Mediators of Inflammation

Mediators of Inflammation / 2014 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 342410 | 8 pages |

The Physiopathological Role of IL-33: New Highlights in Bone Biology and a Proposed Role in Periodontal Disease

Academic Editor: Peter N. Pushparaj
Received13 Nov 2013
Revised03 Jan 2014
Accepted06 Jan 2014
Published18 Feb 2014


Interleukin-33 (IL-33) is a recently described member of the IL-1 family. IL-33 acts as an alarmin, chemoattractant, and nuclear factor. ST2, a member of the Toll-like receptor/IL-1R superfamily, the receptor of IL-33, triggers a plethora of downstream effectors and leads the activation of NFK-B, leading the expression of several genes. IL-33 and ST2 are expressed in the majority of cell types, and the IL-33/ST2 axis has a role in immune response, bone homeostasis, and osteoclastogenesis. Several studies show opposite roles of IL-33 in osteoclastogenesis and the implication in bone biology. Few works studied the role of IL-33 in periodontal disease, but we hypothesize a possible role of IL-33 in periodontal disease and bone loss.

1. Introduction

Interleukin-33 (IL-33) is a recently described member of the IL-1 family, which includes IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-18, and IL-1Ra [1]. Endothelial and epithelial cells constitutively produce this cytokine [2]. Interleukin-33 is the ligand of the ST2 receptor, also termed T1, T1/ST2, ST2L, St2-rs1, DER4, Fit-1, Ly-84, or IL-33R, a member of the Toll-like receptor/IL-1R superfamily [3, 4].

It was initially thought that IL-33 is produced as a precursor with a molecular weight of approximately 30 kDa and is cleaved by caspase-1 to form a mature form that lacks a signal sequence, producing a protein with 20~22 kDa. However, these in vitro studies did not represent what in fact happens [1]. IL-33 lacks a classical caspase-1 cleavage site; a cleavage site is located in the IL-1-like domain but the cleavage products are inactive [5]. The only situation in which IL-33 is cleaved by caspases such as caspase-3 and caspase-7 is during apoptosis [5]. Also, in vitro assays demonstrated that 30 kDa IL-33 can be activated by neutrophil serine proteases elastase, cathepsin G, and proteinase-3 [6].Interestingly, during apoptosis, IL-33 is retained inside the nucleus, leading to its cleavage and the inactivation of its proinflammatory properties. During necrosis, IL-33 is secreted into the extracellular matrix and most likely acts as an alarmin [7]. Some studies suggest another function of IL-33 as a transcription factor. The N-terminus of this protein has a nuclear export sequence and a helix-turn-helix-like motif that can bind with heterochromatin [8]. It is thought that these properties can modulate the compaction state of chromatin, and it most likely binds to the H2A-H2B (histone 2A-histone 2B) acidic pocket of nucleosomes [9].

In earlier studies, ST2 was shown to be selectively expressed on Th2 cells but not on Th1 cells or mast cells [1]. ST2 is expressed on the surface of various cellular types, and its gene has three splicing variants, two of which are physiologically important: a soluble variant of ST2 (sST2) and a surface-attached form (ST2L) [3, 4].

Recent works have shown that IL-33 can activate murine cells by directly driving the polarization of naïve T cells to produce Th2-phenotype cells [10] and by acting as chemoattractant for human Th2 cells [11]. Additional works have demonstrated that IL-33 has a role in eosinophils [12, 13], basophils [13, 14], neutrophils [15], and macrophages [16].

IL-33 and ST2 form a complex that stimulates the recruitment of the IL-1R accessory protein (IL-1RAcp). The cytoplasmic Toll-interleukin-1 receptor domain of IL-1RAcp transduces the signal to the MyD88/IRAK1/IRAK4 (myeloid differentiation primary response gene (88)/interleukin-1 receptor associated kinase 1/4) complex and TRAF (TNF receptor associated factor), which leads to the phosphorylation of NFK-B, ERK1/ERK2 (extracellular signal-related kinase 1/2), p38, and JNK (Janus kinase) [17]. This pattern of activation leads to the production of several proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines, such as IL-5, IL-13 [1], IL-1β, IL-6, IL-17, INF-γ (interferon gamma), and TNF-α (tumor necrosis factor alpha) [18]. In mast cells, IL-33 activates NFK-B via phospholipase D and sphingosine kinase by degrading the inhibitor of kappa B (IKB) and activation of NFK-B [19], which leads to the production of several proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines [20, 21]. Importantly, IL-33 induces degranulation in IgE-primed mast cells [19] and IL-33 can induce the production of IgE in an IL4-dependent fashion in the absence of any allergen [22]. Table 1 summarizes the role of the IL-1 family members in tissue repair and osteoclastogenesis, comparing the effects of IL-33 to the other members.

Common nameIL-1 family nameCell type presentRole in tissue repair and fibrosis during inflammationRole in osteoclastogenesis

IL-1 [1, 22]IL-1F1(i) Keratinocytes, thymic epithelium, hepatocytes, endothelial cells, fibroblasts, epithelial cells of mucus membranes (intracellular) [23]
(ii) Lymphocytes or macrophages activated [23, 24]
(i) Role in the early stages of inflammation [32]
(ii) Leukocyte recruitment by endothelial cells [32]
(iii) Fibroblasts proliferation and collagen synthesis [32]
Activation of osteoclasts [22]

IL-1 [1, 22, 32]IL-1F2(i) Monocytes, macrophages, dendritic cells (DC), B lymphocytes, NK cells [22, 32]
(ii) Gingival fibroblasts [30, 33]
(iii) Macrophages, monocytes [24, 32]
(iv) Th1 lymphocyte [32]
(v) Osteoblasts [31]
(i) Regulates the production of metalloproteinases [30, 33]
(ii) Induction and proliferation of fibroblasts and collagen [30, 33]
(iii) Stimulates the release of PDGF and TGF- [30, 35]
(iv) Fibroblast proliferation and collagen synthesis [30, 33]
(i) Differentiation and activation of osteoclast [22, 24]
(ii) Increases synthesis of collagenase [22]
(iii) Increases bone resorption [22]

IL-1Ra [1, 15, 16, 27]IL-F3Macrophages [27](i) Pleiotropic actions [27]
(ii) Inhibits the production of metalloproteinases (MMPs) [30, 33]
Blocks the activation of osteoclasts [31]

IL-33 [1]IL-F11(i) Endothelial and epithelial cells [2]
(ii) Macrophages [15]
(iii) Neutrophils [14]
(iv) Basophiles [12, 13]
(v) Eosinophils [11, 12]
(vi) Th2 cells, mast cells, osteoblasts, and osteoclast [1, 19, 20]
(i) In physiological conditions are in balance, maintaining the structure of the tissue [39]
(ii) Stimulates the formation of collagen and a protective function against infections [14]
(iii) Produced by Th2-phenotype cells [9]
(iv) Anti-inflammatory response as the augmentation of Th2 response [37]
(i) Monocyte differentiation into osteoclasts [40]
(ii) Leading to the production of RANKL and diminishing the production of OPG and subsequent activation of osteoclasts [40]
(iii) Inhibits the TNF- -induced bone destruction via IL-33/ST2 axis [38]

2. The Role of Interleukin-33 in Inflammatory Bone Disease

IL-33 is a double-edged sword: while it has a protective function against parasitic infections [2325] and sepsis [15], it also has a destructive role in several inflammatory diseases, principally allergic-type diseases [1, 26]. In the synovium of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, elevated levels of IL-33 and sST2 were detected [27]. IL-33 is eminent in collagen-induced arthritis animals [28] and the inhibition of IL-33 attenuates the disease in these animals [18]. Additionally, Zaiss and colleagues performed assays in human TNF-α-overexpressing transgenic mice [29]. These animals develop spontaneous joint inflammation and cartilage destruction, but the administration of IL-33 inhibits the TNF-α-induced bone destruction via the IL-33/ST2 axis. Interestingly, increased levels of IL-33 in RA patients were correlated with interstitial lung diseases and bone erosion [30].

2.1. The Role of Interleukin-33 in Bone Homeostasis

The bone is a dynamic tissue with a complex remodeling nature. The remodeling process is orchestrated principally by three cell types: osteoblasts, osteoclasts, osteocytes, and their precursors. In physiological conditions, bone anabolism (bone formation) and bone catabolism (bone resorption) are in balance, maintaining the structure of the tissue. Bone remodeling mainly takes place adjacent to blood vessels, allowing a rapid exchange of byproducts and mediators from bone to blood and vice versa [31]. Additionally, bone remodeling is modulated by endocrine and paracrine mediators [32], as well as through immunological modulation by T cells [33], B cells [34], and through neural modulation [35].

Osteoblasts are derived from the embryonic mesoderm. Their differentiation is dependent on several factors. In early stages, bone morphogenic proteins (BMPs), transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β), fibroblast growth factors (FGFs), and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) have roles in stem cell differentiation to determined osteoprogenitors. At later stages, PTH (parathyroid hormone), 1,25-(OH)2D3, insulin-like growth factor (IGF), and TGF-β have roles in the differentiation of determined osteoprogenitors to mature osteoblasts and eventually to osteocytes [36].

Osteoclasts are large multinucleated cells that are derived from hematopoietic monocyte/macrophage precursors. Their differentiation and activation are directly or indirectly dependent on numerous growth factors, cytokines, and hormones. These include PTH, PTHrP (parathyroid hormone related protein), IL-1, IL-6, IL-11, FGFs, IGF, RANKL (receptor activator of NFK-B ligand), M-CSF (macrophage colony stimulating factor), and TNF-α (tumor necrosis factor alpha). M-CSF is responsible for the differentiation of the precursors to preosteoclasts [36, 37]. RANKL, the ligand of RANK and OPG (osteoprotegerin), which is a decoy receptor, is produced by T cells and osteoblasts and is responsible for osteoclast differentiation from preosteoclasts and osteoclast activation [38]. M-CSF and RANKL are the main factors in osteoclastogenesis, as will be discussed later.

As aforementioned, bone remodeling is also modulated by the immune system, and some researchers have studied the role of IL-33 in this context. Mun and colleagues [39] studied the differentiation of osteoclasts from human CD14+ monocytes, which is an osteoclast progenitor. These cells express ST2 on their surfaces, indicating a possible role of IL-33 in this process. Therefore, monocytes were cultivated in the presence of M-CSF and IL-33 or M-CSF and RANKL. Both cultures developed well-differentiated osteoclasts, as tested by TRAP (tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase, a marker of terminated differentiated osteoclasts), and the culture provided with IL-33 showed differentiation even in the presence of OPG or anti-RANKL antibody, showing RANKL-independent differentiation. Additionally, IL-33 activated all of the downstream signaling events in these cells (i.e., phosphorylation of ERK1/2, JNK, and NFK-B) and enhanced the association of NFK-B with DNA, which increased the expression of several transcription factors of osteoclast maturation, including TRAF6 (TNF receptor associated factor 6), NFATc1 (nuclear factor of activated T cells, cytoplasmic 1), c-Fos, and Syk, all of which are known to regulate osteoclast differentiation in RANKL-stimulated monocytes. Importantly, IL-33 caused the production of bone resorption factors (c-Src and cathepsin K), showing the differentiation of viable osteoclasts. It is important to note that RANKL and IL-33 increase the expression of ST2, suggesting positive feedback. Accordantly, the possible role of IL-33 in osteoclast differentiation is represented in Figure 1.

Nonetheless, other researchers have obtained different results. Saidi and colleagues [40] performed a study similar to that of Mun and colleagues. They used bone marrow stromal cells for osteoblast differentiation assays and CD14+ mononuclear cells from peripheral blood of healthy patients for osteoclast differentiation. First, they detected IL-33 mRNA levels in bone tissue (ex vivo), mainly in the bone marrow. In vitro assays showed expression of IL-33 in osteoblasts in these samples. Surprisingly, they found that IL-33 expression was not constitutive but was mainly inducible by TNF-α and IL-1β in these two cell samples. They incubated TNF-α and IL-1β pretreated samples of bone marrow stromal cells and CD14+ mononuclear cells with IL-33. They observed that IL-33 did not significantly alter the mRNA levels of ST2L when compared to the cells that had only been pretreated with TNF-α and IL-1β. These findings indicate a redundant role of IL-33 when compared to TNF-α and IL-1β in the production of ST2 via positive feedback. Moreover, the stimulation of CD14+ monocytes with IL-33 in the presence of M-CSF that was or was not associated with RANKL did not alter osteoclast differentiation, which was consistent with their finding that CD14+ did not constitutively express ST2L mRNA. Saidi and colleagues concluded that IL-33 is involved in the bone inflammatory status but not in normal bone homeostasis because the IL-33 and ST2L mRNA levels were increased in the presence of inflammatory cytokines. Other results suggested that IL-33 is regulated by osteogenic factors and the inhibitory effects of IL-33 may be dependent on auxiliary cells. Saleh et al. [41] demonstrated that IL-33 induced matrix mineralization deposition in primary osteoblasts. This may explain the osteogenic effects of oncostatin M and parathyroid hormone (PTH) since they induced higher expression of mRNA IL-33 in osteoblasts. Also they described that IL-33 has inhibitory effect in M-CSF/RANKL bone marrow macrophage or RAW264.7 only in the presence of osteoblast, T cells, or mature macrophages suggesting that IL-33 may act through these cells. Thus, IL-33 may not inhibit osteoclast directly in the precursor cells (preosteoclasts). Moreover, they found that the levels of IL-33 mRNA in bone marrow cells, especially osteoblast lineages, are regulated by PTH and oncostatin M.

Schulze and colleagues [42] performed assays in wild-type and mice (ST2 null) and cell cultures. They found that osteoblasts gradually increased IL-33 mRNA expression during the course of differentiation. Osteoblasts treated with IL-33 did not alter bone formation but reduced the production of OPG and increased the production of several cytokines that influenced osteoclastogenesis (e.g., RANKL, IL-1, and IL-6). Although these data suggest an indirect role of the IL-33-osteoblast axis in osteoclast differentiation, further assays demonstrated the opposite result. By analyzing the bone mass of ST2-deficient mice, Schulze and colleagues demonstrated that the density of bone tissue decreased with higher numbers of osteoclasts, indicating an inhibitory role of IL-33/ST2 axis in osteoclastogenesis. To confirm this assertion, Schulze and colleagues performed another experiment: isolated bone marrow cells from wild-type mice did not differentiate into osteoclasts when treated with 1,25-(OH)2D3 plus IL-33. When investigating this matter, they found that IL-33 induced the expression of eosinophil and M2 macrophage gene markers and decreased osteoclastogenesis markers in these bone marrow cells. In addition, they observed that IL-33 induced its own production and enhanced the production of ST2 in these cells, suggesting a shift in cell fate during differentiation that impeded osteoclastogenesis. They also found that the inhibitory role of IL-33 in osteoclastogenesis was not due to the production of IL-4 and IL-13, cytokines that are known to inhibit osteoclastogenesis, but by IL-33-stimulated Th2 cells through the inhibition of signal transducer and activator of transcription 6 (STAT6) (a downstream mediator of the IL-4 and IL-13 signaling pathway). Assays performed in CD11b+ mouse leukocytes showed an inhibitory role of IL-33 in osteoclastogenesis, but not total inhibition. In summary, these findings showed a direct, antiosteoclastogenesis role of IL-33, at least in mice.

Keller and colleagues [43], who are part of the same team as Schulze, performed assays to emphasize their previous work. They induced the overexpression of IL-33 in the osteoblasts of transgenic mice and these cells were able to produce more bone matrix in vitro, but they did not affect bone formation in vivo. Importantly, no significant differences in the IL-33 serum concentrations or in the populations of eosinophils, neutrophils, basophils, or M2 macrophages of wild-type and transgenic animals were observed, indicating selective expression of IL-33 only in osteoblasts, which only impacts the bone environment. However, the most important finding was that the bone of transgenic mice showed a decreased population of osteoclasts. This was a robust finding that indicated that IL-33 inhibits osteoclastogenesis in vivo in mice.

Another team had similar findings. Zaiss and colleagues performed assays in human TNF-α-overexpressing, transgenic mice [29]. These animals developed spontaneous joint inflammation and cartilage destruction and the administration of IL-33 inhibited the TNF-α-induced bone destruction via the IL-33/ST2 axis, which was confirmed using an ST2 agonist antibody that triggered the same downstream regulators. Additionally, cartilage destruction was ameliorated by IL-33 and the osteoclast markers TRAP and NFATc1 was reduced. Importantly, the same ST2 agonist antibody was able to reduce the osteoclast population in the treated animals. They also reconstituted irradiated transgenic animals with the bone marrow of or animals and they observed increased bone erosion and osteoclast numbers in the animals reconstituted with bone marrow of . Treatment with IL-33 did not lead to a significant difference in the level of serum RANKL or OPG but increased the levels of IL-4, INF-γ, and GM-CSF. These findings show that IL-33 inhibits osteoclast formation through the production of antiosteoclastogenic cytokines, which shifts the mononuclear differentiation toward alternatively activated macrophages and dendritic cell differentiation. This group subsequently directly analyzed the role of IL-33 using osteoclast precursors (CD11b+) in vitro. Interestingly, the expression of ST2 in CD11b+ cells was low (10%) at the beginning of the experiment and increased (up to 70%) during osteoclast differentiation. After the addition of IL-33 at different times, in the presence or absence of RANKL or TNF-α, an antiosteoclastogenic role of IL-33 was revealed only at early stages by shifting the differentiation fate of the precursors. Moreover, they purified CD11b+ cells from human bone marrow and cultured them with RANKL and M-CSF, and the addition of IL-33 reduced the osteoclast population. In agreement with the works of Mun and Saidi, CD14+ peripheral blood cells are less responsive to the suppressive effect of IL-33, suggesting that in humans, as in mice, IL-33 inhibits osteoclastogenesis at early stages.

In summary, these works demonstrate the role of IL-33 in the homeostasis and the discrepancies can be explained in a simple way. An increasing number of studies suggest the existence of a highly heterogeneous subset of circulating cells in humans and mice [44]. Thus, the cells used in some works may be in a later stage of differentiation that prevents the antiosteoclastogenic role of IL-33 in the precursor cells. Notably, these works were able to detect a RANKL-independent and an indirect inhibitory role of IL-33 that stimulates the production of cytokines and shifts precursor differentiation at early stages. Importantly, the proinflammatory role of IL-33 in RA-induced animal models is mediated through mast cell degranulation [18, 28], which most likely explains the protective effect of IL-33. Finally, all of these works demonstrated constitutive expression of IL-33 in the bone, but they only studied the IL-33/ST2 axis. These studies did not demonstrate the role of IL-33 as a nuclear factor, and such strategy would most likely uncover new physiological modulation roles of IL-33 in bone homeostasis.

Additionally, these works did not consider the effects of the IL-33/ST2 axis. The inhibition of ST2 expression will affect several cells that express ST2 in their surfaces, such as mast cells, which are clearly known to trigger proinflammatory profiles. Studies of the production of IL-33-overexpressing osteoblasts have concentrated on the role of IL-33 in osteoclastogenesis, but they have disregarded the systemic effect of IL-33, thus reducing the role of IL-33 to only microenvironmental levels. It is important to state these biases, especially when studying osteoclastogenesis. As we mentioned, osteoclastogenesis is induced by proinflammatory cytokines, which are produced principally by Th1 cells and their overexpression only at microenvironmental levels conflicts with these events. We can hypothesize this because of work on TNF-α overexpression: TNF-α is a proinflammatory cytokine that induces osteoclastogenesis, and the administration of IL-33 in these animals most likely induces a Th2 profile that causes the antiosteoclastogenic effect via IL-4. This does not contradict the work of Shulze and colleagues, who inhibited STAT6 and observed a Th2-independent role of IL-33 in inhibiting osteoclastogenesis. A simple way to argue this is that they inhibited a downstream effect of the IL-4 and IL-13 pathways (e.g., STAT6) but not of INF-γ.

3. The Possible Role of IL-33 in Periodontal Disease

Periodontal disease is an infectious disease that is associated with pathogenic microorganisms, which have been implicated as the primary etiologic factors in inflammatory periodontal disease. This disease affects the supporting structures of teeth, which leads to their progressive destruction and finally tooth loss. The immune system participates in the evolution of periodontitis, which indicates that bacterial antigens trigger an immunopathological reaction and that the host response to this infection is an important factor in determining the extent and severity of the disease [45].

Mast cells have an important role in this disease. Inflammation causes the destruction of tissue, including healthy tissue. After activation, mast cells express histamines, leukotrienes, prostanoids, proteases, cytokines, and chemokines, thus attracting neutrophils to the site of infection, which will ultimately eliminate the bacteria. Mast cells may participate in the pathogenesis of inflammation of periodontal disease. However, mast cells are detected in inflamed and healing gingiva. Lagdive et al. [46] stated that chronic periodontitis cases had higher mast cell counts compared to gingivitis sites or healthy tissues. Huang et al. [47] demonstrated a strong correlation between the densities of mast cells, their degranulation, and the severity of human periodontitis. Therefore, mast cell degranulation may contribute to the progression of periodontal disease.

IL-33 most likely has three roles in relation to periodontal disease: as an alarmin, a chemoattractant, and a systemic cytokine (Table 2). The release of IL-33, when acting as an alarmin, results in the destruction of several cells by necrosis, mainly fibroblasts and epithelial cells [1, 2]. In the context of inflammatory disease, IL-33 will induce other responses: mast cell degranulation and the production of proinflammatory cells (i.e., macrophages, eosinophils, and basophils). The release of inflammatory mediators and IL-33 will induce the activation of osteoblasts, which leads to the production of RANKL and diminishes the production of OPG [40] and the subsequent activation of osteoclasts. Importantly, in concordance with [39], IL-33 most likely induces osteoclast activation by increasing osteoclast transcription factors. It is well known and we have previously cited that IL-33 is involved in the anti-inflammatory response as an augmentation of the Th2 response. However, we believe that, in the context of periodontal disease, the levels of proinflammatory cytokines are extremely high due to the bacterial infection and, therefore, the osteoclastogenesis is favored. Additionally, the degranulation of mast cells in addition to the inflammation state will produce awareness of the circulating monocytes, and, in this microenvironment, they will differentiate into osteoclasts. This finding is in accordance with previously cited works that found a protective role of IL-33 inhibition in RA-induced animals [18, 28] and increased bone erosion in RA patients with IL-33 increased serum levels [30].

Common nameIL-1 family namePeriodontal disease (PD) association

IL-1 [1, 22]IL-1F1(i) Increased in gingival crevicular fluid (indicative of the severity of PD) [25, 26]
(ii) Associated with probing depth and attachment loss [26, 27]
(iii) Influx of neutrophils and monocytes [28, 29]
(iv) Stimulation of the production of PGE2 [30, 31]

IL-1 [1, 22, 32]IL-1F2(i) Increased in gingival crevicular fluid [26, 33]
(ii) Induce the production of prostaglandin by fibroblasts, monocytes, and macrophages [30, 33]
(iii) Potentiate the effect of TNF- (synergistic effect) [18, 22, 34]

IL-1Ra [1, 15, 16, 27]IL-F3(i) Inflammatory mediators [27]
(ii) Reduction indicates severity of the PD [27]

IL-33 [1]IL-F11(i) IL-33 can be produced in response to bacterial presence [36]
(ii) Act as “alarm,” as chemoattractant, and as a systemic cytokine [7, 25]
(iii) Produce several of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines [1, 7, 19, 20]
(iv) Mast cell degranulation [37]
(v) Destruction of fibroblasts and epithelial cells by necrosis [37]
(vi) TNF- overexpressing [38]

Thus, we hypothesize that, in periodontal diseases, IL-33 has an osteoclastogenic role by inducing differentiation of monocytes toward proinflammatory cells that leads to the degranulation of mast cells and, therefore, the elevation of the levels of osteoclastogenic factors, thus causing osteoclast differentiation. Additionally, we believe that proinflammatory cytokines induce osteoblasts to express IL-33, which acts paracrinally (mast cells degranulation) and autocrinally (to produce RANKL and decrease OPG production). Surprisingly, according to Mun, IL-33 directly effects CD14+ cell differentiation in osteoclasts, and this phenomenon is independent of the RANKL-RANK axis [39] (Figure 2).

To confirm these hypotheses, it is necessary to perform at least three, large groups of experiments. One work would involve studying the osteoclastogenic potential of circulating monocytes in periodontal disease patients in the presence of TNF-α and RANKL with or without IL-33. We believe that monocytes from periodontal disease patients are strongly sensitized to differentiate into osteoclasts. A second work would be the study of the effects of IL-33 in circulating monocytes and bone marrow from periodontitis-induced animals, which is similar to the previously proposed work. A third work, which would be similar to the work of Schulze and colleagues, would involve analyzing the effect of the ST2 receptor, the production of proinflammatory cytokines and IL-33, osteoclast formation, and bone erosion in knockout mice with periodontitis. These works would highlight the role of IL-33 in osteoclast differentiation and/or activation in an inflamed microenvironment.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


  1. J. Schmitz, A. Owyang, E. Oldham et al., “IL-33, an interleukin-1-like cytokine that signals via the IL-1 receptor-related protein ST2 and induces T helper type 2-associated cytokines,” Immunity, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 479–490, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. A. D. Joshi, S. R. Oak, A. J. Hartigan et al., “Interleukin-33 contributes to both M1 and M2 chemokine marker expression in human macrophages,” BMC Immunology, vol. 11, article no. 52, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S.-I. Tominaga, K. Kuroiwa, K. Tago, H. Iwahana, K. Yanagisawa, and N. Komatsu, “Presence and expression of a novel variant form of ST2 gene product in human leukemic cell line UT-7/GM,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 264, no. 1, pp. 14–18, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. H. Hayakawa, M. Hayakawa, A. Kume, and S.-I. Tominaga, “Soluble ST2 blocks interleukin-33 signaling in allergic airway inflammation,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 282, no. 36, pp. 26369–26380, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. C. Cayrol and J.-P. Girard, “The IL-1-like cytokine IL-33 is inactivated after maturation by caspase-1,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 22, pp. 9021–9026, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. E. Lefrançais, S. Roga, V. Gautier et al., “IL-33 is processed into mature bioactive forms by neutrophil elastase and cathepsin G,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 109, no. 5, pp. 1673–1678, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. C. J. Nile, E. Barksby, P. Jitprasertwong, P. M. Preshaw, and J. J. Taylor, “Expression and regulation of interleukin-33 in human monocytes,” Immunology, vol. 130, no. 2, pp. 172–180, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. G. Haraldsen, J. Balogh, J. Pollheimer, J. Sponheim, and A. M. Küchler, “Interleukin-33—cytokine of dual function or novel alarmin?” Trends in Immunology, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 227–233, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. L. Roussel, M. Erard, C. Cayrol, and J.-P. Girard, “Molecular mimicry between IL-33 and KSHV for attachment to chromatin through the H2A-H2B acidic pocket,” EMBO Reports, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 1006–1012, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. M. A. Rank, T. Kobayashi, H. Kozaki, K. R. Bartemes, D. L. Squillace, and H. Kita, “IL-33-activated dendritic cells induce an atypical TH2-type response,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 123, no. 5, pp. 1047–1054, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. M. Komai-Koma, D. Xu, Y. Li, A. N. J. McKenzie, I. B. McInnes, and F. Y. Liew, “IL-33 is a chemoattractant for human Th2 cells,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 2779–2786, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. W. B. Cherry, J. Yoon, K. R. Bartemes, K. Iijima, and H. Kita, “A novel IL-1 family cytokine, IL-33, potently activates human eosinophils,” The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 121, no. 6, pp. 1484–1490, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. T. Pecaric-Petkovic, S. A. Didichenko, S. Kaempfer, N. Spiegl, and C. A. Dahinden, “Human basophils and eosinophils are the direct target leukocytes of the novel IL-1 family member IL-33,” Blood, vol. 113, no. 7, pp. 1526–1534, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. D. Smithgall, M. R. Comeau, B.-R. Park Yoon, D. Kaufman, R. Armitage, and D. E. Smith, “IL-33 amplifies both Th1- and Th2-type responses through its activity on human basophils, allergen-reactive Th 2 cells, iNKT and NK Cells,” International Immunology, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 1019–1030, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. J. C. Alves-Filho, F. Snego, F. O. Souto et al., “Interleukin-33 attenuates sepsis by enhancing neutrophil influx to the site of infection,” Nature Medicine, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 708–712, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. M. Kurowska-Stolarska, B. Stolarski, P. Kewin et al., “IL-33 amplifies the polarization of alternatively activated macrophages that contribute to airway inflammation,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 183, no. 10, pp. 6469–6477, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. A. A. Chackerian, E. R. Oldham, E. E. Murphy, J. Schmitz, S. Pflanz, and R. A. Kastelein, “IL-1 receptor accessory protein and ST2 comprise the IL-33 receptor complex,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 179, no. 4, pp. 2551–2555, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  18. G. Palmer, D. Talabot-Ayer, C. Lamacchia et al., “Inhibition of interleukin-33 signaling attenuates the severity of experimental arthritis,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 738–749, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. P. N. Pushparaj, K. T. Hwee, C. H. Shiau et al., “The cytokine interleukin-33 mediates anaphylactic shock,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 24, pp. 9773–9778, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. Z. Allakhverdi, D. E. Smith, M. R. Comeau, and G. Delespesse, “Cutting edge: the ST2 ligand IL-33 potently activates and drives maturation of human mast cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 179, no. 4, pp. 2051–2054, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  21. D. Moulin, O. Donzé, D. Talabot-Ayer, F. Mézin, G. Palmer, and C. Gabay, “Interleukin (IL)-33 induces the release of pro-inflammatory mediators by mast cells,” Cytokine, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 216–225, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. M. Komai-Koma, F. Brombacher, P. N. Pushparaj et al., “Interleukin-33 amplifies IgE synthesis and triggers mast cell degranulation via interleukin-4 in naive mice,” Allergy, vol. 67, no. 9, pp. 1118–1126, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  23. P. Kropf, S. Herath, R. Klemenz, and I. Müller, “Signaling through the T1/ST2 molecule is not necessary for Th2 differentiation but is important for the regulation of type 1 responses in nonhealing Leishmania major infection,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 1961–1971, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. L. A. Jones, F. Roberts, M. B. Nickdel et al., “IL-33 receptor (T1/ST2) signalling is necessary to prevent the development of encephalitis in mice infected with Toxoplasma gondii,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 426–436, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. N. E. Humphreys, D. Xu, M. R. Hepworth, F. Y. Liew, and R. K. Grencis, “IL-33, a potent inducer of adaptive immunity to intestinal nematodes,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 180, no. 4, pp. 2443–2449, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  26. C. A. Dinarello, “An IL-1 family member requires caspase-1 processing and signals through the ST2 receptor,” Immunity, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 461–462, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. Y.-S. Hong, S.-J. Moon, Y.-B. Joo et al., “Measurement of interleukin-33 (IL-33) and IL-33 receptors (sST2 and ST2L) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis,” Journal of Korean Medical Science, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 1132–1139, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. D. Xu, H.-R. Jiang, P. Kewin et al., “IL-33 exacerbates antigen-induced arthritis by activating mast cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 31, pp. 10913–10918, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. M. M. Zaiss, M. Kurowska-Stolarska, C. Böhm et al., “IL-33 shifts the balance from osteoclast to alternatively activated macrophage differentiation and protects from TNF-α-mediated bone loss,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 186, no. 11, pp. 6097–6105, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. Z. Xiangyang, Y. Lutian, Z. Lin, X. Liping, S. Hui, and L. Jing, “Increased levels of interleukin-33 associated with bone erosion and interstitial lung diseases in patients with rheumatoid arthritis,” Cytokine, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 6–9, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. T. L. Andersen, T. E. Sondergaard, K. E. Skorzynska et al., “A physical mechanism for coupling bone resorption and formation in adult human bone,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 174, no. 1, pp. 239–247, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. C. R. Walkley, J. M. Shea, N. A. Sims, L. E. Purton, and S. H. Orkin, “Rb Regulates Interactions between hematopoietic stem cells and their bone marrow microenvironment,” Cell, vol. 129, no. 6, pp. 1081–1095, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. M. T. Gillespie, “Impact of cytokines and T lymphocytes upon osteoclast differentiation and function,” Arthritis Research and Therapy, vol. 9, no. 2, article 103, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. M. C. Horowitz and J. A. Lorenzo, “B lymphocytes and the skeleton,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1117, pp. 82–93, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. F. Elefteriou, “Regulation of bone remodeling by the central and peripheral nervous system,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 473, no. 2, pp. 231–236, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. D. J. Papachristou, E. K. Basdra, and A. G. Papavassiliou, “Bone metastases: molecular mechanisms and novel therapeutic interventions,” Medicinal Research Reviews, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 611–636, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. W. C. Dougall, “Molecular pathways: osteoclast-dependent and osteoclast-independent roles of the RANKL/RANK/OPG pathway in tumorigenesis and metastasis,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 326–335, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. Y.-Y. Kong, H. Yoshida, I. Sarosi et al., “OPGL is a key regulator of osteoclastogenesis, lymphocyte development and lymph-node organogenesis,” Nature, vol. 397, no. 6717, pp. 315–323, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. S. H. Mun, N. Y. Ko, H. S. Kim et al., “Interleukin-33 stimulates formation of functional osteoclasts from human CD14(+) monocytes,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 67, no. 22, pp. 3883–3892, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. S. Saidi, F. Bouri, P. Lencel et al., “IL-33 is expressed in human osteoblasts, but has no direct effect on bone remodeling,” Cytokine, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 347–354, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. H. Saleh, D. Eeles, J. M. Hodge et al., “Interleukin-33, a target of parathyroid hormone and oncostatin m, increases osteoblastic matrix mineral deposition and inhibits osteoclast formation in vitro,” Endocrinology, vol. 152, no. 5, pp. 1911–1922, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. J. Schulze, T. Bickert, F. T. Beil et al., “Interleukin-33 is expressed in differentiated osteoblasts and blocks osteoclast formation from bone marrow precursor cells,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 704–717, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. J. Keller, P. Catala-Lehnen, K. Wintges et al., “Transgenic over-expression of interleukin-33 in osteoblasts results in decreased osteoclastogenesis,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 417, no. 1, pp. 217–222, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. F. Geissmann, M. G. Manz, S. Jung, M. H. Sieweke, M. Merad, and K. Ley, “Development of monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells,” Science, vol. 327, no. 5966, pp. 656–661, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. R. A. Kayal, “The role of osteoimmunology in periodontal disease,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2013, Article ID 639368, 12 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. S. S. Lagdive, S. B. Lagdive, A. Mani, R. Anarthe et al., “Correlation of mast cells in periodontal diseases,” Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 63–67, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  47. S. Huang, F. Lu, Y. Chen, B. Huang, and M. Liu, “Mast cell degranulation in human periodontitis,” Journal of Periodontology, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 248–255, 2013. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Felipe Andrés Cordero da Luz et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

2017 Views | 775 Downloads | 16 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.