Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
PPAR Research
Volume 2008, Article ID 527048, 14 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2008/527048
Review Article

PPAR Action in Human Placental Development and Pregnancy and Its Complications

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA

Received 2 September 2007; Accepted 13 November 2007

Academic Editor: P. Froment

Copyright © 2008 Fritz Wieser et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

During pregnancy crucial anatomic, physiologic, and metabolic changes challenge the mother and the fetus. The placenta is a remarkable organ that allows the mother and the fetus to adapt to the new metabolic, immunologic, and angiogenic environment imposed by gestation. One of the physiologic systems that appears to have evolved to sustain this metabolic regulation is mediated by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs). In clinical pregnancy-specific disorders, including preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, and intrauterine growth restriction, aberrant regulation of components of the PPAR system parallels dysregulation of metabolism, inflammation and angiogenesis. This review summarizes current knowledge on the role of PPARs in regulating human trophoblast invasion, early placental development, and also in the physiology of clinical pregnancy and its complications. As increasingly indicated in the literature, pregnancy disorders, such as preeclampsia and gestational diabetes, represent potential targets for treatment with PPAR ligands. With the advent of more specific PPAR agonists that exhibit efficacy in ameliorating metabolic, inflammatory, and angiogenic disturbances, further studies of their application in pregnancy-related diseases are warranted.

1. Introduction

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are major regulators of lipid and glucose metabolism, inflammation, and angiogenesis [16] that allow adaptation of the mother to the nutritional and perfusion requirements of the fetus [3, 7, 8]. PPARs, members of the nuclear hormone receptor superfamily, are ligand-activated transcription factors. The PPAR amino acid sequence can be divided into five modular domains: A/B, C, D, E, and F. Domain E is the ligand binding domain (LBD) and contains a ligand-dependent transcriptional activation function (AF-2). Domain C is the DNA binding domain, formed of two typical zinc fingers. PPARs activate DNA direct repeat response elements by binding as heterodimers with retinoic acid receptor (RXR) partners [9]. There are three PPAR isotypes, PPARα, PPARγ, and PPARβ/δ, that are highly conserved across species, with mouse, rat, and human sequences sharing >80% amino acid homology [6, 10]. The conserved expression of different PPAR and RXR isotypes in both rat and human placentas [11] suggests that these receptors play functional roles in placental lipid transfer and homeostasis. PPARα has a wide distribution and is prominent in tissues with high metabolic rates such as liver, heart, skeletal muscle, and kidney and in steroidogenic organs such as the adrenals [12]. PPARγ has three isoforms (PPARγ1, γ2, and γ3) and is expressed in brown and white adipose tissue, large intestine, to a lesser extent in immune cells (monocytes, macrophages, Peyer’s patches of the digestive tract), the mucosa of colon and cecum, and placental trophoblasts [1316]. PPARβ/δ is distributed in all tissues tested with particularly high expression in placenta and large intestine [8, 17, 18]. PPARα and PPARγ are involved in adipocyte differentiation, lipid metabolism, insulin action, and in the regulation of inflammatory responses [1, 5, 16], particularly involving the macrophage [19]. PPARβ/δ is known to be involved in lipid metabolism and inflammation, as well as keratinocyte differentiation and wound healing [5, 20, 21].

The PPAR system is intimately involved in cardiovascular disease, obesity, as well as pregnancy-specific diseases [6, 22]. Over the past decade studies have shown that all three PPAR isotypes are expressed in human placental trophoblast cells [11] and that they are involved in the regulation of pregnancy physiology and its clinical complications. Physiological and pathophysiological conditions that modulate the PPAR system [2235] influence the risk and course of preeclampsia (PE), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), or intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) [3653]. Some of these diseases and factors involving the PPAR system are summarized in Tables 1 and 2.

tab1
Table 1: Effects of physiological and pathophysiological conditions on PPAR.
tab2
Table 2: Effects of metabolic conditions on pregnancy-specific diseases (GDM: gestational diabetes mellitus; PE: preeclampsia; IUGR: Intrauterine growth restriction; −: reduced risk; +: increased risk).

In early pregnancy, immediately after embryonic implantation, major maternal physiologic changes occur in the cardiovascular, hepatic, and endocrine systems with resultant anatomical and metabolic modifications that serve to promote maternal immune tolerance of the conceptus and to provide the fetus with its increased nutritional needs [54, 55]. Metabolic changes (including increased availability of glucose, low density lipoprotein, and fatty acids) increased insulin resistance and altered amino acid metabolism, immunologic, and hematologic changes (including an increase in plasma volume). Establishment of a thrombophilic state and extensive placental and decidual angiogenesis are observed in pregnancy, and these changes require a complex activation of regulating mediators [5658].

Pregnancy complications result when the mother and/or fetus fail to adapt to these new metabolic, angiogenic, and thrombogenic challenges. Women with preexisting compromise to their vascular homeostasis, such as underlying hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or metabolic syndrome, have a significantly increased risk of developing pregnancy complications (see Table 2). Placenta-associated complications also can lead to impaired growth or fetal demise [59, 60]. These placental conditions share vasculopathological mechanisms in common with atherosclerosis and represent early markers for maternal risk of cardiovascular disease [61, 62] and hypertension [61, 63, 64]. Curiously, a prior history of preeclampsia appears to confer protection against the future development of endometriosis and some cancers [65, 66].

PPARs can be activated by natural ligands, like prostaglandins (PGs), fatty acids, and their derivatives, as well as by synthetic ligands. PPAR medications have been developedand discovered to be relatively safe drugs with benefits in multiple disease states including diabetes and cardiovascular disease [67]. Fibrate drugs used to treat hyperlipidemia, and thiazolidinedione drugs used to treat type 2 diabetes are potent and relatively specific ligand activators of PPARα and γ, respectively, and are widely used clinically [68, 69]. A number of naturally-occurring PPAR ligands have been identified, including long-chain fatty acids (C16 and greater), eicosanoids such as 8(S)-HETE (PPARα) and 9-and13-HODE (PPARγ), and PGs such as PGA1,which binds to PPARα, PPARβ/δ, and 15-deoxy-delta12,14-prostaglandin J2(15dPGJ2), which in turn binds to PPARγ [7072]. Both the expression of PPAR and the production of their potential ligands are altered during pregnancy and its related diseases. We postulate that pathologic diversion of fatty-acid metabolism away from the production of eicosanoid ligands in preeclampsia and gestational diabetes might be corrected using synthetic ligands.

2. PPARs in Trophoblast Invasion and Placental Development

In first trimester, human placental bed biopsies, PPAR-γ is expressed predominantly in invasive trophoblasts, whereas in the second-trimester PPARγ is expressed in the columns of anchoring villi and cytotrophoblasts [73, 74]. In the third trimester, PPARγ principally localizes to extravillous cytotrophoblasts (EVCT) and villous syncytiotrophoblasts [75], where it appears to regulate placental hormone production and secretion. Although the focus of this review is to summarize findings on PPAR/RXR heterodimers in human placentation, much of the direct evidence for a role of these receptors in trophoblast invasion and placental development has emerged from studies in knockout mouse models. This topic is reviewed comprehensively in Schaiff et al. [3], and is summarized briefly here and in Table 3 [7681].

tab3
Table 3: PPAR knock out models and placental pathology (PRIP: peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-(PPAR) interacting protein; RAP 250: nuclear receptor-activating protein 250).

PPARγ/RXRα heterodimers play a key regulatory role in murine placental development. PPARγ deficiency was shown to interfere with terminal trophoblast differentiation and placental vascularization [78]; embryos without this gene show massive placental defects that can be rescued by restoration of the trophoblast PPARγ gene via tetraploid chimeras [15]. Deletion of RXRα and RXRβ also leads to embryo lethality [15, 81, 83]. Both PPAR-interacting protein (PRIP) and nuclear receptor-activating protein 250 (RAP250) encode nuclear receptor coactivators that associate with PPARs, RXRs, and other nuclear receptor proteins. Genetic disruption of PRIP or RAP250 in mouse models results in embryonic lethality at postconception days 11.5 and 13.5, respectively [79, 80]. Placentas of PRIP (−/−) and RAP250 (−/−) embryos exhibited dramatically reduced spongiotrophoblast and labyrinth layers as well as failure of blood vessel maturation in the region bordering the spongiotrophoblast [79, 80].

In addition to placentation per se, PPARγ appears to play an important role in the uterine preparation for embryonic implantation. Peeters et al. demonstrated that PPARγ ligands reduced the production of the endometrial angiogenic factor VEGF, and postulated that this pathway might influence early embryonic vascularization [84]. By contrast, PPARγ agonists induce angiogenesis in cardiac myofibroblasts, smooth muscle cells, and macrophages [8587]. Recent preliminary data by our lab and others suggest that the PPARγ system also stimulates VEGF expression in trophoblast (JEG-3) cells (Depoix et al., unpublished).

The functional role of PPARγ activity is well studied in trophoblast physiology (Table 4). PPARγ agonists inhibit invasion of cultured EVCT isolated from human first-trimester placenta, whereas PPARγ antagonists promoted EVCT invasion and repressed the PPARγ agonist-mediated effects [78]. PPARγ controls mucin (MUC)-1 transcription and regulates maternal-fetal transport in mouse models [88]. Moreover, PPARγ and RXRα play a role in human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) expression, trophoblast differentiation, and regulation of fatty acid transport and storage in human placental trophoblasts [89, 90]. PPARγ diminishes leptin-induced inflammatory responses in the human placenta [91] and inhibits PAPP-A expression [92].

tab4
Table 4: PPAR action in trophoblast development and placental function (MUC-1: mucin-1; EVCT: extravillous cytotrophoblast; hCG: human chorionic gonadotropin; Th2 T-helper 2 cell).

Regulation of PPARγ in human placental tissues is thought to occur through natural ligands (e.g., 15dPGJ2, 9-HODE, 13-HODE, and 15-HETE) through direct binding to the receptor’s ligand binding pocket [11, 100]. These ligands are likely to be synthesized locally within the placenta. Furthermore, crosstalk between the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) p38 and PPARγ occurs within cultured trophoblast cells [101]. PPARγ decreases IGFII secretion and is thought to inhibit trophoblast invasion via the PAPP-A cascade [92].

In young PPARα knock out mice, no major phenotypic differences of gross pathology of internal organs were described [76, 102]. However, disturbance of the Th1/Th2 T-lymphocyte ratio, rather than placental malformation, is thought to be responsible for an increased abortion rate (20%) in PPARα null mice. During normal pregnancy Th1 cytokines are downregulated and Th2 cytokines are upregulated [103].

The third distinct PPAR, PPARβ/δ also is essential for placentation as demonstrated in PPARβ/δ knockout mice (Table 3) [77], and is involved in the regulation of implantation in other animal models [17, 104, 105]. The implantation of cultured embryos is enhanced by PPARβ/δ activation and this receptor even has been postulated as a novel therapeutic target to improve clinical IVF outcomes [104]. PPARβ/δ is induced during decidualization of the implantation site and requires close contact with the blastocyst. PPARβ/δ null mice die between 9.5 to 10.5 embryonic days due to abnormal cell-cell communication at the placental-decidual interface [8].

Together these data suggest that PPARs are required not only for trophoblast invasion and differentiation but also for establishment of the placental maternal-fetal transport.

3. PPARs and Pregnancy

Based on its regulatory functions and known eicosanoid ligands, PPARγ has emerged as an excellent candidate to play a role in the regulation of maternal metabolism, maintenance of uterine quiescence, and onset of labor by regulating proinflammatory cytokines and prostaglandins (Table 4). Normal pregnancy is accompanied by changes in lipid and glucose metabolism, but further dysregulation of these pathways can lead to pregnancy complications such as PE or GDM. Hence, PPAR regulators of these metabolic pathways might be expected to be important in human pregnancy.

Some of our initial studies in this field were designed to screen for potential activators of PPARγ in the circulation of pregnant women. Human choriocarcinoma JEG-3 cells were transfected with peroxisome-proliferator responsive reporter plasmids; and pooled sera from pregnant and nonpregnant women were added to the cell culture medium [73]. Peroxisome proliferator responsive element (PPRE) luciferase reporter activation was dramatically increased by sera from pregnant women compared to nonpregnant women (Figures 1 and 2). We showed that PPARγ (and to some extent PPARα) activity is increased from the earliest stages of pregnancy (Figure 2). The findings suggested that circulating PPARγ-activating factors, presumably eicosanoids, were present throughout the course of gestation. We hypothesized that activation of PPARγ by sera of pregnant women is a regulatory adaptation of the maternal organism to increased lipid and glucose loading in pregnancy [73].

127048.fig.001
Figure 1: JEG-3 cells were transfected with PPRE-luciferase reporter vectors and treated with pooled sera (10%) from non-pregnant (NP), pregnant (P) and preeclamptic (PE) women. Luciferase acitivity, relative to cells treated with 10% dextran charcoal-shipped fetal calf serum (DCSS), is reported on the ordinate.
127048.fig.002
Figure 2: PPARγ activation is present throughout the course of normal pregnancy. All serum samples were collected from the same subject and PPRE-luciferase reporter experiments were performed using 10% serum as described in Figure 1. Luciferase activity was normalized to DCSS to determine relative activation. Black horizontal bar represents the level of signaling seen with 10% serum from the same woman six weeks after delivery.

It also has been hypothesized that PPARγ activation regulates uterine quiescence by influencing Nuclear Factor-Kappa B (NFκB) and cyclooxygenase (COX-2) expression [96, 97, 106]. Reciprocal expression of PPARγ and (COX)-2 in human term placenta suggests a role of the PPAR system in the initiation of labor [98]. Under conditions of high PPARγ expression, antiinflammatory actions dominate; however, with onset of labor PPARγ levels drop and COX-2 concomitantly increases in the fetal membranes [98]. Elevated COX-2 activity in the human amnion is observed in the settings of term and idiopathic preterm labor, contributing to the generation of uterotonic prostaglandins (PGs), which are known to participate in parturition [107]. PPARγ ligands have been shown to antagonize NF-κB activation and reduce inflammatory cytokine gene expression (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10 and TNF-α) and COX-2 [108]. Both natural (e.g., 15dPGJ2) and synthetic ligands (e.g., troglitazone) were shown to have anti-inflammatory effects in human gestational tissues, significantly decreasing basal and LPS-stimulated PGE2 and PGF2α release from placenta and amnion [108]. PGF2α , also a marker of oxidative stress, is increased in women with preeclampsia [109]. Given the inflammatory changes observed in pregnancy-specific diseases, a potential role of PPAR agonist treatment has been entertained for the treatment of PE, GDM, and other pregnancy-specific diseases such as the prevention of preterm labor [96].

PPARα and β/δ also play a role in maintaining pregnancy and parturition. PPARα and β/δ are expressed in the amnion, choriodecidua, and villous placental tissues. Data from PPARα knockout mice suggest that PPARα maintains pregnancy by stimulating a Th2 cytokine response [76]. In normal pregnancy, expression of PPARα declines in the choriodecidua with the onset of labor [99]. By contrast, PPARβ/δ expression, which is temporally upregulated between the first and third trimester of pregnancy [99], increases further in the amnion coincidental with the onset of labor [99].

Few studies have elucidated substantial risk of PPAR agonists during pregnancy in animal models, but these drugs carry a “C” classification from the FDA. For example, rosiglitazone did not damage blastocyst development in vitro or harm mouse fetuses when given during murine pregnancy [110]. While the use of rosiglitazone during pregnancy is generally considered to be safe [110]; more data need to be acquired before these drugs can be recommended.

4. PPARs and Pregnancy-Specific Diseases

Failure of metabolic adaptation to pregnancy can result in pregnancy-specific complications such as PE and GDM. We and others have postulated that angiogenic factors and cytokines that lead to pathological gestational changes are likely to be regulated by the PPAR system (Table 5).

tab5
Table 5: PPAR in pregnancy-specific diseases.
4.1. PPARs and Preeclampsia

PE is a multifactorial, pregnancy-related disorder that is defined by new-onset hypertension and proteinuria after 20 weeks of gestation [117]. PE is a common cause of maternal and infant morbidity and mortality worldwide, and is responsible for about 20% of pregnancy-related maternal deaths in the US [118]. Women with PE have increased insulin resistance as well as hypertriglyceridemia relative to normal pregnant women [119]. To date, no effective treatment has been found that either prevents or reverses the development of the disease. Modern concepts of PE pathophysiology invoke a two-stage process. The first stage is believed to be initiated by impaired trophoblast invasion and abnormal uterine vessel remodeling. The second stage is postulated to result from circulating factors claimed to be derived from the ischemic placenta that stimulate an inflammatory activation of maternal vascular endothelial cells. PE presents clinically in the second or third trimester, however, fundamental inflammatory and angiogenic biomarkers in the serum are detectable as early as the first trimester in women with PE. Elevated concentrations of IL-2, TNFα, and sVEGFR-1 and reduced concentrations of PlGF, IGFBP-1, and HLA-G in the maternal serum precede the clinical manifestations of PE [119123].

While the cause of PE remains unknown, several environmental and genetic risk factors have been identified (Table 2). Relevant to this review are hypertension, diabetes, and high (>29) body mass index (BMI) [47, 124, 125]. Black race also appears to be a risk factor for PE [126] although this may be confounded by increased rates of the above risk factors. Key inflammatory and angiogenic pathways involved in the pathogenesis of PE are regulated by the PPAR system, which itself is influenced by environmental and genetic factors. We believe that exogenous and endogenous lipid regulators of PPAR play a role in maternal metabolism and immune functionin normal and pathological pregnancies. For example, dietary factors and physical activity that modulate the PPAR system have been shown to reduce the risk and course of PE (Table 2).

Similarly, genetic variations in the PPARγ gene have been proposed to modify the risk of PE. For example, the Pro467Leu mutation of PPARγ [127129] is a dominant negative mutant resulting from a C-to-T transition in exon 6. A report of two individuals (one woman, one man) with this mutation showed that they developed type 2 diabetes at young ages (26 and 27 years at diagnosis), as well as early hypertension (37 and 27 years at diagnosis). Intriguingly, the woman had two pregnancies, both of which were complicated by severe PE. The Pro12Ala polymorphism occurs in PPARγ2 [130], a second isoform of PPARγ that is expressed mainly in adipose tissue. This mutation is the result of a C-to-G transversion in exon B. This is by far the most studied allelic variation in any PPAR, and occurs at a rate of about 12% in the Caucasian US population. While the resulting phenotype is highly diverse and even apparently contradictory, it appears that the penetrance of this mutation is influenced by other genetic, environmental, ethnic, and gender differences. The studies generally agree that the presence of the Ala allele is associated with increased BMI, an independent risk factor for PE. Thus, this polymorphism is a candidate affecting pregnancy outcome. Preliminary data of a study on the PPAR gene variations (in PPAR gene) showed no association with PE or severity of PE in a Finnish population [131]. Further studies on the association of PPAR α, β, and γ gene variations of mothers and offspring and pregnancy-specific diseases need to be performed in different ethnic populations.

PE is marked by hyperlipidemia, and is characterized by a state of oxidative stress. Circulating lipids in PE women are more highly oxidized, and oxidized low-density lipoproteins (oxLDLs), in particular, are highly elevated [132]. Given the circulating plasma lipid disturbances in PE, our group performed experiments comparing sera from normal and PE patients. We found that serum from women with severe PE had reduced levels of PPAR activating lipids compared with serum of parity and gestational age-matched women and also diminished the expression of PPARγ in trophoblast cells (Figures 1 and 3) [111]. The reduction of transcriptional activity observed in preeclamptic women’s sera was shown for PPARγ and PPARα, however not for PPARβ/δ or RXR. The reduction in potential circulating PPAR activatorswas observed weeks and sometimes months before the onset of maternal symptoms and clinicaldiagnosis of PE [133]. Our results are consistent with other clinical evidence that antiinflammatory regulation is challenged and further compromised in the maternal syndrome of PE. Normal pregnancy manifests as a physiologic inflammatory state postulated to be tolerated to serve the nutritional needs of the fetus, whereas, in PE regulatory inflammatory mechanisms are excessively amplified, leading to vascular damage in the mother [133]. In this “hyperinflammatory” state of PE [134], the cytokines TNFα and IL-1β which are typically controlled by the NF-κB pathway in a negative-feedback loop with PPAR, are elevated [26, 60, 119]. Elevated inflammatory parameters in PE accompany altered levels of PG metabolites and circulating fatty acids. As noted, PG metabolites as well as fatty acids are important ligands of the PPAR system [135]. PG metabolism is altered during normal pregnancy with levels of vasorelaxants suchas prostacyclin increasing, whereas vasoconstrictive prostaglandin levelstend to be suppressed [136]. Failure of these alterations have been suggested to lead to pregnancy complications (e.g., PE) [137]. For example, PGF2α, which itself is stimulated by factorsin the plasma of women with PE [138], can inhibit PPARγ effects [135]. Levelsof circulating free fatty acids are in the normal range duringmost of pregnancy, but rise dramatically during the final weeks of pregnancy and drop precipitously at term [136]. In PE these levels are increased from 20 weeks’ gestation [133, 139]. We postulate that altered PG metabolism in this setting [138] results in decreased PPARγ ligation and subsequent cytokine activation. If this proposal is supported by more data, the use of PPAR ligands might be proposed to ameliorate symptoms such as hypertension and inflammation. Unfortunately, at present, the mechanism and site of this salutary of PPAR ligand effect remain unknown in pregnancy, confounded by PPAR expression in many cell types, including endothelial cells.

127048.fig.003
Figure 3: Immunoblot of JEG-3 cells treated with pooled sera (10%) from nonpregnant (NP), pregnant (P), and preeclamptic (PE) women. Cell lysates were analyzed using a specific mouse anti-human PPARγ monoclonal antibody. Equal amounts of protein (50 μg) were loaded into each lane. Factors in pregnant serum up-regulate JEG-3 PPARγ expression. A decrease in PPARγ protein was observed in cells exposed to PE sera (PE) compared to sera from normal pregnant women (P).
4.2. PPARs and Gestational Diabetes

During normal pregnancy, maternal lipid, and glucose metabolism is profoundly altered [140]. The developing fetus uses glucose as its predominant energy source, which puts a continuous demand on the mother to provide this substrate [141]. This constant need for glucose results in frequent hypoglycemia and postprandial hyperglycemia during normal pregnancy [141]. Problems with energy metabolism such as GDM are not uncommon and are often observed in susceptible women at this time. GDM is defined as any degreeof glucose intolerance with onset or first recognition during pregnancy. In women with GDM, defective β-cells function cannot adequately compensate for free fatty acid-mediated insulin resistance [142]. As elsewhere in our society, the incidence of obesity, diabetes, and gestational diabetes mellitus are increasing in the pregnant population [143]. In the United States, the incidence of obesity among pregnant women ranges from 18.5% to 38.3% [144]; obesity comprises a major risk factor for GDM [145]. Morphological changes have been identified in the syncytiotrophoblast, cytotrophoblast, trophoblastic basement membrane, and fetal vessels within the placentae of these cases [146]. GDM is associated with several severe neonatal complications (such as macrosomia, brachial plexus palsy, premature delivery, IUGR, and intrauterine death) and maternal birth injuries also are common [125, 147]. Furthermore, GDM has emerged as a risk factor for the development of diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2) and cardiovascular disease in later life and shares a number of epidemiologic, pathophysiologic, and genetic characteristics with DM2 [148]. GDM also has detrimental effects on the postnatal infants [149].

The PPAR system regulates the metabolic and pathways involved in the establishment of GDM. PPAR-agonists have antidiabetogenic, antiinflammatory, and antioxidant effects, which are all potentially beneficial in the treatment of GDM [5].

Environmental factors, such as diet and exercise and genetic factors influence PPARα, γ activity [130, 150] as well as the risk for insulin resistance and GDM (Table 2). Exercise activity initiated prepregnancy was shown to reduce the risk of GDM and its complications [40, 41, 44, 151, 152]. Nutritional counseling, moderate physical exercise, weight loss, and diet are successful therapies in some women with GDM, improving glycemic control, reducing the incidence of LGA infants, and decreasing the need for cesarean deliveries for cephalopelvic disproportion [41, 153].

Candidate genes for GDM risk include TNFα, β3 adrenoreceptor (ADRB3), and PPARα and γ. The PPARγ Pro12Ala polymorphism was not associated with increased insulin resistance in Turkish women with GDM, however it was associated with weight gain [112]. The PPARγ coactivator-1alpha (PGC-1) polymorphism also failed to be associated with the development of GDM [154]. More studies on the association of various genetic PPARα and γ variants and GDM in different ethnic populations will be of interest.

15dPGJ2 is a potent antiinflammatory agent that represses the expression of a number of inflammatory genes and regulating factors including the transcription factor NF-κB [33, 108]. The concentration of 15dPGJ2 was reduced in placentae from diabetic rats (Table 5) [95]. Placental 15dPGJ2 was noted to be diminished in women with gestational and pregestational diabetes when compared to controls, whereas levels of nitric oxide (a stimulator of placental invasiveness, differentiation, and proliferation) were higher in term placental explants from diabetic patients when compared to controls [113]. As PPARγ can prevent nitric oxide overproduction in placenta from pregestational diabetic women [113], it may have the potential to improve fetal outcome in this condition.

Sulfonylurea agents including gliumepiride and glibenclamide exhibit PPARγ activity [155]. A randomized controlled trial to test the effectiveness and safety of the sulfonylurea agent glyburide in the management of women with GDM showed similar efficacy to insulin treatment [156]. Both the insulin- and glyburide-treated women were able to achieve satisfactory glucose control and had similar perinatal outcome [156].

4.3. PPARs and Other Pregnancy-Specific Diseases

Trophoblast research has emphasized the similarities between the proliferative, migratory, andinvasive properties of placental cells and those of cancer cells [157]. PPARγ, PPARβ/δ, and RXR appear to be linked to gestational trophoblastic neoplasms, conditions associated with malignant trophoblast behavior [114]. PPARγ agonists inhibit invasion of normal extravillous cytotrophoblast isolated from human first-trimester placenta, and PPAR activity has been shown to be downregulated in trophoblastic diseases including hydatidiform mole and choriocarcinoma [114].

PPARγ has an effect on fetal and placental size influencing intrauterine growth. In an intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) model, glucocorticoids inhibited fetal and placental growth partly by suppression of PPARγ in the labyrinth zone of the placenta [158]. Activation of PPARγ in the labyrinth trophoblasts is hypothesized to induce angiogenic factors and stimulate the growth of fetal blood vessels, thereby promoting placental growth. However, treatment of pregnant mice with rosiglitazone led to reduced thickness of the spongiotrophoblast layer and the surface area of labyrinthine vasculature, and it altered expression of proteins implicated in placental development [159].

In vitro and in vivo experiments as well as animal models studies suggest a link between the PPAR system and gestational duration, preterm labor, and birth weight [116]. Variations in the PPAR genes influence other pregnancy-related mechanisms including birth weight and gestational duration. In an Irish population, the PPARγ Ala12 allele was associated with shorter gestational duration [116].

PPAR ligands regulate apoptotic mechanisms involved in rupture of the fetal membranes and may play a role in preterm delivery, a condition associated with increased risk of neonatal sepsis and newborn trauma [160]. 15d-PGJ2induced morphological characteristics of apoptosis within 2 hours in an amniotic cell line [160]. In addition, ciglitizone also induced apoptosis, whereas rosiglitazone had no effect on cell viability [160]. Prevention of apoptosis may have therapeutic potential in preterm labor and premature rupture of the membranes and necessitates further investigations.

Interestingly, PPARα deficiency is associated with miscarriage, neonatal mortality, and a shift from Th2 to a Th1 cytokine phenotype [76]. Th1 predominant immunity is closely associated with inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and pregnancy complications. For example, interferonγ is significantly reduced in the spleens of PPARα null mice [76]. Twenty percent of PPARα knockout mice aborted, and offspring of PPAR-α null mice exhibited increased neonatal mortality (13.3%). However the mechanism whereby PPARα induces a Th2 phenotype shift remains to be determined. PPARγ ligands also were shown to decrease production of inflammatory ligands in activated macrophages and T cells and to induce a shift from Th1 to Th2 cytokine phenotype [161, 162].

5. Conclusions

PPARs are involved in trophoblast invasion, placental development, parturition, and pregnancy-specific diseases, particularly PE and GDM. The role of the PPAR system in pregnancy under physiologic and pathologic conditions has remained partly unclear due to lack of knowledge about endogenous PPAR ligands. Pharmacological ligand research is ahead of the identification of physiologic ligands. Partially characterized inflammatory, angiogenic, and metabolic disturbances in pregnancy-related diseases suggest that these synthetic PPAR agonists may be of potential use in these conditions. Ongoing basic studies have elucidated the metabolic, antiinflammatory, and angiogenic benefits of PPARα/β/δ and PPARγ/β/δ dual agonists and PPAR pan agonists for treatment purposes. However, some experimental and clinical data have uncovered unfortunate side effects of PPAR ligands, including cancer progression and increased cardiac event rates. New generations of PPAR modulators are under development and these promise to be more receptor-specific, and hopefully will activate only a specific subset of target genes and metabolic pathways to reduce untoward side effects. The potential role of PPARs in regulation of inflammation and angiogenesis is intriguing and warrants further studies. We submit that PPAR agonists may become beneficial drugs for pregnancy-specific diseases, once their risks have been fully evaluated.

Acknowledgment

The authors’ studies described in this article were supported by NIH Grants P01-HD30367 and R01-HL73469.

References

  1. G. Rizzo and S. Fiorucci, “PPARs and other nuclear receptors in inflammation,” Current Opinion in Pharmacology, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 421–427, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. A. Margeli, G. Kouraklis, and S. Theocharis, “Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-γ (PPAR-γ) ligands and angiogenesis,” Angiogenesis, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 165–169, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. W. T. Schaiff, Y. Barak, and Y. Sadovsky, “The pleiotropic function of PPARγ in the placenta,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, vol. 249, no. 1-2, pp. 10–15, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. P. Froment, F. Gizard, D. Defever, B. Staels, J. Dupont, and P. Monget, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors in reproductive tissues: from gametogenesis to parturition,” Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 189, no. 2, pp. 199–209, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. J. Berger and D. E. Moller, “The mechanisms of action of PPARs,” Annual Review of Medicine, vol. 53, pp. 409–435, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. S. Kersten, B. Desvergne, and W. Wahli, “Roles of PPARs in health and disease,” Nature, vol. 405, no. 6785, pp. 421–424, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. M. J. Holness, G. K. Greenwood, N. D. Smith, and M. C. Sugden, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α and glucocorticoids interactively regulate insulin secretion during pregnancy,” Diabetes, vol. 55, no. 12, pp. 3501–3508, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. K. Nadra, S. I. Anghel, E. Joye et al., “Differentiation of trophoblast giant cells and their metabolic functions are dependent on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor ß/d,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 3266–3281, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. G. Krey, A. Mahfoudi, and W. Wahli, “Functional interactions of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor, retinoid-X receptor, and Sp1 in the transcriptional regulation of the acyl- coenzyme-A oxidase promoter,” Molecular Endocrinology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 219–231, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. Y. Guan, Y. Zhang, L. Davis, and M. D. Breyer, “Expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors in urinary tract of rabbits and humans,” American Journal of Physiology - Renal Physiology, vol. 273, no. 6, pp. F1013–F1022, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  11. T. Fournier, V. Tsatsaris, K. Handschuh, and D. Evain-Brion, “PPARs and the placenta,” Placenta, vol. 28, no. 2-3, pp. 65–76, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. O. Braissant, F. Foufelle, C. Scotto, M. Dauça, and W. Wahli, “Differential expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs): tissue distribution of PPAR-α, -β, and -γ in the adult rat,” Endocrinology, vol. 137, no. 1, pp. 354–366, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. L. Fajas, J.-C. Fruchart, and J. Auwerx, “PPARγ3 mRNA: a distinct PPARγ mRNA subtype transcribed from an independent promoter,” FEBS Letters, vol. 438, no. 1-2, pp. 55–60, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. P. Peraldi, M. Xu, and B. M. Spiegelman, “Thiazolidinediones block tumor necrosis factor-α-induced inhibition of insulin signaling,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 100, no. 7, pp. 1863–1869, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. Y. Barak, M. C. Nelson, E. S. Ong et al., “PPAR? is required for placental, cardiac, and adipose tissue development,” Molecular Cell, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 585–595, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. X. Zhang and H. A. Young, “PPAR and immune system—what do we know?” International Immunopharmacology, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 1029–1044, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. E. Lord, B. D. Murphy, J. A. Desmarais, S. Ledoux, D. Beaudry, and M.-F. Palin, “Modulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor δ and γ transcripts in swine endometrial tissue during early gestation,” Reproduction, vol. 131, no. 5, pp. 929–942, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. H. Higashiyama, A. N. Billin, Y. Okamoto, M. Kinoshita, and S. Asano, “Expression profiling of Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-δ (PPAR-δ) in mouse tissues using tissue microarray,” Histochemistry and Cell Biology, vol. 127, no. 5, pp. 485–494, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. A. Chawla, Y. Barak, L. Nagy, D. Liao, P. Tontonoz, and R. M. Evans, “PPAR-γ dependent and independent effects on macrophage-gene expression in lipid metabolism and inflammation,” Nature Medicine, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 48–52, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. D. K. Krämer, L. Al-Khalili, B. Guigas, Y. Leng, P. M. Garcia-Roves, and A. Krook, “Role of AMP kinase and PPARδ in the regulation of lipid and glucose metabolism in human skeletal muscle,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 282, no. 27, pp. 19313–19320, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. M. Adjuik., A. Babiker, P. Garner, P. Olliaro, W. Taylor, and N. White, “Artesunate combinations for treatment of malaria: meta-analysis,” The Lancet, vol. 363, no. 9402, pp. 9–17, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. K. S. Park, T. P. Ciaraldi, L. Abrams-Carter, S. Mudaliar, S. E. Nikoulina, and R. R. Henry, “PPAR-γ gene expression is elevated in skeletal muscle of obese and type II diabetic subjects,” Diabetes, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 1230–1234, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. P. Imbeault, H. Vidal, A. Tremblay et al., “Age-related differences in messenger ribonucleic acid expression of key proteins involved in adipose cell differentiation and metabolism,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 828–833, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. M. Iemitsu, T. Miyauchi, S. Maeda et al., “Aging-induced decrease in the PPAR-a level in hearts is improved by exercise training,” American Journal of Physiology - Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 283, no. 5, pp. H1750–H1760, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  25. Q. N. Diep and E. L. Schiffrin, “Increased expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α and -γ in blood vessels of spontaneously hypertensive rats,” Hypertension, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 249–254, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  26. O. Mezei, W. J. Banz, R. W. Steger, M. R. Peluso, T. A. Winters, and N. Shay, “Soy isoflavones exert antidiabetic and hypolipidemic effects through the PPAR pathways in obese zucker rats and murine RAW 264.7 cells,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 133, no. 5, pp. 1238–1243, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  27. A. Vidal-Puig, M. Jimenez-Liñan, B. B. Lowell et al., “Regulation of PPAR ? gene expression by nutrition and obesity in rodents,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 97, no. 11, pp. 2553–2561, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  28. B. Delage, C. Bairras, B. Buaud, V. Pallet, and P. Cassand, “A high-fat diet generates alterations in nuclear receptor expression: prevention by vitamin A and links with cyclooxygenase-2 and β-catenin,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 116, no. 6, pp. 839–846, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. J. P. Bastard, B. Hainque, E. Dusserre et al., “Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-?, leptin and tumor necrosis factor-a mRNA expression during very low calorie diet in subcutaneous adipose tissue in obese women,” Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 92–98, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. A. Petridou, S. Tsalouhidou, G. Tsalis, T. Schulz, H. Michna, and V. Mougios, “Long-term exercise increases the DNA binding activity of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ in rat adipose tissue,” Metabolism, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 1029–1036, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. T. Fritz, D. K. Krämer, H. K. Karlsson et al., “Low-intensity exercise increases skeletal muscle protein expression of PPARd and UCP3 in type 2 diabetic patients,” Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 492–498, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. A. J. Vidal-Puig, R. V. Considine, M. Jimenez-Liñan et al., “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gene expression in human tissues. Effects of obesity, weight loss, and regulation by insulin and glucocorticoids,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 99, no. 10, pp. 2416–2422, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. D. B. Savage, G. D. Tan, C. L. Acerini et al., “Human metabolic syndrome resulting from dominant-negative mutations in the nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-?,” Diabetes, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 910–917, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. S. Y. Ding, Z. F. Shen, Y. T. Chen, S. J. Sun, Q. Liu, and M. Z. Xie, “Pioglitazone can ameliorate insulin resistance in low-dose streptozotocin and high sucrose-fat diet induced obese rats,” Acta Pharmacologica Sinica, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 575–580, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. R. Jaziri, S. Lobbens, R. Aubert et al., “The PPARG Pro12Ala polymorphism is associated with a decreased risk of developing hyperglycemia over 6 years and combines with the effect of the APM1 G-11391A single nucleotide polymorphism,” Diabetes, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 1157–1162, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. I. Ostlund, B. Haglund, and U. Hanson, “Gestational diabetes and preeclampsia,” European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 12–16, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. I. Delbaere, H. Verstraelen, S. Goetgeluk, G. Martens, G. De Backer, and M. Temmerman, “Pregnancy outcome in primiparae of advanced maternal age,” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology & Reproductive Biology, vol. 135, no. 1, pp. 41–46, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. A. O. Odibo, D. Nelson, D. M. Stamilio, H. M. Sehdev, and G. A. Macones, “Advanced maternal age is an independent risk factor for intrauterine growth restriction,” American Journal of Perinatology, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 325–328, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. B. M. Sibai, M. Ewell, R. J. Levine et al., “Risk factors associated with preeclampsia in healthy nulliparous women. The calcium for preeclampsia prevention (CPEP) study group,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 177, no. 5, pp. 1003–1010, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. R. Artal, R. B. Catanzaro, J. A. Gavard, D. J. Mostello, and J. C. Friganza, “A lifestyle intervention of weight-gain restriction: diet and exercise in obese women with gestational diabetes mellitus,” Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 596–601, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. A. F. Saftlas, N. Logsden-Sackett, W. Wang, R. Woolson, and M. B. Bracken, “Work, leisure-time physical activity, and risk of preeclampsia and gestational hypertension,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 160, no. 8, pp. 758–765, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. T. O. Scholl, M. Leskiw, X. Chen, M. Sims, and T. P. Stein, “Oxidative stress, diet, and the etiology of preeclampsia,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 81, no. 6, pp. 1390–1396, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  43. C. Zhang, C. G. Solomon, J. E. Manson, and F. B. Hu, “A prospective study of pregravid physical activity and sedentary behaviors in relation to the risk for gestational diabetes mellitus,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 166, no. 5, pp. 543–548, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. T. K. Sorensen, M. A. Williams, I. M. Lee, E. E. Dashow, M. L. Thompson, and D. A. Luthy, “Recreational physical activity during pregnancy and risk of preeclampsia,” Hypertension, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1273–1280, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. M. I. Cedergren, “Maternal morbid obesity and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 219–224, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  46. T. E. O'Brien, J. G. Ray, and W. S. Chan, “Maternal body mass index and the risk of preeclampsia: a systematic overview,” Epidemiology, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 368–374, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. H. S. Ros, S. Cnattingius, and L. Lipworth, “Comparison of risk factors for preeclampsia and gestational hypertension in a population-based cohort study,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 147, no. 11, pp. 1062–1070, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  48. N. J. Sebire, M. Jolly, J. P. Harris et al., “Maternal obesity and pregnancy outcome: a study of 287 213 pregnancies in London,” International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 1175–1182, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  49. L. M. Bodnar, J. M. Catov, M. A. Klebanoff, R. B. Ness, and J. M. Roberts, “Prepregnancy body mass index and the occurrence of severe hypertensive disorders of pregnancy,” Epidemiology, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 234–239, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  50. J. G. Ray, M. J. Vermeulen, M. J. Schull, S. McDonald, and D. A. Redelmeier, “Metabolic syndrome and the risk of placental dysfunction,” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 1095–1101, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  51. M. Wolf, L. Sandler, K. Muñoz, K. Hsu, J. L. Ecker, and R. Thadhani, “First trimester insulin resistance and subsequent preeclampsia: a prospective study,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 1563–1568, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  52. L. M. Bodnar, G. Tang, R. B. Ness, G. Harger, and J. M. Roberts, “Periconceptional multivitamin use reduces the risk of preeclampsia,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 164, no. 5, pp. 470–477, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. C. Zhang, M. B. Schulze, C. G. Solomon, and F. B. Hu, “A prospective study of dietary patterns, meat intake and the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus,” Diabetologia, vol. 49, no. 11, pp. 2604–1613, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  54. S. C. Kalhan, “Protein metabolism in pregnancy,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 71, no. 5, supplement, pp. 1249S–1255S, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  55. E. Sivan and G. Boden, “Free fatty acids, insulin resistance, and pregnancy,” Current Diabetes Reports, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 319–322, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. J. M. Potter and P. J. Nestel, “The hyperlipidemia of pregnancy in normal and complicated pregnancies,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 133, no. 2, pp. 165–170, 1979. View at Google Scholar
  57. J. Bonnar, L. Daly, and B. L. Sheppard, “Changes in the fibrinolytic system during pregnancy,” Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 221–229, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  58. D. M. Sherer and O. Abulafia, “Angiogenesis during implantation, and placental and early embryonic development,” Placenta, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  59. A. Yessoufou, A. Hichami, P. Besnard, K. Moutairou, and N. A. Khan, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α deficiency increases the risk of maternal abortion and neonatal mortality in murine pregnancy with or without diabetes mellitus: modulation of T cell differentiation,” Endocrinology, vol. 147, no. 9, pp. 4410–4418, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  60. Y. Barak, D. Liao, W. He et al., “Effects of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor d on placentation, adiposity, and colorectal cancer,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 303–308, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  61. N. Kubota, Y. Terauchi, H. Miki et al., “PPAR? mediates high-fat diet-induced adipocyte hypertrophy and insulin resistance,” Molecular Cell, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 597–609, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  62. Y.-J. Zhu, S. E. Crawford, V. Stellmach et al., “Coactivator PRIP, the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-interacting protein, is a modulator of placental, cardiac, hepatic, and embryonic development,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 3, pp. 1986–1990, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  63. P. Antonson, G. U. Schuster, L. Wang et al., “Inactivation of the nuclear receptor coactivator RAP250 in mice results in placental vascular dysfunction,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1260–1268, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  64. V. Sapin, P. Dollé, C. Hindelang, P. Kastner, and P. Chambon, “Defects of the chorioallantoic placenta in mouse RXRα null fetuses,” Developmental Biology, vol. 191, no. 1, pp. 29–41, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  65. B. Sibai, G. Dekker, and M. Kupferminc, “Pre-eclampsia,” The Lancet, vol. 365, no. 9461, pp. 785–799, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  66. J. M. Roberts and C. W. G. Redman, “Pre-eclampsia: more than pregnancy-induced hypertension,” The Lancet, vol. 341, no. 8858, pp. 1447–1451, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  67. G. T. R. Manten, M. J. Sikkema, H. A. M. Voorbij, G. H. A. Visser, H. W. Bruinse, and A. Franx, “Risk factors for cardiovascular disease in women with a history of pregnancy complicated by preeclampsia or intrauterine growth restriction,” Hypertension in Pregnancy, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 39–50, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  68. V. A. Rodie, D. J. Freeman, N. Sattar, and I. A. Greer, “Pre-eclampsia and cardiovascular disease: metabolic syndrome of pregnancy?” Atherosclerosis, vol. 175, no. 2, pp. 189–202, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  69. J. Newstead, P. von Dadelszen, and L. A. Magee, “Preeclampsia and future cardiovascular risk,” Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 283–294, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  70. R. J. Kaaja and I. A. Greer, “Manifestations of chronic disease during pregnancy,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 294, no. 21, pp. 2751–2757, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  71. I. A. Brosens, P. De Sutter, T. Hamerlynck et al., “Endometriosis is associated with a decreased risk of pre-eclampsia,” Human Reproduction, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 1725–1729, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  72. F. Xue and K. B. Michels, “Intrauterine factors and risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence,” Lancet Oncology, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 1088–1100, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  73. J. Vamecq and N. Latruffe, “Medical significance of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors,” The Lancet, vol. 354, no. 9173, pp. 141–148, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  74. J. M. Lehmann, L. B. Moore, T. A. Smith-Oliver, W. O. Wilkison, T. M. Willson, and S. A. Kliewer, “An antidiabetic thiazolidinedione is a high affinity ligand for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ),” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 270, no. 22, pp. 12953–12956, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  75. H. Vosper, G. A. Khoudoli, T. L. Graham, and C. N. Palmer, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonists, hyperlipidaemia, and atherosclerosis,” Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 47–62, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  76. C. Chambrier, J.-P. Bastard, J. Rieusset et al., “Eicosapentaenoic acid induces mRNA expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor ?,” Obesity Research, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 518–525, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  77. S. A. Kliewer, J. M. Lenhard, T. M. Willson, I. Patel, D. C. Morris, and J. M. Lehmann, “A prostaglandin J2 metabolite binds peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ and promotes adipocyte differentiation,” Cell, vol. 83, no. 5, pp. 813–819, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  78. G. Chinetti, J.-C. Fruchart, and B. Staels, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs): nuclear receptors at the crossroads between lipid metabolism and inflammation,” Inflammation Research, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 497–505, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  79. L. Waite, E. C. Person, Y. Zhou, K.-H. Lim, T. S. Scanlan, and R. N. Taylor, “Placental peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ is up-regulated by pregnancy serum,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 85, no. 10, pp. 3808–3814, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  80. Q. Wang, H. Fujii, and G. T. Knipp, “Expression of PPAR and RXR isoforms in the developing rat and human term placentas,” Placenta, vol. 23, no. 8-9, pp. 661–671, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  81. A. Tarrade, R. Lai Kuen, A. Malassiné et al., “Characterization of human villous and extravillous trophoblasts isolated from first trimester placenta,” Laboratory Investigation, vol. 81, no. 9, pp. 1199–1211, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  82. T. Fournier, L. Pavan, A. Tarrade et al., “The role of PPAR-?/RXR-a heterodimers in the regulation of human trophoblast invasion,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 973, pp. 26–30, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  83. A. Tarrade, K. Schoonjans, J. Guibourdenche et al., “PPAR?/RXRa heterodimers are involved in human CGß synthesis and human trophoblast differentiation,” Endocrinology, vol. 142, no. 10, pp. 4504–4514, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  84. R. L. Schild, W. T. Schaiff, M. G. Carlson, E. J. Cronbach, D. M. Nelson, and Y. Sadovsky, “The activity of PPARγ in primary human trophoblasts is enhanced by oxidized lipids,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 1105–1110, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  85. M. Lappas, M. Permezel, and G. E. Rice, “Leptin and adiponectin stimulate the release of proinflammatory cytokines and prostaglandins from human placenta and maternal adipose tissue via nuclear factor-κB, peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor-γ and extracellularly regulated kinase 1/2,” Endocrinology, vol. 146, no. 8, pp. 3334–3342, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  86. W. T. Schaiff, I. Bildirici, M. Cheong, P. L. Chern, D. M. Nelson, and Y. Sadovsky, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ and retinoid X receptor signaling regulate fatty acid uptake by primary human placental Trophoblasts,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 90, no. 7, pp. 4267–4275, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  87. T. Shalom-Barak, J. M. Nicholas, Y. Wang et al., “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor ? controls Muc1 transcription in trophoblasts,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 24, no. 24, pp. 10661–10669, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  88. R. Asami-Miyagishi, S. Iseki, M. Usui, K. Uchida, H. Kubo, and I. Morita, “Expression and function of PPARγ in rat placental development,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 315, no. 2, pp. 497–501, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  89. E. Capobianco, A. Jawerbaum, M. C. Romanini et al., “15-deoxy-?12,14-prostaglandin J2 and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor ? (PPAR?) levels in term placental tissues from control and diabetic rats: modulatory effects of a PPAR? agonist on nitridergic and lipid placental metabolism,” Reproduction, Fertility and Development, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 423–433, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  90. M. Lappas, M. Permezel, H. M. Georgiou, and G. E. Rice, “Regulation of proinflammatory cytokines in human gestational tissues by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ: effect of 15-deoxy-Δ12,14-PGJ2 and troglitazone,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 87, no. 10, pp. 4667–4672, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  91. K. W. Marvin, R. L. Eykholt, J. A. Keelan, T. A. Sato, and M. D. Mitchell, “The 15-deoxy-Δ12,14-prostaglandin J2 receptor, peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-γ (PPARγ) is expressed in human gestational tissues and is functionally active in JEG3 choriocarcinoma cells,” Placenta, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 436–440, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  92. L. R. Dunn-Albanese, W. E. Ackerman IV, Y. Xie, J. D. Iams, and D. A. Kniss, “Reciprocal expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ and cyclooxygenase-2 in human term parturition,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 190, no. 3, pp. 809–816, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  93. E. B. E. Berry, R. Eykholt, R. J. A. Helliwell, R. S. Gilmour, M. D. Mitchell, and K. W. Marvin, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor isoform expression changes in human gestational tissues with labor at term,” Molecular Pharmacology, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 1586–1590, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  94. O. Wendling, P. Chambon, and M. Mark, “Retinoid X receptors are essential for early mouse development and placentogenesis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 547–551, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  95. L. L. H. Peeters, J.-L. Vigne, M. K. Tee, D. Zhao, L. Waite, and R. N. Taylor, “PPARγ represses VEGF expression in human endometrial cells: implications for uterine angiogenesis,” Angiogenesis, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 373–379, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  96. H. Bamba, S. Ota, A. Kato, C. Kawamoto, and K. Fujiwara, “Prostaglandins up-regulate vascular endothelial growth factor production through distinct pathways in differentiated U937 cells,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 273, no. 2, pp. 485–491, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  97. V. Chintalgattu, G. S. Harris, S. M. Akula, and L. C. Katwa, “PPAR-γ agonists induce the expression of VEGF and its receptors in cultured cardiac myofibroblasts,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 140–150, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  98. K. Yamakawa, M. Hosoi, H. Koyama et al., “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-? agonists increase vascular endothelial growth factor expression in human vascular smooth muscle cells,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 271, no. 3, pp. 571–574, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  99. K. Handschuh, J. Guibourdenche, M. Guesnon, I. Laurendeau, D. Evain-Brion, and T. Fournier, “Modulation of PAPP-A expression by PPARγ in human first trimester trophoblast,” Placenta, vol. 27, 1, pp. 127–134, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  100. B. M. Forman, P. Tontonoz, J. Chen, R. P. Brun, B. M. Spiegelman, and R. M. Evans, “15-deoxy-Δ12,14-prostaglandin J2 is a ligand for the adipocyte determination factor PPARγ,” Cell, vol. 83, no. 5, pp. 803–812, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  101. R. L. Schild, C. M. Sonnenberg-Hirche, W. T. Schaiff, I. Bildirici, D. M. Nelson, and Y. Sadovsky, “The kinase p38 regulates peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-γ in human trophoblasts,” Placenta, vol. 27, no. 2-3, pp. 191–199, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  102. S. S.-T. Lee and F. J. Gonzalez, “Targeted disruption of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α gene, PPARα,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 804, no. 1, pp. 524–529, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  103. G. B. Dealtry, M. K. O'Farrell, and N. Fernandez, “The Th2 cytokine environment of the placenta,” International Archives of Allergy and Immunology, vol. 123, no. 2, pp. 107–119, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  104. J. C. Huang, W. S. Wun, J. S. Goldsby, I. C. Wun, D. Noorhasan, and K. K. Wu, “Stimulation of embryo hatching and implantation by prostacyclin and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor δ activation: implication in IVF,” Human Reproduction, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 807–814, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  105. H. Lim and S. K. Dey, “PPARδ functions as a prostacyclin receptor in blastocyst implantation,” Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 137–142, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  106. M. Lappas, M. Permezel, H. M. Georgiou, and G. E. Rice, “Nuclear factor κ B regulation of proinflammatory cytokines in human gestational tissues in vitro,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 668–673, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  107. S. A. Törnblom, F. A. Patel, B. Byström et al., “15-Hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase and cyclooxygenase 2 messenger ribonucleic acid expression and immunohistochemical localization in human cervical tissue during term and preterm labor,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 89, no. 6, pp. 2909–2915, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  108. M. Lappas, M. Permezel, and G. E. Rice, “15-deoxy-Δ12,14-rostaglandin J2 and troglitazone regulation of the release of phospholipid metabolites, inflammatory cytokines and proteases from guman gestational tissues,” Placenta, vol. 27, no. 11-12, pp. 1060–1072, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  109. E. T. McKinney, R. Shouri, R. S. Hunt, R. A. Ahokas, and B. M. Sibai, “Plasma, urinary, and salivary 8-epi-prostaglandin F2α levels in normotensive and preeclamptic pregnancies,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 183, no. 4, pp. 874–877, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  110. D. B. Klinkner, H. J. Lim, E. Y. Strawn Jr., K. T. Oldham, and T. L. Sander, “An in vivo murine model of rosiglitazone use in pregnancy,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 86, no. 4, supplement 1, pp. 1074–1079, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  111. L. Waite, R. E. Louie, and R. N. Taylor, “Circulating activators of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors are reduced in preeclamptic pregnancy,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 620–626, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  112. E. C. Tok, D. Ertunc, O. Bilgin, E. M. Erdal, M. Kaplanoglu, and S. Dilek, “PPAR-γ2 Pro12Ala polymorphism is associated with weight gain in women with gestational diabetes mellitus,” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology & Reproductive Biology, vol. 129, no. 1, pp. 25–30, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  113. A. Jawerbaum, E. Capobianco, C. Pustovrh et al., “Influence of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor ? activation by its endogenous ligand 15-deoxy?12,14 prostaglandin J2 on nitric oxide production in term placental tissues from diabetic women,” Molecular Human Reproduction, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 671–676, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  114. L. Capparuccia, D. Marzioni, A. Giordano et al., “PPAR? expression in normal human placenta, hydatidiform mole and choriocarcinoma,” Molecular Human Reproduction, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 574–579, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  115. V. A. Rodie, A. Young, F. Jordan, N. Sattar, I. A. Greer, and D. J. Freeman, “Human placental peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor δ and γ expression in healthy pregnancy and in preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction,” Journal of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 320–329, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  116. A. Meirhaeghe, C. A. G. Boreham, L. J. Murray et al., “A possible role for the PPARG Pro12Ala polymorphism in preterm birth,” Diabetes, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 494–498, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  117. J. R. Higgins and M. de Swiet, “Blood-pressure measurement and classification in pregnancy,” The Lancet, vol. 357, no. 9250, pp. 131–135, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  118. A. P. Mackay, C. J. Berg, and H. K. Atrash, “Pregnancy-related mortality from preeclampsia and eclampsia,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 533–538, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  119. R. N. Taylor, C. J. M. de Groot, Y. K. Cho, and K.-H. Lim, “Circulating factors as markers and mediators of endothelial cell dysfunction in preeclampsia,” Seminars in Reproductive Endocrinology, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 17–31, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  120. Y. Hamai, T. Fujii, T. Yamashita et al., “Evidence for an elevation in serum interleukin-2 and tumor necrosis factor-a levels before the clinical manifestations of preeclampsia,” American Journal of Reproductive Immunology, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 89–93, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  121. K.-A. Wathén, E. Tuutti, U.-H. Stenman et al., “Maternal serum-soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 in early pregnancy ending in preeclampsia or intrauterine growth retardation,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 180–184, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  122. S.-M. Yie, L.-H. Li, Y.-M. Li, and C. Librach, “HLA-G protein concentrations in maternal serum and placental tissue are decreased in preeclampsia,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 191, no. 2, pp. 525–529, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  123. R. Thadhani, W. P. Mutter, M. Wolf et al., “First trimester placental growth factor and soluble FMS-like tyrosine kinase 1 and risk for preeclampsia,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 770–775, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  124. D. V. Coonrod, D. E. Hickok, K. Zu, T. R. Easterling, and J. R. Daling, “Risk factors for preeclampsia in twin pregnancies: a population-based cohort study,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 85, no. 5, part 1, pp. 645–650, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  125. M. J. McMahon, C. V. Ananth, and R. M. Liston, “Gestational diabetes mellitus: risk factors, obstetric complications and infant outcomes,” Journal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 372–378, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  126. M. Tanaka, G. Jaamaa, M. Kaiser et al., “Racial disparity in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in New York state: a 10-year longitudinal population-based study,” American Journal of Public Health, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 163–170, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  127. B. A. Beamer, C.-J. Yen, R. E. Andersen et al., “Association of the Pro12Ala variant in the peroxisome proliferator- activated receptor-?2 gene with obesity in two Caucasian populations,” Diabetes, vol. 47, no. 11, pp. 1806–1808, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  128. S. J. Hasstedt, Q.-F. Ren, K. Teng, and S. C. Elbein, “Effect of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ2 Pro12Ala variant on obesity, glucose homeostasis, and blood pressure in members of familial type 2 diabetic kindreds,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 536–541, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  129. W.-D. Li, J. H. Lee, and R. A. Price, “The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ2 Pro12Ala mutation is associated with early onset extreme obesity and reduced fasting glucose,” Molecular Genetics and Metabolism, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 159–161, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  130. S. S. Deeb, L. Fajas, M. Nemoto et al., “A Pro12Ala substitution in PPAR?2 associated with decreased receptor activity, lower body mass index and improved insulin sensitivity,” Nature Genetics, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 284–287, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  131. J. Laasanen, S. Heinonen, M. Hiltunen, A. Mannermaa, and M. Laakso, “Polymorphism in the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ gene in women with preeclampsia,” Early Human Development, vol. 69, no. 1-2, pp. 77–82, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  132. C. A. Hubel, “Oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia,” Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine, vol. 222, no. 3, pp. 222–235, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  133. B. W. Arbogast, S. C. Leeper, R. D. Merrick, K. E. Olive, and R. N. Taylor, “Which plasma factors bring about disturbance of endothelial function in pre-eclampsia?” The Lancet, vol. 343, no. 8893, pp. 340–341, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  134. C. W. G. Redman and I. L. Sargent, “Pre-eclampsia, the placenta and the maternal systemic inflammatory response—a review,” Placenta, vol. 24, 1, pp. S21–S27, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  135. M. J. Reginato, S. L. Krakow, S. T. Bailey, and M. A. Lazar, “Prostaglandins promote and block adipogenesis through opposing effects on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 273, no. 4, pp. 1855–1858, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  136. P. L. Ogburn Jr., S. B. Johnson, P. P. Williams, and R. T. Holman, “Levels of free fatty acids and arachidonic acid in pregnancy and labor,” Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine, vol. 95, no. 6, pp. 943–949, 1980. View at Google Scholar
  137. P. L. Ogburn Jr., P. P. Williams, S. B. Johnson, and R. T. Holman, “Serum arachidonic acid levels in normal and preeclamptic pregnancies,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 148, no. 1, pp. 5–9, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  138. C. J. M. de Groot, J. T. Murai, J.-L. Vigne, and R. N. Taylor, “Eicosanoid secretion by human endothelial cells exposed to normal pregnancy and preeclampsia plasma in vitro,” Prostaglandins Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 91–97, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  139. D. Hornung, I. P. Ryan, V. A. Chao, J.-L. Vigne, E. D. Schriock, and R. N. Taylor, “Immunolocalization and regulation of the chemokine RANTES in human endometrial and endometriosis tissues and cells,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 82, no. 5, pp. 1621–1628, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  140. S. Blackburn and D. Loper, Maternal Fetal and Neonatal Physiology: A Clinical Perspective, Harcourt Brace Jovanovic, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 1992.
  141. W. W. Hay Jr., “Placental transport of nutrients to the fetus,” Hormone Research, vol. 42, no. 4-5, pp. 215–222, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  142. L. Jovanovic and D. J. Pettitt, “Gestational diabetes mellitus,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 286, no. 20, pp. 2516–2518, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  143. C. B. Rudra, T. K. Sorensen, W. M. Leisenring, E. Dashow, and M. A. Williams, “Weight characteristics and height in relation to risk of gestational diabetes mellitus,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 165, no. 3, pp. 302–308, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  144. F. Galtier-Dereure, C. Boegner, and J. Bringer, “Obesity and pregnancy: complications and cost,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 71, no. 5, supplement, pp. 1242S–1248S, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  145. P. M. Catalano, “Increasing maternal obesity and weight gain during pregnancy: the obstetric problems of plentitude,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 110, no. 4, pp. 743–744, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  146. C. J. P. Jones and H. Fox, “Placental changes in gestational diabetes. An ultrastructural study,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 274–280, 1976. View at Google Scholar
  147. A. Åberg, H. Rydhstroem, and A. Frid, “Impaired glucose tolerance associated with adverse pregnancy outcome: a population-based study in southern Sweden,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 184, no. 2, pp. 77–83, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  148. D. B. Carr, K. M. Utzschneider, R. L. Hull et al., “Gestational diabetes mellitus increases the risk of cardiovascular disease in women with a family history of type 2 diabetes,” Diabetes Care, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 2078–2083, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  149. H. Lee, H. C. Jang, H. K. Park, and N. H. Cho, “Early manifestation of cardiovascular disease risk factors in offspring of mothers with previous history of gestational diabetes mellitus,” Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 238–245, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  150. M. Morifuji, C. Sanbongi, and K. Sugiura, “Dietary soya protein intake and exercise training have an additive effect on skeletal muscle fatty acid oxidation enzyme activities and mRNA levels in rats,” British Journal of Nutrition, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 469–475, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  151. C. Zhang, S. Liu, C. G. Solomon, and F. B. Hu, “Dietary fiber intake, dietary glycemic load, and the risk for gestational diabetes mellitus,” Diabetes Care, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 2223–2230, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  152. E. Oken, Y. Ning, S. L. Rifas-Shiman, J. S. Radesky, J. W. Rich-Edwards, and M. W. Gillman, “Associations of physical activity and inactivity before and during pregnancy with glucose tolerance,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 108, no. 5, pp. 1200–1207, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  153. T. L. Weissgerber, L. A. Wolfe, G. A. L. Davies, and M. F. Mottola, “Exercise in the prevention and treatment of maternal-fetal disease: a review of the literature,” Applied Physiology, Nutrition and Metabolism, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 661–674, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  154. H. Leipold, M. Knoefler, C. Gruber, A. Huber, P. Haslinger, and C. Worda, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ coactivator-1α gene variations are not associated with gestational diabetes mellitus,” Journal of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 104–107, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  155. S. Fukuen, M. Iwaki, A. Yasui, M. Makishima, M. Matsuda, and I. Shimomura, “Sulfonylurea agents exhibit peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ agonistic activity,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 25, pp. 23653–23659, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  156. O. Langer, D. L. Conway, M. D. Berkus, E. M.-J. Xenakis, and O. Gonzales, “A comparison of glyburide and insulin in women with gestational diabetes mellitus,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 343, no. 16, pp. 1134–1138, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  157. C. Ferretti, L. Bruni, V. Dangles-Marie, A. P. Pecking, and D. Bellet, “Molecular circuits shared by placental and cancer cells, and their implications in the proliferative, invasive and migratory capacities of trophoblasts,” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 121–141, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  158. D. P. Hewitt, P. J. Mark, and B. J. Waddell, “Placental expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors in rat pregnancy and the effect of increased glucocorticoid exposure,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 23–28, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  159. W. T. Schaiff, F. F. Knapp Jr., Y. Barak, T. Biron-Shental, D. M. Nelson, and Y. Sadovsky, “Ligand-activated peroxisome proliferator activated receptor γ alters placental morphology and placental fatty acid uptake in mice,” Endocrinology, vol. 148, no. 8, pp. 3625–3634, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  160. J. A. Keelan, R. J. A. Helliwell, B. E. Nijmeijer et al., “15-deoxy-?12,14-prostaglandin J2-induced apoptosis in amnion-like WISH cells,” Prostaglandins & Other Lipid Mediators, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 265–282, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  161. H. Hasegawa, H. Takano, Y. Zou et al., “Pioglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor ? activator, ameliorates experimental autoimmune myocarditis by modulating Th1/Th2 balance,” Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 257–265, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  162. S. Dasgupta, A. Roy, M. Jana, D. M. Hartley, and K. Pahan, “Gemfibrozil ameliorates relapsing-remitting experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis independent of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α,” Molecular Pharmacology, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 934–946, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar