Research Article | Open Access
PPARγ Antagonizes Hypoxia-Induced Activation of Hepatic Stellate Cell through Cross Mediating PI3K/AKT and cGMP/PKG Signaling
Background and Aims. Accumulating evidence reveals that PPARγ plays a unique role in the regulation of hepatic fibrosis and hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) activation. This study was aimed at investigating the role of PPARγ in hypoxia-induced hepatic fibrogenesis and its possible mechanism. Methods. Rats used for CCl4-induced hepatic fibrosis model were exposed to hypoxia for 8 hours each day. Rats exposed to hypoxia were treated with or without the PPARγ agonist rosiglitazone. Liver sections were stained with HE and Sirius red staining 8 weeks later. HSCs were exposed to hypoxic environment in the presence or absence of rosiglitazone, and expression of PPARγ and two fibrosis markers, α-SMA and desmin, were measured using western blot and immunofluorescence staining. Next, levels of PPARγ, α-SMA, and desmin as well as PKG and cGMP activity were detected using PI3K/AKT and a cGMP activator or inhibitor. Results. Hypoxia promoted the induction and progress of hepatic fibrosis and HSCs activation. Meanwhile, rosiglitazone significantly antagonized the effects induced by hypoxia. Signaling by sGC/cGMP/PKG promoted the inhibitory effect of PPARγ on hypoxia-induced activation of HSCs. Moreover, PI3K/AKT signaling or PDE5 blocked the above response of PPARγ. Conclusion. sGC/cGMP/PKG and PI3K/AKT signals act on PPARγ synergistically to attenuate hypoxia-induced HSC activation.
Fibrosis is a common response to hepatic damage, which is characterized by producing and depositing extracellular matrix (ECM) . Excessive fibrosis characterizes a series of liver diseases, such as chronic hepatitis, alcoholism-induced liver damage, and hepatic autoimmune disorders . During this pathological process, hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) are the main executor of fibrogenesis. HSC activation increases the expression and secretion of collagen and other ECM components. It also stimulates hepatic microenvironment cells, such as macrophages, endothelial cells, and inflammatory cells, resulting in the promotion of fibrogenesis in an autocrine or paracrine manner [3, 4]. Therefore, understanding the molecular mechanism based on HSC activation is essential for diagnosis and treatment of hepatic fibrosis.
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)γ is a fundamental nuclear receptor that regulates lipid metabolism, insulin sensitivity, and fat deposition. It plays an extremely important role in liver physiological metabolism . However, increasing researches have implicated that PPARγ is a key mediator in HSC activation and phenotypic alteration, thus maintaining HSCs in a quiescent phase [6, 7]. Recently, oxidative stress is considered to be involved in HSC activation and hepatic fibrogenesis . A large amount of publications has also reported that HSCs exposed to hypoxia could be activated through HIF1α and its downstream target genes or signaling pathways [9–11]. Based on those evidences, we hypothesized that the effect of PPARγ on HSCs is the mechanisms underlying the role of hypoxia in liver fibrogenesis. In fact, PPARγ has been found to be regulated by hypoxia in several diseases. Wang et al. reported that hypoxia decreased UCP2 via HIF-1-mediated suppression of PPARγ, leading to chemoresistance of non-small cell lung cancer . Jiang et al. found that hypoxia inhibited PKG-PPARγ axis in rat distal pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells (PASMCs) and distal pulmonary arteries . However, it is not clear whether these cellular events are associated with the pathogenesis of hepatic fibrosis and its key functionary mechanisms. We therefore performed in vivo and in vitro experiments to test the above hypothesis.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Animals and Experimental Protocol
This study was performed on 35 male SD rats with weight of 200–250 g from Shanghai SLAC Laboratory Animal Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China), housed in regular cages, situated in an animal room at 22 ± 2°C and maintained on a 14-hour light/10-hour dark cycle. The rats were randomly divided into 4 groups as follows: Group I (), serving as controls, were maintained in a standard normoxic chamber (FiO2 0.21). Group II () rats were injected with 40% CCl4 (the mixture of CCl4 and olive oil) in a standard normoxic chamber (FiO2 0.21). Group III () rats were injected with 40% of CCl4 mixture in normobaric hypoxic chamber (FiO2 0.07) with hypoxia exposures 8 hours each day. Group IV () were modeled in the same manner as Group III (40% CCl4 mixture injection plus hypoxia exposures) but treated with PPARγ agonist rosiglitazone (RSG). RSG was added to the liquid diet at a daily intake of 10 mg/kg body wt for feeding.
All rats were sacrificed after 8 weeks, and blood was collected from the abdominal aorta. Serum was separated and stored at −80°C for measurement of hyaluronic acid (HA), laminin (LN), N-terminal peptide of type III procollagen (PIIINP), and collagen type IV (CIV). Then, liver was immediately removed. One part of the liver was used for the extraction of protein for western blotting. The other part of liver was fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, embedded in paraffin, and cut into sections (5 μm thick) for HE and Sirius red staining. Animal care and procedures were approved by Medical Ethics Committee of Jiangsu University, China.
8-Br-cGMP, Rp-8-Br-PET-cGMPS, LY294002, rosiglitazone, and zaprinast were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. 740 Y-P was supplied by R&D systems. LY294002, rosiglitazone, and zaprinast were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (final concentration 0.2%). The other drugs were prepared using distilled water.
2.3. Serum Parameters Examination
Serum levels of HA, LN, PIIINP, and CIV were detected by using ELISA Kits (Elabscience, Wuhan, China) according to the manufacturer’s instruction.
2.4. HE and Sirius Red Staining
Tissue slices were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, embedded with paraffin, and sectioned using standard techniques. Sections were subjected to HE and Sirius red staining. Each sample was assessed independently and scored by two pathologists for a blind evaluation, according to the modified Scheuer fibrosis score system [14, 15]. The fibrosis stage score was categorized into five stages (0–4): 0: none, 1: zone 3 perisinusoidal fibrosis; 2: zone 3 perisinusoidal fibrosis plus portal fibrosis; 3: perisinusoidal fibrosis and portal fibrosis, plus bridging fibrosis; and 4: cirrhosis.
2.5. Cell Culture
Rat HSC-T6 cell line was a gift from Dr. Ke AiWu (Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, China). Cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (Hyclone, USA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone, USA), penicillin (100 IU/ml), and streptomycin (100 IU/ml) (Amresco, USA). Cells were cultured at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2.
2.6. Measurement of Total Cellular cGMP
The supernatant of HSC-T6 cells were collected and stored at −80°C. Total levels of cGMP were measured using a competitive ELISA assay (Cayman Chemical, USA) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations.
2.7. Measurement of PKG Activity
The activity of PKG including PKG-I and PKG-II in each sample was measured according to the protocol of the ELISA kit (CycLex, Japan), in which the phosphorylated antibody can identify the phosphorylation of threonine (Thr 68/119) residues on substrate of PKG.
2.8. Immunofluorescence Staining
Immunofluorescence staining assays were performed as we described previously . Cells were incubated overnight with the primary antibody against α-SMA (ab5694) and desmin (ab15200) (1 : 50 dilution; Abcam, USA) at 4°C. The cells were washed three times with PBS (5 min each) and then incubated in the dark for 1 h at room temperature with Alexa Fluor 488 and 550 conjugated goat anti-rat secondary antibody (1 : 200 dilution; ab150157 and ab150083, Abcam, USA). Nuclei of cells were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). Images were obtained using a Zeiss LSM 510 META Confocal microscope using 20x/0.5 w and 40x/1.2 w objectives.
2.9. Western Blot Analysis
Western blot analysis was performed as described in a previous report from ours . Primary antibodies used in this study are as follows: PPARγ (ab209350) (1 : 1,500), α-SMA (ab5694), desmin (ab15200), AKT (ab8805), Phospho-AKT (ab81283), PI3K p110β (ab151549), PDE5 (ab14672) (1 : 1,000; ABcam, USA), and PI3K p110α (#4249) (1 : 1,200; Cell Signaling Technology, USA). The primary antibody of GAPDH was diluted at 1 : 1,000–1,500 (Santa Cruz, USA). The secondary HRP-conjugated antibodies were diluted at 1 : 2,500. The blots were detected using the ECL system (Beyotime Biotechnology, China). A LI-COR Odyssey scanner (LICOR) was used to analyze the intensity of bands on the blots.
2.10. Statistical Analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 17.0 software. Data are expressed as mean ± SE, and mean values were compared using the Student’s t-test and ANOVA. Data were as mean ± SE. Western blot, ELISA, PKG activity, and cGMP analysis were examined using one-way ANOVA. The and Fisher’s exact test were used to analyze the differences of fibrosis grades in each group. Values of were considered statistically significant.
