Learning and Development of Diagnostic Reasoning in Occupational Therapy Undergraduate Students
Table 5
Results regarding analysing information.
Problem formulation: analysing information
AY1 () (%)
AY3 () (%)
AY4 () (%)
Total
value
(%)
AI1: symptoms/signs
0.001
0
96 (38.9)
83 (33.6)
53 (21.5)
232 (93.9)
1
0 (0)
2 (0.8)
10 (4)
12 (4.9)
≥2
0 (0)
0 (0)
3 (1.2)
3 (1.2)
AI2: performance skills
0.168
0
80 (32.4)
64 (25.9)
47 (19)
191 (77.3)
1
14 (5.7)
20 (8.1)
15 (6.1)
49 (19.8)
≥2
2 (0.8)
1 (0.4)
4 (1.6)
7 (2.8)
AI3: performance patterns
0.001
0
95 (38.5)
67 (27.1)
40 (16.2)
202 (81.8)
1
1 (0.4)
16 (6.5)
16 (6.5)
33 (13.4)
≥2
0 (0)
2 (0.8)
6 (2.4)
8 (3.2)
AI4: environment
0.004
0
77 (31.2)
56 (22.7)
31 (12.6)
164 (66.4)
1
16 (6.5)
16 (6.5)
16 (6.5)
48 (19.4)
≥2
3 (1.2)
13 (5.3)
15 (6.1)
31 (12.6)
Results for the group of participants from the three universities (UV, UDC, and UCLM). AY: academic year. Percentages are based on the total sample (). Statistically significant variables () are highlighted in italics.
