Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity / 2014 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 639531 | 14 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/639531

The Beneficial Effect of Melatonin in Brain Endothelial Cells against Oxygen-Glucose Deprivation Followed by Reperfusion-Induced Injury

Academic Editor: Honglian Shi
Received25 Mar 2014
Revised07 Jun 2014
Accepted20 Jun 2014
Published14 Jul 2014

Abstract

Melatonin has a cellular protective effect in cerebrovascular and neurodegenerative diseases. Protection of brain endothelial cells against hypoxia and oxidative stress is important for treatment of central nervous system (CNS) diseases, since brain endothelial cells constitute the blood brain barrier (BBB). In the present study, we investigated the protective effect of melatonin against oxygen-glucose deprivation, followed by reperfusion- (OGD/R-) induced injury, in bEnd.3 cells. The effect of melatonin was examined by western blot analysis, cell viability assays, measurement of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS), and immunocytochemistry (ICC). Our results showed that treatment with melatonin prevents cell death and degradation of tight junction protein in the setting of OGD/R-induced injury. In response to OGD/R injury of bEnd.3 cells, melatonin activates Akt, which promotes cell survival, and attenuates phosphorylation of JNK, which triggers apoptosis. Thus, melatonin protects bEnd.3 cells against OGD/R-induced injury.

1. Introduction

Stroke is the third most frequent worldwide cause of adult death [1, 2]. Specifically, about 80% of all strokes are ischemic, resulting from arterial occlusion in the brain [1]. Reperfusion after occlusion results in serious brain injury, due to overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS), calcium overload [3, 4], and blood-brain barrier (BBB) injury [5]. Finally, in ischemic stroke, the brain is damaged because of hypoxia and oxidative stress [610]. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) play a key role in the pathogenesis of many diseases, including central nervous system (CNS) diseases [1114]. During ischemic stroke, the excessive generation of ROS leads to inflammation and cell apoptosis [1521] and induces mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling [2224]. c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), one of the MAPKs, is activated by a variety of cell stresses, including hyperosmotic shock, hypoxia, and ROS [25, 26]. JNK plays key roles in apoptosis and inflammation [27, 28]. JNK signaling is activated by inflammatory cytokines and promotes neuronal cell death [29]. Endothelial cells are also damaged by activation of JNK signaling, in response to oxidative stress [30]. Several studies have demonstrated that, in hypoxia and a state of reoxygenation, cells induce apoptotic signaling through JNK and p38 MAPK [31, 32]. The BBB controls the exchange of materials between blood and the brain and plays an important role in the homeostatic regulation of the brain microenvironment [33]. The tight junctions between capillary endothelial cells, which form an essential structural component of the BBB [34], include membrane proteins like occludin [35] and claudins [36, 37]. Several studies have suggested that hypoxia causes alterations of the tight junction proteins Claudin 5, occludin, ZO-1, and ZO-2, which affect BBB permeability [38, 39]. In addition, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is an inducer of vascular leakage [40] and is also known as vascular permeability enhancing factor [41, 42]. During ischemia, VEGF interacts with receptors for VEGF on the ischemic vessels and contributes to disruption of the BBB [43, 44]. Zhang el al. demonstrated that inhibition of VEGF reduces BBB permeability [43]. Melatonin is synthesized in the pineal gland and has been known to function as an antioxidant [45]. Melatonin reduces the cellular toxicity of ROS in ischemia and reperfusion (I/R) brain injury [46]. In an in vivo cerebral ischemia model, several researches have demonstrated that melatonin treatment reduces brain damage in the setting of ischemia or hypoxia-induced injury [47, 48]. In vitro, melatonin protects primary neuronal cells from apoptotic death [49] and enhances survival of human neuroblastoma cells [50] in the setting of oxygen-glucose deprivation- (OGD-) induced injury. Furthermore, melatonin suppresses VEGF expression in cancer cells [51, 52] and inhibits serum VEGF levels in patients [53]. In the present study, we investigate whether melatonin protects brain endothelial cells against oxygen-glucose deprivation followed by reperfusion- (OGD/R-) induced injury. We show that melatonin reduces the generation of ROS, prevents disruption of the BBB by stabilizing expression of tight junction proteins and suppressing VEGF expression, and attenuates phosphorylation of JNK, a mediator of cellular apoptosis. Therefore, our results suggest that melatonin is important in protecting the BBB against cerebral ischemic damage.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cell Culture

Murine brain endothelial cells (bEnd.3 cells; ATCC, VA, USA) were purchased from ATCC and cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Hyclone Laboratories, UT, USA), supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS, Hyclone Laboratories, UT, USA) and 100 units/mL of penicillin/streptomycin (Hyclone Laboratories, UT, USA), at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere in the presence of 5% CO2 [54]. bEND.3 cells were used at 13 passages in this study.

2.2. Oxygen-Glucose Deprivation (OGD) and Reperfusion

Confluent cells were transferred to an anaerobic chamber (Forma Scientific, OH, USA) (O2 tension, 0.1%) and washed three times with PBS. Then, culture medium was replaced with deoxygenated, glucose-free balanced salt solution, and cells were incubated for 6 h. Following oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD) injury, cells were incubated for 18 h under normal growth conditions, with or without drug treatment [55].

2.3. Drug Treatment

Melatonin was purchased from Sigma (Sigma, MO, USA) and dissolved in ethanol. An equivalent volume of ethanol (final: 0.01%) or water was added to control and all melatonin-containing wells. bEnd.3 cells were exposed to 1–100 nM melatonin for 24 h before OGD/R injury. The present study consisted of four groups: (1) normal control (NC), bEnd.3 cells cultured with normal media without OGD injury; (2) experimental control (EC), bEnd.3 cells cultured in nontreated medium for 18 h after 6 h of OGD injury; (3) 10 nM melatonin (Mel 10 nM), bEnd.3 cells treated with 10 nM melatonin for 24 h before 6 h of OGD injury; these cells were then cultured in nontreated medium for 18 h; (4) 100 nM melatonin (Mel 100 nM): bEnd.3 cells were also treated with 100 nM melatonin (100 nM melatonin group) for 24 h before 6 h of OGD injury. These cells were then cultured in nontreated medium for 18 h. In Akt inhibitor groups, we treated 100 nM Akt inhibitor (Sigma, MO, USA) together with melatonin.

2.4. Hoechst 33258 and Propidium Iodide (PI) Staining

Cell viability was evaluated by staining bEnd.3 cells with Hoechst 33258 dye (Sigma, MO, USA) and propidium iodide (PI; Sigma, MO, USA). Hoechst dye was added to the culture medium (2-3 μg/mL) and samples were then incubated at 37.8°C for 30 min. PI solution was then added (2–5 μg/mL) just before cells were observed with a microscope (BX51; Olympus) equipped with epifluorescence and a UV filter block. PI-positive cells were counted as dead cells [56].

2.5. Cell Viability Assay

bEnd.3 cells (2 × 105 cells/mL) were seeded in 98-well plates to monitor all experiment conditions, including pretreatment, OGD injury, and reperfusion. Next, cells were rinsed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and culture medium was replaced with serum-free medium and 100 μL 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyl tetrasodium bromide (MTT) (Sigma, MO, USA) solution (5 mg/mL in PBS) per well. After 1 h of incubation, medium was removed and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was added to solubilize the purple formazan product of MTT treatment. The supernatant from each well was analyzed using an ELISA plate reader (Labsystems Multiskan MCC/340; Fisher Scientific, PA, USA) at a wavelength of 570 nm, with background subtraction at 650 nm. All experiments were repeated at least three times. Cell viability in the control medium, without any treatment, was represented as 100%. Cell viability was reported as a relative value, compared to the control group.

2.6. Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) Assay

Cytotoxicity in all treatment groups was quantified by measuring the amount of LDH released into the culture medium from OGD/R-injured cells [57, 58]. LDH release (cytotoxicity %) was calculated by dividing the value at the experimental time point by the maximum value. The maximum LDH release was measured after freezing each culture at −70°C overnight, followed by rapid thawing, which induced nearly complete cell damage.

2.7. Determination of Intracellular ROS

The level of intracellular ROS in each treatment group was measured using a fluorescent probe, 2′,7′dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFDA; Invitrogen, CA, USA), as previously described [59]. Cells were plated at a density of 1 × 106 cells/mL and treated with melatonin for 24 h. After melatonin pretreatment, OGD injury and reperfusion were conducted. Then, bEND.3 cells were treated with 5 μM DCF-DA for 30 min at 37°C. After washing with PBS, fluorescence was measured with a microscope (Nikon TS100-F ECLIPSE) equipped with a CCD camera (Hamamatsu Photonics) [54].

2.8. Western Blot Analysis

After pretreatment, OGD injury, and restoration, cells were washed rapidly with ice-cold PBS, scraped, and collected. Cell pellets were lysed with ice-cold RIPA buffer (Sigma, MO, USA). The lysates were centrifuged at 13,200 rpm for 1 h at 4°C to produce whole-cell extracts. Protein content was quantified using the BCA method (Pierce, IL, USA). Protein (20 μg) was separated on a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide (PAGE) gel and transferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane. After blocking with 5% bovine serum albumin, prepared in Tris-buffered saline/Tween (TBS-T; 20 nM Tris (pH 7.2); 150 mM NaCl; 0.1% Tween 20), for 1 h at RT, immunoblots were incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies that specifically detect Akt (1 : 2000, Cell Signaling, MA, USA), p-Akt (1 : 2000, Cell Signaling, MA, USA), JNK (1 : 2000, Cell Signaling, MA, USA), p-JNK (1 : 2000, Cell Signaling, MA, USA), Claudin 5 (1 : 1000, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), VEGF (1 : 1000, Millipore, MA, USA), Bax (1 : 2000, Cell Signaling, MA, USA), or β-actin (1 : 2000, Cell Signaling, MA, USA). Next, blots were incubated with HRP-linked anti-mouse and -rabbit IgG antibodies purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA) for 1 h at RT. Enhanced chemiluminescence was performed by ECL (Pierce, IL, USA) [54].

2.9. Immunocytochemistry (ICC)

The expression of VEGF and Claudin 5 in bEnd.3 cells was confirmed by immunocytochemistry. Cells in all experimental groups were washed three times with PBS, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 3 h, and then washed with PBS. bEnd.3 cells were permeabilized with 0.025% Triton X-100 and blocked for 1 h at RT with dilution buffer (Invitrogen, CA, USA). Primary anti-rabbit VEGF (1 : 500, Millipore, MA, USA) and anti-rabbit Claudin 5 (1 : 500, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) antibodies were prepared in dilution buffer, added to samples, and incubated for 3 h at RT. Primary antibody was then removed and cells were washed three times for 3 min each with PBS. Later, samples were incubated with FITC-conjugated goat, anti-rabbit (1 : 200, Jackson Immunoresearch, PA, USA) or Rhodamine-conjugated donkey, or anti-rabbit secondary antibodies (1 : 500, Millipore, MA, USA) for 2 h at RT. Cells were washed again three times for 3 min each with PBS and stained with 1 μg/mL 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (1 : 100, Invitrogen, CA, USA) for 10 min at RT. Fixed samples were imaged using a Zeiss LSM 700 confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss, NY, USA).

2.10. Statistical Analysis

Statistical comparisons were performed using independent t-tests for two groups. SPSS software was used for all analyses. Data were expressed as mean ± S.E.M. of three independent experiments. Differences were considered significant at #, *, and **.

3. Results

3.1. Melatonin Attenuates the Cell Death of bEND.3 Cells after OGD/R-Induced Injury

To confirm the protective effect of melatonin on OGD/R-induced injury, we first conducted an MTT assay to check cell viability in all treatment groups (Figure 1(a)). Cell viability showed that the OGD/R injury exposed group exhibited decreased cell viability, compared to the normal control group (100% cell viability in the normal control group; 39% cell viability in the OGD/R injury exposed group). We checked the cell viability by pretreatment with melatonin 1 nM to 100 nM. Cell viability in 1 nM and 5 nM melatonin pretreatment group was almost not different from the OGD/R injury exposed group. Treatment with 10 nM melatonin also did not change cell viability compared to the OGD/R injury exposed group (48% cell viability in the Mel 10 nM group). However, treatment with 100 nM melatonin obviously increased cell viability after OGD/R-induced injury, compared to the normal control group (62% cell viability in the Mel 100 nM group) (Figure 1(a)). In addition, we evaluated cytotoxicity in bEND.3 cells following OGD/R injury using an LDH assay (Figure 1(b)). Cytotoxicity was 12% in the normal control group but was 28% in the OGD/R injury exposed group. Cytotoxicity in 1 nM and 5 nM melatonin pretreatment group was not largely different from the OGD/R injury exposed group. Treating cells with 10 nM melatonin resulted in 21% cytotoxicity and treating cells with 100 nM melatonin resulted in 18% cytotoxicity (Figure 1(b)). Considering cell viability and cytotoxicity data, we decided two concentrations of melatonin (10 nM melatonin concentration (among the low concentrations: 1 nM, 5 nM, and 10 nM) and 100 nM melatonin concentration (among the high concentrations: 50 nM, 100 nM)) to compare the effect of melatonin easily. We also conducted Hoechst/PI staining to check the dead cells in all groups (Figure 1(c)). Hoechst/PI staining images showed that only melatonin treatment groups were almost not different from the normal control group. PI-positive cells (dead cells) evidently were increased in the OGD/R injury exposed group, compared to the normal control group. 10 nM and 100 nM melatonin treatment promoted cell survival and inhibited cell death against OGD/R-induced injury. In the 100 nM melatonin treatment group, the protective effect of melatonin against OGD/R injury death in bEND.3 cells was more obvious than in the 10 nM melatonin treatment group (Figure 1(c)). Taken together, these findings suggest that melatonin attenuates OGD/R-induced damage in brain endothelial cells.

3.2. Melatonin Decreases OGD/R-Induced ROS Production

We measured ROS levels using DCF-DA reagent, a fluorescent dye that visualizes ROS. DCF-DA-positive cells increased after OGD/R. ROS levels in melatonin pretreatment groups (10 nM, 100 nM melatonin) were not largely different from ROS levels in the normal control group. In the OGD/R injury exposed group, ROS levels were evidently increased compared to the normal control group. This was partially blocked by pretreatment with 10 nM melatonin (Figures 2(a) and 2(b)). 100 nM melatonin pretreatment clearly decreased the number of DCF-DA-positive cells, compared to the OGD/R injury exposed group. This result suggests that melatonin inhibits OGD/R-induced ROS production in brain endothelial cells.

3.3. Melatonin Prevents Degradation of Tight Junction Proteins against OGD/R Injury

To check the protective effect of melatonin on the integrity of tight junctions during OGD/R, we measured the level of Claudin 5, a tight junction protein, by immunocytochemistry (Figure 3(a)) and western blot analysis (Figure 3(b)). OGD/R stress obviously decreased the expression of Claudin 5 in the bEND.3 cells compared to the normal control (NC) group. The expression of Claudin 5 did not nearly change in the 10 nM melatonin treatment group, compared to the experimental control (EC) group which in exposed OGD/R injury. The expression of Claudin 5 was evidently attenuated by treatment with 100 nM melatonin (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)). This result shows that melatonin pretreatment protects degradation of Claudin 5 following OGD/R injury. Namely, melatonin may prevent deterioration of tight junctions in response to OGD/R-induced injury.

3.4. Melatonin Attenuates the Expression of VEGF after OGD/R-Induced Injury

We conducted immunocytochemistry (Figures 4(a) and 4(b)) and western blot analysis (Figure 4(c)) to confirm the expression of VEGF in all treatment groups. This result indicated that the expression of VEGF became considerably elevated after OGD/R injury in the bEND.3 cells. However, the expression of VEGF was reduced by melatonin treatment (both 10 nM and 100 nM melatonin pretreatment) (Figures 4(a) and 4(b)). This finding suggests that melatonin attenuates the expression of VEGF in brain endothelial cells following OGD/R-induced injury.

3.5. Melatonin Protects bEND.3 Cells via Akt Activation and JNK Suppression

To investigate whether Akt signaling was activated in OGD/R-induced stress, we first measured the phosphorylation status of Akt by western blot analysis (Figure 5(a)). Phosphorylation of Akt is associated with activation of Akt signaling and cell survival. Our result suggests that the protein expression of phosphor-Akt/Akt in the EC group is attenuated compared to the NC group. Expression of phosphor-Akt in the 10 nM melatonin treatment group did not nearly change compared to the EC group. However, expression of phosphor-Akt in the 100 nM melatonin treatment group was higher than in the EC group (Figure 5(a)). Next, we also examined the phosphorylation status of JNK by western blot analysis (Figure 5(b)), because the phosphorylation of JNK correlates with activation of apoptosis signaling. The expression of phosphor-JNK was decreased by melatonin treatment after OGD/R-induced injury. Pretreatment with 100 nM melatonin resulted in the obvious inhibition of JNK signaling whereas JNK activation in 10 nM melatonin pretreatment group was not largely different from the EC group (Figure 5(b)). These results suggest that melatonin 100 nM increases Akt activation and suppresses JNK activation. To confirm the relationship between melatonin and Akt signaling, we checked the expression of Bax by western blot analysis (Figure 5(c)). We confirmed that the protein expression of Bax in the bEND.3 cells was increased under OGD/R injury compared to the NC group. Also, 10 nM and 100 nM melatonin treatment reduced the protein expression of Bax under OGD/R injury. When we checked the expression of Bax in OGD/R injured bEND.3 cells with Akt inhibitor and melatonin pretreatment, we confirmed that Akt inhibitor pretreatment did not reduce the expression of Bax in melatonin pretreatment groups (Figure 5(d)). These findings indicate that melatonin may promote Akt signaling and suppress JNK signaling. Specifically, melatonin may attenuate the expression of Bax, known as an apoptotic protein through Akt activation in brain endothelial cells following OGD/R stress.

4. Discussion

Ischemic stroke causes oxidative stress in the brain as well as various neuropathological impairments [60]. BBB disruption is commonly observed in stroke patients [61, 62]. BBB damage is aggravated by reperfusion after ischemia [63]. ROS are generated during cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury and lead to severe brain damage by promoting the cell apoptosis pathway [64, 65]. Also, ROS cause BBB hyperpermeability, brain edema, hemorrhage, and inflammation [66]. In the present study, we induced OGD/R injury, which is known as an appropriate in vitro model of stroke [67, 68], in brain endothelial cells to investigate the effect of ischemia-reperfusion injury. Recent research suggests that antioxidants attenuate oxidative damage induced by ischemia-reperfusion injury by decreasing mechanisms of ROS production [69]. Previous researches have suggested that antioxidants preserve BBB disruption and attenuate ROS generation after cerebral ischemia reperfusion in vivo [7072] and in vitro [73, 74]. Melatonin is known as an antioxidant [75], a powerful free radical scavenger [7678], and the cellular protector against various oxidative stress-associated diseases [79, 80]. Several studies in animals have suggested that melatonin reduces cellular damage by decreasing ROS in ischemia-reperfusion injury [46, 81, 82] and ischemia-hypoxia injury [83]. In the present study, we confirmed that melatonin reduces OGD/R-induced ROS generation in brain endothelial cells and prevents cell death of brain endothelial cells following OGD/R injury. Hypoxia causes degradation of tight junction proteins, such as Claudin 3, ZO-1 and ZO-2, and occludin [38, 39]. Several studies have demonstrated that claudins are major proteins in tight junctions [8487], which are essential structural components of the BBB [34]. And, Claudin 5 is an important molecule that promotes disruption of the BBB in hypoxic conditions [88]. Tao et al. have demonstrated that melatonin prevents degradation of ZO-1, a tight junction protein that protects against ischemic injury in endothelial cells [89]. To determine the protective effect of melatonin on impaired BBB function caused by ischemia reperfusion, we examined Claudin 5 protein expression in brain endothelial cells following OGD/R injury. Our findings suggest that melatonin may prevent BBB disruption during ischemia-reperfusion injury by inhibiting degradation of the Claudin 5 tight junction protein. Hypoxia results in increased paracellular permeability [38, 9092], leading to formation of cerebral edema [93]. Hypoxia induces the expression of VEGF [9497], which is considered as one of the most important factors that stimulates the formation of new blood vessels [94, 95]. VEGF increases the permeability of blood vessels [92, 98, 99] and leads to vasogenic edema [100103]. Several studies have demonstrated that VEGF increases BBB permeability [99], while inhibition of VEGF reduces BBB permeability [43]. Melatonin protects BBB hyperpermeability and reduces brain edema in ischemic stroke [104, 105]. Also, recent research has shown that melatonin reduces expression of VEGF in hypoxic damage [53, 106108]. In the present study, our results showed that melatonin reduced the expression of VEGF in brain endothelial cells following OGD/R-induced injury. In oxidative stress, ROS acts as an important mediator to activate the MAPK pathway [23, 24]. The phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase/protein kinase B (PI3K/Akt) signaling pathway is considered to be one of the cell survival pathways [109]. Many researches have demonstrated that Akt plays a major role in protection from cell death under oxidative stress [110115] and attenuates ROS production, which protects cells [116]. In brain endothelial cells, Akt enhances cell survival and inhibits apoptosis [117119]. Melatonin promotes Akt signaling to protect cells in response to stress [120]. In the present study, our result showed that melatonin enhanced Akt activation following OGD/R injury. This finding may indicate that melatonin protects brain endothelial cells via Akt activation in the setting of ischemia-reperfusion injury. In addition, Akt can protect cellular apoptosis by regulating a proapoptotic protein such as Bax [121124]. Several studies demonstrated that melatonin may regulate the Bax expression and may be involved in the apoptosis signaling [125, 126]. In the present study, our results showed that melatonin may regulate the Bax expression through regulating Akt activation. Considering that Bax is the proapoptotic protein, melatonin may protect the apoptosis of brain endothelial cells through suppressing the expression of Bax in response to hypoxia and reperfusion stress. JNK signaling contributes to cellular apoptosis triggered by various stresses, including oxidized LDL, proinflammatory cytokines, or high glucose [127129]. Specifically, excessive ROS generation is closely linked to JNK activation [130132]. JNK activation triggers the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway [133, 134] and disrupts the BBB [135]. Several studies have shown that JNK inhibitors exert protective effects against ischemic injury in a rodent model [136139]. In the present study, our findings suggest that melatonin attenuates JNK activation in OGD/R-exposed brain endothelial cells. This result indicates that melatonin may inhibit the death of brain endothelial cells via JNK suppression. In conclusion, melatonin protects brain endothelial cells against ischemic-reperfusion injury by reducing the production of ROS, by preserving tight junction proteins, by attenuating expression of VEGF, and by regulating Akt activation and JNK suppression. Hence, this study suggests that melatonin may play as the protector on brain endothelial cells under brain hypoxic injury such as stroke. For application to the patients with stroke, this study has many limitations because of confirmation only in vitro study. However, these findings may provide the basic data for the further study on stroke.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgment

This research was supported by the Brain Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), which is funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (2012-0005827).

References

  1. R. W. V. Flynn, R. S. M. MacWalter, and A. S. F. Doney, “The cost of cerebral ischaemia,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 250–256, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. K. P. Doyle, R. P. Simon, and M. P. Stenzel-Poore, “Mechanisms of ischemic brain damage,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 310–318, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S. Kuroda and B. K. Siesjö, “Reperfusion damage following focal ischemia: pathophysiology and therapeutic windows,” Clinical Neuroscience, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 199–212, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  4. T. Nakamura, H. Minamisawa, Y. Katayama et al., “Increased intracellular Ca2+ concentration in the hippocampal CA1 area during global ischemia and reperfusion in the rat: a possible cause of delayed neuronal death,” Neuroscience, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 57–67, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. N. J. Abbott, A. A. K. Patabendige, D. E. M. Dolman, S. R. Yusof, and D. J. Begley, “Structure and function of the blood-brain barrier,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 13–25, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. J. Lee, M. C. Grabb, G. J. Zipfel, and D. W. Choi, “Brain tissue responses to ischemia,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 106, no. 6, pp. 723–731, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. J. P. MacManus, A. M. Buchan, I. E. Hill, I. Rasquinha, and E. Preston, “Global ischemia can cause DNA fragmentation indicative of apoptosis in rat brain,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 164, no. 1-2, pp. 89–92, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. S. Kihara, T. Shiraishi, S. Nakagawa, K. Toda, and K. Tabuchi, “Visualization of DNA double strand breaks in the gerbil hippocampal CA1 following transient ischemia,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 175, no. 1-2, pp. 133–136, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. G. M. Yan, R. P. Irwin, S. Z. Lin, M. Weller, K. A. Wood, and S. M. Paul, “Diphenylhydantoin induces apoptotic cell death of cultured rat cerebellar granule neurons,” Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 274, no. 2, pp. 983–990, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  10. F. C. Wilson, J. Harpur, T. Watson, and J. I. Morrow, “Adult survivors of severe cerebral hypoxia—case series survey and comparative analysis,” NeuroRehabilitation, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 291–298, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  11. H.-L. Hsieh and C.-M. Yang, “Role of redox signaling in neuroinflammation and neurodegenerative diseases,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2013, Article ID 484613, 18 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. J. Li, O. Wuliji, W. Li, Z. G. Jiang, and H. A. Ghanbari, “Oxidative stress and neurodegenerative disorders,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 24438–24475, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  13. X. Wang, W. Wang, L. Li, G. Perry, H. G. Lee, and X. Zhu, “Oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1842, no. 8, pp. 1240–1247, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. H. Yan, X. Wang, and X. Zhu, “Mitochondrial defects and oxidative stress in Alzheimer disease and Parkinson disease,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 62, pp. 90–101, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. W. Paschen, “Role of calcium in neuronal cell injury: which subcellular compartment is involved?” Brain Research Bulletin, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 409–413, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. P. H. Chan, “Reactive oxygen radicals in signaling and damage in the ischemic brain,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 2–14, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  17. C. Iadecola and M. Alexander, “Cerebral ischemia and inflammation,” Current Opinion in Neurology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 89–94, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. A. Petty and J. G. Wettstein, “Elements of cerebral microvascular ischaemia,” Brain Research Reviews, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 23–34, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. H. S. Noh, Y. Hah, R. Nilufar et al., “Acetoacetate protects neuronal cells from oxidative glutamate toxicity,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 702–709, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. B. Halliwell, “Free radicals, antioxidants, and human disease: curiosity, cause, or consequence?” The Lancet, vol. 344, no. 8924, pp. 721–724, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. T. Sugawara and P. H. Chan, “Reactive oxygen radicals and pathogenesis of neuronal death after cerebral ischemia,” Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 597–607, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. T. M. Millar, V. Phan, and L. A. Tibbles, “ROS generation in endothelial hypoxia and reoxygenation stimulates MAP kinase signaling and kinase-dependent neutrophil recruitment,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 1165–1177, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. J. A. McCubrey, M. M. LaHair, and R. A. Franklin, “Reactive oxygen species-induced activation of the MAP kinase signaling pathways,” Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, vol. 8, no. 9-10, pp. 1775–1789, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. M. Torres and H. J. Forman, “Redox signaling and the MAP kinase pathways,” BioFactors, vol. 17, no. 1–4, pp. 287–296, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. M. A. Bogoyevitch, J. Gillespie-Brown, A. J. Ketterman et al., “Stimulation of the stress-activated mitogen-activated protein kinase subfamilies in perfused heart: p38/RK mitogen-activated protein kinases and c-Jun N-terminal kinases are activated by ischemia/reperfusion,” Circulation Research, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 162–173, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. K. R. Laderoute and K. A. Webster, “Hypoxia/reoxygenation stimulates Jun kinase activity through redox signaling in cardiac myocytes,” Circulation Research, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 336–344, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. Z. Chen, T. B. Gibson, F. Robinson et al., “MAP kinases,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 101, no. 8, pp. 2449–2476, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. J. M. Kyriakis and J. Avruch, “Sounding the alarm: protein kinase cascades activated by stress and inflammation,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 271, no. 40, pp. 24313–24316, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. P. Rockwell, J. Martinez, L. Papa, and E. Gomes, “Redox regulates COX-2 upregulation and cell death in the neuronal response to cadmium,” Cellular Signalling, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 343–353, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. D. J. Li, T. Zhao, R. J. Xin, Y. Y. Wang, Y. B. Fei, and F. M. Shen, “Activation of alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor protects against oxidant stress damage through reducing vascular peroxidase-1 in a JNK signaling-dependent manner in endothelial cells,” Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 468–478, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  31. S. J. Harper and P. Lograsso, “Signalling for survival and death in neurones: the role of stress-activated kinases, JNK and p38,” Cellular Signalling, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 299–310, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. K. Nozaki, M. Nishimura, and N. Hashimoto, “Mitogen-activated protein kinases and cerebral ischemia,” Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. N. J. Abbott, “Astrocyte-endothelial interactions and blood-brain barrier permeability,” Journal of Anatomy, vol. 200, no. 6, pp. 629–638, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. P. Ballabh, A. Braun, and M. Nedergaard, “The blood-brain barrier: an overview: Structure, regulation, and clinical implications,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. M. Furuse, T. Hirase, M. Itoh, A. Nagafuchi, S. Yonemura, and S. Tsukita, “Occludin: a novel integral membrane protein localizing at tight junctions,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 123, no. 6, pp. 1777–1788, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. M. Furuse, K. Fujita, T. Hiiragi, K. Fujimoto, and S. Tsukita, “Claudin-1 and -2: novel integral membrane proteins localizing at tight junctions with no sequence similarity to occludin,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 141, no. 7, pp. 1539–1550, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. M. Furuse, H. Sasaki, and S. Tsukita, “Manner of interaction of heterogeneous claudin species within and between tight junction strands,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 147, no. 4, pp. 891–903, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. K. S. Mark and T. P. Davis, “Cerebral microvascular changes in permeability and tight junctions induced by hypoxia-reoxygenation,” American Journal of Physiology: Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 282, no. 4, pp. H1485–H1494, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  39. K. A. Witt, K. S. Mark, S. Hom, and T. P. Davis, “Effects of hypoxia-reoxygenation on rat blood-brain barrier permeability and tight junctional protein expression,” American Journal of Physiology—Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 285, no. 6, pp. H2820–H2831, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  40. K. S. Mark, A. R. Burroughs, R. C. Brown, J. D. Huber, and T. P. Davis, “Nitric oxide mediates hypoxia-induced changes in paracellular permeability of cerebral microvasculature,” The American Journal of Physiology: Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 286, no. 1, pp. H174–H180, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  41. S. D. Croll, J. H. Goodman, and H. E. Scharfman, “Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) in seizures: a double-edged sword,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 548, pp. 57–68, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. D. H. Dobrogowska, A. S. Lossinsky, M. Tarnawski, and A. W. Vorbrodt, “Increased blood-brain barrier permeability and endothelial abnormalities induced by vascular endothelial growth factor,” Brain Cell Biology, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 163–173, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  43. Z. G. Zhang, L. Zhang, Q. Jiang et al., “VEGF enhances angiogenesis and promotes blood-brain barrier leakage in the ischemic brain,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 106, no. 7, pp. 829–838, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. H. F. Dvorak, J. A. Nagy, D. Feng et al., “Vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor and the significance of microvascular hyperpermeability in angiogenesis,” Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology, vol. 237, pp. 97–132, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  45. B. Poeggeler, S. Saarela, R. J. Reiter et al., “Melatonin—a highly potent endogenous radical scavenger and electron donor: new aspects of the oxidation chemistry of this indole accessed in vitro,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 738, pp. 419–420, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  46. F. Dupuis, O. Régrigny, J. Atkinson et al., “Impact of treatment with melatonin on cerebral circulation in old rats,” The British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 141, no. 3, pp. 399–406, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. A. Wakatsuki, Y. Okatani, C. Izumiya, and N. Ikenoue, “Melatonin protects against ischemia and reperfusion-induced oxidative lipid and DNA damage in fetal rat brain,” Journal of Pineal Research, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 147–152, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. M. D. Ginsberg and R. Busto, “Rodent models of cerebral ischemia,” Stroke, vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 1627–1642, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. C. Harms, M. Lautenschlager, A. Bergk et al., “Melatonin is protective in necrotic but not in caspase-dependent, free radical-independent apoptotic neuronal cell death in primary neuronal cultures,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 1814–1824, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. Z. Pei and R. T. F. Cheung, “Melatonin protects SHSY5Y neuronal cells but not cultured astrocytes from ischemia due to oxygen and glucose deprivation,” Journal of Pineal Research, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 194–201, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. D. Lv, P. Cui, S. Yao, Y. Xu, and Z. Yang, “Melatonin inhibits the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in pancreatic cancer cells,” Chinese Journal of Cancer Research, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 310–316, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. M. Dai, P. Cui, M. Yu, J. Han, H. Li, and R. Xiu, “Melatonin modulates the expression of VEGF and HIF-1α induced by CoCl2 in cultured cancer cells,” Journal of Pineal Research, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 121–126, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. P. Lissoni, F. Rovelli, F. Malugani, R. Bucovec, A. Conti, and G. J. M. Maestroni, “Anti-angiogenic activity of melatonin in advanced cancer patients,” Neuroendocrinology Letters, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 45–47, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  54. H.-J. Jung, Y.-H. Jeon, K. K. Bokara et al., “Agmatine promotes the migration of murine brain endothelial cells via multiple signaling pathways,” Life Sciences, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 42–50, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. Z. Y. Mei, C. M. Chin, J. C. Yoon et al., “Agmatine inhibits matrix metalloproteinase-9 via endothelial nitric oxide synthase in cerebral endothelial cells,” Neurological Research, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 749–754, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. K. K. Bokara, K. H. Kwon, Y. Nho, W. T. Lee, K. A. Park, and J. E. Lee, “Retroviral expression of arginine decarboxylase attenuates oxidative burden in mouse cortical neural stem cells,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 527–537, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. S. Hong, C. Y. Kim, J. E. Lee, and G. J. Seong, “Agmatine protects cultured retinal ganglion cells from tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced apoptosis,” Life Sciences, vol. 84, no. 1-2, pp. 28–32, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. S. K. Ahn, S. Hong, Y. M. Park, W. T. Lee, K. A. Park, and J. E. Lee, “Effects of agmatine on hypoxic microglia and activity of nitric oxide synthase,” Brain Research, vol. 1373, pp. 48–54, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. J. A. Royall and H. Ischiropoulos, “Evaluation of 2',7'-dichlorofluorescin and dihydrorhodamine 123 as fluorescent probes for intracellular H2O2 in cultured endothelial cells,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 302, no. 2, pp. 348–355, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. C. Nyakas, B. Buwalda, and P. G. M. Luiten, “Hypoxia and brain development,” Progress in Neurobiology, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 1–51, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. J. Zhou, H. Kong, X. Hua, M. Xiao, J. Ding, and G. Hu, “Altered blood-brain barrier integrity in adult aquaporin-4 knockout mice,” NeuroReport, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. L. L. Rubin and J. M. Staddon, “The cell biology of the blood-brain barrier,” Annual Review of Neuroscience, vol. 22, pp. 11–28, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. G. J. del Zoppo, R. von Kummer, and G. F. Hamann, “Ischaemic damage of brain microvessels: inherent risks for thrombolytic treatment in stroke,” Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. R. Hardeland, “Antioxidative protection by melatonin: multiplicity of mechanisms from radical detoxification to radical avoidance,” Endocrine, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 119–130, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. G. Wu, R. L. Xue, J. R. Lv, W. Li, and X. M. Lei, “Fas and TNFR1 expressions after cerebral ischemia and reperfusion in rats: association with cell apoptosis and the effects of Bcl-2 overexpression,” Journal of Southern Medical University, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 1298–1303, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  66. V. Li, T. Brustovetsky, and N. Brustovetsky, “Role of cyclophilin D-dependent mitochondrial permeability transition in glutamate-induced calcium deregulation and excitotoxic neuronal death,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 218, no. 2, pp. 171–182, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. P. Lipton, “Ischemic cell death in brain neurons,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 1431–1568, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  68. A. V. Andjelkovic, S. M. Stamatovic, and R. F. Keep, “The protective effects of preconditioning on cerebral endothelial cells in vitro,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 1348–1355, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  69. M. I. Cervantes, P. M. de Oca Balderas, J. de Jesús Gutiérrez-Baños et al., “Comparison of antioxidant activity of hydroethanolic fresh and aged garlic extracts and their effects on cerebral ischemia,” Food Chemistry, vol. 140, no. 1-2, pp. 343–352, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. X.-C. Wang, Y.-C. Zhang, N. Chatterjie, I. Grundke-Iqbal, K. Iqbal, and J. Wang, “Effect of melatonin and melatonylvalpromide on β-amyloid and neurofilaments in N2a cells,” Neurochemical Research, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 1138–1144, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. J. Li, H. Yin, X. Gu, Y. Zhou, W. Zhang, and Y. Qin, “Melatonin protects liver from intestine ischemia reperfusion injury in rats,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 14, no. 48, pp. 7392–7396, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. J. Wang, J. Shen, Q. Gao et al., “Ischemic postconditioning protects against global cerebral ischemia/reperfusion-induced injury in rats,” Stroke, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 983–990, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. Y. C. Li, H. J. Lin, J. H. Yang et al., “Baicalein-induced apoptosis via endoplasmic reticulum stress through elevations of reactive oxygen species and mitochondria dependent pathway in mouse-rat hybrid retina ganglion cells (N18),” Neurochemical Research, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 418–429, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. S. Ozbal, B. U. Ergur, G. Erbil, I. Tekmen, A. Bagryank, and Z. Cavdar, “The effects of α-lipoic acid against testicular ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 2012, Article ID 489248, 8 pages, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. R. J. Reiter, “Antioxidant actions of melatonin.,” Advances in pharmacology, vol. 38, pp. 103–117, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  76. F. Tütünculer, S. Eskiocak, Ü. N. Başaran, G. Ekuklu, S. Ayvaz, and Ü. Vatansever, “The protective role of melatonin in experimental hypoxic brain damage,” Pediatrics International, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 434–439, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. D. Tan, R. J. Reiter, L. C. Manchester et al., “Chemical and physical properties and potential mechanisms: melatonin as a broad spectrum antioxidant and free radical scavenger,” Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 181–197, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. Ö. Çelik and M. Naziroǧlu, “Melatonin modulates apoptosis and TRPM2 channels in transfected cells activated by oxidative stress,” Physiology & Behavior, vol. 107, no. 3, pp. 458–465, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. P. D. Ray, B. W. Huang, and Y. Tsuji, “Reactive oxygen species (ROS) homeostasis and redox regulation in cellular signaling,” Cellular Signalling, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 981–990, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. E. Kubo, N. Miyoshi, M. Fukuda, and Y. Akagi, “Cataract formation through the polyol pathway is associated with free radical production,” Experimental Eye Research, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 457–464, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. Y. J. Lim, S. Zheng, and Z. Zuo, “Morphine preconditions purkinje cells against cell death under in vitro simulated ischemia-reperfusion conditions,” Anesthesiology, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 562–568, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. M. I. C. Alonso-Vale, S. Andreotti, S. B. Peres et al., “Melatonin enhances leptin expression by rat adipocytes in the presence of insulin,” American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 288, no. 4, pp. E805–E812, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. R. E. Hartman, J. M. Lee, G. J. Zipfel, and D. F. Wozniak, “Characterizing learning deficits and hippocampal neuron loss following transient global cerebral ischemia in rats,” Brain Research, vol. 1043, no. 1-2, pp. 48–56, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. K. Morita, H. Sasaki, K. Fujimoto, M. Furuse, and S. Tsukita, “Claudin-11/OSP-based tight junctions of myelin sheaths in brain and Sertoli cells in testis,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 145, no. 3, pp. 579–588, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. S. Liebner, A. Fischmann, G. Rascher et al., “Claudin-1 and claudin-5 expression and tight junction morphology are altered in blood vessels of human glioblastoma multiforme,” Acta Neuropathologica, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 323–331, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. S. Liebner, U. Kniesel, H. Kalbacher, and H. Wolburg, “Correlation of tight junction morphology with the expression of tight junction proteins in blood-brain barrier endothelial cells,” European Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 79, no. 10, pp. 707–717, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. A. Lippoldt, U. Kniesel, S. Liebner et al., “Structural alterations of tight junctions are associated with loss of polarity in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rat blood-brain barrier endothelial cells,” Brain Research, vol. 885, no. 2, pp. 251–261, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. T. Koto, K. Takubo, S. Ishida et al., “Hypoxia disrupts the barrier function of neural blood vessels through changes in the expression of claudin-5 in endothelial cells,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 170, no. 4, pp. 1389–1397, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. R. Tao, J. Huang, X. Shao et al., “Ischemic injury promotes Keap1 nitration and disturbance of antioxidative responses in endothelial cells: a potential vasoprotective effect of melatonin,” Journal of Pineal Research, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 271–281, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. T. J. Abbruscato and T. P. Davis, “Protein expression of brain endothelial cell E-cadherin after hypoxia/aglycemia: influence of astrocyte contact,” Brain Research, vol. 842, no. 2, pp. 277–286, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. C. Chryssanthou, T. Palaia, G. Goldstein, and R. Stenger, “Increase in blood-brain barrier permeability by altitude decompression,” Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine, vol. 58, no. 11, pp. 1082–1086, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  92. H. J. Schoch, S. Fischer, and H. H. Marti, “Hypoxia-induced vascular endothelial growth factor expression causes vascular leakage in the brain,” Brain, vol. 125, part 11, pp. 2549–2557, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. K. Hayashi, S. Nakao, R. Nakaoke, S. Nakagawa, N. Kitagawa, and M. Niwa, “Effects of hypoxia on endothelial/pericytic co-culture model of the blood-brain barrier,” Regulatory Peptides, vol. 123, no. 1–3, pp. 77–83, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. E. J. Battegay, “Angiogenesis: mechanistic insights, neovascular diseases, and therapeutic prospects,” Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 73, no. 7, pp. 333–346, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  95. M. Milkiewicz, E. Ispanovic, J. L. Doyle, and T. L. Haas, “Regulators of angiogenesis and strategies for their therapeutic manipulation,” International Journal of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 333–357, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. G. L. Semenza, “Hydroxylation of HIF-1: oxygen sensing at the molecular level,” Physiology, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 176–182, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. J. Jośko and M. Mazurek, “Transcription factors having impact on vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) gene expression in angiogenesis,” Medical Science Monitor, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. RA89–RA98, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  98. W. G. Mayhan, “VEGF increases permeability of the blood-brain barrier via a nitric oxide synthase/cGMP-dependent pathway,” American Journal of Physiology—Cell Physiology, vol. 276, no. 5, part 1, pp. C1148–C1153, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  99. P. P. Young, C. R. Fantz, and M. S. Sands, “VEGF disrupts the neonatal blood-brain barrier and increases life span after non-ablative BMT in a murine model of congenital neurodegeneration caused by a lysosomal enzyme deficiency,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 188, no. 1, pp. 104–114, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. P. Pichiule, J. C. Chávez, K. Xu, and J. C. Lamanna, “Vascular endothelial growth factor upregulation in transient global ischemia induced by cardiac arrest and resuscitation in rat brain,” Molecular Brain Research, vol. 74, no. 1-2, pp. 83–90, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  101. A. D. Sinor, S. M. Irvin, C. S. Cobbs, J. Chen, S. H. Graham, and D. A. Greenberg, “Hypoxic induction of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) protein in astroglial cultures,” Brain Research, vol. 812, no. 1-2, pp. 289–291, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  102. R. Walter, M. Maggiorini, U. Scherrer, J. Contesse, and W. H. Reinhart, “Effects of high-altitude exposure on vascular endothelial growth factor levels in man,” European Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 85, no. 1-2, pp. 113–117, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  103. D. O. Bates and S. J. Harper, “Regulation of vascular permeability by vascular endothelial growth factors,” Vascular Pharmacology, vol. 39, no. 4-5, pp. 225–237, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  104. M. Ersahin, H. Z. Toklu, Ş. Çetinel, M. Yüksel, B. Ç. Yèen, and G. Şener, “Melatonin reduces experimental subarachnoid hemorrhage-induced oxidative brain damage and neurological symptoms,” Journal of Pineal Research, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 324–332, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  105. H.-Y. Chen, T.-Y. Chen, M.-Y. Lee et al., “Melatonin decreases neurovascular oxidative/nitrosative damage and protects against early increases in the blood-brain barrier permeability after transient focal cerebral ischemia in mice,” Journal of Pineal Research, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 175–182, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  106. C. Kaur, V. Sivakumar, J. Lu, F. R. Tang, and E. A. Ling, “Melatonin attenuates hypoxia-induced ultrastructural changes and increased vascular permeability in the developing hippocampus,” Brain Pathology, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 533–547, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  107. Y. Zhang, Q. Liu, F. Wang et al., “Melatonin antagonizes hypoxia-mediated glioblastoma cell migration and invasion via inhibition of HIF-1α,” Journal of Pineal Research, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 121–130, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  108. C. Kaur, V. Sivakumar, J. Lu, and E. A. Ling, “Increased vascular permeability and nitric oxide production in response to hypoxia in the pineal gland,” Journal of Pineal Research, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 338–349, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  109. S. Maddika, S. R. Ande, S. Panigrahi et al., “Cell survival, cell death and cell cycle pathways are interconnected: implications for cancer therapy,” Drug Resistance Updates, vol. 10, no. 1-2, pp. 13–29, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  110. B. Wang, J. Shravah, H. Luo, K. Raedschelders, D. D. Y. Chen, and D. M. Ansley, “Propofol protects against hydrogen peroxide-induced injury in cardiac H9c2 cells via Akt activation and Bcl-2 up-regulation,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 389, no. 1, pp. 105–111, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  111. R. Kimura, M. Okouchi, H. Fujioka et al., “Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) protects against methylglyoxal-induced PC12 cell apoptosis through the PI3K/Akt/mTOR/GCLc/redox signaling pathway,” Neuroscience, vol. 162, no. 4, pp. 1212–1219, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  112. S. Lee, J. Shin, Y. Hong et al., “Beneficial effects of melatonin on stroke-induced muscle atrophy in focal cerebral ischemic rats,” Laboratory Animal Research, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 47–54, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  113. T. Jiang, Q. Chang, Z. Zhao et al., “Melatonin-mediated cytoprotection against hyperglycemic injury in Müller cells,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 12, Article ID e50661, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  114. S. H. Lee, W. Chun, P. J. Kong et al., “Sustained activation of Akt by melatonin contributes to the protection against kainic acid-induced neuronal death in hippocampus,” Journal of Pineal Research, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 79–85, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  115. P. Kong, J. Byun, S. Lim et al., “Melatonin induees Akt phosphorylation through Melatonin receptor- and PI3K-dependent pathways in primary astrocytes,” Korean Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 37–41, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  116. B. D. Manning and L. C. Cantley, “AKT/PKB signaling: navigating downstream,” Cell, vol. 129, no. 7, pp. 1261–1274, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  117. H. Zhou, L. Liu, Y. Zhang et al., “Glutathione prevents free fatty acids-induced oxidative stress and apoptosis in human brain vascular endothelial cells through Akt pathway,” CNS Neuroscience and Therapeutics, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 252–261, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  118. I. Shiojima and K. Walsh, “Role of Akt signaling in vascular homeostasis and angiogenesis,” Circulation Research, vol. 90, no. 12, pp. 1243–1250, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  119. G. Song, G. Ouyang, and S. Bao, “The activation of Akt/PKB signaling pathway and cell survival,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 59–71, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  120. J. Bai, L. Dong, Z. Song et al., “The role of melatonin as an antioxidant in human lens epithelial cells,” Free Radical Research, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 635–642, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  121. Y. Zhang, X. Wang, H. Yang et al., “Kinase AKT controls innate immune cell development and function,” Immunology, vol. 140, no. 2, pp. 143–152, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  122. B. A. Teicher, “Molecular targets and cancer therapeutics: discovery, development and clinical validation,” Drug Resistance Updates, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 67–73, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  123. Y. Huang, D. Wu, and W. Fan, “Protection of ginsenoside Rg1 on chondrocyte from IL-1beta-induced mitochondria-activated apoptosis through PI3K/Akt signaling,” Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 392, no. 1-2, pp. 249–257, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  124. X. Zhang, L. Bi, Y. Ye, and J. Chen, “Formononetin induces apoptosis in PC-3 prostate cancer cells through enhancing the Bax/Bcl-2 ratios and regulating the p38/Akt pathway,” Nutrition and Cancer, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 656–661, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  125. C. Xu, A. Wu, H. Zhu et al., “Melatonin is involved in the apoptosis and necrosis of pancreatic cancer cell line SW-1990 via modulating of Bcl-2/Bax balance,” Biomedicine and Pharmacotherapy, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 133–139, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  126. M. Mohseni, E. Mihandoost, A. Shirazi, Z. Sepehrizadeh, J. T. Bazzaz, and M. Ghazi-Khansari, “Melatonin may play a role in modulation of bax and bcl-2 expression levels to protect rat peripheral blood lymphocytes from gamma irradiation-induced apoptosis,” Mutation Research—Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis, vol. 738-739, no. 1, pp. 19–27, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  127. F. M. Ho, S. H. Liu, C. S. Liau, P. J. Huang, and S. Y. Lin-Shiau, “High glucose-induced apoptosis in human endothelial cells is mediated by sequential activations of c-JUN NH2-terminal kinase and caspase-3,” Circulation, vol. 101, no. 22, pp. 2618–2624, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  128. W. Takabe, R. Li, L. Ai, F. Yu, J. A. Berliner, and T. K. Hsiai, “Oxidized low-density lipoprotein-activated c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase regulates manganese superoxide dismutase ubiquitination: implication for mitochondrial redox status and apoptosis,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 436–441, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  129. G. Garin, J. Abe, A. Mohan et al., “Flow antagonizes TNF-α signaling in endothelial cells by inhibiting caspase-dependent PKCζ processing,” Circulation Research, vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 97–105, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  130. H. M. Shen and Z. G. Liu, “JNK signaling pathway is a key modulator in cell death mediated by reactive oxygen and nitrogen species,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 928–939, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  131. B. Cai, X. Li, Y. Wang et al., “Apoptosis of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells caused by homocysteine via activating jnk signal,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 5, Article ID e63561, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  132. W. S. Choi, S. Y. Yoon, T. H. Oh, E. J. Choi, K. L. O'Malley, and Y. J. Oh, “Two distinct mechanisms are involved in 6-hydroxydopamine- and MPP+-induced dopaminergic neuronal cell death: role of caspases, ROS, and JNK,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 86–94, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  133. K. Chang, C. Hsu, S. Liu et al., “Cadmium induces apoptosis in pancreatic beta-cells through a mitochondria-dependent pathway: the role of oxidative stress-mediated c-Jun N-terminal kinase activation,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 2, Article ID e54374, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  134. E. Shaulian and M. Karin, “AP-1 as a regulator of cell life and death,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. E131–E136, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  135. G. A. Rosenberg, “Matrix metalloproteinases in neuroinflammation,” Glia, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 279–291, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  136. Y. Gao, A. P. Signore, W. Yin et al., “Neuroprotection against focal ischemic brain injury by inhibition of c-Jun N-terminal kinase and attenuation of the mitochondrial apoptosis-signaling pathway,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 694–712, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  137. Q.-H. Guan, D.-S. Pei, Y.-Y. Zong, T.-L. Xu, and G.-Y. Zhang, “Neuroprotection against ischemic brain injury by a small peptide inhibitor of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) via nuclear and non-nuclear pathways,” Neuroscience, vol. 139, no. 2, pp. 609–627, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  138. Q. H. Guan, D. S. Pei, X. M. Liu, X. T. Wang, T. L. Xu, and G. Y. Zhang, “Neuroprotection against ischemic brain injury by SP600125 via suppressing the extrinsic and intrinsic pathways of apoptosis,” Brain Research, vol. 1092, no. 1, pp. 36–46, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  139. T. Borsellol, P. G. H. Clarkel, L. Hirt et al., “A peptide inhibitor of c-Jun N-terminal kinase protects against excitotoxicity and cerebral ischemia,” Nature Medicine, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 1180–1186, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Juhyun Song et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

2948 Views | 987 Downloads | 21 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19.