Mathematical Problems in Engineering

Volume 2016, Article ID 1327235, 16 pages

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1327235

## Model Building and Optimization Analysis of MDF Continuous Hot-Pressing Process by Neural Network

^{1}School of Information and Computer Engineering, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China^{2}College of Electromechanical Engineering, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, China

Received 8 March 2016; Accepted 9 August 2016

Academic Editor: Yakov Strelniker

Copyright © 2016 Qingfa Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### Abstract

We propose a one-layer neural network for solving a class of constrained optimization problems, which is brought forward from the MDF continuous hot-pressing process. The objective function of the optimization problem is the sum of a nonsmooth convex function and a smooth nonconvex pseudoconvex function, and the feasible set consists of two parts, one is a closed convex subset of , and the other is defined by a class of smooth convex functions. By the theories of smoothing techniques, projection, penalty function, and regularization term, the proposed network is modeled by a differential equation, which can be implemented easily. Without any other condition, we prove the global existence of the solutions of the proposed neural network with any initial point in the closed convex subset. We show that any accumulation point of the solutions of the proposed neural network is not only a feasible point, but also an optimal solution of the considered optimization problem though the objective function is not convex. Numerical experiments on the MDF hot-pressing process including the model building and parameter optimization are tested based on the real data set, which indicate the good performance of the proposed neural network in applications.

#### 1. Introduction

Medium density fibreboard (MDF) finds many applications in wood industries because of its favorable properties such as surface characteristics, dimensional stability, and excellent machinability [1, 2]. In the MDF hot-pressing process many physical processes are involved and the complexity of this operation arises from the fact that they are coupled. Hot-pressing process is one of the key procedures in the production of MDF, which influences the utilization ratio of energy and resource. With the decreased resource of timber and the increased demand of MDF, it is of great important to analyze the experimental data effectively and reasonably, find the main factors among the many indexes of MDF, and establish the relation models on the properties of slab, the parameters in the hot-pressing process, and the main indexes of MDF. These relation models not only can help the staff give reasonable prediction and a reliability assessment to the hot-pressing process according to the actual process parameters, but also provide a theoretical basis for the setting and adjusting of the main factors in hot-pressing process according to the actual demand of MDF properties. So optimization models and methods have been important tools for the optimization, control, and scheduling of the hot-pressing of plates.

Real-time online solutions of optimization problems are desired in many engineering and scientific applications. One possible and very promising approach to solve the real-time optimization problems is to apply artificial neural networks [3–5]. With the resemblance brains, neural networks can be implemented online by hardware and have become an important technical toll for solving optimization problems, for example, [3, 4, 6–9]. Based on the gradient method, the Hopfield neural networks proposed in [4, 5] are the two classical recurrent neural networks for linear and nonlinear programming, whereafter, in addition to the gradient method, many types of neural networks are designed, such as the Lagrangian neural networks [10], the projection-type neural networks [11, 12], the dual network [13], and the stochastic neural network [14]. Projection method is an effective and simple method for solving the constraints. However, it is impossible to solve the general constraints by projection method. Then, Lagrangian and penalty methods are introduced into networks. Based on the Lagrangian function method, Lagrangian networks were proposed for solving the optimization problems [8, 10] with general constraints. But the Lagrangian network increases the dimension of the networks along with the number of the constraints. In recent years, recurrent neural networks based on penalty method were widely investigated for solving optimization problems. The neural networks for smooth optimization problems can not solve nonsmooth optimization problems, because the gradients of the objective and constrained functions are required in such neural networks. The generalized nonlinear programming circuit (G-NPC) in [15] can be considered as a natural extension of nonlinear programming circuit (NPC) for solving nonsmooth convex optimization problems with inequality constraints. But the nonempty interior of feasible region and large enough penalty parameters are needed for the network in [15]. In order to overcome the nonempty assumption of the interior of feasible region, Bian and Xue [6] proposed a recurrent neural network for nonsmooth convex optimization based on penalty function method. The efficiency of the neural networks for solving convex optimization problems relies on the convexity of functions. A neural network for nonconvex quadratic optimization is presented in [16]. Some neural networks modeled by differential inclusion were also proposed for some nonsmooth and nonconvex optimization problems [6, 17]. To overcome the differential inclusion, smoothing techniques are introduced into the neural networks. The main feature of smoothing method is to approximate the nonsmooth functions by a class of smooth functions. Thus, the neural network constructed by the smoothing techniques is modeled by a differential equation, which can be implemented easily in circuits and mathematical software [18].

In this paper, we propose a neural network model for solving the optimization problem brought forward from the MDF continuous hot-pressing automatic control system. In Section 2, some notations and necessary preliminary results are listed. In Section 3, based on the SVM theory with the existing linear and nonlinear kernel functions, we give an optimization problem, which includes the problems for building the models of MDF continuous hot-pressing system and optimizing the MDF performance indexes as special cases. In order to build up the relation models on the properties of the slab, technical parameters in hot-pressing process, and the performance indexes of MDF, when the kernel function is positive definite or semipositive definite, the corresponding optimization problem is a constrained convex problem; otherwise it is a nonconvex problem. The optimization problem for optimizing the performance parameters is a nonconvex constrained optimization problem, but its objective function is pseudoconvex due to the appropriate choice of kernel functions. In Section 4, we propose a neural network based on the penalty function method, projection method, and smoothing techniques. The proposed network is modeled by a nonautomatic differential equation. By Lyapunov method, we prove that the solution of the proposed network is global existent and convergent to the feasible set of the considered optimization problems. Moreover, due to the pseudoconvexity of the objective function and the convexity of the constraint, the proposed network also converges to the optimal solution set of the optimization problem. In Section 5, based on the existing data set, we use the proposed network into the model building and parameter optimizing problems of hot-pressing system, which validates the good performance of the obtained results in this paper.

*Notations. *. Given column vectors and , is the scalar product of and . denotes the th element of . denotes the Euclidean 2-norm defined by . For a closed convex subset , is the distance from to defined by .

#### 2. Preliminaries

In this section, we state some definitions and properties needed in this paper. We refer the readers to [19–21].

##### 2.1. Support Vector Regression

Kernels were regarded as a function with the formulation of inner product and have been a powerful tool in machine learning for their superior performance over a wide range of learning problems, such as isolated hand written digit recognition, text categorization, and face detection [21, 22].

Let be a nonempty set and be a real-valued and symmetric function. With the kernel matrix , is said to be a positive semidefinite kernel, if is positive semidefinite for any and . We call an indefinite kernel, if there exist and such that and .

In what follows, we list some widely used kernels.(i)Gaussian radial basis function kernel: .(ii)Polynomial kernel: , , .(iii)Sigmoid kernel: , , .

##### 2.2. Smoothing Approximation

Smoothing approximation is an effective method for solving nonsmooth optimization problems and has been widely used in the past decades. The main feature of smoothing method is to approximate the nonsmooth functions by a class of parameterized smooth functions. In this paper, we adopt the smoothing function defined as follows.

*Definition 1 (see [23]). *Let be a continuous function. One calls a smoothing function of , if is continuously differentiable for any fixed and holds for any .

Chen and Mangasarian constructed a class of smooth approximations of the function by convolution [20, 24] as follows. Let be a piecewise continuous density function satisfying Thenfrom to is well defined.

By different density functions, many popular smoothing functions of can be derived, such aswhere is the neural networks smoothing function, is called the CHKS (Chen-Harker-Kanzow-Smale) smoothing function, is called the uniform smoothing function, and is called the Picard smoothing function. The four functions belong to the class of the Chen-Mangasarian smoothing functions.

Many nonsmooth functions can be reformulated by using the plus function. We list some of them as follows:

So we can define a smoothing function for the above nonsmooth functions by a smoothing function of .

From Theorem and Corollary in [20], when is locally Lipschitz continuous at , the subdifferential associated with a smoothing functionis nonempty and bounded, and , where “con” denotes the convex hull. In [20, 23], it is shown that many smoothing functions satisfy the gradient consistencywhich is an important property of the smoothing methods and guarantees the convergence of smoothing methods with adaptive updating schemes of smoothing parameters to a stationary point of the original problem.

##### 2.3. Pseudoconvex Function

Pseudoconvex function is a class of functions, which may be nonsmooth or nonconvex, but brings us the opportunity to find the optimal solutions.

*Definition 2 (see [25]). *Let be a nonempty convex subset of . A function is said to be pseudoconvex on if, for any , one hasMany nonconvex functions in application are pseudoconvex, such as the Butterworth filter function, fraction function, and density function. Of particular interest in this paper is the fact that the Gaussian function with , , is pseudoconvex on .

##### 2.4. Project Operator

Let be a closed convex subset of . Then the* projection operator* to at is defined by and satisfies the following inequalities:(i) Suppose with ; then can be expressed by (ii) Suppose with of full row rank and ; then .

#### 3. Optimization Problems in MDF Continuous Hot-Pressing Process

In this section, we will give the optimization model considered in this paper. First, by the optimization and support vector machine theories, we show the optimization models for building up the relationships in MDF continuous hot-pressing process. Then, another optimization model for optimizing the parameters in the MDF continuous hot-pressing process is obtained. Thus, we express these two kinds of problems into a uniform formulation, which is the optimization problem considered in Section 3.

##### 3.1. Optimization Problem for Building up the Models of MDF Continuous Hot-Pressing Process

Denote and as two sets, where is the attribute vector on behalf of the hot-pressing plate properties; indicates the values of the qualities of hot-pressing plate. Let be the training data set of hot-pressing process, where obeys the unknown distribution and is IID (independent and identically distributed). Based on the support vector machine theory and the training data set, we would like to find a nonlinear function such that it approximates the training data set as much as possible.

With the kernel function and the Huber loss function, from the theory in [21], the dual optimization problem of the primal optimization problem of SVM is given asDenote and as the optimal solutions of (12). Then the regression function can be expressed bywhere can be calculated by one of the following two methods:

Denote in (12); then (12) can be reformulated aswhere , , , and with . For the optimal solution of (15), we call a support vector if . The optimal solution of (15) solved by the original methods often has almost 100% support vectors, which increases the complexity of the relation models largely. Thus, we introduce the problem deduced by (15); that is,with . In (43), is often called the regulation term, which is used to control the number of its support vectors.

Define the penalty function and then . From [19, Proposition ], is an optimal solution of (43) if and only if it is an optimal solution of the following problem:where . Thus, we can build up the relation models of hot-pressing process by solving problem (18).

##### 3.2. Optimization Problem for Optimizing the Parameters in MDF Hot-Pressing Process

Based on the relationships built up in Section 3.1, we focus on the modulus of rupture (MOR), modulus of elasticity (MOE), and internal bonding strength (IBS) of hot-pressing plate by optimizing the process parameters and slab attributes. Suppose the regression functions of MOR, MOS, and IBS with respect to some relative parameters based on the Gaussian radial basis function kernel areand based on the linear polynomial kernel arewhere are the variables in the data set for regression, and indicates the independent variable with hot-pressing temperature , hot-pressing pressure , hot-pressing time , and moisture content .

The regression functions in (19) satisfy the following two properties.(i) is continuously differentiable on , .(ii) and are not convex, but is pseudoconvex on , .

And the regression functions in (20) satisfy the following two properties.(i) is continuously differentiable on , .(ii) and are convex on , .

From the physical significance of MOR, MOS, and IBS, we suppose that the larger the numbers of MOR, MOS, and IBS, the better the quality of hot-pressing plate. In order to adopt the different demand on the indexes of the hot-pressing plate in different applications, we consider the following two cases in this part.

First, we focus on maximizing a single performance index of the hot-pressing plate when the other two performance indexes are within the certain areas. If we want to optimize the IBS, the corresponding optimization model for this case can be expressed bywhere indicate the upper bounds of hot-pressing temperature, hot-pressing pressure, hot-pressing time, and moisture content, and , are the feasible regions of MOR and MOS, respectively.

In order to let problem (21) be solved effectively, we let the objective function be with the Gaussian radial basis function, and the regression functions and in the constraints are with the linear polynomial kernel. Then, (21) iswhich is a pseudoconvex optimization problem with convex constraints.

Second, we would like to optimize the MOR, MOS, and IBS synthetically. For this demand, we consider the following optimization model:where indicate the importance of MOR, MOS, and IBS, are with the same meaning as in (21), and , , and are the expected values of MOR, MOS, and IBS. In particular, if MOR, MOS, and IBS are with the same importance in the quality of the hot-pressing plate, we can let , and we can let , , and , if the importance of MOR, MOS, and IBS is strictly monotone decreasing. Similar to the kernel functions in problem (21), we let , , and in problem (23) be with the Gaussian radial basis function, which means that problem (23) is also a pseudoconvex optimization problem with convex constraints.

##### 3.3. General Model

Based on analysis in Sections 3.1 and 3.2, we consider the following minimization problem in this paper:where , with , is continuously differentiable and pseudoconvex on , and () is continuously differentiable and convex on .

On the one hand, when , , , and and are defined as in (18), then problem (24) without reduces to problem (18). On the other hand, if we letthen problem (24) reduces to problem (22). Similar reformulation can be done for problem (23) by (24).

Therefore, problem (24) considered in this paper includes the optimization models for building up the relationships and optimizing the relative parameters in MDF continuous hot-pressing process.

In what follows, we denote as the feasible region of (24); that is, and is the optimal solution set of (24).

#### 4. Main Results

##### 4.1. Proposed Neural Network

In this subsection, we propose a one-layer recurrent neural network for solving problem (24), where we combine the penalty function and projection methods to solve the constraints and use the smoothing techniques to overcome the nonsmoothness of the objective function and penalty function.

Define the penalty function Then .

From the smoothing functions in (25) for the plus function, we define the smoothing function of as where

Form the results in [23], owns the following properties.

Lemma 3 (see [23]). *(i) For any , is continuously differentiable, and is also continuously differentiable for any fixed ;**(ii) , , ;**(iii) , , ;**(iv) is convex for any fixed , and .*

Then, has the following properties.

Lemma 4. * is a smoothing function and satisfies the following: *(i)* is convex for any fixed ;*(ii)*;*(iii)*, , .*

* Next, by the smoothing function for the absolute value function we define*

*Since , owns all properties in Lemma 8 and the following results hold.*

*Lemma 5. is a smoothing function in (24) with the following properties: (i) is pseudoconvex for any fixed ;(ii);(iii), , .*

*From the projected gradient method and the viscosity regularization method, we introduce the following neural network to solve (24):where and with .*

*By the definitions for , (34) can be expressed aswhere *

*To implement (34) by circuits, we can use the reformulated form of (34) as follows:Equation (34) can be seen as a network with three input and three output variables that are , , and . A simple block structure of the proposed network (37) implemented by circuits is presented in Figure 1.*