Malaria Research and Treatment

Malaria Research and Treatment / 2015 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 279028 |

Jaffu Chilongola, Arnold Ndaro, Hipolite Tarimo, Tamara Shedrack, Sakurani Barthazary, Robert Kaaya, Alutu Masokoto, Debora Kajeguka, Reginald A. Kavishe, John Lusingu, "Occurrence of pfatpase6 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms Associated with Artemisinin Resistance among Field Isolates of Plasmodium falciparum in North-Eastern Tanzania", Malaria Research and Treatment, vol. 2015, Article ID 279028, 7 pages, 2015.

Occurrence of pfatpase6 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms Associated with Artemisinin Resistance among Field Isolates of Plasmodium falciparum in North-Eastern Tanzania

Academic Editor: Sanjeev Krishna
Received21 Oct 2014
Accepted12 Dec 2014
Published05 Jan 2015


We aimed to determine the current prevalence of four P. falciparum candidate artemisinin resistance biomarkers L263E, E431K, A623E, and S769N in the pfatpase6 gene in a high transmission area in Tanzania in a retrospective cross sectional study using 154 archived samples collected from three previous malaria studies in 2010, 2011 and 2013. Mutations in pfatpase6 gene were detected in parasite DNA isolated from Dried Blood Spots by using PCR-RFLP. We observed overall allelic frequencies for L263E, E431K, A623E, and S769N to be 5.8% (9/154), 16.2% (25/154), 0.0% (0/154), and 3.9% (6/154). The L263E mutation was not detected in 2010 but occurred at 3.9% and 2.6% in 2011 and 2013 respectively. The L263E mutation showed a significant change of frequency between 2010 and 2011, but not between 2011 and 2013 . Frequency of E431K was highest of all without any clear trend whereas S769N increased from 2.2% in 2010 to 3.6% in 2011 and 5.1% in 2013. A623E mutation was not detected. The worrisome detection and the increase in the frequency of S769N and other mutations calls for urgent assessment of temporal changes of known artemisinin biomarkers in association with in vivo ACT efficacy.

1. Introduction

Resistance to antimalarial drugs is a major public health problem, which hinders the control of malaria. Widespread P. falciparum resistance to conventional antimalarial medicines such as chloroquine and sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) led to a change in malaria treatment policy in endemic countries [1]. ACTs have become the mainstay of falciparum malaria therapy in endemic areas [2]. Despite their excellent curative rate, reports of possible P. falciparum resistance to ACTs in Senegal, in French Guiana, and on the Thai-Cambodia border have recently been reported [3, 4] which suggests a probable decline in the effectiveness of ACTs and artesunate monotherapies against malaria. Although ACTs have clearly proven effective for the treatment of malaria in most endemic areas so far, concerns remain about their long-term implementation as first-line therapy [2]. This concern is exacerbated by the absolute dependence on artemisinin derivatives in virtually all of the existing antimalarial combination therapies, creating a substantial selection advantage for parasites with decreased susceptibility to artemisinins. SNPs in the Pfmdr-1, Pfcrt, and Pfdhfr genes have also been suggested to be markers of resistance to various antimalarial drugs, including ACTs [5, 6]. However, it has previously been suggested that a sarcoplasmic-endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase- (SERCA-) type protein, encoded by the pfatpase6 gene, is an important chemotherapeutic target of artemisinins [711]. Moreover, previous studies have proposed that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the pfatpase6 gene affect in vitro sensitivity to artemisinins [810]. In addition, previous studies have shown a considerable increase in artemether IC50 with pfatpase6 SNPs (L263E, E431K, A623E, and S769N), particularly, the pfatpase6 S769N mutation [12]. The L263E mutation and the combination of two pfatpase6 SNPs, E431K and A623E, have been shown to affect inhibition of PfSERCA by artemisinin [13, 14]. Many other SNPs have been identified as possible markers for artemisinin resistance although their validity is still under investigations. At a time when worrisome reports of reduced parasite sensitivity to ACTs are published from South East Asia and elsewhere [4, 15, 16], limited data is available on the status of resistance to ACTs in the Eastern Africa region since ACTs adoption about 10 years ago. The potential of molecular markers for predicting therapeutic efficacy has already been documented and demonstrated [5, 6, 12, 15, 17, 18]. In this study, we aimed to determine the prevalence of SNPs in the pfatpase6 gene at codons 263, 431, 623, and 769 in four high malaria transmission villages in Bondo ward in Handeni in North Eastern Tanzania, for changes in their frequencies over time between 2010 and 2013.

2. Methodology

2.1. Study Area, Procedures, and Sample Processing

The study was retrospective cross-sectional study whereby samples collected from three different cross-sectional malaria studies in 2010, 2011, and 2013 in Bondo Village were used. Bondo village is located in Handeni District in the coastal region of Tanga, North-Eastern Tanzania. The region is endemic to malaria with a perennial transmission. It is known to be a focal area for malaria drug resistance due to the drug selection pressure [19]. The study area has two rainy seasons per year which denotes the peaks of malaria transmission. The prevalence of malaria was 23% in 2013 (unpublished data). Dried blood spots (DBS) collected from microscopically confirmed malaria positive individuals were used. Only DBS with proper labels of date of collection and malaria positivity were included. A total of 154 DBS were selected and used in the study, 50, 52, and 52 from the 3 surveys in 2010, 2011, and 2013, respectively.

2.2. Isolation of P. falciparum Genomic DNA and PCR-RFLP

DNA was extracted from DBS using chelex100-saponin method as previously described earlier [20]. PCR reactions were carried out using a T100 Thermo Cycler (Biorad Laboratories Inc, San Francisco, CA, USA). Malaria parasite DNA was extracted using chelex-100 method as described previously [21]. Genotyping for ATPase6 SNPs was performed using PCR-RFLP methods as described elsewhere [20]. All PCR reagents and restriction endonucleases were purchased from Carramore (Holmfirth, Thongsbridge Mills, UK). Amplification of the pfatpase6 gene was carried out in a final volume of 25 μL containing 2 μL of extracted DNA, 250 nM primers, Taq buffer, 2 mM MgCl2, 125 μM each of the four deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates (dNTPs), and 0.4 U High Fidelity Platinum Taq polymerase. Secondary PCR reactions were carried out in similar conditions as the primary PCR except that 1 uL of primary PCR product was used as template. Conditions for restriction digestion, amplicon sizes and enzymes, are shown in Table 1. Secondary PCR products were digested with four enzymes each for a specific SNP: ApoI, MBoII, Cac8I, and DdeI for detection of mutations at positions L263E, E431K, A623E, and S769N, respectively. Restriction digestion was carried out as described by manufacturer. Restriction products were resolved on 1.5–3% agarose gel containing ethidium bromide and visualized under UV florescent illuminator, as a way of quality assurance.

Size (size)PositionRestriction enzymeProduct size (bp)

775L263EApoIL: 775E: 633 + 142
E431KMBoIIE: 299 + 241 + 117 + 69 + 49 K: 416 + 241 + 69 + 49
141A623ECac8IA: 114 + 27 E: 141
164S769NDdeI S: 136 + 28N: 164

2.3. Ethics

Ethical approval for this study was granted by the Kilimanjaro Christian Medical University College Ethics and Research Committee (CRERC) with a certificate number 554.

3. Results

Pfatpase6 gene was successfully amplified and genotyped in all 154 P.  falciparum field isolates. Detection of pfatpase6 SNPs within positions L263E, E431K, A623E, and S769N indicated 5.8% (9/154), 16.2% (25/154), 0.0% (0/154), and 3.9% (6/154) overall prevalence of pfatpase6 mutant genotypes (both heterozygous and homozygous mutant combined), respectively. The homozygous allelic frequency was distributed such that, for L263E, E431K, A623E, and S769N, frequencies were 8 (1.4%), 17 (11.0%), 0 (0.0%), and 5 (3.2%), respectively. Majority of parasites had the wild type allele: L263E, 145 (94.2%); E431K, 125 (81.2%); A623E, 0 (100%); and S769N, 148 (96.4%).

We analyse data to determine allelic frequency changes in the period from 2010 to 2013. Results for analyses that combined heterozygous and homozygous allelic distribution are presented in Table 2 and Figure 4. From this analysis, the L263E mutation was not detected in parasite isolates collected in 2010; however, it occurred at frequency of 6 (3.9%) and 4 (2.6%) in 2011 and 2013, respectively. The E431K mutation occurred at 26 (16.9%), 16 (10.4%), and 20 (13.0%) in 2010, 2011, and 2013, respectively. The A623E mutation was not detected in any of the isolates analyzed. We observed that the frequency of the S769N mutation was 3 (1.9%) in 2010, 6 (3.9%) in 2011, and 8 (5.2%) in 2013. Generally, the E431K mutation was the most frequent allele by 16.2%, followed by L263E (5.8%), S769N (3.9%), and A623E which was not detected. Occurrence of more than one of the studied mutations was rare, in which case only E431K and S769N occurred in 2 isolates in the years 2011 and 2013.

SNPPfatpase6 genotype201020112013Overall frequency

L263EWild type154 (100)148 (96.1)150 (97.4)145 (94.2)
Heterozygous0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)2 (1.3)
Mutant0 (0)6 (3.9)4 (2.6)8 (5.2)
H M0 (0)6 (3.9)4 (2.6)9 (5.8)

E431KWild type128 (83.1)138 (89.6)134 (87.0)125 (81.2)
Heterozygous9 (5.8)6 (3.9)4 (2.6)8 (5.2)
Mutant18 (11.7)11 (7.1)16 (10.4)17 (11.0)
H M26 (16.9)16 (10.4)20 (13.0)25 (16.2)

A623EWild type154 (100)154 (100)154 (100)154 (100)
Heterozygous0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
Mutant0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
H M0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)

S769NWild type150 (97.4)148 (96.1)146 (94.8)148 (96.1)
Heterozygous2 (1.3)0 (0)0 (0)1
Mutant2 (1.3)6 (3.9)8 (5.2)5 (3.2)
H M3 (1.9)6 (3.9)8 (5.2)6 (3.9)

H M: mutant and heterozygous genotype frequencies combined.

We explored data for all four SNPs to determine if there was a significant change in frequency between the years 2010 and 2013 using Fisher’s test. To accomplish this analysis, we combined heterozygous and homozygous mutants for the analyses and data are presented in Table 3. We could not demonstrate a significant change in prevalence of any of the SNPs between all three years 2010 through 2013. This is evidenced by the overlapping 95% CI values across the years shown in Table 3. However, the L263E mutation showed the highest change across the three years, which was closest to significance (, ). Pairwise comparisons of frequencies by Fisher’s exact test revealed a significant change of L263E frequency only between 2010 and 2011, but not between 2011 and 2013 ().


95% CI0.0–3.01.6–8.70.8–6.9

95% CI11.5–23.96.2–16.68.3–19.6

95% CI0.0–3.00.0–3.00.0–3.0

95% CI0.5–6.11.6–8.72.4–10.3

Fisher’s exact test revealed a significant change between the two points ().
Combined, the frequency change of L263E and S769N over the three years was statistically significant by Fisher’s exact test ().

4. Discussion

Monitoring of potential biomarkers for antimalarial drug resistance is a sustainable and relatively cheap tool for monitoring emergency of drug resistance early enough before in vivo efficacy studies are conducted. Many previous studies have reported molecular markers for ACT partner drugs resistance (lumefantrine and amodiaquine and even quinine [20, 2227]). Artemisinin is thought to inhibit pfatpase6 of the parasite [7, 9, 14, 28].

We detected L263E, E431K, and S769N mutations at varying frequencies over the period from 2010 to 2013, a finding that supports previous reports on the high diversity of the pfatpase6 gene (Figures 1, 2, and 3). Our findings also support previous arguments that many point mutations in the pfatpase6 gene may exist in one geographical location [3, 9]. Previous studies in Tanzania and Brazil and China have not detected the S769N mutation in field isolates [8, 9, 11]. We see in the current study that the frequency of the mutation shows an increasing pattern from 2010 to 2013. To the best of our understanding, this is the first time this mutation is detected in Tanzania and the Eastern African region. The detection and observed increase in the prevalence of the S769N mutation in the study region are both interesting and worrisome since it may imply early signs of selection of resistant parasites and possible emergency of artemisinin resistance. We did not detect any isolate with the A623E mutation in this study, consistent with previous studies previously done in Tanzania [11].

The L263E mutation was not detected in samples collected in 2010 but emerged in 2011 at a frequency of 3.9%. Previous studies reported this mutation to have been studied mainly in DNA manipulation experiments and not in vivo [29, 30]. The detection for the first time of the L263E mutation in the current study using field parasite samples may have many implications including intense drug selection pressure of mutant strains in the study area. The role of the L263E mutation in conferring ACT resistance/reduced responses by field P. falciparum isolates needs to be monitored and further validated.

The E431K mutation occurred at the highest frequency compared to other studied mutations. This is similar to what was reported in previous studies done in Cameroon and Iran [21, 31, 32]. The high frequency of the E431K mutation and the absence of a consistent trend in its frequency from year 2010 through 2013 indicate its common occurrence in the study area with a doubtful previously proposed association with drug resistance. The mutation was previously reported, in in vitro studies, to be associated with increased artesunate IC50 in Senegal and elsewhere [9, 14] although a study in Iran showed a high frequency of the E431K mutation in both ACT exposed and ACT unexposed parasites, indicating its questionable role in ACT resistance [21]. The E431K mutation is the most common mutation of the pfatpase6 gene found in many African and Asian countries including Tanzania, but its direct association with ACTs resistance has been reported to depend on its co-occurrence with other SNPs in the pfatpase6 gene, usually the L623E mutation (NB change A623E to L623E) [32].

Our data show a sudden increase of L263E and S769N SNPs from 2010 to 2013. The relatively fast increase of the two SNPs within a short period of time from 2010 to 2013 may have a number of different explanations. For many years, the study area had experienced perennial and holoendemic malaria transmission. However, in recent years, malaria transmission has declined substantially and entomological inoculation rate has declined from 148 infectious bites per person per year in 2000 [33] to 39 infectious bites per person per year in 2013 (unpublished data, 2013). The traditional debate on the stimuli responsible for emergency of resistant strains of malaria parasites proposes either host immunity or the drug pressure [16] or both. Other studies have linked transmission intensity and drug resistance [34, 35] with fitness competitiveness between wild and mutant strains [16]. Previous work has also provided evidence that antimalarial resistance emerged first in low transmission areas and spread to other parts [33, 34].

Based on the low transmission theory, the rapidly declining transmission patterns in the study area and neighboring areas may partly explain the rapid increase in the frequencies of two of the studied SNPs which are more closely associated with antimalaria resistance. The renewed and sustained reinforcement of malaria control programs in Tanzania based on both ACT chemotherapy and integrated vector control may have contributed greatly to the decline in malaria transmission and hence favor the increase of resistant strain frequencies. This argument is supported by findings from a recent study conducted in Kenya that reported a significant decline of early response rates of P. falciparum infections to ACTs three years after they were introduced [36].

Many factors could commonly contribute to the key mechanisms of emergence of resistant parasite strains in the study area, in common with other relatively underdeveloped malaria endemic regions. Most important is the poor reinforcement of the concept of rational therapy. Improper use of antimalaria drugs is based on presumptive, clinical diagnosis alone or on misdiagnosis due to poor technical expertise on interpretation of laboratory results [2, 37, 38]. Due to incompetence of health delivery systems in many malaria endemic countries, health ministries have made artemisinins available to the private sector to increase patients’ access to the drug [39]. Good as it is, this approach has, however, increased the risks that drug use will be uncontrolled [40, 41] since adherence and indication are not properly controlled.

The prevalence of counterfeit or clinically substandard ACTs that contain small quantities of the artemisinin derivatives threatens to subvert ACT efficacy as it provides an ideal mechanism for the selection of resistance. Recent estimates show that 33%–53% of all ACT tablets in mainland Southeast Asia region are counterfeit [42]. A previous study carried out in six African countries also documented substandard medicines in 35% of ACTs purchased from private pharmacies and found artemisinin monotherapy to be common despite the appeal by WHO to halt its production [39]. Lastly, while almost all previously reported antimalarial resistance started in Southwest Asia and spread to other parts of the world, antimalarial resistance in Tanzania has almost always started in the study area and spread to other parts of the country. This augments the need to urgently evaluate ACT efficacy status in the North Eastern region of Tanzania.

5. Conclusion

Although our observations are based on molecular detection of resistance biomarkers only, more studies that associate biomarkers with ACT clinical efficacy should be conducted to ascertain the current status of ACT effectiveness. Regular monitoring of ACT resistance biomarkers should continue in order to detect the earliest signs of possible emergency of ACT resistance.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


This study was conducted with financial support from the MRTP under the HRSA (US National Institutes of Health) funded KCMC-MEPI Grant no. T84HA21123-02. This support is highly acknowledged. MCDC is also acknowledged for financial support of the second author (Arnold Ndaro) for M.S. study whose thesis project was part of this study. The authors thank Marco van Zwetselaar and Tolbert Sonda, IT Consultants and Statisticians at Kilimanjaro Clinical Research Institute (KCRI), for their valuable statistical advice.


  1. R. E. Martin, R. V. Marchetti, A. I. Cowan, S. M. Howitt, S. Bröer, and K. Kirk, “Chloroquine transport via the malaria parasite's chloroquine resistance transporter,” Science, vol. 325, no. 5948, pp. 1680–1682, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. C. J. M. Whitty, C. Chandler, E. Ansah, T. Leslie, and S. G. Staedke, “Deployment of ACT antimalarials for treatment of malaria: challenges and opportunities,” Malaria Journal, vol. 7, supplement 1, article S7, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. H. Noedl, Y. Se, K. Schaecher, B. L. Smith, D. Socheat, and M. M. Fukuda, “Evidence of artemisinin-resistant malaria in Western Cambodia,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 359, no. 24, pp. 2619–2620, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. H. Noedl, D. Socheat, and W. Satimai, “Artemisinin-resistant malaria in Asia,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 361, no. 5, pp. 540–541, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. R. A. Kavishe, P. Paulo, R. D. Kaaya et al., “Surveillance of artemether-lumefantrine associated Plasmodium falciparum multidrug resistance protein-1 gene polymorphisms in Tanzania,” Malaria Journal, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 264, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. I. Matondo, G. S. Temba, A. A. Kavishe et al., “High levels of sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance Pfdhfr-Pfdhps quintuple mutations: a cross sectional survey of six regions in Tanzania,” Malaria Journal, vol. 13, no. 1, article 152, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. U. Eckstein-Ludwig, R. J. Webb, I. D. A. Van Goethem et al., “Artemisinins target the SERCA of Plasmodium falciparum,” Nature, vol. 424, no. 6951, pp. 957–961, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. I. D. Ferreira, A. Martinelli, L. A. Rodrigues et al., “Plasmodium falciparum from Pará state (Brazil) shows satisfactory in vitro response to artemisinin derivatives and absence of the S769N mutation in the SERCA-type PfATPase6,” Tropical Medicine & International Health, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 199–207, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. R. Jambou, E. Legrand, M. Niang et al., “Resistance of Plasmodium falciparum field isolates to in-vitro artemether and point mutations of the SERCA-type PfATPase6,” The Lancet, vol. 366, no. 9501, pp. 1960–1963, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. M. Menegon, A. R. Sannella, G. Majori, and C. Severini, “Detection of novel point mutations in the Plasmodium falciparumATPase6 candidate gene for resistance to artemisinins,” Parasitology International, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 233–235, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. K. Mugittu, B. Genton, H. Mshinda, and H. P. Beck, “Molecular monitoring of Plasmodium falciparum resistance to artemisinin in Tanzania,” Malaria Journal, vol. 5, article 126, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. R. Jambou, A. Martinelli, J. Pinto et al., “Geographic structuring of the Plasmodium falciparum sarco (endo) plasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase (PfSERCA) gene diversity,” PLoS ONE, vol. 5, no. 2, Article ID e9424, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. S. Takala-Harrison, T. G. Clark, C. G. Jacob et al., “Genetic loci associated with delayed clearance of Plasmodium falciparum following artemisinin treatment in Southeast Asia,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 240–245, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. A.-C. Uhlemann, A. Cameron, U. Eckstein-Ludwig et al., “A single amino acid residue can determine the sensitivity of SERCAs to artemisinins,” Nature Structural and Molecular Biology, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 628–629, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. A. A. Djimdé, A. Dolo, A. Ouattara, S. Diakité, C. V. Plowe, and O. K. Doumbo, “Molecular diagnosis of resistance to antimalarial drugs during epidemics and in war zones,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 190, no. 4, pp. 853–855, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. M. L. Ibrahim, N. Steenkeste, N. Khim et al., “Field-based evidence of fast and global increase of Plasmodium falciparum drug-resistance by DNA-microarrays and PCR/RFLP in Niger,” Malaria Journal, vol. 8, no. 32, pp. 1–9, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  17. J. G. Kublin, F. K. Dzinjalamala, D. D. Kamwendo et al., “Molecular markers for failure of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and chlorproguanil-dapsone treatment of Plasmodium falciparum malaria,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 185, no. 3, pp. 380–388, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. K. Laufer, P. C. Thesing, N. D. Eddington et al., “Return of chloroquine antimalarial efficacy in Malawi,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 355, no. 19, pp. 1959–1966, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. S. Gesase, R. D. Gosling, R. Hashim et al., “High resistance of Plasmodium falciparum to sulphadoxine/pyrimethamine in Northern Tanzania and the emergence of dhps resistance mutation at codon 581,” PLoS ONE, vol. 4, no. 2, Article ID e4569, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. V. Lakshmanan, P. G. Bray, D. Verdier-Pinard et al., “A critical role for PfCRT K76T in Plasmodium falciparum verapamil-reversible chloroquine resistance,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 24, no. 13, pp. 2294–2305, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. S. Zakeri, S. Hemati, S. Pirahmadi, M. Afsharpad, A. Raeisi, and N. D. Djadid, “Molecular assessment of atpase6 mutations associated with artemisinin resistance among unexposed and exposed Plasmodium falciparum clinical isolates to artemisinin-based combination therapy,” Malaria Journal, vol. 11, article 373, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. M. T. Duraisingh, C. Roper, D. Walliker, and D. C. Warhurst, “Increased sensitivity to the antimalarials mefloquine and artemisinin is conferred by mutations in the pfmdr1 gene of Plasmodium falciparum,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 955–961, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. M. T. Duraisingh and A. F. Cowman, “Contribution of the pfmdr1 gene to antimalarial drug-resistance,” Acta Tropica, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 181–190, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. R. N. Price, A.-C. Uhlemann, M. van Vugt et al., “Molecular and pharmacological determinants of the therapeutic response to artemether-lumefentrine in multidrug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 42, no. 11, pp. 1570–1577, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. M. B. Reed, K. J. Sallba, S. R. Caruana, K. Kirk, and A. F. Cowman, “Pgh1 modulates sensitivity and resistance to multiple antimalarials in Plasmodium falciparum,” Nature, vol. 403, no. 6772, pp. 906–909, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. P. Rohrbach, C. P. Sanchez, K. Hayton et al., “Genetic linkage of pfmdr1 with food vacuolar solute import in Plasmodium falciparum,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 25, no. 13, pp. 3000–3011, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. A. B. S. Sidhu, S. G. Valderramos, and D. A. Fidock, “pfmdr1 mutations contribute to quinine resistance and enhance mefloquine and artemisinin sensitivity in Plasmodium falciparum,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 913–926, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. S. R. Meshnick, “Artemisinin: mechanisms of action, resistance and toxicity,” International Journal for Parasitology, vol. 32, no. 13, pp. 1655–1660, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. L. Cui, Z. Wang, H. Jiang, D. Parker, H. Wang, and X.-Z. Su, “Lack of association of the S769N mutation in Plasmodium falciparum SERCA (PfATP6) with resistance to artemisinins,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 2546–2552, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. D. A. Fidock, R. T. Eastman, S. A. Ward, and S. R. Meshnick, “Recent highlights in antimalarial drug resistance and chemotherapy research,” Trends in Parasitology, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 537–544, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. S. Dahlström, M. I. Veiga, P. Ferreira et al., “Diversity of the sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase orthologue of Plasmodium falciparum (PfATP6),” Infection, Genetics and Evolution, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 340–345, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. R. Tahar, P. Ringwald, and L. K. Basco, “Molecular epidemiology of malaria in Cameroon. XXVIII. In vitro activity of dihydroartemisinin against clinical isolates of Plasmodium falciparum and sequence analysis of the P. falciparum ATPase 6 gene,” The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 13–18, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  33. I. M. Hastings, “Malaria control and the evolution of drug resistance: an intriguing link,” Trends in Parasitology, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 70–73, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. C. A. Maxwell, W. Chambo, M. Mwaimu, F. Magogo, I. A. Carneiro, and C. F. Curtis, “Variation of malaria transmission and morbidity with altitude in Tanzania and with introduction of alphacypermethrin treated nets,” Malaria Journal, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 28, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  35. A. O. Talisuna, P. Langi, N. Bakyaita et al., “Intensity of malaria transmission, antimalarial-drug use and resistance in Uganda: what is the relationship between these three factors?” Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 310–317, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. S. Borrmann, P. Sasi, L. Mwai et al., “Declining responsiveness of Plasmodium falciparum infections to artemisinin-based combination treatments on the Kenyan coast,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 11, Article ID e26005, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. K. Källander, J. Nsungwa-Sabiiti, and S. Peterson, “Symptom overlap for malaria and pneumonia—policy implications for home management strategies,” Acta Tropica, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 211–214, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. C. Mwanziva, S. Shekalaghe, A. Ndaro et al., “Overuse of artemisinin-combination therapy in Mto wa Mbu (river of mosquitoes), an area misinterpreted as high endemic for malaria,” Malaria Journal, vol. 7, no. 1, article 232, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. R. Bate, R. Tren, K. Hess, and A. Attaran, “Physical and chemical stability of expired fixed dose combination artemether-lumefantrine in uncontrolled tropical conditions,” Malaria Journal, vol. 8, no. 1, article 33, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. M. B. Denis, R. Tsuyuoka, P. Lim et al., “Efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in northwest Cambodia,” Tropical Medicine & International Health, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 1800–1807, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. D. O. Simba, D. C. Kakoko, M. Warsame et al., “Understanding caretakers' dilemma in deciding whether or not to adhere with referral advice after pre-referral treatment with rectal artesunate,” Malaria Journal, vol. 9, no. 1, article 123, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. P. N. Newton, F. M. Fernández, A. Plançon et al., “A collaborative epidemiological investigation into the criminal fake artesunate trade in South East Asia,” PLoS Medicine, vol. 5, no. 2, article e32, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Jaffu Chilongola et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles