Research Article  Open Access
A Computational Model to Assess Poststenting Wall Stresses Dependence on Plaque Structure and Stenosis Severity in Coronary Artery
Abstract
The current study presents computational models to investigate the poststenting hemodynamic stresses and internal stresses over/within the diseased walls of coronary arteries which are in different states of atherosclerotic plaque. The finite element method is applied to build the axisymmetric models which include the plaque, arterial wall, and stent struts. The study takes into account the mechanical effects of the opening pressure and its association with the plaque severity and the morphology. The wall shear stresses and the von Mises stresses within the stented coronary arteries show their strong dependence on the plaque structure, particularly the fibrous cap thickness. Higher stresses occur in severely stenosed coronaries with a thinner fibrous cap. Large stress concentrations around the stent struts cause injury or damage to the vessel wall which is linked to the mechanism of restenosis. The instent restenosis rate is also highly dependent on the opening pressure, to the extent that stenosed artery is expanded, and geometry of the stent struts. The present study demonstrates, for the first time, that the restenosis is to be viewed as a consequence of biomechanical design of a stent repeating unit, the opening pressure, and the severity and morphology of the plaque.
1. Introduction
Atherosclerosis is one of the major causes of death worldwide. The coronary artery is the most subjected artery to atherosclerosis, where plaque is accumulated within the inner walls of the vessel [1]. In case of partial or total lumen obstruction, the stent implantation is the common procedure to resume the vascular lumen with minimal surgical complication [1, 2]. However, the restenosis in the coronary artery remains a recurrent problem in 30%–40% of the cases after the patient has received a bare metal stent [3].
The mechanism of restenosis has been hypothesized to involve the injury or damage to the vessel wall due to the high stresses generated around the stent when it expands [4]. In vivo and in vitro studies have revealed that stent structure (stent configuration, its global length, the delivery system, the struts dimensions, shape, spacing, and many others) influences restenosis and thrombus formation between struts [1, 3, 5]. Several studies have investigated the stresses generated in the vascular wall as a way to compare the stents relative to their potential for restenosis [4, 6]. A study of the arterial tissue within repeating units of different commercially available stent designs has been performed by Prendergast et al. [4]. They reported tissue prolapse and arterial wall stresses; however, the stentartery contact was not simulated in that analysis. The most detailed numerical model of a cardiovascular intervention to date is the model developed by Holzapfel et al. [7]. They developed a threedimensional (3D) model using the finiteelement method to determine the stresses induced within the vessel for a balloon angioplasty and stenting procedures. However, the localized stresses around the stent struts, that is, the stresses most likely to provoke instent restenosis, were not computed. Lally et al. [6] suggested that the two different stent designs have significantly different restenosis rates and confirmed the use of computerbased finiteelement analysis as a preclinical testing methodology to analyze the biomechanical attributes of cardiovascular stents. On the other hand, the mechanical behavior of the stent and biomechanical interaction between the stent and the artery has been tied to the artery hemodynamics [8, 9]. The hemodynamics is affected by the formation of vortices and stagnation which is induced by the parts of stent struts protruding into the lumen [10, 11].
Moreover, the magnitude and distribution of stresses within an atherosclerotic artery are affected by the blood pressure, the arterial wall thickness and properties, and the severity, structure, and properties of the plaque [12]. Gao and Long [13] investigated the influence of plaque structure on the stress distribution, taking into account combinations of fibrous cap and necrotic core volume but with the same degree of stenosis. They found that the stress levels are highly dependent on plaque structure and are much more sensitive to the changes in the fibrous thickness than the necrotic core volume. Ohayon et al. [14] demonstrated that the stability of plaque cannot be viewed as a consequence of fibrous cap alone but rather as a combination of cap thickness, necrotic core, and arterial remodeling index. Pericevic et al. [15] studied the influence of plaque structure and inflation pressure on wall stress during stent expansion. They studied the influence of plaque stiffness and stent deployment pressures, while the importance of stenosis severity in their study was ignored and the plaque was modeled as one layer. Numerous computational studies have combined the mechanical behavior of stents with the hemodynamic inside the arteries to correlate the stent design with the restenosis rates that may help to develop novel stent designs [1, 2, 6, 11, 16, 17]. However, in these studies, the arterial wall and the plaque have been modeled as single layers, and the impact of stenosis severity and the multilayer wall and plaque composition in the reoccurrence of stenosis have been ignored.
In the present study, an attempt is made to implement a simple computational model for studying the effects of plaque severity and structure on surface and internal stresses of arterial wall in stented coronaries. Numerical simulations are carried out in small segments of locally straight human coronary artery consisting of multilayer plaque and arterial wall around a single stent strut. The wall stresses are calculated in different degrees of stenosis severity. Various pressures are applied to open the stenosed coronaries of different severities to the diameter of the healthy lumen. Besides, a fixed value of pressure is applied to open stenosed coronaries to see how stenosis rate affects the ability of artery to be opened.
2. Materials and Methods
Several axisymmetric models of stentplaqueartery are generated to represent the stented coronary arteries at different stages of atherosclerotic lesion growth. Stress distribution is studied inside the plaque and arterial wall, as well as the shear stress over the luminal surface of stented artery. The models are generated and solved using the finiteelement based package of COMSOL Multiphysics 3.5a.
2.1. Model Geometry
The stented human coronary artery is created in an axisymmetric geometry containing a ringlike stent [9] placed in a cylindrical unit of stenosed artery with the length of 1.25 mm [18], an internal diameter of 3.0 mm, and a thickness of 0.4 mm [11], as shown in Figure 1(b). A 3D schematic view of the artery by the ringlike stent is demonstrated in Figure 1(a), where various layers of plaque and the outer media layer are also shown. An axisymmetric plane AX is applied to cut the artery because of the axisymmetric shape which is shown in Figure 1(b). The plaque is a multilayer medium with the thicknesses of 0.34 mm, 0.55 mm, and 0.83 mm in the stenoses of 40%, 60%, and 80%, respectively. The plaque has three layers as fibrous cap, soft necrotic core, and fibrosis. It has been shown that the area fraction of necrotic core with respect to the total area of the plaque naturally increases with the stenosis degree [19]. Virmani et al. [20] measured the area fraction of necrotic core in different stages of plaque growth in human coronaries. Those data have been applied in the present study. Table 1 represents the area fraction of the necrotic core for 40%, 60%, and 80% stenosed coronaries. Three different thicknesses of fibrous cap have been taken into account, namely, thin, medium, and thick (values given in Table 1). This will signify the role of fibrous cap thickness in the blood flow dynamics around the stent strut. The ringlike stent described above has a rectangular cross section with the thickness of 0.1 mm [1] and the width of 0.15 mm [11].

(a)
(b)
(c)
The stent struts are assumed to be repeated periodically, where only one periodic unit is considered in the model [9]. This assumption is made to save computational time because no significant difference is observed in the wall shear stress distribution when multiple struts are present in the model as it will be shown in the results. The stent strut is kept fixed while the plaque and arterial wall are constrained in the axial direction with permission to deform in radial direction. This condition prevents the tangential deformation of the stenosed artery [21] with no slip allowed between the strut and plaque contact face. The expansion of the stenosed arteries is performed as explained below.
The stent strut is not initially positioned in place. Internal pressure is increased to let the coronaries with 40%, 60%, and 80% stenoses reach the healthy lumen diameter of 2.68 mm. Table 2 shows the pressure values applied to the stenosed coronaries of the abovementioned stenosis percentages. In the following step, the stent strut is located in place. The insertion of stent naturally boosts the internal stresses as well as external compression imposed by adjacent tissue [22]. In this context, various factors are involved including the geometry and mechanical properties of stent and arterial wall and neighboring tissue, wall deformation, and blood pressure. In the present study, an external pressure will be created over the outer surface of the artery due to the opening of stent. The internal lumen pressure is decreased to the mean blood pressure of 100 mmHg. The value of the external pressure is expressed relative to the internal lumen pressure of 100 mmHg so that the net pressure difference applied to the outer surface of the stenosed artery remains 15 mmHg [22, 23]. This value has been assumed in all stenoses cases to eliminate the effect of its variation from the results. The plaque and arterial wall are allowed to deform under this value of external pressure, noting that the stent strut is kept fixed in the luminal side.

In addition to the abovementioned cases, where different pressure values are applied for various stenoses to reach the healthy artery diameter, a benchmark case is created for each stenosis in which a constant internal pressure of 100 mmHg is applied for the initial expansion of the artery. The diameter of the artery expands, under pressure of 100 mmHg, to 3.20 mm, 3.10 mm, and 3.04 mm corresponding to the stenoses of 40%, 60%, and 80%. The rest of simulation procedure has been as explained for previous cases. Table 2 compares the values of lumen diameter and fibrous cap thickness under expansion with the fixed pressure of 100 mmHg to those corresponding to the expansion with variable pressures.
2.2. Material Properties
The arterial wall is modeled as a viscoelastic layer that can be simulated by the generalized Maxwell model also found in COMSOL Multiphysics 3.5a [7, 24]. The shear modulus for the arterial wall is taken as kPa based on the data from Baldewsing et al. [25]. The arterial wall is assumed to be incompressible (i.e., Poisson’s ) [2, 6]. Thus, the bulk modulus of the wall, , tends to infinity, taken as 10^{20} Pa, in the present study. The three layers of the plaque are also assumed to be incompressible and represented by the generalized Maxwell model. The shear modulus of fibrous cap and fibrosis layers are taken as 200 kPa, whereas the soft necrotic core has the shear modulus of kPa [26]. The density of arterial wall and plaque is considered as kg·m^{−3} [27]. The deformations of arterial wall and plaque layers take place statically.
2.3. Computational Method
The blood is modeled as a Newtonian and incompressible fluid with a density of 1060 kg·m^{−3} and a dynamic viscosity of 0.0035 Pa·s [9, 11]. Parabolic velocity profiles are applied, at the inlet, for steady and transient conditions, as where is the radius at the inlet and is the maximum velocity at the inlet for steady conditions as 0.35 m/s [28]. For transient simulations ( in (1) is substituted by of (2)), a set of polynomials representing the time dependent inlet velocity for one cardiac cycle is used, given by (2) [29], where the constants are given in Table 3. Transient simulations are performed for three cardiac cycles, while each cardiac period is 0.735 s (Figure 5(a)). Since there was no significance difference between the last and second last cycles, the results of the last cycle will be presented in the following sections. At the outlet, a pressure with the value of 100 mmHg is specified. The deformed structure only served as a boundary, where the flow simulations are carried out numerically by solving NavierStokes equations using the finiteelement method, described by where is density, is dynamic viscosity of blood, is velocity vector, and is pressure. For steady simulations, the term equals zero. Convergence criterion for the continuity and momentum residuals was kept at 10^{−6}.

3. Results and Discussion
The computational results for the von Mises stress and wall shear stress were determined to be independent of mesh density. Computational mesh was employed for each layer consisting of 4283, 3467, 2150, 2170, and 2502 triangular elements in lumen, fibrosis cap, necrotic core, fibrosis, and arterial wall, respectively. Finer meshes were prescribed in the regions of interest near the strut and the walls of plaque and artery. Since the maximum value of von Mises stress in fibrous cap was sensitive to mesh changes, the mesh was additionally refined around the stent corners where stress concentration is very high. The model was solved using a generalized linear solver, namely, the UMFPACK solver. Simulations were performed on a Dell PRECISION T3600, 12 processor computers with 64 GB RAM. During the solution process for the entire domain of the lumen and stenosed arterial wall, there were approximately 90,000 degrees of freedom. Postprocessing results for the von Mises stress, wall shear stress, and flow profiles were obtained using postprocessing features of Comsol Multiphysics 3.5a package.
Following gridindependence analysis, the results of wall shear stress and von Mises stress are presented and discussed for the axisymmetric models of stentplaqueartery, in which atherosclerotic plaque size and morphology are taken into account. Figure 2(a) shows the wall shear stress distribution on the stenosed arterial wall after insertion of the stent with multiple struts. A periodic distribution of wall shear stress is observed for 40%, 60%, and 80% stenosed coronary arteries. However, the wall shear stress vary by 0.3 Pa from inlet to the first strut and 0.1 Pa from last strut to the exit of single and multiple strut models. In order to provide more evidence of periodicity, the velocity profiles are demonstrated at different locations along multiple struts in Figure 2(b). It clearly displays the periodic feature of the flow in the lumen in the units corresponding to consecutive struts. Moreover, the distribution of von Mises stress along the interfaces of various layers is plotted in Figures 2(c)–2(e) corresponding to the interfaces of fibrous capnecrotic core, necrotic corefibrosis, and fibrosisarterial wall, respectively. These figures indicate clearly the periodicity of stress in various units of struts. Therefore, the assumption of single strut is justified in the rest of the results presented here.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
Figure 3 demonstrates the distribution of the wall shear stress on the stented arterial wall surface in various strut thicknesses which have been employed by Balossino et al. [1] and Jiménez and Davies [9]. Thinner struts increase wall shear stress magnitude, as shown in Figures 3(a), 3(b), and 3(c). The length of recirculation zone in both sides of the strut reduces with decreasing the strut thickness for all percentages of stenosis. The results are in good agreement with the data reported by Jiménez and Davies [9].
(a)
(b)
(c)
3.1. Wall Shear Stress Distribution
The stenosed coronary arteries with 40%, 60%, and 80% stenoses are pressurized to reach the lumen diameter of 2.68 mm which corresponds to the healthy lumen. Prior to the pressurization of the model artery, the blood flow simulation was performed within the stenosed arteries with 40%, 60%, and 80% stenoses, which resulted in the values of wall shear stress as 2.1 Pa, 2.6 Pa, and 3.6 Pa, respectively. This was obtained using the parabolic inlet velocity profile as described before, while the diameters of stenosed arteries were different.
Flow simulations were performed after the insertion of stent strut (described in Section 2). Figure 4(a) shows the distribution of wall shear stress along the axial direction of the stented coronary artery in different stenoses. Note that Figure 4(a) corresponds to the stenosis with the medium fibrous cap thickness of 0.187 mm (given in Table 1). In Figure 4(a), the straight line from to mm represents the location of the strut. Figure 4(a) reveals that the wall shear stress decreases from its maximum at the inlet (the middle of two consecutive struts) to values below 0.5 Pa in the upstream vicinity of the strut. In the downstream vicinity of the strut, the value of wall shear stress is below 0.5 Pa and it rises along the deformed zone to a plateau at 1.25 Pa. Figures 2–4 indicate that a strut imposes lower wall shear stress in its vicinity. The current model is a simple representation of single unit of the entire stent. Despite differences observed for the shape of the luminal surface between stented arteries with 40% and 80% stenoses, as seen in Figures 4(b) and 4(c), only a small discrepancy is observed for the distribution of wall shear stress for the whole stenosis percentages (Figure 4(a)).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
In order to compare the behavior of shear stress between the steady flow and the transient flow, the time dependent flow simulations are also performed. Figures 5(b) to 5(d) represent the histograms for the percentage of luminal surface area with the wall shear stress less than 0.5 Pa ( Pa), in five specified time instants of the cardiac cycle shown in Figure 5(a). The threshold of 0.5 Pa indicates a critical wall shear stress value to consider a region prone to restenosis [1, 16, 27]. Figures 5(b), 5(c), and 5(d) display the area percentages with wall shear stress values below 0.5 Pa for different plaques with thin, medium, and thick fibrous caps. Results reveal that the areas corresponding to wall shear stress below the critical value of 0.5 Pa, unlike the steady state flow, are dependent of the instants taken on the cardiac pulse shown in Figure 5(a). The value of wall shear stress increases with the inlet velocity, and simultaneously the luminal surface area below the critical wall shear stress declines. Figures 5(b), 5(c), and 5(d) show that Pa decreases at the systole (0.141 s) in all stenosed arteries. During the accelerating phase (e.g., 0.081 s), Pa varies significantly with the fibrous cap thickness. It is maximized when the blood velocity reaches a minimum. These results are in agreement with the results reported by Balossino et al. [1]. Figure 5 also demonstrates that Pa is higher for 40% stenosis than the other stenosis percentages, particularly in thinner fibrous cap. This may be explained by comparing the data of fibrous cap thickness given in Tables 1 and 2 for different degrees of stenoses before and after stenting. Although 80% stenosis obtains a thinner fibrous cap after stenting, the whole plaque remains thicker in this case. Hence, in addition to fibrous cap thickness, the thickness of necrotic core and fibrosis are critical in assessing the risk of restenosis.
3.2. von Mises Stress Distribution
Figures 6(a), 6(b), 6(c), and 6(d) demonstrate the maximum von Mises stress for 40%, 60%, and 80% stenosed coronary arteries through the fibrous cap, necrotic core, fibrosis, and arterial wall layers, respectively. Note that the distribution of von Mises stress is also shown for corresponding parts in Figure 6 by colored contours for only 60% stenosis with the medium thickness of fibrous cap (Table 1).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Figure 6 reveals that the von Mises stress is significantly elevated within the fibrous cap and fibrosis layers by the stent insertion, while it is less affected within the necrotic core and arterial wall layers. Figure 6 also displays the effect of the fibrous cap thickness on von Mises stress. Among all plaque layers and arterial wall, the maximum values of von Mises stress are observed in the thin fibrous cap. Higher stresses are predicted in layers of thinner fibrous cap, while the thicker fibrous cap appears to play a protective role by reducing the levels of stress within the next plaque layers and arterial tissue for a given inflation pressure [15]. Another interesting result observed in Figure 6 is the effect of the stenosis severity on the maximum von Mises stress through different layers. The maximum von Mises stress is observed within the fibrous cap in 80% stenosis that is significantly larger than those in 40% and 60% stenoses. Similar values have been calculated for 40% and 60% stenoses except at the thin fibrous cap that shows a lower value for 40% stenosis. These results are in good agreement with the results reported by Gu et al. [21]. It should be mentioned that the maximum von Mises stress is observed in the fibrous cap layer in the vicinity of its contact to the strut corners. The presented values in Figure 6(a) are averaged within a neighborhood around the two struts corners of the radius of 20 μm, where the stress concentration occurs.
The maximum von Mises stress in the fibrous cap layer is one order of magnitude higher than that in other layers. The arterial wall displays the lowest values of von Mises stress. Also, these results reveal that in all layers excluding the fibrous cap layer, the maximum von Mises stress is higher in 40% stenosis than those in 60% and 80% stenoses. This can be associated with the effect of the thickness of different plaque layers in 40% stenosis that does not allow stress to be more uniformly distributed. Hence, locally elevated stresses are more likely except in the neighborhood of strut corners in fibrous cap thickness where the larger deformation in 80% stenosis imposes bigger stress concentration.
In addition to the opening of stenosed arteries by variable pressures mentioned in Table 2, simulations with the fixed opening pressure of 100 mmHg are also performed. The main purpose of these simulations was to show how the stented coronary arteries display wall shear stress distribution differently due to discrepancies associated with the poststenting shape of the luminal surface and the lumen diameter. Figure 7(a) shows the wall shear stress distribution generated along the direction of the stented arteries with 40%, 60%, and 80% stenoses. The fibrous cap has the medium thickness in Figure 7(a). Also, the straight line from mm to mm represents the stent strut. Qualitatively, this graph is similar to the one shown in Figure 4(a). However, Figure 7(a) reveals the significant effect of the stenosis severity on wall shear stress distribution when the fixed opening pressure of 100 mmHg is applied to open the artery. The wall shear stress magnitude also differs considerably between the two sides of the strut in 80% stenosis, which creates asymmetric hemodynamic conditions around the strut. It is due to large recirculation zone created behind the strut due to small deformation of the wall. Figures 7(b) and 7(c) show the shape of stented arteries, the streamlines, and the displacement and thickness of plaque and wall layers around one strut, for 40% and 80% stenoses, respectively.
(a)
(b)
(c)
4. Conclusions
An axisymmetric model was employed to assess the hemodynamic and mechanical features in poststenting state of various stenosed coronary arteries. The risk level for injuries to the arterial wall due to stent replacement depends on many factors such as the stent design parameters, the opening pressure, the mechanical properties of the artery and plaque, and the geometry of the artery. The present study has focused on the influence of plaque severity and morphology on the hemodynamic stresses as well as the internal stresses created in the stented coronary artery. The computational model of stenosed coronary artery is composed of arterial wall (media layer) and a multilayer atherosclerotic plaque that can represent various stages of stenosis by the percentage of stenosis. The opening pressure is calculated for various stenoses to gain the diameter of healthy artery. Our simulations reveal that the wall shear stress distribution is independent of the stenoses rate if the healthy luminal diameter is reached after stenting. However, if the artery is not opened fully to its healthy diameter, the distribution of wall shear stress will depend on the stenoses rate and to the extent that the stenosed artery is expanded. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to take such an approach.
The plaque morphology, specifically the thickness of fibrous cap, has a significant influence on the stresses developed after stenting within the plaque layers and arterial wall. The thick fibrous cap layer protects the consequent layers by reduction of von Mises stress within the necrotic core, fibrosis, and arterial wall regardless of the stenosis size. However, the von Mises stress inside fibrous cap is highly dependent on the stenosis severity. Higher von Mises stress is observed in the fibrous cap layer corresponding to 80% stenosis. This suggests that higher pressures applied to 80% stenosis can induce a higher risk of vascular injury. The thinnest fibrous cap, in this study, is 27 μm that belongs to the 80% stenosis.
The plaque morphology also affects the instent restenosis process, suggested by Pericevic et al. [15]. The fibrous cap thickness affects the wall shear stress in the region prone to restenosis. The time dependent flow simulation reveals that the value of wall shear stress increases with velocity, and simultaneously the luminal surface area below the critical wall shear stress declines. It reaches the maximum when the blood velocity is at the minimum. The lumen area with wall shear stress magnitude below 0.5 Pa is higher in the thinner fibrous caps of 40% stenosis, particularly at diastole. However, the prone area to restenosis is independent of stenosis severity as the fibrous cap thickens. For 80% stenosis, the lumen area with wall shear stress below 0.5 Pa is larger for thicker fibrous cap. The direct influence of the necrotic core volume is not discussed in the results. However, the growing necrotic core volume with the stenosis rate is considered.
The stent opening pressure affects the wall shear stress magnitude in poststenting state. Transient flow simulations reveal that the wall shear stress distribution significantly varies through different instants in cardiac cycle when high pressures applied. This study reveals that the risk of restenosis around the stent struts, where the wall shear stress is lowered, could remain similar in various rates of stenosis due to similar values of wall shear stress. However, the stress concentration near the contact point of strut and the fibrous cap of the plaque rises notably in larger stenosis rates.
The thickness of stent struts influences significantly the rate of restenosis, independent of plaque severity. On the other hand, the interstrut distance affects the von Mises stress on plaque and arterial wall layers. Our results (not shown) reveal that the smaller interstrut distance enhances the prone region to restenosis particularly on downstream side of the strut. The present study is limited to the simplified and axisymmetric assumptions of plaque and artery. However, it simply describes the role of plaque structure, the thickness of stent struts, the severity of stenosis, and the flow conditions on the risk of restenosis and the level of von Mises stress created in poststenting stage. Future works will be devoted to study realistic stent models and linking them to the findings of the current model. Nevertheless, this type of simulation model provides useful and quick answers to improvements associated with the design of stents under various conditions of stenosis possibly identified in different patients.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the supporting project by the Academy of Finland under Grant no. 123938. The first author also acknowledges the funding provided by the Finnish Graduate School in Computational Fluid Dynamics.
References
 R. Balossino, F. Gervaso, F. Migliavacca, and G. Dubini, “Effects of different stent designs on local hemodynamics in stented arteries,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1053–1061, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Migliavacca, F. Gervaso, M. Prosi et al., “Expansion and drug elution model of a coronary stent,” Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 63–73, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Rogers and E. R. Edelman, “Endovascular stent design dictates experimental restenosis and thrombosis,” Circulation, vol. 91, no. 12, pp. 2995–3001, 1995. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 P. J. Prendergast, C. Lally, S. Daly et al., “Analysis of prolapse in cardiovascular stents: a constitutive equation for vascular tissue and finiteelement modelling,” Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, Transactions of the ASME, vol. 125, no. 5, pp. 692–699, 2003. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Tominaga, H. E. Kambic, H. Emoto, H. Harasaki, C. Sutton, and J. Hollman, “Effects of design geometry of intravascular endoprostheses on stenosis rate in normal rabbits,” American Heart Journal, vol. 123, no. 1, pp. 21–28, 1992. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Lally, F. Dolan, and P. J. Prendergast, “Cardiovascular stent design and vessel stresses: a finite element analysis,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 1574–1581, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. A. Holzapfel, T. C. Gasser, and M. Stadler, “A structural model for the viscoelastic behavior of arterial walls: continuum formulation and finite element analysis,” European Journal of Mechanics, A/Solids, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 441–463, 2002. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. E. Moore Jr., C. Xu, S. Glagov, C. K. Zarins, and D. N. Ku, “Fluid wall shear stress measurements in a model of the human abdominal aorta: oscillatory behavior and relationship to atherosclerosis,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 225–240, 1994. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. M. Jiménez and P. F. Davies, “Hemodynamically driven stent strut design,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 1483–1494, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. F. LaDisa Jr., D. A. Hettrick, L. E. Olson et al., “Stent implantation alters coronary artery hemodynamics and wall shear stress during maximal vasodilation,” Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 93, no. 6, pp. 1939–1946, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
 J. Mejia, B. Ruzzeh, R. Mongrain, R. Leask, and O. F. Bertrand, “Evaluation of the effect of stent strut profile on shear stress distribution using statistical moments,” BioMedical Engineering Online, vol. 8, article 8, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. Tang, C. Yang, J. Zheng et al., “Quantifying effects of plaque structure and material properties on stress distributions in human atherosclerotic plaques using 3D FSI models,” Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, vol. 127, no. 7, pp. 1185–1194, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Gao and Q. Long, “Effects of varied lipid core volume and fibrous cap thickness on stress distribution in carotid arterial plaques,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 41, no. 14, pp. 3053–3059, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Ohayon, G. Finet, A. M. Gharib et al., “Necrotic core thickness and positive arterial remodeling index: emergent biomechanical factors for evaluating the risk of plaque rupture,” The American Journal of Physiology—Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 295, no. 2, pp. H717–H727, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 I. Pericevic, C. Lally, D. Toner, and D. J. Kelly, “The influence of plaque composition on underlying arterial wall stress during stent expansion: the case for lesionspecific stents,” Medical Engineering and Physics, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 428–433, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Gay and L. T. Zhang, “Numerical studies on fluidstructure interactions of stent deployment and stented arteries,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 61–72, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar  MathSciNet
 H. Zahedmanesh and C. Lally, “Determination of the influence of stent strut thickness using the finite element method: implications for vascular injury and instent restenosis,” Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 385–393, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. N. D. Chua, B. J. MacDonald, and M. S. J. Hashmi, “Effects of varying slotted tube (stent) geometry on its expansion behaviour using finite element method,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 155156, no. 1–3, pp. 1764–1771, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. C. Stary, A. B. Chandler, R. E. Dinsmore et al., “A definition of advanced types of atherosclerotic lesions and a histological classification of atherosclerosis,” Circulation, vol. 92, no. 5, pp. 1355–1374, 1995. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Virmani, A. P. Burke, A. Farb, and F. D. Kolodgie, “Pathology of the vulnerable plaque,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. C13–C18, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Gu, S. Zhao, A. K. Muttyam, and J. M. Hammel, “The relation between the arterial stress and restenosis rate after coronary stenting,” Journal of Medical Devices, Transactions of the ASME, vol. 4, no. 3, Article ID 031005, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Tambaca, S. Canic, M. Kosor, R. D. Fish, and D. Paniagua, “Mechanical behavior of fully expanded commercially available endovascular coronary stents,” Texas Heart Institute Journal, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 491–501, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
 S. Čanić, C. J. Hartley, D. Rosenstrauch, J. Tambača, G. Guidoboni, and A. Mikelić, “Blood flow in compliant arteries: an effective viscoelastic reduced model, numerics, and experimental validation,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 575–592, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Balocco, O. Basset, G. Courbebaisse et al., “Estimation of the viscoelastic properties of vessel walls using a computational model and Doppler ultrasound,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 3557–3575, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. A. Baldewsing, C. L. de Korte, J. A. Schaar, F. Mastik, and A. F. W. van der Steen, “A finite element model for performing intravascular ultrasound elastography of human atherosclerotic coronary arteries,” Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 803–813, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Le Floc'h, G. Cloutier, G. Finet, P. Tracqui, R. I. Pettigrew, and J. Ohayon, “On the potential of a new IVUS elasticity modulus imaging approach for detecting vulnerable atherosclerotic coronary plaques: in vitro vessel phantom study,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 55, no. 19, pp. 5701–5721, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. J. Kim, I. E. VignonClementel, J. S. Coogan, C. A. Figueroa, K. E. Jansen, and C. A. Taylor, “Patientspecific modeling of blood flow and pressure in human coronary arteries,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 3195–3209, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 A. Brandts, S. D. Roes, J. Doornbos et al., “Right coronary artery flow velocity and volume assessment with spiral Kspace sampled breathhold velocityencoded MRI at 3 Tesla: accuracy and reproducibility,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1215–1223, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Jung, R. W. Lyczkowski, C. B. Panchal, and A. Hassanein, “Multiphase hemodynamic simulation of pulsatile flow in a coronary artery,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 2064–2073, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Zuned Hajiali et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.