4-Carbomethoxyl-10-Epigyrosanoldie E Extracted from Cultured Soft Coral <i>Sinularia sandensis</i> Induced Apoptosis and Autophagy via ROS and Mitochondrial Dysfunction and ER Stress in Oral Cancer Cells

She, Yun-Ying; Lin, Jen-Jie; Su, Jui-Hsin; Chang, Ting-Shou; Wu, Yu-Jen

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3017807

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 3017807 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3017807

4-Carbomethoxyl-10-Epigyrosanoldie E Extracted from Cultured Soft Coral Sinularia sandensis Induced Apoptosis and Autophagy via ROS and Mitochondrial Dysfunction and ER Stress in Oral Cancer Cells

Yun-Ying She,¹Jen-Jie Lin,^2,3Jui-Hsin Su,⁴Ting-Shou Chang,¹and Yu-Jen Wu^2,3

Academic Editor: Mateusz Maciejczyk

Received30 Jun 2022

Accepted03 Oct 2022

Published13 Oct 2022

Abstract

Oral cancer is a malignant neoplasia that is more common in Asian than other regions, and men are at higher risk than women. Currently, clinical treatment for oral cancer consists of radiation therapy combined with chemotherapy. Therefore, it is important to find a drug that can inhibit the growth of cancer cells more effectively and safely. In this study, we examined the cytotoxicity of 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E extracted from cultured soft coral Sinularia sandensis towards oral cancer cells. MTT cell proliferation and colony formation assays were used to evaluate cell survival, and immunofluorescence staining and Western blotting were employed to analyze the effects of 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E on apoptosis and autophagy. 4-Carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E treatment also induced the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which are associated with 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E-induced cell death. In addition, the 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E-induced antiproliferation effects on Ca9-22 and Cal-27 cells were associated with the release of cytochrome c from mitochondria, activation of proapoptotic proteins (such as caspase-3/-9, Bax, and Bad), and inhibition of antiapoptotic proteins (Bcl-2, Bcl-xl, and Mcl-1). 4-Carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E treatment also triggered endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, leading to activation of the PERK/elF2α/ATF4/CHOP apoptotic pathway. Moreover, increased expressions of Beclin-1, Atg3, Atg5, Atg7, Atg12, Atg 16, LC3-I, and LC3-II proteins indicated that 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E triggered autophagy in oral cancer cells. In conclusion, our findings demonstrated that 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E suppressed human oral cancer cell proliferation and should be further investigated with regard to its potential use as a chemotherapy drug for the treatment of human oral cancer.

1. Introduction

Oral cancer most often occurs in men over 40 years of age, and more than 95% of cases are derived from the oral mucosal epithelium as squamous cell carcinoma, verrucous carcinoma, adenoid cystic carcinoma, or mucinous epidermis-like carcinoma, among which oral squamous cell carcinoma is the most common. The main causes of oral cancer are betel nut-chewing, alcohol consumption, smoking, poor oral hygiene habits, and viral infections [1, 2]. In Taiwan, approximately 90% of oral cancer patients have the habit of chewing betel nut. According to the 2015 report from the Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan, oral cancer ranked the fifth leading cause of death from malignant tumors in Taiwan [3, 4].

Early treatment of oral cancer can result in a 5-year survival rate of up to 80%, while late diagnosis and treatment can reduce the survival rate to 30% and lead to a high risk of recurrence [5, 6]. Current clinical treatment for oral cancer mostly consists of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) [7], and the most commonly used chemotherapeutic drug is 5-Fu. However, side effects caused by 5-Fu include gastrointestinal symptoms such as loss of appetite, stomatitis, vomiting, and diarrhea, in addition to decreased white blood cells and abnormal liver function, which often cause difficulties in treatment. Thus, it is particularly important to identify safe complementary drugs for CCRT [8, 9].

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are active molecules containing oxygen and are natural by-products of the normal metabolism of oxygen. ROS play an important role in cellular signaling and homeostasis in the body [10]. However, cellular stress caused by changes in the external environment may dramatically increase the concentration of ROS in cells, causing significant damage to the cellular structure and resulting in oxidative damage [11, 12]. Previous studies have shown that apoptosis is accompanied by an increase in the expression of ROS, which causes damage to polyunsaturated fatty acids in the cell membrane and further leads to mutations in the nucleotides of DNA. Therefore, ROS are an indicator of cellular stress of cells in apoptosis [13].

The process of apoptosis can be triggered by either extrinsic or intrinsic pathways in the cell. Intrinsic pathways are triggered by the intracellular signaling pathway, which involves interactions between endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and mitochondria [14, 15]. The ER is responsible for protein synthesis and protein folding. When cells are under stress (inflammation, oxidation, and hypoxia), Ca²⁺ homeostasis in the ER is disrupted, resulting in the accumulation of unfolded or misfolded proteins in the inner lumen of the ER, which leads to ER stress. In response to ER stress, cells activate a series of signaling pathways, also referred to as the unfolded protein response (UPR). If the UPR cannot improve the condition of the cells in time, the ER will activate apoptosis, causing self-destruction to reduce stress [16].

Mitochondrial dysfunction has been shown to be a major cause of apoptosis due to dysregulation of Bcl-2 family homeostasis and alteration of the mitochondrial membrane potential, leading to the release of cytochrome c from the mitochondrial intermembrane space to the cytosol [17]. Mitochondrial dysfunction promotes a series of reactions, beginning with the activation of caspase-9, which further activates downstream caspase-3; activated caspase-3 then cleaves and activates poly ADP-ribose polymerase 1 (PARP1), which subsequently leads to apoptosis [18, 19].

In addition, autophagy is a cellular metabolic pathway that allows cells to break down their own organelles or other intracellular materials by lysosomes, which is currently considered to be an important mechanism in the regulation of cell growth, differentiation, and cellular and tissue homeostasis. At the end of apoptosis, initiation of autophagy occurs when phagocytes recognize the exposure of phosphatidylserine (PS) on the outer plasma membrane of target cells [20].

Compounds isolated from soft corals have been shown to have the ability to induce apoptosis in cancer cells. In the present study, we analyzed 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E, a compound obtained from soft coral Sinularia sandensis, with regard to its effects on the induction of ROS production, mitochondrial dysfunction, and ER stress in oral cancer cells. We further investigated the mechanism of its cytotoxicity leading to apoptosis and autophagy. The results of this study will be important in terms of the potential development of 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E as a new drug for the treatment of cancer.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Reagents Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), trypsin-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, fetal bovine serum (FBS), and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) were obtained from Biowest (Nuaillé, France). Polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes, goat anti-rabbit, and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated immunoglobulin (Ig) G were obtained from Millipore (Billerica, MA, USA). Protease inhibitor cocktail, DMSO, salubrinal (Sal), 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), ROS Green Flow Cytometry Assay Kit, Z-DEVD-FMK (caspase-3 inhibitor), Z-LEHD-FMK (caspase-9 inhibitor), 3-methyladenine (3-MA), and rabbit anti-human β-actin antibodies were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). Cell extraction RIPA buffer was obtained from TOOLS (Taiwan). Enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) Western blotting reagents were obtained from Pierce Biotechnology (Rockford, IL, USA). Antibodies against Beclin-1, LC3-I, LC3-II, Atg3, Atg5, Atg7, Atg12, and Atg16 were obtained from Epitomics (Burlingame, CA, USA). Antibodies against procaspase 3, cleaved-caspase 3, procaspase 9, cleaved-caspase 9, cytochrome c, Bax, Bad, p-Bad, Bcl-2, Bcl-xl, Mcl-1, GRP78, CALR, elF2α, p-elF2α, IRE1α, PERK, p-PERK, ATF4, ATF6-f, CHOP, and PARP1 were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA).

2.2. Chemical Structure of 4-Carbomethoxyl-10-Epigyrosanoldie E

Natural product 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E was isolated from cultured soft coral Sinularia sandensis by Dr. Jui-Hsin Su (Figure 1).

2.3. Cell Culture

Ca9-22 and Cal-27 oral cancer cells were purchased from the Food Industry Research and Development Institute (Hsinchu, Taiwan) and grown in DMEM, 4 mM L-glutamine, 10% () FBS, 100 μg/mL streptomycin, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 1 mM sodium pyruvate in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO₂ in air at 37°C.

2.4. Cell MTT Assay

Ca9-22 and Cal-27 cells were seeded on 24-well culture plates at a density of cells/well. After incubation with various concentrations of 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E for 24 hr, 50 μL of MTT solution (1 mg/mL in PBS) were added to each well. Cells treated with DMSO were used as a blank control. The cell culture plates were incubated at 37°C for 4 hr, following which cells were lysed with 200 μL DMSO. The optical density (OD) was measured at 595 nm using a microtiter ELISA reader (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). All experiments were repeated three times. We followed the methods of Lin et al. [21].

2.5. Clonogenic Assay

Cells were seeded at in a 6-well plate. After the addition of 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E at various concentrations to the cells, the cultures were maintained in a 5% CO₂ incubator at 37°C for 14 days. Thereafter, 0.1% crystal violet was added to stain the cells for 15 minutes, followed by washing three times with PBS. Images of the cells were then obtained using a scanner for subsequent analysis of cell colonies.

2.6. DAPI and TUNEL Staining

Cells ( cells/well) seeded in a 12-well plate were treated with 10, 15, or 20 μM 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E for 24 hr, and DMSO was used as the control. Cells in each treatment and control group were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS solution for 15 min and stained by DAPI according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The DeadEnd™ Fluorometric TUNEL System (Promega) was used to detect nuclear DNA fragmentation according to the manufacturer’s manual. The cells were photographed under a fluorescence microscope.

2.7. Protein Extraction and Estimation

Cells were treated with different concentrations of 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E and incubated for 24 hr, following which a cell extraction buffer was used to accomplish lysis and protein extraction. After centrifugation at 12000 rpm for 10 minutes, Bradford dye (Bio-Rad) was added to the supernatant for protein quantification.

2.8. Western Blotting Analysis

The treated samples and control samples (25 μg) were separated by 12.5% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto a PVDF membrane for 1.5 hr at 400 mA using Transphor TE 62 (Hoeffer). The membranes were subsequently incubated with 5% dehydrated skimmed milk in PBS (10 mM NaH₂PO₄, 130 mM NaCl) to block nonspecific protein binding, and then incubated with primary antibodies at 4°C overnight. After washing with PBST 5 times (PBS with 0.002% tween 80), the secondary antibody (horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit, 1 : 7000 in blocking solution) was added, followed by incubation for 2 hr at 4°C, and finally, visualization was performed using chemiluminesence (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL, USA). We followed the methods of Lin et al. [21].

2.9. ROS Analysis

Cells ( cells/well) seeded in a 6-well plate were treated with 5, 10, 15, or 20 μM 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E for 4 hr. Then, 1 μL of 10 μM dichlorofluorescin diacetate (DCFH-DA; Sigma, USA) was added to the wells in the dark, and after mixing and reacting for 15 minutes, changes in the level of H₂O₂ in the cells were assessed using a flow cytometer (FACStar Plus) at wavelengths of 488 and 530 nm [22].

2.10. Statistical Analysis

Cell viability assay and colony assay data and ROS measurements were collected from three independent experiments and analyzed using Student’s -test (Sigma-Stat2.0, San Rafael, CA, USA). Results with were considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Effect of 4-Carbomethoxyl-10-Epigyrosanoldie E on Cell Proliferation

An MTT assay was used to evaluate the cytotoxicity of 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E on Ca9-22 and Cal-27 oral cancer cell lines. The results showed that in cells treated with different concentrations of 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E (2.5-25 μM) for 24 hr, a dose-dependent cytotoxicity was observed. When the concentration of 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E was increased to 20 μM, the cell survival rate was still approximately 60% (Figure 2(a)). In order to avoid including cells with a low viability under a high 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E concentration that may undergo cell death not relative to apoptosis, concentrations of 0~20 μM were chosen for use in subsequent experiments.

(a)

(b)

(c)

Cytotoxicity and morphology analyses showed that 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E inhibited cell proliferation in Ca9-22 and Cal-27 cells (Figure 2(b)). In order to verify the results, Ca9-22 and Cal-27 cells were subjected to colony formation analysis with 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E treatment (5, 10, 15, and 20 μM) for 2 weeks. The results showed that cell proliferation was decreased with increased concentrations of 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E (Figure 2(c)).

3.2. Apoptosis in Oral Cancer Cells Induced by 4-Carbomethoxyl-10-Epigyrosanoldie E

As the mechanism by which 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E inhibits cell growth has not been studied, we therefore investigated whether 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E causes apoptosis in Ca9-22 and Cal-27 cells using TUNEL/DAPI staining. DNA fragmentation was observed in cells incubated with 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E for 24 hr, and the ratio of DNA fragmentation was increased with increased concentrations of 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E, suggesting that this treatment caused apoptosis in both Ca9-22 and Cal-27 cells (Figure 3).

3.3. ROS Production Induced by 4-Carbomethoxyl-10-Epigyrosanoldie E

ROS are highly reactive and may attack molecules in cells to trigger a sequential free-radical reaction. Under normal physiologic conditions, ROS perform normal cellular functions; however, excessive ROS production may cause increased oxidation of DNA, lipids, and proteins, resulting in cellular damage. Evidence suggests that ROS act as secondary messengers, activating transcription factors, and are associated with genes that induce inflammatory responses [23, 24]. In addition, ROS play a role in the mechanism of cell death [25].

ROS may also be involved in early regulation of the apoptotic process, contributing to mitochondrial membrane depolarization, Bax relocalization, cytochrome c release, caspase activation, and DNA fragmentation [26, 27]. Therefore, we used flow cytometry to measure the changes in the ROS level in cells treated with 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E and found that ROS production was increased with increased concentrations of 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E. The results indicated that 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E induced ROS production and caused oxidative stress in cells, which in turn promoted the occurrence of apoptosis (Figure 4).

(a)

(b)

3.4. Analysis of the Mechanism of Mitochondrial Dysfunction Induced by 4-Carbomethoxyl-10-Epigyrosanoldie E

Western blotting analysis showed that the homeostasis between Bcl-2 and Bax in Ca9-22 and Cal-27 cells was disrupted at 24 hr after 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E treatment. The expressions of antiapoptotic proteins Bcl-2, Bcl-xl, Mcl-1, and p-Bad were reduced, while the expressions of proapoptotic proteins Bad and Bax were increased (Figure 5(a)). The level of cytochrome c was also increased, and its release into cytosol induced the activation of caspase family proteins. In particular, caspase-3 and caspase-9 are the major players in apoptosis. The increased expressions of cleaved caspase-3 and caspase-9, the activated state of caspases, showed that the apoptotic response was initiated by 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E treatment. The process further caused an increase in the expression of PARP-1, leading to blockage of DNA synthesis and cell death. On the other hand, by adding inhibitors of caspase-3 and caspase-9 (Z-DEVD-FMK and Z-LEHD-FMK), 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E-induced cell death was inhibited, suggesting that caspase-3 and caspase-9 are involved in the mitochondrial dysfunction (Figure 5(b)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

3.5. Effect of 4-Carbomethoxyl-10-Epigyrosanoldie E on Apoptosis Induced by Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress

Subsequently, we studied the changes in ER marker proteins and downstream pathways using Western blotting. Calreticulin (CALR) is a molecular chaperone that regulates ER Ca²⁺ homeostasis and binds to misfolded proteins. Alterations in the CALR level may cause ER stress and a UPR, which in turn induce apoptosis [28]. Generation of a UPR will cause GRP78 cleavage and induce the PERK/eIF2α/ATF4/CHOP signaling pathway, in addition to triggering the activations of ATF6 and IRE1α (the other two main proximal effectors of the UPR), synergistically initiating downstream signaling pathways [29]. Our results demonstrated that 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E increased the expression of CALR in the cells, leading to an increased expression of GRP78, which further upregulated the expressions of downstream molecules p-PERK, p-eIF2α, and ATF4. Increases in the expressions of IRE1α and ATF6 increased the CHOP level to induce apoptosis in the cells. The results suggested that the apoptotic mechanism is generated via the PERK/eIF2α/ATF4/CHOP signaling pathway in the ER (Figure 6(a)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

We also utilized an inhibitor of eIF2α phosphatase, salubrinal, to validate the involvement of the signaling pathway in 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E-induced apoptosis. As shown in Figure 6(b), the results of an MMT assay revealed that salubrinal reduced the apoptosis caused by 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E, indicating that ER stress occurred in the cells treated with 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E.

3.6. Auotophagy Caused by 4-Carbomethoxyl-10-Epigyrosanoldie E

Several studies have shown that natural compounds isolated from plants may cause cell death in cancer cells through autophagy [30, 31]. In the present study, we found that the protein expressions of Beclin-1, Atg3, Atg7, Atg5, Atg12, and Atg16 in Ca9-22 and Cal-27 cells were increased with increased concentrations of 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E, and the levels of LC3-I and LC3-II, the main structural proteins of autophagosomal membranes, were also increased (Figure 7(a)). Additionally, when autophagic inhibitor 3-methyladenine (3-MA) was employed, suppression of LC3-I and LC3-II expressions was observed (Figure 7(b)). It can be inferred from these findings that 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E may promote the occurrence of autophagy in oral cancer cells.

(a)

(b)

4. Discussion

The search for effective drugs obtained from natural products has long been the goal of many scientists. Many effective drugs have been developed in the past from natural products, such as Oncovin, Taxol, Navelbine, and Vumon, and some water-soluble camptothecin analogues (e.g., Hycamtin) [32]. Previous studies have shown that compounds extracted from soft corals exert anticancer activities, causing cytotoxicity towards cells via the regulation of multiple cell signaling pathways. Previously, we discovered that 11-epi-sinulariolide acetate from soft coral Sinularia flexibilis exerts a cytotoxic effect on hepatocellular carcinoma cells through ER stress and mitochondrial dysfunction [33]. In this study, we found that 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E isolated from Sinularia sandensis possesses the ability to induce apoptosis in oral cancer cells and revealed the mechanisms involved.

Apoptosis is a programmed cell death triggered by a series of changes in external factors (i.e., extracellular stimuli) or internal signals (e.g., DNA damage, ER stress, and increased ROS level). Our results showed that 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E at 20 μM inhibited cell growth of Ca9-22 and Cal-27 cells by approximately 40% after 24 hr of treatment (Figure 2), and both cell density and morphology were affected by the treatment. TUNEL/DAPI staining showed that higher concentrations of 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E resulted in increased fluorescence signals due to nucleic acid breakage, indicating that 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E induced apoptosis in the cells (Figure 3).

Oxygen is an important molecule for living organisms. By accepting free electrons, it generates reactive oxygen molecules, named ROS or free radicals [34, 35]. ROS are molecules with unpaired electrons, which are unstable free radicals seeking other atoms or molecules to bond with. In the process, they will attack important molecules in cells, including nucleic acids, proteins, and enzymes [36]. In living organisms, oxygen molecules undergo transfer of electrons to produce superoxide anions, which form hydrogen peroxide and then hydroxyl radicals. If the excess production of free radicals cannot be relieved in time, oxidative stress can lead to downstream apoptosis in cells [37, 38]. Therefore, in order to verify that intracellular stress existed in the cells, we used flow cytometry to examine the changes in the levels of ROS in oral cancer cell lines in response to 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E treatment. We found that the ROS level increased with an increasing 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E concentration (Figure 4), suggesting that 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E induces downstream apoptotic signals through inducing oxidative stress in oral cancer cells.

Apoptosis occurs normally in cells during development and aging and may represent a new therapeutic strategy to inform the development of cancer treatment. Apoptosis is regulated by a proteolytic system involving caspase family proteins. Upon receipt of signals of cell death, activation of procaspases results in activated caspases and triggers a series of caspase downstream reactions, which in turn trigger downstream enzymes to damage DNA and cause cell death. Caspases are classified into initiator caspases and executioner caspases; the former include caspase-8, caspase-9, and casaspse-10, which can trigger proteolysis, followed by activation of executioners caspase-3, caspase-6, and caspase-7. Activation of executioner caspases results in a series of protein degradation reactions that lead to apoptotic events [39]. Bcl-2 family proteins have the function to regulate apoptosis and can be classified into three groups: multidomain effectors (e.g., Bax, Bak), BH3-only proteins (e.g., Bad, Bid, and PUMA), and antiapoptotic proteins (e.g., Bcl-2, Bcl-xl, and Mcl-1) [40, 41]. The two main pathways triggered in apoptosis are extrinsic and intrinsic pathways [42, 43]. Induction of the intrinsic pathway occurs when intracellular stress is present in organelles, including mitochondria and the ER. Studies have indicated that mitochondrial dysfunction plays an important role in apoptosis. Bax activation is the key in mitochondria-dependent apoptosis. Under stress conditions, Bax enters the outer membrane of mitochondria, and the permeability of the mitochondrial membrane increases with the formation of nonselective pores in the inner membrane, causing a loss of mitochondrial membrane potential () [44]. Additionally, an increase in the ratio of Bax/Bcl-2 stimulates the release of cytochrome c and AIF proteins from the inner membrane of the mitochondria into the cytosol, which causes cytochrome c to bind to ARAF-1 and activate caspase-3. Activated caspase-3 then cleaves its receptor poly (ADP-ribose) and polymerase 1 (PARP-1), causing apoptotic events such as chromosome condensation and DNA breakage [45]. In the present study, Western blotting analysis showed that increased concentrations of 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E resulted in increasing disruption of the homeostasis between Bcl-2 and Bax in Ca9-22 and Cal-27 cells, which led to increases in the expressions of proapoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins Bad and Bax and inhibition of anti-apoptotic proteins Bcl2, Bcl-xl, p-Bad, and Mcl-1. During the process, the expressions of cytochrome c (cytosolic), activated caspase-3 and caspase-9 (cleaved caspase-3 and 9), and PARP-1 were also increased (Figure 5(a)). The aforementioned results indicated that alteration of mitochondrial activity regulates the occurrence of apoptosis in the cells. Moreover, the addition of caspase-3 and caspase-9 inhibitors increased the cell survival rate (Figure 5(b)), which further suggested that the apoptotic effect of 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E on Ca9-22 and Cal-27 cells is regulated by mitochondrial dysfunction and caspase activation.

The ER is a specialized organelle that is extremely sensitive to environmental stress. When cells are under stress, the ER triggers a stress-related response to evade immediate cell dysfunction. The key step in protein maturation occurs in the ER, where proteins are modified to form their proper tertiary structure by ER-resident enzymes and chaperones. Cellular stress induced by the abnormal accumulation of unfolded or misfolded proteins in the ER, referred to as the UPR, may result in cell damage [46]. The UPR is a cellular response to remove cellular stress and can therefore be considered as a mitigation action by the cell prior to apoptosis, which if not eliminated can lead to cell death [47, 48]. We found that the increase in CALR after 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E treatment led to an increase in the Ca²+ concentration in the cytosol and triggered ER stress; this then induced the expression of GRP78, which further triggered the downstream pathway that increased the expressions of p-PERK, p-eIF2α, and ATF4 in a dose-response manner related to the concentration of 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E. In addition, alterations of IRE1α and ATF6 and an increasing trend in CHOP were observed, suggesting that this pathway is involved in 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E-induced apoptosis (Figure 6(a)). We also observed that salubrinal rescued cell survival in cells treated with 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E alone (Figure 6(b)), which confirmed the hypothesis that 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E initiated ER stress and consequently induced apoptosis in oral cancer cells. These results indicated that 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E can induce apoptosis via the PERK/eIF2α/ATF4/CHOP delivery pathway.

Autophagy is an evolutionary conserved catabolic process that eliminates damaged organelles, misfolded proteins, and invading organisms. Previous studies have suggested that autophagy is also related to cellular stress adaptation, eliminating aging cells under normal conditions and helping to inhibit inflammatory responses under specific cellular stresses. This process is regulated by a variety of lipids and autophagy proteins (Atg), which eventually accumulate into autophagosomes and carry the materials to be broken down to lysosomes, where they are broken down to form amino acids and other substances. Therefore, the proteins involved in autophagy determine the efficiency of the overall cellular metabolism, and may represent an index of cellular response to stress-induced inflammation [49, 50]. The results of the current study showed that the expression of Beclin-1 in the cells increased with an increasing concentration of 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E, indicating that the autophagosome precursors in the initial stage were activated. Therefore, the expressions of Atg3, Atg7, Atg5, Atg12, and Atg16 were also increased, which led to amplified expressions of LC3-I an LC3-II. Moreover, the addition of autophagy inhibitor 3-MA reduced the 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E-induced cytotoxicity and the amounts of LC3-I and LC3-II in Ca9-22 and Cal-27 cells (Figure 7). As a result, we can confirm that 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E induces autophagosomes in oral cancer cells, eventually leading to autophagy.

5. Conclusion

4-Carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E, a compound isolated from soft coral Sinularia sandensis, was found to induce ROS production in oral cancer cells, leading to the initiation of multiple cellular pathways; these include the apoptotic pathway triggered by ER stress and mitochondrial dysfunction and ultimately cause initiation of autophagy. Our results confirmed that 4-carbomethoxyl-10-epigyrosanoldie E has an excellent activity in inhibiting oral cancer cells and may have the potential to be developed as an effective anticancer drug for the treatment of oral cancers.

Data Availability

Data generated or analyzed during this study are provided in full within the published article.

Conflicts of Interest

All of the authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Y.-J.W. conceived and designed the experiments. J.-H.S. isolated and identified the compound. Y.-Y.S., J.-J.L., and T.-S.C. performed the experiments and analyzed the data. Y.-Y.S. and Y.-J.W. wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by research grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST 108-2320-B-276-001) to Y.-J.W. and research grants from the Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital (VGHMHU109-003) to Y.-Y.S.

References

D. Sano and J. N. Myers, “Metastasis of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue,” Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, vol. 26, no. 3-4, pp. 645–662, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. T. Bau, H. C. Tseng, C. H. Wang et al., “Oral cancer and genetic polymorphism of DNA double strand break gene Ku70 in Taiwan,” Oral Oncology, vol. 44, no. 11, pp. 1047–1051, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Y. Kao and E. Lim, “An overview of detection and screening of oral cancer in Taiwan,” The Chinese Journal of Dental Research, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 7–12, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Huang and H. E. Liu, “Effectiveness of cosmetic rehabilitation on the body image of oral cancer patients in Taiwan,” Support Care Cancer, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 981–986, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. G. de Lima, R. C. Villar, G. de Castro Jr. et al., “Oral mucositis prevention by low-level laser therapy in head-and-neck cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy: a phase III randomized study,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 270–275, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Tangthongkum, V. Kirtsreesakul, P. Supanimitjaroenporn, and P. Leelasawatsuk, “Treatment outcome of advance staged oral cavity cancer: concurrent chemoradiotherapy compared with primary surgery,” European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, vol. 274, no. 6, pp. 2567–2572, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Sato, Y. Hayashi, K. Watanabe, R. Yoshimi, and H. Hibi, “Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with intravenous cisplatin and docetaxel for advanced oral cancer,” Nagoya Journal of Medical Science, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 407–414, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Topuz, D. Derin, G. Can et al., “Effect of oral administration of kefir on serum proinflammatory cytokines on 5-FU induced oral mucositis in patients with colorectal cancer,” Investigational New Drugs, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 567–572, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Mahlberg, S. Lorenzen, P. Thuss-Patience, V. Heinemann, P. Pfeiffer, and M. Möhler, “New perspectives in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer: S-1 as a novel oral 5-FU therapy in combination with cisplatin,” Chemotherapy, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 62–70, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Whittington, S. C. Harrison, K. M. Williams et al., “Reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and the outcome of diagnostic tests of sperm function,” International Journal of Andrology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 236–242, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. P. Joselin, S. J. Hewitt, S. M. Callaghan et al., “ROS-dependent regulation of Parkin and DJ-1 localization during oxidative stress in neurons,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 21, no. 22, pp. 4888–4903, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Mehterov, S. Balazadeh, J. Hille, V. Toneva, B. Mueller-Roeber, and T. Gechev, “Oxidative stress provokes distinct transcriptional responses in the stress- tolerant atr7 and stress-sensitive loh2 Arabidopsis thaliana mutants as revealed by multi-parallel quantitative real-time PCR analysis of ROS marker and antioxidant genes,” Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 59, pp. 20–29, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Y. Shin, G. Y. Kim, W. Li et al., “Implication of intracellular ROS formation, caspase-3 activation and Egr-1 induction in platycodon D-induced apoptosis of U937 human leukemia cells,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 86–94, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Godbole, S. Ramalingam, V. P. Ramamurthy et al., “VN/14-1 induces ER stress and autophagy in HP-LTLC human breast cancer cells and has excellent oral pharmacokinetic profile in female Sprague Dawley rats,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 734, pp. 98–104, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Thompson, M. Maceyka, and Q. Chen, “Targeting ER stress and calpain activation to reverse age-dependent mitochondrial damage in the heart,” Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, vol. 192, article 111380, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Kumar and S. Maity, “ER stress-sensor proteins and ER-mitochondrial crosstalk-signaling beyond (ER) stress response,” Biomolecules, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 173, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Deegan, S. Saveljeva, S. E. Logue et al., “Deficiency in the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway reveals the toxic potential of autophagy under ER stress conditions,” Autophagy, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 1921–1936, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Chen, J. Zhu, Y. H. Wang, and C. H. Hang, “ROS-mediated mitochondrial dysfunction and ER stress contribute to compression-induced neuronal injury,” Neuroscience, vol. 416, pp. 268–280, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Barateiro, A. R. Vaz, S. L. Silva, A. Fernandes, and D. Brites, “ER stress, mitochondrial dysfunction and calpain/JNK activation are involved in oligodendrocyte precursor cell death by unconjugated bilirubin,” Neuromolecular Medicine, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 285–302, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. J. Klionsky, “Autophagy: from phenomenology to molecular understanding in less than a decade,” Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 931–937, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. J. Lin, C. C. Huang, Y. L. Su et al., “Proteomics analysis of tangeretin-induced apoptosis through mitochondrial dysfunction in bladder cancer cells,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 20, no. 5, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. T. Chang, Y. D. Bow, P. J. Fu et al., “A marine terpenoid, heteronemin, induces both the apoptosis and ferroptosis of hepatocellular carcinoma cells and involves the ROS and MAPK pathways,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2021, Article ID 7689045, 12 pages, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. V. Clement and S. Pervaiz, “Reactive oxygen intermediates regulate cellular response to apoptotic stimuli: an hypothesis,” Free Radical Research, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 247–252, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Desagher and J. C. Martinou, “Mitochondria as the central control point of apoptosis,” Trends in Cell Biology, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 369–377, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Nordberg and E. S. Arner, “Reactive oxygen species, antioxidants, and the mammalian thioredoxin system¹,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 1287–1312, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Xie, C. Lu, Y. Zhu, S. Zhu, E. J. Yang, and X. Jin, “Analysis on the association between sperm DNA fragmentation index and conventional semen parameters, blood microelements and seminal plasma ROS in male patients with infertility,” Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 5173–5176, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ogita, A. Ogita, Y. Usuki, K. I. Fujita, and T. Tanaka, “Antimycin A-induced cell death depends on AIF translocation through NO production and PARP activation and is not involved in ROS generation, cytochrome c release and caspase-3 activation in HL-60 cells,” Journal of Antibiotics (Tokyo), vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 145–152, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Bertolotti, Y. Zhang, L. M. Hendershot, H. P. Harding, and D. Ron, “Dynamic interaction of BiP and ER stress transducers in the unfolded-protein response,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 326–332, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Inokuchi, Y. Nakajima, M. Shimazawa et al., “Effect of an inducer of BiP, a molecular chaperone, on endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress-induced retinal cell death,” Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 334–344, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Selvakumaran, R. K. Amaravadi, I. A. Vasilevskaya, and P. J. O'Dwyer, “Autophagy inhibition sensitizes colon cancer cells to antiangiogenic and cytotoxic therapy,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 2995–3007, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T.-Y. Yang, Y. J. Wu, C. I. Chang, C. C. Chiu, and M. L. Wu, “The effect of bornyl cis-4-hydroxycinnamate on melanoma cell apoptosis is associated with mitochondrial dysfunction and endoplasmic reticulum stress,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 19, no. 5, p. 1370, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Y. Chang and G. C. Garrow, “Pilot study of vinorelbine (Navelbine) and paclitaxel (Taxol) in patients with refractory breast cancer and lung cancer,” Seminars in Oncology, vol. 22, 2 Supplement 5, pp. 66–70, 1995.
View at: Google Scholar
J. J. Lin, R. Wang, J. C. Chen, C. C. Chiu, M. H. Liao, and Y. J. Wu, “Cytotoxicity of 11-epi-sinulariolide acetate isolated from cultured soft corals on HA22T cells through the endoplasmic reticulum stress pathway and mitochondrial dysfunction,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 17, no. 11, p. 1787, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. L. Chan, M. Lai, and L. H. Wang, “Effect of dimerization on signal transduction and biological function of oncogenic Ros, insulin, and insulin-like growth factor I receptors,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 272, no. 1, pp. 146–153, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Schieber and N. S. Chandel, “ROS function in redox signaling and oxidative stress,” Current Biology, vol. 24, no. 10, pp. R453–R462, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Omata, J. B. Lewis, P. E. Lockwood et al., “Gold-induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) do not mediate suppression of monocytic mitochondrial or secretory function,” Toxicology In Vitro, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 625–633, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Shi, F. Nikulenkov, J. Zawacka-Pankau et al., “ROS-dependent activation of JNK converts p53 into an efficient inhibitor of oncogenes leading to robust apoptosis,” Cell Death and Differentiation, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 612–623, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Koretsi, C. Kirschneck, P. Proff, and P. Römer, “Expression of glutathione peroxidase 1 in the spheno-occipital synchondrosis and its role in ROS-induced apoptosis,” European Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 308–313, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. A. Slee and S. J. Martin, “Regulation of caspase activation in apoptosis: implications for transformation and drug resistance,” Cytotechnology, vol. 27, no. 1/3, pp. 309–320, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Shimizu and Y. Tsujimoto, “Proapoptotic BH3-only Bcl-2 family members induce cytochrome c release, but not mitochondrial membrane potential loss, and do not directly modulate voltage-dependent anion channel activity,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 577–582, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H.-H. Li, J. H. Su, C. C. Chiu et al., “Proteomic investigation of the sinulariolide-treated melanoma cells A375: effects on the cell apoptosis through mitochondrial-related pathway and activation of caspase cascade,” Marine Drugs, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 2625–2642, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Wajant, “The Fas signaling pathway: more than a paradigm,” Science, vol. 296, no. 5573, pp. 1635-1636, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Denicourt and S. F. Dowdy, “Targeting apoptotic pathways in cancer cells,” Science, vol. 305, no. 5689, pp. 1411–1413, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. R. Green and J. C. Reed, “Mitochondria and apoptosis,” Science, vol. 281, no. 5381, pp. 1309–1312, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. W. Nicholson and N. A. Thornberry, “Life and death decisions,” Science, vol. 299, no. 5604, pp. 214-215, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Yoshida, “ER stress response, peroxisome proliferation, mitochondrial unfolded protein response and Golgi stress response,” IUBMB Life, vol. 61, no. 9, pp. 871–879, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. I. Liu, R. Y. L. Wang, J. J. Lin et al., “Proteomic profiling of the 11-dehydrosinulariolide-treated oral carcinoma cells Ca9-22: effects on the cell apoptosis through mitochondrial-related and ER stress pathway,” Journal of Proteomics, vol. 75, no. 18, pp. 5578–5589, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Muller, J. Bandemer, C. Vindis et al., “Protein disulfide isomerase modification and inhibition contribute to ER stress and apoptosis induced by oxidized low density lipoproteins,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 731–742, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. S. Yu, C. S. Yu, J. C. Chen et al., “Tetrandrine induces apoptosis via caspase-8, -9, and -3 and poly (ADP ribose) polymerase dependent pathways and autophagy through beclin-1/ LC3-I, II signaling pathways in human oral cancer HSC-3 cells,” Environmental Toxicology, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 395–406, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Morita, S. Sakagashira, Y. Shimajiri et al., “Autophagy protects against human islet amyloid polypeptide-associated apoptosis,” Journal of Diabetes Investigation, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 48–55, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Yun-Ying She et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

324

Downloads

415

Citations