Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Robotics
Volume 2018, Article ID 2412608, 9 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/2412608
Research Article

On the Direct Kinematics Problem of Parallel Mechanisms

Workgroup on System Technologies and Engineering Design Methodology, Hamburg University of Technology, 21073 Hamburg, Germany

Correspondence should be addressed to Arthur Seibel; ed.hhut@lebies.ruhtra

Received 26 October 2017; Revised 1 January 2018; Accepted 9 January 2018; Published 12 March 2018

Academic Editor: Gordon R. Pennock

Copyright © 2018 Arthur Seibel et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. F. Ronga and T. Vust, “Stewart platforms without computer?” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Real Analytic and Algebraic Geometry, pp. 197–212, Trento, Italy, 1992. View at MathSciNet
  2. K. H. Hunt and E. J. F. Primrose, “Assembly configurations of some in-parallel-actuated manipulators,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 31–42, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. D. Lazard, “On the representation of rigid-body motions and its application to generalized platform manipulators,” in Computational Kinematics, G. M. L. Gladwell, J. Angeles, G. Hommel, and P. Kovács, Eds., vol. 28 of Solid Mechanics and Its Applications, pp. 175–181, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. B. Mourrain, “The 40 “generic” positions of a parallel robot,” in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation, pp. 173–182, Kiev, Ukraine, July 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. M. Raghavan, “Stewart platform of general geometry has 40 configurations,” Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 115, no. 2, pp. 277–280, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. Raghavan and B. Roth, “Solving polynomial systems for the kinematic analysis and synthesis of mechanisms and robot manipulators,” Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 117, pp. 71–79, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. L. Husty, “An algorithm for solving the direct kinematics of general Stewart-Gough platforms,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 365–379, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. P. Dietmaier, “The Stewart-Gough platform of general geometry can have 40 real postures,” in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Advances in Robot Kinematics, pp. 7–16, Strobl, Austria, 1998. View at MathSciNet
  9. J. C. Faugère and D. Lazard, “Combinatorial classes of parallel manipulators,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 765–776, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J.-P. Merlet, Parallel Robots, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2nd edition, 2006.
  11. Z. Geng and L. Haynes, “Neural network solution for the forward kinematics problem of a Stewart platform,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 2650–2655, Sacramento, CA, USA, April 1991. View at Scopus
  12. N. Mimura and Y. Funahashi, “New analytical system applying 6 DOF parallel link manipulator for evaluating motion sensation,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 227–233, Nagoya, Japan, May 1995. View at Scopus
  13. R. Boudreau and N. Turkkan, “Solving the forward kinematics of parallel manipulators with a genetic algorithm,” Journal of Robotic Systems, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 111–125, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. B. Dasgupta and T. S. Mruthyunjaya, “A constructive predictor-corrector algorithm for the direct position kinematics problem for a general 6-6 Stewart platform,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 799–811, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C. M. Gosselin, “Parallel computational algorithms for the kinematics and dynamics of planar and spatial parallel manipulators,” Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 22–28, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. P. R. McAree and R. W. Daniel, “A fast, robust solution to the Stewart platform forward kinematics,” Journal of Robotic Systems, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 407–427, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. K. Der-Ming, “Direct displacement analysis of a Stewart platform mechanism,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 453–465, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. K. Dhingra, A. N. Almadi, and D. Kohli, “A Gröbner-Sylvester hybrid method for closed-form displacement analysis of mechanisms,” Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 122, no. 4, pp. 431–438, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. K. H. Hunt and P. R. McAree, “The octahedral manipulator: geometry and mobility,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 868–885, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. Z. Šika, V. Kocandrle, and V. Stejskal, “An investigation of properties of the forward displacement analysis of the generalized Stewart platform by means of general optimization methods,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 245–253, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  21. R. Stoughton and T. Arai, “Optimal sensor placement for forward kinematics evaluation of a 6-DOF parallel link manipulator,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Workshop on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 785–790, Osaka, Japan, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. K. C. Cheok, J. L. Overholt, and R. R. Beck, “Exact methods for determining the kinematics of a Stewart platform using additional displacement sensors,” Journal of Robotic Systems, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 689–707, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J.-P. Merlet, “Closed-form resolution of the direct kinematics of parallel manipulators using extra sensors data,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 200–204, Singapore, Singapore, May 1993. View at Scopus
  24. R. Nair and J. H. Maddocks, “On the forward kinematics of parallel manipulators,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 171–188, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. L. Baron and J. Angeles, “The direct kinematics of parallel manipulators under joint-sensor redundancy,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 12–19, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. Y.-J. Chiu and M.-H. Perng, “Forward kinematics of a general fully parallel manipulator with auxiliary sensors,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 401–414, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. Hesselbach, C. Bier, I. Pietsch et al., “Passive joint-sensor applications for parallel robots,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 3507–3512, Sendai, Japan, October 2004. View at Scopus
  28. R. Vertechy and V. Parenti Castelli, “Accurate and fast body pose estimation by three point position data,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 1170–1183, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. S. Schulz, A. Seibel, D. Schreiber, and J. Schlattmann, “Sensor concept for solving the direct kinematics problem of the Stewart-Gough platform,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 1959–1964, Vancouver, Canada, September 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. G. H. Golub and C. F. Van Loan, Matrix Computations, vol. 3 of Johns Hopkins Series in the Mathematical Sciences, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA, 1983. View at MathSciNet
  31. U. Qureshi and F. Golnaraghi, “An algorithm for the in-field calibration of a MEMS IMU,” IEEE Sensors Journal, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. R. G. Valenti, I. Dryanovski, and J. Xiao, “Keeping a good attitude: a quaternion-based orientation filter for IMUs and MARGs,” Sensors, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 19302–19330, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. S. O. H. Madgwick, A. J. L. Harrison, and R. Vaidyanathan, “Estimation of IMU and MARG orientation using a gradient descent algorithm,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, pp. 179–185, Zurich, Switzerland, July 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. X. Yun, M. Lizarraga, E. R. Bachmann, and R. B. McGhee, “An improved quaternion-based Kalman filter for real-time tracking of rigid body orientation,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 1074–1079, Las Vegas, NV, USA, October 2003. View at Scopus