Mediators of Inflammation

Mediators of Inflammation / 2015 / Article
Special Issue

Regulation of Cytokines in Cancer Pain

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 523896 |

Ruirui Pan, Huiting Di, Jinming Zhang, Zhangxiang Huang, Yuming Sun, Weifeng Yu, Feixiang Wu, "Inducible Lentivirus-Mediated siRNA against TLR4 Reduces Nociception in a Rat Model of Bone Cancer Pain", Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 2015, Article ID 523896, 7 pages, 2015.

Inducible Lentivirus-Mediated siRNA against TLR4 Reduces Nociception in a Rat Model of Bone Cancer Pain

Academic Editor: Zhong Xie
Received18 May 2015
Revised26 Jul 2015
Accepted10 Aug 2015
Published18 Oct 2015


Although bone cancer pain is still not fully understood by scientists and clinicians alike, studies suggest that toll like receptor 4 (TLR4) plays an important role in the initiation and/or maintenance of pathological pain state in bone cancer pain. A promising treatment for bone cancer pain is the downregulation of TLR4 by RNA interference; however, naked siRNA (small interference RNA) is not effective in long-term treatments. In order to concoct a viable prolonged treatment for bone cancer pain, an inducible lentivirus LvOn-siTLR4 (tetracycline inducible lentivirus carrying siRNA targeting TLR4) was prepared and the antinociception effects were observed in bone cancer pain rats induced by Walker 256 cells injection in left leg. Results showed that LvOn-siTLR4 intrathecal injection with doxycycline (Dox) oral administration effectively reduced the nociception induced by Walker 256 cells while inhibiting the mRNA and protein expression of TLR4. Proinflammatory cytokines as TNF-α and IL-1β in spinal cord were also decreased. These findings suggest that TLR4 could be a target for bone cancer pain treatment and tetracycline inducible lentivirus LvOn-siTLR4 represents a new potential option for long-term treatment of bone cancer pain.

1. Introduction

Cancer-induced bone pain, characterized by spontaneous pain, hyperalgesia, and allodynia, is estimated to affect about 36%–50% of cancer patients [1]. Severe and long-lasting pain brings agonies to people’s daily life, especially for those terminal cancer patients [2]. However, the treatment of bone cancer pain remains a clinical challenge. New methods are urgently needed for this worldwide problem.

Bone cancer pain is considered to be mechanistically unique compared with inflammatory or neuropathic pain states [3]. The activation and upregulation of glial cells in the spinal cord play an important role in initiation and/or maintenance of pathological pain state in bone cancer pain [4, 5]. One of the neuron-to-glial activation signals has proposed that proinflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-α, were released via the microglial TLR4 receptor in a rat model of bone cancer pain [6]. Administration of a potent TLR4 antagonist (FP-1) reduced both thermal hyperalgesia and mechanical allodynia in the chronic constrictive injury (CCI) models of mice [7]. Thus, blocking the TLR4 signaling pathway might be a useful way of treating bone cancer pain.

RNA interference (RNAi) technique, a promising and potent gene-silencing method, has demonstrated a clinical potential of treating chronic pain by synthetic small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) or short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) [8]. The key point of this technique is to obtain small interfering RNAs with high “knockdown” efficiency. In the previous work, we screened siRNA sequence with reporter vector and obtained a siRNA against TLR4 with high efficiency [9]. Intrathecal injection of this TLR4 siRNA reduced nociception in a neuropathic pain model of rats [9]. However, the antinociception only lasted for 4 days with naked siRNA. For prolonged antinociception effect, a lentiviral system was addressed in the present study. Meanwhile, for controlling of the targeted gene expression, a tetracycline-regulated gene expression (Tet-on) system was addressed to regulate the expression of small RNA of TLR4. In this system, the targeted gene expression is turned on under the control of doxycycline or tetracycline (Tet). Thus, the antinociception of siRNA expressed by inducible lentivirus was detected in a bone cancer pain model of rats and the inducible effect of doxycycline was observed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Production and Identification of Inducible Lentivirus LvOn-siTLR4

The siRNA (GUCUCAGAUAUCUAGAUCU) against TLR4 gene (GenBank accession NM_019178) was screened and tested as described in our previous study [9]. Based on the “Tuschl” principle and the sequences of the inducible lentiviral vector, target sequences were designed and chemically synthesized in United Gene Company (Shanghai, China). The target sequences were then cloned into plasmid pLenR-TRIP and named pLenR-TRIP-TLR4. To produce recombinant inducible lentivirus LvOn-siTLR4 (lentivirus expressing siRNA of TLR4), pRsv-REV (20 μg), pMDlg-pRRE (15 μg), and pMD2G (10 μg) were cotransfected into HEK 293T cells with Lipofectamine 2000 [10, 11]. About 48 h after transfection, the lentivirus was harvested. The final titer of recombinant lentivirus was adjusted to 1 × 109 TU/mL.

2.2. Induction of Bone Cancer

Bone cancer was induced by Walker 256 cells (breast tumor cells) as we previously described [12]. The left leg was shaved and the skin was disinfected with 70% (v/v) ethanol, after rats were anesthetized by intraperitoneal administration of sodium pentobarbital (40 mg/kg). A rostrocaudal incision of 1 cm was made in the skin over the lower one-third of the tibia for clear exposure with minimal damage to nerves and muscles. The medullary canal was approached by inserting a 23-gauge needle proximally through a hole drilled in the tibia. The needle was then replaced with a 20 μL microinjection syringe. A 10 μL volume of Walker 256 cells (2 × 105 cells) or boiled cells (sham group) was injected into the bone cavity. The syringe was removed after a 2 min delay allowing cells to fill the cavity. The drill hole was sealed with bone wax and the wound was closed using 1-0 silk threads. The rats were allowed unrestricted movement in the cages after recovery and the general condition of rats was monitored during the experiment.

2.3. Lumbar Subarachnoid Catheterization

Rats were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (40 mg/kg, i.p.). A PE-10 catheter (Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD, USA) was inserted into the lumbar subarachnoid space between lumbar vertebrae 5 (L5) and L6 [13]. The catheter was chronically implanted and the external part of the indwelling catheter was protected according to Milligan’s method [14]. A lidocaine test was given to determine the functionality and position of the catheter tip in the subarachnoid space.

2.4. Intrathecal Delivery of Lentivirus

Rats were randomly divided into 6 groups ( per group): a sham group (sham surgery + normal saline), a normal saline (NS) group (cancer + NS), an Lv-MM group (cancer + Lv-MM), an LvOn-siTLR4 group (cancer + LvOn-siTLR4 + NS), a Dox group (cancer + Dox), and an LvOn-siTLR4 with Dox group (cancer + LvOn-siTLR4 + Dox). Lentivirus Lv-MM expressing scrambled siRNA (TTCTCCGAACGTGTCACGT) was used as a control. Four days after cancer cells injection, rats in the LvOn-siTLR4 group and LvOn-siTLR4 with Dox group were given the virus LvOn-siTLR4 (1 × 107 TU/10 μL), respectively. In the Lv-MM group, the same titer of the lentivirus Lv-MM was given intrathecally as a control. The normal saline of equal volume was administered intrathecally in rats of remaining 3 groups. In the Dox group and LvOn-siTLR4 with Dox group, doxycycline was given orally.

2.5. Mechanical Allodynia Test

To assess mechanical hyperalgesia, animals were acclimated daily for 10 min/day to the test environment during 3 days, which was a Plexiglass box on a metal grid surface. On test days, rats were allowed to acclimate for 5–10 min. The nociceptive stimulus, a single rigid filament attached to a hand-held transducer (Electronic von Frey Anesthesiometer; IITC, Woodland Hills, CA), was applied perpendicularly to the medial surface of the hind paw with increasing force. The endpoint was taken as nocifensive paw withdrawal accompanied by head turning, biting, and/or licking. As soon as this reaction occurred, the required pressure was indicated in grams, and this value was considered to be the individual paw withdrawal threshold (PWT) value. Each rat was tested in triplicate per time point and the average for the three measurements was then calculated.

2.6. Spinal Cord RNA Extraction and Real-Time PCR

The real-time PCR was performed on the 1st, 3rd, 7th, 14th, and 21st days after intrathecal injection of the virus. Total RNA (6 samples of each group) was extracted from L4-L5 spinal cord. Extracted RNA was treated with DNase I at 37°C for 30 min before reverse transcription was performed using a kit (TaKaRa, Japan). The PCR primers were as follows: 5′-CGGGAG CTC TGA ATG CTC TCT TGC ATC TGG CTG GC-3′ (forward) and 5′-CGG GTC GAC GCC ATA CAA TTC GACCTG CTG-3′ (reverse). The Real-Time PCR Detection System (Roche, Switzerland) continually monitors the increase in fluorescence, which is directly proportional to the PCR product [15].

2.7. Western Blot Assay

The proteins of tissues from lumbar spinal cord (L4-L5) were prepared on the 7th day after injection as previously described [16]. Proteins were separated by 8% polyacrylamide SDS-PAGE and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane. The nitrocellulose membrane was blotted with a primary antibody against TLR4 (1 : 100, Santa Cruz, USA) and then with secondary antibody conjugated with horseradish peroxidase. Protein signals were detected with an ECL system (Amersham Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden). GAPDH (Sigma Chemical Co., MO, USA, 1 : 500) was used as a loading control. The images were captured and analyzed by ImageJ software.

2.8. Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)

To detect TNF-α and IL-1β proteins, samples from the spinal cord (L4-L5) were analyzed by ELISAs specific for these cytokines. The samples were prepared on the 1st, 3rd, 7th, 14th, and 21st days after intrathecal injection of the virus as previously described [17]. The ELISAs for TNF-α and IL-1β in the spinal tissue were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Peprotech, UK). Total protein concentrations of TNF-α and IL-1β were determined by the Bradford assay and used to adjust results for sample size [18].

2.9. Statistical Analysis

All data were expressed as mean ± standard error (SEM). Statistical analysis was carried out using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons using GraphPad Prism software (Version 5. GraphPad Software Inc., CA, USA). The data from western blotting was compared using one-way ANOVA. was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. LvOn-siTLR4 with Dox Attenuated Bone Cancer Pain

To examine the impact of inducible lentivirus LvOn-siTLR4 on pain response in vivo, modulation of pain perception in the bone cancer pain model was investigated. PWT was used to measure the mechanical allodynia. After surgery, mechanical allodynia was induced, in correspondence with the reduced PWT. Compared with that in the sham group, mechanical allodynia significantly increased in the rats receiving Walker 256 cells injection (, , Figure 1). In contrast to the Lv-MM group and NS group, mechanical allodynia was decreased in the LvOn-siTLR4 with DOX group on the 3rd, 7th, 14th, and 21st days after viral injection (), which suggested that the small RNA expressed by the lentivirus was effective. Meanwhile, in the LvOn-siTLR4 group, rats without Dox had no effect in mechanical allodynia, which illustrated that the expression of small RNA was induced by Dox. Moreover, PWT did not change in the Dox group compared to that in the NS group, suggesting that Dox did not contribute to the mechanical allodynia. The process lasted for about 21 days, which indicated that the antinociception effect of LvOn-siTLR4 was long-lasting.

3.2. LvOn-siTLR4 with DOX Decreased TLR4 Expression

LvOn-siTLR4 with DOX was intrathecally delivered into the rats with bone cancer pain and protein expressions of TLR4 and its mRNA were detected. As shown in Figure 2, TLR4 mRNA expression was increased significantly in the rats which received Walker 256 cells injection compared with that in the sham group (, ). Similar results were shown in the protein expression, which suggested that TLR4 increased in the bone cancer pain models (Figure 3). TLR4 and its mRNA expressions were decreased in the LvOn-siTLR4 with DOX group compared with that in other four groups of bone cancer pain, suggesting that lentivirus expressed small RNA of TLR4 interfered TLR4 expression.

3.3. LvOn-siTLR4 with DOX Decreased TNF-α and IL-1β

To investigate whether the antiallodynia effects of the inducible lentivirus were associated with decreased production or release of proinflammatory cytokines, protein levels of TNF-α and IL-1β were assessed in the spinal cord. As shown in Figures 4(a) and 4(b), rats with bone cancer pain markedly induced upregulation of TNF-α and IL-1β ( versus sham group). In the LvOn-siTLR4 with Dox group, small RNA expressed by the LvOn-siTLR4 significantly inhibited the release of IL-1β and TNF-α in the spinal cord ( versus other four groups). These results indicated that TLR4 small RNA expressed by the virus LvOn-siTLR4 with DOX could disrupt the release of TNF-α and IL-1β.

4. Discussion

In this study, the effects of nociception on bone cancer pain models were investigated by inducible lentivirus expressing siRNA against TLR4. Based on our results, not only could LvOn-siTLR4 attenuate mechanical allodynia by intrathecal injection, but also its induction significantly downregulated mRNA and protein expression of TLR4 in the spinal cord. IL-1β and TNF-α release were significantly inhibited by small RNA expressed by LvOn-siTLR4 as well. In addition, the small RNA expression by LvOn-siTLR4 could be induced by oral administration of doxycycline. Our findings suggest that the lentivirus-mediated siRNA against TLR4 may be used for gene therapy of bone cancer pain in an experimental setting. If this is successful, the downregulation of TLR4 expression by inducible lentivirus LvOn-siTLR4 may be used to treat bone cancer pain in clinic.

It has been reported that the glial activation in the spinal cord is involved in bone cancer pain [19]. The activated glia and subsequent release of proinflammatory mediators have been implicated in initiating and maintaining pain response. TLR4 has shown mechanistic links between glial activation, innate immunity, and the initiation of behavioral hypersensitivity [20]. Through the activation of TLR4-MyD88-dependent or -independent pathways [21, 22], TLR4 activates intracellular signal molecules including TNF receptor-associated factor 6 and IKKα, β (IκB kinase) to form a complex and phosphorylated IκB [23]. The phosphorylation leads to the degradation of IκB and subsequent translocation of NF-κB, which controls the releasing of proinflammatory cytokines including TNF-α and IL-1β [24]. The downregulation of TLR4 by small RNA leading to decrease in the TNF-α and IL-1β was confirmed in the present study, which was consistent with the former research where blocking the TLR4 decreased the expression of TNF-α and IL-1β [15]. Activation of the TLR4 pathway in the spinal cord is proven to contribute to the neuropathic pain [7, 25, 26] and the suppression of TLR4 protein expression by siRNA could alleviate hyperalgesia and allodynia in CCI model of rats [9]. The present study showed the reduction of TLR4 and attenuation of allodynia after intrathecal injection of the lentivirus expressing small RNA. It is consistent with the former report that tactile allodynia in rats with bone cancer could be attenuated by the blocking TLR4 [6]. All these suggested that TLR4 signal pathway may involve bone cancer pain and that attenuation of TLR4 may probably be a new treatment of bone cancer pain.

In the application of RNAi technique, the efficiency, specificity, and stability of siRNA in target cells should be considered [27, 28]. Our previous work has showed the specificity and efficiency of small RNA in targeting of TLR4 [15]. However, naked siRNA mediated downregulation of gene expression is not stable and only lasts for 3 to 5 days [9]. Hence, the lentivirus, capable of expressing the target gene for several months and suitable for bone cancer pain treatment [29, 30], was introduced as a tool for siRNA. As hypothesized, results showed that the antinociception effect lasted for about 21 days, which provided a suitable tool for the treatment of bone cancer pain as a chronic state. Our previous work has shown that the lentivirus was successfully transfected into dorsal horn of rats after intrathecal injection [31], which was consistent with the location of TLR4 [32]. The results showed that LvOn-siTLR4 intrathecal injection along with oral administration of doxycycline attenuated allodynia of rats, which suggested that the lentivirus LvOn-siTLR4 could suppress nociception in the bone cancer models through decreasing the expression of TLR4.

For further clinical usage, the levels and timing of TLR4 expression need to be regulated to prevent overreduction of target gene. In the current research, tetracycline-regulated gene expression (Tet-on) system was introduced into the lentivirus. The tetracycline (tet) repressor was fused to a herpes simplex virus (HSV) VP 16 transactivation domain in this system to form a reverse tet-controlled transcriptional activator (rtTA) [33, 34]. In this case, in the presence of Dox or Tet, rtTA is able to bind operator sequences to activate transcription, turning on the target gene expression [35, 36]. Our results showed that TLR4 and its mRNA expressions were decreased after injection of the virus LvOn-siTLR4 with oral administration of Dox, while rats without Dox had no effect on TLR4 and its mRNA. The results illustrated that the expression of small RNA by LvOn-siTLR4 was under the control of Dox. In this case, the timing and levels of TLR4 could be controlled precisely by oral administration of doxycycline to maintain protein concentrations within a therapeutic window for further clinical practice.

However, TLR4 expression regulated by oral administration of doxycycline in a dose-dependent manner is needed. Further researches are warranted.

5. Conclusion

In the present study, we showed that downregulation of TLR4 by intrathecal injection of inducible lentivirus LvOn-siTLR4 could prevent bone cancer-induced tactile allodynia and that TLR4 expression could be controlled by doxycycline in regulation of the lentivirus. Our study provided a new approach of bone cancer pain treatment by downregulation of TLR4 expression using an inducible lentivirus LvOn-siTLR4.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contribution

Ruirui Pan and Huiting Di contributed equally to this work.


This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30901403).


  1. P. Strang, “Cancer pain—a provoker of emotional, social and existential distress,” Acta Oncologica, vol. 37, no. 7-8, pp. 641–644, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. T. Kinzel, “Symptom control in geriatric patients with terminal cancer: pain, nausea, and vomiting,” Geriatrics, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 83–89, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  3. P. Honore, S. D. Rogers, M. J. Schwei et al., “Murine models of inflammatory, neuropathic and cancer pain each generates a unique set of neurochemical changes in the spinal cord and sensory neurons,” Neuroscience, vol. 98, no. 3, pp. 585–598, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. M. J. Schwei, P. Honore, S. D. Rogers et al., “Neurochemical and cellular reorganization of the spinal cord in a murine model of bone cancer pain,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 19, no. 24, pp. 10886–10897, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  5. L. R. Watkins, E. D. Milligan, and S. F. Maier, “Glial activation: a driving force for pathological pain,” Trends in Neurosciences, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 450–455, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. L. S. Lan, Y. J. Ping, W. L. Na et al., “Down-regulation of Toll-like receptor 4 gene expression by short interfering RNA attenuates bone cancer pain in a rat model,” Molecular Pain, vol. 6, article 2, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. I. Bettoni, F. Comelli, C. Rossini et al., “Glial TLR4 receptor as new target to treat neuropathic pain: efficacy of a new receptor antagonist in a model of peripheral nerve injury in mice,” Glia, vol. 56, no. 12, pp. 1312–1319, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. T. Sun, J. Luo, M. Jia, H. Li, K. Li, and Z. Fu, “Small interfering RNA-mediated knockdown of NF-κBp65 attenuates neuropathic pain following peripheral nerve injury in rats,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 682, no. 1–3, pp. 79–85, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. F.-X. Wu, J.-J. Bian, X.-R. Miao et al., “Intrathecal siRNA against toll-like receptor 4 reduces nociception in a rat model of neuropathic pain,” International Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 251–259, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  10. S. C. Barry, B. Harder, M. Brzezinski, L. Y. Flint, J. Seppen, and W. R. A. Osborne, “Lentivirus vectors encoding both central polypurine tract and posttranscriptional regulatory element provide enhanced transduction and transgene expression,” Human Gene Therapy, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 1103–1108, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. D. Wübbenhorst, K. Dumler, B. Wagner et al., “Tetracycline-regulated bone morphogenetic protein 2 gene expression in lentivirally transduced primary rabbit chondrocytes for treatment of cartilage defects,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 62, no. 7, pp. 2037–2046, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. X.-R. Miao, X.-F. Gao, J.-X. Wu et al., “Bilateral downregulation of Nav1.8 in dorsal root ganglia of rats with bone cancer pain induced by inoculation with Walker 256 breast tumor cells,” BMC Cancer, vol. 10, article 216, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. R. V. Størkson, A. Kjørsvik, A. Tjølsen, and K. Hole, “Lumbar catheterization of the spinal subarachnoid space in the rat,” Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 167–172, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. E. D. Milligan, J. L. Hinde, K. K. Mehmert, S. F. Maier, and L. R. Watkins, “A method for increasing the viability of the external portion of lumbar catheters placed in the spinal subarachnoid space of rats,” Journal of Neuroscience Methods, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 81–86, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. F. Wu, Y. Liu, X. Lv, X. Miao, Y. Sun, and W. Yu, “Small interference RNA targeting TLR4 gene effectively attenuates pulmonary inflammation in a rat model,” Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology, vol. 2012, Article ID 406435, 8 pages, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. G. An, T.-N. Lin, J.-S. Liu, J.-J. Xue, Y.-Y. He, and C. Y. Hsu, “Expression of c-fos and c-jun family genes after focal cerebral ischemia,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 457–464, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. E. D. Milligan, C. Twining, M. Chacur et al., “Spinal glia and proinflammatory cytokines mediate mirror-image neuropathic pain in rats,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1026–1040, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  18. M. M. Bradford, “A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 72, no. 1-2, pp. 248–254, 1976. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. C. Lu, Y. Liu, B. Sun et al., “Intrathecal injection of JWH-015 attenuates bone cancer pain via time-dependent modification of pro-inflammatory cytokines expression and astrocytes activity in spinal cord,” Inflammation, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. E. Csullog, G. Joo, G. Toth, I. Dobos, G. Benedek, and G. Horvath, “Antinociceptive effect of continuous intrathecal administration of endomorphin-1,” Pain, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 31–38, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. I. L. Calil, A. C. Zarpelon, A. T. G. Guerrero et al., “Lipopolysaccharide induces inflammatory hyperalgesia triggering a TLR4/MyD88-dependent cytokine cascade in the mice paw,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 3, Article ID e90013, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. R.-J. Chen, H.-H. Yuan, T.-Y. Zhang et al., “Heme oxygenase-2 suppress TNF-α and IL6 expression via TLR4/MyD88-dependent signaling pathway in mouse cerebral vascular endothelial cells,” Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 971–978, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. M. Ray, S. Yu, D. R. Sharda et al., “Inhibition of TLR4-induced IκB kinase activity by the RON receptor tyrosine kinase and its ligand, macrophage-stimulating protein,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 185, no. 12, pp. 7309–7316, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. S. Lehnard, C. Lachance, S. Patrizi et al., “The toll-like receptor TLR4 is necessary for lipopolysaccharide-induced oligodendrocyte injury in the CNS,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 2478–2486, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  25. Y.-Q. Ma, Y.-R. Chen, Y.-F. Leng, and Z.-W. Wu, “Tanshinone IIA downregulates HMGB1 and TLR4 expression in a spinal nerve ligation model of neuropathic pain,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2014, Article ID 639563, 8 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. M. R. Hutchinson, Y. Zhang, K. Brown et al., “Non-stereoselective reversal of neuropathic pain by naloxone and naltrexone: involvement of toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4),” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 20–29, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. S. Gupta, R. A. Schoer, J. E. Egan, G. J. Hannon, and V. Mittal, “Inducible, reversible, and stable RNA interference in mammalian cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 7, pp. 1927–1932, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. M. Pan, J. Ni, H. He, S. Gao, and X. Duan, “New paradigms on siRNA local application,” BMB Reports, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 147–152, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. M.-C. Luo, D.-Q. Zhang, S.-W. Ma et al., “An efficient intrathecal delivery of small interfering RNA to the spinal cord and peripheral neurons,” Molecular Pain, vol. 1, article 29, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. A. Meunier and M. Pohl, “Lentiviral vectors for gene transfer into the spinal cord glial cells,” Gene Therapy, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 476–482, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. F. Wu, R. Pan, J. Chen et al., “Lentivirus mediated siRNA against GluN2B subunit of NMDA receptor reduces nociception in a rat model of neuropathic pain,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 871637, 7 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. Y.-K. Zhang, J.-T. Liu, Z.-W. Peng et al., “Different TLR4 expression and microglia/macrophage activation induced by hemorrhage in the rat spinal cord after compressive injury,” Journal of Neuroinflammation, vol. 10, article 112, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. A. Welman, J. Barraclough, and C. Dive, “Tetracycline regulated systems in functional oncogenomics,” Translational Oncogenomics, vol. 2, pp. 17–33, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  34. A. Tauch, A. Pühler, J. Kalinowski, and G. Thierbach, “TetZ, a new tetracycline resistance determinant discovered in gram-positive bacteria, shows high homology to gram-negative regulated efflux systems,” Plasmid, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 285–291, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. K. Pluta, M. J. Luce, L. Bao, S. Agha-Mohammadi, and J. Reiser, “Tight control of transgene expression by lentivirus vectors containing second-generation tetracycline-responsive promoters,” The Journal of Gene Medicine, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 803–817, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. T. Yang, C. Burrows, and J. H. Park, “Development of a doxycycline-inducible lentiviral plasmid with an instant regulatory feature,” Plasmid, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 29–35, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Ruirui Pan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.