Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Robotics
Volume 2010, Article ID 523757, 8 pages
Review Article

Deep Blue Cannot Play Checkers: The Need for Generalized Intelligence for Mobile Robots

1U.S. Army Research Laboratory, AMSRD-ARL-HR-SE, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005-5425, USA
2Department of Engineering and Mathematics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA

Received 7 November 2009; Accepted 20 March 2010

Academic Editor: Noriyasu Homma

Copyright © 2010 Troy D. Kelley and Lyle N. Long. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. B. Darrach, “Meet Shaky: the first electronic person,” Life Magazine, vol. 69, no. 21, pp. 58B–68B, 1970. View at Google Scholar
  2. D. Goodman and R. Keene, Man Versus Machine, Kasparov Versus Deep Blue, H3 Publications, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1997.
  3. L. N. Long and T. D. Kelley, “Review of consciousness and the possibility of conscious robots,” Journal of Aerospace Computing, Information and Communication, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 68–84, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. S. D. Hanford, O. Janrathitikarn, and L. N. Long, “Control of mobile robots using the soar cognitive architecture,” Journal of Aerospace Computing, Information and Communication, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 69–71, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. D. E. Rumelhart and J. L. McClelland, “On learning the past tenses of English verbs,” in Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, J. L. McClelland and D. E. Rumelhart, Eds., vol. 11, pp. 216–270, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  6. S. Lawrence, C. L. E. E. Giles, and A. H. C. Tsoi, “Lessons in neural network training: overfitting may be harder than expected,” in Proceedings of the 14th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI '97), pp. 540–545, Menlo Park, Calif, USA, August 1997.
  7. M. McCloskey and N. Cohen, “Catastrophic interference in connectionist networks: the sequential learning problem,” in The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, G. H. Bower, Ed., vol. 24, pp. 109–164, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  8. S. E. Fahlman and C. Lebiere, “The cascade-correlation architecture,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Structures, D. S. Touretsky, Ed., vol. 2, pp. 524–532, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, Calif, USA, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  9. A. V. Robins and S. J. R. McCallum, “A robust method for distinguishing between learned and spurious attractors,” Neural Networks, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 313–326, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  10. G. A. Carpenter and S. Grossberg, “Adaptive resonance theory (ART),” The Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 2nd edition, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  11. W. Maass and C. M. Bishop, Pulsed Neural Networks, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1999.
  12. R. Pfeifer and C. Scheier, Understanding Intelligence, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 2000.
  13. R. A. Brooks, “Elephants don't play chess,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 6, no. 1-2, pp. 3–15, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  14. A. Newell, Soar: A Cognitive Architecture in Perspective, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1990.
  15. J. R. Anderson and C. Lebiere, The Atomic Components of Thought, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, USA, 1998.
  16. D. E. Meyer and D. E. Kieras, “A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: part 1. Basic mechanisms,” Psychological Review, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 3–65, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  17. T. D. Kelley, E. Avery, L. N. Long, and E. Dimperio, “A hybrid symbolic and sub-symbolic intelligent system for mobile robots,” in InfoTech@Aerospace Conference, Seattle, Wash, USA, 2009, AIAA 2009-1976.
  18. J. McCarthy and P. J. Hayes, “Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence,” Machine Intelligence, vol. 4, pp. 463–502, 1969. View at Google Scholar
  19. T. D. Kelley, “Symbolic and sub-symbolic representations in computational models of human cognition: what can be learned from biology?” Theory and Psychology, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 847–860, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. P. Dean, “Recapitulation of a theme by Lashley? Comment on Wood's simulated lesion experiment,” Psychological Review, vol. 87, no. 5, pp. 470–473, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. R. Sun and T. Peterson, “Hybrid learning incorporating neural and symbolic processes,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 1, pp. 727–732, Anchorage, Alaska, USA, June 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. T. A. Mitchell, Machine Learning, WCB/McGraw Hill, Boston, Mass, USA, 1997.
  23. R. C. Schank, “The structure of episodes in memory,” in Representation and Understanding: Studies in Cognitive Science, D. Bobrow and A. Collins, Eds., Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1975. View at Google Scholar
  24. M. Minsky, “A framework for representing knowledge,” in Mind Design: Philosophy, Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, J. Haugeland, Ed., MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 1975. View at Google Scholar
  25. K. J. Holyoak and K. Koh, “Surface and structural similarity in analogical transfer,” Memory and Cognition, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 332–340, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  26. M. L. Gick and K. J. Holyoak, “Analogical problem solving,” Cognitive Psychology, vol. 12, pp. 306–355, 1980. View at Google Scholar
  27. M. L. Gick and K. J. Holyoak, “Schema induction and analogical transfer,” Cognitive Psychology, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–38, 1983. View at Google Scholar
  28. K. J. Holyoak and P. Thagard, “Analogical mapping by constraint satisfaction,” Cognitive Science, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 295–355, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  29. L. R. Novick, “Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and expertise,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 510–520, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  30. K. A. Ericsson, “The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance,” in Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance, K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. Feltovich, and R. R. Hoffman, Eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  31. S. Thrun, “Lifelong learning algorithms,” in Learning to Learn, S. Thrun and L. Pratt, Eds., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Mass, USA, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  32. L. S. Gottfredson, “Mainstream science on intelligence: an editorial with 52 signatories, history, and bibliography,” Intelligence, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 13–23, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  33. G. A. Bekey, Autonomous Robots: From Biological Inspiration to Implementation and Control, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, USA, 2005.
  34. A. Gupta and L. N. Long, “Hebbian learning with winner take all for spiking neural networks,” in Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN '09), pp. 1054–1060, Atlanta, Ga, USA, June 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. J. L. McClelland, “The place of modeling in cognitive science,” Topics in Cognitive Science, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 11–38, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  36. T. D. Kelley, “Simulating intelligent behavior requires a complex approach,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Cognitive Science Principles Meet AI-Hard Problems, C. Lebiere and R. Wray, Eds., pp. 70–73, AAAI press, Stanford, Calif, USA, March 2006.