Pain Research and Management

Pain Research and Management / 2021 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 |Article ID 6660304 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6660304

Bao Wu, Chang-Cheng Chen, Juan Wang, Xue-Qiang Wang, "Incidence and Risk Factors of Low Back Pain in Marathon Runners", Pain Research and Management, vol. 2021, Article ID 6660304, 7 pages, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6660304

Incidence and Risk Factors of Low Back Pain in Marathon Runners

Academic Editor: Li Hu
Received26 Dec 2020
Revised27 Jan 2021
Accepted11 Feb 2021
Published22 Feb 2021

Abstract

Purpose. The occurrence of low back pain (LBP) in marathon runners has been poorly understood. This study aimed to describe the risk factors and identify whether these factors can cause LBP in these athletes. Methods. A self-developed questionnaire was randomly distributed to 850 runners of running a half or a full marathon. Participants responded with the questionnaire focusing on previous training and running conditions after their competitions. Results. On the basis of the remaining 800 valid questionnaires, the incidence of LBP was 4.50% (n = 36). A total of 572 (71.5%) males and 228 (28.5%) females, with an average age range of 33.9 ± 9.0 years, came from different occupations with different physical activity characteristics. However, no significant associations between occupation and runners with LBP () were found. In the final models, risk factors, including warm-up activities (, OR = 2.617), fatigue (p = 0.008, OR = 2.680), running gait posture (, OR = 2.273), and environmental temperature (, OR = 6.584), were significantly associated with LBP in marathoners. Conclusion. Although LBP was uncommon in marathoners, it was linked to the factors such as insufficient warm-up activities, fatigue, poor running gait posture, and uncomfortable environmental temperature. Future studies need to validate these results. Nevertheless, these findings could still be useful for protecting the lower back area of runners clinically.

1. Introduction

Marathon running has become an increasingly popular sport in the world in recent years [1]. However, numerous studies have reported the incidence of injuries in long-distance runners during training or competition [2]. To date, the probability of injuries in long-distance athletes is approximately 18.2%–92.4% [3, 4]. In addition, the prevalence of low back pain (LBP) in athletes is 1%–30%, and 10%–15% of all sport injuries were LBP [5, 6]. In marathon runners, previous studies have reported that the incidence rates of LBP were between 4.8% and 10.3% [4, 7, 8]. Many intrinsic and extrinsic risk factors may lead to injuries in athletes, especially in marathon runners [5, 911]. Previous studies have reported that intrinsic factors, such as body mass index, body fat percentage, and the circumference of the upper arm, were greatly likely to induce temporary or long-lasting injuries or pain on participants [1215]. However, no consensus exists on whether age and gender have an effect on injuries [16]. In addition to intrinsic factors, many extrinsic factors (running experience, stretching before exercise, previous injuries, psychological factors, etc.) have been found to induce injuries in long-distance running [1621].

Although risk factors for running injuries have been discussed extensively in many studies, little literature has documented the specific risk factors of LBP in marathon runners. At present, we only know that the LBP in most athletes is a self-limiting sprain or strain, which gradually develops into a persistent chronic or recurrent symptom and often results in degenerative lumbar disc diseases or spondylotic pressure injuries eventually [5, 2225]. However, fewer articles have systematically studied what risk factors cause self-limited sprains or strain. In Kasunich’s study, lack of muscle strength and inadequate warm-up exercises were considered as the causes of LBP in runners [20]. Malisoux reported that the relationship between the parallel use of different running shoes and running-related injuries in marathon runners with LBP may be positively correlated [8]. Videbaek and Kluitenberg stated that the risk of injuries may be related to the time spent on running in full or half marathon [9, 10].

To prevent LBP in runners, this study aimed to outline the characteristics of risk factors describing LBP in marathon runners, as well as identify whether these factors were related to back pain and injury during a marathon.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

Participants in the 2016 Shanghai International Marathon were invited to answer a self-designed questionnaire. A total of 850 participants running for the full (42.2 km) or half (21.1 km) marathon returned the questionnaire during this event. To decrease bias associated with an unknown magnitude of runners, the inclusion criteria comprised the following: (1) amateur or professional marathoners, (2) ≥18 years old, and (3) runners who can understand the questionnaire. The data with missing basic information or those with incomplete answers were excluded.

