Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
PPAR Research
Volume 2009, Article ID 421376, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2009/421376
Review Article

Is PPAR a Prospective Player in HIV-1-Associated Bone Disease?

1Clinical Research Center, University College Dublin, Belfield, 4 Dublin, Ireland
2School of Medicine & Medical Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, 4 Dublin, Ireland

Received 30 June 2008; Revised 3 December 2008; Accepted 21 January 2009

Academic Editor: Lawrence Serfaty

Copyright © 2009 Eoin J. Cotter et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Currently infection with the human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) is in most instances a chronic disease that can be controlled by effective antiretroviral therapy (ART). However, chronic use of ART has been associated with a number of toxicities; including significant reductions in bone mineral density (BMD) and disorders of the fat metabolism. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR ) transcription factor is vital for the development and maintenance of mature and developing adipocytes. Alterations in PPAR expression have been implicated as a factor in the mechanism of HIV-1-associated lipodystrophy. Both reduced BMD and lipodystrophy have been well described as complications of HIV-1 infection and treatment, and a question remains as to their interdependence. Interestingly, both adipocytes and osteoblasts are derived from a common precursor cell type; the mesenchymal stem cell. The possibility that dysregulation of PPAR (and the subsequent effect on both osteoblastogenesis and adipogenesis) is a contributory factor in the lipid- and bone-abnormalities observed in HIV-1 infection and treatment has also been investigated. This review deals with the hypothesis that dysregulation of PPAR may underpin the bone abnormalities associated with HIV-1 infection, and treats the current knowledge and prospective developments, in our understanding of PPAR involvement in HIV-1-associated bone disease.

1. Introduction

Aside from the serious effects on the cells of the immune system, HIV-1 infection and its treatment have been associated with disorders in other tissues, most notably bone [1, 2] and adipose [36] tissues, where reduced bone mineral density (BMD) and abnormalities of the lipid metabolism (lipodystrophy, dyslipidemia, and insulin resistance) have been described. In both disorders (particularly those of the adipose tissue), antiretroviral treatment is believed to play a major role, but the contribution of underlying HIV-1 infection has yet to be elucidated, and therefore cannot be ignored as a potential causative factor.

PPARγ is a nuclear membrane bound transcription factor which regulates a number of genes involved in adipogenesis from common precursor cells type (mesenchymal stem cells), maturation of preadipocytes, lipid accumulation, and maintenance of adipogenic phenotype [7, 8]. As such, it is not surprising that a number of recent studies have indicated that certain drugs known to be associated with lipodystrophy dysregulate PPARγ [9, 10]. The involvement of PPARγ in HIV-1-associated bone disease is an area that has been little studied to date; however numerous studies suggest that PPARγ plays a role in conditions such as osteoporosis in the absence of HIV-1 or ART, and increased adipocyte content of osteoporotic bone has been reported [1012]. In addition, osteoblasts—the cells responsible for depositing bone—are derived from mesenchymal stem cells, and evidence suggests that the balance of PPARγ and the pro-osteogenic runt-related transcription factor-2 (RUNX-2) is a key in the determination of mesenchymal stem cell fate [1315]  (see Figure 1). This review will introduce the current knowledge of the role of PPARγ in bone biology in normal and disease states, and discuss its potential as a mechanism for HIV-1-associated bone disease.

421376.fig.001
Figure 1: Factors governing normal osteogenesis and adipogenesis from mesenchymal stem cells. Multipotent mesenchymal stem cells can differentiate into a number of cell types, including adipocytes and osteoblasts. ( indicates inhibition; indicates stimulation). The transcriptional coactivator Taz negatively regulates adipogenesis and promotes osteogenesis through suppression of PPARγ and activation of RUNX-2, while overexpression of PPARγ can reduce bone formation. Also, a number of other factors such as secreted proteins from Wnt family promote the differentiation and maintenance of osteoblasts while reducing the differentiation of the adipocytes. In addition, factors secreted by mature adipocytes, such as leptin and estrogen, can increase bone mass in vivo.

2. HIV-1-Associated Bone Disease

Osteoporosis is defined as a reduction in the bone mass and disruption of the microarchitecture of the bone which leads to a greatly increased risk of fractures, while osteopenia is a lesser reduction in bone density and strength which may remain asymptomatic, but can precede actual osteoporosis. The world health organization (WHO) definitions specify t-scores between −1 and −2.5 as being indicative of osteopenia, while t-scores of less than −2.5 are indicative of osteoporosis [16]. Fractures resulting from osteoporosis affect one in two women and one in five men over the age of 50, and are a significant financial burden to health services, with an estimated combined annual cost of 30 billion Euro in the EU [17].

As will be discussed further, bone remodeling is dependent on the opposing functions of two cell types, osteoblasts, which make new bone (bone formation), and osteoclasts, which destroy old bone (bone resorption). Therefore, the balance between the number and activity of osteoclasts and osteoblasts is crucial in normal bone homeostasis; the perturbation of which can directly lead to increased bone fragility and fracture risk. Two important molecules: macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) and receptor for activation of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL) produced from osteoblast/stromal cells regulate the differentiation, function, and survival of osteoclasts, while the transcription factors, RUNX-2 and Osterix, have been reported to regulate osteoblast differentiation [18].

2.1. HIV-1 Infection and Bone Disease

Bone metabolism in HIV-infected individuals has been studied since the late 1980s, although the number of early studies is somewhat limited. Before the widespread use of highly active ART, studies indicated that bone mineral metabolism was only minimally affected in HIV-infected patients. Serrano et al. assessed histomorphometry in HIV-positive patients and found that parameters of histomorphometry such as serum osteocalcin were found to be lower in patients who, according to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) classification, had greater disease severity [19]. Paton et al. reported that 45 HIV-infected patients had marginally lower BMD at the lumbar spine. None of the patients had reduced BMD to levels associated with a diagnosis of osteoporosis [20]. More recently however, it became clear that reduced BMD is also frequent in the absence of therapy [2124]. In a study by McGowan et al., the prevalence of osteopenia among antiretroviral-naive HIV-positive individuals to be approximately 28%, which is approximately 50% greater than the expected incidence in the general, uninfected population [25]. Studies which have included patients with more advanced HIV disease who have received treatment for longer periods have reported prevalence of 40% to 50% [26, 27], placing reduced BMD among the most common HIV-1-associated metabolic toxicities. Amiel et al. also assessed BMD in 48 HIV-infected treatment-naive patients, 49 HIV-infected patients on protein inhibitors, 51 HIV-infected patients on no-protein inhibitors, and 81 HIV-uninfected control subjects. The results showed a significant decrease of BMD (9%) in all HIV-infected patients compared to the control subjects, occurring concurrently with a lower bone alkaline phosphatase and higher urinary cross-laps/Cr. [28]. The clinical impact of this reduced BMD is beginning to be examined; recent studies in a large American health care system, involving 8526 HIV infected patients and over 2 million control subjects, demonstrated that the prevalence of any fracture type was significantly higher in the HIV-infected population (2.87 versus 1.77 fractures/100 persons, ). This study did not specify the treatment status of their subjects, but the data suggests that HIV-1-related fractures are a significant and growing clinical issue [29].

2.2. Antiviral Treatment and Bone Diseases

Antiretroviral treatment (ART) is a complex therapeutic regimen, in which patients typically take 2-3 agents selected from an array of 30 approved antiretroviral agents. ART, in general, comprises of two major therapeutic strategies: a protease inhibitor- (PI-) based regimen and a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor- (NRTI-) based regimen. The PI-based regimen uses one or two PIs combined with two NRTIs, whereas the NRTI-based regimen uses two NRTIs combined with one non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI). With more effective therapies as a result of HAART, the prevalence of HAART-associated bone diseases has increased [30].

A higher incidence of reduced BMD has been clinically associated with both PI and NRTI uses. Tebas et al. determined that in HIV-1 patients receiving PIs about 50% of the patients had osteopenia and other 21% had osteoporosis [31]. This incidence is significantly increased compared to patients without therapy or normal controls. Studies by Moore et al. confirmed that 71% of HIV-infected patients on PI therapy have reduced BMD [32]. Similarly, Carr et al. reported that 3% of 44 HIV-infected patients receiving NRTIs developed osteoporosis and 22% developed osteopenia [33], while in a study examining HIV-1-infected men Mallon determined a reduction in BMD beginning at 48 weeks postinitiation of treatment [6]. Tsekes et al. determined BMD and whole body fat by dual energy X-ray absorbance (DEXA) of HIV-infected patients receiving zidovudine and other NRTIs and found significant decreases in both body fat and BMD [34]. In addition, the recent analysis by Brown and Qaqish [35] also reported 2.5-fold increased odds of reduced BMD in ART-treated patients compared with ART-naive patients (95% CI 1.8, 3.7). However, most studies are in agreement that traditional risk factors for osteoporosis, such as ethnic variations, female sex, increasing age, low body mass index, and time since menopause, are all independent predictors of osteopenia/osteoporosis [3640].

In addition, it has been noted that HIV-infected patients have an increased risk for osteonecrosis of the hip [41]. Keruly et al. reported 15 cases of avascular hip necrosis in HIV-infected patients and suggested that the incidence of osteonecrosis in HIV-infected patients was higher than the general HIV-negative population [42]. It is not known whether this phenomenon is attributable to HIV-1 infection itself, HAART, or other HIV-associated complications.

The mechanisms by which either HIV-1 or its treatment induces reduced BMD are as yet unclear, and several researchers have suggested that reduced vitamin D levels observed in HIV-1-infected patients, and particularly the reduced levels of the biologically active metabolite 1,25(OH D (which is the natural ligand for the vitamin D receptor (VDR)), may contribute to reduced BMD [43]. Studies have demonstrated that the level of 1,25(OH D in HIV-1-infected patients is between 5 and 50% lower than that in infected patients [24, 44, 45]. In addition, studies have indicated that patients receiving treatment are more likely to have greater reductions in 1,25(OH D, with a recent Dutch study suggesting that NNRTI treatment may increase the risk of vitamin D deficiency [46, 47]. In addition, the latter study demonstrated that patients receiving treatment also have increased parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels, increasing the potential risk of reduced bone mass.

In short, HIV-1-associated bone disorders are a significant and increasingly well-defined clinical issue. However, the molecular basis underpinning these clinical observations remains to be fully explained.

3. PPARγ: Mediator of Development and Disease in Bone Biology

As discussed previously, maintenance of bone homeostasis is mediated through a balance of osteoblast-mediated bone deposition and osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. The continued production of these cells from stromal (mesenchymal) and hematopoietic (monocyte) precursors, respectively, is an essential component in the maintenance of BMD. Stromal progenitor or mesencymal stem cells are multipotent cells, capable of producing cells of a number of different lineages, including osteoblasts and adipocytes [4749].

Since the early 1990s, researchers have hypothesized that a “see-saw” relationship exists in the bone marrow cavity, where production of adipocytes from stromal precursors is at the expense of osteoblast production and vice versa [50, 51]. This theory is born out by a clinically observed phenomenon, such as the increased adipocyte content of osteoporotic and aging bone [5153] as well as studies where agents inducing adipocyte production reduced osteoblast number [49, 50]. Likewise, treatment of bone marrow stromal cells with bone morphogenic proteins (BMPs) resulted in reduced formation of adipocytes [53]. Adipocytes can also produce secreted factors such leptin and estrogen, which can positively regulate bone mass [13, 54, 55], further underlining the interrelated nature of bone and fat development (see Figure 1).

PPARs are ligand-activated nuclear hormone receptors which stimulate expression of genes containing peroxisome proliferator response elements (PPREs)  [53, 54]. There are three principal members of this family, PPARα, PPARδ, and PPARγ, activation of which stimulates genes involved in fatty acid oxidation, uncoupling of respiration toward heat production (thermoregulation) and terminal adipocyte differentiation (including intracellular lipid accumulation), respectively, (see Table 1)  [49, 50, 5559].

tab1
Table 1: PPARγ-regulated genes involved in adiogenesis, glucose uptake, and thermoregulation ( positive regulation; negative regulation).

The activity of PPARγ and RUNX-2 is a key to our understanding of the relationship between fat and bone. Activity of the RUNX-2 transcription factor is not only essential for maintenance of osteoblast phenotype, but it is also involved in driving the differentiation of osteoblasts from mesenchymal stem cells [1114], while activity of PPARγ in mesenchymal stem cells induces differentiation into adipocytes. The eventual phenotype of the differentiating cell is generally considered to be controlled by an antagonistic balance between RUNX-2 and PPARγ [13, 14]. Studies have demonstrated, for example, that activation of PPARγ using pharmacological agents can lead to decreased bone mass in vivo, while mice lacking the PPARγ gene display increased bone mass and an inability to develop adipocytes [5961]. Indeed, even in the eventual mature cell, the function can be altered by dysregulating this balance, with in vivo studies using a mouse model demonstrating reduced bone formation rate and suppression of RUNX-2 in osteoblasts in which PPARγ had been activated [61], while Kim et al. have demonstrated that activation of PPARγ induces death through a MAPK-dependant mechanism in osteoblastic cells [62].

PPARγ deficient mice (having a mutation in the PPARγ2 locus) have been generated and display a “lipodystrophic” phenotype, which occurs concurrently with increased bone mass, to the point where the bone marrow is almost completely occluded and hematopoiesis moves to extramedullary sites, such as the spleen [61, 63]. Recently, our understanding of the roles of PPARγ in numerous physiologic processes, including the bone/fat paradigm, has been furthered by the development of the thiazolidinedione (TDZ) family of PPARγ ligands, such as netoglitazone, pioglitazone, rosiglitazone, and GW0072 [6467]. Studies have demonstrated that treatment of murine osteoblasts with netoglitazone and GW0072 can block osteoblast differentiation, without inducing adipogenesis [62, 64], while in vivo studies have demonstrated that rosiglitazone, a ligand with higher affinity for PPARγ, decreased bone mineral density, bone formation rate, and trabecular bone volume, while increasing adipogenesis [65, 67]. Further studies on ovariectomized rats revealed that these effects are mediated in part by the suppression of the RUNX-2 transcription factor [67], giving further strength to the argument that an antagonistic relationship between PPARγ and RUNX-2 governs bone and fat formation. Indeed, Hong et al. have demonstrated that shared coactivator protein, TAZ, accounts in some part for this relationship, in that it coactivates RUNX-2 and bone formation, while suppressing PPARγ [68].

3.1. PPARγ in HIV-1-Associated Lipodystrophy

ART is associated with changes in fat metabolism, broadly termed lipodystrophy (changes in fat distribution) or lipoatrophy (atrophy of adipose tissue). Severe forms of lipodystrophy are a major cosmetic concern, and can lead to suboptimal adherence to therapy. In addition, lipodystrophy is associated with markers of cardiovascular risk, such as insulin resistance and dyslipidemia [5].

In vitro, expression of PPARγ is decreased by exposure to anti-HIV-1 PI and NRTI drugs. In differentiating adipocytes, exposure to nelfinavir, saquinavir, and ritonavir at 10  M concentrations resulted in decreased adipogenesis and expression of the PPARγ-mediated mRNA encoding aP2 and lipoprotein lipase (LPL)  [10]. Similar effects on PPARγ expression were observed in 3T3-F442A adipocyte cells exposed to 10–50  M indinavir [69], while studies by the same group have also demonstrated that the nuclear association of the PPARγ regulator SREBP-1 is reduced by treatment with indinavir [70]. In mature adipocytes, inhibition of PPARγ function by expression of a dominant negative PPARγ isoform results in decreased accumulation of intracellular triglyceride, decreased cell size, and decreased expression of genes involved in both fatty acid and glucose metabolism, including the glucose transporter GLUT-4 [71]. In lipoatrophic mice, ablation of PPARγ activity in liver resulted in hepatic steatosis, hypertriglyceridemia, and muscle insulin resistance [72]. Many of these features are shared by PI-treated patients with HIV-1-associated lipodystrophy.

In vivo, patients with lipodystrophy had lower adipose tissue expression of both PPARδ and PPARγ than those without lipodystrophy. This was accompanied by decreases in a number of PPARγ-responsive downstream genes including LPL and GLUT-4 [73, 74]. In studies by Mallon, NRTI treatment of non-HIV-1-infected subjects (either stavudine/lamivudine or zidovudine/lamivudine for six weeks) resulted in reduced PPARγ expression in adipose tissue (alongside alterations in transcription of mitochondrial DNA, and upregulation of genes associated with mitochondrial transcriptional regulation), although in this study the effects on overall fat mass were not determined [9].

In patients with type 2 diabetes, exposure to TZD, which act as PPARγ ligands, resulted in increased expression of PPARγ-target genes such as LPL and fatty acid synthase (FAS) in subcutaneous adipose tissue biopsies, without increasing expression of PPARγ itself [71]. However, studies utilizing TZD to treat lipodystrophy have produced variable, and at best, modest results [7578]. More recently, van Wijk et al. demonstrated that rosiglitazone treatment, compared to treatment with metformin, increased subcutaneous abdominal and visceral abdominal fat in lipodystrophy, however this was a small study ( ), was not blinded or placebo controlled, and did not measure clinical outcomes [79].

The weight clinical and scientific evidence suggests that HIV-1/ART-associated lipid abnormalities occur largely as a result of treatment rather than infection. However, a recent study raised the possibility that there may also be a viral component; Shrivastav et al. [80] demonstrated that treatment with the HIV-1 accessory viral protein R (Vpr) could suppress PPARγ-induced transactivation in 3T3-L1 murine adipocyte cells, with a consequent inhibition of adipocyte differentiation. Vpr is a 96-amino-acid accessory protein, which is packaged in the viral capsid, and is found in the nucleus early after cell infection [81, 82]. Among the functions of Vpr is its ability to act as a transcriptional activator of viral and cellular promoters [8386]. Vpr enhances the activity of steroid hormone receptors, including the gluticorticoid receptor (GR), which Vpr can bind via its LXXLL motif [85]. Studies involving cotransfection with constructs expressing wild type and mutant (LXXLL null) Vpr constructs with reporter constructs containing the PPRE demonstrated that this phenomenon was dependent on the LXXLL motif. Further experiments demonstrated that the GR did not play a role, and that Vpr and PPARγ interacted directly in living cells. The authors of this study hypothesize that in vivo circulating Vpr, or Vpr produced as a result of direct infection of adipocytes, could suppress differentiation of preadipocytes in a PPARγ dependent manner with obvious consequences for the development of lipodystrophy and insulin resistance [80].

3.2. PPARγ in HIV-1-Associated Bone Disease

In contrast to the clearly defined role for PPARγ in HIV-1/ART-associated lipid abnormalities, few studies have focused on its potential impact in HIV-1/ART-associated bone abnormalities.

To date, studies into mechanism of reduced bone density have been understandably focused on two distinct strands, namely, the effects on osteoblast and osteoclast number and function. In the case of OC research, several studies have demonstrated that osteoclast function can be altered in vitro by treatment with both ritonavir and HIV-1 gp120 [87, 88]. Jain et al. demonstrated that osteoclast activity, measured using a rat neonatal calvaria assay, increased in the presence of nelfinavir, indinavir, saquinavir, or ritonavir, while lopinavir and amprenavir did not increase osteoclast activity. In addition, Pan et al. reported a significant increase in markers of osteoclastogenesis (namely, the activity of the tartaric acid phosphatase (TRAP) promoter and the NF-κb transcription factor) in RAW264.7 (mouse leukemic monocyte macrophage cell line cells) and primary mouse osteoclast precursors treated with the NRTI zidovudine [89]. This same group has more recently reported that the NRTIs ddi and lamiduvine also induced osteoclastogenesis in vitro and osteopenia in an in vivo mouse model [90].

Similarly, osteoblast-based studies have produced some interesting data. Clinically, Serrano et al. reported reduced numbers of osteoclasts in HIV patients; a phenomenon occurring along side-reduced serum osteocalcin levels and bone formation rate [19]. Previous and ongoing in vitro studies by our own group have demonstrated that osteoblast activity (as measured by calcium deposition and alkaline phosphatase activity) can be reduced by a number of antiretroviral drugs (including both nelfinavir and indinavir). In addition, these studies identified tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-3 (TIMP-3) as a mechanism for this observed loss in osteoblast function [91]. Further studies by our group demonstrated that treatment with the HIV-1 proteins p55-gag and gp120 reduced osteoblast activity in conjunction with reduction RUNX-2 transcription factor activity [92]. Interestingly, gp120 both decreased RUNX-2 activity and increased PPARγ. Furthermore, our studies investigating the effect of HIV-1 proteins on mesenchymal stem cell differentiation have suggested that the proteins p55 and REV alter both mesenchymal stem cell osteoblastic differentiation and RUNX-2/PPARγ signalling in nondifferentiating mesenchymal stem cells [93].

Although these studies used a somewhat simplistic model of HIV-1 exposure, given the evidence of the impact of PPARγ on normal bone biology, and the observation that it can be perturbed in HIV-1-associated lipodystrophy, it is tempting to interpret these results as being suggestive of PPARγ playing a role in HIV-1-mediated bone disease. However, there is an obvious stumbling block for this hypothesis, namely, that if increased PPARγ activity in mesenchymal stem cell and osteoblasts could result in reduced bone mass, it would surely also increase fat mass. This picture is further complicated, as previously discussed studies have demonstrated that treatment of non-HIV-1-infected subjects with NNRTIs resulted in reduced PPARγ expression in adipose tissue [9], while in vitro studies with 3T3-F442A cells have demonstrated that both PPARγ expression and its association with SREBP-1 are reduced by treatment with indinavir [69, 70]. However, different processes may govern fat redistribution in different tissues, with gain in visceral fat and loss of subcutaneous fat. In addition, at least one ex vivo study suggests that both markers of adipocyte and osteoblastic differentiation are significantly reduced in human mesenchymal stem cells treated with a subset of protease inhibitors (particularly nelfinavir and saquinavir)  [94], while HIV-1 patients receiving the NRTI zidovudine were shown to have reduced both BMD and whole body fat [33]. Could it be that contributing to both HIV-1/ART-associated bone and lipid disorders is an underlying disregulation of mesenchymal stem cell function combined with separate effects on adult or partially differentiated cells?

4. Conclusion

The importance of PPARγ in both bone and fat metabolism has been clearly demonstrated, and while a role for PPARγ in the lipid abnormalities associated with HIV-1 and its treatment is emerging, its involvement in HIV-1-associated bone disease remains unclear. Given the common origin of both adipocytes and osteoblasts from mesenchymal stem cell, and the demonstrated effect of increased PPARγ expression on bone in vitro and in vivo, we hypothesize a potential role for PPARγ in the reduced bone mass associated with HIV-1 infection and treatment. It may be possible that HIV-1 infection and/or treatment, through dysregulating PPARγ (and possibly also RUNX-2) activity in undifferentiated stromal cells, or in partially differentiated preosteoblast and preadipocyte cells, can reduce the eventual number or functional capacity of the adult cell types.

In order to further investigate this hypothesis, it may be worthwhile to conduct ex vivo experiment on primary mesenchymal stem cells collected from HIV-1 patients. The expression and activity of PPARγ and differentiation potential of these cells could be assessed and compared to those of cells harvested from uninfected individuals, and the data gathered used to generate a new model of HIV-1/PPARγ/mesenchymal stem cell interactions.

It is clear that further studies are necessary to more fully describe the role of PPARγ in the setting of HIV-1-associated bone disease and its interplay with vascular and fat disorders.

References

  1. W. G. Powderly, “Long-term exposure to lifelong therapies,” Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, vol. 29, pp. S28–S40, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  2. N. S. Chew, P. P. Doran, and W. G. Powderly, “Osteopenia and osteoporosis in HIV: pathogenesis and treatment,” Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 318–323, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  3. A. Milinkovic and E. Martinez, “Current perspectives on HIV-associated lipodystrophy syndrome,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 6–9, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  4. K. Fisher, “Wasting and lipodystrophy in patients infected with HIV: a practical approach in clinical practice,” AIDS Reader, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 132–147, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  5. A. Milinković, “HIV-associated lipodystrophy syndrome,” Collegium Antropologicum, vol. 30, pp. 59–62, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  6. P. W. Mallon, J. Miller, D. A. Cooper, and A. Carr, “Prospective evaluation of the effects of antiretroviral therapy on body composition in HIV-1-infected men starting therapy,” AIDS, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 971–979, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. E. D. Rosen and B. M. Spiegelman, “Molecular regulation of adipogenesis,” Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 16, pp. 145–171, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  8. S. Heikkinen, J. Auwerx, and C. A. Argmann, “PPARγ in human and mouse physiology,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1771, no. 8, pp. 999–1013, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  9. P. W. Mallon, P. Unemori, R. Sedwell et al., “In vivo, nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors alter expression of both mitochondrial and lipid metabolism genes in the absence of depletion of mitochondrial DNA,” Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 191, no. 10, pp. 1686–1696, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  10. J. M. Lenhard, E. S. Furfine, R. G. Jain et al., “HIV protease inhibitors block adipogenesis and increase lipolysis in vitro,” Antiviral Research, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 121–129, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. J. M. Gimble, S. Zvonic, Z. E. Floyd, M. Kassem, and M. E. Nuttall, “Playing with bone and fat,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 251–266, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  12. L.-J. Zhao, H. Jiang, C. J. Papasian et al., “Correlation of obesity and osteoporosis: effect of fat mass on the determination of osteoporosis,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 17–29, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  13. X. Shi, M. Hamrick, and C. M. Isales, “Energy balance, myostatin, and GILZ: factors regulating adipocyte differentiation in belly and bone,” PPAR Research, vol. 2007, Article ID 92501, 12 pages, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  14. A. I. Caplan, “Mesenchymal stem cells,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 641–650, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  15. C. A. Gregory, D. J. Prockop, and J. L. Spees, “Non-hematopoietic bone marrow stem cells: molecular control of expansion and differentiation,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 306, no. 2, pp. 330–335, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  16. K. E. S. Poole and J. E. Compston, “Osteoporosis and its management,” British Medical Journal, vol. 333, no. 7581, pp. 1251–1256, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  17. NIH Consensus Development Panel, “Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 285, no. 6, pp. 785–795, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. S. L. Teitelbaum, “Bone resorption by osteoclasts,” Science, vol. 289, no. 5484, pp. 1504–1508, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. S. Serrano, M. L. Mariñoso, J. C. Soriano et al., “Bone remodelling in human immunodeficiency virus-1-infected patients. A histomorphometric study,” Bone, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 185–191, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. N. I. J. Paton, D. C. Macallan, G. E. Griffin, and M. Pazianas, “Bone mineral density in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection,” Calcified Tissue International, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 30–32, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. K. Mondy, W. G. Powderly, S. A. Claxton et al., “Alendronate, vitamin D, and calcium for the treatment of osteopenia/osteoporosis associated with HIV infection,” Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 426–431, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. H. Knobel, A. Guelar, G. Vallecillo, X. Nogués, and A. Díez, “Osteopenia in HIV-infected patients: is it the disease or is it the treatment?,” AIDS, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 807–808, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. A. Lawal, E. S. Engelson, J. Wang, S. B. Heymsfield, and D. P. Kotler, “Equivalent osteopenia in HIV-infected individuals studied before and during the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy,” AIDS, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 278–280, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. J. Teichmann, E. Stephan, U. Lange et al., “Osteopenia in HIV-infected women prior to highly active antiretroviral therapy,” Journal of Infection, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 221–227, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. I. McGowan, A. Cheng, S. Coleman, A. Johnson, and H. Genant, “Assessment of bone mineral density (BMD) in HIV-infected antiretroviral-therapy-naive patients,” in Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, Chicago, Ill, USA, February 2001, abstract no. 628.
  26. J. Hoy, J. Hudson, M. Law, and D. A. Cooper, “Osteopenia in a randomized, multicenter study of protease inhibitor (PI) substitution in patients with the lipodystrophy syndrome and well-controlled HIV viremia,” in Proceedings of the 7th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, San Francisco, Calif, USA, January-February 2000, abstract no. 208.
  27. K. Mondy, K. Yarasheski, W. G. Powderly et al., “Longitudinal evolution of bone mineral density and bone markers in human immunodeficiency virus-infected individuals,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 482–490, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  28. C. Amiel, A. Ostertag, L. Slama et al., “BMD is reduced in HIV-infected men irrespective of treatment,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 402–409, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  29. V. A. Triant, T. T. Brown, H. Lee, and S. K. Grinspoon, “Fracture prevalence among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected versus non-HIV-infected patients in a large U.S. healthcare system,” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 93, no. 9, pp. 3499–3504, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  30. G. Pan, Z. Yang, S. W. Ballinger, and J. M. McDonald, “Pathogenesis of osteopenia/osteoporosis induced by highly active anti-retroviral therapy for AIDS,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1068, pp. 297–308, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  31. P. Tebas, W. G. Powderly, S. Claxton et al., “Accelerated bone mineral loss in HIV-infected patients receiving potent antiretroviral therapy,” AIDS, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. F63–F67, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. A. L. Moore, A. Vashisht, C. A. Sabin et al., “Reduced bone mineral density in HIV-positive individuals,” AIDS, vol. 15, no. 13, pp. 1731–1733, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. A. Carr, J. Miller, J. A. Eisman, and D. A. Cooper, “Osteopenia in HIV-infected men: association with asymptomatic lactic acidemia and lower weight pre-antiretroviral therapy,” AIDS, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 703–709, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. G. Tsekes, G. Chrysos, G. Douskas et al., “Body composition changes in protease inhibitor-naive HIV-infected patients treated with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors,” HIV Medicine, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 85–90, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. T. T. Brown and R. B. Qaqish, “Antiretroviral therapy and the prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis: a meta-analytic review,” AIDS, vol. 20, no. 17, pp. 2165–2174, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  36. M. Yin, J. Dobkin, K. Brudney et al., “Bone mass and mineral metabolism in HIV+ postmenopausal women,” Osteoporosis International, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 1345–1352, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  37. J. E. Gallant, E. Dejesus, J. R. Arribas et al., “Tenofovir DF, emtricitabine, and efavirenz vs. zidovudine, lamivudine, and efavirenz for HIV,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 354, no. 3, pp. 251–260, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  38. J. E. Gallant, S. Staszewski, A. L. Pozniak et al., “Efficacy and safety of tenofovir DF vs stavudine in combination therapy in antiretroviral-naive patients: a 3-year randomized trial,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 292, no. 2, pp. 191–201, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  39. S. E. Dolan, J. R. Kanter, and S. Grinspoon, “Longitudinal analysis of bone density in human immunodeficiency virus-infected women,” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 91, no. 8, pp. 2938–2945, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  40. M. W.-H. Wang, S. Wei, R. Faccio et al., “The HIV protease inhibitor ritonavir blocks osteoclastogenesis and function by impairing RANKL-induced signaling,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 206–213, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. G. T. Allison, M. P. Bostrom, and M. J. Glesby, “Osteonecrosis in HIV disease: epidemiology, etiologies, and clinical management,” AIDS, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. J. C. Keruly, R. E. Chaisson, and R. D. Moore, “Increasing incidence of avascular necrosis of the hip in HIV-infected patients,” Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 101–102, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  43. E. Villamor, “A potential role for vitamin D on HIV infection?,” Nutrition Reviews, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 226–233, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. J. Teichmann, E. Stephan, T. Discher et al., “Changes in calciotropic hormones and biochemical markers of bone metabolism in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection,” Metabolism, vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 1134–1139, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  45. G. Madeddu, A. Spanu, P. Solinas et al., “Bone mass loss and vitamin D metabolism impairment in HIV patients receiving highly active antiretroviral therapy,” Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 39–48, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  46. C. J. P. Van Den Bout-Van Den Beukel, L. Fievez, M. Michels et al., “Vitamin D deficiency among HIV type 1-infected individuals in the Netherlands: effects of antiretroviral therapy,” AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 1375–1382, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  47. C. A. Gregory, D. J. Prockop, and J. L. Spees, “Non-hematopoietic bone marrow stem cells: molecular control of expansion and differentiation,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 306, no. 2, pp. 330–335, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  48. M. E. Nuttall and J. M. Gimble, “Controlling the balance between osteoblastogenesis and adipogenesis and the consequent therapeutic implications,” Current Opinion in Pharmacology, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 290–294, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  49. J. N. Beresford, J. H. Bennett, C. Devlin, P. S. Leboy, and M. E. Owen, “Evidence for an inverse relationship between the differentiation of adipocytic and osteogenic cells in rat marrow stromal cell cultures,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 341–351, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  50. M.-A. Dorheim, M. Sullivan, V. Dandapani et al., “Osteoblastic gene expression during adipogenesis in hematopoietic supporting murine bone marrow stromal cells,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 154, no. 2, pp. 317–328, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  51. S. Verma, J. H. Rajaratnam, J. Denton, J. A. Hoyland, and R. J. Byers, “Adipocytic proportion of bone marrow is inversely related to bone formation in osteoporosis,” Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 55, no. 9, pp. 693–698, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  52. P. Meunier, J. Aaron, C. Edouard, and G. Vignon, “Osteoporosis and the replacement of cell populations of the marrow by adipose tissue. A quantitative study of 84 iliac bone biopsies,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 80, pp. 147–154, 1971. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. J. M. Gimble, C. Morgan, K. Kelly et al., “Bone morphogenetic proteins inhibit adipocyte differentiation by bone marrow stromal cells,” Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 393–402, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  54. M. W. Hamrick, “Invited perspective: leptin and bone—a consensus emerging?,” Bonekey Osteovision, vol. 4, pp. 99–107, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  55. M. W. Hamrick, M. A. Della-Fera, Y.-H. Choi, C. Pennington, D. Hartzell, and C. A. Baile, “Leptin treatment induces loss of bone marrow adipocytes and increases bone formation in leptin-deficient ob/ob mice,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 994–1001, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  56. P. J. Oort, C. H. Warden, T. K. Baumann, T. A. Knotts, and S. H. Adams, “Characterization of Tusc5, an adipocyte gene co-expressed in peripheral neurons,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, vol. 276, no. 1-2, pp. 24–35, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  57. W. Liao, M. T. A. Nguyen, T. Yoshizaki et al., “Suppression of PPAR-γ attenuates insulin-stimulated glucose uptake by affecting both GLUT1 and GLUT4 in 3T3-L1 adipocytes,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 293, no. 1, pp. E219–E227, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  58. L. J. Kelly, P. P. Vicario, G. M. Thompson et al., “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors γ and α mediate in vivo regulation of uncoupling protein (UCP-1, UCP-2, UCP-3) gene expression,” Endocrinology, vol. 139, no. 12, pp. 4920–4927, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  59. P. Ferré, “The biology of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors: relationship with lipid metabolism and insulin sensitivity,” Diabetes, vol. 53, pp. S43–S50, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  60. R. M. Evans, G. D. Barish, and Y.-X. Wang, “PPARs and the complex journey to obesity,” Nature Medicine, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 355–361, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  61. T. Akune, S. Ohba, S. Kamekura et al., “PPARγ insufficiency enhances osteogenesis through osteoblast formation from bone marrow progenitors,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 113, no. 6, pp. 846–855, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  62. S. H. Kim, C. I. Yoo, H. T. Kim, J. Y. Park, C. H. Kwon, and Y. K. Kim, “Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPARγ) induces cell death through MAPK-dependent mechanism in osteoblastic cells,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, vol. 215, no. 2, pp. 198–207, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  63. T.-A. Cock, J. Back, F. Elefteriou et al., “Enhanced bone formation in lipodystrophic PPARγhyp/hyp mice relocates haematopoiesis to the spleen,” EMBO Reports, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 1007–1012, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  64. O. P. Lazarenko, S. O. Rzonca, L. J. Suva, and B. Lecka-Czernik, “Netoglitazone is a PPAR-gamma ligand with selective effects on bone and fat,” Bone, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 74–84, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  65. A. A. Ali, R. S. Weinstein, S. A. Stewart, A. M. Parfitt, S. C. Manolagas, and R. L. Jilka, “Rosiglitazone causes bone loss in mice by suppressing osteoblast differentiation and bone formation,” Endocrinology, vol. 146, no. 3, pp. 1226–1235, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  66. B. Lecka-Czernik, E. J. Moerman, D. F. Grant, J. M. Lehmann, S. C. Manolagas, and R. L. Jilka, “Divergent effects of selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ2 ligands on adipocyte versus osteoblast differentiation,” Endocrinology, vol. 143, no. 6, pp. 2376–2384, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  67. S. O. Rzonca, L. J. Suva, D. Gaddy, D. C. Montague, and B. Lecka-Czernik, “Bone is a target for the antidiabetic compound rosiglitazone,” Endocrinology, vol. 145, no. 1, pp. 401–406, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  68. J.-H. Hong, E. S. Hwang, M. T. McManus et al., “TAZ, a transcriptional modulator of mesenchymal stem cell differentiation,” Science, vol. 309, no. 5737, pp. 1074–1078, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  69. M. Caron, M. Auclair, C. Vigouroux, M. Glorian, C. Forest, and J. Capeau, “The HIV protease inhibitor indinavir impairs sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1 intranuclear localization, inhibits preadipocyte differentiation, and induces insulin resistance,” Diabetes, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 1378–1388, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  70. M. Caron, M. Auclair, H. Sterlingot, M. Kornprobst, and J. Capeau, “Some HIV protease inhibitors alter lamin A/C maturation and stability, SREBP-1 nuclear localization and adipocyte differentiation,” AIDS, vol. 17, no. 17, pp. 2437–2444, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  71. Y. Tamori, J. Masugi, N. Nishino, and M. Kasuga, “Role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ in maintenance of the characteristics of mature 3T3-L1 adipocytes,” Diabetes, vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 2045–2055, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  72. O. Gavrilova, M. Haluzik, K. Matsusue et al., “Liver peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ contributes to hepatic steatosis, triglyceride clearance, and regulation of body fat mass,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 36, pp. 34268–34276, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  73. K. Kannisto, J. Sutinen, E. Korsheninnikova et al., “Expression of adipogenic transcription factors, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma co-activator 1, IL-6 and CD45 in subcutaneous adipose tissue in lipodystrophy associated with highly active antiretroviral therapy,” AIDS, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 1753–1762, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  74. I. Bogacka, H. Xie, G. A. Bray, and S. R. Smith, “The effect of pioglitazone on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ target genes related to lipid storage in vivo,” Diabetes Care, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 1660–1667, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  75. C. Hadigan, S. Yawetz, A. Thomas, F. Havers, P. E. Sax, and S. Grinspoon, “Metabolic effects of rosiglitazone in HIV lipodystrophy: a randomized, controlled trial,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 140, no. 10, pp. 786–794, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  76. A. Carr, C. Workman, D. Carey et al., “No effect of rosiglitazone for treatment of HIV-1 lipoatrophy: randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial,” The Lancet, vol. 363, no. 9407, pp. 429–438, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  77. J. Sutinen, A.-M. Häkkinen, J. Westerbacka et al., “Rosiglitazone in the treatment of HAART-associated lipodystrophy—a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study,” Antiviral Therapy, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 199–207, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  78. D. Kamin, C. Hadigan, M. Lehrke, S. Mazza, M. A. Lazar, and S. Grinspoon, “Resistin levels in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients with lipoatrophy decrease in response to rosiglitazone,” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 90, no. 6, pp. 3423–3426, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  79. J. P. H. van Wijk, E. J. P. de Koning, M. C. Cabezas et al., “Comparison of rosiglitazone and metformin for treating HIV lipodystrophy: a randomized trial,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 143, no. 5, pp. 337–346, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  80. S. Shrivastav, T. Kino, T. Cunningham et al., “Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-1 viral protein R suppresses transcriptional activity of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ and inhibits adipocyte differentiation: implications for HIV-associated lipodystrophy,” Molecular Endocrinology, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 234–247, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  81. W. Paxton, R. I. Connor, and N. R. Landau, “Incorporation of Vpr into human immunodeficiency virus type 1 virions: requirement for the p6 region of gag and mutational analysis,” Journal of Virology, vol. 67, no. 12, pp. 7229–7237, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  82. N. K. Heinzinger, M. I. Bukrinsky, S. A. Haggerty et al., “The Vpr protein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 influences nuclear localization of viral nucleic acids in nondividing host cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 91, no. 15, pp. 7311–7315, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  83. J. He, S. Choe, R. Walker, P. Di Marzio, D. O. Morgan, and N. R. Landau, “Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 viral protein R (Vpr) arrests cells in the G2 phase of the cell cycle by inhibiting p34(cdc2) activity,” Journal of Virology, vol. 69, no. 11, pp. 6705–6711, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  84. E. Jacotot, K. F. Ferri, C. El Hamel et al., “Control of mitochondrial membrane permeabilization by adenine nucleotide translocator interacting with HIV-1 viral protein R and Bcl-2,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 193, no. 4, pp. 509–519, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  85. M. P. Sherman, C. M. C. De Noronha, D. Pearce, and W. C. Greene, “Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Vpr contains two leucine-rich helices that mediate glucocorticoid receptor coactivation independently of its effects on G2 cell cycle arrest,” Journal of Virology, vol. 74, no. 17, pp. 8159–8165, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  86. T. Kino and G. P. Chrousos, “Virus-mediated modulation of the host endocrine signaling systems: clinical implications,” Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 159–166, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  87. M. W.-H. Wang, S. Wei, R. Faccio et al., “The HIV protease inhibitor ritonavir blocks osteoclastogenesis and function by impairing RANKL-induced signaling,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 206–213, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  88. J. M. Fakruddin and J. Laurence, “HIV envelope gp120-mediated regulation of osteoclastogenesis via receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand (RANKL) secretion and its modulation by certain HIV protease inhibitors through interferon-γ/RANKL cross-talk,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 48, pp. 48251–48258, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  89. G. Pan, X. Wu, M. A. McKenna, X. Feng, T. R. Nagy, and J. M. McDonald, “AZT enhances osteoclastogenesis and bone loss,” AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 608–620, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  90. G. Pan, M. Kilby, and J. M. McDonald, “Modulation of osteoclastogenesis induced by nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors,” AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 1131–1141, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  91. A. P. Malizia, E. J. Cotter, N. Chew, W. G. Powderly, and P. P. Doran, “HIV protease inhibitors selectively induce gene expression alterations associated with reduced calcium deposition in primary human osteoblasts,” AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 243–250, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  92. E. J. Cotter, A. P. Malizia, N. Chew, W. G. Powderly, and P. P. Doran, “HIV proteins regulate bone marker secretion and transcription factor activity in cultured human osteoblasts with consequent potential implications for osteoblast function and development,” AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 1521–1530, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  93. E. J. Cotter, H. S. M. Ip, W. G. Powderly, and P. P. Doran, “Mechanism of HIV protein induced modulation of mesenchymal stem cell osteogenic differentiation,” BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, vol. 9, article 33, pp. 1–12, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  94. R. G. Jain and J. M. Lenhard, “Select HIV protease inhibitors alter bone and fat metabolism ex vivo,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 22, pp. 19247–19250, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed