Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Neural Plasticity
Volume 2016, Article ID 1245259, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/1245259
Research Article

Neuronal Substrates Underlying Performance Variability in Well-Trained Skillful Motor Task in Humans

1Center for Information and Neural Networks (CiNet), National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (NICT), 1-4 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
2Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, 5-3-1 Kojimachi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 102-0083, Japan
3School of Health and Sport Sciences, Osaka University of Health and Sport Sciences, 1-1 Asashirodai, Kumatori-cho, Sennan-gun, Osaka 590-0496, Japan
4Graduate School of Medicine and Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, 2-15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan

Received 30 March 2016; Accepted 12 June 2016

Academic Editor: Jun Ueda

Copyright © 2016 Nobuaki Mizuguchi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. K. S. Chaisanguanthum, H. H. Shen, and P. N. Sabes, “Motor variability arises from a slow random walk in neural state,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 34, no. 36, pp. 12071–12080, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. M. Churchland, A. Afshar, and K. V. Shenoy, “A central source of movement variability,” Neuron, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 1085–1096, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. Duque, L. Labruna, S. Verset, E. Olivier, and R. B. Ivry, “Dissociating the role of prefrontal and premotor cortices in controlling inhibitory mechanisms during motor preparation,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 806–816, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. A. Michaels, B. Dann, R. W. Intveld, and H. Scherberger, “Predicting reaction time from the neural state space of the premotor and parietal grasping network,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 35, no. 32, pp. 11415–11432, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. R. C. Oldfield, “The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 97–113, 1971. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. P. Walker, T. Brakefield, J. A. Hobson, and R. Stickgold, “Dissociable stages of human memory consolidation and reconsolidation,” Nature, vol. 425, no. 6958, pp. 616–620, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. N. Censor, M. A. Dimyan, and L. G. Cohen, “Modification of existing human motor memories is enabled by primary cortical processing during memory reactivation,” Current Biology, vol. 20, no. 17, pp. 1545–1549, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. R. A. Schmidt and T. D. Lee, Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis, Human Kinetics, Champaign, Ill, USA, 5th edition, 2011.
  9. J. Reis, J. T. Fischer, G. Prichard, C. Weiller, L. G. Cohen, and B. Fritsch, “Time- but not sleep-dependent consolidation of tDCS-enhanced visuomotor skills,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 109–117, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. K. J. Friston, P. Fletcher, O. Josephs, A. Holmes, M. D. Rugg, and R. Turner, “Event-related fMRI: characterizing differential responses,” NeuroImage, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 30–40, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. K. J. Friston, A. P. Holmes, and K. J. Worsley, “How many subjects constitute a study?” NeuroImage, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. B. Eickhoff, K. E. Stephan, H. Mohlberg et al., “A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data,” NeuroImage, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 1325–1335, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. D. Keeser, T. Meindl, J. Bor et al., “Prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation changes connectivity of resting-state networks during fMRI,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 31, no. 43, pp. 15284–15293, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. C. A. Dockery, R. Hueckel-Weng, N. Birbaumer, and C. Plewnia, “Enhancement of planning ability by transcranial direct current stimulation,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 29, no. 22, pp. 7271–7277, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. P. C. Miranda, M. Lomarev, and M. Hallett, “Modeling the current distribution during transcranial direct current stimulation,” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 117, no. 7, pp. 1623–1629, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. A. Nitsche and W. Paulus, “Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 527, no. 3, pp. 633–639, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. C. S. Carter, T. S. Braver, D. M. Barch, M. M. Botvinick, D. Noll, and J. D. Cohen, “Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance,” Science, vol. 280, no. 5364, pp. 747–749, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. R. Hester, C. Fassbender, and H. Garavan, “Individual differences in error processing: a review and reanalysis of three event-related fMRI studies using the GO/NOGO task,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 14, no. 9, pp. 986–994, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. T. A. Klein, T. Endrass, N. Kathmann, J. Neumann, D. Y. von Cramon, and M. Ullsperger, “Neural correlates of error awareness,” NeuroImage, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 1774–1781, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. G. D. Logan and M. J. C. Crump, “Cognitive illusions of authorship reveal hierarchical error detection in skilled typists,” Science, vol. 330, no. 6004, pp. 683–686, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. D. Liebetanz, M. A. Nitsche, F. Tergau, and W. Paulus, “Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability,” Brain, vol. 125, no. 10, pp. 2238–2247, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. B. Fritsch, J. Reis, K. Martinowich et al., “Direct current stimulation promotes BDNF-dependent synaptic plasticity: potential implications for motor learning,” Neuron, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 198–204, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. A. Nitsche, M. S. Nitsche, C. C. Klein, F. Tergau, J. C. Rothwell, and W. Paulus, “Level of action of cathodal DC polarisation induced inhibition of the human motor cortex,” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 114, no. 4, pp. 600–604, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. L. Jacobson, M. Koslowsky, and M. Lavidor, “TDCS polarity effects in motor and cognitive domains: a meta-analytical review,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 216, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. G. Batsikadze, V. Moliadze, W. Paulus, M.-F. Kuo, and M. A. Nitsche, “Partially non-linear stimulation intensity-dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 591, no. 7, pp. 1987–2000, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. S. Furuya, M. Klaus, M. A. Nitsche, W. Paulus, and E. Altenmüller, “Ceiling effects prevent further improvement of transcranial stimulation in skilled musicians,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 34, no. 41, pp. 13834–13839, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. L. M. Li, K. Uehara, and T. Hanakawa, “The contribution of interindividual factors to variability of response in transcranial direct current stimulation studies,” Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, vol. 9, article 181, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus