Comparative Study of Two Localization Approaches for Mobile Robots in an Indoor Environment

<table class="table-group" id="tab18"><tr><td><table class="table"><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="3"><hr/></td></tr><tr class="thead"><td class="align_left">AEE</td><td class="align_center">Gaussian noise</td><td class="align_center">Non-Gaussian noise</td></tr><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="3"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">EKF</td><td class="align_center">0.029</td><td class="align_center">2.32</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">PF</td><td class="align_center">0.054</td><td class="align_center">0.020</td></tr><tr class="table-tr"><td colspan="3"><hr class="tbody-hr"/></td></tr></table></td></tr></table>

Journal of Robotics

tab18

Table 18

Table 18: Comparative Study of Two Localization Approaches for Mobile Robots in an Indoor Environment 