome,” Clinical & Experimental Optometry, vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 367–370, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. J. H. Choi, K. S. Na, S. H. Bae, and G. H. Roh, “Anterior lens capsule abnormalities in Alport syndrome,” Korean Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 84–89, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. K. Trifonova, G. Jordanoff, V. Stoyanov, and K. Slaveykov, “Spontaneous anterior lens capsule rupture of a patient with Alport syndrome—a case report,” Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 974–977, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. M. Lohchab and R. Arora, “Bilateral spontaneous lens capsule rupture in Alport’s syndrome,” Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 67, no. 3, p. 406, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. L. Gyoneva, Y. Segal, K. D. Dorfman, and V. H. Barocas, “Mechanical response of wild-type and Alport murine lens capsules during osmotic swelling,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 113, pp. 87–91, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. H. H. Ghoraba, A. G. Zaky, H. M. Abd Al Fatah, E. E. D. M. El Gemai, and M. A. Heikal, “Sticky silicone oil,” Retina, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 1599–1606, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. S. Baillif and P. Gastaud, “Complications of silicone oil tamponade,” Journal Français d’Ophtalmologie, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 259–265, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. K. G. Riedel, V.-P. Gabel, L. Neubauer, A. Kampik, and O.-E. Lund, “Intravitreal silicone oil injection: complications and treatment of 415 consecutive patients,” Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 228, no. 1, pp. 19–23, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. M. Citirik, M. F. Sargon, S. Has, and S. Bilgin, “Alterations of the anterior lens capsule in vitrectomized eyes with silicone oil tamponade,” Ophthalmic Surgery, Lasers and Imaging Retina, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 388–394, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. W. Soliman, M. Sharaf, K. Abdelazeem, D. El-Gamal, and A. Nafady, “Ultrastructural effects of silicone oil on the clear crystalline lens of the human eye,” European Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 566–572, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. T. Miyamoto, S. Saika, A. Yamanaka, Y. Okada, and Y. Ohnishi, “Deposition of silicone oil droplets in the residual anterior lens capsule after vitrectomy and lensectomy in rabbits,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 703–707, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. S. Saika, T. Miyamoto, T. Tanaka, Y. Ohnishi, A. Ooshima, and W. Kimura, “Histopathology of anterior lens capsules in vitrectomized eyes with tamponade by silicone oil,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 376–378, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. C.-W. Yung, A. Oliver, J. M. Bonnin, and H. Gao, “Modified anterior capsulotomy technique and histopathology of the anterior capsule in cataracts after prolonged exposure to intravitreal silicone oil,” Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 2020–2023, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. F. H. J. Koch, A. Cusumano, P. Seifert, M. Mougharbel, and A. J. Augustin, “Ultrastructure of the anterior lens capsule after vitrectomy with silicone oil injection. correlation of clinical and morphological features,” Documenta Ophthalmologica, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 233–242, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2021 Wei Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views92
Downloads147
Citations

Related articles