Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2014, Article ID 292608, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/292608
Research Article

An Empirical Study of Parameter Estimation for Stated Preference Experimental Design

1School of Transportation and Logistics, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
2Jiangsu Province Collaborative Innovation Center of Modern Urban Traffic Technologies, Si Pai Lou No. 2, Nanjing 210096, China
3Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
4School of Transportation, Southeast University, No. 2 Si Pai Lou, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210096, China

Received 12 July 2014; Accepted 15 August 2014; Published 31 August 2014

Academic Editor: Huimin Niu

Copyright © 2014 Fei Yang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Z. Sándor and M. Wedel, “Designing conjoint choice experiments using managers' prior beliefs,” Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 430–444, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. V. V. Can, “Estimation of travel mode choice for domestic tourists to Nha Trang using the multinomial probit model,” Transportation Research A: Policy and Practice, vol. 49, pp. 149–159, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. Hoen and M. J. Koetse, “A choice experiment on alternative fuel vehicle preferences of private car owners in the Netherlands,” Transportation Research A, vol. 61, pp. 199–215, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  4. D. Hoyos, “The state of the art of environmental valuation with discrete choice experiments,” Ecological Economics, vol. 69, no. 8, pp. 1595–1603, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. A. Hensher, J. M. Rose, and W. H. Greene, Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2005.
  6. T. Fowkes, “The design and interpretation of freight stated preference experiments seeking to elicit behavioural valuations of journey attributes,” Transportation Research B: Methodological, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 966–980, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. M. Rose and M. C. Bliemer, “Stated preference experimental design strategies,” in Handbook of Transport Modelling, pp. 151–180, Elsevier, Oxford, UK, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  8. B. J. Kanninen, “Optimal design for multinomial choice experiments,” Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 214–227, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. C. J. Bliemer, J. M. Rose, and D. A. Hensher, “Efficient stated choice experiments for estimating nested logit models,” Transportation Research B: Methodological, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 19–35, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. C. J. Bliemer and J. M. Rose, “Experimental design influences on stated choice outputs: an empirical study in air travel choice,” Transportation Research A: Policy and Practice, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 63–79, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. J. Louviere, T. Islam, N. Wasi, D. Street, and L. Burgess, “Designing discrete choice experiments: do optimal designs come at a price?” Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 360–375, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. Tudela and G. Rebolledo, “Optimal design of stated preference experiments when using mixed logit models,” in Proceedings of the European Transport Conference (ETC' 06), Leiden, The Netherlands, 2006.
  13. D. A. Hensher and J. M. Rose, “Development of commuter and non-commuter mode choice models for the assessment of new public transport infrastructure projects: a case study,” Transportation Research A: Policy and Practice, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 428–443, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. D. A. Hensher, J. M. Rose, J. D. D. Ortúzar, and L. I. Rizzi, “Estimating the willingness to pay and value of risk reduction for car occupants in the road environment,” Transportation Research A: Policy and Practice, vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 692–707, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. C. J. Bliemer and J. M. Rose, “Construction of experimental designs for mixed logit models allowing for correlation across choice observations,” Transportation Research B: Methodological, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 720–734, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. Bliemer and J. M. Rose, “Designing stated choice experiments: state-of-the-art,” in Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Kyoto, Japan, 2006.
  17. R. Kessels, B. Jones, P. Goos, and M. Vandebroek, “Recommendations on the use of Bayesian optimal designs for choice experiments,” Quality and Reliability Engineering International, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 737–744, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus