Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity / 2016 / Article
Special Issue

Modulation of Oxidative Stress: Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Aspects

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 6859523 | 10 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6859523

Mitochondrion-Permeable Antioxidants to Treat ROS-Burst-Mediated Acute Diseases

Academic Editor: Luciano Saso
Received09 Apr 2015
Revised09 Jul 2015
Accepted14 Jul 2015
Published16 Nov 2015


Reactive oxygen species (ROS) play a crucial role in the inflammatory response and cytokine outbreak, such as during virus infections, diabetes, cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and neurodegenerative diseases. Therefore, antioxidant is an important medicine to ROS-related diseases. For example, ascorbic acid (vitamin C, VC) was suggested as the candidate antioxidant to treat multiple diseases. However, long-term use of high-dose VC causes many side effects. In this review, we compare and analyze all kinds of mitochondrion-permeable antioxidants, including edaravone, idebenone, α-Lipoic acid, carotenoids, vitamin E, and coenzyme Q10, and mitochondria-targeted antioxidants MitoQ and SkQ and propose astaxanthin (a special carotenoid) to be the best antioxidant for ROS-burst-mediated acute diseases, like avian influenza infection and ischemia-reperfusion. Nevertheless, astaxanthins are so unstable that most of them are inactivated after oral administration. Therefore, astaxanthin injection is suggested hypothetically. The drawbacks of the antioxidants are also reviewed, which limit the use of antioxidants as coadjuvants in the treatment of ROS-associated disorders.

1. Introduction

Endogenous reactive oxygen species (ROS) were produced in cells over time, causing oxidative-damage to nucleic acids, protein, lipids, and other cellular components. ROS are now considered as signalling molecules to change the expression of a large number of genes [1]. The relationship between some diseases and oxidative-damage has been well studied. A large number of reports showed that oxidative stress is correlated with the pathogenesis of multiple age-related diseases, like cancer and neurodegenerative diseases, and several other common diseases such as ischemia-reperfusion injury, stroke, hypertension, heart failure, atherosclerosis, diabetes, rheumatic diseases, and Alzheimer disease [210]. Therefore, a lot of antioxidants have been adopted to prevent and alleviate disease-accompanying oxidative-damage. However, some human clinical data of antioxidant therapeutics indicated negative or ambiguous results or insignificant benefits. Even some antioxidants showed apparent side effects [10, 11]. In this review, we compare representative mitochondrion-permeable antioxidants through analyzing their therapeutic mechanisms, the application ranges, and side effects.

2. ROS-Burst-Mediated Acute Diseases

2.1. ROS Burst in Ischemia-Reperfusion

When blood supply or oxygen supply returns to the ischemic tissue, the reperfusion injury occurs. In this condition, restoration of blood flow and oxygen supply does not restore cellular normal functions but induces inflammation and oxidative-damage [3, 12].

Reperfusion of ischemic tissues is usually accompanied with microvascular damage, which increases capillary and arteriole permeability and leads to fluid filtration and diffusion. These damaged endothelial cells generate more ROS but less nitric oxide after reperfusion, and the disequilibrium induces subsequently inflammatory responses [3, 12, 13]. At the same time, leukocytes, circulated with the newly returning blood, release interleukins, free radicals, and other inflammatory factors, which damage the tissue further [3, 12, 13]. The reintroduced oxygen damages nucleic acids, enzymes, and the plasma membrane. Oxidative-damaged cellular membrane may release more ROS in turn. Then ROS may also trigger redox signalling indirectly and the subsequent cell death or apoptosis. Leukocytes may also bind to the small capillary endothelium, causing more ischemia [3, 12, 13].

2.2. ROS Burst in Avian Influenza Infections

The infection of avian influenza virus (AIV) results in multiple complications to the patient, causing multiorgan failures and may be associated with the excessive immune responses, which may be the main reason for its high pathogenicity and mortality [2, 10]. The AIV infection induces a cytokine storm, including chemokines, interferon-inducible protein IP-10, interferon β, and interleukin-6 (IL-6) and cell death presumably [1417]. Investigations suggested that healthy young people with stronger immune system may become a main target of AIV attacks [2].

In our previous review of the drugs to avian influenza infection, a large drug combination (including antioxidants, protectant of mitochondrial membrane permeability, immunomodulators, protease inhibitors, and antiviral drugs) is proposed, which mainly focuses on cytokine control and may greatly reduce the mortality rate hypothetically [2]. For the drug combination, antioxidant is the most important medicine suggested, because of the fact that ROS play a crucial role in the inflammatory response and cytokine outbreak [18]. Neutrophil aggregation and oxidative-damage to alveolar epithelial membrane result in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) finally. The activated neutrophils induce a ROS burst (more than ten times explosion).

There are many similarities between pulmonary ischemia-reperfusion and AIV infection-induced ARDS. Both of the oxidative injuries include the following: (i) lipid peroxidation and oxidative-damage to cytomembrane and the organelle-membrane; (ii) enzyme activity inhibition; (iii) lysosomal protease releasing; and (iv) chemoattractant generation and aggregation of more neutrophils [19]. Thereby free radicals form a self-amplification feedback loop [18].

H1N1 infection also inhibits patient’s catalase expression, therefore causing the hydrogen peroxide accumulation [20], while H5N1 triggers extracellular calcium influx, which induces apoptosis [21].

Major inflammatory response is the mitochondrial dysfunction. AIV infection or ischemia-reperfusion induces calcium overload and mitochondrial permeability transition (mPT). Apoptosis indicator cytochrome c is released from mitochondria. Cyclosporine A (CsA) can prevent this mitochondrial permeability transition and the subsequent apoptosis [22]. CsA-treated cells are protected from ischemia-reperfusion injury, but not from tumour necrosis factor α (TNFα) or Bax (Bcl-2 associated X protein) induced cell death [22]. Both ROS-mediated apoptotic pathway and NF-κB-mediated survival pathway are activated by the TNFα. ROS accumulation facilitates the cell-death pathway [23]. The ratio of proapoptotic protein Bax to antiapoptotic protein Bcl-2 is also regulated by the ROS level. Superoxide anion induces the survival pathways, while hydrogen peroxide triggers the cell-death pathways [24]. Thus antioxidants may block both TNFα and Bax-mediated apoptosis pathways [2].

2.3. Vitamin C May Be Potentially Used as the Candidate Antioxidant to Treat Avian Influenza Infections

In view of the advantages such as relatively effective, nontoxic, and easy to be absorbed, ascorbic acid (vitamin C, VC) was suggested as the candidate antioxidant for avian influenza infections [2]. VC scavenges free radicals through a nonenzymatic process. In the 19th century, VC was used to cure cold (influenza infection), encephalitis, hepatitis, and some other viral diseases for over a hundred years [2527].

An investigation indicated that 50% of H5N1-infected patients in Vietnam did not die. Ely [28] found that the survivals may take large amounts of VC from their foods, which may alleviate the inflammatory responses.

Influenza patients need 4.4 g or higher levels of VC to control the virus or alleviate the symptom [2528]. However, the common oral dosage of VC tablets is 100–300 mg a day, much lower than the influenza treatment requires. Oral intakes of VC that exceed 1 g may cause side effects, like vomiting, stomach cramps, diarrhea, and nausea [2528]. Therefore the VC injection should be used for AIV infections. Nevertheless, high doses are still required. Additionally, long-term use of high level of VC (>2-3 g a day) may result in scurvy after VC administration is stopped [2527]. These drawbacks should be considered before the clinical therapies.

2.4. Other ROS-Related Airway Disorders, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, for Example

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major and rapidly increasing health problem associated with a chronic inflammatory response, predominantly in small airways and lung parenchyma. Oxidative stress induced by reactive oxygen species and nitrogen species plays a central role in the pathophysiology of COPD [29]. At the subcellular level, mitochondrial dysfunction (accompanied with a decreased mitochondrial membrane potential) in patients with COPD is associated with excessive mitochondrial ROS levels, which contribute to enhanced inflammation and cell hyperproliferation. Thus, targeting mitochondrial ROS represents a promising therapeutic approach in patients with COPD, such as the mitochondria-targeted antioxidant MitoQ (see later discussion of MitoQ) [30].

3. Mitochondrion-Permeable Antioxidants

The most pivotal aspects of antioxidant therapies are the site concentration effects. Antioxidant efficiency is fully dependent on the locus concentration, since, as many other pharmaceutical compounds, antioxidants also have their “pharmacological windows.” Therefore, these scavenging/quenching compounds should concentrate in the target-tissue (or subcellular site) in order to efficiently remove exceeding ROS without eliminating essential redox signalling molecules, such as nitric oxide, hydrogen peroxide, S-Nitrosoglutathione (GSNO), and nitro/nitrosyl-lipid peroxides [24, 31]. It is well known that cellular redox status defines the fate of one cell. Depending on the redox status, eukaryotic cells could proliferate, keep it in steady state (G0 phase), or enter into cell death, either by apoptosis (moderate oxidative condition; intrinsic mitochondrial pathway) or by necrosis (high oxidative insults) [24, 31]. More interestingly, the redox status sensibility varies obviously upon the cell type that hepatic cells are more plastic than neurons [32]. Therefore, the biggest challenge researchers have nowadays on prescribing antioxidant therapies is how to reach the proper antioxidant concentration in situ for a precise redox modulation against a ROS-mediated pathology.

As discussed above, ROS-burst-mediated mitochondrial dysfunction and mitochondrial-derived apoptosis play a crucial role in the inflammatory response during avian influenza infection or ischemia-reperfusion. Thus for these ROS-burst-mediated acute diseases, mitochondrion-permeable antioxidants should be much more effective than water-soluble antioxidants (like VC). Edaravone, idebenone, α-Lipoic acid, carotenoids (especially astaxanthin), vitamin E, coenzyme Q10, and mitochondria-targeted antioxidants MitoQ and SkQ are summarized as follows (Table 1 and Figure 1). Interestingly, most of them contain a six-membered carbon-ring with a long alkyl side chain and multiple hydroxyl groups and aldehyde groups (Figure 1). All of them are liposoluble. Therefore, they could traverse across the cell membrane and the mitochondrial membrane and accumulate in mitochondria. On the contrary, most water-soluble antioxidants are distributed in the cytosol (Figure 1).

Drug’s nameClinical usesDrawbacksPossible side effects

EdaravoneIschemic strokeLimited testing and sometimes ineffectiveNephrotoxicity [95]

IdebenoneAlzheimer diseaseLimited testing and sometimes ineffectiveGastrointestinal complaints, neurotoxicity, and cardiotoxicity [95]

α-Lipoic acidDiabetic neuropathy and eye-related disordersLimited testing and sometimes ineffectiveHeadache, tingling, skin rash, or muscle cramps [95]

CarotenoidsInflammation, cancer, and cardiovascular diseasesSometimes ineffectiveDamage to skeletal muscle integrity (high-dose) [44], canthaxanthin retinopathy [102], and lung cancer in heavy smokers [103]

Vitamin EInflammation, cancer, and cardiovascular diseasesSometimes ineffectiveHemorrhage and vitamin K deficiency (high-dose) [45]

Coenzyme Q10Heart failure, migraine, hypertension, and neurodegenerative diseasesLimited testing, insoluble in water, therefore in low bioavailability, and sometimes ineffectiveLargely gastrointestinal complaints (very high-dose) [50]

MitoQAlzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, hypertension, diabetes, heart attack, sepsis, alcohol-induced steatohepatitis, and cocaine cardiotoxicitySometimes ineffective in human bodiesNo side effect observed (even after a long-term oral administration) [56]

SkQAge-related diseasesLimited testingNo side effect observed [59]

AstaxanthinAtherosclerosis, coronary heart disease and ischemic brain damage, age-related macular degeneration, acute pain, inflammation, cancer, and cardiovascular diseasesInsoluble in water and sometimes ineffectiveNo side effect observed [6064]

3.1. Representative Mitochondrion-Permeable Antioxidants

Edaravone (3-methyl-l-phenyl-pyrazoline-5-one) has been approved in Japan since 2001. Edaravone can reduce ischemic-stroke-induced neuronal damage [33]. However, there are also studies that do not approve the effects. Even some cases of nephrotoxicity were reported for edaravone [34].

Idebenone (2,3-dimethoxy-5-methyl-6-(10-hydroxydecyl)-1,4-benzoquinonenoben) is a short chain benzoquinone, structurally similar to coenzyme Q10. Idebenone functions as an antioxidant and electron carrier [35]. Although idebenone has some effects on Alzheimer’s diseases [35, 36], the solid clinical evidences are still missing. Therefore, its clinical application is limited [37]. The most common side effects are gastrointestinal complaints and some level of neurotoxicity or cardiotoxicity [38].

α-Lipoic acid (LA) is a unique lipid and water-soluble antioxidant. It is a naturally occurring dithiol compound and essential for mitochondrial bioenergetic process [39]. LA and its reduced-form dihydrolipoic acid are important mitochondrion-permeable antioxidants. LA has been approved for diabetic neuropathy treatment [39, 40].

Carotenoids, consisting of over 600 lipid-soluble plant pigments and a few water-soluble carotenoids (such as crocin), are present in many fruits and vegetables. The common carotenoids include α-carotene, β-carotene, lycopene, β-cryptoxanthin, lutein, and zeaxanthin [41]. Among them, β-carotene, the vitamin A precursor, has been most well studied. They neutralize free radicals effectively [42]. However, there are inconsistent conclusions about the role of β-carotene in cardiovascular diseases (CVD) prevention [43]. Moreover, a study indicated that high intake of carotenoids resulted in a faster skeletal muscle breakdown (skeletal muscle integrity reducing) [44]. Astaxanthin is a peculiar carotenoid, which will be discussed in detail later.

Among the vitamin E family, α-tocopherol is the most predominant form. The hepatic α-tocopherol transfer protein binds and carries α-tocopherol to all body’s cells [45]. Most α-tocopherol is associated with lipoproteins, scavenging LCOO results and inhibiting low-density lipoprotein (LDL) oxidation. Thus, α-tocopherol is thought to have a role in atherosclerosis prevention. The uptake process of oxidized LDL by the macrophage scavenger receptor and the foam cell formation are blocked by the α-tocopherol treatment [46]. However, some reports did not support the protective role of vitamin E in prostate cancer [47, 48].

Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), with its oxidized-form ubiquinone and reduced-form ubiquinol, is an endogenous lipid, which participates in the mitochondrial electron transport in the respiratory chain [49]. CoQ10 has been used to treat a variety of diseases, such as cardiovascular diseases [50], migraine [51], hypertension [52], and neurodegenerative diseases [53]. Although CoQ10 is considered a safe drug, further large-scale studies are still needed to show its clinical usefulness.

MitoQ was designed in the late 1990s as a mitochondria-targeted antioxidant by Kelso et al. [54]. Both MitoQ and coenzyme Q10 belong to the ubiquinone components. The ubiquinone structure of MitoQ can be activated in the mitochondrion (by the mitochondrial respiratory complex II) to form the ubiquinol antioxidant. Thus, MitoQ increases the mitochondrial antioxidant capacity in situ and thereby decreases mitochondrial oxidative-damage [54].

MitoQ is a lipophilic molecule bearing a cation moiety, which makes it pass directly through the mitochondrial membrane, because of the fact that the component is positively charged (a hydrophobic structure) [55]. Therefore, MitoQ is an effective mitochondria-targeted antioxidant.

The ability of MitoQ and the mitochondrial oxidative-damage after the treatments (oral or intraperitoneal administration) have been studied in the mouse model. The following diseases have been studied: Alzheimer’s disease, hypertension, type I diabetes, heart attack, sepsis, fatty liver disease, alcohol-induced steatohepatitis, doxorubicin, and cocaine cardiotoxicity [56, 57]. These findings are consistent with the conclusion that mitochondrial oxidative-damage is the potential therapeutic target in multiple diseases and pathologies.

However, for Parkinson’s disease trials, MitoQ did not show a benefit, maybe because of the irreversible neuronal damage in patient’s brain cells [58]. Therefore, more studies of MitoQ in humans are much needed. Moreover, only successful phase II assessments of oral MitoQ tablets were reported. It is not a FDA-approved drug so far.

SkQ (10-(6′-plastoquinonyl)decyltriphenyl-phosphonium) also is organic molecules composed of a large number of organic cations attached with a plastoquinone. SkQ traverses across the cellular membranes and accumulates in mitochondria. The level of a penetrating cation in mitochondria can be more than 1000-fold higher than its extracellular level [59]. Therefore, it is another mitochondria-targeted antioxidant.

Several studies indicated that SkQ protects cells from age-related diseases efficiently, including cataract, retinopathy, glaucoma, balding, canities, osteoporosis, hypothermia, and torpor [59]. However, its safety and the clinical usefulness need further investigations. Like MitoQ, SkQ is also not a FDA-approved drug so far.

3.2. Astaxanthin Is a Promising Antioxidant

Better than above antioxidants, here we introduce another one, astaxanthin, to be a candidate drug for AIV infection cure and some other diseases (Table 1). Astaxanthin, a dietary carotenoid, is present in algae, shrimp, lobster, crab, salmon, and some other organisms [6064]. Its antioxidant activity is far exceeding the existing antioxidants. The ROS-scavenging capacity is 6000 times that of VC, 800 times that of coenzyme Q10, 550 times that of VE, 200 times that of polyphenols, 150 times that of anthocyanins, and 75 times that of α-Lipoic acid [65]. Most importantly, no apparent side effects or negative results have been reported for astaxanthin [6062]. In leukocyte cells, half of the total astaxanthin is distributed in the mitochondria. Astaxanthin is also distributed in microsomes and nuclei [66]. Therefore, it is a mitochondrion-permeable antioxidant.

Natural astaxanthin plays an important role in preventing atherosclerosis. Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) oxidation is the main reason of atherosclerosis. Astaxanthin treatment increased high-density lipoprotein (HDL) significantly and reduced LDL effectively, while β-carotene or canthaxanthin has no such effect. The main reason may be that only astaxanthin can reduce apolipoprotein oxidation, therefore being important for preventing arteriosclerosis, cardiovascular diseases, and ischemic brain damage [67, 68].

Astaxanthin also maintains the eyes and central nervous system healthy. Retina contains high levels of unsaturated fatty acids and oxygen supply. The singlet oxygen is generated in the retina upon high-energy light illumination. However, for mammals, carotenoids in diet are enough to maintain eye health and can quench these free radicals [69]. Recent study indicated that astaxanthin can pass through the blood-brain barrier and prevent retina cell oxidation [70]. Astaxanthin also has a good effect on preventing and treating macular degeneration [70].

Astaxanthin is an anti-inflammatory and pain reliever, blocking different biochemical factors that cause ouch and pain [71]. More specifically, astaxanthin inhibits cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2) enzyme activities, which are related with many diseases, such as osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, dysmenorrhea, and acute pain [72]. Astaxanthin and Celebrex (another COX2 inhibitor) work cooperatively for some diseases, which therefore were suggested to be taken both together to alleviate oxidative-damage [72].

Astaxanthin affects not only the COX2 signalling pathway but also multiple cytokines, like nitric oxide, interleukin 1-β, prostaglandin E2, C-Reactive Protein (CRP), NF-κB, and TNFα [72]. A study also showed that astaxanthin is a useful antioxidant to treat insulin resistance by protecting cells from TNFα and palmitate-induced oxidative-damage [73]. Recent study suggested that astaxanthin also inhibits apoptosis in alveolar epithelial cells via mitochondrial ROS signalling pathways, also indicating its mitochondrial location [74].

Astaxanthin also activates T-cell and inhibits autoimmune reactions [75]. The risk of many different types of cancer can be significantly reduced by dietary intake of astaxanthin along with other carotenoids [7678]. In the mouse breast cancer model, astaxanthin treatment caused higher levels of apoptotic cancer cells and protective interferons, inhibiting tumor growth [79]. (i) Astaxanthin prevents cancer initiation by alleviating DNA oxidative-damage [80, 81]. (ii) Astaxanthin promotes early check and elimination of cells undergoing malignant transformation by activating immune surveillance [82]. (iii) Astaxanthin prevents cancer cell growth in cells by boosting immune detection [83, 84]. (iv) Astaxanthin inhibits rapid tumor cell growth by blocking tumor cell reproductive cycle and inducing tumor cell apoptosis [8587]. (v) Astaxanthin prevents tumor cell spreading by decreasing tumor cell’s tissue-melting proteins [84].

McNulty et al. [88] studied membrane structures of carotenoids and the relationship to their biological activities. They found that the vertical orientation of astaxanthin in membranes may be crucial for its high efficiency on removing aggressive free radicals from membranes, especially in the presence of water-soluble antioxidants, such as glutathione and/or ascorbic acid [88].

4. Side Effects of Antioxidants

Most of the so-called antioxidant compounds also develop prooxidant properties under specific conditions, such as ascorbic acid (>1 mM) that induces Fe(III) reduction to Fe(II) [89]. Epigallocatechin 3-gallate (EGCG) produces hydrogen peroxide and hydroxyl radicals in the presence of Fe(III) [90].

Clinical trials of some antioxidants in humans showed negative or ambiguous results or insignificant benefits [10, 11, 9195]. The reasons may be as follows. (i) Oxidative-damage is neither the primary cause nor the only cause of the disease. (ii) Patients do not benefit from the same antioxidant treatment equally. (iii) Some antioxidants by oral administration are of lower efficiencies. (iv) Some antioxidant molecules have toxic effects that mask their ROS-scavenging activities. (v) Certain antioxidants are not effective in well-nourished populations [11, 95].

On the other hand, ROS accumulation does not always correlate with disease onsets positively. Watson [96] postulates that diabetes (especially the type 2 diabetes), dementias, cardiovascular disease, and some cancers may develop, when oxidative redox potential in the endoplasmic reticulum is too low to form normal disulphide bonds [9799]. Maintaining a certain level of ROS may be necessary for correct protein folding with disulphide bonds, which may be associated with type 2 diabetes and Alzheimer’s disease or some other diseases [96, 100, 101]. Thus, the antioxidants may produce negative or ineffective impacts on some diseases.

Interactions of carotenoids (such as canthaxanthin) with the lipid membranes and the aggregation of this pigment may be the factors enhancing canthaxanthin toxicity towards the macula vascular system, which leads to the further development of canthaxanthin retinopathy [102]. And high and long-term beta-carotene supplementation may increase lung tumor rates in heavy smokers [103].

5. Hypothesis of Astaxanthin Injection

Side effects of antioxidants (antioxidant-induced stress) only present when antioxidants overwhelm the body’s free radicals [11]. Thus, antioxidants should be used carefully for chronic diseases, such as diabetes and Alzheimer’s disease, when cellular ROS levels are not particularly high (no ROS bursts occur). However, for ROS-burst-mediated acute diseases, such as avian influenza infection and ischemia-reperfusion, antioxidants should be used as early as possible to avoid or retard excessive immune responses. Mitochondrion-permeable or mitochondria-targeted antioxidants are preferred.

Astaxanthin is a good candidate drug for these acute diseases. However, so far, astaxanthin is not a clinical drug but merely a health care product. Most studies showed that its treatment effects are not as good as people expect, contrasting to its extraordinary high antioxidant activities [61]. One of the reasons may be that astaxanthin is usually applied by oral administration (such as astaxanthin soft capsule). All nourishments and oral drugs are digested in the gastrointestinal tract and then absorbed into gastric veins and intestinal veins and transported to the liver through the portal vein. Then, after the liver’s process, they are transported throughout the body via heart and arteries. Astaxanthin is easy to be oxidized that most of them are inactivated during the digestion, absorption, and transportation. After avian influenza virus infection, for instance, severe oxidative-damage occurs at the lungs, where neither oral VC tablets nor oral astaxanthin capsules could reach effectively. For the same reason, active (reduced) astaxanthin could not reach atherosclerosis sites, retina, or brain arteries ideally too. Therefore the injection approach of astaxanthin may be adopted to these patients. It is well known that vitamin E injection (a mixture of oil for injection and VE) is better absorbed by the body since it goes directly into the blood stream [60, 62]. And recent studies indicated that VC injections have strong anticancer effects, especially when intravenous glutathione or vitamin K3 was applied synergistically [104, 105]. A similar astaxanthin injection could be easily developed. For AIV infections, astaxanthin by injection can be quickly absorbed and go directly into the pulmonary alveoli, where inflammatory reactions occur, through the body’s blood circulation system.

It is well known that water- and lipid-soluble antioxidants act in synergism to efficiently remove aggressive radicals from hydrophobic compartments and, thereby, inhibit lipid peroxidation, which is extremely harmful to most organelles [106]. The collaborative mechanism involving α-tocopherol through tocopheryl formation and ascorbic acid has been studied since the middle of the 90s [106]. In other words, by combining lipid-soluble antioxidants (such as astaxanthin) with water-soluble ones (such as ascorbic acid) in lower concentrations, higher efficiency on ROS removal may be expected. However, cellular ROS should not be removed entirely for retaining the essential redox signalling molecules. The precise dosages need further investigations.

The astaxanthin injection might be suitable for other kinds of disease-accompanying oxidative-damage and inflammations. However, the astaxanthin injection must be subjected to clinical trials and FDA approval. Nevertheless, they are time-consuming processes. Before FDA approval, oral astaxanthin capsules are still suggested for AIV-infected patients. Because when most patients are identified as having avian influenza infections, they have been sick for several days, near or after the time pulmonary symptom developed. Their alveolar cells may become damaged. Thus the risk to develop acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is very high. So, for the general public, timely oral administration of antioxidants before the diagnosis in the hospital is very important [2, 107]. No matter if infected with avian influenza or common influenza, the patient is recommended to take VC (800–1000 mg a day presumably) or/and astaxanthin (24–48 mg a day presumably) before the hospital examination.

6. Conclusions

Considering the adverse effects of antioxidants, antioxidant drugs should be used carefully for chronic diseases, especially for diabetes and Alzheimer’s disease, when a certain level of ROS is required for normally cellular functions. However, for ROS-burst-mediated acute diseases, mitochondrion-permeable antioxidants should be used in the early stage.

To treat ROS-accompanying diseases, no matter chronic or acute, antioxidants should be used combined with other therapeutic drugs. However, drug combinations may have additive or possible antagonistic effects on the disease development. And the dosage of the single compound should be adjusted according to the combination. Thus, carefully pharmaceutic studies should be done before certain antioxidant (e.g., astaxanthin injection) can really enter the clinical trial to oxidative-damage-related illnesses.

Conflict of Interests

The authors confirm that this paper content has no conflict of interests.

Authors’ Contribution

Zhong-Wei Zhang and Xiao-Chao Xu contribute equally to this work.


This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31300207), the Funds from Sichuan Province Ministry of Education (13ZB0296 and 014z1700), and the Preeminent Youth Fund of Sichuan Province (2015JQO045).


  1. H.-L. Hsieh and C.-M. Yang, “Role of redox signaling in neuroinflammation and neurodegenerative diseases,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2013, Article ID 484613, 18 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. S. Yuan, “Drugs to cure avian influenza infection—multiple ways to prevent cell death,” Cell Death and Disease, vol. 4, no. 10, article e835, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. D. L. Carden and D. N. Granger, “Pathophysiology of ischaemia-reperfusion injury,” Journal of Pathology, vol. 190, no. 3, pp. 255–266, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. R. K. Naviaux, “Oxidative shielding or oxidative stress?” The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 342, no. 3, pp. 608–618, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. H. Y. Aboul-Enein, P. Berczyński, and I. Kruk, “Phenolic compounds: the role of redox regulation in neurodegenerative disease and cancer,” Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 385–398, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  6. C. Gorrini, I. S. Harris, and T. W. Mak, “Modulation of oxidative stress as an anticancer strategy,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 931–947, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. B. Jiang, S. Xiao, M. A. Khan, and M. Xue, “Defective antioxidant systems in cervical cancer,” Tumor Biology, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 2003–2009, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. Y. Kitagishi and S. Matsuda, “Redox regulation of tumor suppressor PTEN in cancer and aging (Review),” International Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 511–515, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. M. Majzunova, I. Dovinova, M. Barancik, and J. Y. H. Chan, “Redox signaling in pathophysiology of hypertension,” Journal of Biomedical Science, vol. 20, no. 1, article 69, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. R. Sgarbanti, D. Amatore, I. Celestino et al., “Intracellular redox state as target for anti-influenza therapy: are antioxidants always effective?” Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 14, no. 22, pp. 2529–2541, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. C. Villanueva and R. D. Kross, “Antioxidant-induced stress,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 2091–2109, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. C. Nastos, K. Kalimeris, N. Papoutsidakis et al., “Global consequences of liver ischemia/reperfusion injury,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2014, Article ID 906965, 13 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. Z.-W. Zhang, J. Cheng, F. Xu et al., “Mammal cells double their total RNAs against diabetes, ischemia reperfusion and malaria-induced oxidative stress,” Molecular Medicine, vol. 17, no. 5-6, pp. 533–541, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. C. W. Chan, C. Y. Cheung, W. H. Chui et al., “Proinflammatory cytokine responses induced by influenza A (H5N1) viruses in primary human alveolar and bronchial epithelial cells,” Respiratory Research, vol. 6, article 135, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. L. A. Perrone, J. K. Plowden, A. García-Sastre, J. M. Katz, and T. M. Tumpey, “H5N1 and 1918 pandemic influenza virus infection results in early and excessive infiltration of macrophages and neutrophils in the lungs of mice,” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 4, no. 8, Article ID e1000115, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. C. Cilloniz, M. J. Pantin-Jackwood, C. Ni et al., “Lethal dissemination of H5N1 influenza virus is associated with dysregulation of inflammation and lipoxin signaling in a mouse model of infection,” Journal of Virology, vol. 84, no. 15, pp. 7613–7624, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. S. Fukuyama and Y. Kawaoka, “The pathogenesis of influenza virus infections: the contributions of virus and host factors,” Current Opinion in Immunology, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 481–486, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. S. Tasaka, F. Amaya, S. Hashimoto, and A. Ishizaka, “Roles of oxidants and redox signaling in the pathogenesis of acute respiratory distress syndrome,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 739–753, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. K. R. Short, E. J. B. V. Kroeze, R. A. M. Fouchier, and T. Kuiken, “Pathogenesis of influenza-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome,” The Lancet Infectious Diseases, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 57–69, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. Y. Yamada, G. V. Limmon, D. Zheng et al., “Major shifts in the Spatio-Temporal distribution of lung antioxidant enzymes during influenza pneumonia,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 2, Article ID e31494, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. M. Ueda, T. Daidoji, A. Du et al., “Highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza virus induces extracellular Ca2+ influx, leading to apoptosis in avian cells,” Journal of Virology, vol. 84, no. 6, pp. 3068–3078, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. C. P. Baines, R. A. Kaiser, N. H. Purcell et al., “Loss of cyclophilin D reveals a critical role for mitochondrial permeability transition in cell death,” Nature, vol. 434, no. 7033, pp. 658–662, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. D. Han, M. D. Ybanez, S. Ahmadi, K. Yeh, and N. Kaplowitz, “Redox regulation of tumor necrosis factor signaling,” Antioxidants and Redox Signaling, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 2245–2263, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. I. C. C. Low, J. Kang, and S. Pervaiz, “Bcl-2: a prime regulator of mitochondrial redox metabolism in cancer cells,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 2975–2987, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. L. Pauling, Vitamin C and the Common Cold, Freeman Press, San Francisco, Calif, USA, 1970.
  26. S. Lewin, Vitamin C: Its Molecular Biology and Medical Potential, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1976.
  27. J. S. Bland, Vitamin C: The Future is Now (Keats Good Health Guide), McGraw-Hill Press, Columbus, Ohio, USA, 1998.
  28. J. T. A. Ely, “Ascorbic acid role in containment of the world avian flu pandemic,” Experimental Biology and Medicine, vol. 232, no. 7, pp. 847–851, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  29. B. Antus and Z. Kardos, “Oxidative stress in COPD: molecular background and clinical monitoring,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 627–650, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. C. H. Wiegman, C. Michaeloudes, G. Haji et al., “Oxidative stress—induced mitochondrial dysfunction drives inflammation and airway smooth muscle remodeling in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,” The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. F. Q. Schafer and G. R. Buettner, “Redox environment of the cell as viewed through the redox state of the glutathione disulfide/glutathione couple,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 1191–1212, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. J. M. Matés, C. Pérez-Gómez, I. N. De Castro, M. Asenjo, and J. Márquez, “Glutamine and its relationship with intracellular redox status, oxidative stress and cell proliferation/death,” International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 439–458, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. T. Watanabe, M. Tahara, and S. Todo, “The novel antioxidant edaravone: from bench to bedside,” Cardiovascular Therapeutics, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 101–114, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. A. Hishida, “Clinical analysis of 207 patients who developed renal disorders during or after treatment with edaravone reported during post-marketing surveillance,” Clinical and Experimental Nephrology, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 292–296, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. J. B. Schulz, N. A. Di Prospero, and K. Fischbeck, “Clinical experience with high-dose idebenone in Friedreich ataxia,” Journal of Neurology, vol. 256, no. 1, pp. 42–46, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. H. Gutzmann, K.-P. Kühl, D. Hadler, and M. A. Rapp, “Safety and efficacy of idebenone versus tacrine in patients with Alzheimer's disease: results of a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group multicenter study,” Pharmacopsychiatry, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 12–18, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. L. J. Thal, M. Grundman, J. Berg et al., “Idebenone treatment fails to slow cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease,” Neurology, vol. 61, no. 11, pp. 1498–1502, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. T. Meier and G. Buyse, “Idebenone: an emerging therapy for Friedreich ataxia,” Journal of Neurology, vol. 256, supplement 1, pp. 25–30, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. U. Singh and I. Jialal, “Alpha-lipoic acid supplementation and diabetes,” Nutrition Reviews, vol. 66, no. 11, pp. 646–657, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. S. Tesfaye, “Advances in the management of diabetic peripheral neuropathy,” Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 136–143, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. S. Voutilainen, T. Nurmi, J. Mursu, and T. H. Rissanen, “Carotenoids and cardiovascular health,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 83, no. 6, pp. 1265–1271, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  42. N. I. Krinsky and E. J. Johnson, “Carotenoid actions and their relation to health and disease,” Molecular Aspects of Medicine, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 459–516, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. S. K. Osganian, M. J. Stampfer, E. Rimm, D. Spiegelman, J. E. Manson, and W. C. Willett, “Dietary carotenoids and risk of coronary artery disease in women,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 1390–1399, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  44. K. A. Huggins, K. J. Navara, M. T. Mendonça, and G. E. Hill, “Detrimental effects of carotenoid pigments: the dark side of bright coloration,” Naturwissenschaften, vol. 97, no. 7, pp. 637–644, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. M. G. Traber, “Vitamin E regulatory mechanisms,” Annual Review of Nutrition, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 347–362, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. R. Siekmeier, C. Steffen, and W. März, “Role of oxidants and antioxidants in atherosclerosis: results of in vitro and in vivo investigations,” Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 265–282, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. V. A. Kirsh, R. B. Hayes, S. T. Mayne et al., “Supplemental and dietary vitamin E, beta-carotene, and vitamin C intakes and prostate cancer risk,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 245–254, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. S. M. Lippman, E. A. Klein, P. J. Goodman et al., “Effect of selenium and vitamin E on risk of prostate cancer and other cancers: the Selenium and Vitamin E Cancer Prevention Trial (SELECT),” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 301, no. 1, pp. 39–51, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. G. Dallner and P. J. Sindelar, “Regulation of ubiquinone metabolism,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 29, no. 3-4, pp. 285–294, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. U. Singh, S. Devaraj, and I. Jialal, “Coenzyme Q10 supplementation and heart failure,” Nutrition Reviews, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 286–293, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. P. S. Sândor, L. Di Clemente, G. Coppola et al., “Efficacy of coenzyme Q10 in migraine prophylaxis: a randomized controlled trial,” Neurology, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 71–75, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. F. L. Rosenfeldt, S. J. Haas, H. Krum et al., “Coenzyme Q10 in the treatment of hypertension: a meta-analysis of the clinical trials,” Journal of Human Hypertension, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 297–306, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. M. Mancuso, D. Orsucci, L. Volpi, V. Calsolaro, and G. Siciliano, “Coenzyme Q10 in neuromuscular and neurodegenerative disorders,” Current Drug Targets, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 111–121, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. G. F. Kelso, C. M. Porteous, C. V. Coulter et al., “Selective targeting of a redox-active ubiquinone to mitochondria within cells: antioxidant and antiapoptotic properties,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 7, pp. 4588–4596, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. M. F. Ross, G. F. Kelso, F. H. Blaikie et al., “Lipophilic triphenylphosphonium cations as tools in mitochondrial bioenergetics and free radical biology,” Biochemistry, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 222–230, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. R. A. J. Smith, R. C. Hartley, and M. P. Murphy, “Mitochondria-targeted small molecule therapeutics and probes,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 3021–3038, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. E. J. Gane, F. Weilert, D. W. Orr et al., “The mitochondria-targeted anti-oxidant mitoquinone decreases liver damage in a phase II study of hepatitis C patients,” Liver International, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 1019–1026, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. B. J. Snow, F. L. Rolfe, M. M. Lockhart et al., “A double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the mitochondria- targeted antioxidant MitoQ as a disease-modifying therapy in Parkinson's disease,” Movement Disorders, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 1670–1674, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. V. P. Skulachev, V. N. Anisimov, Y. N. Antonenko et al., “An attempt to prevent senescence: a mitochondrial approach,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1787, no. 5, pp. 437–461, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. B. M. Winklhofer-Roob, E. Rock, J. Ribalta, D. H. Shmerling, and J. M. Roob, “Effects of vitamin E and carotenoid status on oxidative stress in health and disease. Evidence obtained from human intervention studies,” Molecular Aspects of Medicine, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 391–402, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. B. Capelli and G. Cysewski, ASTAXANTHIN Natural Astaxanthin: King of the Carotenoids, Cyanotech Corporation, Kailua, Hawaii, USA, 2007.
  62. P. Cusack, N. McMeniman, A. Rabiee, and I. Lean, “Assessment of the effects of supplementation with vitamin E on health and production of feedlot cattle using meta-analysis,” Preventive Veterinary Medicine, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 229–246, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. M. B. Lu, Y. E. Zhang, C. F. Zhao, P. P. Zhou, and L. J. Yu, “Analysis and identification of astaxanthin and its carotenoid precursors from Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous by high-performance liquid chromatography,” Zeitschrift für Naturforschung, vol. 65, no. 7-8, pp. 489–494, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  64. W. Wu, M. B. Lu, and L. J. Yu, “Expression of carotenogenic genes and astaxanthin production in Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous as a function of oxygen tension,” Zeitschrift für Naturforschung, vol. 66, no. 5-6, pp. 283–286, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. Y. Nishida, E. Yamashita, and W. Miki, “Quenching activities of common hydrophilic and lipophilic antioxidants against singlet oxygen using chemiluminescence detection system,” Carotenoid Science, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 16–20, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  66. J. S. Park, H. W. Kim, B. D. Mathison et al., “Astaxanthin uptake in domestic dogs and cats,” Nutrition & Metabolism, vol. 7, no. 1, article 52, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. R. G. Fassett and J. S. Coombes, “Astaxanthin, oxidative stress, inflammation and cardiovascular disease,” Future Cardiology, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 333–342, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. R. G. Fassett and J. S. Coombes, “Astaxanthin in cardiovascular health and disease,” Molecules, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 2030–2048, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. Y. Nakajima, Y. Inokuchi, M. Shimazawa, K. Otsubo, T. Ishibashi, and H. Hara, “Astaxanthin, a dietary carotenoid, protects retinal cells against oxidative stress in-vitro and in mice in-vivo,” The Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, vol. 60, no. 10, pp. 1365–1374, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. S. Piermarocchi, S. Saviano, V. Parisi et al., “Carotenoids in Age-related Maculopathy Italian Study (CARMIS): two-year results of a randomized study,” European Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 216–225, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. N. D'Orazio, M. A. Gammone, E. Gemello, M. De Girolamo, S. Cusenza, and G. Riccioni, “Marine bioactives: pharmacological properties and potential applications against inflammatory diseases,” Marine Drugs, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 812–833, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. S.-J. Lee, S.-K. Bai, K.-S. Lee et al., “Astaxanthin inhibits nitric oxide production and inflammatory gene expression by suppressing IκB kinase-dependent NF-κB activation,” Molecules and Cells, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 97–105, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  73. M. Ishiki, Y. Nishida, H. Ishibashi et al., “Impact of divergent effects of astaxanthin on insulin signaling in L6 cells,” Endocrinology, vol. 154, no. 8, pp. 2600–2612, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. X. Song, B. Wang, S. Lin et al., “Astaxanthin inhibits apoptosis in alveolar epithelial cells type II in vivo and in vitro through the ROS-dependent mitochondrial signalling pathway,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 2198–2212, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. A. P. Bolin, R. C. Macedo, D. P. Marin, M. P. Barros, and R. Otton, “Astaxanthin prevents in vitro auto-oxidative injury in human lymphocytes,” Cell Biology and Toxicology, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 457–467, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. T. Tanaka, H. Makita, M. Ohnishi, H. Mori, K. Satoh, and A. Hara, “Chemoprevention of rat oral carcinogenesis by naturally occurring xanthophylls, astaxanthin and canthaxanthin,” Cancer Research, vol. 55, no. 18, pp. 4059–4064, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  77. Y. Yasui, M. Hosokawa, N. Mikami, K. Miyashita, and T. Tanaka, “Dietary astaxanthin inhibits colitis and colitis-associated colon carcinogenesis in mice via modulation of the inflammatory cytokines,” Chemico-Biological Interactions, vol. 193, no. 1, pp. 79–87, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. T. Tanaka, M. Shnimizu, and H. Moriwaki, “Cancer chemoprevention by carotenoids,” Molecules, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 3202–3242, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. R. Nakao, O. L. Nelson, J. S. Park, B. D. Mathison, P. A. Thompson, and B. P. Chew, “Effect of dietary astaxanthin at different stages of mammary tumor initiation in BALB/c mice,” Anticancer Research, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 2171–2175, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  80. N. M. Lyons and N. M. O'Brien, “Modulatory effects of an algal extract containing astaxanthin on UVA-irradiated cells in culture,” Journal of Dermatological Science, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 73–84, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. M. Santocono, M. Zurria, M. Berrettini, D. Fedeli, and G. Falcioni, “Lutein, zeaxanthin and astaxanthin protect against DNA damage in SK-N-SH human neuroblastoma cells induced by reactive nitrogen species,” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. J.-P. Yuan, J. Peng, K. Yin, and J.-H. Wang, “Potential health-promoting effects of astaxanthin: a high-value carotenoid mostly from microalgae,” Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 150–165, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. P. Kidd, “Astaxanthin, cell membrane nutrient with diverse clinical benefits and anti-aging potential,” Alternative Medicine Review, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 355–364, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  84. P. Nagendraprabhu and G. Sudhandiran, “Astaxanthin inhibits tumor invasion by decreasing extracellular matrix production and induces apoptosis in experimental rat colon carcinogenesis by modulating the expressions of ERK-2, NFkB and COX-2,” Investigational New Drugs, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 207–224, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. P. Palozza, C. Torelli, A. Boninsegna et al., “Growth-inhibitory effects of the astaxanthin-rich alga Haematococcus pluvialis in human colon cancer cells,” Cancer Letters, vol. 283, no. 1, pp. 108–117, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. X.-D. Song, J.-J. Zhang, M.-R. Wang, W.-B. Liu, X.-B. Gu, and C.-J. Lv, “Astaxanthin induces mitochondria-mediated apoptosis in rat hepatocellular carcinoma CBRH-7919 cells,” Biological & Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 839–844, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. X. Song, M. Wang, L. Zhang et al., “Changes in cell ultrastructure and inhibition of JAK1/STAT3 signaling pathway in CBRH-7919 cells with astaxanthin,” Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 679–686, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. H. McNulty, R. F. Jacob, and R. P. Mason, “Biologic activity of carotenoids related to distinct membrane physicochemical interactions,” The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 101, no. 10, pp. S20–S29, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. A. V. Kozlov, D. I. Egorov, I. A. Vladimirov, and O. A. Azizova, “Formation of iron complexes with ascorbic acid in physiological conditions in vitro and in tissue in vivo,” Biofizika, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 513–517, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  90. H.-S. Kim, M. J. Quon, and J.-A. Kim, “New insights into the mechanisms of polyphenols beyond antioxidant properties; lessons from the green tea polyphenol, epigallocatechin 3-gallate,” Redox Biology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 187–195, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. J. Choi, “Oxidative stress, endogenous antioxidants, alcohol, and hepatitis C: pathogenic interactions and therapeutic considerations,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 1135–1150, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. D. P. Vivekananthan, M. S. Penn, S. K. Sapp, A. Hsu, and E. J. Topol, “Use of antioxidant vitamins for the prevention of cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis of randomised trials,” The Lancet, vol. 361, no. 9374, pp. 2017–2023, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. A. Shuaib, K. R. Lees, P. Lyden et al., “NXY-059 for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 357, no. 6, pp. 562–571, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. H. M. Cochemé and M. P. Murphy, “Can antioxidants be effective therapeutics?” Current Opinion in Investigational Drugs, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 426–431, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  95. O. Firuzi, R. Miri, M. Tavakkoli, and L. Saso, “Antioxidant therapy: current status and future prospects,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 18, no. 25, pp. 3871–3888, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. J. D. Watson, “Type 2 diabetes as a redox disease,” The Lancet, vol. 383, no. 9919, pp. 841–843, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. S. K. Powers and M. J. Jackson, “Exercise-induced oxidative stress: cellular mechanisms and impact on muscle force production,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 1243–1276, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. M. Ristow, K. Zarse, A. Oberbach et al., “Antioxidants prevent health-promoting effects of physical exercise in humans,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 21, pp. 8665–8670, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. A. Martin-Montalvo, E. M. Mercken, S. J. Mitchell et al., “Metformin improves health span and lifespan in mice,” Nature Communications, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 2192, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  100. G. Nardai, K. Stadler, E. Papp, T. Korcsmáros, J. Jakus, and P. Csermely, “Diabetic changes in the redox status of the microsomal protein folding machinery,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 334, no. 3, pp. 787–795, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  101. J. C. Smith, K. A. Nielson, P. Antuono et al., “Semantic memory functional mri and cognitive function after exercise intervention in mild cognitive impairment,” Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 197–215, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  102. A. Sujak, “Interactions between canthaxanthin and lipid membranes—possible mechanisms of canthaxanthin toxicity,” Cellular and Molecular Biology Letters, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 395–410, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  103. R. Goralczyk, “Beta-carotene and lung cancer in smokers: review of hypotheses and status of research,” Nutrition and Cancer, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 767–774, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  104. M.-F. Chen, C.-M. Yang, C.-M. Su, J.-W. Liao, and M.-L. Hu, “Inhibitory effect of vitamin C in combination with vitamin K3 on tumor growth and metastasis of Lewis lung carcinoma xenografted in C57BL/6 mice,” Nutrition and Cancer, vol. 63, no. 7, pp. 1036–1043, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  105. P. Chen, J. Stone, G. Sullivan, J. A. Drisko, and Q. Chen, “Anti-cancer effect of pharmacologic ascorbate and its interaction with supplementary parenteral glutathione in preclinical cancer models,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 681–687, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  106. M. G. Traber and J. F. Stevens, “Vitamins C and E: beneficial effects from a mechanistic perspective,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 1000–1013, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  107. N. J. White, R. G. Webster, E. A. Govorkova, and T. M. Uyeki, “What is the optimal therapy for patients with H5N1 influenza?” PLoS Medicine, vol. 6, no. 6, Article ID e1000091, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 Zhong-Wei Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

2898 Views | 1104 Downloads | 21 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder