Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Sensors
Volume 2017, Article ID 4196431, 9 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4196431
Research Article

Ultrashort Long-Period Fiber Grating Sensors Inscribed on a Single Mode Fiber Using Laser Radiation

1Laboratório de Óptica, Lasers e Sistemas, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-038 Lisboa, Portugal
2Instituto de Biofísica e Engenharia Biomédica, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal

Correspondence should be addressed to Manuel Abreu; tp.lu.cf@uerbaam

Received 30 May 2017; Revised 7 July 2017; Accepted 30 July 2017; Published 30 August 2017

Academic Editor: Stefania Campopiano

Copyright © 2017 Marta Nespereira et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Sensing performances of ultrashort (as low as 2.4 mm) long-period fiber gratings fabricated with CO2 laser radiation using commercial single mode fibers are presented. These lengths are, to our knowledge, the shortest of those found in the literature for this kind of sensors, approaching those typical in fiber Bragg gratings. Sensitivity to temperature and refractive index are demonstrated, with performances within the range expected for a single LPFG written on a single mode fiber without any enhancing technique. Analysis on results is made based on both theoretical and experimental data.

1. Introduction

Laser processing of optical fibers to produce fiber-based sensors has gained importance as a research theme, in particular regarding optical fiber grating sensors. These sensors are classified into two types: short-period gratings (also called reflection or fiber Bragg gratings, FBGs), in which coupling occurs between modes traveling in opposite directions, and transmission gratings (or long-period fiber gratings, LPFGs), where the coupling occurs between modes traveling in the same direction. Compared to other optical devices, LPFGs have a number of unique advantages: low insertion losses, high temperature sensitivity, and relatively simple fabrication. A further advantage of LPFG devices is their higher sensitivity to the environmental refractive index change without the need for access to the evanescent field, as in the case of the FBGs [1].

LPFGs have been developed and improved for decades, which resulted in numerous fabrication techniques and in a set of different sensor types, from simple LPFGs to interferometric systems, plasmonic resonance based sensing, and special fibers like photonic crystals [25]. There are many fabrication techniques inducing a permanent change on the refractive index: laser-based inscription systems such as UV [6], femtosecond pulses [7], and CO2 laser near-infrared radiation [8], or physically deforming the fiber using other methods such as electric arc discharges [911], ion implantation [12], or microbends [13].

One important feature of LPFG systems is their potential to be endowed with different degrees of complexity, from single gratings to the application of different sensitivity enhancing techniques, such as mirrored ends [3], tapered LPFGs [14], or chemical etching [15]. Other techniques are based on SPR (Surface Plasmonic Resonance) configurations [5], different film coatings [16, 17], or nanospheres [18].

These gratings are fabricated with periods ranging from hundreds of micrometers to millimetres, and the majority have lengths of around 25–40 mm; representative typical examples reported in the literature are summarized in Table 1 [6, 7, 9, 1936]. The two exceptions to this range (and the only ones we found in the literature) are the works of Wang [20] and Nam et al. [9]. The first engraves the LPFGs in PCF (Photonic Crystal Fiber) using a CO2 laser and the second uses electric arc for producing ultrashort LPFGs on regular single mode fibers.

Table 1: Values of grating length, , found in the literature, for LPFGs written in regular SMF or PCF fibers. designates the grating period.

In this paper, we present LPFGs written in single mode fibers (Corning SMF-28) using CO2 laser radiation (10.6 μm wavelength) with the remarkable characteristic of having a very short length (less than 10 mm, in the range of 2.4 mm to 8.4 mm). In comparison with the common 25–40 mm length LPFGs, these gratings are, to our knowledge, the shortest obtained so far using single mode fibers and CO2 laser radiation, very close to the typical lengths of FBGs (typically a few mm). This makes them especially appealing for applications in which compactness is essential [37], or when the application requires probing small volumes. Using single mode fibers allows reducing the cost, when compared with using PCF, and using CO2 laser radiation allows better repeatability (compared with electric arc) and cheaper cost when compared with other laser technologies (like femtosecond-based technologies) and makes using photosensitive fibers unnecessary (required when using UV radiation). We also analyze the performance of the manufactured gratings as sensors of temperature and refractive index.

In the following section, we review the working principles of LPFGs, the physical bases of LPFGs as temperature and refractive index sensors, and a brief review of these two types of sensors in terms of their main characteristics. The experimental setup and methodologies will be explained in Section 3 and results will be presented and analyzed in Section 4.

2. Principles

2.1. Working Principles of LPFG Sensors

As mentioned before, LPFGs are periodic structures engraved in the optical fiber along its longitudinal axes with the purpose of inducing a slight change in the refractive index of the fiber core. They can be considered a particular case of FBGs, where the induced birefringence couples the light from the core (core mode) into the cladding, depending on the manufacturing technique and characteristics of the grating, such as period and length. The behavior of the different modes in a waveguide is described analytically by the coupled-mode theory [38]. Within the scope of this theory, the electric fields of the propagating modes are described by considering the grating as a dielectric perturbation that affects the effective refractive index of the propagation medium and the field amplitudes of the modes. The mathematical development requires calculating the effective refractive index of the medium for the core and cladding modes and the coupling constant, resulting in general coupled-mode equations [38]. The solution of these equations provides the transmission spectra of the grating, which relates the resonance wavelength, the grating’s period, and the order of the coupled modes, expressed in the form (acronym for “linearly polarized”). For symmetrical modes, , with () for the fundamental mode. The asymmetric modes are referenced by , with . The equation that summarizes the basic working principle of LPFGs is the phase matching condition [2] that relates the resonance wavelength at which the core and a specific cladding mode are coupled, the difference between the effective refractive indexes of the core and the th cladding mode, and , respectively, and the grating’s period Λ.

LPFGs are characterized, among their fabrication parameters (period, length), by the coupling coefficient, , which describes the optimal coupling, according toThis expression shows that coupling depends directly on the grating’s length, , and the product is known as “coupling strength” [37]. If < π/2, the light is not completely coupled into a cladding mode, while if > π/2, the light is first fully coupled into a cladding mode and then back-coupled again into a core mode, a phenomenon known as overcoupling [19]. The value of the coupling coefficient depends on the mechanical tension applied to the fiber and on the laser power, as both parameters affect the refractive index modulation in both core and cladding. In this kind of sensors, created under high tension, the coupling constant is usually high, in the order of 10 cm−1 [9]. Although does not change the value of , the degree of coupling is affected, and the balance between and is usually established experimentally, while the LPFG is being created.

The sensitivity of a LPFG to an external parameter (induced or not) depends basically on the type of physical changes being induced in the grating. Temperature and refractive index are the examples that were considered in our work.

Grating sensitivity to temperature depends on two effects: one due to the change on the refractive indexes due to temperature variation and the other based on the thermomechanical sensitivity of the grating period [2].

By differentiation of the phase matching condition with respect to temperature, the sensitivity can be expressed mathematically by [2]In this equation, the first term of the second-hand siderepresents the thermooptic effect (material contribution), where . In addition, represents the contribution of the waveguide effect and is the thermal expansion coefficient.

The ability to use a LPFG to sense changes in the refractive index of the environment arises from the dependence of the effective refractive index for different th cladding modes upon the difference between the refractive index of the cladding and the refractive index of the surrounding medium; as shown in (1), the resonance depends on the effective refractive index of the aforesaid cladding modes [2]. The variation of the transmitted wavelength with the refractive index is therefore given by [39]The term is different for different cladding modes; therefore, the sensitivity of the sensor depends on the specific mode being coupled to.

LPFGs created by CO2 laser radiation have some particularities regarding the three main physical mechanisms that modulate refractive index and mode coupling: residual stress relaxation, changes in the glass structure, and physical deformation. Residual stress relaxation is produced when LPFGs are written on fibers submitted to high tensile forces and results from different thermal expansion and viscoelastic properties between the core and the cladding. Changes in the glass structure are due to volume increase and glass densification, and the resulting physical deformations induce a variation of the effective refractive index along the fiber axis [40]. Since LPFGs are usually created by irradiating one side of the fiber, an asymmetrical refractive index profile is produced. This leads to an asymmetrical mode coupling, which can be considered a distinctive feature of CO2 laser induced LPFGs [20].

2.2. LPFG-Based Sensors: Sensitivities to Temperature and Refractive Index

In regard to sensing applications, LPGFs are based on well-known responses to different physical measurands, such as temperature, refractive index, torsion, bend, pressure, and strain [2, 21, 2628, 3335, 39, 4144].

