Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Neural Plasticity
Volume 2016, Article ID 6720420, 16 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6720420
Research Article

Loss of Myh14 Increases Susceptibility to Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in CBA/CaJ Mice

1School of Life Science and Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education for Experimental Teratology, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China
2Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan 250033, China

Received 31 July 2016; Revised 8 October 2016; Accepted 7 November 2016

Academic Editor: Jian Wang

Copyright © 2016 Xiaolong Fu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. C. E. Graham, J. Basappa, and D. E. Vetter, “A corticotropin-releasing factor system expressed in the cochlea modulates hearing sensitivity and protects against noise-induced hearing loss,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 246–258, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. Lavinsky, M. Ge, A. L. Crow et al., “The genetic architecture of noise-induced hearing loss: evidence for a gene-by-environment interaction,” G3: Genes/Genomes/Genetics, vol. 116, no. 032516, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. J. E. Hawkins Jr., “Comparative otopathology: aging, noise, and ototoxic drugs,” Advances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, vol. 20, pp. 125–141, 1973. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. H. Spoendlin, “Retrograde degeneration of the cochlear nerve,” Acta Oto-Laryngologica, vol. 79, no. 3–6, pp. 266–275, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. W. Roberson and E. W. Rubel, “Cell division in the gerbil cochlea after acoustic trauma,” Otology & Neurotology, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 28–34, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  6. A. J. Hudspeth, “How hearing happens,” Neuron, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 947–950, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. J. Finneran, “Noise-induced hearing loss in marine mammals: a review of temporary threshold shift studies from 1996 to 2015,” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 138, no. 3, pp. 1702–1726, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. R. de Iriarte Rodríguez, M. Magariños, V. Pfeiffer, U. R. Rapp, and I. Varela-Nieto, “C-Raf deficiency leads to hearing loss and increased noise susceptibility,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 72, no. 20, pp. 3983–3998, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. P.-I. Carlsson, L. Van Laer, E. Borg et al., “The influence of genetic variation in oxidative stress genes on human noise susceptibility,” Hearing Research, vol. 202, no. 1-2, pp. 87–96, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Pawlaczyk-Luszczynska, A. Dudarewicz, K. Zaborowski, M. Zamojska, and M. Sliwinska-Kowalska, “Noise induced hearing loss: research in central, eastern and south-eastern Europe and newly independent states,” Noise and Health, vol. 15, no. 62, pp. 55–66, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. Konings, L. Van Laer, M. Pawelczyk et al., “Association between variations in CAT and noise-induced hearing loss in two independent noise-exposed populations,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 16, no. 15, pp. 1872–1883, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. Sliwinska-Kowalska and M. Pawelczyk, “Contribution of genetic factors to noise-induced hearing loss: a human studies review,” Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research, vol. 752, no. 1, pp. 61–65, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. X. Zhou, S. Chen, L. Xie et al., “Reduced connexin26 in the mature cochlea increases susceptibility to noise-induced hearing lossin mice,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 17, no. 3, p. 301, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. D. Yan, Y. Zhu, T. Walsh et al., “Mutation of the ATP-gated P2X2 receptor leads to progressive hearing loss and increased susceptibility to noise,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 110, no. 6, pp. 2228–2233, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. Delmaghani, J. Defourny, A. Aghaie et al., “Hypervulnerability to sound exposure through impaired adaptive proliferation of peroxisomes,” Cell, vol. 163, no. 4, pp. 894–906, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. P. J. Kozel, R. R. Davis, E. F. Krieg, G. E. Shull, and L. C. Erway, “Deficiency in plasma membrane calcium ATPase isoform 2 increases susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss in mice,” Hearing Research, vol. 164, no. 1-2, pp. 231–239, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. G. D. Housley, R. Morton-Jones, S. M. Vlajkovic et al., “ATP-gated ion channels mediate adaptationto elevated sound levels,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 110, no. 18, pp. 7494–7499, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. R. H. Holme and K. P. Steel, “Progressive hearing loss and increased susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss in mice carrying a Cdh23 but not a Myo7a mutation,” Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 66–79, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. Konings, L. Van Laer, A. Wiktorek-Smagur et al., “Candidate gene association study for noise-induced hearing loss in two independent noise-exposed populations,” Annals of Human Genetics, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 215–224, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. Sliwinska-Kowalska and M. Pawelczyk, “Contribution of genetic factors to noise-induced hearing loss: a human studies review,” Mutation Research—Reviews in Mutation Research, vol. 752, no. 1, pp. 61–65, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. E. Golomb, X. Ma, S. S. Jana et al., “Identification and characterization of nonmuscle myosin II-C, a new member of the myosin II family,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, no. 4, pp. 2800–2808, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. N. Billington, A. Wang, J. Mao, R. S. Adelstein, and J. R. Sellers, “Characterization of three full-length human nonmuscle myosin II paralogs,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 288, no. 46, pp. 33398–33410, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. Ebrahim, T. Fujita, B. A. Millis et al., “NMII forms a contractile transcellular sarcomeric network to regulate apical cell junctions and tissue geometry,” Current Biology, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 731–736, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. S. R. Wylie and P. D. Chantler, “Myosin IIC: a third molecular motor driving neuronal dynamics,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 3956–3968, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. H. Yang, H. Wang, and R. Jaenisch, “Generating genetically modified mice using CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering,” Nature Protocols, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1956–1968, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. Y. Fujihara and M. Ikawa, “CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing in mice by single plasmid injection,” Methods in Enzymoogy, vol. 546, no. 2, pp. 319–336, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. Y. Jin, N. Ren, S. Li et al., “Deletion of Brg1 causes abnormal hair cell planer polarity, hair cell anchorage, and scar formation in mouse cochlea,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, Article ID 27124, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. A. M. Jimenez, B. B. Stagner, G. K. Martin, and B. L. Lonsbury-Martin, “Susceptibility of DPOAEs to sound overexposure in inbred mice with AHL,” Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 233–245, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. K. K. Ohlemiller, “Contributions of mouse models to understanding of age- and noise-related hearing loss,” Brain Research, vol. 1901, no. 1, pp. 89–102, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  30. A. Bahloul, M.-C. Simmler, V. Michel et al., “Vezatin, an integral membrane protein of adherens junctions, is required for the sound resilience of cochlear hair cells,” EMBO Molecular Medicine, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 125–138, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. L. C. Erway, Y.-W. Shiau, R. R. Davis, and E. F. Krieg, “Genetics of age-related hearing loss in mice. III. Susceptibility of inbred and F1 hybrid strains to noise-induced hearing loss,” Hearing Research, vol. 93, no. 1-2, pp. 181–187, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. S. Hequembourg and M. C. Liberman, “Spiral ligament pathology: a major aspect of age-related cochlear degeneration in C57BL/6 mice,” Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 118–129, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. N. Yoshida, S. J. Hequembourg, C. A. Atencio, J. J. Rosowski, and M. C. Liberman, “Acoustic injury in mice: 129/SvEv is exceptionally resistant to noise-induced hearing loss,” Hearing Research, vol. 141, no. 1-2, pp. 97–106, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. Q. Y. Zheng, K. R. Johnson, and L. C. Erway, “Assessment of hearing in 80 inbred strains of mice by ABR threshold analyses,” Hearing Research, vol. 130, no. 1-2, pp. 94–107, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. H. Wang, H. Yang, C. Shivalila et al., “One-step generation of mice carrying mutations in multiple genes by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering,” Cell, vol. 153, no. 4, pp. 910–918, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. X. Ma, S. S. Jana, M. A. Conti, S. Kawamoto, W. C. Claycomb, and R. S. Adelstein, “Ablation of nonmuscle myosin II-B and II-C reveals a role for nonmuscle myosin II in cardiac myocyte karyokinesis,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 21, no. 22, pp. 3952–3962, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. K. K. Ohlemiller, J. S. Wright, and A. F. Heidbreder, “Vulnerability to noise-induced hearing loss in ‘middle-aged’ and young adult mice: a dose-response approach in CBA, C57BL, and BALB inbred strains,” Hearing Research, vol. 149, no. 1-2, pp. 239–247, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. J. G. Turner, J. L. Parrish, L. F. Hughes, L. A. Toth, and D. M. Caspary, “Hearing in laboratory animals: strain differences and nonauditory effects of noise,” Comparative Medicine, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 12–23, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  39. C. Bertet, L. Sulak, and T. Lecuit, “Myosin-dependent junction remodelling controls planar cell intercalation and axis elongation,” Nature, vol. 429, no. 6992, pp. 667–671, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. M. A. Conti, S. Even-Ram, C. Liu, K. M. Yamada, and R. S. Adelstein, “Defects in cell adhesion and the visceral endoderm following ablation of nonmuscle myosin heavy chain II-A in mice,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, no. 40, pp. 41263–41266, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. N. Yamamoto, T. Okano, X. Ma, R. S. Adelstein, and M. W. Kelley, “Myosin II regulates extension, growth and patterning in the mammalian cochlear duct,” Development, vol. 136, no. 12, pp. 1977–1986, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. E. D. Ozkan, M. Aceti, T. K. Creson et al., “Input-specific regulation of hippocampal circuit maturation by non-muscle myosin IIB,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 134, no. 3, pp. 429–444, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. H. Yuan, X. Wang, K. Hill et al., “Autophagy attenuates noise-induced hearing loss by reducing oxidative stress,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 22, no. 15, pp. 1308–1324, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. E. Borg, “Loss of hair cells and threshold sensitivity during prolonged noise exposure in normotensive albino rats,” Hearing Research, vol. 30, no. 2-3, pp. 119–126, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  45. G. D. Chen and L. D. Fechter, “The relationship between noise-induced hearing loss and hair cell loss in rats,” Hearing Research, vol. 177, no. 1-2, pp. 81–90, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. H. P. Zenner, G. Reuter, U. Zimmermann, A. H. Gitter, C. Fermin, and E. L. LePage, “Transitory endolymph leakage induced hearing loss and tinnitus: depolarization, biphasic shortening and loss of electromotility of outer hair cells,” European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, vol. 251, no. 3, pp. 143–153, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. G. Nayak, S. I. Lee, R. Yousaf et al., “Tricellulin deficiency affects tight junction architecture and cochlear hair cells,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 123, no. 9, pp. 4036–4049, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus