The Instant Effects of Continuous Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation at Acupoints on the Functional Connectivity of Amygdala in Migraine without Aura: A Preliminary Study

Luo, Wenting; Zhang, Yue; Yan, Zhaoxian; Liu, Xian; Hou, Xiaoyan; Chen, Weicui; Ye, Yongsong; Li, Hui; Liu, Bo

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8870589

Neural Plasticity

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments Supplementary Materials References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Acupuncture Therapies and Neuroplasticity 2020

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 | Article ID 8870589 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8870589

The Instant Effects of Continuous Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation at Acupoints on the Functional Connectivity of Amygdala in Migraine without Aura: A Preliminary Study

Wenting Luo,^1,2Yue Zhang,¹Zhaoxian Yan,¹Xian Liu,¹Xiaoyan Hou,¹Weicui Chen,¹Yongsong Ye,¹Hui Li,³and Bo Liu¹

Academic Editor: Lu Wang

Received26 Jun 2020

Revised21 Oct 2020

Accepted28 Oct 2020

Published10 Dec 2020

Abstract

Background. A growing body of evidence suggests that both auricular acupuncture and transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) can induce antinociception and relieve symptoms of migraine. However, their instant effects and central treatment mechanism remain unclear. Many studies proved that the amygdalae play a vital role not only in emotion modulation but also in pain processing. In this study, we investigated the modulation effects of continuous taVNS at acupoints on the FC of the bilateral amygdalae in MwoA. Methods. Thirty episodic migraineurs were recruited for the single-blind, crossover functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study. Each participant attended two kinds of eight-minute stimulations, taVNS and sham-taVNS (staVNS), separated by seven days in random order. Finally, 27 of them were included in the analysis of seed-to-voxel FC with the left/right amygdala as seeds. Results. Compared with staVNS, the FC decreased during taVNS between the left amygdala and left middle frontal gyrus (MFG), left dorsolateral superior frontal gyrus, right supplementary motor area (SMA), bilateral paracentral lobules, bilateral postcingulum gyrus, and right frontal superior medial gyrus, so did the FC of the right amygdala and left MFG. A significant positive correlation was observed between the FC of the left amygdala and right SMA and the frequency/total time of migraine attacks during the preceding four weeks. Conclusion. Continuous taVNS at acupoints can modulate the FC between the bilateral amygdalae and pain-related brain regions in MwoA, involving the limbic system, default mode network, and pain matrix, with obvious differences between the left amygdala and the right amygdala. The taVNS may produce treatment effects by modulating the abnormal FC of the amygdala and pain networks, possibly having the same central mechanism as auricular acupuncture.

1. Introduction

Migraine without aura (MwoA), the most common type of migraine, is the second-largest neurological disorder affecting the global disability-adjusted lifespan year, causing a severe burden on the health system and budgets [1]. However, its conventional medical treatments for migraines are far from satisfactory [2]. It is essential to find more effective and safe treatments.

A recent study [3] suggested that the occurrence of migraine was related to the imbalance of the autonomic nervous system, and increasing parasympathetic (mainly including vagal) nerve activity could alleviate the symptoms of migraine [4]. However, there are only a few indirect ways to regulate the vagal nerve tension, such as breathing regulation and yoga [5]. It is worth noting that noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) can directly regulate vagal nerve activity to treat migraines effectively [6, 7]. It has been approved for treating episodic migraines by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of the USA in 2017, reducing the severity and frequency of headache [8, 9], improving the quality of life and reducing the cost of treatment [10], and being well-tolerated [11]. Notably, transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS), a kind of simpler and effective nVNS [12], may have the same treatment effect and mechanism as auricular acupuncture [13]. A growing body of evidence suggests that both auricular acupuncture and taVNS can induce antinociception and relieve symptoms of migraine. However, the instant effects and central mechanism of electrical stimulation at auricular points innervated by the vagal nerve in MwoA are still unclear.

Previous neuroimaging evidences [14–17] suggested that migraine was associated with abnormal structure and function of brain regions involved in pain and emotional processing, such as the prefrontal cortex (PFC), cingulate gyrus, supplementary motor area (SMA), amygdala, hippocampus, insula, precuneus, periaqueductal gray matter (PAG), thalamus, cerebellum, and et al. Among them, the vital functions of the amygdalae in migraine have already attracted many researchers’ attentions [18, 19]. Recent studies [20–22] demonstrated that the amygdalae were also involved in pain processing and modulation. A neuroimaging study found that the amygdala was activated during the headache, and its decreased volume was related to the frequency of headache attacks [23]. The FC of the left amygdala and left middle cingulate gyrus increased in episodic migraine compared with healthy controls, and there were obvious differences between the left amygdala and the right amygdala [24]. These results suggested that the dysfunction of the amygdala might be a potential mechanism of MwoA. However, little has known about the FC of the bilateral amygdalae and other regions in MwoA patients before and during taVNS so far.

Based on the above argument, we hypothesized that continuous taVNS at auricular points could modulate the abnormal FC of the left/right amygdala in MwoA patients. Then, the voxel-wise FC was analyzed during continuous stimulation, using the left/right amygdala as seeds, respectively.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

Thirty episodic migraineurs without aura were recruited for the single-blind, crossover functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study from the neurology clinic outpatient of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine from January to December in 2018. Each participant attended two fMRI scan sessions during the eight-minute continuous stimulation at auricular points separated by seven days, one for taVNS and another for sham-taVNS in random order. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. This study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine.

Similar to our previous study [25], the diagnosis of migraine was based on the International Classification of Headache Disorders 2^nd Edition (ICHD-II) [21, 26], as diagnosed by a specialist working at the neurology outpatient service.

The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) aged 18-45 years old, (2) right-handed, (3) at least six months of migraine duration, (4) having at least one attack per month, (5) having no prophylactic headache medicine during the past one month, and (6) having no psychoactive or vasoactive drugs during the past three months.

The participants were excluded if any of the following criteria were met: (1) was caused by other diseases or special types of migraine, (2) attacked within 48 hours before and during the scan, (3) had pregnancy or lactation, (4) had severe head deformity or intracranial lesions, (5) had other chronic pain diseases, and (6) had the standard score of self-rating anxiety or depression scale greater than 50.

2.2. Intervention Program

2.2.1. Stimulator

Huatuo auricular vagus nerve stimulators were from SDZ-II, Suzhou Medical Appliance Factory, China.

2.2.2. Stimulation Parameters

The stimulation parameters are as follows: constant voltage, continuous wave, 1 Hz, 0.2 ms, and the current intensity below the pain threshold, lasting 8 minutes. taVNS points: CO11 and CO14, left cymba concha (abundant in vagal afferent fibers). StaVNS points: SF2 and SF4-5, left scapha (no vagal afferent fibers) (Figure 1) [25, 27].

2.3. Clinical Assessments

The demographic information and clinical scale data of all patients were collected, including Migraine Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (MSQ), Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS), Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the frequency, and total duration time of migraine attacks during the past four weeks preceding the fMRI scans.

2.4. MRI Data Acquisition

All MRI scans were conducted on a 3.0T Siemens MRI scanner (Siemens MAGNETOM Verio 3.0T, Erlangen, Germany) with a 24-channel phased-array head coil. All subjects were told to stay awake and remained motionless during the scan, keeping their eyes closed. Each scan session lasted approximately 20 minutes. The orders of MRI scans were as follows: a high-resolution anatomical image (MPRAGE), an eight-minute resting-state functional MRI, and an eight-minute continuous real or sham-taVNS (fMRI was applied during this continuous stimulation period).

T1-weighted MPRAGE was applied with the following parameters: ms, ms, mm, °, , mm, and 176 slices. The eight-minute resting state and eight-minute continuous real or sham-taVNS fMRI scan were acquired with the following parameters: ms, ms, mm, °, matrix = , mm, 31 slices, and 240 time points.

2.5. fMRI Data Analysis

2.5.1. fMRI Data Preprocessing

The fMRI data preprocessing was performed using DPABI 3.0 and SPM 12.0 based on MATLAB (The MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA). After removing the first ten volumes of each participant, the functional images were corrected for the intravolume acquisition time delay using slice timing and realignment. One of the participants was excluded based on the criteria of mm or ° in any direction. Then, all corrected functional data were normalized to the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space and resampled to a 3 mm isotropic resolution. The resulting images were further temporally band-pass filtered (0.01–0.08 Hz) to remove the effects of low-frequency drift and high-frequency physiological noise. Finally, 24 head-motion parameters, white matter signals, and cerebrospinal fluid signals were regressed using a general linear model, and linear trends were removed from the fMRI data. Spatial smoothing was also performed before the functional connection analysis using a Gaussian filter (6 mm full-width half maximum; full width at half maximum [FWHM]).

2.5.2. Seed-to-Voxel FC Analysis

The seeds of the left amygdala and right amygdala were defined separately, using the AAL template (Figure 2) (same to the previous literature [24]). Then, the amygdalae were resliced with the brain mask template with size. The FC calculation was performed in DPABI (V3.0). The averaged time courses of the left/right amygdala were extracted, respectively. Next, Pearson correlation was used to calculate the FC between the extracted time courses and the time courses of the whole brain in a voxel-wise manner, respectively. The correlation coefficient map was then converted into a Fisher-Z map by Fisher’s -to- transformation to improve normality.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The intergroup analysis (taVNS vs. staVNS) of the FC was performed using a paired -test, with the mean head-motion value (mean FD Jenkinson) as covariate variables. A threshold of voxel-wise uncorrected and cluster-level corrected by familywise error corrected (FWE) were applied for multiple comparison correction. If voxel-wise and cluster-level , the difference was statistically significant.

Besides, in the baseline resting state and continuous stimulation state, we, respectively, extracted the average values of significantly altered clusters of the left/right amygdala (taVNS vs. staVNS). Then, the differences of the FC values were compared using a paired -test between taVNS and staVNS in the two states, and was considered to be statistically significant [28]. We also explored the association between the initial clinical assessments and the altered FC values (taVNS minus staVNS) in continuous stimulation state across all subjects after Bonferroni correction.

3. Results

3.1. Clinical Results

Twenty-seven patients completed the study and were included in the data analysis, because the two participants did not finish the fMRI scan, and one was excluded for mm or ° in any direction. The demographics are shown in Table 1.

3.2. fMRI Results

3.2.1. Left Amygdala as Seed

The brain regions with decreased FC of the left amygdala mainly located in the left middle frontal gyrus (MFG), left dorsolateral superior frontal gyrus (SFG), right supplementary motor area (SMA), and bilateral paracentral lobule during continuous stimulation of taVNS compared with sham-taVNS (Table 2 and Figure 3(a)). No significant increased FC was observed.

Figure 3

The functional connectivity (FC) of the left amygdala in MwoA during continuous stimulation (taVNS vs. staVNS). L: left; R: right; P: posterior; A: anterior; SAG: sagittal; COR: coronal; TRA: transverse; PCC: postcingulum gyrus; SMA: supplementary motor area; FWE: familywise error correction. Compared with sham-taVNS, the FC significantly decreased between the left amygdala and left frontal middle gyrus, left frontal superior gyrus, right SMA, bilateral paracentral lobule ((a) FWE multiple comparison correction, voxel-level and cluster-level ), bilateral PCC, and right frontal superior medial gyrus ((b) small-volume correction, FWE ) in taVNS.

Since the postcingulum cortex (PCC) and frontal medial gyrus are important nodes in the default mode network (DMN) [29, 30] and endogenous pain-inhibitory circuits [31, 32]. They play a very important role in the migraine pathogenesis [29–32]. Similar to the previous study [33], the small volume correction with a threshold of voxel-wise and cluster-level was used in ROI analysis. The direct intergroup comparison revealed more decreased FC in taVNS compared with the sham, in the bilateral PCC and the right frontal superior medial gyrus (small-volume corrected at ) (Table 2 and Figure 3(b)).

During stimulation, there were statistical significances for the FC in left MFG and SFG, right SMA and bilateral paracentral lobule, PCC, and right medial superior frontal gyrus (taVNS vs. staVNS) (, , Figure 4(a); , , Figure 4(b); , , Figure 4(c); , , Figure 4(d)), while there was no significant difference before stimulation (, , Figure 4(a); , , Figure 4(b); , , Figure 4(c); , , Figure 4(d)) (Supplementary table 1). All the changing trend of these FC were opposite between taVNS and staVNS.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 4

The effects on the functional connectivity (FC) of the left amygdala between stimulations and time factors. SMA: supplementary motor area. A paired -test was used. If , the difference was statistically significant. Before stimulation, there was no statistical significance for the FC of (a) the left amygdala and left MFG and SFG, (b) right SMA and paracentral lobule, (c) posterior cingulate cortex, (d) and frontal superior medial gyrus (taVNS versus staVNS). During stimulation, their differences were significant. The intensity of the FC decreased in taVNS and increased in staVNS (prestimulation vs. during stimulation). Therefore, the trend of the changed FC was opposite between taVNS and staVNS.

The FC between the left amygdala and right SMA was correlated with the frequency ( and ) and the total time ( and ) of migraine attacks during the preceding four weeks before treatment (Supplementary table 2 and Figure 5), and there was no significant association for other FCs.

3.2.2. Right Amygdala as Seed

Compared with the staVNS, the FC significantly decreased between the right amygdala and left MFG in continuous taVNS (Table 3 and Figure 6). The value of the FC between the right amygdala and left MFG does not correlate with the migraine attacks.

The FC of the right amygdala and the left middle frontal gyrus had no significant difference before stimulation ( and ), with significant difference during stimulation ( and ) (taVNS vs. staVNS) (Supplementary table 3 and Figure 7). The changing trend of the FC was opposite between taVNS and staVNS.

Figure 7

The functional connectivity (FC) comparisons of the right amygdala in different states and stimulations. A paired -test was used. If , the difference was statistically significant. Before stimulation, there was no statistical significance for the FC of the right amygdala and left middle frontal gyrus (taVNS vs. staVNS), but the difference was significant during stimulation. The FC decreased in taVNS and increased in staVNS (prestimulation vs. during stimulation). Therefore, the changing trend of the FC was opposite between taVNS and staVNS.

4. Discussion

In this trial, we explored the altered FC of the bilateral amygdalae in MwoA during continuous taVNS and staVNS. To summarize, we found that the FCs significantly decreased during taVNS compared with staVNS between the amygdala and DMN (bilateral PCC), prefrontal cortex (PFC: left dorsolateral SFG, left MFG, and right superior medial frontal gyrus), pain matrix (right SMA), and sensorimotor network (bilateral paracentral lobule), with different changes in the FC between the left amygdala and the right amygdala. Moreover, the value of the FC between the left amygdala and right SMA was positively correlated with the frequency and total time of migraine attacks during the preceding four weeks before treatment. Our research suggests that taVNS at auricular points may modulate the function of the limbic system and pain-related networks via adjusting abnormal FC of the amygdalae to treat migraines. We were the first to report the FC of the bilateral amygdalae during continuous taVNS at acupoints and staVNS in MwoA.

The amygdala played a crucial role in the pathogenesis, chronicity, and recurrence of migraines [24, 34], not only in emotion modulation but also in pain processing. Firstly, animal experiments have proved that the amygdala played an essential role in the regulation of synaptic transmission of neurons related to cortical spreading depression (CSD) and the neuropathic pain in migraine [35]. Secondly, migraine patients are often accompanied by negative emotions such as aversion, anxiety, fear, and avoiding pain behavior, which are closely related to the function of the amygdala [26, 28]. Finally, there are a large number of fibrous connections and the FC between the amygdala and pain-related brain regions [24] and networks [21]. Therefore, modulating the dysfunctional FC of the amygdala might be a potential treatment mechanism in MwoA. Meanwhile, our recent study demonstrated that taVNS can modulate the resting-state FC between the bilateral LC and left amygdala and certain pain-related brain regions consistent with the vagus nerve central projections [25]. So, exploring the changed FC of the amygdala in the MwoA during continuous stimulation helps us to understand the mechanism and intervention effects of taVNS.

Antinociceptive effects of the taVNS were demonstrated in numerous animal experiments [36, 37] and clinical studies [38–40]. The taVNS may reduce nociception and pain through multiple mechanisms [41, 42], such as adjusting the autonomic nervous system, suppressing pain neurons, affecting the behavioral pain response, and modulating the pain networks. Reducing the sympathetic hyperactivity and increasing the parasympathetic activity may help manage pain via taVNS [43], with its anti-inflammatory effect together [44]. In animal models, VNS could inhibite nociceptive activation of trigeminal cervical neurons [45] and Fos protein expression [46]. In addition, Pena found that the VNS facilitated the extinction of conditioned fear responses by promoting plasticity of the amygdala and infralimbic area [47]. Furthermore, its effects on the pain networks will be discussed in detail below.

The most interesting finding was that taVNS is capable of regulating the endogenous analgesia loop and descending pain inhibitory system. The FCs decreased between the amygdala and SFG, MFG, and superior medial frontal gyrus during continuous taVNS. This is consistent with the observation from our previous block-designed study that taVNS produced widespread fMRI signal decreased in the bilateral SFG, MFG, and medial prefrontal gyrus on MwoA [29]. As we all know, the medial frontal gyrus belongs to the medial prefrontal cortex, a key node of the endogenous analgesia loop, and descending pain inhibitory system [19]. Meanwhile, the SFG and MFG are parts of the prefrontal cortex which is of great importance for pain perception and response [28]. Both the amygdala and prefrontal cortex were essential for the limbic system widely connected with other nervous systems and participated in pain and emotional regulation. Neuroimaging studies [24] have reported that the FCs were damaged in migraine between the limbic system and pain-related brain areas. Some researchers [19] even put forward the neurological dysfunction model of the limbic pain network in migraine, highlighting the importance of the limbic system in the pathological mechanism of migraine. Notably, migraine patients have abnormal increases in FC within and around the limbic system. For example, Wei and colleagues [48] found that the FC of the limbic system (bilateral amygdala and right hippocampus) and left middle occipital gyrus (MOG) significantly increased in MwoA patients compared with healthy controls, and the FC between the left amygdala and MOG was positively correlated with the duration of migraine. Therefore, limbic system dysfunction plays an important role in the occurrence, development, and regulation of migraines. Further study of acupuncture analgesia [49] found that the amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF) in left insula decreased in patients with chronic low back pain after acupuncture, and the decrease of average ALFF was positively related to the decrease of VAS value, which confirms that regulating the function of limbic system may be one of the mechanisms for endogenous analgesia. The taVNS could regulate amygdala activity from a recent study [50] and caused extensive negative activation in the limbic system [30]. Therefore, we speculated that taVNS may modulate the function of the limbic system through the amygdalae, regulating the pain networks, and exerting an analgesic effect.

Another important finding was that DMN is crucial to migraine and can be affected by taVNS. The FC decreased between the left amygdala and bilateral PCC after taVNS compared with staVNS in our current trial. Similarly, we found that taVNS decreased the fMRI signal in the bilateral PCC on MwoA in our previous block-designed study [29]. It is noteworthy that PCC is one core area of DMN closely related to pain perception response [31] and inhibition [51]. Neuroimaging studies [52] have found that headache was associated with a reduced volume of the mPFC. Husoy et al. [24] also found the FC of the left amygdala and DMN increased in MwoA, and the increased FC was associated with the development of headaches. More and more studies confirmed that abnormal FC between the limbic system and DMN was related to pain, so regulating their FC could alleviate pain, which is supported by the results of analgesic treatment research. Zou [53] suggested acupuncture could reduce the FC within DMN to a healthy control level in chronic migraine patients, and the FC between DMN and limbic system also decreased in chronic pain patients after cognitive behavioral therapy [54]. Furthermore, Fang [55] found that compared with staVNS, the FC decreased between the DMN and limbic system after one-month taVNS, suggesting that taVNS can regulate the FC between the limbic system and DMN. Hence, taVNS is a valuable choice for pain treatment.

Last but not least, taVNS can modulate the pain matrix. Our result indicated that the FC between the left amygdala and right SMA decreased after taVNS. It is generally accepted that the SMA contributes to the pain matrix. Imaging studies [56] found that there were functional connections between the amygdala and SMA, indicating that the function of the pain matrix was related to the amygdala. The pain matrix and limbic system had high regional homogeneity (ReHo) [57] in pain. Solstrand [58] indicated that the resting-state FC (rsFC) of SMA and the amygdala increased in migraine patients, and the increased rsFC was negatively correlated with migraine frequency, which revealed that the pain matrix and limbic system worked together in pain perception and regulation, and their increased functional activities were closely related to pain. Fortunately, the abnormally increased functional activity of the amygdala and the pain matrix can be reversed by interventions. For example, Shi [57] found extensive negative activation of brain regions of the limbic system and the pain matrix after acupuncture. It is worth noting that the FC between the amygdala and pain matrix decreased after taVNS in our study. Therefore, taVNS can adjust the abnormal FC between the limbic system and the pain matrix in MwoA patients.

However, there are some limitations in our research. Firstly, we only studied the instant effects of taVNS; thus, more studies are needed to evaluate the long-term impact of taVNS. Secondly, although crossover-control design can save the sample size and eliminate the influence of the differences between individuals, it increased the false-positive rate of the experiment, and randomized controlled studies will be considered. Thirdly, we just explored the altered FC using the seed-to-voxel analysis (same to the published article [24]) during taVNS compared with sham-taVNS. It is a very good idea and very important to explore the effects of taVNS on the pain matrix using the ROI-to-ROI analysis in the follow-up study. Finally, the outcome of this small sample study maybe not enough to be extended to the public, so larger samples are needed in the future.

5. Conclusions

From the above discussion, we can conclude that continuous taVNS at auricular points can modulate the FC between the bilateral amygdalae and pain-related regions in MwoA, involving the limbic system, DMN, and pain matrix, with obvious differences between the left amygdala and the right amygdala. The taVNS may produce treatment effects by modulating the abnormal FC of the amygdala and pain networks, possibly having the same central mechanism as auricular acupuncture.

Data Availability

The data (fMRI) used to support the findings of this study are included within the article and the supplementary information files.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contributions

Experimental design was done by Bo Liu, Yue Zhang, and Xian Liu. Yue Zhang, Wenting Luo, Hui Li, Zhaoxian Yan, and Weicui Chen contributed to the data collection. Data analysis was done by Yue Zhang, Wenting Luo, and Xiaoyan Hou. Wenting Luo, Bo Liu, and Yue Zhang contributed to the manuscript preparation. All authors have approved the final manuscript. Wenting Luo and Yue Zhang are co-first authors.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Medical Scientific Research Foundation of Guangdong Province of China (A2017234) and the Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Guangdong Province of China (20182047).

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Table 1: the functional connectivity comparisons of the left amygdala in different states and stimulations. Supplementary Table 2: correlations of the functional connectivity and clinical data. Supplementary Table 3: the functional connectivity comparisons of the right amygdala in different states and stimulations. (Supplementary Materials)

References

GBD 2016 Neurology Collaborators, “Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016,” Lancet Neurology, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 459–480, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. J. Goadsby, “Bench to bedside advances in the 21st century for primary headache disorders: migraine treatments for migraine patients,” Brain, vol. 139, no. 10, pp. 2571–2577, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Grassini and S. Nordin, “Comorbidity in migraine with functional somatic syndromes, psychiatric disorders and inflammatory diseases: a matter of central sensitization?” Behavioral Medicine, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 91–99, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. S. Vasudha, N. K. Manjunath, and H. R. Nagendra, “Changes in MIDAS, perceived stress, frontalis muscle activity and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs usage in patients with migraine headache without aura following ayurveda and yoga compared to controls: an open labeled non-randomized study,” Annals of Neurosciences, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 250–260, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Toschi-Dias, E. Tobaldini, M. Solbiati et al., “Sudarshan Kriya Yoga improves cardiac autonomic control in patients with anxiety-depression disorders,” Journal of Affective Disorders, vol. 214, pp. 74–80, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. L. Hawkins, L. E. Cornelison, B. A. Blankenship, and P. L. Durham, “Vagus nerve stimulation inhibits trigeminal nociception in a rodent model of episodic migraine,” Pain Reports, vol. 2, no. 6, article e628, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Tobaldini, E. Toschi-Dias, L. A. de Souza et al., “Cardiac and peripheral autonomic responses to orthostatic stress during transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation in healthy subjects,” Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 8, no. 4, p. 496, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. R. Chaudhry, I. S. Lendvai, S. Muhammad et al., “Inter-ictal assay of peripheral circulating inflammatory mediators in migraine patients under adjunctive cervical non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS): a proof-of-concept study,” Brain Stimulation, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 643–651, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Martelletti, on Behalf of the PRESTO Study Group, P. Barbanti et al., “Consistent effects of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) for the acute treatment of migraine: additional findings from the randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind PRESTO trial,” The Journal of Headache and Pain, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 101, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Mwamburi, E. J. Liebler, and A. T. Tenaglia, “Review of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (gammaCore): efficacy, safety, potential impact on comorbidities, and economic burden for episodic and chronic cluster headache,” The American Journal of Managed Care, vol. 23, 17 Supplement, pp. S317–S325, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
T. M. Kinfe, B. Pintea, S. Muhammad et al., “Cervical non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) for preventive and acute treatment of episodic and chronic migraine and migraine-associated sleep disturbance: preliminary findings from a prospective observational cohort study,” The Journal of Headache and Pain, vol. 16, no. 1, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. M. Hamer and S. Bauer, “Lessons learned from transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS),” Epilepsy Research, vol. 153, pp. 83-84, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Usichenko, H. Hacker, and M. Lotze, “Transcutaneous auricular vagal nerve stimulation (taVNS) might be a mechanism behind the analgesic effects of auricular acupuncture,” Brain Stimulation, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 1042–1044, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. M. Ellingson, C. Hesterman, M. Johnston, N. R. Dudeck, A. C. Charles, and J. P. Villablanca, “Advanced imaging in the evaluation of migraine headaches,” Neuroimaging Clinics of North America, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 301–324, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. J. Lee, B. Y. Park, S. Cho, S. T. Kim, H. Park, and C. S. Chung, “Increased connectivity of pain matrix in chronic migraine: a resting-state functional MRI study,” The Journal of Headache and Pain, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 29, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Chen, X. Chen, M. Liu et al., “Altered functional connectivity of the marginal division in migraine: a resting-state fMRI study,” The Journal of Headache and Pain, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 89, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. M. Androulakis, K. A. Krebs, C. Jenkins et al., “Central executive and default mode network Intra-network functional connectivity patterns in chronic migraine,” Journal of Neurological Disorders, vol. 6, no. 5, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Hadjikhani, N. Ward, J. Boshyan et al., “The missing link: enhanced functional connectivity between amygdala and visceroceptive cortex in migraine,” Cephalalgia, vol. 33, no. 15, pp. 1264–1268, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Maizels, S. Aurora, and M. Heinricher, “Beyond neurovascular: migraine as a dysfunctional neurolimbic pain network,” Headache, vol. 52, no. 10, pp. 1553–1565, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Dehbandi, E. J. Speckmann, H. C. Pape, and A. Gorji, “Cortical spreading depression modulates synaptic transmission of the rat lateral amygdala,” The European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 2057–2065, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Mainero, J. Boshyan, and N. Hadjikhani, “Altered functional magnetic resonance imaging resting-state connectivity in periaqueductal gray networks in migraine,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 838–845, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Akcali, A. Sayin, Y. Sara, and H. Bolay, “Does single cortical spreading depression elicit pain behaviour in freely moving rats?” Cephalalgia, vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 1195–1206, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Jia and S. Yu, “Grey matter alterations in migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” NeuroImage: Clinical, vol. 14, pp. 130–140, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. K. Husøy, C. Pintzka, L. Eikenes et al., “Volume and shape of subcortical grey matter structures related to headache: a cross-sectional population-based imaging study in the Nord-Trøndelag health study,” Cephalalgia, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 173–184, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zhang, J. Liu, H. Li et al., “Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation at 1 Hz modulates locus coeruleus activity and resting state functional connectivity in patients with migraine: an fMRI study,” NeuroImage: Clinical, vol. 24, p. 101971, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Headache Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society, “The international classification of headache disorders,” Cephalalgia, vol. 24, Supplement 1, pp. 9–160, 2nd edition, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
P. J. Rong, J. L. Fang, L. P. Wang et al., “Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation for the treatment of depression: a study protocol for a double blinded randomized clinical trial,” BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 12, p. 255, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Tu, J. Fang, J. Cao et al., “A distinct biomarker of continuous transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation treatment in major depressive disorder,” Brain Stimulation, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 501–508, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. W. Badran, L. T. Dowdle, O. J. Mithoefer et al., “Neurophysiologic effects of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) via electrical stimulation of the tragus: a concurrent taVNS/fMRI study and review,” Brain Stimulation, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 492–500, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. L. Loggia, R. R. Edwards, J. Kim et al., “Disentangling linear and nonlinear brain responses to evoked deep tissue pain,” Pain, vol. 153, no. 10, pp. 2140–2151, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. A. Vogt, S. Derbyshire, and A. K. P. Jones, “Pain processing in four regions of human cingulate cortex localized with co-registered PET and MR imaging,” The European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 1461–1473, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Argaman, L. B. Kisler, Y. Granovsky et al., “The endogenous analgesia signature in the resting brain of healthy adults and migraineurs,” The Journal of Pain, vol. 21, no. 7-8, pp. 905–918, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Fang, N. Egorova, P. Rong et al., “Early cortical biomarkers of longitudinal transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation treatment success in depression,” Neuroimage Clinical, vol. 14, pp. 105–111, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Garcia-Larrea and R. Peyron, “Pain matrices and neuropathic pain matrices: a review,” Pain, vol. 154, Suppl 1, pp. S29–S43, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Chen, X. Chen, M. Liu, Z. Dong, L. Ma, and S. Yu, “Altered functional connectivity of amygdala underlying the neuromechanism of migraine pathogenesis,” The Journal of Headache and Pain, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 7, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Babygirija, M. Sood, P. Kannampalli, J. N. Sengupta, and A. Miranda, “Percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulation modulates central pain pathways and attenuates post-inflammatory visceral and somatic hyperalgesia in rats,” Neuroscience, vol. 356, pp. 11–21, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S.-P. Chen, I. Ay, A. L. de Morais et al., “Vagus nerve stimulation inhibits cortical spreading depression,” Pain, vol. 157, no. 4, pp. 797–805, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Laqua, B. Leutzow, M. Wendt, and T. Usichenko, “Transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation may elicit anti- and pro-nociceptive effects under experimentally-induced pain - a crossover placebo-controlled investigation,” Autonomic Neuroscience, vol. 185, pp. 120–122, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Straube, J. Ellrich, O. Eren, B. Blum, and R. Ruscheweyh, “Treatment of chronic migraine with transcutaneous stimulation of the auricular branch of the vagal nerve (auricular t-VNS): a randomized, monocentric clinical trial,” The Journal of Headache and Pain, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 543, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. G. Garcia, R. L. Lin, J. Lee et al., “Modulation of brainstem activity and connectivity by respiratory-gated auricular vagal afferent nerve stimulation in migraine patients,” Pain, vol. 158, no. 8, pp. 1461–1472, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Yuan and S. D. Silberstein, “Vagus nerve and vagus nerve stimulation, a comprehensive review: part III,” Headache, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 479–490, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Kaniusas, S. Kampusch, M. Tittgemeyer et al., “Current directions in the auricular vagus nerve stimulation I - a physiological perspective,” Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 13, p. 854, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. Deuchars, V. K. Lall, J. Clancy et al., “Mechanisms underpinning sympathetic nervous activity and its modulation using transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation,” Experimental Physiology, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 326–331, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Bonaz, V. Sinniger, and S. Pellissier, “Anti-inflammatory properties of the vagus nerve: potential therapeutic implications of vagus nerve stimulation,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 594, no. 20, pp. 5781–5790, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Akerman, B. Simon, and M. Romero-Reyes, “Vagus nerve stimulation suppresses acute noxious activation of trigeminocervical neurons in animal models of primary headache,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 102, pp. 96–104, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Bohotin, M. Scholsem, V. Bohotin, R. Franzen, and J. Schoenen, “Vagus nerve stimulation attenuates heat- and formalin-induced pain in rats,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 351, no. 2, pp. 79–82, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. F. Peña, J. E. Childs, S. Willett, A. Vital, C. K. McIntyre, and S. Kroener, “Vagus nerve stimulation enhances extinction of conditioned fear and modulates plasticity in the pathway from the ventromedial prefrontal cortex to the amygdala,” Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, vol. 8, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H.-L. Wei, J. Chen, Y.-C. Chen et al., “Impaired functional connectivity of limbic system in migraine without aura,” Brain Imaging and Behavior, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 1805–1814, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Xiang, Y. Yu, X. Jia et al., “The low-frequency BOLD signal oscillation response in the insular associated to immediate analgesia of ankle acupuncture in patients with chronic low back pain,” Journal of Pain Research, vol. Volume 12, pp. 841–850, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Liu, J. Fang, Z. Wang et al., “Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation modulates amygdala functional connectivity in patients with depression,” Journal of Affective Disorders, vol. 205, pp. 319–326, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Morrison, M. V. Peelen, and P. E. Downing, “The sight of others’ pain modulates motor processing in human cingulate cortex,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 2214–2222, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Soheili-Nezhad, A. Sedghi, F. Schweser et al., “Structural and functional reorganization of the brain in migraine without aura,” Frontiers in Neurology, vol. 10, p. 442, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zou, W. Tang, X. Li, M. Xu, and J. Li, “Acupuncture reversible effects on altered default mode network of chronic migraine accompanied with clinical symptom relief,” Neural Plasticity, vol. 2019, Article ID 5047463, 10 pages, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Shpaner, C. Kelly, G. Lieberman et al., “Unlearning chronic pain: a randomized controlled trial to investigate changes in intrinsic brain connectivity following cognitive behavioral therapy,” NeuroImage: Clinical, vol. 5, pp. 365–376, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Fang, P. Rong, Y. Hong et al., “Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation modulates default mode network in major depressive disorder,” Biological Psychiatry, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 266–273, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Toschi, A. Duggento, and L. Passamonti, “Functional connectivity in amygdalar-sensory/(pre)motor networks at rest: new evidence from the human connectome project,” The European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 1224–1229, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Shi, Z. Liu, S. Zhang et al., “Brain network response to acupuncture stimuli in experimental acute low back pain: an fMRI study,” Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2015, Article ID 210120, 13 pages, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. S. Dahlberg, C. N. Linnman, D. Lee, R. Burstein, L. Becerra, and D. Borsook, “Responsivity of periaqueductal gray connectivity is related to headache frequency in episodic migraine,” Frontiers in Neurology, vol. 9, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2020 Wenting Luo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1702

Downloads

1214

Citations