For temperature sensing, the typical values of sensitivities found in the literature range from around 0.05 to 0.3 nm/°C. The values are higher when more complex sensing structures were created, like, for example, a dual LPFG system [27]. Also, as mentioned by Nam et al. [9], sensitivity increases at high temperature: they measured a sensitivity of 0.054 nm/°C from room temperature to 200°C, while from 200°C to 1000°C, the value was approximately 0.135 nm/°C [9].

Regarding refraction index sensing, most authors report LPFGs’ response to the refractive index in terms of resolution, publishing values one or two orders of magnitude higher than those measured by Abbe refractometers. The resolution values are around 10−4 to 10−6 RIU. As with temperature, such high values are obtained with more complex sensing systems instead of a single LPFG, such as the sandwiched system of three LPFGs in [27] or the Mach-Zehnder interferometer in [30]. A Photonic Crystal Fiber (PCF) was used by Rindorf and Bang [29].

3. Experimental Setups and Methods

The LPFGs fabrication technique consists in a focused CO2 laser beam (Synrad, 25 W) periodically sweeping the fiber using an automatic system controlled by LabVIEW©, as described in detail in [8, 45]. The average laser power was 4.5 W (±1 W), the focusing lens was cylindrical, with a working distance of 50 mm, and the exposure time was ~0.6 s.

A set of LPFGs were fabricated with a 600 μm period and lengths varying between 2.4 mm and 4.8 mm. A weight of around 80 g (0.78 N) was applied to the engraving fibers, therefore inducing a high strain into the fibers. The period was chosen based on preliminary tests with our methodology [8]: it was one of those showing better repeatability and peak attenuation.

For temperature and refractive index measurements, the gratings were placed in a closed recipient filled with different fluids, as shown in Figure 1. Regarding temperature, the gratings were submerged in either boiling or frozen water, while a thermocouple was used for calibration. The corresponding spectra for each temperature were recorded in real time with an Optical Spectrum Analyzer (OSA) (Agilent 86140B) while the optical fiber was illuminated by a Super Luminescent Diode (SLD) with a central wavelength of 1550 nm and spectral width of ~160 nm. To test the sensors while measuring the refractive index, dissolution of ethylene glycol at different concentrations was used, having the refractive index of the solution previously measured with an Abbe refractometer (illuminated by a halogen lamp).

Figure 1: Schematic of the setup used for refractive index and temperature sensing tests.

4. Results and Analysis

According to the coupled-mode theory (Section 2.1), and using a Matlab© simulation [4648], under the conditions previously described for the LPFGs, the coupling was found to occur between the LP01 core mode and the LP13 azimuthally asymmetric cladding mode (). This can be illustrated considering Figure 2, which shows the characteristic LPFG’s phase matching curve, representing versus for a grating with 6 mm length, and considering a 2-layer model and an asymmetrical mode [4648]. The plot shows a set of periods complying with the phase matching condition (see (1)) for different resonance wavelengths. Each line represents a cladding mode, from the lowest-order mode () to the highest-order mode () (right to left). Then, for a period of 600 μm and a resonance wavelength of around 1.5 μm, the mode has an order .

Figure 2: Phase matching curves, for a 6 mm length grating; indicates the order of the mode.

For predicting the maximum refractive index changes induced in the core and cladding, we used a 3D Finite Element Model developed by the authors [8]. Since the experimental conditions are similar to those reported there, the behavior of the refractive index change of the core, , with the applied force, , in Newton, can be considered linear and given by the empirical equation [8]The equivalent variation for the cladding was demonstrated to be two orders of magnitude smaller and not significantly changing with [8]. Using the simulator mentioned before [46], it is then possible to study the variation in the attenuation signal at for different applied weights or by changing the gratings length. Figure 3(a) exemplifies the change for a 4.8 mm length grating subjected to different weights. The plot shows that, for lower weights, the attenuation is small, which in practice limits the use of the grating as a sensor. Similarly, when using a low weight, in order to produce a useful sensing device, a grating with higher length is required. This effect is exemplified in Figure 3(b), representing the attenuation at for different grating lengths, with a fixed weight of 5 g (0.049 N) when compared with the equivalent Figure 3(c) for a fixed weight of 80 g (0.78 N).

Figure 3: Theoretical attenuation at the resonance peak of a 600 μm period LPFG when considering (a) a length of 4.8 mm and different weights and (b) 5 g (0.049 N) and (c) 80 g (0.78 N) weights and different length.

The range assumed for the latter plot is reduced because although theoretically one can use higher weights when producing longer LPFGs (and obtain attenuations down to −700 dBm for a 50 mm LPFG), in practice this usually leads to fiber breakage, due to the combined effect of glass melting and weight pulling. Even when manufacturing shorter LPFGs with heavier weights, as we did, some tapering effect (and the resulting cladding thickness modulation) appears, as shown in Figure 4 (which shows a microscope photograph of an irradiated fiber under the experimental conditions considered in this work). The imaged zone comprises one 600 μm period of a grating irradiated with 4.5 W, for a duration of 0.6 s (each pulse), and subjected to a weight of 80 g (0.78 N).

Figure 4: Micrograph showing the tapering effect in the irradiated zones in a 2.4 mm LPFG with 600 μm period written on an SMF-28 optical fiber ( ≈ 4.5 W; = 0.6 s; ≈ 0.78 N).

Thus, although higher pulling forces allow shorter length LPFGs, as predicted by theory, manufacturing can be affected by the resulting pulling force and the tapering effect can lead to breakage. Therefore, complete control of the process during the irradiation is mandatory. Taking this into consideration, with our experimental procedures, we were able to obtain LPFGs with significant attenuations at their resonance wavelength, . Figure 5 exemplifies the spectra obtained for two ultrashort LPFGs. Their responses to variations of temperature and environment refractive index are analyzed hereafter. For each of the measurands, we will exemplify with the shorter length that still allows obtaining quality sensors (regarding repeatability and/or attenuation).

Figure 5: Transmission spectra (taken on air, at 22°C) of two ultrashort LPFGs with (a) 2.4 mm and (b) 4.8 mm length, a 600 μm period, written on SMF-28 optical fibers ( ≈ 4.5 W; = 0.6 s; ≈ 0.78 N).
4.1. Temperature Sensing

Using the assembly sketched in Figure 1, it was experimentally observed that while the surrounding temperature increases, the resonance peak shifts towards higher wavelengths, while the amplitude (intensity) of the peak decreases, becoming less sharp. Figure 6 shows typical spectra, with the resonance moving towards shorter wavelengths while cooling down.

Figure 6: Example of the resonance shift with decreasing temperature of the medium for a 4.8 mm length grating.

The response of the fiber is linear and sensitivities are within 0.06–0.08 nm/°C in the temperature range of 25°C to 75°C, for the LPFG lengths considered in our study. Figure 7 shows an example for a grating with a 600 μm period and 4.8 mm length. The error in the linear adjustment obtained by the least squares method does not exceed  nm/°C. The resolution is obtained by dividing the resolution of the OSA (minimum wavelength at FWHM) by the sensitivity derived from the calibration line. In this case, the resolution ranges from 0.75°C to 1°C.

Figure 7: Variations with temperature of the resonance wavelength of a grating with 4.8 mm length.

In comparison, sensitivities are within the range of values presented in the literature for the temperature ranges considered in our study. Even considering higher ranges, although the values are not among the highest (e.g., [26, 27]), these gratings are much smaller than the regular ones, with a small number of “periods,” and one of the factors affecting temperature sensitivity (wavelength effect) is directly connected to the number of periods, as discussed in Section 2.1.

4.2. Refractive Index Sensing

Using the same setup as for the temperature measurement testing (Figure 1), it was also observed that while increasing the refractive index of the surrounding environment, the resonance peak shifts linearly towards shorter wavelengths. Figure 8 shows a typical spectrum for a grating subjected to variations of the refractive index of the surrounding medium. In this case, the attenuation of the resonance peak becomes sharper and more pronounced while the refractive index increases. The increase of the attenuation could be explained by the absorption of this solvent at the infrared band, as explained in [49]. This potentially allows replacing an OSA by a much simpler power meter or by an Optical Time-Domain Reflectometer (OTDR), therefore leading to cheaper interrogation methods.

Figure 8: Example of the peak attenuation with the change in the refractive index of the medium (water with a variable percentage of ethylene glycol), for a grating with 2.4 mm length.

In Figure 9, we show some examples of the response of the gratings to changes of the refractive index, with an absolute sensitivity of around 30 nm/RIU (about 14 nm/RIU, if we analyze the change in the attenuation of the signal), in the range of 1.333 to 1.431 RIU, which leads to resolutions in the order of magnitude of 10−3 RIU. The error in the linear adjustment is in the range of approximately ±3 nm/RIU, obtained by the method of least squares.

Figure 9: Responses of (a) the resonance wavelength and (b) attenuation of the signal with regard to the refractive index variation, for a grating with 2.4 mm length.

The response of the gratings and their sensitivities are consistent with results reported for these types of sensors, although the comparison with the values mentioned in the literature (Section 2.2) shows that resolution is worse than that provided by a typical Abbe refractometer, which can be of the order of 10−5 RIU in the range of 1.33 to 1.58 RIU. In fact, the resolution of the OSA used in these experiments, 0.06 nm, is actually limiting the resolution of these gratings.

5. Conclusions

The possibility of manufacturing ultrashort LPFGs by irradiating single mode fibers with CO2 laser radiation and high tension (up to 0.78 N) was clearly demonstrated. Grating lengths (for a 600 μm period) reached 2.4 and 4.8 mm, far smaller than the 25 to 40 mm usually reported in the literature, but performances are alike. Performance of these LPFGs was assessed for measuring temperature and refractive index demonstrating,(i)for the temperature, sensitivities in the interval 0.06–0.08 nm/°C in the measuring range of 25 to 75°C and for the overall LPFG lengths being studied;(ii)for the refractive index, sensitivities of around −30 nm/RIU in the measuring range of 1.333 to 1.431 RIU.These values are fully consistent with the results reported in the literature for much longer LPFGs written in single mode fibers and under similar sensing operation, therefore demonstrating the sensing capabilities of our much shorter sensors. We anticipate that these small LPFGs demonstrate a high potential for applications requiring small sizes and compact sensing, especially in the areas of biosensing with less invasive devices, or civil engineering and structural health, by facilitating the embedding into the hosting material. Postinscription application of enhancing techniques like nanoparticles deposition is expected to give these gratings an even better sensitivity. Future work will follow this line of research and will explore the use of these ultrashort length gratings in the creation of more complex sensors, as concatenated LPFGs.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported through national funding by the Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT) through Project UID/BIO/00645/2013. The authors gratefully thank José Luis Santos, Orlando Frazão, Pedro Jorge, and Paulo Caldas from INESC-Porto for their advice and contributions. Special thanks are due to Catarina Silva, David Castro Alves, Fernando Monteiro, and António Oliveira for their support.

References

  1. J. M. P. Coelho, M. Nespereira, C. Silva, D. Pereira, and J. Rebordão, “Advances in optical fiber laser micromachining for sensors development,” in Current Developments in Optical Fiber Technology, pp. 375–401, InTech, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  2. S. W. James and R. P. Tatam, “Optical fibre long-period grating sensors: characteristics and application,” Measurement Science and Technology, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. R49–R61, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. P. L. Swart, “Long-period grating Michelson refractometric sensor,” Measurement Science and Technology, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 1576–1580, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. W. Shin, Y. L. Lee, T. J. Eom, B.-A. Yu, and Y.-C. Noh, “Temperature insensitive strain sensor based on long period fiber grating pair in photonic crystal fibers,” in Proceedings of the 2009 14th OptoElectronics and Communications Conference, OECC 2009, chn, July 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. Y.-J. He, Y.-L. Lo, and J.-F. Huang, “Optical-fiber surface-plasmon-resonance sensor employing long-period fiber gratings in multiplexing,” Journal of the Optical Society of America B: Optical Physics, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 801–811, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. V. Bhatia, “Applications of long-period gratings to single and multi-parameter sensing,” Optics Express, vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 457–466, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. Duan, Z. Xie, C. Wang et al., “Torsion sensing characteristics of long period fiber gratings fabricated by femtosecond laser in optical fiber,” Optics and Laser Technology, vol. 83, pp. 94–98, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. M. P. Coelho, C. Silva, M. Nespereira, M. Abreu, and J. M. Rebordão, “Writing of Long Period Fiber Gratings Using CO2 Laser Radiation,” in Advances in Optical Fiber Technology: Fundamental Optical Phenomena and Applications, pp. 287–314, InTech, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  9. S. H. Nam, C. Zhan, J. Lee et al., “Bend-insensitive ultra short long-period gratings by the electric arc method and their applications to harsh environment sensing and communication,” Optics Express, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 731–737, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. G. Humbert and A. Malki, “Characterizations at very high temperature of electric arc-induced long-period fiber gratings,” Optics Communications, vol. 208, no. 4-6, pp. 329–335, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. Kosinski and A. Vengsarkar, “Splicer-based long-period fiber gratings,” in Proceedings of the OFC '98 Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exhibit. Technical Digest Conference Edition 1998 OSA Technical Digest Series. Vol.2, pp. 278-279, San Jose, CA, USA. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. M. Fujimaki, Y. Ohki, J. L. Brebner, and S. Roorda, “Fabrication of long-period optical fiber gratings by use of ion implantation,” Optics Letters, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 88-89, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. I. K. Hwang, S. H. Yun, and B. Y. Kim, “Long-period fiber gratings based on periodic microbends,” Optics Letters, vol. 24, no. 18, pp. 1263–1265, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. P.-H. Lu, K.-C. Hsu, S.-S. Jyu, and Y. Lai, “Periodically tapered long-period fiber gratings by CO2 laser heating and tension stretching,” in Proceedings of the 15th Optoelectronics and Communications Conference (Oecc), pp. 626-627, 2010.
  15. K. Zhou, H. Liu, and X. Hu, “Tuning the resonant wavelength of long period fiber gratings by etching the fiber's cladding,” Optics Communications, vol. 197, no. 4-6, pp. 295–299, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. Z. Wang, J. R. Heflin, K. Van Cott, R. H. Stolen, S. Ramachandran, and S. Ghalmi, “Biosensors employing ionic self-assembled multilayers adsorbed on long-period fiber gratings,” Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, vol. 139, no. 2, pp. 618–623, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. Z. Wang, J. R. Heflin, R. H. Stolen, and S. Ramachandran, “Analysis of optical response of long period fiber gratings to nm-thick thin-film coatings,” Optics Express, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 2808–2813, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. D. Viegas, J. Goicoechea, J. M. Corres et al., “A fibre optic humidity sensor based on a long-period fibre grating coated with a thin film of SiO2 nanospheres,” Measurement Science and Technology, vol. 20, no. 3, Article ID 034002, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. R. Slavík, “Extremely deep long-period fiber grating made with CO2 laser,” IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 18, no. 16, pp. 1705–1707, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. Y. Wang, “Review of long period fiber gratings written by CO2 laser,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 108, no. 8, Article ID 081101, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. Y. Rao and T. Zhu, “A novel flat-band long period grating with special apodization induced by high frequency CO2 laser pulses,” in Proceedings of the the Optical Fiber Communication Conference, Optical Society of America, Anaheim, CA, USA, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. A. M. Vengsarkar, P. J. Lemaire, J. B. Judkins, V. Bhatia, T. Erdogan, and J. E. Sipe, “Long-period fiber gratings as band-rejection filters,” Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 58–64, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. Y. J. Rao, T. Zhu, and Q. J. Mo, “Highly sensitive fiber-optic torsion sensor based on an ultra-long-period fiber grating,” Optics Communications, vol. 266, no. 1, pp. 187–190, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. X. Lan, Q. Han, T. Wei, J. Huang, and H. Xiao, “Turn-around-point long-period fiber gratings fabricated by CO 2 Laser point-by-point irradiations,” IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 23, no. 22, pp. 1664–1666, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. S. T. Oh, W. T. Han, U. C. Paek, and Y. Chung, “Azimuthally symmetric long-period fiber gratings fabricated with CO 2 laser,” Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 188–190, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. B. Li, L. Jiang, S. Wang, H.-L. Tsai, and H. Xiao, “Femtosecond laser fabrication of long period fiber gratings and applications in refractive index sensing,” Optics and Laser Technology, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 1420–1423, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. Y.-G. Han, S. B. Lee, C.-S. Kim, J. U. Kang, U.-C. Faek, and Y. Chung, “Simultaneous measurement of temperature and strain using dual long-period fiber gratings with controlled temperature and strain sensitivities,” Optics Express, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 476–481, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. A. P. Zhang, L.-Y. Shao, J.-F. Ding, and S. He, “Sandwiched long-period gratings for simultaneous measurement of refractive index and temperature,” IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 2397–2399, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. L. Rindorf and O. Bang, “Highly sensitive refractometer with a photonic-crystal-fiber long-period grating,” Optics Letters, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 563–565, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. T. Allsop, R. Reeves, D. J. Webb, I. Bennion, and R. Neal, “A high sensitivity refractometer based upon a long period grating Mach-Zehnder interferometer,” Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 73, no. 4, p. 1702, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. T. Allsop, L. Zhang, and I. Bennion, “Detection of organic aromatic compounds in paraffin by a long-period fiber grating optical sensor with optimized sensitivity,” Optics Communications, vol. 191, no. 3-6, pp. 181–190, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. L. Shi, T. Zhu, Y.-E. Fan, K. S. Chiang, and Y. Rao, “Torsion sensing with a fiber ring laser incorporating a pair of rotary long-period fiber gratings,” Optics Communications, vol. 284, no. 22, pp. 5299–5302, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. Y. P. Wang and Y. J. Rao, “Long period fibre grating torsion sensor measuring twist rate and determining twist direction simultaneously,” Electronics Letters, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 164–166, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. Y.-J. Rao, Y.-P. Wang, Z.-L. Ran, and T. Zhu, “Novel fiber-optic sensors based on long-period fiber gratings written by high-frequency CO2 laser pulses,” Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 1320–1327, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. Y.-P. Wang and Y.-J. Rao, “CO2-laser induced LPFG torsion characteristics depending on length of twisted fibre,” Electronics Letters, vol. 40, no. 18, pp. 1101–1103, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. V. Bhatia, Properties and sensing applications of long-period gratings Ph.D. Dissertation [Ph.D. thesis], Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, 1996.
  37. R. Haslinger, P. Leyendecker, and U. Seibold, “A fiberoptic force-torque-sensor for minimally invasive robotic surgery,” in Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA 2013, pp. 4390–4395, deu, May 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. P. Caldas, Fiber Optic Sensing by Evanescent Field Interaction [Ph.D. thesis], Department of Physics and Astronomy of the Faculty of Sciences of the University of Porto, 2011.
  39. J. H. Chong, P. Shum, H. Haryono et al., “Measurements of refractive index sensitivity using long-period grating refractometer,” Optics Communications, vol. 229, no. 1-6, pp. 65–69, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. Y.-Q. Liu, W.-T. Tu, D. Yang, and T.-Y. Wang, “Fabrication of long-period fiber gratings by CO2 laser in fiber under tension,” Journal of Shanghai University, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. L. Qi, C.-L. Zhao, J. Yuan et al., “Highly reflective long period fiber grating sensor and its application in refractive index sensing,” Sensors and Actuators, B: Chemical, vol. 193, pp. 185–189, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. I. Peshko, O. Cherry, T. Rutkevich, B. Hockley, and V. Rubtsov, “Long-period gratings in optical fibres for chemical sensor applications,” Measurement Science and Technology, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 2221–2228, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. Nidhi, R. S. Kaler, U. Tiwari, V. Mishra, N. Singh, and P. Kapur, “Investigation of long period grating as refractive index sensor,” Optik, vol. 123, no. 12, pp. 1071–1073, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. R. Falciai, A. G. Mignani, and A. Vannini, “Long period gratings as solution concentration sensors,” Sensors and Actuators, B: Chemical, vol. 74, no. 1-3, pp. 74–77, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. D. Castro Alves, J. M. P. Coelho, M. Nespereira, F. Monteiro, M. Abreu, and J. M. Rebordão, “Automation methodology for the development of LPFG using CO2 laser radiation,” in Proceedings of the 8th Iberoamerican Optics Meeting, RIAO 2013 and 11th Latin American Meeting on Optics, Lasers, and Applications, OPTILAS 2013, prt, July 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. F. D. V. Baptista, Simulação do comportamento espectral de redes de período longo em fibra óptica [M.Sc. Thesis], Centro de Ciências Exactas e da Engenharia, University of Madeira, Funchal, Portugal, 2009.
  47. D. Gloge, “Weakly guiding fibers,” Applied Optics, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 2252–2258, 1971. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. D. Gloge, “Dispersion in Weakly Guiding Fibers,” Applied Optics, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 2442–2445, 1971. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. X. Daxhelet and M. Kulishov, “Theory and practice of long-period gratings: when a loss becomes a gain,” Optics Letters, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 686–688, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus