Research Article

One-Step Dynamic Classifier Ensemble Model for Customer Value Segmentation with Missing Values

Table 3

Comparison of performance in “German” dataset with MCAR type MVs.

Missing levelEvaluation criteriaLMFODCEMKI-SVMMS-SVMEM-SVMRI-SVM

%Total accuracy0.6767 (3)0.6987 (1)0.6700 (4)0.6933 (2)0.6600 (5)0.6533 (6)
AUC0.8402 (4)0.8592 (1)0.8274 (6)0.8583 (2)0.8456 (3)0.8334 (5)
Type I accuracy0.5513 (4)0.6124 (1)0.5239 (6)0.6069 (2)0.5529 (3)0.5298 (5)
Type II accuracy0.7304 (3.5)0.7357 (2)0.7412 (1)0.7304 (3.5)0.7059 (6)0.7108 (5)
%Total accuracy0.7033 (3)0.7333 (1)0.6667 (6)0.6767 (5)0.7000 (4)0.7067 (2)
AUC0.8490 (6)0.8865 (1)0.8645 (3)0.8628 (4)0.8710 (2)0.8589 (5)
Type I accuracy0.6052 (6)0.6979 (1)0.6127 (5)0.6529 (2)0.6481 (3)0.6272 (4)
Type II accuracy0.7454 (2)0.7485 (1)0.6898 (6)0.7130 (5)0.7222 (4)0.7407 (3)
θ = 20%Total accuracy0.7533 (3.5)0.7867 (1)0.7633 (2)0.7533 (3.5)0.7500 (5)0.7433 (6)
AUC0.8764 (2.5)0.8902 (1)0.8493 (6)0.8764 (2.5)0.8643 (5)0.8692 (4)
Type I accuracy0.7138 (2.5)0.7598 (1)0.6526 (5)0.7138 (2.5)0.6712 (4)0.6384 (6)
Type II accuracy0.7703 (5.5)0.7982 (2)0.8108 (1)0.7703 (5.5)0.7838 (4)0.7883 (3)
%Total accuracy0.6867 (3.5)0.7097 (1)0.6867 (3.5)0.6667 (6)0.6700 (5)0.6933 (2)
AUC0.8472 (4)0.8625 (1)0.8286 (5)0.8491 (3)0.8180 (6)0.8524 (2)
Type I accuracy0.5946 (5)0.6375 (1)0.5941 (6)0.6016 (3)0.5956 (4)0.6054 (2)
Type II accuracy0.7396 (2.5)0.7406 (1)0.7349 (4)0.7031 (6)0.7188 (5)0.7396 (2.5)
%Total accuracy0.6733 (3)0.6867 (1)0.6740 (2)0.6533 (6)0.6600 (5)0.6633 (4)
AUC0.8172 (3)0.8596 (1)0.8484 (2)0.8083 (5)0.7908 (6)0.8125 (4)
Type I accuracy0.5832 (3)0.6101 (1)0.5639 (5)0.5997 (2)0.5736 (4)0.5498 (6)
Type II accuracy0.7071 (3)0.7240 (1.5)0.7240 (1.5)0.6719 (6)0.6919 (5)0.6971 (4)

Average rank3.63 1.13 4.00 3.83 4.40 4.03

Note: the bold-face in Table 3 shows the maximum of each row. The numbers in parentheses are the ranks of the six models with the corresponding evaluation criterion in each row.