Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity / 2018 / Article
Special Issue

From Regulated Cell Death to Adaptive Stress Strategies: Convergence and Divergence in Eukaryotic Cells

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 |Article ID 5473817 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5473817

Michael R. Yeaman, Sabrina Büttner, Karin Thevissen, "Regulated Cell Death as a Therapeutic Target for Novel Antifungal Peptides and Biologics", Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2018, Article ID 5473817, 20 pages, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5473817

Regulated Cell Death as a Therapeutic Target for Novel Antifungal Peptides and Biologics

Academic Editor: Alessandra Ricelli
Received13 Dec 2017
Accepted07 Mar 2018
Published26 Apr 2018


The rise of microbial pathogens refractory to conventional antibiotics represents one of the most urgent and global public health concerns for the 21st century. Emergence of Candida auris isolates and the persistence of invasive mold infections that resist existing treatment and cause severe illness has underscored the threat of drug-resistant fungal infections. To meet these growing challenges, mechanistically novel agents and strategies are needed that surpass the conventional fungistatic or fungicidal drug actions. Host defense peptides have long been misunderstood as indiscriminant membrane detergents. However, evidence gathered over the past decade clearly points to their sophisticated and selective mechanisms of action, including exploiting regulated cell death pathways of their target pathogens. Such peptides perturb transmembrane potential and mitochondrial energetics, inducing phosphatidylserine accessibility and metacaspase activation in fungi. These mechanisms are often multimodal, affording target pathogens fewer resistance options as compared to traditional small molecule drugs. Here, recent advances in the field are examined regarding regulated cell death subroutines as potential therapeutic targets for innovative anti-infective peptides against pathogenic fungi. Furthering knowledge of protective host defense peptide interactions with target pathogens is key to advancing and applying novel prophylactic and therapeutic countermeasures to fungal resistance and pathogenesis.

1. Significance of Fungal Infections

1.1. Medical Burden of Fungal Infection

In the last two decades, Candida species have emerged as the third most common pathogen of nosocomial septicemia, accounting for 5–10% of all hospital-acquired bloodstream infections [13]. Overall incidence of candidemia now surpasses incidences of bacteremia due to Escherichia coli or Klebsiella species [4, 5]. Furthermore, Candida species are the most common cause of deep-seated fungal infections in patients who have extensive burns [6] or have undergone transplantation [79]. Additionally, Candida species are among the most common causes of catheter-related fungal infections [10]. Despite modest advances in antifungal therapy, attributable mortality of candidemia remains approximately 40% [11]. The emergence of highly antifungal-resistant species such as C. auris compounds these concerns [12]. Likewise, life-threatening infections caused by Aspergillus, Rhizopus, and Mucor species are seen with increasing incidence as the numbers of patients having immunosuppression in settings of hematopoietic or solid organ transplant, cytotoxic cancer chemotherapy, and related conditions increase [13, 14]. Collectively, these fungal infections have unacceptably high mortality rates that may exceed 50%, even with gold-standard antifungal therapy.

1.2. Urgent Need for Innovative Solutions

Convergence of increasing populations at risk of serious fungal infections, emerging resistance to conventional antifungal agents, and a paucity of development of mechanistically novel antifungal therapeutics portends a significant public health concern.

1.2.1. Burgeoning Populations at Risk

Populations of individuals at risk of severe fungal infections are rapidly expanding in scope and number worldwide and are related to several trends with respect to the global population demographics, including the following:

(1) Aging. Immune waning and senescence have significant negative impacts on host defense against infection [15, 16]. Infection is now the attributable cause of mortality in nearly one-third of all individuals aged 65 years or older [17]. Estimates project that by 2050, the number of persons ≥ 65 years of age will reach 1.5 billion, and those aged ≥ 80 years will reach 395 million [18, 19]. Thus, along with risk factors imposed by age-related comorbidities, the growing cohort of aging individuals portends significant increases in opportunistic and pathogenic fungal infections.

(2) Cancer. Infection is a significant risk factor for morbidity in cancer patients and is a leading cause of attributable death in malignancy [16]. Beyond systemic impacts due to cancer itself, cytotoxic chemotherapy renders patients functionally immunosuppressed, thereby affecting key cell-mediated effectors such as granulocytes and macrophages [20]. Further, hospitalization, long-term in-dwelling catheterization, and chronic exposure to antibiotics enhance their risks of fungal infection [21]. Projections by the World Health Organization and others estimate a dramatic increase in cancer incidence and prevalence in the next two decades [22].

(3) Surgery. With other healthcare-associated risk factors, infections due to surgical procedures are rising in incidence and associated with worse outcomes [23]. Moreover, obesity, diabetes, smoking, hypertension, coronary artery disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [24] are pre and postsurgical risks of infection. Compounding this issue is the wide use of broad-spectrum antibiotic prophylaxis in relation to surgery, which together with immune suppression can increase risks for opportunistic fungal infections.

(4) Transplant. Successful transplantation almost always requires prolonged or even life-long immune suppressive therapy. It follows that infectious complications remain a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in settings of organ or hematologic transplantation [25]. Opportunistic fungal pathogens are among the most dangerous etiologies of these infections and can emerge when the host is rendered immunocompromised by regimens necessary for engraftment. In part due to the rise of antifungal resistance, opportunistic fungal infections are increasingly common in transplantation [26].

(5) Autoimmunity. Autoimmune diseases affect 5–10% of the population worldwide [27], translating to hundreds of millions of lives impacted. Autoimmune diseases are burgeoning globally [28], and as a group are equivalent in prevalence to heart disease, and twice that of cancer [29, 30]. Immune-modifying therapies used to treat autoimmune diseases have significant risks for life-threatening infection, including those caused by opportunistic and pathogenic fungi [31, 32].

1.2.2. Resistance to Existing Antimycotics

Fungal infections are often difficult to treat for several reasons: (1) few selective targets in these eukaryotic pathogens as compared to the human host; (2) increasing resistance to conventional antifungal agents which have advanced little in the past 50 years; and (3) the lack of mechanistically novel antifungal agents developed for clinical application. As a result, an additional concern is the emergence of resistance to antifungal agents, which are commonly used to prevent and treat disseminated candidiasis. Azole-resistant Candida strains are being isolated with increasing frequency, even in patients without AIDS [1, 2]. Although a limited number of antifungal drugs have been developed, experience with antibacterial agents predicts that resistance to novel antifungal drugs will emerge as their use increases [33]. Multiple factors have led to the continuous increase of reported antifungal resistance in the laboratory and in clinical failures due to resistance in human infection. For example, the fact that with few exceptions, the antifungal agents used in clinical medicine today are largely the same as those used for the prior several decades. Thus, as is the case for antibacterial resistance, exposing countless generations of fungal organisms to such agents necessarily affords a survival advantage to those pathogens capable of resistance. Key themes of concern include Candida parapsilosis, C. krusei, and C. glabrata clinical isolates that routinely exhibit reduced susceptibility to multiple antifungal agents [12]. While perhaps less common in incidence than infections due to C. albicans, these fungal pathogens can often represent serious or life-threatening bloodstream and invasive infections. Moreover, the advent of pan-resistant species of Candida, such as C. auris, is among the most significant public health concerns related to fungal infections in recent memory [12]. In addition, infections due to opportunistic or pathogenic molds remain an urgent issue. Infections caused by Aspergillus, Rhizopus, Mucor, and related molds are angioinvasive and destructive, often leading to necrotic and irreversible tissue damage. Infections caused by these Mucoromycotina, and those due to Cryptococcus, are typically treated with cytotoxic levels of amphotericin B and typically resist less toxic azoles or echinocandins [33]. Echinocandins are the newest class of antifungals introduced for human therapy in the last decade. However, recent development of echinocandin resistance has been reported via point mutations in FKS genes that encode the echinocandin targets (reviewed in [34]), supporting the urgent need to identify novel antifungal agents.

1.2.3. Paucity of Antifungal Development

Amphotericin B was originally discovered in the 1950s, and has been used clinical to treat fungal infections for approximately 50 years. Over that same span of time, remarkable few mechanistically novel antifungal compounds have reached regulatory approval for clinical use. These include 5-flucytosine (1963), the azoles fluconazole (1990) and voriconazole (2002), and the echinocandin caspofungin (2003), posoconazole (2006), and anidulafungin (2007) [33]. Thus, the pharmacopeia of approved antifungal agents for bloodstream or other invasive infections is essentially encompassed by just three mechanistic classes: polyenes, azoles, and echinocandins. While echinocandins are technically considered to have cyclic-peptide-like structures, the scope of the discussion herein focuses on noncyclic host defense and synthetic peptide compounds. Likewise, the many factors contributing to a significant reduction of industry investment in developing novel antifungal agents is beyond the scope of this discussion. Suffice it to say there is now an urgent need to discover and develop structurally and mechanistically new antifungal agents to meet the growing threat of life-threatening infections due to these pathogens.

2. Regulated Cell Death in Fungi

An important new area of discovery with great potential to reveal conceptually as well as mechanistically novel targets for next-generation antifungal therapeutics is regulated cell death (RCD), previously referred to as programmed cell death (PCD). For the last two decades, the occurrence of RCD in unicellular eukaryotes has been a topic of intensive study, and fungi have been shown to succumb to several distinct subroutines of regulated cell death. The majority of these studies have been carried out in the well-established model system Saccharomyces cerevisiae. According to the classification of cell death modalities suggested by the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2018 and the recent guidelines for cell death nomenclature in yeast [35, 36], S. cerevisiae and likely other fungi can undergo at least three distinct types of RCD: intrinsic apoptosis (formerly type I PCD), autophagic cell death (formerly type II PCD), and regulated necrosis (formerly type III PCD). While considerable efforts have historically been focused on gaining a greater mechanistic and biological understanding of these RCD pathways in S. cerevisiae, recent studies have also provided new insights into RCD in human pathogenic fungi, including Candida and Aspergillus species. Here, we summarize the basic concepts and significant advances in this regard.

2.1. Biological Roles of Regulated Cell Death in Fungi

The signals, mechanisms, and pathways through which eukaryotic cells functionally age, wane, and ultimately meet death is equally important to their origin, development, and maturation. Thus, RCD has evolved as a means for populations of cells to most efficiently—and least disruptively—censor those individual cells that either do not actively contribute to the larger microbial community or that detract from it. Example settings in which RCD is particularly meaningful in this regard include reproduction, establishment of colonies, quorum sensing and metastatic dissemination from existing colonies or abscesses, biofilm maturation and survival in the face of antifungal agents, and many other processes necessary for survival and pathogenesis. Thus, there is sound rationale supporting fungal RCD as an innovative and mechanistically novel target of next generation antifungal therapeutics.

While the sense of an apoptotic program in unicellular organisms might not be as obvious as in metazoans, emerging data depict scenarios in which the death of damaged or old cells favors the survival of a clonal population [37]. RCD has been shown to occur during physiological scenarios such as unsuccessful mating [38], differentiation of a yeast colony [39], or replicative and chronological aging [4042]. While replicative aging refers to the number of cell divisions an individual mother cell can undergo, chronological aging reflects the time nondividing cells stay viable in stationary phase. In both aging scenarios, apoptosis serves the elimination of cells that may be old, irreversibly injured, or which have dysfunctions that are detrimental to the larger fungal cell population. Aside from this, the apoptotic program can also be hijacked by competing fungal populations, for example via secretion of killer toxins that trigger cell death in susceptible strains [43].

In aggregate, the RCD subroutines can be induced by a plethora of different stimuli and scenarios, ranging from signaling molecules necessary for survival and reproduction to existing environmental and host threats, including antifungal agents. The relative dependence on distinct molecular players and events for activation of specific RCD pathways appears to be subject to conditional contexts in which the organism encounters a specific stress signal [44]. Based on their molecular and biochemical characteristics, the apoptotic mode of cell death has been subdivided into extrinsic and intrinsic apoptosis [35]. While extrinsic apoptosis is initiated by activation of specific transmembrane receptors that subsequently trigger cellular demise, intrinsic apoptosis can be induced by a variety of cellular stresses that all converge on mitochondria-mediated cell death processes. While yeast does most probably not succumb to the typical extrinsic apoptosis, intrinsic apoptosis does exist and represents the best studied RCD scenario in yeast so far. Morphologically, this mode of cell death is characterized by hallmark features, including systematic DNA fragmentation, nuclear condensation, exposure of phosphatidylserine at the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane, and accumulation of reactive oxygen species.

The fundamental molecular machinery governing apoptotic cell death appears to be evolutionary conserved, and numerous counterparts of mammalian key effectors of apoptosis have been identified in yeast in the past two decades [4547]. For instance, these include orthologues of the apoptosis-inducing factor (Aif1) and Endonuclease G (Nuc1). When released from mitochondria upon an apoptotic insult and translocation to the nucleus, they cause DNA fragmentation and subsequent cell death [48, 49]. For Endonuclease G, this process involves the mitochondrial adenine translocator, implying the formation and actuation of a mitochondrial permeability transition pore in yeast apoptosis [48].

Mitochondrial features such as hyperpolarization, oxidative burst and generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), dissipation of mitochondrial transmembrane potential, release of cytochrome C, loss of cytochrome C oxidase activity, or mitochondrial fragmentation have all been shown to contribute to apoptotic death to varying extents depending on respective triggers and scenarios [50]. Even so, variations on these themes have been observed among differing fungal organisms, including opportunistic yeast and pathogenic fungi, as discussed below.

2.2. Regulated Cell Death Subroutines in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Although S. cerevisiae is not a typical human pathogen, the emergence of opportunistic S. cerevisiae infections has been reported in patients with chronic disease, cancer, and immunosuppression [51]. Moreover, considerable insights into RCD have been gained through studies using this organism as a model. The following discussion considers the genetic and mechanistic aspects of RCD in S. cerevisiae in this light, particularly given many of the RCD determinants and pathways have homologous systems in high priority human pathogens, including Candida species and pathogenic molds.

2.2.1. Intrinsic Apoptosis (Type I PCD)

Intrinsic apoptosis is perhaps the most well-known of RCD pathways, through which cellular constituents are systematically degraded by caspase-dependent or -independent mechanisms. Comparable to mammalian intrinsic apoptosis, apoptosis in yeast is accompanied by release of cytochrome C from mitochondria, thus impairing oxidative phosphorylation. However, the participation of cytosolic cytochrome C in the formation of apoptosomes, as is observed in mammalian cells, has not yet been demonstrated in yeast.

To date, one orthologue of mammalian caspases has been identified in S. cerevisiae: the metacaspase Yca1 (alias Mca1) [52]. Despite different cleavage specificities of caspases (targeting aspartate-X dyads) and metacaspases (targeting lysine-X or arginine-X dyads), these proteases share a common evolutionary origin and are integral to cell death execution. Notably, the protein TSN (Tudor staphylococcal nuclease) has been established as the first common substrate of caspases and metacaspases, arguing for stringent functional conservation despite phylogenetic distance [53]. Approximately 40% of the apoptotic scenarios investigated in S. cerevisiae to date depend at least in part on the presence of Yca1 as executor of cellular destruction [54]. The fact that caspase-like activities have been detected even in cells lacking Yca1 indicates that additional proteases with caspase-like activity contribute to RCD in yeast [55]. One such protease may be the separin Esp1, a highly conserved protease that facilitates sister chromatid separation during metaphase to anaphase transition via cleavage of Scc1 (alias Mcd1), a subunit of the cohesion complex [56]. Esp1 belongs to the CD clan (superfamily) of cysteine proteases, a group of proteases that also includes caspases, transamidases, and bacterial gingipains [56]. During hydrogen peroxide-induced apoptosis, cleavage of Scc1 by Esp1 yields a C-terminal Scc1-fragment that relocalizes from the nucleus to the mitochondria, causing the dissipation of mitochondrial transmembrane potential, cytochrome C release, and cell death [57]. Several additional proteases have been associated with yeast apoptosis. Among these, the HtrA2/Omi-orthologous serine protease Nma111 is involved in oxidative stress-induced cell death [58] and responsible for the proapoptotic cleavage of the yeast inhibitor-of-apoptosis protein Bir1 [59]. Likewise, the serine carboxypeptidase Kex1 is involved in cell death execution upon treatment with hypochlorite and acetic acid as well as defects in N-glycosylation [60, 61].

Numerous endogenous and exogenous triggers have been reported to initiate intrinsic apoptotic cell death pathways in yeast, through metacaspase-dependent as well as metacaspase-independent pathways [4547]. Among the endogenous triggers are for instance DNA damage and replication stress [62], defects in N-glycosylation [61], chronological or replicative aging [41, 42], perturbations in cytoskeleton dynamics [63], and impaired mRNA stability [64]. Likewise, a diverse set of exogenous stimuli for yeast apoptosis has been identified, including treatment with low doses of acetic acid and hydrogen peroxide, hyperosmotic stress, heat, high salt concentrations, UV irradiation, heavy metals such as iron, copper, and manganese, ceramide, amiodarone, aspirin, diverse antitumor agents, and many more [45, 46, 65]. Relevant to pathogenesis, specific host defense factors have been shown to act via induction of the intrinsic pathway of apoptosis in various fungi, including S. cerevisiae. For instance, peptides from the dermaseptin family produced by amphibians trigger Aif1-dependent apoptosis [66], and the plant-derived defense peptide osmotin kills by activation of Ras-dependent apoptosis [67]. Interestingly, this mode of cell death requires the binding of osmotin to the plasma membrane receptor Pho36 and might thus constitute a variant of extrinsic apoptosis (also see Section (4), below).

Homologues of mammalian proteins integral to the mitochondrial pathway of intrinsic apoptosis have been shown to be functional in yeast and to act through conserved cell death machinery. For instance, heterologous expression of the human proapoptotic protein Bax in yeast causes outer mitochondrial membrane permeabilization, cytochrome C release, and cell death [45]. Simultaneous heterologous expression of the human antiapoptotic regulators Bcl-2 or Bcl-XL prevents Bax-induced death and enhances yeast resistance to the apoptotic stimuli H2O2 and acetic acid [50]. Thus, the intrinsic pathway of apoptosis in yeast can be complemented by human or other mammalian homologues, again highlighting the functional conservation of the apoptotic program.

2.2.2. Autophagic Cell Death (Type II PCD)

Autophagy represents the degradation pathway in eukaryotic cells through which the bulk of intracellular molecular turnover occurs, including breakdown of a wide range of cytoplasmic material such as aggregated proteins, organelles, and in some cases, pathogen determinants. During macroautophagy, cargo destined for degradation is sequestered into double-membraned vesicles termed autophagosomes and targeted to the vacuole for subsequent degradation and recycling. Discovered more than half a century ago, autophagy is now recognized as a catabolic process required for the coordinated regulation of cell development, infection control, aging, and other physiological and pathophysiological fates, including cell death. Similar to other RCD subroutines, the fundamental autophagic mechanisms and molecules are conserved across the evolutionary spectrum from microbes to man. Indeed, most of the autophagy-related (ATG) genes and pathways have been identified and characterized in yeast cells under nutrient limiting and other stress conditions [68, 69]. While autophagy mostly represents a prosurvival and longevity-ensuring program, excessive autophagy can also contribute to cell death, in particular during development [70]. Autophagic cell death is characterized by increased numbers of autophagosomes along with aberrant protein and organelle turnover. Evidence suggests that autophagic cell death occurs in yeast cells, but the precise contribution of distinct autophagic processes to cell death execution is relatively unexplored [46]. Even so, data supporting this concept are emerging. Heterologous expression of mammalian p53 in yeast causes cell death accompanied by an upregulation of autophagy, and deletion of ATG1 and ATG5 partly restores survival [71]. In addition, selective leucine starvation causes a mode of death that requires the presence of essential autophagy regulators such as Atg8 [72]. Indications for an involvement of excessive autophagy targeting mitochondria (mitophagy) derive from studies showing that cells lacking the mitophagy regulator Uth1 are no longer susceptible to cell death induced by expression of mammalian Bax [73]. However, as Bax also causes mitochondria-mediated apoptosis in yeast, the precise contributions of mitophagy to Bax-mediated yeast cell death requires further investigation.

2.2.3. Regulated Necrosis (Type III PCD)

Historically, necrosis has been predominantly considered to represent a purely coincidental mode of cell death upon extreme, biochemical, immunological, or mechanical insult that results in membrane rupture, swelling of organelles, and indiscriminant spilling of cell content into its surroundings. In recent years, a more specific view of necrosis has emerged, representing a more fine-tuned and regulated mechanism with implications in inflammatory responses in a variety of physiological conditions [74, 75]. In mammalian cells, the cascade of molecular events and signaling pathways that ultimately leads to necrotic RCD often involves proteases such as calpains and cathepsins, as well as the kinases RIP1 and RIP3 [74]. While most of our knowledge of regulated necrosis comes from mammalian systems, studies demonstrating this form of RCD existing in yeast have been published [76]. During chronological aging, a portion of dying cells exhibit typical hallmarks of necrosis, including loss of membrane integrity and nucleocytosolic redistribution of Nhp6A, the yeast counterpart of mammalian high mobility group box-1 protein HMGB1 [77]. This necrotic, age-associated cell death is inhibited by spermidine, a natural polyamine whose levels decline during the aging process. Spermidine inhibits cell death via an epigenetic process that involves histone H3 deacetylation and induction of autophagy. Thus, the ability of distinct pharmacological and genetic interventions to modulate this process argues that necrotic cell death is highly regulated. In this respect, deletion of distinct histone acetyltransferases blocks regulated necrosis as well [77]. Furthermore, peroxisomal function, perturbation of vacuolar function, and pH homeostasis as well as excess palmitoleic acid and elevated levels of free fatty acids have been associated with regulated necrotic cell death [7882]. In counterbalance, high levels of the vacuolar protease Pep4, the yeast orthologue of mammalian cathepsin D, prevent both apoptotic and necrotic death during yeast chronological aging. Notably, the inhibition of apoptosis requires the proteolytic activity of native Pep4, while the suppression of necrosis is facilitated by the short propeptide version of Pep4 [83].

2.3. Regulated Cell Death in Candida Species

Candida albicans represents the main model system to study fungal pathogenicity and virulence, and RCD of C. albicans has been observed upon exposure to various antifungals and other stressors (Figure 1). Candida species have been shown to undergo RCD with typical characteristics of intrinsic apoptosis, whereas other forms of RCD such as autophagic cell death and regulated necrosis remain largely unexplored in this organism [84]. Among the triggers for such apoptotic pathways are for instance acetic acid and hydrogen peroxide [85], antifungal peptides from plants [86, 87], and other sources [88, 89], as well as a variety of botanicals such as perillaldehyde, honokiol, baicalin, and cinnamaldehyde [9093]. In addition, clinical antifungal agents, including caspofungin and micafungin, two echinocandins that disturb cell wall biogenesis, can promote RCD in C. albicans [94, 95]. In most of these scenarios, apoptotic death of Candida is accompanied by an accumulation of reactive oxygen species and mitochondrial dysfunction [91, 92, 96].

As in S. cerevisiae, one metacaspase (Mca1) has been identified in C. albicans to date, and Mca1-dependent as well as -independent apoptotic cell death scenarios have been detected [84]. C. albicans cells lacking Mca1 are more resistant to oxidative stress-induced cell death than parental organisms [97]. Of note, increased caspase activity has been observed in relation to induction of apoptosis in C. albicans exposed to other stimuli, for instance the quorum sensing molecule farnesol [98, 99], the plant-derived macrocyclic bisbibenzyl plagiochin E [96] or silibinin [100]. In contrast, cell death resulting from caspofungin is executed through a Mca1-independent manner but instead requires Aif1 [94, 101].

Amphotericin B, an antifungal agent in clinical use for more than 30 years, triggers apoptotic death of C. albicans [85, 102] and inhibits biofilm formation of C. albicans, C. krusei, and C. parapsilosis [103]. Its fungicidal effects are accompanied by increased caspase activities, and concomitant exposure to caspase inhibitors provides cytoprotection. Interestingly, simultaneous pharmacological inhibition of histone deacetylation enhances amphotericin B-induced apoptosis of established Candida biofilms [103]. Furthermore, earlier studies connected apoptotic death in C. albicans to increased Ras signaling [104] and defects in glutathione synthesis [105]. More recently, human lactoferrin has been reported to induce apoptosis in C. albicans via binding and inhibition of the plasma membrane H+-ATPase Pma1, which eventually results in disturbed ion homeostasis, mitochondrial dysfunction, and death [106]. Moreover, host cells seem to be able to utilize the apoptotic program of fungal pathogens as a defense system. For example, interaction with macrophages induces metacaspase activation and apoptosis in C. albicans [107]. In this process, distinct metacaspase substrates involved in glycolysis and protein quality control were decreased [107].

It should be understood that a given fungal organism may employ distinct apoptotic pathways, depending on multiple factors in context. For example, cell density may affect nutritional availability or activate quorum sensing pathways leading to apoptosis [108]. Thus, the effects of farnesol or other signals with respect to quorum sensing, biofilm formation, and cell death may vary depending on the microenvironmental conditions in context of infection and the strategies of fungal growth characteristics therein (e.g., yeast versus hyphae).

2.4. Regulated Cell Death in Pathogenic Molds

Compared to Saccharomyces or Candida species, less is known regarding RCD in Aspergillus species (Ascomycetes) or their Mucoromycotina cousins, Rhizopus or Mucor. However, recent data point to parallels in RCD among pathogenic fungi. Farnesol-induced quorum-sensing mechanisms may exist in Aspergillus, ultimately yielding RCD [109]. For example, in A. nidulans, farnesol induces the expression of an apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF-) like mitochondrial oxidoreductase, mitochondrial ATPase inhibitor, and cytochrome C peroxidase. As a result, ROS accumulation and mitochondrial fragmentation is observed, consistent with a process of caspase-independent apoptosis in this organism. Early studies also suggest that Mucor species have explicit RCD responses to stress. For instance, the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor lovastatin can inhibit posttranslational modification of proteins, including prenylation. Following exposure to lovastatin, M. racemosus arrested sporangiospore germination, yielding profound cytoplasmic condensation and DNA fragmentation [110]. More recent studies reported that specific sesterterpene-type metabolites, including ophiobolins A and B, can induce apoptosis in Mucor species [111]. The calcineurin pathway governs key virulence and antifungal resistance pathways in Rhizopus as well as in other pathogenic molds such as Mucor. Interestingly, when exposed to the calcineurin inhibitor tacrolimus, the fungistatic triazole agents posaconazole and itraconazole became fungicidal for R. oryzae [112]. This effect was accompanied by DNA fragmentation, phosphatidylserine externalization, ROS accumulation, and activation of caspase-like functions. From these examples, there is considerable evidence supporting the view that caspase-dependent and -independent pathways of RCD exist in pathogenic molds and yeasts.

3. Regulated Cell Death as an Antifungal Peptide Target

Host defense peptides (HDPs) of different structural scaffolds occurring naturally or engineered have now been shown to activate fungal RCD by way of key mechanisms, including perturbation of quorum sensing, mitochondrial function, autophagy or mitophagy, disruption of replication or reproductive mechanisms, and/or interference with cell cycle and aging. A particularly attractive aspect of targeting RCD in developing novel antifungal agents relates to the potential minimization of unintended consequences of inflammation that may accompany death of fungal cells exposed to cytotoxic agents that induce unregulated necrotic death. The following discussion focuses on selected examples from recent studies that offer insights into the RCD-inducing mechanisms of host defense peptides and how they might be exploited as novel antifungal agents and strategies. Recent and prior evidence is considered from studies of RCD mechanisms differentially induced by distinctive classes of antifungal HDPs (summarized in Table 1).

Main classes of RCD-inducing antifungal peptides
NameSourceMode of action apart from RCD induction and mitochondrial dysfunction

A. Helical and extended peptides
 Periplanetasin-2Cockroach (Periplaneta americana)Lipid peroxidation, caspase activation
Class Chilopoda
Metacaspase activation
 LactoferrinBovine/humanMetacaspase activation, inhibition of membrane H+-ATPase Pma1

B. γ–core containing peptides
 Plant defensin RsAFP2Radish (Raphanus sativus)Interaction with fungal-specific glucosylceramide, induction of cell wall stress, ceramide accumulation, septin mislocalization, metacaspase independent
 Plant defensin HsAFP1Coral bell (Heuchera sanguinea)Interaction with PA and PI phospholipids, accumulation at buds and septa, internalization, pH dependent activity in vitro
 Plant defensin-like peptide ApDef-1Adenanthera pavoninaCell cycle dysfunction, metacaspase activation
 Insect defensin CoprisinDung beetle Family ScarabaeoideaDysfunctional mitochondrial Δψ and cytochrome C release
 Fungal defensin-like peptide NFAPNeosartorya fischeriCell wall dysfunction, accumulation of nuclei at broken hyphal tips
 Fungal defensin-like peptide AFPAspergillus giganteusCell wall perturbation
 Neutrophil defensin hNP-1HumanMembrane permeabilization and depolarization
 Beta defensin hβD-2HumanRCD modulated by Bcr1 and Ssd1 proteins in C. albicans
 Kinocidins (e.g., CXCL4, CXCL8)MammalianPerturb membrane energetics and inhibit macromolecular synthesis; pH-related activity in vitro; RCD modulated by Bcr1 and Ssd1 proteins in C. albicans

Note that Histatin-5 and plant defensin-like peptide LpDef1 were not integrated in the table as their potential induction of RCD is still under investigation.
3.1. Helical and Extended Peptides

Perhaps the most widely recognized structural class of peptides having antifungal activity are those exhibiting α–helical or extended structures. Examples of this group of molecules for which evidence of RCD has been reported are discussed below.

3.1.1. Periplanetasin-2

This peptide has recently been isolated from the cockroach Periplaneta americana and studied in terms of its mechanism of action against C. albicans [113]. The synthetic amide version of the peptide led to lipid peroxidation, accumulation of ROS, externalization of phosphatidylserine, dissipation of Δψ, and loss of cytochrome C from mitochondria, with activation of caspases, DNA fragmentation, and eventual cell death. Therefore, by inducing insurmountable oxidative stress, it appears that periplanetasin-2 evokes intrinsic apoptosis in C. albicans.

3.1.2. Scolopendin

Scolopendins are recently identified antimicrobial peptides of centipedes [89]. A prototype scolopendin was found to induce apoptosis in C. albicans, as evidenced by mitochondrial dysfunction, ROS accumulation, cytochrome C release, deenergization, phosphatidylserine externalization, chromatin condensation and fragmentation, and cell death. These RCD mechanisms were associated with metacaspase activation.

3.1.3. Lactoferrin

Lactoferrin is one of the most extensively studied HDPs. In early work, Andres et al. showed that this peptide induces apoptotic cell death in C. albicans via K+ channel-mediated K+ efflux [114]. More recently, this same group has shown lactoferrin to induce apoptosis by inhibiting the membrane H+-ATPase Pma1, leading to subsequent mitochondrial dysfunction [106]. Interestingly, Yount et al. previously noted that toxicity of human beta-defensin 2 (hβD-2) and crotamine toxin corresponded to common structure-activity relationships promoting targeting of eukaryotic K+ channels, including that of C. albicans [115]. Human lactoferrin has also been found to trigger caspase-dependent cell death in Saccharomyces [116].

3.1.4. Histatin-5

It remains unclear whether the antifungal peptide histatin-5, found in human saliva and oral secretions, induces apoptosis in C. albicans. Investigations by Vylkova et al. showed that histatin-5 evokes osmotic stress responses [117], and ensuing studies by Sun et al. demonstrated it to perturb ATPase functions in C. albicans [118]. Prior to those studies, Helmerhorst et al. demonstrated that histatin-5 exerts its antifungal activity through the formation of reactive oxygen species [119] and also showed histatin-5 to target fungal energetic systems and to cause mitochondrial dysfunction [120]. Collectively, such findings strongly implied RCD-like mechanisms. However, studies by Wunder et al. reported that histatin-5 does not exert its antifungal mechanisms via apoptosis [121].

3.2. γ–Core Peptides

Cysteine-stabilized (CS) HDPs across the phylogenetic continuum share a 12–18 residue multidimensional structure-function feature known as the γ–core [115, 122]. While this structure-function signature is conserved across a vast evolutionary distance, accessory sequences have adapted to optimize functions in distinct host anatomic and microbiologic niches. For instance, this fundamental motif is conserved in peptides of the defensin, CSαβ, and many other distinct peptide families originating from bacteria, fungi, plants, insects, and humans [123], but the accessory domains have undergone evolutionary radiation. Examples of apoptosis-inducing γ–core peptides that have antifungal efficacy are considered below.

3.2.1. Plant Defensins RsAFP2 and HsAFP1

As with all defensin-family polypeptides of plants, RsAFP1, RsAFP2, and HsAFP1 are cysteine-stabilized, cationic peptides containing a multidimensional γ–core motif [122, 124]. Plant defensins are in general characterized by broad-spectrum antifungal activity and typically have minimal toxicity to plant or human cells in vitro [125]. Originating from the common radish plant family member Raphanus sativus and the coral bell Heuchera sanguinea, the respective plant defensins RsAFP2 and HsAFP1 are models for studying apoptotic mechanisms of action versus C. albicans. Aerts et al. were perhaps the first to demonstrate that a plant defensin (RsAFP2) can induce intrinsic apoptosis in C. albicans, independent of the metacaspase Mca1 [86]. This observation was followed by a report on the induction of apoptosis of C. albicans by another plant defensin, HsAFP1 [87]. Interestingly, HsAFP1 was the first plant defensin for which a direct interaction with a fungal-specific lipid-based receptor was demonstrated [126], however at that time, this receptor could not be identified. Later studies by Thevissen and coworkers demonstrated that RsAFP2 interacts with fungal-specific glucosylceramides (GlcCer) [127]. The GlcCer constituents are present in the cell membrane and wall of susceptible fungi. As RsAFP2 cannot interact (or does so to a substantially lesser extent) with structurally distinct GlcCer from plant or human cells [127], the induction of RCD is selective to organisms that contain the fungal-specific sphingolipid receptor. This relationship explains why RsAFP2 is not active against the emerging fungal pathogen Candida glabrata, as this organism does not produce GlcCer due to a lack of the GCS1 gene encoding glucosylceramide synthase [128]. Subsequently, Thevissen et al. demonstrated that RsAFP2 is not internalized in the cell per se, but associates with the cell envelope, resulting in cell wall stress, septin mislocalization, and accumulation of ceramides in C. albicans [129]. The latter effects are likely responsible for the induction of apoptosis; however, the exact mechanism yielding RCD relative to the RsAFP2-induced ceramide accumulation is hitherto unknown. Thus, multiple lines of evidence suggest this peptide induces RCD by way of targeting mitochondrial and cell cycle functions.

These antifungal effects of RsAFP2 were also found to be synergistic with caspofungin in mitigating the pathogenic consequences of C. albicans biofilms [130]. In the case of HsAFP1, the identity of the fungal-specific membrane receptor has not yet been elucidated. Its fungicidal action exploits the oxidative respiratory chain in C. albicans to cause hyperaccumulation of ROS among other phenotypic markers of apoptotic death. Interestingly, genes associated with conferring susceptibility to this peptide were those mediating mitochondrial response and related stress-induced functions [87]. Very recent evidence indicates that HsAFP1 can bind to phosphatidic acid (PA) and to a lesser extent, to various phosphatidyl inositol moieties [131]. Specifically, this peptide accumulates at the cell surface of yeast cells with intact membranes, most notably at the buds and septa, and is subsequently internalized. Further, PA was found to play an influential role in the internalization of HsAFP1, as yeast expressing reduced PA levels internalized less of this peptide (Thevissen, unpublished data). However, additional as yet unknown fungal-specific processes and targets also appear to be playing a role in HsAFP1 internalization. Likewise, in the case of the plant defensin NaD1, cell wall components have been implicated in its internalization [132, 133]. Microbicidal effects resulting from induction of RCD, such as energy perturbation and membrane permeabilization, are presumably secondary effects that ensue following HsAFP1 internalization [131].

3.2.2. Plant Defensin-Like Peptides

The seeds of the leguminous plant Adenanthera pavonina are the source of a recently identified peptide that exerts apoptotic mechanisms of action against fungi [134]. This defensin-like plant polypeptide termed ApDef-1 causes cell cycle dysfunction and concomitant intracellular ROS accumulation and chromatin condensation prior to metacaspase activation and cell death by intrinsic apoptosis. It is not yet known if ApDef-1 triggers these effects through general stress responses or if prototypic fungal pathogens such as C. albicans or pathogenic molds are susceptible to this mechanism of action. The LpDef1 peptide recently isolated from the seeds of Lecythis pisonis causes the accumulation of ROS and mitochondrial dysfunction in C. albicans, pointing towards RCD as mechanism of action [135].

3.2.3. Insect Defensin Coprisin

Coprisin is an antimicrobial peptide from the dung beetle with features of the broader insect defensin family [136, 137]. In its 43 amino acid form, there are two Cys-disulfide bonds that stabilize its characteristic CS–αβ structure. Lee et al. reported this form of coprisin to exert energy- and salt-dependent mechanisms of RCD in C. albicans [138]. These activities include accumulation of intracellular ROS, dysfunctional mitochondrial Δψ and cytochrome C release, phosphatidylserine externalization, and metacaspase activation, leading to apoptotic death of C. albicans.

3.2.4. Fungal Defensin-Like Peptides

Along with higher eukaryotic organisms, fungi themselves appear to have exploited RCD over an evolutionary timespan as a means to protect themselves from other competing fungal organisms. For example, the Neosartorya fischeri antifungal protein (NFAP) is a basic, cysteine-rich, extracellular antifungal protein with structural similarity to defensins [139]. This peptide is characterized by a β–barrel topology, constituting five highly twisted antiparallel β–strands, stabilized by disulfide bridges. However, in contrast to its β–defensin relatives, NFAP contains a hydrophobic core [140]. Homologues of this peptide have also been isolated from Aspergillus giganteus (Aspergillus giganteus antifungal protein (AFP)), Aspergillus clavatus (Aspergillus clavatus antifungal protein (AcAMP)), and Aspergillus niger (Aspergillus niger antifungal protein (ANAFP)) [141, 142]. Specifically, NFAP is produced by the N. fischeri NRRL 181 isolate (anamorph: Aspergillus fischerianus). Heterologous expression of the nfap gene in the NFAP-sensitive A. nidulans revealed the induction of intrinsic apoptosis, as well as damage and dysfunction of the cell wall, the destruction of chitin filaments, and the accumulation of nuclei at the broken hyphal tips [143].

3.2.5. Human Defensins

Human neutrophil defensin-1 (hNP-1) and human beta-defensin 2 (hβD-2) are among the most predominant of the host defense peptides elaborated within neutrophils and expressed by the integument (epithelial barriers), respectively. Notably, hβD-2 has been shown to perturb mitochondrial energetics and induce phosphatidylserine accessibility in C. albicans [115]. Such results indicate that these peptides exert their candidacidal mechanisms at least in part via a RCD response involving mitochondrial targeting. These effects were influenced by pH and occurred in relationship to altered cell membrane permeability. Similar mechanisms of anticandidal activity have been observed for hNP-1. Extending on these findings, two genes have now been identified in HDP resistance in C. albicans and S. cerevisiae. Gank et al. showed that the gene SSD1 is integral to the ability of these fungi to survive in the face of human defensins [144]. Moreover, an ssd1 null C. albicans strain was significantly less virulent in a mouse model of infection as compared to its wild-type counterpart. Subsequent investigations by Jung et al. demonstrated that the regulatory gene BCR1 also contributes to host defense peptide resistance in C. albicans likely via a pathway that intersects that of SSD1 [145]. Of note, a synthetic β–hairpin peptide (RP-13) that lacks a γ–core motif did not exert anticandidal activities identical to those of hNP-1 or hβD-2.

3.2.6. Kinocidins

Kinocidins are chemokines that exert direct microbicidal activities and potentiate functions of synergistic immune effectors, such as leukocytes [123, 146, 147]. These host defense peptides have common structural configurations comprising three modular domains: (1) N-terminal domain containing the chemokine cysteine motif; (2) interposing γ–core domain; and (3) C-terminal microbicidal helical domain [147, 148]. All mammalian kinocidins are characterized by this structural pattern. Human kinocidins representing all four conventional chemokine cysteine array structure groups (C, CC, CXC, and CX3C) have been identified and demonstrated to have direct microbicidal activity against human pathogens [147], and congeners of these molecules have been engineered for enhanced antimicrobial activity [149, 150]. The two predominant groups of kinocidins are distinguished as α (CXC) or β (CC and other). Examples of α–kinocidins (CXC) include platelet factor-4 (PF-4; CXCL4) and platelet basic peptide (PBP; CXCL7), interleukin-8 (CXCL8), monokine induced by interferon-γ (MIG-9; CXCL9), interferon-γ inducible protein-10 kDa (IP-10; CXCL10), and interferon-inducible T cell α-chemoattractant (I-TAC9; CXCL11) [123, 147, 151]. Specific examples of β–kinocidins (CC and other subgroups) include monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1; CCL2), macrophage inflammatory protein-1 (MIP-1; CCL3), RANTES (regulated upon activation, normal T cell expressed/secreted; CCL5), and lymphotactin (CL1). The importance of these concepts and roles for host defense peptides having more than just antimicrobial activity are reviewed elsewhere [146, 152].

Kinocidin holoproteins and their modular peptide domains exert direct antifungal activities which are conditionally dependent. For example, kinocidins CXCL1 (GRO-a), CXCL8 (IL-8), CCL5 (RANTES), and CL1 (lymphotactin) exert significant candidacidal efficacy at pH 5.5 but little or no activity at pH 7.5 in vitro [147]. The fungicidal effect of the CXCL8 holoprotein was observed with as little as 1 nmol/ml, with complete sterilization of a 6 log CFU inoculum of C. albicans exposure to 5 nmol/ml of this protein. Importantly, the hemipeptide of CXCL8 containing the γ–core and microbicidal helix accounted for all of the antifungal activity of the holoprotein. For example, the isolated microbicidal helix of CXCL8 at 0.5 nmol/ml exerted sterilization of a 6 log inoculum of this organism in the same solution phase assay in vitro. Interestingly, whereas the kinocidins typically exert strong anti-C. albicans activity at pH 5.5, their efficacy is considerably less at pH 7.5. This pattern of activity is opposite to that of these peptides versus bacteria, which generally is substantially greater at pH 7.5 than pH 5.5 in vitro.

Mechanisms of kinocidin antifungal action have been studied using C. albicans clinical isolates and genetic mutants. For example, a synthetic peptide congener (RP-1) designed on the microbicidal helices of mammalian CXCL4 (PF-4) family kinocidins caused invagination and permeabilization of the cell membrane, condensation of cytoplasmic macromolecules, and loss of mitochondrial energetics in wild-type C. albicans [145, 153]. Gank et al. and Jung et al. demonstrated that Ssd1 and Bcr1 proteins function in a pathway that is integral to the survival of this organism in the face of low concentrations RP-1 and other host defense peptides [144, 145]. To gain further mechanistic insights, C. albicans wild type, Δssd1ssd1 null, SSD1 complemented and forced overexpression mutants were exposed to RP-1 under distinct pH conditions simulating bloodstream (pH 7.5) or abscess (pH 5.5) contexts in vitro. Mechanisms of action were then evaluated using multiparametric flow cytometry assay devised to simultaneously assess six modes of activity (osmotic homeostasis; macromolecular condensation; cell membrane permeability; mitochondrial energetics; phosphatidylserine display; and caspase-like protease activity) [153]. SSD1 expression inversely correlated with antimicrobial peptide susceptibility, mitochondrial deenergization and phosphatidylserine accessibility. Moreover, SSD1 expression corresponded to mitigation of membrane permeability (assessed by propidium iodide staining, PI) and caspase-like protease induction and was greater at pH 7.5 than pH 5.5. Collectively, these results suggest that RP-1 and perhaps other host defense peptides induce RCD in C. albicans which can be modulated to some extent by Ssd1 protein. Similar studies focusing on Δbcr1bcr1 mutants of C. albicans demonstrated that the Bcr1 protein functions downstream of Ssd1 to mediate low level resistance to RP-1 and perhaps other host defense peptides by fostering homeostatic membrane integrity and mitochondrial energetics in vitro [145]. Furthermore, a homozygous null mutant of SSD1ssd1ssd1) was significantly less virulent in a murine model of hematogenous candidiasis [144]. Thus, the Ssd1-mediated pathway also plays an important role in the survival of C. albicans during infection in vivo.

3.3. Other Regulated Cell Death-Inducing Peptides

A variety of other natural peptides and proteins have been shown to induce apoptosis in yeast. Examples include osmotin [67], melittin [154], the aspergillocidal peptide PAF of Penicillium chrysogenum [155], the surfactant protein WH1 fungin produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens [156], a truncated derivative of dermaseptin S3 [66], yeast pheromone [157], psacotheacin [158], and the killer toxins produced by the yeast Kluyveromyces lactis [159]. Other peptides for which evidence exists of apoptosis-related mechanisms of action are reviewed in De Brucker et al. [160]. Additional examples of peptides that exert antifungal activity but for which RCD has not been substantiated are reviewed in [161].

4. Development of Peptide Anti-Infectives Targeting Fungal RCD

Meritorious attempts have been made to translate the potent and rapid in vitro antimicrobial activities of naturally occurring host defense and related peptides of higher organisms into novel anti-infective drugs. For a variety of reasons, this goal has proven quite elusive to date. Even so, exciting advances are emerging regarding structure, mechanism, and development of peptide-based agents. In the following discussion, the main challenges experienced to date and opportunities on the horizon are reviewed.

4.1. In Vitro to In Vivo Translation

There have been numerous examples of antibacterial peptide efficacy in animal models of infection. However, few of these agents have successfully reached phase III clinical trials, and no host defense peptide isolated from higher organisms or engineered mimetic thereof has achieved regulatory approval for use in clinical therapy [162, 163]. Even less progress has been made with respect to development of peptide therapeutics targeting fungal infections. There are only few reports that document in vivo efficacy of antifungal peptides. In this respect, Tavares et al. demonstrated efficacy of the native plant antifungal peptide RsAFP2 when administered prophylactically in a mouse candidiasis model [164]. Moreover, combined therapy of PAF, the small antifungal protein from Penicillium chrysogenum, and amphotericin B (AMB), which act synergistically in vitro, was more effective than either AMB or PAF treatment alone in a mouse model for invasive pulmonary aspergillosis [165]. Aside from toxicologic and pharmacologic barriers (see below), one significant issue in this respect is the reality that in vitro activity does not consistently translate to in vivo efficacy. As discussed above, the challenge of context likely plays a major role in this regard. For example, many published methods assess antimicrobial peptide efficacy in austere buffer systems that lack relevant physiologic constituents or conditions. Complicating this issue is the observation that even the most bioactive peptides can exhibit little or no efficacy in complex media (e.g., Mueller-Hinton or Brain-Heart Infusion broth) often used for standard MIC testing. Thus, the relevance of in vitro susceptibility testing of any antimicrobial peptide should be considered in relation to these limitations. A more relevant but more cost- and labor-intensive method involves testing peptide compounds in blood biomatrices, including whole blood, plasma, and serum ex vivo [166]. This method has two important advances over assays done in buffer systems: (1) peptides must overcome binding to molecular or cellular constituents present in the matrix and (2) additive or synergistic functions of a peptide with other host defense mechanisms can be assessed, for example, potentiation of neutrophil opsonophagocytosis and intracellular killing [146].

Translation of in vitro activity to in vivo efficacy has also been limited with respect to antifungal peptide efficacy. Gank et al. correlated in vitro hypersusceptibility of C. albicans to host defense peptides with in vivo hypovirulence in a murine model of hematogenous dissemination [144]. Very recently, Cools et al. demonstrated that truncated HsAFP1-based peptides spanning the γ–core were very active in combination with caspofungin against biofilms in vitro. However, translation to in vivo conditions failed due to the interaction of the truncated peptides with serum albumins [167], which could not be resolved by their subsequent PEGylation or cyclization. Interestingly, however, native HsAFP1 still displayed activity in the presence of serum albumins, possibly owing to its structured configuration. Hence, it is plausible that the use of native HDPs or their engineered congeners, alone or in combination with standard antimycotics, bears great potential to combat fungal infections including those resistant to current therapies.

4.2. Off-Target Effects and Toxicity

One key challenge to therapeutic development of peptide antifungal agents relates to the undefined toxicity of certain candidates tested clinically to date. Several examples of anti-infective peptide candidates failing in preclinical development or early-stage clinical trials have been cited for reasons largely due to off-target effects and toxicity. Notable cases in this regard have been reviewed elsewhere [151, 168, 169]. As detailed above, evidence strongly supports the concept that some host defense peptides and engineered congeners thereof act at least in part by inducing or eventuating RCD in fungal target cells. This double-edged sword is likely a result of multiple convergent issues: (1) unicellular (e.g., fungi) and multicellular (e.g., mammals) eukaryotes share common molecular machineries and signal-response pathways that are responsible for RCD; (2) evolutionary, structural, and functional parallels exist among families of host defense peptides, venoms, and toxins [115]. For example, reciprocal structure-function relationships exist among human defensins such as hBD-2 and venoms/neurotoxins such as rattlesnake crotamine sharing related γ–core structural motifs [115, 170]. Mechanistic data and computational modeling also support such relationships. For example, hBD-2 and crotamine each significantly perturb mitochondrial energetics and induce phosphatidylserine accessibility of C. albicans and human endothelial cells in vitro [115]. Likewise, Aarbiou et al. showed that hNP-1 and LL-37 induce death of human lung epithelia and human immortalized T lymphocytes (Jurkat T cells) by mitochondrial injury [171]. In support of these concepts, Zhu et al. reported that mutations of two residues in a core consensus insect defensin sequence possessing a structural signature related to toxogenic effects of scorpion venoms could convert a defensin into a neurotoxin [172]. Similarly, Vriens et al. reported on the mutation of one residue in the sequence of the antifungal plant defensin PDF2.3 from Arabidopsis thaliana (AtPDF2.3), thereby converting its partial scorpion toxin signature into the full toxin signature [171173]. As a consequence, this mutant AtPDF2.3 was characterized by antifungal activity and inhibitory activity toward mammalian Kv1.2 and Kv1.6 potassium channels [173]. Therefore, untoward toxicologic mechanisms and determinants that may reside in host defense peptides chosen to serve as antifungal templates will need to be addressed during preclinical and clinical development.

In balance, there are important opportunities pertaining to the potential for host defense peptides or their mimetics to be developed as novel antifungal agents targeting RCD. For example, crotamine was found to occlude eukaryotic (mammalian Kv1.2 or C. albicans CAK) potassium channels in molecular simulations using NMR structures. However, while hBD-2 engaged them with lower affinity, it did not occlude either of these mammalian or prokaryotic potassium channels (Escherichia coli KcsA) [115]. This finding suggests there are definable structure-activity features that may guide the differentiation of antimicrobial activity from host cell toxicities. Likewise, the means by which antifungal peptides or their congeners target cells may be exploited or used to improve selective toxicity. For instance, RsAFP2 has been shown to interact directly with fungal-specific glucosylceramides [127]. Interestingly, while RsAFP2 is not internalized following this interaction, a related antifungal peptide (HsAFP1) does undergo internalization and may induce RCD in target organisms. Moreover, plant defensin NaD1 is unable to permeabilize fungal cell membranes or kill target cells when the β-glucan layer is removed, suggesting a specific target or vulnerable process localizes to this layer [133]. Li et al. have reported Ssa1/2 to be a key cell envelope-binding protein for histatin-5 in targeting C. albicans [174]. In the case of plant defensin MtDef4, its internalization is energy dependent and mediated through endocytosis in Neurospora crassa [175]. Nonetheless, to date there are few other examples of specific receptors for antifungal peptides, and only limited information exists on their exact mechanisms of uptake or selective toxicity.

One notable advance that may facilitate development of antifungal peptide drugs relates to the recent discovery that peptides evolved to target or govern mitochondrial functions in eukaryotic cells contain sequence domains that exert potent antimicrobial activity in vitro [176, 177]. This interesting area is based on the evolutionary progression that led to eukaryotic symbiosis with prokaryotes in the form of mitochondria. Many of these peptides or engineered mimetics thereof induce classic features of RCD in fungi but not in human cell lines. Thus, subtle structural and/or mechanistic features may be designed into peptides to afford greater selective toxicity that targets fungal RCD as an anti-infective strategy. Moreover, particularly advantageous aspects of antifungal peptides that are ultimately developed to target RCD include their likelihood to mitigate a proinflammatory storm of necrotic cell death that may result from antifungal agents inducing survival countermeasures of the target organism.

4.3. Pharmacologic Uncertainties

An essential concept has been recognized with respect to naturally occurring antimicrobial peptides, and which has direct implications on the development of antifungal peptide therapeutics: distinct peptides have evolved in context to optimally defend distinct anatomic, physiologic, and microbiologic niches in their host [122, 123, 151]. For example, the human α–defensins hNP-1, -2, -3, and -4 are exclusively confined to neutrophil granules. These peptides must be able to function in settings of reduced pH and high levels of reactive oxygen species that are integral to the microbicidal milieu of neutrophil phagolysosomes. By comparison, α–defensins HD-5 and HD-5 (alias, cryptdins) are expressed by Paneth cells of small intestine villus crypts. Similarly, human β–defensins such as hBD-2 are only predominantly expressed by skin and cutaneous epithelial barrier cells such as keratinocytes. Importantly, while hNPs, HDs, and hBDs share the cysteine array characteristic of the defensin peptide family [170], they differ in sequence and composition as likely optimized to best defend the distinct niches in which they are expressed. It follows that attempts to deploy these peptides or their nonnatural congeners as systemic antimicrobials have largely met with loss of activity or poor efficacy, degradation or lack of durable availability, and/or toxicity when placed out of context.

Defining the conditional optima for peptide antimicrobial activities is an area that remains to be fully explored. Even so, several aspects of the microenvironment in which antimicrobial peptides best function to target pathogens and spare hosts have been studied. These include ion or salt concentrations, pH, protein binding, and growth phase/status of the target organism, among other factors [151, 178, 179]. Lakshminarayanan et al. demonstrated that conditions which alter transmembrane potential and membrane rigidity protect C. albicans from lethality due to tetravalent peptide B4010 (4 copies of the sequence RGRKVVRR linked through a branched lysine) [180]. Another challenge to development of peptide anti-infectives is their vulnerability to proteolytic degradation by a variety of proteases encountered systemically, be they en route to or enriched within sites of infection. For example, metalloproteases, trypsin, and chymotrypsin as well other proteases can cleave peptides into nonfunctional fragments. In addition, proteases generated by the pathogens themselves have been demonstrated to serve as resistance mechanisms to certain host defense peptides [181185].

Various strategies have been used to circumvent the issues of proteolytic degradation that could negatively affect pharmacology of anti-infective peptides. A specific approach that may facilitate therapeutic advancement is the structural design of antifungal peptides or mimetics that retain potent and multimodal mechanisms of action but which are less susceptible or inert to rapid degradation. For example, use of nonnatural amino acids (e.g., D- versus L-enantiomeric amino acids), peptoid platforms and cyclization are methods that have been explored in reducing enzyme vulnerability of lead candidate templates as a means to improve half-life, distribution, and other pharmacokinetic parameters [151, 169]. Notable in this latter regard is the θ (theta) family of defensins that are found in leukocytes of Old World monkeys and orangutans, which are cyclic peptides generated by a posttranslational ligation event of two truncated α–defensin substrates [186]. Likewise, cyclic orbitide peptides from Euphorbiaceae spp. and novel cyclodepsipeptides of fungal organisms represent intriguing antifungal templates [187, 188]. Indeed, naturally occurring peptide-based molecules have illustrated success in this regard and are approved for clinical use as antifungals. For example, echinocandins are peptide-based compounds that inhibit the synthesis of cell wall glucan in fungi including Candida spp. and Cryptococcus neoformans and often have fungistatic activity against some pathogenic molds (e.g., Aspergillus). Members of this antifungal class (caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin) are highly complex cyclic hexapeptoids conjugated to N-linked lipids that competitively inhibit 1,3–β glucan synthase [189]. Echinocandin therapeutics are derived from the papulacandin family of naturally occurring antifungals originally isolated from Papularia spp. of marine fungi. However, while these agents are technically peptide-based, they are quite distinct from mammalian or plant host defense peptides. Ultrashort peptides, including amidated sequences [190], may offer new insights into antifungal peptide therapeutic agents or strategies. Other approaches include liposomal formulation, continuous infusion, and topical applications.

Opportunities also exist for innovative approaches to development of antifungal peptides based on natural designs and their biological roles in a certain context. For example, specific peptides also have distinct functions under differing conditions and are processed in context to render distinctive functional modules. These themes are established for many kinocidins including CXCL4 and CXCL8, which undergo context-specific cleavage by relevant proteases to yield fully autonomous microbicidal helices [148, 179, 191]. Interestingly, their helical domains exhibit differences in antimicrobial spectra and have greater antifungal activity at pH 5.5 than pH 7.5. Innovative approaches based on such natural processing may afford strategic opportunities to exploit contextually optimized antifungal peptide structures or mechanisms. For example, context-activated protides are synthetic, multimodular propeptides designed to sense and be activated in direct response to strategic microbial or host signals—including proteases and other enzymes—in contexts of infection [123, 192]. Thus, these agents are intended to have complementary advantages with respect to their therapeutic potential. First, they are designed to intensify in the immediate proximity of infection, targeting derivative antimicrobial effector modules to microbes. Second, in contrast to conventional antibiotics which select for resistant pathogens, protides are biased to favor organisms that lack or do not express virulence determinant activators and are poorly or nonpathogenic. Thus, beyond enhanced efficacy and improved targeting of the infecting microbe, context-activated protides have the intriguing potential to shift the evolution of pathogens in favor of nonpathogenic phenotypes. Context-activated protide lead candidates are currently in the process of preclinical development.

Perhaps even more specific to the potential development of biologics targeted for fungal efficacy are recently invented proteins and peptides that induce cell death by exploiting regulated cell death evolutionary relationships [176]. These molecules are designed in part based upon the structure-function relationships of nuclear-encoded proteins that regulate mitochondrial function. As with the context-activated protide platform, the molecules in this technology platform are in the preclinical stage of development.

4.4. Sourcing and Manufacturing Issues

Isolation of naturally occurring antimicrobial peptides from native organisms or synthesis of natural or engineered forms of these molecules has historically been seen as time-, labor-, and cost-intensive for feasible commercial development. Therefore, expression systems are most commonly considered for bulk production necessary for commodity-scale use. However, by virtue of their antimicrobial activities, heterologous expression in microbial systems (e.g., E. coli) can present issues regarding generation of large amounts of bioactive compound [193]. In this regard, codon-use bias, intracellular granule storage, and misfolding have been among the key pitfalls encountered. To partially circumvent these issues, heterologous expression in the eukaryotes Pichia pastoris and Penicillium chrysogenum has been proven successful for production of various types of plant defensins [194] and other cysteine-rich, cationic, antifungal peptides [195], respectively. However, the above issues may remain considerable barriers in terms of sourcing and manufacturing of anti-infective peptides, directing production by means other than classical culture and recovery systems. However, recent advances in peptide expression and other innovative approaches including solid-state synthesis have provided new and practical methods to surmount many of these issues. A notable example in this regard was the large-scale heterologous expression of the defensin-family peptide plectasin, from the saprophytic fungus Pseudoplectania nigrella. Generation of this cysteine-stabilized peptide at a commodity scale and GMP quality as necessary for human clinical trials provides proof of concept that such peptides can be produced as therapeutics [196]. In addition, the number and diversity of regulatory approved peptide-based therapeutics is growing rapidly, demonstrating how peptides or biologics targeting microbial RCD or other mechanisms can overcome sourcing and manufacturing barriers [197].

5. Prospectus

Host defense peptides from natural sources have long held promise to serve as templates for novel anti-infective agents. This optimism stems from the rapid and potent antimicrobial efficacies of many such compounds, which often exert multimodal mechanisms of action that are considerably less prone to resistance development than static small molecules. The scope of structural and functional features of antifungal peptides has burgeoned in recent years (Figure 2). This trend is expected to accelerate in the coming decade, given the urgency with which novel antifungal and other antimicrobial agents are needed to meet the growing threat of resistance. Many pathogenic fungi are highly refractory to existing anti-infective agents, resulting in high rates of morbidity and mortality. Compounding this challenge are the significant increases in the projected incidence and prevalence of conditions predisposing to invasive fungal infections, including cancer, respiratory diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), organ transplantation, and others. As reviewed herein, of special importance is the opportunity for innovative peptides or mimetics thereof to exploit RCD pathways in fungi as novel therapeutic targets. This strategy has multiple conceptual advantages, including mechanistic novelty and the mitigation of inflammatory storm responses that may occur as fungi attempt to counteract traditional antifungal agents. For example, fungi such as Candida albicans may create a systemic and cytokine storm-like effect following the application of antifungal therapy. Likewise, other fungal pathogens may participate in immune reconstitution inflammatory syndromes (IRIS) in the setting of infection in immune compromised hosts. Therefore, controlling fungal infections through regulated cell death has the potential to minimize or avoid these unintended consequences of conventional antifungal therapy.

To realize the potential for evolutionary-proven efficacy of natural antifungal peptides as innovative therapeutics, an intensive and coordinated research and development process is needed, including: (1) host and fungal science to better understand and optimize fungal RCD as a selective target for peptide-based therapeutics; (2) structure-mechanism relationship studies to define the key sequence and/or 3-dimensional determinants of peptides that selectively induce RCD in fungal cell targets; (3) medicinal chemistry to minimize or eliminate off-target host cell toxicity and optimize the pharmacologic delivery of antifungal peptide therapeutics; and (4) feasible and cost-efficient methods for generating commodity-scale peptide anti-infective drugs at GMP quality for clinical use. Achieving these goals appears to be in reach with sustained prioritization of novel antifungal agents to meet the rising tide of fungal infections anticipated in the coming decades.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.


  1. G. D. Brown, D. W. Denning, N. A. R. Gow, S. M. Levitz, M. G. Netea, and T. C. White, “Hidden killers: human fungal infections,” Science Translational Medicine, vol. 4, no. 165, article 165rv13, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. B. Calvo, A. S. A. Melo, A. Perozo-Mena et al., “First report of Candida auris in America: clinical and microbiological aspects of 18 episodes of candidemia,” Journal of Infection, vol. 73, no. 4, pp. 369–374, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S. Corcione, R. Angilletta, S. Raviolo et al., “Epidemiology and risk factors for mortality in bloodstream infection by CP-Kp, ESBL-E, Candida and CDI: a single center retrospective study,” European Journal of Internal Medicine, vol. 48, pp. 44–49, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. M. B. Edmond, S. E. Wallace, D. K. McClish, M. A. Pfaller, R. N. Jones, and R. P. Wenzel, “Nosocomial bloodstream infections in United States hospitals: a three-year analysis,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 239–244, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. S. Rangel-Frausto, T. Wiblin, H. M. Blumberg et al., “National epidemiology of mycoses survey (NEMIS): variations in rates of bloodstream infections due to Candida species in seven surgical intensive care units and six neonatal intensive care units,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 253–258, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. O. Ekenna, R. J. Sherertz, and H. Bingham, “Natural history of bloodstream infections in a burn patient population: the importance of candidemia,” American Journal of Infection Control, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 189–195, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. D. R. Andes, N. Safdar, J. W. Baddley et al., “The epidemiology and outcomes of invasive Candida infections among organ transplant recipients in the United States: results of the Transplant-Associated Infection Surveillance Network (TRANSNET),” Transplant Infectious Disease, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 921–931, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. P. Castaldo, R. J. Stratta, R. P. Wood et al., “Clinical spectrum of fungal infections after orthotopic liver transplantation,” Archives of Surgery, vol. 126, no. 2, pp. 149–156, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. J. M. Rabkin, S. L. Oroloff, C. L. Corless et al., “Association of fungal infection and increased mortality in liver transplant recipients,” The American Journal of Surgery, vol. 179, no. 5, pp. 426–430, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. P. M. Arnow, E. M. Quimosing, and M. Beach, “Consequences of intravascular catheter sepsis,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 778–784, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. S. B. Wey, M. Mori, M. A. Pfaller, R. F. Woolson, and R. P. Wenzel, “Hospital-acquired candidemia. The attributable mortality and excess length of stay,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 148, no. 12, pp. 2642–2645, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. S. R. Lockhart, K. A. Etienne, S. Vallabhaneni et al., “Simultaneous emergence of multidrug-resistant Candida auris on 3 continents confirmed by whole-genome sequencing and epidemiological analyses,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 134–140, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. A. P. Douglas, S. C.-A. Chen, and M. A. Slavin, “Emerging infections caused by non-Aspergillus filamentous fungi,” Clinical Microbiology and Infection, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 670–680, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. R. E. Lewis and D. P. Kontoyiannis, “Epidemiology and treatment of mucormycosis,” Future Microbiology, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 1163–1175, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. M. G. Dorrington and D. M. E. Bowdish, “Immunosenescence and novel vaccination strategies for the elderly,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 4, p. 171, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. K. A. Thursky and L. J. Worth, “Can mortality of cancer patients with fever and neutropenia be improved?” Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 505–513, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. K. A. Kline and D. M. E. Bowdish, “Infection in an aging population,” Current Opinion in Microbiology, vol. 29, pp. 63–67, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. WHO, “Are you ready? What you need to know about ageing,” December 2017. http://www.who.int/world-health-day/2012/toolkit/background/en/. View at: Google Scholar
  19. “WPAM.pdf,” December 2017 https://www.nia.nih.gov/sites/default/files/2017-06/WPAM.pdf. View at: Google Scholar
  20. J. Truong, E. K. Lee, M. E. Trudeau, and K. K. W. Chan, “Interpreting febrile neutropenia rates from randomized, controlled trials for consideration of primary prophylaxis in the real world: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 608–618, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. T. Holland, V. G. Fowler Jr., and S. A. Shelburne III, “Invasive gram-positive bacterial infection in cancer patients,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 59, Supplement 5, pp. S331–S334, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. M. J. Hayat, N. Howlader, M. E. Reichman, and B. K. Edwards, “Cancer statistics, trends, and multiple primary cancer analyses from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program,” The Oncologist, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 20–37, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. P. L. Owens, M. L. Barrett, S. Raetzman, M. Maggard-Gibbons, and C. A. Steiner, “Surgical site infections following ambulatory surgery procedures,” JAMA, vol. 311, no. 7, pp. 709–716, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. J. T. Wiseman, S. Fernandes-Taylor, M. L. Barnes et al., “Predictors of surgical site infection after hospital discharge in patients undergoing major vascular surgery,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 1023–31.e5, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. P. Dorschner, L. M. McElroy, and M. G. Ison, “Nosocomial infections within the first month of solid organ transplantation,” Transplant Infectious Disease, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 171–187, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. E. J. Polvi, X. Li, T. R. O’Meara, M. D. Leach, and L. E. Cowen, “Opportunistic yeast pathogens: reservoirs, virulence mechanisms, and therapeutic strategies,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 72, no. 12, pp. 2261–2287, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. Y. Shoenfeld, C. Selmi, E. Zimlichman, and M. E. Gershwin, “The autoimmunologist: geoepidemiology, a new center of gravity, and prime time for autoimmunity,” Journal of Autoimmunity, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 325–330, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. N. Agmon-Levin, Z. Lian, and Y. Shoenfeld, “Explosion of autoimmune diseases and the mosaic of old and novel factors,” Cellular & Molecular Immunology, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 189–192, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. S. E. Gabriel and K. Michaud, “Epidemiological studies in incidence, prevalence, mortality, and comorbidity of the rheumatic diseases,” Arthritis Research & Therapy, vol. 11, no. 3, p. 229, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. S. J. Walsh and L. M. Rau, “Autoimmune diseases: a leading cause of death among young and middle-aged women in the United States,” American Journal of Public Health, vol. 90, no. 9, pp. 1463–1466, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. A. Winkelmann, M. Loebermann, E. C. Reisinger, H.-P. Hartung, and U. K. Zettl, “Disease-modifying therapies and infectious risks in multiple sclerosis,” Nature Reviews Neurology, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 217–233, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. M. R. Yeaman and J. P. Hennessey Jr., “Innovative approaches to improve anti-infective vaccine efficacy,” Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 189–222, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. T. Roemer and D. J. Krysan, “Antifungal drug development: challenges, unmet clinical needs, and new approaches,” Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine, vol. 4, no. 5, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. N. P. Wiederhold, “Antifungal resistance: current trends and future strategies to combat,” Infection and Drug Resistance, vol. 10, pp. 249–259, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. L. Galluzzi, I. Vitale, S. A. Aaronson et al., “Molecular mechanisms of cell death: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2018,” Cell Death & Differentiation, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 486–541, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. D. Carmona-Gutierrez, M. A. Bauer, A. Zimmermann et al., “Guidelines and recommendations on yeast cell death nomenclature,” Microbial Cell, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 4–31, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. S. Büttner, T. Eisenberg, E. Herker, D. Carmona-Gutierrez, G. Kroemer, and F. Madeo, “Why yeast cells can undergo apoptosis: death in times of peace, love, and war,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 175, no. 4, pp. 521–525, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. F. F. Severin and A. A. Hyman, “Pheromone induces programmed cell death in S. cerevisiae,” Current Biology, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. R233–R235, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. L. Váchová and Z. Palková, “Physiological regulation of yeast cell death in multicellular colonies is triggered by ammonia,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 169, no. 5, pp. 711–717, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. P. Fabrizio, L. Battistella, R. Vardavas et al., “Superoxide is a mediator of an altruistic aging program in Saccharomyces cerevisiae,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 166, no. 7, pp. 1055–1067, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. E. Herker, H. Jungwirth, K. A. Lehmann et al., “Chronological aging leads to apoptosis in yeast,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 164, no. 4, pp. 501–507, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. P. Laun, A. Pichova, F. Madeo et al., “Aged mother cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae show markers of oxidative stress and apoptosis,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 1166–1173, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. J. Reiter, E. Herker, F. Madeo, and M. J. Schmitt, “Viral killer toxins induce caspase-mediated apoptosis in yeast,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 168, no. 3, pp. 353–358, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. G. Banfalvi, “Mille modis morimur: we die in a thousand ways,” Apoptosis, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 169–174, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. D. Carmona-Gutierrez, T. Eisenberg, S. Büttner, C. Meisinger, G. Kroemer, and F. Madeo, “Apoptosis in yeast: triggers, pathways, subroutines,” Cell Death & Differentiation, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 763–773, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. C. Falcone and C. Mazzoni, “External and internal triggers of cell death in yeast,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 73, no. 11-12, pp. 2237–2250, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. R. Strich, “Programmed cell death initiation and execution in budding yeast,” Genetics, vol. 200, no. 4, pp. 1003–1014, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. S. Büttner, T. Eisenberg, D. Carmona-Gutierrez et al., “Endonuclease G regulates budding yeast life and death,” Molecular Cell, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 233–246, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. S. Wissing, P. Ludovico, E. Herker et al., “An AIF orthologue regulates apoptosis in yeast,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 166, no. 7, pp. 969–974, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. T. Eisenberg, S. Büttner, G. Kroemer, and F. Madeo, “The mitochondrial pathway in yeast apoptosis,” Apoptosis, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 1011–1023, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. J. N. Algazaq, K. Akrami, F. Martinez, A. McCutchan, and A. R. Bharti, “Saccharomyces cerevisiae laryngitis and oral lesions in a patient with laryngeal carcinoma,” Case Reports in Infectious Diseases, vol. 2017, Article ID 2941527, 4 pages, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. F. Madeo, E. Herker, C. Maldener et al., “A caspase-related protease regulates apoptosis in yeast,” Molecular Cell, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 911–917, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. J. F. Sundström, A. Vaculova, A. P. Smertenko et al., “Tudor staphylococcal nuclease is an evolutionarily conserved component of the programmed cell death degradome,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 1347–1354, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. F. Madeo, D. Carmona-Gutierrez, J. Ring, S. Büttner, T. Eisenberg, and G. Kroemer, “Caspase-dependent and caspase-independent cell death pathways in yeast,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 382, no. 2, pp. 227–231, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. D. Wilkinson and M. Ramsdale, “Proteases and caspase-like activity in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae,” Biochemical Society Transactions, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 1502–1508, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. F. Uhlmann, D. Wernic, M. A. Poupart, E. V. Koonin, and K. Nasmyth, “Cleavage of cohesin by the CD clan protease separin triggers anaphase in yeast,” Cell, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 375–386, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. H. Yang, Q. Ren, and Z. Zhang, “Cleavage of Mcd1 by caspase-like protease Esp1 promotes apoptosis in budding yeast,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 2127–2134, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. B. Fahrenkrog, U. Sauder, and U. Aebi, “The S. cerevisiae HtrA-like protein Nma111p is a nuclear serine protease that mediates yeast apoptosis,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 117, no. 1, Part 1, pp. 115–126, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. D. Walter, S. Wissing, F. Madeo, and B. Fahrenkrog, “The inhibitor-of-apoptosis protein Bir1p protects against apoptosis in S. cerevisiae and is a substrate for the yeast homologue of Omi/HtrA2,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 119, no. 9, pp. 1843–1851, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. D. Carmona-Gutierrez, A. Alavian-Ghavanini, L. Habernig et al., “The cell death protease Kex1p is essential for hypochlorite-induced apoptosis in yeast,” Cell Cycle, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 1704–1712, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. P. Hauptmann, C. Riel, L. A. Kunz-Schughart, K. U. Frohlich, F. Madeo, and L. Lehle, “Defects in N-glycosylation induce apoptosis in yeast,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 765–778, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. M. Weinberger, L. Ramachandran, L. Feng et al., “Apoptosis in budding yeast caused by defects in initiation of DNA replication,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 118, Part 15, no. 15, pp. 3543–3553, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. C. W. Gourlay, L. N. Carpp, P. Timpson, S. J. Winder, and K. R. Ayscough, “A role for the actin cytoskeleton in cell death and aging in yeast,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 164, no. 6, pp. 803–809, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. C. Mazzoni, E. Herker, V. Palermo et al., “Yeast caspase 1 links messenger RNA stability to apoptosis in yeast,” EMBO Reports, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 1076–1081, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. B. Almeida, A. Silva, A. Mesquita, B. Sampaio-Marques, F. Rodrigues, and P. Ludovico, “Drug-induced apoptosis in yeast,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research, vol. 1783, no. 7, pp. 1436–1448, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. C. O. Morton, S. C. Dos Santos, and P. Coote, “An amphibian-derived, cationic, α-helical antimicrobial peptide kills yeast by caspase-independent but AIF-dependent programmed cell death,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 494–507, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. M. L. Narasimhan, B. Damsz, M. A. Coca et al., “A plant defense response effector induces microbial apoptosis,” Molecular Cell, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 921–930, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. F. Reggiori and D. J. Klionsky, “Autophagic processes in yeast: mechanism, machinery and regulation,” Genetics, vol. 194, no. 2, pp. 341–361, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. X. Wen and D. J. Klionsky, “An overview of macroautophagy in yeast,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 428, no. 9, Part A, pp. 1681–1699, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. N. Kourtis and N. Tavernarakis, “Autophagy and cell death in model organisms,” Cell Death & Differentiation, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 21–30, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. M. Leão, S. Gomes, C. Bessa et al., “Studying p53 family proteins in yeast: induction of autophagic cell death and modulation by interactors and small molecules,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 330, no. 1, pp. 164–177, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. S. A. Dziedzic and A. B. Caplan, “Autophagy proteins play cytoprotective and cytocidal roles in leucine starvation-induced cell death in Saccharomyces cerevisiae,” Autophagy, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 731–738, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. N. Camougrand, A. Grelaud-Coq, E. Marza, M. Priault, J. J. Bessoule, and S. Manon, “The product of the UTH1 gene, required for Bax-induced cell death in yeast, is involved in the response to rapamycin,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 495–506, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. L. Galluzzi, T. Vanden Berghe, N. Vanlangenakker et al., “Programmed necrosis: from molecules to health and disease,” International Review of Cell and Molecular Biology, vol. 289, pp. 1–35, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. L. Galluzzi, O. Kepp, F. K.-M. Chan, and G. Kroemer, “Necroptosis: mechanisms and relevance to disease,” Annual Review of Pathology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 103–130, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. T. Eisenberg, D. Carmona-Gutierrez, S. Büttner, N. Tavernarakis, and F. Madeo, “Necrosis in yeast,” Apoptosis, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 257–268, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. T. Eisenberg, H. Knauer, A. Schauer et al., “Induction of autophagy by spermidine promotes longevity,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 1305–1314, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. E. Bener Aksam, H. Jungwirth, S. D. Kohlwein et al., “Absence of the peroxiredoxin Pmp20 causes peroxisomal protein leakage and necrotic cell death,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 1115–1124, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. H. Jungwirth, J. Ring, T. Mayer et al., “Loss of peroxisome function triggers necrosis,” FEBS Letters, vol. 582, no. 19, pp. 2882–2886, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. V. R. Richard, A. Beach, A. Piano et al., “Mechanism of liponecrosis, a distinct mode of programmed cell death,” Cell Cycle, vol. 13, no. 23, pp. 3707–3726, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. P. Rockenfeller, J. Ring, V. Muschett et al., “Fatty acids trigger mitochondrion-dependent necrosis,” Cell Cycle, vol. 9, no. 14, pp. 2836–2842, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. A. Schauer, H. Knauer, C. Ruckenstuhl et al., “Vacuolar functions determine the mode of cell death,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research, vol. 1793, no. 3, pp. 540–545, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. D. Carmona-Gutierrez, A. Reisenbichler, P. Heimbucher et al., “Ceramide triggers metacaspase-independent mitochondrial cell death in yeast,” Cell Cycle, vol. 10, no. 22, pp. 3973–3978, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. S.-J. Lin and N. Austriaco, “Aging and cell death in the other yeasts, Schizosaccharomyces pombe and Candida albicans,” FEMS Yeast Research, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 119–135, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. A. J. Phillips, I. Sudbery, and M. Ramsdale, “Apoptosis induced by environmental stresses and amphotericin B in Candida albicans,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 100, no. 24, pp. 14327–14332, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. A. M. Aerts, D. Carmona-Gutierrez, S. Lefevre et al., “The antifungal plant defensin RsAFP2 from radish induces apoptosis in a metacaspase independent way in Candida albicans,” FEBS Letters, vol. 583, no. 15, pp. 2513–2516, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. A. M. Aerts, L. Bammens, G. Govaert et al., “The antifungal plant Defensin HsAFP1 from Heuchera sanguinea induces apoptosis in Candida albicans,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 2, p. 47, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. H. Lee and D. G. Lee, “Fungicide Bac8c triggers attenuation of mitochondrial homeostasis and caspase-dependent apoptotic death,” Biochimie, vol. 133, pp. 80–86, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. H. Lee, J.-S. Hwang, and D. G. Lee, “Scolopendin, an antimicrobial peptide from centipede, attenuates mitochondrial functions and triggers apoptosis in Candida albicans,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 474, no. 5, pp. 635–645, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. S. N. Khan, S. Khan, J. Iqbal, R. Khan, and A. U. Khan, “Enhanced killing and antibiofilm activity of encapsulated cinnamaldehyde against Candida albicans,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 8, p. 1641, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. L. Sun, K. Liao, and D. Wang, “Honokiol induces superoxide production by targeting mitochondrial respiratory chain complex I in Candida albicans,” PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 8, article e0184003, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. H. Tian, S. Qu, Y. Wang et al., “Calcium and oxidative stress mediate perillaldehyde-induced apoptosis in Candida albicans,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 101, no. 8, pp. 3335–3345, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. T. Wang, G. Shi, J. Shao et al., “In vitro antifungal activity of baicalin against Candida albicans biofilms via apoptotic induction,” Microbial Pathogenesis, vol. 87, pp. 21–29, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. C. Chin, F. Donaghey, K. Helming, M. McCarthy, S. Rogers, and N. Austriaco, “Deletion of AIF1 but not of YCA1/MCA1 protects Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Candida albicans cells from caspofungin-induced programmed cell death,” Microbial Cell, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 58–63, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. F. Shirazi and D. P. Kontoyiannis, “Micafungin triggers caspase-dependent apoptosis in Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis biofilms, including caspofungin non-susceptible isolates,” Virulence, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 385–394, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. X.-Z. Wu, W.-Q. Chang, A.-X. Cheng, L.-M. Sun, and H.-X. Lou, “Plagiochin E, an antifungal active macrocyclic bis(bibenzyl), induced apoptosis in Candida albicans through a metacaspase-dependent apoptotic pathway,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects, vol. 1800, no. 4, pp. 439–447, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. Y. Cao, S. Huang, B. Dai et al., “Candida albicans cells lacking CaMCA1-encoded metacaspase show resistance to oxidative stress-induced death and change in energy metabolism,” Fungal Genetics and Biology, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 183–189, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. T. Léger, C. Garcia, M. Ounissi, G. Lelandais, and J.-M. Camadro, “The metacaspase (Mca1p) has a dual role in farnesol-induced apoptosis in Candida albicans,” Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 93–108, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. M. E. Shirtliff, B. P. Krom, R. A. M. Meijering et al., “Farnesol-induced apoptosis in Candida albicans,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 2392–2401, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. D. G. Yun and D. G. Lee, “Silibinin triggers yeast apoptosis related to mitochondrial Ca2+ influx in Candida albicans,” The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology, vol. 80, pp. 1–9, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  101. F. Ma, Y. Zhang, Y. Wang et al., “Role of Aif1 in regulation of cell death under environmental stress in Candida albicans,” Yeast, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 493–506, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  102. M. Ramsdale, “Programmed cell death in pathogenic fungi,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research, vol. 1783, no. 7, pp. 1369–1380, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  103. R. S. Al-Dhaheri and L. J. Douglas, “Apoptosis in Candida biofilms exposed to amphotericin B,” Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 149–157, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  104. A. J. Phillips, J. D. Crowe, and M. Ramsdale, “Ras pathway signaling accelerates programmed cell death in the pathogenic fungus Candida albicans,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 726–731, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  105. Y.-U. Baek, Y.-R. Kim, H.-S. Yim, and S.-O. Kang, “Disruption of γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase results in absolute glutathione auxotrophy and apoptosis in Candida albicans,” FEBS Letters, vol. 556, no. 1–3, pp. 47–52, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  106. M. T. Andrés, M. Acosta-Zaldívar, and J. F. Fierro, “Antifungal mechanism of action of lactoferrin: identification of H+-ATPase (P3A-type) as a new apoptotic-cell membrane receptor,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 60, no. 7, pp. 4206–4216, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  107. V. Cabezón, V. Vialás, A. Gil-Bona et al., “Apoptosis of Candida albicans during the interaction with murine macrophages: proteomics and cell-death marker monitoring,” Journal of Proteome Research, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 1418–1434, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  108. T. Wongsuk, P. Pumeesat, and N. Luplertlop, “Fungal quorum sensing molecules: role in fungal morphogenesis and pathogenicity,” Journal of Basic Microbiology, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 440–447, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  109. T. M. Dinamarco, M. H. S. Goldman, and G. H. Goldman, “Farnesol-induced cell death in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus nidulans,” Biochemical Society Transactions, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 1544–1548, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  110. L. V. Roze and J. E. Linz, “Lovastatin triggers an apoptosis-like cell death process in the fungus Mucor racemosus,” Fungal Genetics and Biology, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 119–133, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  111. K. Krizsán, O. Bencsik, I. Nyilasi, L. Galgóczy, C. Vágvölgyi, and T. Papp, “Effect of the sesterterpene-type metabolites, ophiobolins a and B, on zygomycetes fungi,” FEMS Microbiology Letters, vol. 313, no. 2, pp. 135–140, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  112. F. Shirazi and D. P. Kontoyiannis, “The calcineurin pathway inhibitor tacrolimus enhances the in vitro activity of azoles against Mucorales via apoptosis,” Eukaryotic Cell, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 1225–1234, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  113. J. Yun, J.-S. Hwang, and D. G. Lee, “The antifungal activity of the peptide, periplanetasin-2, derived from American cockroach Periplaneta americana,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 474, no. 17, pp. 3027–3043, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  114. M. T. Andrés, M. Viejo-Díaz, and J. F. Fierro, “Human lactoferrin induces apoptosis-like cell death in Candida albicans: critical role of K+-channel-mediated K+ efflux,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 4081–4088, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  115. N. Y. Yount, D. Kupferwasser, A. Spisni et al., “Selective reciprocity in antimicrobial activity versus cytotoxicity of hBD-2 and crotamine,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 106, no. 35, pp. 14972–14977, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  116. M. Acosta-Zaldívar, M. T. Andrés, A. Rego, C. S. Pereira, J. F. Fierro, and M. Côrte-Real, “Human lactoferrin triggers a mitochondrial- and caspase-dependent regulated cell death in Saccharomyces cerevisiae,” Apoptosis, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 163–173, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  117. S. Vylkova, W. S. Jang, W. Li, N. Nayyar, and M. Edgerton, “Histatin 5 initiates osmotic stress response in Candida albicans via activation of the Hog1 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway,” Eukaryotic Cell, vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 1876–1888, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  118. J. N. Sun, W. Li, W. S. Jang, N. Nayyar, M. D. Sutton, and M. Edgerton, “Uptake of the antifungal cationic peptide Histatin 5 by Candida albicans Ssa2p requires binding to non-conventional sites within the ATPase domain,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 1246–1260, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  119. E. J. Helmerhorst, R. F. Troxler, and F. G. Oppenheim, “The human salivary peptide histatin 5 exerts its antifungal activity through the formation of reactive oxygen species,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 98, no. 25, pp. 14637–14642, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  120. E. J. Helmerhorst, W. van’t Hof, P. Breeuwer et al., “Characterization of histatin 5 with respect to amphipathicity, hydrophobicity, and effects on cell and mitochondrial membrane integrity excludes a candidacidal mechanism of pore formation,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 8, pp. 5643–5649, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  121. D. Wunder, J. Dong, D. Baev, and M. Edgerton, “Human salivary histatin 5 fungicidal action does not induce programmed cell death pathways in Candida albicans,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 110–115, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  122. N. Y. Yount and M. R. Yeaman, “Multidimensional signatures in antimicrobial peptides,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 19, pp. 7363–7368, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  123. M. R. Yeaman and N. Y. Yount, “Unifying themes in host defence effector polypeptides,” Nature Reviews Microbiology, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 727–740, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  124. K. Vriens, T. L. Cools, P. J. Harvey et al., “Synergistic activity of the plant defensin HsAFP1 and caspofungin against Candida albicans biofilms and planktonic cultures,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 8, article e0132701, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  125. T. L. Cools, C. Struyfs, B. P. A. Cammue, and K. Thevissen, “Antifungal plant defensins: increased insight in their mode of action as a basis for their use to combat fungal infections,” Future Microbiology, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 441–454, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  126. K. Thevissen, R. W. Osborn, D. P. Acland, and W. F. Broekaert, “Specific, high affinity binding sites for an antifungal plant defensin on Neurospora crassa hyphae and microsomal membranes,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 272, no. 51, pp. 32176–32181, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  127. K. Thevissen, D. C. Warnecke, I. E. J. A. François et al., “Defensins from insects and plants interact with fungal glucosylceramides,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, no. 6, pp. 3900–3905, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  128. K. Saito, N. Takakuwa, M. Ohnishi, and Y. Oda, “Presence of glucosylceramide in yeast and its relation to alkali tolerance of yeast,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 515–521, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  129. K. Thevissen, P. de Mello Tavares, D. Xu et al., “The plant defensin RsAFP2 induces cell wall stress, septin mislocalization and accumulation of ceramides in Candida albicans,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 166–180, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  130. K. Vriens, T. L. Cools, P. J. Harvey et al., “The radish defensins RsAFP1 and RsAFP2 act synergistically with caspofungin against Candida albicans biofilms,” Peptides, vol. 75, pp. 71–79, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  131. T. L. Cools, K. Vriens, C. Struyfs et al., “The antifungal plant Defensin HsAFP1 is a phosphatidic acid-interacting peptide inducing membrane permeabilization,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 8, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  132. B. M. E. Hayes, M. R. Bleackley, J. L. Wiltshire, M. A. Anderson, A. Traven, and N. L. van der Weerden, “Identification and mechanism of action of the plant defensin NaD1 as a new member of the antifungal drug arsenal against Candida albicans,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 3667–3675, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  133. N. L. van der Weerden, R. E. W. Hancock, and M. A. Anderson, “Permeabilization of fungal hyphae by the plant defensin NaD1 occurs through a cell wall-dependent process,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 48, pp. 37513–37520, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  134. J. R. Soares, E. José Tenório de Melo, M. da Cunha et al., “Interaction between the plant ApDef1 defensin and Saccharomyces cerevisiae results in yeast death through a cell cycle- and caspase-dependent process occurring via uncontrolled oxidative stress,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects, vol. 1861, no. 1, pp. 3429–3443, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  135. M. E. B. Vieira, I. M. Vasconcelos, O. L. T. Machado, V. M. Gomes, and A. d. O. Carvalho, “Isolation, characterization and mechanism of action of an antimicrobial peptide from Lecythis pisonis seeds with inhibitory activity against Candida albicans,” Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 716–729, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  136. J.-S. Hwang, J. Lee, Y.-J. Kim et al., “Isolation and characterization of a defensin-like peptide (coprisin) from the dung beetle, Copris tripartitus,” International Journal of Peptides, vol. 2009, Article ID 136284, 5 pages, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  137. J. K. Kang, J. S. Hwang, H. J. Nam et al., “The insect peptide coprisin prevents Clostridium difficile-mediated acute inflammation and mucosal damage through selective antimicrobial activity,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 55, no. 10, pp. 4850–4857, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  138. J. Lee, J.-S. Hwang, I.-S. Hwang et al., “Coprisin-induced antifungal effects in Candida albicans correlate with apoptotic mechanisms,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 52, no. 11-12, pp. 2302–2311, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  139. L. Kovács, M. Virágh, M. Takó, T. Papp, C. Vágvölgyi, and L. Galgóczy, “Isolation and characterization of Neosartorya fischeri antifungal protein (NFAP),” Peptides, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 1724–1731, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  140. L. Galgóczy, A. Borics, M. Virágh et al., “Structural determinants of Neosartorya fischeri antifungal protein (NFAP) for folding, stability and antifungal activity,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 1963, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  141. M. Hajji, K. Jellouli, N. Hmidet, R. Balti, A. Sellami-Kamoun, and M. Nasri, “A highly thermostable antimicrobial peptide from Aspergillus clavatus ES1: biochemical and molecular characterization,” Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 805–813, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  142. V. Meyer, “A small protein that fights fungi: AFP as a new promising antifungal agent of biotechnological value,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 17–28, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  143. L. Galgóczy, L. Kovács, Z. Karácsony, M. Virágh, Z. Hamari, and C. Vágvölgyi, “Investigation of the antimicrobial effect of Neosartorya fischeri antifungal protein (NFAP) after heterologous expression in Aspergillus nidulans,” Microbiology, vol. 159, Part 2, pp. 411–419, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  144. K. D. Gank, M. R. Yeaman, S. Kojima et al., “SSD1 is integral to host defense peptide resistance in Candida albicans,” Eukaryotic Cell, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 1318–1327, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  145. S.-I. Jung, J. S. Finkel, N. V. Solis et al., “Bcr1 functions downstream of Ssd1 to mediate antimicrobial peptide resistance in Candida albicans,” Eukaryotic Cell, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 411–419, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  146. M. R. Yeaman, “Platelets: at the nexus of antimicrobial defence,” Nature Reviews Microbiology, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 426–437, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  147. N. Y. Yount, A. J. Waring, K. D. Gank, W. H. Welch, D. Kupferwasser, and M. R. Yeaman, “Structural correlates of antimicrobial efficacy in IL-8 and related human kinocidins,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes, vol. 1768, no. 3, pp. 598–608, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  148. M. R. Yeaman, N. Y. Yount, A. J. Waring et al., “Modular determinants of antimicrobial activity in platelet factor-4 family kinocidins,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes, vol. 1768, no. 3, pp. 609–619, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  149. M. R. Yeaman, A. J. Shen, and Center LABRIAH-UM, “Antimicrobial peptides and derived metapeptides,” 2017, https://www.google.com/patents/US9133257. View at: Google Scholar
  150. N. Y. Yount and M. Yeaman, “Antimicrobial kinocidin compositions and methods of use,” 2016, Google Patents, https://www.google.se/patents/US9428566. View at: Google Scholar
  151. N. Y. Yount and M. R. Yeaman, “Emerging themes and therapeutic prospects for anti-infective peptides,” Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 337–360, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  152. R. E. W. Hancock, E. F. Haney, and E. E. Gill, “The immunology of host defence peptides: beyond antimicrobial activity,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 321–334, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  153. S. Chaili, S. Filler, N. Yount et al., “SSD1 modulates pathways of cell response enabling Candida albicans resistance to host defense peptides,” in 53rd Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents & Chemotherapy, Denver, CO, USA, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  154. C. Park and D. G. Lee, “Melittin induces apoptotic features in Candida albicans,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 394, no. 1, pp. 170–172, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  155. E. Leiter, H. Szappanos, C. Oberparleiter et al., “Antifungal protein PAF severely affects the integrity of the plasma membrane of Aspergillus nidulans and induces an apoptosis-like phenotype,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 2445–2453, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  156. G. Qi, F. Zhu, P. Du et al., “Lipopeptide induces apoptosis in fungal cells by a mitochondria-dependent pathway,” Peptides, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 1978–1986, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  157. A. I. Pozniakovsky, D. A. Knorre, O. V. Markova, A. A. Hyman, V. P. Skulachev, and F. F. Severin, “Role of mitochondria in the pheromone- and amiodarone-induced programmed death of yeast,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 168, no. 2, pp. 257–269, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  158. B. Hwang, J.-S. Hwang, J. Lee, and D. G. Lee, “The antimicrobial peptide, psacotheasin induces reactive oxygen species and triggers apoptosis in Candida albicans,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 405, no. 2, pp. 267–271, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  159. R. Klassen and F. Meinhardt, “Induction of DNA damage and apoptosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by a yeast killer toxin,” Cellular Microbiology, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 393–401, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  160. K. De Brucker, B. P. A. Cammue, and K. Thevissen, “Apoptosis-inducing antifungal peptides and proteins,” Biochemical Society Transactions, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 1527–1532, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  161. A. Matejuk, Q. Leng, M. D. Begum et al., “Peptide-based antifungal therapies against emerging infections,” Drugs of the Future, vol. 35, no. 3, p. 197, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  162. S.-J. Kang, S. J. Park, T. Mishig-Ochir, and B.-J. Lee, “Antimicrobial peptides: therapeutic potentials,” Expert Review of Anti-Infective Therapy, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 1477–1486, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  163. M. Mahlapuu, J. Håkansson, L. Ringstad, and C. Björn, “Antimicrobial peptides: an emerging category of therapeutic agents,” Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, vol. 6, p. 194, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  164. P. M. Tavares, K. Thevissen, B. P. A. Cammue et al., “In vitro activity of the antifungal plant defensin RsAFP2 against Candida isolates and its in vivo efficacy in prophylactic murine models of candidiasis,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 4522–4525, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  165. Z. Palicz, T. Gáll, É. Leiter et al., “Application of a low molecular weight antifungal protein from Penicillium chrysogenum (PAF) to treat pulmonary aspergillosis in mice,” Emerging Microbes & Infections, vol. 5, no. 11, article e114, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  166. M. R. Yeaman, D. Cheng, B. Desai et al., “Susceptibility to thrombin-induced platelet microbicidal protein is associated with increased fluconazole efficacy against experimental endocarditis due to Candida albicans,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 3051–3056, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  167. T. L. Cools, C. Struyfs, J. W. Drijfhout et al., “A linear 19-mer plant defensin-derived peptide acts synergistically with caspofungin against Candida albicans biofilms,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 8, p. 2051, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  168. C. D. Fjell, J. A. Hiss, R. E. W. Hancock, and G. Schneider, “Designing antimicrobial peptides: form follows function,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 37–51, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  169. R. E. W. Hancock and H.-G. Sahl, “Antimicrobial and host-defense peptides as new anti-infective therapeutic strategies,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 1551–1557, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  170. N. Y. Yount and M. R. Yeaman, “Structural congruence among membrane-active host defense polypeptides of diverse phylogeny,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes, vol. 1758, no. 9, pp. 1373–1386, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  171. J. Aarbiou, G. S. Tjabringa, R. M. Verhoosel et al., “Mechanisms of cell death induced by the neutrophil antimicrobial peptides α-defensins and LL-37,” Inflammation Research, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 119–127, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  172. S. Zhu, S. Peigneur, B. Gao, Y. Umetsu, S. Ohki, and J. Tytgat, “Experimental conversion of a defensin into a neurotoxin: implications for origin of toxic function,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 546–559, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  173. K. Vriens, S. Peigneur, B. De Coninck, J. Tytgat, B. P. A. Cammue, and K. Thevissen, “The antifungal plant defensin AtPDF2.3 from Arabidopsis thaliana blocks potassium channels,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, article 32121, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  174. X. S. Li, M. S. Reddy, D. Baev, and M. Edgerton, “Candida albicans Ssa1/2p is the cell envelope binding protein for human salivary histatin 5,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 31, pp. 28553–28561, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  175. K. El-Mounadi, K. T. Islam, P. Hernández-Ortiz, N. D. Read, and D. M. Shah, “Antifungal mechanisms of a plant defensin MtDef4 are not conserved between the ascomycete fungi Neurospora crassa and Fusarium graminearum,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 542–559, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  176. M. R. Yeaman, N. Y. Yount, and E. P. Brass, “Peptides and methods for inducing cell death,” Tech. Rep., Google Patents, 2013, Available from: https://www.google.se/patents/US8492333. View at: Google Scholar
  177. M. R. Yeaman, N. Y. Yount, and E. P. Brass, “Peptides and methods for inducing cell death,” Tech. Rep., US9562083 B2, 2017, http://www.google.se/patents/US9562083. View at: Google Scholar
  178. N. Y. Yount and M. R. Yeaman, “Immunocontinuum: perspectives in antimicrobial peptide mechanisms of action and resistance,” Protein & Peptide Letters, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 49–67, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  179. N. Y. Yount, S. E. Cohen, D. Kupferwasser et al., “Context mediates antimicrobial efficacy of kinocidin congener peptide RP-1,” PLoS One, vol. 6, no. 11, article e26727, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  180. R. Lakshminarayanan, S. Liu, J. Li et al., “Synthetic multivalent antifungal peptides effective against fungi,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 2, article e87730, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  181. A. Falanga, L. Lombardi, G. Franci et al., “Marine antimicrobial peptides: nature provides templates for the design of novel compounds against pathogenic bacteria,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 17, no. 12, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  182. H.-K. Kang, C. Kim, C. H. Seo, and Y. Park, “The therapeutic applications of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs): a patent review,” Journal of Microbiology, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  183. O. Nešuta, M. Budešínský, R. Hadravová, L. Monincová, J. Humpolicková, and V. Cerovský, “How proteases from Enterococcus faecalis contribute to its resistance to short α-helical antimicrobial peptides,” Pathogens and Disease, vol. 75, no. 7, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  184. P. V. Panteleev, S. V. Balandin, V. T. Ivanov, and T. V. Ovchinnikova, “A therapeutic potential of animal β-hairpin antimicrobial peptides,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 24, no. 17, pp. 1724–1746, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  185. J. Wiesner and A. Vilcinskas, “Antimicrobial peptides: the ancient arm of the human immune system,” Virulence, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 440–464, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  186. Y. Q. Tang, J. Yuan, G. Osapay et al., “A cyclic antimicrobial peptide produced in primate leukocytes by the ligation of two truncated α-defensins,” Science, vol. 286, no. 5439, pp. 498–502, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  187. S. D. Ramalho, M. E. F. Pinto, D. Ferreira, and V. S. Bolzani, “Biologically active orbitides from the Euphorbiaceae family,” Planta Medica, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  188. C. Steiniger, S. Hoffmann, A. Mainz et al., “Harnessing fungal nonribosomal cyclodepsipeptide synthetases for mechanistic insights and tailored engineering,” Chemical Science, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 7834–7843, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  189. K. D. James, C. P. Laudeman, N. B. Malkar, R. Krishnan, and K. Polowy, “Structure-activity relationships of a series of echinocandins and the discovery of CD101, a highly stable and soluble echinocandin with distinctive pharmacokinetic properties,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. e01541–e01516, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  190. T. Thery, Y. O’Callaghan, N. O’Brien, and E. K. Arendt, “Optimisation of the antifungal potency of the amidated peptide H-Orn-Orn-Trp-Trp-NH2 against food contaminants,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 265, pp. 40–48, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  191. N. Y. Yount, K. D. Gank, Y. Q. Xiong et al., “Platelet microbicidal protein 1: structural themes of a multifunctional antimicrobial peptide,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 48, no. 11, pp. 4395–4404, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  192. M. R. Yeaman, N. Y. Yount, J. E. Edwards Jr., and E. P. Brass, “Multifunctional context-activated protides and methods of use,” 2013, US8592375 B2, http://www.google.ch/patents/US8592375. View at: Google Scholar
  193. L. R. S. Gazzaneo, V. Pandolfi, A. L. S. de Jesus, S. Crovella, A. M. Benko-Iseppon, and A. C. de Freitas, “Heterologous expression systems for plant defensin expression: examples of success and pitfalls,” Current Protein & Peptide Science, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 391–399, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  194. K. Vriens, B. P. A. Cammue, and K. Thevissen, “Antifungal plant defensins: mechanisms of action and production,” Molecules, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 12280–12303, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  195. C. Sonderegger, L. Galgóczy, S. Garrigues et al., “A Penicillium chrysogenum-based expression system for the production of small, cysteine-rich antifungal proteins for structural and functional analyses,” Microbial Cell Factories, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 192, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  196. P. H. Mygind, R. L. Fischer, K. M. Schnorr et al., “Plectasin is a peptide antibiotic with therapeutic potential from a saprophytic fungus,” Nature, vol. 437, no. 7061, pp. 975–980, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  197. S. S. Usmani, G. Bedi, J. S. Samuel et al., “THPdb: database of FDA-approved peptide and protein therapeutics,” PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 7, article e0181748, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2018 Michael R. Yeaman et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.