Journal of Pharmaceutics

Journal of Pharmaceutics / 2013 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 875906 | 8 pages |

Biological Atomic Force Microscopy for Imaging Gold-Labeled Liposomes on Human Coronary Artery Endothelial Cells

Academic Editor: Venkata Vamsi Krishna Venuganti
Received28 Nov 2012
Accepted18 Jan 2013
Published21 Feb 2013


Although atomic force microscopy (AFM) has been used extensively to characterize cell membrane structure and cellular processes such as endocytosis and exocytosis, the corrugated surface of the cell membrane hinders the visualization of extracellular entities, such as liposomes, that may interact with the cell. To overcome this barrier, we used 90 nm nanogold particles to label FITC liposomes and monitor their endocytosis on human coronary artery endothelial cells (HCAECs) in vitro. We were able to study the internalization process of gold-coupled liposomes on endothelial cells, by using AFM. We found that the gold-liposomes attached to the HCAEC cell membrane during the first 15–30 min of incubation, liposome cell internalization occurred from 30 to 60 min, and most of the gold-labeled liposomes had invaginated after 2 hr of incubation. Liposomal uptake took place most commonly at the periphery of the nuclear zone. Dynasore monohydrate, an inhibitor of endocytosis, obstructed the internalization of the gold-liposomes. This study showed the versatility of the AFM technique, combined with fluorescent microscopy, for investigating liposome uptake by endothelial cells. The 90 nm colloidal gold nanoparticles proved to be a noninvasive contrast agent that efficiently improves AFM imaging during the investigation of biological nanoprocesses.

1. Introduction

The development of biologically active nanoparticles that can facilitate the delivery of therapeutic and/or diagnostic agents to precise regions within the human body has gained widespread attention in the past 10 years. While many have successfully designed and tested such nanovectors in vivo, little is known about how these particles dynamically interact with cell membranes. Atomic force microscopy (AFM), a surface analytical technique that generates nanoscale topographical images under physiological-like conditions [1], combined with fluorescence microscopy is an attractive tool for characterizing nanoparticle-cell membrane interactions and may afford the opportunity to image biological processes, such as cellular endocytosis of nanovectors and reorganization of the cytoskeleton, in real time.

Liposomes were one of the first classes of engineered nanoparticles to be used to deliver drugs within the human body. One of the major disadvantages of using standard liposome formulations is their rapid clearance from circulation due to uptake by the reticuloendothelial system. To resolve this problem, long-circulating liposomes were developed in the early 1990s [2, 3]. Long-circulating liposomes have polyethylene glycol (PEG) derivatives attached to their surfaces. The conformational flexibility of PEG chains creates a sterical barrier that allows the liposomes to evade uptake by the reticuloendothelial system and remain in circulation for a longer time, increasing the possibility for targeting [4]. The ability to pegylate liposomes, for the purpose of mitigating a systemic immune response and/or enhancing prolonged vascular circulation, has made these particles attractive nanovectors for increasing the efficacy of therapeutics. For instance, Doxil entraps doxorubicin (an anthracycline antibiotic used as a chemotherapy agent) within a pegylated liposome for treating Kaposi’s sarcoma [5].

Our laboratory is designing liposomes that are immunospecific to inflamed endothelium, a hallmark of atherosclerosis, for the purpose of imaging lipid-rich plaques before the onset of clinical symptoms (e.g., angina, coronary stenosis, etc.). While in vivo studies of liposomes plaque specificity (imaged by computed tomography) are currently underway, we are also determining how these liposomes interact with endothelial cells that have been induced to express an inflammatory response.

Structure recognition can be a challenge during AFM imaging. Some nanoparticles can also be used as imaging contrast agents and as reinforcement elements to improve visual enhancement [6]. Colloidal gold has excellent detection capabilities for single-molecule tracking [7, 8]. The aim of this project was to standardize the use of gold nanoparticles as a nontoxic means to detect pegylated liposomes by AFM, on the membranes of live human coronary artery endothelial cells (HCAECs), to elucidate internalization processes.

2. Experimental Methods

2.1. Materials

1,2-Dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DPPC); cholesterol; 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-N-[carboxy (polyethyleneglycol) 2000] (DSPE-PEG (2000)-COOH); and 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-N-[methoxy (polyethyleneglycol)-2000] (DSPE-PEG (2000)) were purchased from Avanti Polar Lipids (Alabaster, AL, USA). N-(Fluorescein-5-thiocarbamoyl)-1,2-dihexa-decanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (DHPE-FITC) was purchased from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR, USA). Dimethyl sulfoxide anhydrous 99.9% (DMSO), N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-N′-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC), chloroform A.C.S. reagent 99.8% with amylenes as stabilizer, 2-(N-morpholino) ethanesulfonic acid (MES), collagen from calf skin, neutralbuffered formalin 10%, and dynasore monohydrate were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). N-Hydroxysulfosuccinimide (sulfo-NHS) was purchased from Pierce (Rockford, IL, USA). Amine-PEG conjugated spherical gold nanoparticles (90-nm gold nanoparticles) were purchased from Nanopartz (Salt Lake City, UT, USA). HCAECs (CC-2585 Lot # EN000307), endothelial cell basal medium-2 (EBM-2), and the endothelial cell growth medium (EGM-2) BulletKit (SingleQuots) were purchased from Lonza (Walkersville, MD, USA). Eight-well Lab-Tek Chamber Permanox Slides were purchased from Nalge Nunc Int. (Rochester, NY, USA). Ruby red mica sheets ( ), for liposome AFM imaging, were purchased from Electron Microscopy Sciences (Hatfield, PA, USA). AFM cantilevers for tapping mode (RTESP, = 262–325 kHz, = 20–80 N/m) and contact mode (DNP-S, = 12–24 kHz,  N/m) were purchased from Bruker Corporation (formerly Veeco Metrology) (Santa Barbara, CA, USA).

2.2. Preparation of Long-Circulating Liposomes

We synthesized long-circulating liposomes by using DPPC and our previously published procedure [9]. The liposomes were composed of DPPC and cholesterol in a 3 : 1 molar ratio. The linker lipid DSPE-PEG (2000)-COOH was incorporated at a molar ratio of 3 : 1 : 0.3, DPPC : cholesterol : linker. The synthesized liposomes were sterically stabilized by addition of a 1% solution of DSPE-PEG (2000) in chloroform. For fluorescence microscopy experiments, 2 mol% of fluorescently labeled DHPE-FITC was incorporated into the lipid mixture. The liposomes were prepared by hydration of the dry lipid film as described by others [10, 11]. Briefly, the lipids were dissolved in chloroform, which was then carefully evaporated with a rotary evaporator (Büchi Corporation). The resulting dry lipid film was hydrated at with MES (100 mM, pH 5.5) to a final phospholipid concentration of 30 mM. Vigorous shaking of the solution produced large multilamellar vesicles of various sizes. Using an extruder (Avanti Polar Lipids), we passed the multilamellar vesicle solution 21 times through 0.2 μm polycarbonate membranes at to yield a homogeneous solution of unilamellar vesicles with an average diameter of 129 nm, as determined by dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements.

2.3. Dynamic Light Scattering Measurements

DLS is one of the most common techniques to determine the radius of spherical particles in Brownian motion in a solution [12]. The size distribution of the liposomes was measured with a DLS Malvern Nano-ZS Zetasizer (Malvern Instruments Ltd.; Malvern, Worcestershire, UK). The Zetasizer was loaded with a liposome solution ratio 1 : 200 (70 μM) in 1X phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) solution and ran 13 cycles to obtain a measurement. This instrument is also used to obtain the zeta potential charge. DPPC liposomes have a resultant negative potential of −11.4 mV, indicating that the liposomes are stable and that they resist aggregation. Data were analyzed using the Dispersion Technology Software version 4.20 (Malvern Instruments Ltd.).

2.4. Preparation of Long-Circulating Gold-Liposomes

Conjugated spherical gold nanoparticles with a diameter of 90 nm (Nanopartz) were covalently linked to the long-circulating liposomes for AFM detection. “Gold-liposomes” were prepared by attaching the gold nanoparticles at the distal terminals of DSPE-PEG (2000)-COOH linker lipids, which have free carboxylic groups available for activation [9, 13]. After the dry lipid hydration and liposome isolation procedures described above, 300 μL of the 30 mM liposome solution was incubated with the activating reagents EDC (9 mg) and sulfo-NHS (11 mg) for 4 hrs at room temperature. The free activating reagents were then removed by dialysis through a 6,000–8,000 MW cut-off membrane against PBS (pH 7.4). Then, 100 μL of gold nanoparticles was added to 400 μL of the activated liposome solution and incubated overnight at room temperature. The unbounded gold nanoparticles were removed by dialysis through a 500,000 MW cut-off membrane against PBS (pH 7.4), and the average size of the “gold-liposomes” was measured by DLS.

2.5. Atomic Force Microscopy
2.5.1. Liposome Imaging

The liposomes were deposited on mica for AFM analysis by using a modification of the procedure of Ramachandran et al. [14]. Ruby red mica circles (11 mm diameter) were first glued to a glass slide with Scotch super glue gel. Both uncoupled liposomes and gold-coupled liposomes were left to stand on freshly cleaved mica during 10 min. The liposomes were then fixed with 10% neutral buffered formalin for 10 min, washed 3 times with ultrapure water (Barnstead water system, Thermo Scientific; Dubuque, IA, USA), and dried in a sterilGARD III hood flow before scanning. AFM liposome imaging was performed in tapping mode in air with RTESP cantilevers ( = 262–325 kHz, = 20–80 N/m).

2.5.2. Cell Imaging

For the endocytosis studies,  cells/well of HCAECs were seeded in a collagen-(50 μg/mL) coated 8-well slide system, with EBM-2 supplemented with an EGM-2 Bulletkit (SingleQuots) to obtain 80% confluence after 24 hr of incubation at in a 5% C atmosphere. The cells were then treated with the gold-labeled liposomes at a final concentration of 1.525 mM (solution ratio 1 : 10 in culture medium) for four different incubation times (15, 30, 60, and 120 min) at . During the incubations, the slide chambers were agitated at 30 rpm with an Orbit P4 Digital Shaker (Labnet, Edison, NJ, USA). The cells were then washed 3 times with culture medium to remove unbounded liposomes and fixed for 15 min with 10% neutral buffered formalin.

AFM studies were performed on “never-dried” fixed cells, after the four incubation periods, to investigate liposome-membrane interactions. Liquid scanning was performed in contact mode with DNP-S cantilevers ( = 12–24 kHz,  N/m). AFM was performed with a BioScope II Controller (Bruker Corporation). Image analysis was conducted with the Research NanoScope software version 7.30. For routine liposome detection, we used a Nikon TE2000-E inverted optical fluorescence microscope (Nikon Instruments, Inc. Lewisville, TX, USA) integrated to the bioscope system. Epifluorescence images were taken using an FITC-HYQ filter set (excitation 460–500 wavelengths) with 20 and 40X objectives, respectively. The cells that emitted a positive fluorescent signal by the FITC-labeled liposomes were selected for AFM scanning. The results from the liposome AFM measurements were also verified by DLS analysis.

2.6. Inhibition of Endocytosis

The effect of dynasore monohydrate on cellular uptake of liposomes was also investigated. Dynasore monohydrate is a GTPase inhibitor that targets dynamin and blocks endocytosis [15, 16]. Dynamin has an essential role of vesicle formation in receptor-mediated endocytosis [17, 18]. The dynasore monohydrate was initially diluted to 20 mM in DMSO (99.9%) and stored in 20-μL aliquots at − . At the time of the experiments, it was diluted to 80 μM (0.4% DMSO) in EBM-2 that contained no serum or albumin [19]. The HCAECs were then treated with dynasore monohydrate (80 μM) for 15 min and agitated at 30 prm at before being incubated for 60 min with gold-labeled liposomes diluted 1 : 10 (1.525 mM) in EBM-2 supplemented with the EGM-2 BulletKit. We chose to investigate dynasore monohydrate’s blocking effect after 60 min of incubation because, as described later, we learned that the “gold liposomes” had been taken up by the cells at that point in time. This is also in agreement with the work of Mastrobattista et al. [20], who reported that the 60% of cell-bound immunoliposomes are taken up by bronchial epithelial cells within 1 h of incubation.

3. Results and Discussion

Our initial attempts to monitor the endocytosis of FITC liposomes by HCAECs required the utilization of an imaging contrast agent to improve visual enhancement during AFM scanning. FITC-labeled liposomes were not detectable during AFM imaging when incubated with HCAECs (see Figure in Supplementry Materials avalible online at Positive fluorescence signaling was detected from the fluorescently labeled lipid, but uncoupled liposomes were not detectable on the surface of the cell membrane during AFM scanning. This difficulty led us to use colloidal gold to perform single-molecule tracking, a common technique practiced in morphological studies [7, 8]. For this reason, 90 nm gold particles were coupled to FITC-labeled liposomes to facilitate particle identification in AFM profiles.

3.1. Characterization of Uncoupled Liposomes and Gold-Coupled Liposomes
3.1.1. DLS Measurements

The average diameter of the non-gold-coupled liposomes, as determined by DLS, was  nm (Figure 1(a)), and a polydispersity index (PDI) of 0.126. The DLS results represent the averages of three different measurements (13 runs each) per sample. For the gold-coupled liposomes (Figure 1(b)), the DLS results showed a major peak at  nm. The PDI for the gold-liposomes was 0.689.

The polydispersity index indicates the variation in particle size. Its denomination can vary from 0 to 1. A value of 1 means that the sample is very polydisperse and a value of 0 means that the particle size does not vary. Values below 0.2 indicate that a sample is monodisperse [21, 22]. Therefore, the PDI values reported here indicate that the noncoupled liposomes were very monodisperse. However, the gold-coupled liposomes had a more heterogeneous formulation, some containing only one or two gold particles and some having many (clusters).

3.1.2. AFM Analysis of Liposomes

The structural properties of uncoupled and gold-coupled liposomes were analyzed using AFM. Both types of liposomes were imaged after fixation with 10% formalin to ensure the preservation of their original structure. AFM was performed in tapping mode in air with RTESP cantilevers. Figure 2 shows a typical AFM image of non-gold-coupled liposomes deposited on fresh cleaved mica and fixed with formalin. AFM analysis of these liposomes showed an average diameter of  nm. This result was comparable to the diameter measurement obtained by DLS (  nm).

To enhance AFM imaging, nanogold particles were covalently linked to FITC liposomes. We choose 90 nm gold particles to facilitate visualization within the cell membrane taking into consideration that ~120 nm gold nanoparticles are normally used for thermal ablation. Figure 3 shows AFM imaging of the geometric structure of a typical gold-liposome cluster (303 nm in size) consisting of three distinctive particles with individual diameters of 95, 86, and 80 nm.

According to DLS measurements, these gold-liposome complexes had an average size of  nm (3 different measurements with 13 runs each). The arrangement and geometrical structure of the gold-liposome clusters changed, but the average size remained similar in different formulations ( ).

3.2. Endocytosis and Liposome Coupling

The surface topology and characteristics of biological membranes can routinely be described using biological AFM instruments [23, 24]. Nevertheless, the application of this technique has rarely been approached to resolve kinetics for liposome cell uptake. To investigate how endocytosis takes place within endothelial cells, we used 90 nm gold particles to track FITC-labeled liposomes. Figure 4 shows sequential AFM images illustrating how the “gold-liposomes” internalize the plasma membrane.

After 15 min of incubation (Figures 4(a) and 4(b)), some of the coupled liposomes were already attached to the cells. They still quivered when probed with the AFM tip during scanning (seen as liposome drifting in Figure 4(a)). Nevertheless, the “gold-liposomes” were strongly bonded to the cell membrane at this time, given that the liposomes remained attached to the cell when probed. At 30 min, the liposome clusters started to enter the cells (not shown). Actual endocytosis was seen in samples incubated for 60 min (Figures 4(c) and 4(d)). Figures 4(c) and 4(d) clearly show how the plasma membrane is enclosing the extracellular material and gradually engulfing it (see also Figure 5(a), at a smaller scan area). The corresponding fluorescence images in Figures 4(d) and 5(b) show strong positive signals of the two “gold-liposome” clusters (indicated by arrows) that were selected for AFM scanning. One of these clusters was about 3.2 μm and the other was 3.8 μm in diameter. Liposomes incubated with HCAECs for 120 min were almost completely internalized (Figure 4(e)).

These studies demonstrated that using colloidal gold nanoparticles as an image-enhancement tool did not hinder endocytosis and that uptake of the liposomes took place in 120 min. The time course of the endocytosis can be summarized as follows: liposome attachment to the plasma membrane (15–30 min), internalization (30–60 min), and liposome uptake completed (120 min). These results agree with the findings reported by Ramachandran et al. [14], who studied endocytosis of cisplatin-encapsulated liposomes. In that study, the cisplatin produced liposomes significantly stiffer than nonencapsulated liposomes, which facilitated their detection by AFM scanning.

On the other hand, our negative controls (HCAEC incubated with “gold-liposomes” for 60 and 120 min, which did not show signals detectable by fluorescence imaging) had smooth and even membrane surfaces (Figures 5(c) and 5(d)). Signs of elevated or raised areas were not present during AFM scanning, and the lack of fluorescence signaling indicated the absence of FITC-labeled gold-liposomes.

3.3. Blocking Gold-Liposome Uptake

Endocytosis is the process that cells use to take up nanovectors and other materials from the external environment, by encapsulating them in vesicles made from invaginations in the cell plasma membrane. It was of particular interest to investigate if the internalization of the gold-coupled liposomes could be hindered by a typical inhibitor of endocytosis. We used dynasore, a cell permeable, noncompetitive dynamin GTPase activity inhibitor, to block dynamin-dependent endocytosis of the liposomes (Figure 6). Our experiments indicated that the “gold-liposome” clusters barely attached to the external walls of cells treated 15 min with 80 μM dynasore and then incubated with the “gold-liposomes” for 60 min. In most of the cases, the “gold-liposomes” were easily removed from the cell membrane when probed with the AFM cantilever. The force loading exercised by the AFM probe, scanning to a velocity of 30 μm/s, removed ~90% of the liposomes. This indicated a poor binding efficiency with the plasma membrane and obstruction of the “gold-liposome” uptake after dynasore pretreatments.

4. Conclusions

Ninety-nanometer colloidal gold particles are a useful noninvasive labeling agent for visualization by AFM of liposome uptake by HCAECs. We were able to visualize the movement of the gold-coupled liposomes through the cell membrane before absorption. The time course of endocytosis was as follows: liposome attachment to the plasma membrane at 15–30 min, internalization at 30–60 min, and liposome uptake completed at 120 min. “Gold-liposome” clusters up to ~3 μm in diameter can be efficiently taken up by endocytosis regardless of their geometric structure.

The gold-coupled liposomes behaved as expected when exposed to an endocytosis inhibitor (dynasore) to block their internalization process. The gold nanoparticles did not hinder liposome uptake. We successfully established a potential method to track biomolecules in complex systems using 90 nm colloidal gold nanoparticles as a noninvasive contrast agent to improve AFM imaging.


The authors thank Dr. Russell Lebovitz of Marval Biosciences for his wise assistance during the development of this project and Dr. Maureen E. Goode, administrative director at the Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston for reviewing this paper. This work was supported by DoD/TATCR Grants W81XWH-04-2-0035 (T5), W81XWH-07-2-0031 (TexSHIELD), and NIH Clinical and Translational Science Award UL1 RR024148.

Supplementary Materials

AFM images of HCAECs incubated with FITC-labeled liposomes demonstrated that uncoupled liposomes were not detectable to the AFM technique as presented in the Figure S1. We provide supplementary information to support judgment on the use of colloidal gold nanoparticles as a noninvasive contrast agent to improve AFM imaging.

  1. Supplementary Material


  1. S. Anabousi, M. Laue, C. M. Lehr, U. Bakowsky, and C. Ehrhardt, “Assessing transferrin modification of liposomes by atomic force microscopy and transmission electron microscopy,” European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 295–303, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. G. Blume and G. Cevc, “Liposomes for the sustained drug release in vivo,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1029, no. 1, pp. 91–97, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. A. L. Klibanov, K. Maruyama, V. P. Torchilin, and L. Huang, “Amphipathic polyethyleneglycols effectively prolong the circulation time of liposomes,” FEBS Letters, vol. 268, no. 1, pp. 235–237, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. G. Bendas, A. Krause, U. Bakowsky, J. Vogel, and U. Rothe, “Targetability of novel immunoliposomes prepared by a new antibody conjugation technique,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, vol. 181, no. 1, pp. 79–93, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. A. Udhrain, K. M. Skubitz, and D. W. Northfelt, “Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in the treatment of AIDS-related Kaposi’s sarcoma,” Journal of Nanomedicine, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 345–352, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  6. F. Luderer, K. Sternberg, H. W. Rohm et al., “Suitability of nanoparticles for stent application,” in Proceedings of the 4th European Conference of the International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering (ECIFMBE '08), vol. 22, pp. 2339–2342, November 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. J. F. Hainfeld and R. D. Powell, “New frontiers in gold labeling,” Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 471–480, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  8. J. E. Beesley, “Colloidal gold for microbiological immunocytochemistry,” in Colloidal Gold: Principles, Methods and Applications, M. A. Hayat, Ed., vol. 1, pp. 421–425, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  9. D. Danila, R. Partha, D. B. Elrod, M. Lackey, S. W. Casscells, and J. L. Conyers, “Antibody-labeled liposomes for CT imaging of atherosclerotic plaques: in vitro investigation of an anti-ICAM antibody-labeled liposome containing iohexol for molecular imaging of atherosclerotic plaques via computed tomography,” Texas Heart Institute Journal, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 393–403, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  10. K. Laginha, D. Mumbengegwi, and T. Allen, “Liposomes targeted via two different antibodies: assay, B-cell binding and cytotoxicity,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1711, no. 1, pp. 25–32, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. C. B. Hansen, G. Y. Kao, E. H. Moase, S. Zalipsky, and T. M. Allen, “Attachment of antibodies to sterically stabilized liposomes: evaluation, comparison and optimization of coupling procedures,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1239, no. 2, pp. 133–144, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. Sartor, University of California San Diego, Index of neurophysics courses, (December, 2011),
  13. K. Maruyama, T. Takizawa, N. Takahashi, T. Tagawa, K. Nagaike, and M. Iwatsuru, “Targeting efficiency of PEG-immunoliposome-conjugated antibodies at PEG terminals,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 24, no. 2-3, pp. 235–242, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. S. Ramachandran, A. P. Quist, S. Kumar, and R. Lal, “Cisplatin nanoliposomes for cancer therapy: AFM and fluorescence imaging of cisplatin encapsulation, stability, cellular uptake, and toxicity,” Langmuir, vol. 22, no. 19, pp. 8156–8162, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. S. Sever, “Dynamin and endocytosis,” Current Opinion in Cell Biology, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 463–467, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. S. J. McClure and P. J. Robinson, “Dynamin, endocytosis and intracellular signalling,” Molecular Membrane Biology, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 189–215, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  17. J. E. Hinshaw, “Dynamin and its role in membrane fission,” Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 16, pp. 483–519, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  18. K. N. Fish, S. L. Schmid, and H. Damke, “Evidence that dynamin-2 functions as a signal-transducing GTPase,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 150, no. 1, pp. 145–154, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. A. J. Newton, T. Kirchhausen, and V. M. Murthy, “Inhibition of dynamin completely blocks compensatory synaptic vesicle endocytosis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 47, pp. 17955–17960, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. E. Mastrobattista, G. Storm, L. Van Bloois et al., “Cellular uptake of liposomes targeted to intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) on bronchial epithelial cells,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1419, no. 2, pp. 353–363, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. V. Hengst, C. Oussoren, T. Kissel, and G. Storm, “Bone targeting potential of bisphosphonate-targeted liposomes. Preparation, characterization and hydroxyapatite binding in vitro,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, vol. 331, no. 2, pp. 224–227, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. S. A. Jackson and R. M. Thomas, Cross-Sectional Imaging Made Easy, Churchill Livingstone, New York, NY, USA, 2004.
  23. G. Puu, E. Artursson, I. Gustafson, M. Lundström, and J. Jass, “Distribution and stability of membrane proteins in lipid membranes on solid supports,” Biosensors and Bioelectronics, vol. 15, no. 1-2, pp. 31–41, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. I. Ruspantini, M. Diociaiuti, R. Ippoliti et al., “Immunogold localisation of P-glycoprotein in supported lipid bilayers by transmission electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy,” Histochemical Journal, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 305–309, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Ana-María Zaske et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1277 Views | 1062 Downloads | 2 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19.