Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Pain Research and Management
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 7941238, 6 pages
Research Article

Pain Experience and Behavior Management in Pediatric Dentistry: A Comparison between Traditional Local Anesthesia and the Wand Computerized Delivery System

1Unit of Dentistry, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
2Clinique Saint Nicolas, 55 allée Charles de Fitte, 31300 Toulouse, France
3Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive and Oral Sciences, Section of Pediatric Dentistry, University of Naples, Federico II, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
4Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Via Caserta 6, 00196 Rome, Italy

Correspondence should be addressed to Angela Galeotti

Received 3 November 2016; Revised 27 December 2016; Accepted 23 January 2017; Published 15 February 2017

Academic Editor: Alessandro Villa

Copyright © 2017 Annelyse Garret-Bernardin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Aim. To evaluate the pain experience and behavior during dental injection, using the Wand computerized delivery system versus conventional local anesthesia in children and adolescents. Methods. An observational crossover split mouth study was performed on 67 patients (aged 7 to 15 years), requiring local anesthesia for dental treatments in both sides of the dental arch. Patients received both types of injections in two separate appointments, one with the use of a Computer Delivery System (the Wand STA system) and one with the traditional syringe. The following data were recorded: pain rating; changes in heart rate; level of collaboration; patient satisfaction. The data were analyzed using ANOVA for quantitative outcomes and nonparametric analysis (Kruskal–Wallis) for qualitative parameters. Results. The use of the Wand system determined significantly lower pain ratings and lower increase of heart rate than the traditional syringe. During injection, the number of patients showing a relaxed behavior was higher with the Wand than with the traditional local anesthesia. The patient level of satisfaction was higher with the Wand compared to the conventional local anesthesia. Conclusions. The Wand system may provide a less painful injection when compared to the conventional local anesthesia and it seemed to be better tolerated with respect to a traditional syringe.