3.1. Low Expression of PPARγ Is Associated with Hypoxia-Induced Hepatic Fibrosis
Consistent with previous studies, we found that hypoxia can promote the progress of hepatic fibrosis (Tables 1 and 2 and Figure 1). Meanwhile, the PPARγ agonist rosiglitazone (RSG) significantly antagonized hypoxia-induced development of hepatic fibrosis. Hypoxia resulted in a trend towards increasing serum markers (HA, LN, PIIINP, and C IV), but also elevated fibrosis histological grade. However, the activation of PPARγ ameliorated this effect (Tables 1 and 2 and Figure 1). To examine the possible correlation of PPARγ with hepatic fibrosis, the correlation between the expression levels of PPARγ and other two markers of fibrosis, α-SMA and desmin, was measured. As shown in Figures 1(b)-1(c), PPARγ was negatively correlated with α-SMA and desmin expression (r = −0.78613, P < 0.001, and r = −0.83517, P = 0.017, resp.). These results suggest that PPARγ is associated with hypoxia-induced hepatic fibrosis.
as compared with control group. as compared with CCl4 + FiO2 (0.21) group. as compared with CCl4 + FiO2 (0.07) group.
as compared with control group. and as compared with CCl4 + FiO2 (0.21) group. as compared with CCl4 + FiO2 (0.07) group.
3.2. PPARγ Antagonizes HSCs Activation Caused by Hypoxic Stress
It is well known that HSCs are important effectors inducing hepatic fibrosis. Previously, we demonstrated that hypoxia promoted hepatic fibrogenesis through the regulation of PPARγ in vitro. To clarify if HSC is a modulator of this process, HSC was exposed to hypoxic stress with oxygen concentration decreased from 21% to 7% at different time. In comparison to control groups, PPARγ protein level was significantly decreased in a time-dependent manner, accompanied by an obvious increased expression in two markers of fibrosis, α-SMA and desmin (Figure 2(a)). At the same time, based on our observation, the trend reached plateau after 6 hours of hypoxia exposure. These results demonstrated that the early phase of hypoxic stress might cause HSCs activation.
Then, the expression of α-SMA and desmin were analyzed in HSCs exposed to hypoxia in the presence or absence of the PPARγ agonist, rosiglitazone (RSG, 50 nM), by western blotting and immunofluorescence. As expected, hypoxia exposure to HSCs alone led to significant PPARγ downregulation and α-SMA and desmin rise, whereas cotreatment with hypoxia and RSG reversed these effects (Figure 2(b)), indicating that PPARγ antagonizes HSCs activation caused by hypoxic stress.
3.3. PI3K/AKT Signals Involved in Hypoxia-Induced PPARγ Low Expression
The PI3K/AKT signaling pathway is an essential mechanism by which cells regulate oxidative stress effect and induces HSC activation and proliferation dependent on HIF-1α in response to hypoxia. Here, we analyzed whether PI3K/AKT signaling is associated with PPARγ inhibition of hypoxia-induced HSCs activation. Results showed that hypoxia-induced HSCs activation when AKT phosphorylation was significantly enhanced (Figure 3(c)). Inhibition of PI3K with LY294002 (20 μM) distinctly opposed the above-mentioned activation. Simultaneously, PPARγ expression was also recovered (Figures 3(c) and 3(d)). Similarly, activation of PI3K with 740 Y-P (25 μg/ml) of HSCs exposed to hypoxia in the presence of RSG (50 nM) significantly reduced PPARγ expression, along with increased level of α-SMA and desmin (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)). These results imply that PI3K/AKT signaling blocked the inhibitory effect of PPARγ on hypoxia-induced activation of HSCs.
3.4. The Cross Talk of sGC/cGMP/PKG and PI3K/AKT Signaling Adjusts PPARγ Attenuating Hypoxia-Induced HSC Activation
According to previous studies, sGC/cGMP/PKG contributes to the treatment of cirrhosis. In addition, this signal also modulates various cellular events induced by hypoxic stress. To investigate the potential role of sGC/cGMP/PKG signaling in HSC hypoxia responses modulated by PPAR and PI3K/AKT signaling, HSCs were incubated for 90 min under hypoxia with or without 8-Br-cGMP (1 mM) which was widely used as sGC/cGMP/PKG agonist and in the presence or absence of Rp-8-Br-cGMP (20 μM), a sGC/cGMP/PKG antagonist. We found that cotreated 8-Br-cGMP with hypoxia showed a significant decrease in protein levels of PI3K p110α, PI3K p110β, and phosphorylated AKT in comparison with the hypoxia group. In consequence of this decline, PPARγ expression increased. Moreover, just as we speculated, α-SMA and desmin level also reduced. The effect induced by 8-Br-cGMP was blocked by the inclusion of Rp-8-Br-cGMP (Figure 4(a)). These results indicated that sGC/cGMP/PKG directly inhibited PI3K/AKT signaling and on the other hand increased PPARγ, eventually affecting the hypoxia-induced HSCs activation.
To further confirm the above findings, we used zaprinast, a specific inhibitor of phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5), to inhibit cGMP hydrolysis and to observe the subsequent effects on PPARγ and PI3K/AKT signaling on hypoxia-induced HSC activation. Results showed that the hypoxic environment significantly improved the cGMP and PKG activity in HSCs (Figures 4(c)-4(d)). PDE5 inhibition restored cGMP and PKG activity (Figures 4(c)-4(d)), followed by increased PPARγ expression and repressed HSCs activation (decreased expression of α-SMA and desmin) (Figure 4(b)). These data suggested that sGC/cGMP/PKG and PI3K/AKT signals synergistically act on PPARγ, and the latter inhibited hypoxia-induced HSC activation.
PPARγ, as a transcription factor, controls gene transcription and cell differentiation both in vitro and in vivo and plays a key role in inhibiting HSC activation and maintaining the morphological and biochemical reversal of activated HSC to quiescent cells [17–19]. Current evidences have shown that hypoxia is a common stimulus to the development of hepatic fibrosis and HSCs activation [20, 21]. In fact, hypoxia is capable of connecting a variety of signals. It not only affects the activation of HSCs but also acts on a variety of other cells, such as sinusoidal cells, hepatocytes, adipocytes, and liver-resident macrophages (Kuppfer cells) [1, 22–24]. Secondly, hypoxia-induced structural changes in hepatic fibrosis aggravate the hypoxic environment, thus, in turn, accelerating its pathologic progression of hepatic fibrosis.
However, little is known regarding the effect of PPARγ on HSC activation and hepatic fibrosis under hypoxia stress. To elucidate the interrelationship and molecular mechanism between HSCs activation and PPARγ in hypoxic environment, we designed experiments both in vitro and in vivo. For this purpose, by exposing CCl4 modeling rats to hypoxic environment, we validated the hypothesis that hypoxic stress promoted hepatic fibrosis. Notably, expression of PPARγ was inhibited by hypoxia. Moreover, expression of two markers of fibrosis, α-SMA and desmin, significantly increased. To further explore the effects of PPARγ in hypoxia, RSG, a PPARγ agonist, was added to hypoxia exposed groups. As expected, hepatic fibrosis induced by hypoxia was ameliorated with increasing PPARγ level. These results were also confirmed by HSC experiments in vivo. Our findings confirmed that PPARγ antagonizes hepatic fibrosis caused by hypoxia stress through inhibiting HSCs activation.
However, the underlying mechanism that PPARγ mediated hypoxia-induced HSC activation must be further explored. Recent studies displayed that AKT signaling and PPARγ have a mutual inhibitory effect [25–27], but this theory is still controversial. Kilter et al. suggested that PPARγ facilitates AKT phosphorylation in cardiomyocytes during hypoxia/reoxygenation . However, another independent study found that PPARγ inhibits endothelial cell migration by inhibiting PI3K/AKT signaling . Our present study showed that PI3K/AKT signaling blocked the inhibitory effect of PPARγ on hypoxia-induced HSCs activation. Next, cGMP analogs and antagonists were used, and results showed that sGC/cGMP/PKG directly inhibited PI3K/AKT signaling and increased PPARγ expression, eventually affecting the hypoxia-induced HSCs activation. In contrast, inhibition of PDE5 and resisting cGMP hydrolysis restore cGMP and PKG activity, followed by increased PPARγ expression and repressed HSCs activation.
Given the synergistic effect of hypoxia and insulin resistance in liver fibrosis, previous study showed that hypoxia leads to a decrease in PPARγ expression, followed by inhibition of IR transcription, resulting in the blockade of IGF-1 and subsequent signals. When TZD restores PPARγ, IR activation occurs directly and indirectly, initiating IGF-1/PI3K signaling . However, we found that the hypoxic environment induced the PI3K signals, leading to the decrease of PPARγ expression, indicating that there is a complex negative feedback mechanism in this process.
Based on these data, we speculated that sGC/cGMP function on PKG activation to activate PPARγ, which attenuates hypoxia-induced HSCs activation and hepatic fibrogenesis. On the other side, hypoxia directly and indirectly inhibits the expression of PPAR, by inducing PI3K/AKT signaling or activating PDE5 to cGMP hydrolysis, which is ultimately beneficial to hypoxia-induced HSCs activation. Our findings may provide new insights into the mechanisms leading to fibrosis in the liver. It would be interesting to establish whether the same signals are operative in tissues in which both hypoxia and PPARγ are present, like in adipose tissue in obesity [31, 32]. New studies are necessary to address the potential of new therapeutic tools able to counteract the pathophysiological processes leading to fibrosis.
Qinghui Zhang and Shihao Xiang are co-first authors.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors have declared that no conflicts of interest exist.
Qinghui Zhang conceived and designed the experiments; Qinghui Zhang and Shihao Xiang performed the experiments; Qingqian Liu and Tao Gu analyzed the data; Yongliang Yao contributed the reagents and materials; Qinghui Zhang wrote the manuscript; Xiaojie Lu supported supplement tests in the revised manuscript and provided a language service for the revised manuscript. Qinghui Zhang and Shihao Xiang are equal contributors.
This work was supported by Shanghai Science and Technology Commission Foundation (Grant no. 16411972700).
- E. Seki and R. F. Schwabe, “Hepatic inflammation and fibrosis: functional links and key pathways,” Hepatology, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 1066–1079, 2015.
- R. Bataller and D. A. Brenner, “Liver fibrosis,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 115, no. 2, pp. 209–218, 2005.
- E. Seki and D. A. Brenner, “Recent advancement of molecular mechanisms of liver fibrosis,” Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 512–518, 2015.
- R. Weiskirchen and F. Tacke, “Liver fibrosis: from pathogenesis to novel therapies,” Digestive Diseases, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 410–422, 2016.
- Y. Jia, C. Wu, J. Kim, B. Kim, and S.-J. Lee, “Astaxanthin reduces hepatic lipid accumulations in high-fat-fed C57BL/6J mice via activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) alpha and inhibition of PPAR gamma and Akt,” The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, vol. 28, pp. 9–18, 2016.
- D. Zhou, J. Wang, L. N. He et al., “Prolyl oligopeptidase attenuates hepatic stellate cell activation through induction of Smad7 and PPAR-γ,” Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 780–786, 2017.
- H. Jin, N. Lian, F. Zhang et al., “Activation of PPARγ/P53 signaling is required for curcumin to induce hepatic stellate cell senescence,” Cell Death & Disease, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. e2189–e2189, 2016.
- Z. Liu, W. Dou, Y. Zheng et al., “Curcumin upregulates Nrf2 nuclear translocation and protects rat hepatic stellate cells against oxidative stress,” Molecular Medicine Reports, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1717–1724, 2016.
- Y. Wang, Y. Huang, F. Guan et al., “Hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha and mapk co-regulate activation of hepatic stellate cells upon hypoxia stimulation,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 9, Article ID e74051, 2013.
- B. L. Copple, S. Bai, L. D. Burgoon, and J.-O. Moon, “Hypoxia-inducible factor-1α regulates the expression of genes in hypoxic hepatic stellate cells important for collagen deposition and angiogenesis,” Liver International, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 230–244, 2011.
- L. Zhan, C. Huang, X.-M. Meng et al., “Hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha in hepatic fibrosis: a promising therapeutic target,” Biochimie, vol. 108, pp. 1–7, 2015.
- M. Wang, G. Li, Z. Yang et al., “Uncoupling protein 2 downregulation by hypoxia through repression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ promotes chemoresistance of non-small cell lung cancer,” Oncotarget, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 8083–8094, 2017.
- Q. Jiang, W. Lu, K. Yang et al., “Sodium tanshinone IIA sulfonate inhibits hypoxia-induced enhancement of SOCE in pulmonary arterial smooth muscle cells via the PKG-PPAR-γ signaling axis,” American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology, vol. 311, no. 1, pp. C136–C149, 2016.
- E. M. Brunt, “Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: definition and pathology,” Seminars in Liver Disease, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 3–16, 2001.
- D. E. Kleiner, E. M. Brunt, M. van Natta et al., “Design and validation of a histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease,” Hepatology, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1313–1321, 2005.
- Q.-H. Zhang, Y.-L. Yao, X.-Y. Wu et al., “Anti-miR-362-3p inhibits migration and invasion of human gastric cancer cells by its target CD82,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 60, no. 7, pp. 1967–1976, 2015.
- W. Guan, F. Cheng, H. Wu et al., “GATA binding protein 3 is correlated with leptin regulation of PPARγ1 in hepatic stellate cells,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 568–578, 2017.
- F. Zhang, D. Kong, Y. Lu, and S. Zheng, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ as a therapeutic target for hepatic fibrosis: from bench to bedside,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 259–276, 2013.
- Y. Ogawa, M. Yoneda, W. Tomeno, K. Imajo, and Y. Shinohara, “Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma exacerbates concanavalin a-induced liver injury via suppressing the translocation of NF-κB into the nucleus,” PPAR Research, vol. 2012, Article ID 940384, 5 pages, 2012.
- S. C. Iyer, A. Kannan, A. Gopal, N. Devaraj, and D. Halagowder, “Receptor channel TRPC6 orchestrate the activation of human hepatic stellate cell under hypoxia condition,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 336, no. 1, pp. 66–75, 2015.
- Y. Jin, Y. Bai, H. Ni et al., “Activation of autophagy through calcium-dependent AMPK/mTOR and PKCθ pathway causes activation of rat hepatic stellate cells under hypoxic stress,” FEBS Letters, vol. 590, no. 5, pp. 672–682, 2016.
- S. Mueller, “Does pressure cause liver cirrhosis? the sinusoidal pressure hypothesis,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 22, no. 48, pp. 10482–10501, 2016.
- E. Ceni, T. Mello, S. Polvani et al., “The orphan nuclear receptor COUP-TFII coordinates hypoxia-independent proangiogenic responses in hepatic stellate cells,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 754–764, 2017.
- L. M. Risør, M. Fenger, N. V. Olsen, and S. Møller, “Hepatic erythropoietin response in cirrhosis,” Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation, vol. 76, no. 3, pp. 234–239, 2016.
- Y. Lecarpentier, V. Claes, A. Vallée, and J. Hébert, “Thermodynamics in cancers: opposing interactions between PPAR gamma and the canonical WNT/beta-catenin pathway,” linical and Translational Medicine, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 14, 2017.
- Z. Ge, P. Zhang, T. Hong et al., “Erythropoietin alleviates hepatic insulin resistance via PPARγ-dependent AKT activation,” Scientific Reports, vol. 5, Article ID 17878, 2015.
- A. M. E. Zuckermann, R. M. La Ragione, D. L. Baines, and R. S. B. Williams, “Valproic acid protects against haemorrhagic shock-induced signalling changes via PPARγ activation in an in vitro model,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 172, no. 22, pp. 5306–5317, 2015.
- H. Kilter, M. Werner, C. Roggia et al., “The PPAR-γ agonist rosiglitazone facilitates Akt rephosphorylation and inhibits apoptosis in cardiomyocytes during hypoxia/reoxygenation,” Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 1060–1067, 2009.
- S. Goetze, F. Eilers, A. Bungenstock et al., “PPAR activators inhibit endothelial cell migration by targeting Akt,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 293, no. 5, pp. 1431–1437, 2002.
- V. Costa, D. Foti, F. Paonessa et al., “The insulin receptor: A new anticancer target for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPARγ) and thiazolidinedione- PPARγ agonists,” Endocrine-Related Cancer, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 325–335, 2008.
- P. Trayhurn, “Hypoxia and adipose tissue function and dysfunction in obesity,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 2013.
- M. Greco, E. Chiefari, T. Montalcini et al., “Early effects of a hypocaloric, mediterranean diet on laboratory parameters in obese individuals,” Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 2014, Article ID 750860, 8 pages, 2014.
Copyright © 2018 Qinghui Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.