2.2. Data Collection

Information about LBP and injuries and their related factors obtained from the runners’ answers (the remaining 800 valid questionnaires) were collected through a self-developed questionnaire. This questionnaire consisted of basic personal information (such as age, gender, and occupational physical activity characteristics) and contents about risk factors associated with LBP in marathoners. According to our previous study, we confirmed the structural validity (KOM = 0.66) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.82) of the questionnaire. Through the questionnaire, we found that the occupations of the participants included managers, business and financial operators, computer programmers, etc. This was not only because of their occupational physical activity characteristics but also because they considered their physical activity to be sedentary. Meanwhile, some participants from professions, such as healthcare instructors, waiters, indoor installation, and maintenance personnel, were self-identified their physical activity as indoor activities. In addition, some professional marathon runners and sports enthusiasts indicated that their physical activities were outdoor activities. There were some student groups and some unidentifiable physical activity occupations in this survey. Therefore, the marathon runners with different occupational physical activity characteristics were simply divided into five groups, namely, sedentary, indoor activity, outdoor activity, student, and other groups. The questionnaire showed the possible factors that may induce LBP in marathoners, including running groups, foot strike patterns, warm-up activities, strength, fatigue, shoe types, running gait posture, previous injuries, temperature factor, site environment, psychological reasons, and other factors. Participants either chose or wrote records in the questionnaire that match their own situation at that condition. Detailed contents are as follows: (1) running groups: full or half marathon; (2) foot strike patterns: forefoot strike (mainly), rear heel strike (mainly), forefoot strike (only), full foot strike, and not clear; (3) warm-up activities: enough or not enough; (4) strength: enough or not enough; (5) fatigue: yes or no; (6) shoe types: slow shaking, controlling, stabilising, sprinting, or not clear; (7) running gait posture: good or bad; (8) previous injuries: yes or no; (9) temperature: comfortable or uncomfortable; (10) site environment: adapted or unadapted; (11) psychology: affected or unaffected; (12) other aspects: yes or no. All questions were responded sequentially and effectively by the runners, and the staff provided an explanation of the question. Especially in terms of running gait posture, we described a good running gait posture as one that holds up its head and looks straight ahead, keeps arm and shoulder swinging naturally, and tries to avoid the distance of per step too wide or too narrow; and the body is moving in the right direction. Given that the marathon runners participating in the survey included amateur athletes and professional marathoners, the content of the risk factors designed in the questionnaire was not only related to professional marathon runners.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

The characteristics of the participants were summarised using descriptive statistics (mean ± SD or percentage). In addition, chi-square statistics was used to detect associations between the presence of LBP and participants’ characteristics. Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to detect the associations between the presence of LBP and its risk factors (12 factors) in runners () separately. Then, we put the factors which were significant in univariate logistic regression analysis into a stepwise multivariate logistic regression model to determine whether these factors were ultimately associated with the presence of LBP. The independent variables used in the analysis were the risk factors, and the dependent variable was the presence of LBP. Statistical analysis of all results was performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences software version 22.0.

3. Results

3.1. Participants

Fifty marathon runners missed basic information or had not completed the questions fully, which were then excluded. Hence, 800 questionnaires proceeded to data analysis. The participants were 572 (71.5%) males and 228 (28.5%) females with average age of 33.9 ± 9.0 years. We found age and gender had no significant correlation with LBP (all ). In total, approximately 4.50% of all the participants suffered LBP. Table 1 shows the different occupational physical activity characteristics of age-grouped runners in the marathon. Runners between the ages of 31 and 40 had the highest rate of LBP (2.25%) in all populations. The incidence of LBP in sedentary group was the highest among all population, which accounted for 47.22% of all LBP runners.


Age groups (%)ConditionsSedentary groupsIndoor activity groupsOutdoor activity groupsStudent groupsOther groupsTotalIncidence (LBP) (%)
NumberNumberNumberNumberNumberNumber

18–20Non-LBP63580220.125
LBP000101
Total6359023

21–30Non-LBP163255529152871.75
LBP5161114
Total16826613016301

31–40Non-LBP20415590212992.25
LBP10340118
Total2141863022317

41–50Non-LBP697221181170.25
LBP101002
Total70723118119

51–60Non-LBP221405320.125
LBP100001
Total23140533

≥61Non-LBP0230270
LBP000000
Total023027

Total (LBP)1741122364.50

Non-LBP: non-low back pain; LBP: low back pain.
3.2. Risk Analysis
3.2.1. Univariate Analysis

The univariate logistic regression analysis involved the identification of twelve factors associated with LBP. Table 2 indicates that six risk factors were significantly related to LBP, particularly the running group of full or half marathon (), warm-up activities (), strength (), fatigue (), running gait posture (), and environmental temperature (). Conversely, foot strike patterns, shoe types, previous injury effect, site environment, psychological reasons, and other factors were unrelated to LBP.


Risk factorsNon-LBP N = 764LBP (%) N = 36Total (%) N = 800 value
Number (%)Number (%)Number (%)

Running groups
Full marathon314 (41.1)21 (58.3)335 (41.9)0.044
Half marathon450 (58.9)15 (41.7)465 (58.1)

Foot strike patterns
Forefoot (main)396 (51.8)21 (58.3)417 (52.2)0.139
Rear heel (main)268 (35.1)13 (36.1)281 (35.1)
Forefoot (only)15 (2.0)1 (2.8)16 (2.0)
Full foot41 (5.4)0 (0)41 (5.1)
Not clear44 (5.7)1 (2.8)45 (5.6)

Warm-up activities
Enough648 (84.8)21 (58.3)669 (83.6)<0.001
Not enough116 (15.2)15 (41.7)131 (16.4)

Strength
Enough636 (83.2)23 (63.9)659 (82.4)0.004
Not enough128 (16.8)13 (36.1)141 (17.6)

Fatigue
Yes123 (16.1)15 (41.7)138 (17.3)<0.001
No641 (83.9)21 (58.3)662 (82.7)

Shoe types
Slow shaking365 (47.8)17 (47.2)382 (47.8)0.664
Controlling64 (8.4)4 (11.1)68 (8.5)
Stabilising217 (28.4)12 (33.3)229 (28.6)
Sprinting24 (3.1)1 (2.8)25 (3.1)
Not clear94 (12.3)2 (5.6)96 (12.0)

Running gait posture
Good669 (87.6)25 (69.4)694 (86.7)0.003
Bad95 (12.4)11 (30.6)106 (13.3)

Previous injuries
Yes49 (6.4)3 (8.3)52 (6.5)0.649
No715 (93.6)33 (91.7)748 (93.5)

Temperature
Comfortable758 (99.2)33 (91.7)791 (98.9)0.001
Uncomfortable6 (0.8)3 (8.3)9 (1.1)

Site environment
Adapted748 (97.9)34 (94.4)782 (97.7)0.189
Unadapted16 (2.1)2 (5.6)18 (2.3)

Psychology
Affected7 (0.9)1 (2.8)8 (1.0)0.298
Unaffected757 (99.1)35 (97.2)792 (99.0)

Other aspects
Yes30 (3.9)1 (2.8)31 (3.8)0.728
No734 (96.1)35 (97.2)769 (96.2)

Non-LBP: non-low back pain; LBP: low back pain. .
3.2.2. Multivariate regression Analysis

Six univariately associated factors () of LBP were utilised in the multivariate logistic regression analysis to develop a risk model. Table 3 shows that, in the multivariate regression analysis model, warm-up activities (OR = 2.617, 95% CI = 1.237–5.537, ), fatigue (OR = 2.680, 95% CI = 1.292–5.557, ), running gait posture (OR = 2.273, 95% CI = 1.034–4.995, ), and environmental temperature (OR = 6.584, 95% CI = 1.346–32.216, ) were significantly related to LBP in marathoners.


Risk factorsOR95% CI value

Warm-up activities:2.6171.237–5.5370.012
Enough vs. not enough

Fatigue:2.6801.292–5.5570.008
Yes vs. no

Running gait posture:2.2731.034–4.9950.041
Good vs. bad

Temperature6.5841.346–32.2160.020
Comfortable vs. uncomfortable

Non-LBP: non-low back pain; LBP: low back pain. .

4. Discussion

This study assessed the incidence of LBP and estimated the specific risk factors for LBP in marathon runners. The incidence rate was 4.50%, which was slightly lower than the average incidence reported in previous studies [4, 7, 8]. The study also identified that sufficient warm-up activities, no fatigue, good running gait posture, and comfortable environmental temperature are significantly meaningful for the prevention of LBP in marathon runners.

In our study, although a large number of participants were amateur athletes, participants’ age and gender were not related to LBP. These results were consistent with other literature [4, 26]. Commonly, occupations are significantly relevant to the incidence of LBP because of the characteristics of occupational physical activities [27, 28]. Occupational physical activities determine the strategies and characteristics of human body use. For example, it is inevitable for long-term sedentary workers to have to flex or bend over for long periods of time. That aggravates the load around the spine, especially the low back, which easily causes the occurrence of LBP. In our research, the occurrence of LBP in the sedentary group was on the top among all the groups that needed to be vigilant.

Warming up prior to exercise or competition is crucial for the attainment of optimum performance [29]. This study found that insufficient warm-up activity was associated with LBP, which was consistent with previous literature reporting that insufficient warm-up activity could cause musculoskeletal injury [26]. The mechanism is that warm-up prior to competition can activate the lower back muscles in advance, promote the stability of the lower back core, and reduce the occurrence of LBP [30]. Consequently, the chance of experiencing passive or active sprain or strain would be reduced. In addition, warm-up activities evoke physiological- and psychological-related effects on the body, thereby greatly enhancing the preparedness for the subsequent task [3134]. This preparation also reduces the risk of injuries in some way. However, warm-up activities can also bring the negative effect of performance, which may induce fatigue by excessive tension and lack of adequate recovery before a competition [35, 36]. Therefore, warm-up activities should be appropriately balanced before training or competition.

Fatigue is inevitable in all athletes and is an essential aspect when exploring the full-performance capabilities of runners [37]. In our study, we found fatigue was one of the risk factors that was associated with LBP in marathon runners. The mechanism is that excessive use of the body function and heavily repetitive physical work on the waist region when running can aggravate the waist load, leading to provoking LBP [38, 39]. Especially when runners were tired, they tended to lose control of their bodies, especially their waist movements. At that condition, runners cannot be able to take advantage of the redundancy of the musculoskeletal system to adapt to their movement strategies, thereby accumulating injury tissues [40]. Meanwhile, fatigue leads to an imbalance of immune suppression, impaired reproductive function, and changes in physical self-perception of the body [41]. All these effects will lead to an abnormal endogenous body regulation that may cause the occurrence of LBP indirectly. Commonly, amateur marathon runners without adequate professional training or exercise were most likely to feel tired and became a high risk of population with LBP [40, 42, 43], because runners lost control of lumbar movement and decreased the structured lumbar movement variability after the fatigue, which was associated with increased LBP.

Distance running performance needs running gait posture to collaborate, including stride parameters, lower limb angles, vertical displacement of the body, changes in horizontal velocity during ground contact, and trunk and pelvis orientation [1, 44]. In our research, we found bad running gait posture was related to LBP in marathon runners. The mechanism is that improper running gait posture can cause changes in back-surrounding muscles, spine, and pelvis biomechanics. Abnormal biomechanics changes naturally cause the lower back injuries [44]. However, considering that running is a relatively independent movement with multiple degrees of freedom, individual runners perform forward locomotion by using multifarious strategies with evidence for large interindividual shifts in stride patterns and lower limb kinematics [45, 46]. Therefore, further research is needed in the future to confirm the extent to which running gait posture affects LBP with different exercise strategies.

In our study, we found comfortable environmental temperature was associated with the reduction of the occurrence of lower back injuries. Previous studies have reported that changes in ambient temperature on the performance of exercise could affect the central system to regulate our body to adapt to the environment [47]. We also knew ambient temperature could cause changes in the cardiovascular blood supply to the working muscles [48]. Therefore, the uncomfortable ambient temperature when running marathon affected the normal state of the lower back through a combination of the nervous and cardiovascular system, which may be the mechanism of LBP. However, the result needs to be confirmed in the future with additional experiments to be conducted. Nonetheless, strategies to prevent LBP for marathoners should consider appropriate competition for the race based on environmental temperature [49, 50]. Athletes should acclimate to the running environment, especially the temperature if possible.

When analyzing other factors, this study did not find that the shoe factor was a risk factor of LBP occurrence. Although studies have reported that previous injuries might be the cause of injuries, previous injuries were not a significant factor in this survey. Furthermore, different running groups had nothing to do with the occurrence of LBP in marathon runners. However, the results of the present study should still be carefully considered.

The limitation of this study was the limited sample size of the LBP in the half or full marathon runners. Only 36 runners of the total 800 responders reported their back pain compared with the remaining 764 participants with low back health. This result indicates the need to increase the data to supplement analyses related to LBP in marathon runners and analyze whether the risk factors about back pain are trustworthy with large sample experiments. Another limitation was the content of the design associated with the occurrence of LBP displayed in the questionnaire. Not all aspects of types of lower back injuries and pain in marathon, such as LBP-related pelvic movement and pain symptoms, were included. Also, the frequency of training per day or total training time in male and female marathon runners and three general types of LBP by causes (mechanical back pain, nonmechanical back pain, and referred pain from internal organs) were not fully considered. And the lost characteristics of BMI were not included in the analysis. Meanwhile, given that this study was cross-sectional with an exploratory nature, determining the continuous cause-effect relationship between LBP and its risk factors in marathon was difficult. Hence, further research is needed to obtain a complete investigation on the occurrence of LBP in marathon runners, including timely feedback on the physical condition before the marathon and a follow-up survey after the competition, to determine further the factors that cause LBP in marathon runners.

5. Conclusions

This self-reported study revealed a 4.50% prevalence of running-related injuries of LBP in marathon runners. Factors, including warm-up activities, fatigue, running gait posture, and environmental temperature, were related to an increased risk of LBP in general. Therefore, if planning to prepare a marathon, sufficient strength training and adapting to environmental temperature in advance are highly essential for runners to prevent LBP. Also, an appropriate amount of regular warm-up activities to mobilise the entire body beforehand is a good choice to enhance the health of the lower back area. Meanwhile, the results may be a combination of special conditions that still need further studies for confirmation.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Fok Ying-Tong Education Foundation of China (161092), the scientific and technological research program of the Shanghai Science and Technology Committee (Fund number: 19080503100), and the Shanghai Key Lab of Human Performance (Shanghai University of Sport) (11DZ2261100).

References

  1. P. A. Latorre-Román, F. García-Pinillos, V. M. Soto-Hermoso, and M. Muñoz-Jiménez, “Effects of 12 weeks of barefoot running on foot strike patterns, inversion-eversion and foot rotation in long-distance runners,” Journal of Sport and Health Science, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 579–584, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. C. A. Johnston, J. E. Taunton, D. R. Lloyd-Smith, and D. C. McKenzie, “Preventing running injuries. Practical approach for family doctors,” Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien, vol. 49, pp. 1101–1109, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  3. R. N. van Gent, D. Siem, M. van Middelkoop et al., “Incidence and determinants of lower extremity running injuries in long distance runners: a systematic review COMMENTARY,” British Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 469–480, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. L. Vitez, P. Zupet, V. Zadnik, and M. Drobnič, “Running injuries in the participants of ljubljana marathon,” Slovenian Journal of Public Health, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 196–202, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. C. M. Bono, “Low-back pain in athletes,” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 382–396, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. J. M. Daniels, G. Pontius, S. El-Amin, and K. Gabriel, “Evaluation of low back pain in athletes,” Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 336–345, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. W.-L. Chang, Y.-F. Shih, and W.-Y. Chen, “Running injuries and associated factors in participants of ING Taipei Marathon,” Physical Therapy in Sport, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 170–174, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. L. Malisoux, J. Ramesh, R. Mann, R. Seil, A. Urhausen, and D. Theisen, “Can parallel use of different running shoes decrease running-related injury risk?” Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 110–115, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. S. Videbaek, A. M. Bueno, R. O. Nielsen, and S. Rasmussen, “Incidence of running-related injuries per 1000 h of running in different types of runners: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Sports Medicine, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 1017–1026, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  10. B. Kluitenberg, M. van Middelkoop, R. Diercks, and H. van der Worp, “What are the differences in injury proportions between different populations of runners? A systematic review and meta-analysis,” Sports Medicine, vol. 45, no. 8, pp. 1143–1161, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. M. Fredericson and A. K. Misra, “Epidemiology and aetiology of marathon running injuries,” Sports Medicine, vol. 37, no. 4-5, pp. 437–439, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. D. Hoffman, D. K. Lebus, A. C. Ganong, G. A. Casazza, and M. V. Loan, “Body composition of 161-km ultramarathoners,” International Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 31, no. 02, pp. 106–109, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. U. Barandun, B. Knechtle, P. Knechtle et al., “Running speed during training and percent body fat predict race time in recreational male marathoners,” Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 3, pp. 51–58, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. B. Knechtle, P. Knechtle, I. Schulze, and G. Kohler, “Upper arm circumference is associated with race performance in ultra-endurance runners,” British Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 295–299, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  15. D. Ramskov, S. Rasmussen, H. Sorensen et al., “Run Clever-No difference in risk of injury when comparing progression in running volume and running intensity in recreational runners: a randomised trial,” BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine, vol. 4, no. 1, Article ID e000333, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. I. Buist, S. W. Bredeweg, K. A. P. M. Lemmink, W. van Mechelen, and R. L. Diercks, “Predictors of running-related injuries in novice runners enrolled in a systematic training program,” The American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 273–280, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. M. Van Middelkoop, J. Kolkman, J. Van Ochten, S. M. A. Bierma-Zeinstra, and B. W. Koes, “Risk factors for lower extremity injuries among male marathon runners,” Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 691–697, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. J. P. Martinez-Cano, V. Cortes-Castillo, J. Martinez-Villa, J. C. Ramos, and J. P. Uribe, “Dysnatremia among runners in a half marathon performed under warm and humid conditions,” BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine, vol. 4, no. 1, Article ID e000351, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. W. H. Meeuwisse, H. Tyreman, B. Hagel, and C. Emery, “A dynamic model of etiology in sport injury: the recursive nature of risk and causation,” Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 215–219, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. N. J. Kasunich, “Changes in low back pain in a long distance runner after stretching the iliotibial band,” Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 37–40, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. A. Chalabaev, R. Radel, I. Ben Mahmoud, B. Massiera, T. Deroche, and F. d’Arripe-Longueville, “Is motivation for marathon a protective factor or a risk factor of injury?” Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 2040–2047, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. J. Alsobrook and S. M. Simons, “Sacral stress fracture in a marathon runner,” Current Sports Medicine Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 39–42, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. J. M. Thein-Nissenbaum, E. F. Thompson, E. S. Chumanov, and B. Heiderscheit, “Low back and hip pain in a postpartum runner: applying ultrasound imaging and running analysis,” Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 615–624, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. Y. Tu, J. Cao, Y. Bi et al., “Magnetic resonance imaging for chronic pain: diagnosis, manipulation, and biomarkers,” Science China Life Sciences, vol. 98, 2020. View at: Google Scholar
  25. L. Zhang, L. Zhou, Q. Ren et al., “Evaluating cortical alterations in patients with chronic back pain using neuroimaging techniques: recent advances and perspectives,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 10, p. 2527, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. D. Van Poppel, J. De Koning, A. P. Verhagen, and G. G. M. Scholten-Peeters, “Risk factors for lower extremity injuries among half marathon and marathon runners of the Lage Landen Marathon Eindhoven 2012: a prospective cohort study in The Netherlands,” Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 226–234, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. S. H. Snook, “Work-related low back pain: secondary intervention,” Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 153–160, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. H. Yang, S. Haldeman, M.-L. Lu, and D. Baker, “Low back pain prevalence and related workplace psychosocial risk factors: a study using data from the 2010 national health interview survey,” Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 459–472, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. C. J. McGowan, D. B. Pyne, K. G. Thompson, and B. Rattray, “Warm-up strategies for sport and exercise: mechanisms and applications,” Sports Medicine, vol. 45, no. 11, pp. 1523–1546, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. M. Masaki, H. Tateuchi, Y. Koyama, K. Sakuma, N. Otsuka, and N. Ichihashi, “Back muscle activity and sagittal spinal alignment during quadruped upper and lower extremity lift in young men with low back pain history,” Gait & Posture, vol. 66, pp. 221–227, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. D. G. Sale, “Postactivation potentiation: role in human performance,” Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 138–143, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. S. R. Gray, K. Soderlund, M. Watson, and R. A. Ferguson, “Skeletal muscle ATP turnover and single fibre ATP and PCr content during intense exercise at different muscle temperatures in humans,” Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology, vol. 462, no. 6, pp. 885–893, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. S. H. Faulkner, R. A. Ferguson, N. Gerrett, M. Hupperets, S. G. Hodder, and G. Havenith, “Reducing muscle temperature drop after warm-up improves sprint cycling performance,” Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 359–365, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. L. P. Kilduff, D. J. West, N. Williams, and C. J. Cook, “The influence of passive heat maintenance on lower body power output and repeated sprint performance in professional rugby league players,” Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 482–486, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. R. A. Needham, C. I. Morse, and H. Degens, “The acute effect of different warm-up protocols on anaerobic performance in elite youth soccer players,” Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 2614–2620, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. R. A. C. Caritá, C. C. Greco, and B. S. Denadai, “Prior heavy-intensity exercise’s enhancement of oxygen-uptake kinetics and short-term high-intensity exercise performance independent of aerobic-training status,” International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 339–345, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. K. Olson, O. Zimka, A. Pasiorowski, S. Iregbu, and N. G. Boule, “Tiredness, fatigue, and exhaustion as perceived by recreational marathon runners,” Qualitative Health Research, vol. 28, Article ID 1049732318785360, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  38. M. Solomonow, “Neuromuscular manifestations of viscoelastic tissue degradation following high and low risk repetitive lumbar flexion,” Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 155–175, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. D. M. Rempel, R. J. Harrison, and S. Barnhart, “Work-related cumulative trauma disorders of the upper extremity,” JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 267, no. 6, pp. 838–842, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. C. M. Bauer, F. M. Rast, M. J. Ernst et al., “The effect of muscle fatigue and low back pain on lumbar movement variability and complexity,” Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, vol. 33, pp. 94–102, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. A. Angeli, M. Minetto, A. Dovio, and P. Paccotti, “The overtraining syndrome in athletes: a stress-related disorder,” Journal of Endocrinological Investigation, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 603–612, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. C. M. Bauer, F. M. Rast, M. J. Ernst et al., “Pain intensity attenuates movement control of the lumbar spine in low back pain,” Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 919–927, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. T. L. Chen, D. W. Wong, Y. Wang et al., “Changes in segment coordination variability and the impacts of the lower limb across running mileages in half marathons: implications for running injuries,” Journal of Sport and Health Science, vol. 2095–2546, pp. 30122–30128, 2020. View at: Google Scholar
  44. J. P. Folland, S. J. Allen, M. I. Black, J. C. Handsaker, and S. E. Forrester, “Running technique is an important component of running economy and performance,” Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 1412–1423, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. A. Nummela, T. Keränen, and L. Mikkelsson, “Factors related to top running speed and economy,” International Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 655–661, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. A. Casado, B. Hanley, P. Jiménez-Reyes et al., “Pacing profiles and tactical behaviors of elite runners,” Journal of Sport and Health Science, vol. 2095–2546, pp. 30077–30086, 2020. View at: Google Scholar
  47. R. J. Maughan, “Distance running in hot environments: a thermal challenge to the elite runner,” Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 95–102, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. R. J. Maughan, P. Watson, and S. M. Shirreffs, “Heat and cold: what does the environment do to the marathon runner?” Sports Medicine, vol. 37, no. 4-5, pp. 396–399, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. S. K. Gill, A. Teixeira, L. Rama et al., “Circulatory endotoxin concentration and cytokine profile in response to exertional-heat stress during a multi-stage ultra-marathon competition,” Exercise Immunology Review, vol. 21, pp. 114–128, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  50. M. E. Maynard, C. Chung, A. Comer et al., “Ambient temperature influences the neural benefits of exercise,” Behavioural Brain Research, vol. 299, pp. 27–31, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2021 Bao Wu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views211
Downloads190
Citations

Related articles