Obstetrics and Gynecology International

Obstetrics and Gynecology International / 2012 / Article
Special Issue


View this Special Issue

Clinical Study | Open Access

Volume 2012 |Article ID 758508 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/758508

Elham Rahmani, Shahnaz Ahmadi, Niloofar Motamed, Hesam_Oddin Maneshi, "Dosage Optimization for Letrozole Treatment in Clomiphene-Resistant Patients with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Prospective Interventional Study", Obstetrics and Gynecology International, vol. 2012, Article ID 758508, 4 pages, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/758508

Dosage Optimization for Letrozole Treatment in Clomiphene-Resistant Patients with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Prospective Interventional Study

Academic Editor: Lakhbir Dhaliwal
Received30 Jul 2011
Revised30 Sep 2011
Accepted11 Oct 2011
Published16 Jan 2012


Objective. Dose adjustment for induction of ovulation is one of the most important problem. Methods. In a prospective interventional study, 44 clomiphene-resistant infertile patients (113 cycles) were selected from the Abolfazl Infertility Clinic of Bushehr University of Medical Sciences. Letrozole was given orally in a dose of 2.5 mg, 5 mg, and 7.5 mg, respectively. If the patient displayed no response, the dosage was increased. Results. In this patients ovulation occurred in 50 cycles (44.24%), clinical pregnancy rate according to number of cycles was 23.89% (27 of 113 cycles) and according to the number of patients was 61.36% (27 of 44 patients). In the 2.5, 5, and 7.5 groups, follicles occurred in 22.9%, 42.1%, and 85.18% of cycles, and pregnancy rate was 14.58%, 28.94% and, 33.33%, respectively. Conclusions. It is better to administer Letrozole at a lower dosage to prevent complications and increase the dose based on sonographic results antral follicular count, anti-Müllerian hormone, LH/FSH, and estradiol.

1. Introduction

Letrozole is an effective treatment for anovulatory infertile women. Letrozole appears not to have any adverse effects on the endometrium which is frequently associated with clomiphene citrate during ovulation induction [1, 2]. Many researchers have tried letrozole for ovulation induction in different methods [39]. Letrozole induced fewer mature follicles that can decrease multiple-pregnancy rate and risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Therefore, the letrozole as the first-line drug of ovulation-induction agents in polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) patients can be acceptable [10]. Segawa et al. have accepted letrozole and clomiphene to have the same effect in pregnancy outcome in PCOS patients although letrozole is not toxic and does not have any significant congenital anomaly associations [1113]. In this study we have recommended letrozole in serial doses of 2.5, 5, and 7.5 mg in each cycle in clomiphene citrate-resistant infertile women with PCOS. The main interest of this paper is the assessment of efficacy and complication of letrozole in follicular size and number, pregnancy rate, abortion, endometrial thickness, and cumulative pregnancy rates in a clinical trial of clomiphene citrate-resistant patients.

2. Materials and Methods

In this prospective intervention, we studied Abolfazle Clinic’s outpatients of the Bushehr University of Medical Sciences in Iran who referred between January 1, 2008, and December 30, 2010. The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee of the Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, and all patients were required to provide written informed consent before the study commenced. Inclusion criteria are as follows. The study group consisted of polycystic ovarian syndrom (PCOS) patients diagnosed according to the Rotterdam criteria [1]. We defined clomiphene citrate (Clomid, Iran Hormone, Tehran, Iran) resistance as failure to achieve adequate follicular maturation after consumption of 3 cycles of cc at 150 mg/day, determined by serial estradiol monitoring and sonography [1]. Patients resistant to clomiphene citrate became candidates for letrozole (Femara, Novartis, QC, Canada) consumption at the step-up of the protocol. Patients information was recorded in Table 1. Exclusion criteria were abnormal thyroid function test, hyperprolactinoma, galactorrhea, male-factor infertility, tubal and uterine causes of infertility (hysterosalpingography), abnormal response in progesterone challenge test which implies no endogenous estrogen production, , poor patient compliance or complications with treatment. The required information was gathered through demographic and infertility interviews using an information list. Each patient was followed for 6 sessions. Estradiol levels (E2) were measured using the ELISA method by RAYTO set and DIAPLUS kit before the administration of HCG. Serial sonography (Hoda 4000, Japan) was conducted from the 10th day of menstruation and depended on follicular size (18–24 mm) from which HCG (human chorionic gonadotropin, Pregnyl, Organon, Oss, The Netherlands) was administered. There were 3 steps in which we prescribed letrozole. In all cases, daily administration began on the 3rd day of the menstrual cycle through to the 7th day (totalling 5 days). In the first step we prescribed letrozole at a dose of 2.5 mg (one tablet). Normal follicular size and endometrial thickness were considered 18–24 mm and 6 mm or more, respectively, [1]. If the follicle was deemed not acceptable, the dose of letrozole was increased at the next cycle. At the second and third steps we prescribed letrozole at a dose of 5 mg daily and 7.5 mg/day, respectively, and according to patient’s response, repeated the same dose. In the current study we tested the hypothesis that prescribing letrozole as an ovulation induction agent in infertile women would increase pregnancy rate, ovulation, and follicle number. The primary outcome measure was normal follicular size, and the secondary outcome measure was the clinical pregnancy. Clinical pregnancy was considered as the presence of a gestational sac with fetal heart activity. Letrozole tablets were prescribed by an experienced nurse who thoroughly explained the method of use to the patients. Sonography was done by an experienced radiologist. Statistical analysis was performed by the Statistical Package for Social Science version 11.5 for windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The data was analyzed by student’s -test and chi-squared test for linear trend and comparing proportions. A value of <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

CharacteristicsMean ± SDRange

Age (years) 18–39
BMI (kg/m2) 19.3–29.85
Duration of infertility (years) 2–8
Basal FSH (mIU/mL) <10
Basal LH (mIU/mL) <12
Basal Esteradiol (pg/mL) 25–75
Basal TSH (μIU/mL). 0.88–4
Basal prolactin (ng/mL) <24
DHEAS (Ug/dL) 35–430
Testosterone (ng/mL) 0.1–1.8

3. Results

Demographic information was described in Table 1. These 44 patients had received Clomid in 3 sessions (150 mg), and their sonography results did not show any dominant follicle in serial sonography and were known as clomiphene citrate resistant. According to the flow chart (Figure 1), treatment was started. Number of follicles was summarized in Table 2. There was a significant linear relationship between letrozole dosage and follicular number ( for linear trend: 25.6, ), and this trend was significant in each step ( for linear trend: 11.48, ) (Table 2). Complications were presented in Table 3. There was a significant linear trend between Letrozole dosage and its complications ( for linear trend: 6.38, ) (Table 3). Characteristic of letrozole cycle was showed in Table 4.

DosageOne follicleMultifollicles

Letrozole 2.5 mg10 (83.33%)2 (16.66%)
Letrozole 5 mg11 (68.75%)5 (31.25%)
Letrozole 7.5 mg15 (65.21%)8 (34.78%)

for linear trend: 25.6, .

DosageAUBOvarian cyct

Letrozole 2.5 mg2.08%
Letrozole 5 mg2.63%2.63%
Letrozole 7.5 mg14.61%3.7%

for linear trend: 6.38, .

VariableLetrozole groups Mean ± SDLetrozole total cycle

Follicular development (mm) 113
Serum E2 one day of HCG (pg/mL) 113
Pregnancy/cycles27 (23.89%)113
Pregnancy/total patients27 (61.36%)113

4. Discussion

In this study clomiphene citrate-resistant patient had different response to letrozole in a way that 44.24% of the cycles had normal follicles and 23.89% of them resulted in pregnancy. Increasing the dosage can improve the chance of ovulation and pregnancy. Only 7 (15.9%) patients with 2.5 mg letrozole daily became pregnant while 11 patients were pregnant by increasing the dosage to 5 mg, and, among those who did not respond to these dosages, 9 patients became pregnant by increasing it to 7.5 mg. About 61.36% of the patients became pregnant with letrozole although letrozole is more expensive than clomid but cheaper than gonadotropins and so is more cost effective. The metformin-clomiphene citrate combination was seen to increase the ovulatory and pregnancy rate when compared with CC alone. Metformin increased the ovulatory rate in clomiphene citrate failures, also implying increased sensitivity to clomiphene citrate [14]. Akbary-Asbagh et al. and Begum et al. suggest letrozole as an effective treatment for clomiphene citrate-resistant (PCOS) patients [15, 16]. Two of 113 cycles resulted in twins; increasing the dosage improved the chance of two follicles in one cycle. In the first step, like Akbary-Asbagh et al. and Begum et al. study [15, 16], all the cycles had one follicle, but 31.25% and 30.43% of cycles had two follicles in 5 mg and 7.5 mg Letrozole regimen, respectively, even one patient had 3 follicles in a cycle. In Mitwally et al.’s study, for all PCO patients with a serial increase of letrozole dosage (set-up protocol) the same results were confirmed which may be due to the long-term inhibition of estrogen levels (E2) [17]. When a patient responds to clomiphene citrate, the E2 will increase considerably which will be greater than when she receives Letrozole [2, 4]. Because of clomiphene citrate resistance, E2 levels do not increase by clomiphene citrate consumption, and beside ovulation its level will be less than the acceptable level in letrozole groups [6]. Basal testosterone level is a good marker for pregnancy outcome and quantity of dominant follicles on HCG day in women with reduced ovarian reserve but not in women with normal range of serum FSH [18]. Letrozole is an effective ovulation induction drug in elevated-BMI women [19]. We had not any correlation between BMI, basal testosterone, LH/FSH, and number of mature follicle because according to inclusion criteria all of the patients had normal testosterone level, BMI, and LH/FSH ratio. The chance of AUB increased from 2.08% with 2.5 mg letrozole daily to 2.63% with 5 mg daily and 14.8% in the 7.5 mg regimen. No change was found in endometrial thickness according to the Cortines study [6]. So AUB could be due to a decrease in estrogen levels. Given these findings, it is required that more investigations be conducted with estrogen drugs like conjugated estrogens which can prevent AUB in cases with additional letrozole dosage. Letrozole can block estrogen (E) production, consequential in decreased negative feedback of E on pituitary for FSH secretion. Bentov et al., prove that a ratio of cycle day 7 to cycle day 3 postletrozole FSH level >1.5 is related with poor ovarian response. Letrozole challenge test can be a prediction of ovarian response [20]. We suggest that higher pregnancy rates during letrozole treatment can be achieved if antral follicular count, anti-Müllerian hormone, LH/FSH, and estradiol are checked and good patient selection is done [1]. The good pregnancy results and low multiple gestation rate of 2.5 mg letrozole for induction of ovulation is hopeful for letrozole user as a first-line drug [12]. The chances of multigestational pregnancy increases by increasing the number of follicles in a cycle which implies an appropriate response to letrozole. Cumulative pregnancy rates were considerable in clomiphene citrate resistant patients, but the pregnancy rate was not significantly different between the 2.5, 5, and 7.5 mg regimens while complications (multigestational pregnancy risk, irregular bleeding, and ovarian cyst) increased by dosage. Delivery rate was 25 live birth/cycles (22.12%) due to 2 abortions during the study.

5. Conclusion

Finally it is concluded that in Clomid-resistant patients, it is better to start letrozole with the lower dosage to prevent more complications and increase dosage based on the sonographic results, antral follicular count, anti-Müllerian hormone, LH/FSH, and estradiol.


The authors are grateful to the Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, the Management of Research Affairs, that approved the proposal, and this data was collected from Mr. Maneshi’s thesis.


  1. J. Brown, C. Farquhar, J. Beck, C. Boothroyd, and E. Hughes, “Clomiphene and anti-oestrogens for ovulation induction in PCOS,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 4, Article ID CD002249, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. M. F. M. Mitwally and R. F. Casper, “Use of an aromatase inhibitor for induction of ovulation in patients with an inadequate response to clomiphene citrate,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 305–309, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. A. Requena, J. Herrero, J. Landeras et al., “Use of letrozole in assisted reproduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 571–582, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. M. R. Begum and A. Begum, “Letrozole vs clomiphene citrate in induction of ovulation in polycystic ovarian disease (PCOD),” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 86, no. 3, supplement, S408 pages, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  5. M. F. M. Mitwally and R. F. Casper, “Single-dose administration of an aromatase inhibitor for ovarian stimulation,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 229–231, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. A. Cortinez, I. De Carvalho, D. Vantman, F. Gabler, G. Iniguez, and M. Vega, “Hormonal profile and endometrial morphology in letrozole-controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in ovulatory infertile patients,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 110–115, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. H. Holzer, R. Casper, and T. Tulandi, “A new era in ovulation induction,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 277–284, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. H. Al-Fozan, M. Al-Khadouri, S. L. Tan, and T. Tulandi, “A randomized trial of letrozole versus clomiphene citrate in women undergoing superovulation,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 82, no. 6, pp. 1561–1563, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. T. Tulandi and A. H. DeCherney, “Limiting access to letrozole-is it justified?” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 779–780, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. U. Bayar, M. Basaran, S. Kiran, A. Coskun, and S. Gezer, “Use of an aromatase inhibitor in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: a prospective randomized trial,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 86, no. 5, pp. 1447–1451, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. T. Segawa, K. Shinohara, O. Miyauchi, S. Kawachiya, Y. Takehara, and O. Kato, “Comparison of pregnancy outcome in PCOS patients after infertility treatment with letrozole or clomiphene citrate,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 90, supplement, p. S484, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  12. M. F. Mitwally, M. M. Biljan, and R. F. Casper, “Pregnancy outcome after the use of an aromatase inhibitor for ovarian stimulation,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 192, no. 2, pp. 381–386, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. T. Tulandi, J. Martin, R. Al-Fadhli et al., “Congenital malformations among 911 newborns conceived after infertility treatment with letrozole or clomiphene citrate,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 1761–1765, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. P. Dasari and G. Pranahita, “The efficacy of metformin and clomiphene citrate combination compared with clomiphene citrate alone for ovulation induction in infertile patients with PCOS,” Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 18–22, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. F. Akbary-Asbagh, Z. Heidar, F. Frozan-Fard et al., “Evaluation of letrozole therapeutic effect in infertile women,” Acta Medica Iranica, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 199–203, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  16. M. R. Begum, E. Quadir, A. Begum, R. A. Begum, and M. Begum, “Role of aromatase inhibitor in ovulation induction in patients with poor response to clomiphene citrate,” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 502–506, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. M. F. Mitwally, T. Said, A. Galal et al., “Letrozole step-up protocol: a successful superovulation protocol,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 89, no. 4, supplement, pp. S23–S24, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  18. Y. Qin, Z. Zhao, M. Sun, L. Geng, L. Che, and Z. J. Chen, “Association of basal serum testosterone levels with ovarian response and in vitro fertilization outcome,” Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, vol. 9, article 9, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. K. K. McKnight, J. L. Nodler, J. J. Cooper Jr., V. R. Chapman, S. P. Cliver, and G. W. Bates Jr., “Body mass index-associated differences in response to ovulation induction with Letrozole,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 96, no. 5, pp. 1206–1208, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. Y. Bentov, E. Burstein, N. Esfandiari, and R. F. Casper, “Use of letrozole challenge test to adjust gonadotropin dose in non-down-regulated cycles,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 95, no. 8, pp. 2492–2493, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2012 Elham Rahmani et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.