Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Volume 2015, Article ID 958206, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/958206
Research Article

Application of the Empirical Bayes Method with the Finite Mixture Model for Identifying Accident-Prone Spots

1Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China
2Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Box 352700, Seattle, WA 98195-2700, USA
3Zachry Department of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M University, 3136 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-3136, USA
4Institute of Oceanology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China

Received 18 January 2015; Accepted 2 April 2015

Academic Editor: Paolo Maria Mariano

Copyright © 2015 Yajie Zou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Y. Zou, Y. Zhang, and D. Lord, “Analyzing different functional forms of the varying weight parameter for finite mixture of negative binomial regression models,” Analytic Methods in Accident Research, vol. 1, pp. 39–52, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. B.-J. Park and D. Lord, “Application of finite mixture models for vehicle crash data analysis,” Accident Analysis& Prevention, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 683–691, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. I. Chang and S. W. Kim, “Modelling for identifying accident-prone spots: bayesian approach with a poisson mixture model,” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 441–449, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. B.-J. Park, D. Lord, and C. Lee, “Finite mixture modeling for vehicle crash data with application to hotspot identification,” Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 71, pp. 319–326, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  5. M. A. Mohammadi, V. A. Samaranayake, and G. H. Bham, “Crash frequency modeling using negative binomial models: an application of generalized estimating equation to longitudinal data,” Analytic Methods in Accident Research, vol. 2, pp. 52–69, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. J. Lu, A. Gan, K. Haleem, and W. Wu, “Clustering-based roadway segment division for the identification of high-crash locations,” Journal of Transportation Safety & Security, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 224–239, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. R. Bandyopadhyaya and S. Mitra, “Fuzzy cluster based method of hotspot detection with limited information,” Journal of Transportation Safety Security, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 307–323, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. J. de Oña, G. López, R. Mujalli, and F. J. Calvo, “Analysis of traffic accidents on rural highways using Latent Class Clustering and Bayesian Networks,” Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 51, pp. 1–10, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. W. Cheng and S. Washington, “New criteria for evaluating methods of identifying hot spots,” Transportation Research Record, vol. 2083, pp. 76–85, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. A. Deacon, C. V. Zegeer, and R. C. Deen, “Identification of hazardous rural highway locations,” Transportation Research Record, vol. 543, pp. 16–33, 1975. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. E. Hauer, “Identification of sites with promise,” Transportation Research Record, vol. 1542, pp. 54–60, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. B. Persaud, C. Lyon, and T. Nguyen, “Empirical bayes procedure for ranking sites for safety investigation by potential for safety improvement,” Transportation Research Record, vol. 1665, no. 1, pp. 7–12, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. C. Abbess, D. Jarrett, and C. C. Wright, “Accidents at blackspots: estimating the effectiveness of remedial treatment, with special reference to the ‘regression-to-mean’ effect,” Traffic Engineering & Control, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 535–542, 1981. View at Google Scholar
  14. X. Cao, Z. Xu, and A. Y. Huang, “Safety benefits of converting HOV lanes to HOT lanes: case study of the I-394 MnPASS,” ITE Journal, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 32–37, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. L. Mountain, B. Fawaz, and D. Jarrett, “Accident prediction models for roads with minor junctions,” Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 695–707, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. Y. Zou, L. Wu, and D. Lord, “Modeling over-dispersed crash data with a long tail: examining the accuracy of the dispersion parameter in negative binomial models,” Analytic Methods in Accident Research, vol. 5-6, pp. 1–16, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  17. E. Hauer, D. W. Harwood, F. M. Council, and M. S. Griffith, “Estimating safety by the empirical bayes method: a tutorial,” Transportation Research Record, no. 1784, pp. 126–131, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. F. L. Mannering and C. R. Bhat, “Analytic methods in accident research: methodological frontier and future directions,” Analytic Methods in Accident Research, vol. 1, pp. 1–22, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. M. Hilbe, Negative Binomial Regression, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2nd edition, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  20. B.-J. Park, D. Lord, and J. D. Hart, “Bias properties of Bayesian statistics in finite mixture of negative binomial regression models in crash data analysis,” Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 741–749, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. N. Eluru, M. Bagheri, L. F. Miranda-Moreno, and L. Fu, “A latent class modeling approach for identifying vehicle driver injury severity factors at highway-railway crossings,” Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 47, pp. 119–127, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. B. Rigby and M. Stasinopoulos, A Flexible Regression Approach Using Gamlss in R, 2013, http://www.gamlss.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Lancaster-booklet.pdf.
  23. W. Cheng and S. P. Washington, “Experimental evaluation of hotspot identification methods,” Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 870–881, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. A. Montella, “A comparative analysis of hotspot identification methods,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 571–581, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. L. Wu, Y. Zou, and D. Lord, “Comparison of sichel and negative binomial models in hot spot identification,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, no. 2460, pp. 107–116, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  26. Y. Zou, Y. Zhang, and D. Lord, “Application of finite mixture of negative binomial regression models with varying weight parameters for vehicle crash data analysis,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 50, pp. 1042–1051, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. D. Lord, “Modeling motor vehicle crashes using Poisson-gamma models: examining the effects of low sample mean values and small sample size on the estimation of the fixed dispersion parameter,” Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 751–766, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus