Stem Cells International

Stem Cells International / 2017 / Article
Special Issue

Mitochondria: More than Just “Power Plants” in Stem Cells

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2017 |Article ID 2874283 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2874283

Jarmon G. Lees, David K. Gardner, Alexandra J. Harvey, "Pluripotent Stem Cell Metabolism and Mitochondria: Beyond ATP", Stem Cells International, vol. 2017, Article ID 2874283, 17 pages, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2874283

Pluripotent Stem Cell Metabolism and Mitochondria: Beyond ATP

Academic Editor: Martin Stimpfel
Received28 Mar 2017
Accepted07 May 2017
Published19 Jul 2017

Abstract

Metabolism is central to embryonic stem cell (ESC) pluripotency and differentiation, with distinct profiles apparent under different nutrient milieu, and conditions that maintain alternate cell states. The significance of altered nutrient availability, particularly oxygen, and metabolic pathway activity has been highlighted by extensive studies of their impact on preimplantation embryo development, physiology, and viability. ESC similarly modulate their metabolism in response to altered metabolite levels, with changes in nutrient availability shown to have a lasting impact on derived cell identity through the regulation of the epigenetic landscape. Further, the preferential use of glucose and anaplerotic glutamine metabolism serves to not only support cell growth and proliferation but also minimise reactive oxygen species production. However, the perinuclear localisation of spherical, electron-poor mitochondria in ESC is proposed to sustain ESC nuclear-mitochondrial crosstalk and a mitochondrial-H2O2 presence, to facilitate signalling to support self-renewal through the stabilisation of HIFα, a process that may be favoured under physiological oxygen. The environment in which a cell is grown is therefore a critical regulator and determinant of cell fate, with metabolism, and particularly mitochondria, acting as an interface between the environment and the epigenome.

1. Introduction

Beyond roles in ATP production, metabolism and mitochondria lie at the nexus of cell signalling. A direct link between metabolic pathway activity and chromatin dynamics has recently been recognised, primarily because metabolic intermediates of cellular metabolism are required as cofactors for epigenetic modulators [1]. Changes in nutrient use have also been shown to modulate lineage specification [25], indicating that metabolism acts as a regulator of cell fate.

As the precursors to all adult cell types, the preimplantation embryo and derived embryonic stem cells (ESC) represent a nutrient-sensitive paradigm to understand the interaction between the nutrient environment and the regulation of development and differentiation. Studies on the impact of culture on preimplantation embryo development have highlighted the persistence of physiological perturbations induced by altered metabolism and nutrient availability during this short window of development [69]. ESC are similarly sensitive to nutrient availability in their environment, responding with significant shifts in primary metabolic pathways [10, 11].

Consequently, the significance of nutrient availability, particularly physiological oxygen (1–5%), and the role of the mitochondria and mitochondrial-derived reactive oxygen species (ROS), in regulating ESC physiology, cell state, cell fate, and the epigenome, are considered. Metabolism emerges as an interface between the environment and genome regulation, such that alterations in metabolic pathway activity disrupt the production and availability of cofactors required for epigenetic modifier activity, resulting in an altered epigenetic landscape.

2. Defining Pluripotent Stem Cell States In Vitro

ESC pluripotency represents a continuum of cell states, characterised by distinct cellular, metabolic, and epigenetic states. The capacity to maintain pluripotency relies on complex signalling networks that are regulated by the surrounding microenvironment; however, differing growth factor requirements and signalling in vitro between mouse and human ESC are presumed to reflect origins from different developmental stages within the embryo [12]. Mouse ESC derived from the inner cell mass (ICM) of the blastocyst into serum/LIF conditions are representative of D4.5 ICM, a transitional stage within the pluripotency continuum that is functionally distinct from mouse ESC derived from a medium containing GSK and MEK inhibitors (2i), representative of day 3.5 ICM (naïve ESC) [13]. In contrast, human ESC rely on fiborblast growth factor (FGF) signalling to maintain pluripotency [14, 15], similar to mouse epiblast stem cells (EpiSC), representative of the postimplantation epiblast.

Numerous studies have focused on defining the molecular properties of ESC, particularly the transcription factor regulatory network, OCT4, NANOG, and SOX2, and the growth factor requirements of these populations (reviewed by [16]). Underpinning pluripotency are complex epigenetic mechanisms required for the progressive transitions during development which restrict cell potency and maintain cell fate decisions, silencing pluripotency genes and activating lineage-specific genes [17]. ESC are characterised by a euchromatic and highly dynamic chromatin landscape [18] and elevated global transcriptional activity [19]. Bivalent methylation, marked by a combination of active H3K4me3 and repressive H3K27me3 at a subset of developmental regulators, has been proposed to establish a primed epigenetic state, ready for activation prior to ESC differentiation [20], and to safeguard differentiation [21]. Progression through the early events of differentiation is accompanied by global changes in the epigenetic landscape, characterised by restricted gene expression and extensive regions of heterochromatin. Lineage-specific DNA methylation patterns are established, and repressive marks, such as H3K9me3, are upregulated within differentiated cells [22].

Establishment and maintenance of the epigenetic landscape rely on the activity of epigenetic modifiers that regulate DNA methylation, histone modification, and chromatin organisation. DNA methylation is regulated by DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) that act as methyl donors for cytosine residues, restricting gene expression. Conversely, active demethylation is catalysed by ten-eleven translocation (TET) dioxygenases, responsible for the conversion of 5-methylcytosine (5mC) to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) [23]. Methylation of arginine and lysine residues on histones H3 and H4 is catalysed by histone methyltransferases (HMTs), the modifications of which are associated with both transcriptional activation and repression. Histone acetylation, catalysed by histone acetyltransferases (HATs), is generally associated with a euchromatic state, permissive to transcription. Conversely, histone deacetylation, via histone deacetylases (HDACs), is associated with condensed heterochromatin resulting in transcriptional repression. Functionality of epigenetic modifiers requires specific metabolites and cofactors, serving to transduce changes in the microenvironment to alter chromatin state [24, 25]. Specifically, S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), generated through one carbon metabolism, integrating the folate and methionine cycles, acts as the primary methyl donor for DNA and histone methylation. Similarly, TET activity is dynamically regulated by alpha-ketoglutarate (αKG) and succinate, products of the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle [26]. Acetylation transfers an acetyl group from acetyl coenzyme A (acetyl-CoA) to lysine residues, while HDAC activity is regulated by NAD+-independent or NAD+-dependent mechanisms [27]. Cellular fluctuations in metabolism in response to various physiological cues, including nutrient availability and metabolic pathway activity, therefore have the capacity to modulate the epigenome through the activity of these epigenetic modifiers.

Accompanying the transition from naïve pluripotency to a primed pluripotent state are changes in metabolism. Naïve mouse ESC are reliant on oxidative metabolism [28, 29], while EpiSC and human ESC metabolism is predominantly glycolytic [28, 30], accompanied by glutaminolysis [10]. Human naïve ESC have recently been obtained in culture, using a number of different protocols [3135], with the transition accompanied by a similar metabolic remodelling towards a more oxidative [33] metabolism, although glycolysis remains important [36]. As metabolic change accompanies the transitions between cell states, including differentiation, recent studies have begun to elucidate the interplay between metabolites and the ESC epigenetic landscape, establishing a link between ESC metabolic state, epigenetics, and cell fate.

3. Nutrients in the In Vivo Stem Cell Niche

Until recently, little attention has been paid to the nutritional milieu within the stem cell niche. In vivo, the embryonic stem cell niche is comprised of a rich and complex mixture of proteins and metabolites, none of which are likely to be superfluous, and which maintain the viability of the developing embryo compared to the relatively simple composition of in vitro culture media. Mammalian reproductive tract fluids contain high levels of potassium, glucose, lactate, and pyruvate as energy sources, free amino acids including high levels of glycine, and proteins including albumin and immunoglobulin G, glycoproteins, prostaglandins, steroid hormones, and growth factors [37, 38]. This complex microenvironment changes composition dynamically throughout the estrus cycle and within different compartments of the tract [39, 40], indicating a tight regulatory mechanism to ensure proper embryo development.

Oxygen is a critical, but often overlooked, component within the stem cell niche. Vascularisation, and consequently the supply of oxygen, is tissue specific, ranging from ~9.5% in the human kidney to ~6.4% in bone marrow and ~4.7% oxygen in the brain [41]. Cellular oxygen ranges from 1.3 to 2.5%, while oxygen within the mitochondria is estimated to be <1.3% [41]. The mammalian reproductive tract, within which the preimplantation embryo develops, has been measured at 2–9% oxygen in the rat, rabbit, hamster, and rhesus monkey [42, 43]. The uterine environment ranges from 1.5 to 2.0% oxygen in the rhesus monkey and decreases from 5.3% to 3.5% in the rabbit and hamster, around the time of blastocyst formation and subsequent implantation [42, 44]. The precise oxygen concentration experienced by the inner cell mass of the human blastocyst is unknown, but likely approximates less than 5% oxygen [45, 46]. In spite of such physiological data on oxygen levels, atmospheric (20%) oxygen remains the predominant concentration used for cell culture, including stem cells and human embryos [47], with limited adoption of more physiological oxygen concentrations (1–5%). However, neither of these conditions sufficiently capture the dynamic changes in oxygen concentration that occur during embryo and fetal development in vivo.

The significance of establishing an appropriate niche environment in vitro is apparent in the loss of embryo viability observed in vitro relative to in vivo conditions [48, 49]. The developing embryo is responsive to nutrient changes in its environment, where perturbations in nutrient availability alter metabolism through gene expression and altered gene imprinting status [50, 51]. While embryo metabolism appears relatively plastic in its response to suboptimal osmotic, pH, ionic, and nutrient changes in its environment, there is a significant loss in viability [52, 53]. ESC metabolism is plausibly similar in its plasticity, able to maintain proliferation under a range of suboptimal culture conditions.

4. Lessons Learned from the Preimplantation Embryo

Preimplantation embryo development represents a unique window of sensitivity during development encompassing the first lineage decisions and the most significant period of epigenetic programming that will persist in resultant daughter cells and their differentiated progeny [54]. Suboptimal embryo culture conditions, including atmospheric oxygen, serum supplementation, ammonium buildup, and the absence of necessary metabolites such as amino acids, have been shown to alter developmental kinetics, delay blastocyst development, and lower blastocyst numbers, mirrored by a loss of viability postimplantation [9, 5557]. Culture in the presence of atmospheric oxygen is associated with retarded embryo development in several species ([58-60], reviewed by [61, 62]). Atmospheric oxygen delays mouse and human embryo cleavage prior to the 8-cell stage [63], resulting in a reduction in subsequent blastocyst quality [9]. Significantly, exposure to atmospheric oxygen during early cleavage is irreversible, as subsequent postcompaction culture at physiological oxygen is unable to restore blastocyst viability, highlighting the susceptibility of the early embryo to environmental stresses. Furthermore, the detrimental effects of atmospheric oxygen on gametes and embryos also manifest as changes in blastocyst gene expression [64, 65] and the proteome [66], perturbed metabolic activity, including loss of metabolic homeostasis and a reduced capacity for the transamination of waste products [7, 8, 48, 67], and a reduction in birth rates in humans by 10–15% [68, 69]. During this time, the most substantial epigenetic changes in the life of the organism occur (reviewed by [70]), thereby representing a sensitive window of development during which metabolic perturbations have the potential to alter the epigenetic landscape, impacting daughter cells. The sensitivity of the mammalian embryo to metabolite availability, and metabolic perturbations, infers that ESC, iPSCs, and potentially all in vitro-derived cell types may be similarly perturbed by nonphysiological culture conditions, with long-lasting/hereditary effects. Studies examining preimplantation embryo physiology, and the significance of metabolism and metabolic regulation during development, were instrumental in developing culture conditions capable of supporting embryo development [6] and highlight the need to understand ESC physiology, and how in vitro culture and nutrient availability impacts their functionality, particularly given the proposed use of these cells for clinical applications.

5. The Metabolic Framework of Pluripotent Stem Cells: The Relevance of Glucose and Glutamine Metabolism

Preimplantation embryo metabolism is characterised by a dependency on pyruvate, lactate, and aspartate, and a limited capacity for glucose, prior to compaction [48, 71], switching to an increasing need for glucose uptake and conversion to lactate [6], accompanied by an increase in oxygen consumption [72] postcompaction. This shift is driven in part by the exponential increase in cell number from the morula to the blastocyst stage, and by the energy required to generate and maintain the blastocoel (reviewed by [53]). While the trophectoderm, which forms the placenta, has the capacity to oxidise around half the glucose consumed, the ICM is predominantly glycolytic [73], converting approximately 100% of the glucose consumed to lactate, even in the presence of sufficient oxygen to support its complete oxidation [74].

Similar to the ICM, mouse and human ESC metabolism is characterised by a dependency upon glycolysis [11, 36, 7578] (Figure 1), converting approximately 70–80% of the glucose consumed to lactate. Unlike oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), which generates 36 ATP from the oxidation of glucose, glycolysis generates only 4 molecules of ATP. However, ATP can be generated quickly through glycolysis [79], such that equivalent levels of ATP can be generated provided there is a sufficient flux of glucose. The reliance of ESC on glycolysis is plausibly necessary to maintain a high cellular NADPH, allowing for rapid cell expansion through amino acid and nucleotide synthesis for proliferation [80]. Lactate generation, via lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), facilitates the regeneration of cytosolic NAD+ required for the conversion of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate to 1,3-biphosphoglycerate in glycolysis, ensuring continued glucose utilisation. Alternatively, glucose-derived pyruvate can be oxidised through the TCA cycle to provide lipids and carbon donors, such as acetyl-CoA necessary for membrane synthesis [81], and synthesis of the amino acids serine, glycine, cysteine, and alanine necessary for cell division. In human ESC, glucose-derived carbon metabolised through the oxidative pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), contributes between 50 and 70% of cytosolic NADPH [10], which is required for the constant reduction of antioxidants in order to keep them functional. Proliferation of both naïve mouse ESC and serum/LIF ESC is abolished in the absence of glucose [82, 83], and inhibition of glycolysis with nonmetabolisable 2-deoxyglucose significantly reduces mouse ESC self-renewal [76], demonstrating an absolute requirement for glucose in supporting self-renewal. The preferential metabolism of glucose through glycolysis also provides a means of generating ATP without the formation of ROS in pluripotent cells, allowing a level of control over the amount of ROS generated.

Pyruvate flux in human ESC is in part regulated by the mitochondrial inner membrane protein uncoupling protein 2 (UCP2), which acts to shunt glucose-derived carbon away from mitochondrial oxidation and into the PPP [84] (Figure 1). Retinoic acid-induced human ESC differentiation results in reduced UCP2 expression, accompanied by decreased glycolysis and increased OXPHOS [84]. Further, human ESC have a limited capacity to utilise citrate derived from pyruvate to generate ATP through OXPHOS, due to low levels of aconitase 2 and isocitrate dehydrogenase 2/3, concurrent with high expression of ATP-citrate lyase [85]. Significantly, inhibition of pyruvate oxidation stimulates anaplerotic glutamine metabolism in human ESC [85], and glutamine-derived acetyl-CoA production in human cancer cells [86, 87], which are similarly increased in ESC [88]. Plausibly, limited pyruvate oxidation may function to balance ROS production, enhance glutamine utilisation as an anaplerotic source, and stimulate NAD+ recycling to maintain a high flux through glycolysis for rapid cellular growth and proliferation to support pluripotent self-renewal. In support of this, differentiation of mouse naïve ESC and human ESC alters the glycolytic:oxidative balance within 48 hours [30, 8991].

Due to the principal requirement for glycolysis in ESC metabolism, the role of glutaminolysis has been relatively overlooked. However, after glucose, glutamine is the most highly consumed nutrient in human ESC culture [11, 77, 78] and is essential for human [10] and mouse [83] ESC proliferation. Other highly proliferative cell types, including tumour cells, use glutaminolysis to recycle NADPH for antioxidant reduction, fatty acid and nucleotide biosynthesis, and anaplerosis (synthesis of TCA cycle intermediates), while glucose-derived carbon is used for macromolecule synthesis [92]. Indeed, in mouse ESC cultured in the presence of glucose, virtually all glutamate, αKG, and malate in the TCA are derived from glutaminolysis [83]. In contrast, naïve mouse ESC are able to proliferate without exogenous glutamine, but only by using glucose to synthesise glutamate for anaplerosis [83]. Human ESC also make extensive use of glutaminolysis [10], which metabolic modelling suggests is likely used for ATP and synthesis of antioxidants (glutathione and NADPH), and anaplerotic pathways [93]. Glutamine-derived glutathione (GSH), a powerful cellular antioxidant, prevents the oxidation OCT4 cysteine residues and subsequent degradation, allowing OCT4 to bind DNA [94]. Combined, these data suggest that glucose and glutamine independently regulate metabolic pathway flux in ESC, and that nutrient availability can significantly impact metabolic pathway activity and cell state.

6. Nutrient Availability Modulates Pluripotency and the Epigenetic Landscape

The culture/nutrient environment in which a cell resides, in vivo or in vitro, and its resultant impact on the intracellular metabolite pool, plays a defining role in determining cellular phenotype. Metabolites can have a long-term impact on a cell through regulation of the epigenome, a relatively new field known as metaboloepigenetics, and their availability has been shown to impact ESC self-renewal and lineage specification (reviewed by [24, 25]).

ESC cell maintenance, cell fate, and DNA methylation have been shown to be regulated by the availability and utilisation of a number of amino acids. The first amino acid found to regulate pluripotent cell state was L-proline. Uptake of proline or ornithine drives mouse ESC differentiation to early primitive ectoderm [2, 95, 96]. This transition is accompanied by alterations in replication timing and H3K9/K36 methylation [97, 98]. Subsequent studies have identified the requirement for specific amino acids for the maintenance of pluripotency. Threonine is the only amino acid essential for the maintenance of pluripotency in mouse ESC and is responsible for maintaining a high cellular SAM level [5, 99]. Depletion of threonine leads to slowed mouse ESC growth, increased differentiation, and a reduction in SAM levels which leads to reduced H3K4me3 [5]. In a similar manner, human ESC require high levels of methionine [4]. Methionine deprivation causes a rapid reduction in SAM levels resulting in a rapid decrease in H3K4me3, while also decreasing NANOG, priming human ESC for differentiation [4].

Glutamine utilisation has been shown to contribute to αKG pools in mouse ESC, with naïve cells prioritising glutamine use to maintain αKG pools for active demethylation through the regulation of Jumonji and TET demethylases [83]. Glutamine depletion from 2i conditions leads to increased tri-methylation of H3K9, H3K27, H3K26, and H4K20 levels in naïve mouse ESC, which retain their ability to proliferate at a reduced rate. Naïve cells are capable of generating glutamine from glucose, while primed mouse ESC are unable to proliferate in the absence of glutamine [83]. Recently, supplementation with αKG during human ESC differentiation has been shown to accelerate the expression of neuroectoderm and endoderm markers [100]. In the presence of αKG, H3K4 and H3K27 trimethylation of differentiating human ESC increased, although an overall reduction in global methylation levels was observed [100]. Similarly, glucose-derived acetyl-CoA contributes to the modulation of the ESC epigenetic landscape, where differentiation, or the inhibition of glycolysis with 2-deoxyglucose, leads to a reduction in H3K9/K27 acetylation, which can be restored by supplementation of the acetyl-CoA precursor acetate [88]. These data highlight the changing metabolic requirements of the cell with progression through pluripotency and with differentiation and emphasise the need to customise nutrient conditions to support specific lineages.

Combined, these studies provide links between metabolism and pluripotency through chromatin state. It will be important to understand how, and if, metabolite presence/absence and abundance drives differentiation to more mature lineages through altered cell state, or whether metabolites select cell populations that are more receptive to differentiation. Indeed, cell type-specific metabolic requirements can be used to purify derivative populations. Human ESC-derived cardiomyocytes can be purified using a glucose-depleted, lactate-rich medium [101], or by sorting for high mitochondrial membrane potential [102], effectively eliminating undifferentiated ESC. Examination of metabolite compartmentalisation within cells, particularly the dynamic requirements that likely occur during cell differentiation, will also be crucial to understand the functional consequences of metabolic flux.

7. Oxygen Regulates ESC Pluripotency

Physiological oxygen conditions (~1–5%) have been reported to facilitate the maintenance of pluripotency, and reduce spontaneous differentiation in mouse [103] and human ESC [104106]. Further, it has been shown to improve chromosome stability [107], preserve methylation status [108, 109], maintain 2 active X chromosomes [110], and facilitate the derivation of mouse [111] and human ESC [112]. Physiological oxygen increases pSmad2/3 levels, an indicator of TGFβ receptor activation, and decreases lineage markers in human ESC [113, 114], while increasing the efficiency of embryoid body (EB) formation [113]. In contrast, other studies have reported no benefits of low-oxygen culture on the expression of pluripotency markers [115, 116] or surface antigen expression [104] in human ESC. This lack of consensus has plausibly arisen from the many variations in culture conditions used, including the presence or absence of feeders which would respond to altered oxygen conditions [49], medium composition, type of protein supplement, osmolality, pH, or the considerable heterogeneity that exists between human ESC lines [117, 118]. Despite the significant body of evidence for the detrimental effect of atmospheric oxygen conditions from preimplantation embryo studies [49, 50, 61], and emerging evidence that oxygen and ROS [119] can impact the epigenome, ESC culture is predominantly performed under 20% oxygen conditions. In contrast, physiological oxygen levels have become mainstream for naïve cell generation and maintenance [3133], primarily due to their stabilising effects.

Significantly, physiological oxygen has been shown to accelerate and improve the differentiation of mouse ESC to EpiSCs. Compared with atmospheric oxygen conditions, mouse EpiSCs exhibit a gene expression profile, methylation state, and cadherin profile more similar to in vivo EpiSCs under 5% oxygen [120]. Multiple stem cell types similarly display enhanced differentiation at physiological oxygen. Culture at 2% oxygen is highly beneficial for the derivation and expansion of human retinal progenitor cells [121], increasing population doublings by up to 25 times and enhancing their potential to form photoreceptors [122, 123]. 5% oxygen also facilitates human endothelial cell differentiation through increased expression of vascular endothelial cadherin, CD31, lectin binding, and rapid cord structure formation [124]. Significantly, 5% oxygen culture during the initial 3 days of a 6-day differentiation protocol generates two distinct cell populations, VEcad+ colonies surrounded by PDGFRβ+ pericytes, while 5% oxygen during the second half of differentiation blocks the emergence of these distinct populations. This suggests that there are specific windows of differentiation where oxygen interactions are critical in determining lineage specification. Targeted oxygenation regimes during differentiation likewise increase the yield and purity of neurons [125], definitive endoderm [126], and cardiac differentiation from ESC and iPSCs [127]. This is reminiscent of preimplantation embryo development, which requires precise control over the oxygen and metabolite environment [49]. Consequently, oxygen, and the concentration of other metabolites, will need to be modelled on in vivo niches to achieve the most efficient and viable differentiation outcomes.

8. Physiological Oxygen Underlies a More Active Metabolic State

ESC similarly elicit a conserved physiological response to culture under physiological oxygen conditions. When cultured under physiological oxygen conditions, human ESC increase the flux of glucose through glycolysis (Figure 1) [11, 77, 93, 128], accompanied by increased glycolytic gene expression [77, 116] and decreased oxidative gene expression [11]. Oxygen has also been shown to regulate human ESC mitochondrial activity and biogenesis [11, 128], as occurs in somatic cells [129]. Physiological oxygen increases the expression of glycolytic genes, while reducing human ESC mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) levels, total cellular ATP, and mitochondrial mass and the expression of metabolic genes associated with mitochondrial activity and replication compared to 20% oxygen culture [11]. Physiological oxygen conditions therefore establish a metabolic state characterised by increased glycolytic flux and suppressed mitochondrial biogenesis and activity (Figure 1).

This conserved cellular response is mediated through the stabilisation of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) alpha subunits at physiological oxygen conditions (reviewed by [130]), with HIF activity increasing exponentially as oxygen concentrations decrease below 7% [131]. The human ESC response to physiological oxygen, as for the preimplantation embryo [64], is mediated primarily through HIF2α stabilisation, the silencing of which is accompanied by a reduction in OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG protein expression [105]. HIF2α also binds directly to the GLUT1 promoter increasing GLUT1 levels in human ESC at physiological oxygen [128] (Figure 1), associated with increased glucose consumption. The main HIF alpha subunit, HIF1α, is only transiently expressed in the nucleus of human ESC upon culture under 5% oxygen conditions, suppressed by the expression of the negative regulator HIF3α [105]. Interestingly, overexpression of HIF1α in naïve mouse ESC is sufficient to drive metabolic change from a bivalent oxidative and glycolytic metabolism to one primarily reliant on glycolysis, accompanied by a shift towards an activin/nodal-dependent EpiSC-like state [28], inferring that metabolic regulation alone is sufficient to drive cell state transitions.

Mathematical modelling suggests that ESC display a greater metabolite flux in 70% of modelled metabolic reactions with physiological oxygen culture [93], indicating that low oxygen conditions actually support a more active human ESC state. Cancer cell lines also demonstrate an increase in general metabolic activity under low oxygen, characterised by elevated intracellular levels of glucose, threonine, proline and glutamine, and fatty acid and phospholipid catabolic processes [132]. A higher metabolic turnover emerges as a shared feature of highly proliferative cell types. However, as proliferation is not increased at low oxygen in human ESC studies [11, 77], increased metabolic activity could therefore be underpinning pluripotency through the provision of epigenetic modifiers. Plausibly, altered glycolytic, TCA flux, and amino acid metabolism will modulate the levels of αKG, NAD+, and acetyl-coA, thereby regulating the activity of epigenetic modifiers. Indeed, physiological oxygen culture results in the methylation of the OCT4 hypoxia-response element (HRE) of human ESC, while at 20% oxygen, NANOG and SOX2 HREs display methylation marks characteristic of transcriptional silencing [109].

9. ESC Mitochondrial Morphology Is Reminiscent of the Preimplantation Embryo

Mitochondrial morphology is highly dynamic reflecting the developmental stage and metabolic requirements of the cell [133, 134] (Figure 2). In growing and maturing oocytes, mitochondria are primarily spherical, with pale matrices and small vesicular cristae, clustered around the nucleus [135]. By ovulation, mitochondria are the most prominent organelle in the oocyte cytoplasm [136], and the oocyte contains approximately an order of magnitude more mtDNA copies than most somatic cells (reviewed by [137]). Following fertilisation, mitochondria cluster around the 2 pronuclei [136, 138], plausibly, to meet increased energy demands and ensure an even distribution between dividing cells. During the 2- to 8-cell cleavage events of embryonic development, spherical mitochondria are partially replaced with elongated (height = ~3 × width) mitochondria with transverse cristae [136]; this further changes at the early blastocyst stage during differentiation into ICM and trophectoderm, expansion, and hatching of the blastocyst, when highly elongated mitochondria appear [135]. In human apical trophoblast cells, mitochondria are elongated, with transverse cristae, and are largely peripherally located [139], plausibly to facilitate the energetically costly process of blastocoel expansion and zona hatching [140]. Within the ICM and polar trophoblast cells, there is a mixed population of round/vacuolated and elongated/cristae-rich mitochondria that remain perinuclear [135, 139, 141].

In vitro human ESC mitochondria resemble those of in vivo ICM cells [135, 139] (Figure 2) and primordial germ cells (PGCs) [136], containing spherical mitochondria with clear matrices and few peripheral arched cristae (Lees et al. unpublished data; [30, 142, 143]), coincident with lower levels of mitochondrial DNA [11], oxygen consumption, and OXPHOS [84, 144, 145]. Comparatively, somatic cells typically contain filamentous, networked mitochondria with well-defined transverse cristae supporting a higher level of mitochondrial oxygen consumption and oxidative metabolism [30, 142]. The mitochondrial morphology of naïve human ESC is also suggestive of an earlier developmental time point as they display round, vacuolated mitochondria with few cristae compared to primed human ESC [31]. Significantly, naïve human ESC do not attain a mitochondrial morphology equivalent to that of in vivo human or mouse ICM cells, typified by a mixed mitochondrial complement [135]. This suggests that the conditions used to acquire or maintain pluripotency are insufficient for establishing an in vivo-like mitochondrial structure. This is not surprising given its considerable complexity; however, it suggests that only through a close physiological examination of in vivo cells can we hope to achieve in vitro counterparts with the same functionality. However, it is currently unclear at which precise developmental stage in vivo or in vitro all mitochondria take on a dispersed, reticulated, cristae-rich morphology, although it appears coincident with terminal differentiation, accompanied by an increased requirement for oxidative metabolism and a decreased requirement for self-renewal. This reticulated morphology has been observed after ~35 days of terminal neural differentiation to oligodendrocytes [89, 146] and upon terminal differentiation to cardiomyocytes [143]. Conversely, inhibition of mitochondrial fusion during reprogramming, forcibly fragmenting the mitochondrial network, facilitates the acquisition of pluripotency through a ROS-HIF-dependent mechanism [147], highlighting the requirement for dynamic modulation of mitochondrial structure across cell states.

10. Mitochondrial ROS and Perinuclear Localisation: A Requirement for ESC Proliferation?

In spite of the utilisation of aerobic glycolysis, ESC mitochondria, and mitochondrial function, are critical to maintaining pluripotency, self-renewal, and survival [148]. While inhibitors of mitochondrial metabolism increase glycolytic flux and the expression of pluripotent markers in ESC [148, 149], loss of mitochondrial function, following the knockdown of growth factor erv1-like (Gfer) [150], or mitochondrial polymerase PolG [145], or following mtDNA mutagenesis [151], result in mitochondrial fragmentation, reduced pluripotency, decreased cell survival and embryoid body forming potential, and the loss of pluripotency in mouse and human ESC. These data therefore highlight an absolute requirement for mitochondria, despite pluripotency being enhanced when OXPHOS is inhibited. Mitochondrial signalling (reviewed by [152]), independent of metabolic activity, may therefore have a role in regulating self-renewal.

In vivo, the location of mitochondria and their interaction with other organelles mark distinct developmental and cellular events. Mitochondria form complexes and localise strongly with other organelles, including the smooth endoplasmic reticulum and vesicles in the post-ovulation oocyte, plausibly generating cellular components in anticipation of fertilisation, as post-fertilisation; these complexes gradually recede [136] (Figure 2). Both in the embryo [136], mouse ESC [145] and human ESC [75, 143, 148], a perinuclear localisation of mitochondria is evident, and is typical of highly proliferative cell types [153], including cancers [154157]. Expansion of mitochondria from the perinuclear space to a dispersed distribution occurs within 3–7 days of the initiation of ESC differentiation [143, 145, 148]. Significantly, dispersed mitochondria in somatic cells revert to a perinuclear localisation once reprogrammed to a stem-cell like state [75, 148], indicating that close contact with the nucleus is required for either pluripotency and/or self-renewal.

Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain perinuclear mitochondria including a requirement for crosstalk between the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes (reviewed by [137, 158]), buffering the nucleus from calcium fluctuations in the cytoplasm, and efficient energy transfer for transport of macromolecules across the nuclear membrane (reviewed by [159]). Indeed, in human ESC, mitochondria localise perinuclearly throughout mitosis, only moving to congregate around the cleavage furrow [148], likely providing energy to the contractile rings that cleave the cell in two. This is despite the fact that human ESC mitochondria maintain a relatively small inner mitochondrial membrane surface area for the assembly of respiratory chain complexes, accompanied by low levels of oxygen consumption even when working at maximal respiratory capacity [84, 144, 145].

Beyond the production of ATP via OXPHOS, mitochondrial respiration also generates ROS, in the form of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) primarily generated from complex III of the ETC [160, 161]. ROS serve as signalling molecules within a physiological range, compared with their better known role in DNA damage when in excess [162]. ROS directly modulate numerous processes through the modification of kinases, transcription factor activity, and metabolic enzymes and proteins involved in nutrient-sensing pathways, and are capable of stimulating proliferation in a number of cell types [163]. Indeed, self-renewal in human and mouse ESC-derived neural stem cells relies upon high endogenous levels of ROS from cytoplasmic NOX activity [164, 165], supporting a role for endogenous ROS in regulating stemness. The acute proximity of the mitochondria to the nucleus in pluripotent stem cells is suggestive of a signalling axis whereby ROS, in the form of H2O2, may provide mitogenic signals [166], plausibly through regulation of the HIF family of transcription factors (Figure 1). This hypothesis is supported by evidence of a prolonged mitochondrial H2O2 presence stabilising HIFα proteins at both physiological [160, 161, 167169] and atmospheric oxygen conditions [170]. As HIFs modulate OCT4 activity [171], and HIF2α both promotes and is necessary for self-renewal and the pluripotent transcription network in mouse and human ESC [105, 172], mitochondrial ROS signalling may underlie the acquisition and maintenance of pluripotency (Figure 1). Indeed, addition of N-acetylcysteine during reprogramming of somatic cells to a pluripotent-like state has been shown to decrease ROS-mediated stabilisation of HIFs [147], necessary for restructuring metabolism towards glycolysis to support pluripotency. Consequently, physiological oxygen would establish an ongoing H2O2 presence within a physiological range, capable of sustaining HIF2α activity with prolonged culture. In contrast, the increase in mitochondrial activity associated with culture under atmospheric oxygen likely generates supraphysiological levels of H2O2 and more damaging species. As such, increased mitochondrial activity under atmospheric oxygen, accompanied by increased glutathione recycling, may be required to generate sufficient H202 to maintain HIF regulation under atmospheric conditions. Signalling by ROS may explain the maintenance of HIF2α under atmospheric conditions in ESC, albeit at lower levels compared with physiological oxygen [105]. Therefore, a precise balance between ROS production and neutralisation is likely necessary, dependent upon the prevailing oxygen conditions.

Superoxide (O2) can rapidly be reduced to H2O2 in either the cytosol, the mitochondrial matrix, or the extracellular environment by superoxide dismutases (SODs) 1, 2, and 3, respectively. While SODs are highly expressed in human ESC [142], mitochondrial ROS generated from complex III cannot be reduced by SODs; instead, reduction to H2O is carried out by the glutathione/glutathione peroxidase (GSH/GPX) system using the oxidation of NADPH to NADP+ [168], which is also highly active in human iPSCs [173]. In addition to providing the cell with biosynthetic precursors, glutaminolysis also supports the de novo synthesis of glutathione and NADPH, which protect cells from potential damage by the buildup of excess ROS. Therefore, ESC maintain high levels of cytosolic and mitochondrial antioxidants and reducing agents in the forms of GSH, NADPH, and SOD2, to cope with damaging levels of ROS [142, 144, 173, 174]; and yet, ROS generated from the oxidative metabolism of glucose and glutamine are plausibly vital signalling molecules that play a pivotal role in human ESC metabolism and self-renewal.

Thus, an unconventional theory of ESC mitochondria and ROS emerges. The morphology and location of ESC mitochondria, strategically located around the nucleus in great numbers yet with limited OXPHOS capacity, suggest a metabolic strategy that may involve prioritising ATP supply for proliferation via glycolysis, coincident with regulated ROS levels adjacent to the nucleus to stimulate HIF-mediated proliferation (Figure 1). Substantial antioxidant production limits the damaging effects of the H2O2 while still enabling signalling. Interestingly, this metabolic strategy benefits from physiological oxygen, as reduced oxygen stimulates GSH production in human ESC [175] and has been shown to increase H2O2 production from complex III in human cancer cells [176, 177]. Mitochondrial H2O2 generated from physiological oxygen does not induce DNA damage, acting primarily as a signalling molecule [160]. Hence, a delicate ROS/antioxidant balance is struck, coordinated by metabolic pathway activity. Plausibly, persistent atmospheric oxygen used in culture will affect this balance, resulting in either suboptimal signalling levels or pathological levels of ROS and perturbed gene regulation.

11. The Emerging Complexity of Mitochondrial Epigenetic Regulation

In addition to their role in signalling, ROS have been shown to directly alter the epigenetic landscape (reviewed by [178]). Direct oxidative modification of the methyl group of 5-methylcytosine prevents DNMT1 methylation of the target cytosine [179]. Conversely, ROS have been shown to induce DNA methylation of the E-cadherin promoter in hepatocarcinoma cells, accompanied by HDAC1, DNMT1, and methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (MeCP2) [180]. These data further support the need to modulate ROS within a tight physiological range. As mitochondrial metabolism also controls the levels of the key cofactors acetyl-CoA, αKG, and NADH/NAD+ and TCA intermediates including citrate and succinate, which, as discussed, act as substrates for epigenetic modifiers [181]. Metabolism, and particularly mitochondria, therefore acts as an interface between the environment and the nuclear epigenome. However, nuclear-mitochondrial cross-talk goes beyond the unidirectional regulation of cellular homeostasis, nuclear gene expression, and the nuclear epigenetic landscape. Mitochondrial DNA encodes 2 rRNAs, 22 tRNAs, and 13 subunits of the electron transport chain (reviewed by [137]) and was proposed to lack histones [182]. In 2011, Shock et al. identified translocation of nuclear DNMT1 to the mitochondrial matrix, regulated by a mitochondria targeting sequence [183], with translocation sensitive to overexpression of activators that respond to oxidative stress. Alterations in mtDNMT1 directly affected transcription from the light and heavy strands of mtDNA, suggesting epigenetic regulation of the mitochondrial genome [183]. Further studies have identified methylated cytosines within the control region of mtDNA [184], along with the existence of histones within the mitochondrial membrane [185].

Nuclear encoded genes contribute the majority of proteins required for mitochondrial regulation, and it is likely that others will be identified with roles in regulating mitochondrial epigenetics. The reciprocal relationship between the nucleus and mitochondria, both of which are responsive to changes in mitochondrial activity, and therefore nutrient availability, has implications for development, aging, and disease (reviewed by [186]). To this end, the sensitivity of the mitochondrial epigenome to changes in pluripotent, or differentiating, cell metabolism has not been studied. However, the significance of the dynamic nature, and apparent plasticity, of cellular metabolism is that a suboptimal nutrient environment is compensated metabolically, and a changed metabolism will result in a misregulated nuclear, and mitochondrial, epigenome. The impact of this may not be apparent in the pluripotent cell but is plausibly manifested in differentiated progeny through inheritance of aberrant epigenetic marks, modifying the expression of genes involved in signalling, growth and differentiation, and metabolism. While sufficient perturbation may be lethal, studies on the impact of embryo culture imply that cell plasticity enables ongoing development and differentiation. However, these compensatory changes likely establish lower cellular stress/environmental tolerance, manifest as susceptibility to disease. Hence, the environment in which a cell is grown becomes a critical regulator and determinant of cell fate.

12. Conclusions

The convention that metabolites are simply required for energy production is placed into a new context, in which metabolites are central to modifications of the epigenetic landscape, and a novel model explaining the previously unexplored phenomenon of human ESC mitochondrial morphology and localisation is presented. The mitochondrial signalling axis, possibly unique to highly proliferative cell types such as stem cells and the embryo, attempts to explain a hitherto undescribed facet of ESC metabolism in which numerous, vacuolated, perinuclear mitochondria may induce a H2O2-rich nuclear environment stimulating proliferation through HIF activity, a process that is plausibly facilitated by physiological oxygen. As metabolism and epigenetics intersect, metabolite and cofactor availability is hypothesised to have a significant impact on the chromatin landscape leading to persistent changes carried through lineage commitment. Pivotal studies in embryonic stem cells have established that oxygen, through its impact on metabolism and key transcription factors, modulates stem cell pluripotency and differentiation. Oxygen, as a nutrient in culture, is a signalling molecule capable of directing lineage decisions and remodelling metabolism. When used at the correct stage during in vitro development, and at the correct concentration, mimicking in vivo physiology, oxygen can exert significant selective pressures, generating larger numbers of more homogeneous populations. Metabolic pathway flux, encompassing fundamental metabolic pathway activity and network interaction, metabolic intermediate production, and ROS generation, therefore integrates nutrient availability with cell signalling and the epigenome. Consequently, the formulation of culture media has significant implications for stem cell maintenance, cell fate, and plausibly subsequent cell health and function.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. J. L. Meier, “Metabolic mechanisms of epigenetic regulation,” ACS Chemical Biology, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 2607–2621, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. B. S. N. Tan, A. Lonic, M. B. Morris, P. D. Rathjen, and J. Rathjen, “The amino acid transporter SNAT2 mediates L-proline-induced differentiation of ES cells,” American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology, vol. 300, no. 6, pp. C1270–C1279, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  3. P. Yang, W.-b. Shen, E. A. Reece, X. Chen, and P. Yang, “High glucose suppresses embryonic stem cell differentiation into neural lineage cells,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 472, no. 2, pp. 306–312, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. N. Shiraki, Y. Shiraki, T. Tsuyama et al., “Methionine metabolism regulates maintenance and differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 780–794, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. N. Shyh-Chang, J. W. Locasale, C. A. Lyssiotis et al., “Influence of threonine metabolism on S-adenosylmethionine and histone methylation,” Science, vol. 339, no. 6116, pp. 222–226, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. D. K. Gardner, “Changes in requirements and utilization of nutrients during mammalian preimplantation embryo development and their significance in embryo culture,” Theriogenology, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 83–102, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. P. L. Wale and D. K. Gardner, “Oxygen affects the ability of mouse blastocysts to regulate ammonium,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 89, no. 3, p. 75, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. P. L. Wale and D. K. Gardner, “Oxygen regulates amino acid turnover and carbohydrate uptake during the preimplantation period of mouse embryo development,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  9. P. L. Wale and D. K. Gardner, “Time-lapse analysis of mouse embryo development in oxygen gradients,” Reproductive Biomedicine Online, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 402–410, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. H. Zhang, M. G. Badur, A. S. Divakaruni et al., “Distinct metabolic states can support self-renewal and lipogenesis in human pluripotent stem cells under different culture conditions,” Cell Reports, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1536–1547, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. J. G. Lees, J. Rathjen, J. R. Sheedy, D. K. Gardner, and A. J. Harvey, “Distinct profiles of human embryonic stem cell metabolism and mitochondria identified by oxygen,” Reproduction, vol. 150, no. 4, pp. 367–382, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. L. Weinberger, M. Ayyash, N. Novershtern, and J. H. Hanna, “Dynamic stem cell states: naive to primed pluripotency in rodents and humans,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 155–169, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. J. Nichols and A. Smith, “Pluripotency in the embryo and in culture,” Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, vol. 4, no. 8, article a008128, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. D. James, A. J. Levine, D. Besser, and A. Hemmati-Brivanlou, “TGFβ/activin/nodal signaling is necessary for the maintenance of pluripotency in human embryonic stem cells,” Development, vol. 132, no. 6, pp. 1273–1282, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. L. Vallier, M. Alexander, and R. A. Pedersen, “Activin/nodal and FGF pathways cooperate to maintain pluripotency of human embryonic stem cells,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 118, no. 19, pp. 4495–4509, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. G. Martello and A. Smith, “The nature of embryonic stem cells,” Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 647–675, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. T. Chen and S. Y. Dent, “Chromatin modifiers and remodellers: regulators of cellular differentiation,” Nature Reviews Genetics, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 93–106, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. J. Boland, K. L. Nazor, and J. F. Loring, “Epigenetic regulation of pluripotency and differentiation,” Circulation Research, vol. 115, no. 2, pp. 311–324, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. S. Efroni, R. Duttagupta, J. Cheng et al., “Global transcription in pluripotent embryonic stem cells,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 437–447, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. B. E. Bernstein, T. S. Mikkelsen, X. Xie et al., “A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells,” Cell, vol. 125, no. 2, pp. 315–326, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. P. Voigt, W.-W. Tee, and D. Reinberg, “A double take on bivalent promoters,” Genes & Development, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 1318–1338, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. R. D. Hawkins, G. C. Hon, L. K. Lee et al., “Distinct epigenomic landscapes of pluripotent and lineage-committed human cells,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 479–491, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. H. Wu and Y. Zhang, “Reversing DNA methylation: mechanisms, genomics, and biological functions,” Cell, vol. 156, no. 1, pp. 45–68, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  24. D. R. Donohoe and S. J. Bultman, “Metaboloepigenetics: interrelationships between energy metabolism and epigenetic control of gene expression,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 227, no. 9, pp. 3169–3177, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. A. J. Harvey, J. Rathjen, and D. K. Gardner, “Metaboloepigenetic regulation of pluripotent stem cells,” Stem Cells International, vol. 2016, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  26. M. Xiao, H. Yang, W. Xu et al., “Inhibition of α-KG-dependent histone and DNA demethylases by fumarate and succinate that are accumulated in mutations of FH and SDH tumor suppressors,” Genes & Development, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 1326–1338, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. E. Seto and M. Yoshida, “Erasers of histone acetylation: the histone deacetylase enzymes,” Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, vol. 6, no. 4, article a018713, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. W. Zhou, M. Choi, D. Margineantu et al., “HIF1alpha induced switch from bivalent to exclusively glycolytic metabolism during ESC-to-EpiSC/hESC transition,” EMBO Journal, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 2103–2116, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. H. Sperber, J. Mathieu, Y. Wang et al., “The metabolome regulates the epigenetic landscape during naive-to-primed human embryonic stem cell transition,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 1523–1535, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. S. Varum, A. S. Rodrigues, M. B. Moura et al., “Energy metabolism in human pluripotent stem cells and their differentiated counterparts,” PloS One, vol. 6, no. 6, article e20914, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. C. B. Ware, A. M. Nelson, B. Mecham et al., “Derivation of naive human embryonic stem cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 111, no. 12, pp. 4484–4489, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. T. W. Theunissen, B. E. Powell, H. Wang et al., “Systematic identification of culture conditions for induction and maintenance of naive human pluripotency,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 471–487, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. Y. Takashima, G. Guo, R. Loos et al., “Resetting transcription factor control circuitry toward ground-state pluripotency in human,” Cell, vol. 158, no. 6, pp. 1254–1269, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. Y.-S. Chan, J. Göke, J.-H. Ng et al., “Induction of a human pluripotent state with distinct regulatory circuitry that resembles preimplantation epiblast,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 663–675, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. O. Gafni, L. Weinberger, A. A. Mansour et al., “Derivation of novel human ground state naive pluripotent stem cells,” Nature, vol. 504, no. 7479, pp. 282–286, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. W. Gu, X. Gaeta, A. Sahakyan et al., “Glycolytic metabolism plays a functional role in regulating human pluripotent stem cell state,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 476–490, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. J. Aguilar and M. Reyley, “The uterine tubal fluid: secretion, composition and biological effects,” Animal Reproduction, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 91–105, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  38. H. Leese, “The formation and function of oviduct fluid,” Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 843–856, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. R. Hunter, “Components of oviduct physiology in eutherian mammals,” Biological Reviews, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 244–255, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. D. K. Gardner, M. Lane, I. Calderon, and J. Leeton, “Environment of the preimplantation human embryo in vivo: metabolite analysis of oviduct and uterine fluids and metabolism of cumulus cells,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 349–353, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. A. Carreau, B. E. Hafny-Rahbi, A. Matejuk, C. Grillon, and C. Kieda, “Why is the partial oxygen pressure of human tissues a crucial parameter? Small molecules and hypoxia,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1239–1253, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. B. Fischer and B. D. Bavister, “Oxygen tension in the oviduct and uterus of rhesus monkeys, hamsters and rabbits,” Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 673–679, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. J. Mitchell and J. Yochim, “Measurement of intrauterine oxygen tension in the rat and its regulation by ovarian steroid hormones,” Endocrinology, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 691–700, 1968. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. D. H. Maas, B. T. Storey, and L. Mastroianni, “Oxygen tension in the oviduct of the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta),” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 1312–1317, 1976. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. F. Rodesch, P. Simon, C. Donner, and E. Jauniaux, “Oxygen measurements in endometrial and trophoblastic tissues during early pregnancy,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 283–285, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  46. A. Clark, Y. Stokes, M. Lane, and J. Thompson, “Mathematical modelling of oxygen concentration in bovine and murine cumulus–oocyte complexes,” Reproduction, vol. 131, no. 6, pp. 999–1006, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. M. S. Christianson, Y. Zhao, G. Shoham et al., “Embryo catheter loading and embryo culture techniques: results of a worldwide web-based survey,” Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 1029–1036, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. M. Lane and D. K. Gardner, “Understanding cellular disruptions during early embryo development that perturb viability and fetal development,” Reproduction, Fertility and Development, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 371–378, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. P. L. Wale and D. K. Gardner, “The effects of chemical and physical factors on mammalian embryo culture and their importance for the practice of assisted human reproduction,” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 2–22, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  50. D. K. Gardner and M. Lane, “Ex vivo early embryo development and effects on gene expression and imprinting,” Reproduction, Fertility and Development, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 361–370, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. D. K. Gardner, M. Meseguer, C. Rubio, and N. R. Treff, “Diagnosis of human preimplantation embryo viability,” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 727–747, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. D. K. Gardner, R. Hamilton, B. McCallie, W. B. Schoolcraft, and M. G. Katz-Jaffe, “Human and mouse embryonic development, metabolism and gene expression are altered by an ammonium gradient in vitro,” Reproduction, vol. 146, no. 1, pp. 49–61, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. D. K. Gardner and A. J. Harvey, “Blastocyst metabolism,” Reproduction, Fertility and Development, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 638–654, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. H. D. Morgan, F. Santos, K. Green, W. Dean, and W. Reik, “Epigenetic reprogramming in mammals,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 14, Supplement 1, pp. R47–R58, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  55. D. K. Gardner, “Development of serum-free media for the culture and transfer of human blastocysts,” Human Reproduction, vol. 13, Supplement 4, no. 3, pp. 218–225, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  56. D. K. Gardner and M. Lane, “Amino acids and ammonium regulate mouse embryo development in culture,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 377–385, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. M. Lane and D. K. Gardner, “Amino acids and vitamins prevent culture-induced metabolic perturbations and associated loss of viability of mouse blastocysts,” Human Reproduction, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 991–997, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. J. G. Thompson, A. C. Simpson, P. A. Pugh, P. E. Donnelly, and H. R. Tervit, “Effect of oxygen concentration on in-vitro development of preimplantation sheep and cattle embryos,” Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 573–578, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. P. Quinn and G. M. Harlow, “The effect of oxygen on the development of preimplantation mouse embryos in vitro,” Journal of Experimental Zoology, vol. 206, no. 1, pp. 73–80, 1978. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. L. Karagenc, Z. Sertkaya, N. Ciray, U. Ulug, and M. Bahceci, “Impact of oxygen concentration on embryonic development of mouse zygotes,” Reproductive Biomedicine Online, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 409–417, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. A. J. Harvey, “The role of oxygen in ruminant preimplantation embryo development and metabolism,” Animal Reproduction Science, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 113–128, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  62. D. K. Gardner, “The impact of physiological oxygen during culture, and vitrification for cryopreservation, on the outcome of extended culture in human IVF,” Reproductive Biomedicine Online, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 137–141, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. K. Kirkegaard, J. J. Hindkjaer, and H. J. Ingerslev, “Effect of oxygen concentration on human embryo development evaluated by time-lapse monitoring,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 738–744, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. A. J. Harvey, K. L. Kind, M. Pantaleon, D. T. Armstrong, and J. G. Thompson, “Oxygen-regulated gene expression in bovine blastocysts,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 1108–1119, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. P. F. Rinaudo, G. Giritharan, S. Talbi, A. T. Dobson, and R. M. Schultz, “Effects of oxygen tension on gene expression in preimplantation mouse embryos,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 1265. e1–1265. e36, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  66. M. G. Katz-Jaffe, D. W. Linck, W. B. Schoolcraft, and D. K. Gardner, “A proteomic analysis of mammalian preimplantation embryonic development,” Reproduction, vol. 130, no. 6, pp. 899–905, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. D. A. Gook, D. Edgar, K. Lewis, J. Sheedy, and D. Gardner, “Impact of oxygen concentration on adult murine pre-antral follicle development in vitro and the corresponding metabolic profile,” Molecular Human Reproduction, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 31–41, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  68. M. Meintjes, S. J. Chantilis, J. D. Douglas et al., “A controlled randomized trial evaluating the effect of lowered incubator oxygen tension on live births in a predominantly blastocyst transfer program†,” Human Reproduction, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 300–307, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. U. Waldenström, A.-B. Engström, D. Hellberg, and S. Nilsson, “Low-oxygen compared with high-oxygen atmosphere in blastocyst culture, a prospective randomized study,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 91, no. 6, pp. 2461–2465, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. C. Marcho, W. Cui, and J. Mager, “Epigenetic dynamics during preimplantation development,” Reproduction, vol. 150, no. 3, pp. 109–120, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  71. J. Biggers, D. Whittingham, and R. Donahue, “The pattern of energy metabolism in the mouse oöcyte and zygote,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 560–567, 1967. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. F. D. Houghton, J. G. Thompson, C. J. Kennedy, and H. J. Leese, “Oxygen consumption and energy metabolism of the early mouse embryo,” Molecular Reproduction and Development, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 476–485, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. L. C. Hewitson and H. J. Leese, “Energy metabolism of the trophectoderm and inner cell mass of the mouse blastocyst,” Journal of Experimental Zoology Part a: Ecological Genetics and Physiology, vol. 267, no. 3, pp. 337–343, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. D. Gardner and H. Leese, “Concentrations of nutrients in mouse oviduct fluid and their effects on embryo development and metabolism in vitro,” Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 361–368, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. C. D. Folmes, T. J. Nelson, A. Martinez-Fernandez et al., “Somatic oxidative bioenergetics transitions into pluripotency-dependent glycolysis to facilitate nuclear reprogramming,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 264–271, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. H. Kondoh, M. E. Lleonart, Y. Nakashima et al., “A high glycolytic flux supports the proliferative potential of murine embryonic stem cells,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 293–299, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. A. J. Harvey, J. Rathjen, L. J. Yu, and D. K. Gardner, “Oxygen modulates human embryonic stem cell metabolism in the absence of changes in self-renewal,” Reproduction, Fertility and Development, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 446–458, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  78. J. Rathjen, C. Yeo, C. Yap, B. S. N. Tan, P. D. Rathjen, and D. K. Gardner, “Culture environment regulates amino acid turnover and glucose utilisation in human ES cells,” Reproduction, Fertility and Development, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 703–716, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. T. Pfeiffer, S. Schuster, and S. Bonhoeffer, “Cooperation and competition in the evolution of ATP-producing pathways,” Science, vol. 292, no. 5516, pp. 504–507, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. E. A. Newsholme, B. Crabtree, and M. S. Ardawi, “The role of high rates of glycolysis and glutamine utilization in rapidly dividing cells,” Bioscience Reports, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 393–400, 1985. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. G. Hatzivassiliou, F. Zhao, D. E. Bauer et al., “ATP citrate lyase inhibition can suppress tumor cell growth,” Cancer Cell, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 311–321, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. K. E. Wellen, C. Lu, A. Mancuso et al., “The hexosamine biosynthetic pathway couples growth factor-induced glutamine uptake to glucose metabolism,” Genes & Development, vol. 24, no. 24, pp. 2784–2799, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. B. W. Carey, L. W. Finley, J. R. Cross, C. D. Allis, and C. B. Thompson, “Intracellular [agr]-ketoglutarate maintains the pluripotency of embryonic stem cells,” Nature, vol. 518, no. 7539, pp. 413–416, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. J. Zhang, I. Khvorostov, J. S. Hong et al., “UCP2 regulates energy metabolism and differentiation potential of human pluripotent stem cells,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 30, no. 24, pp. 4860–4873, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. S. Tohyama, J. Fujita, T. Hishiki et al., “Glutamine oxidation is indispensable for survival of human pluripotent stem cells,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 663–674, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. N. M. Vacanti, A. S. Divakaruni, C. R. Green et al., “Regulation of substrate utilization by the mitochondrial pyruvate carrier,” Molecular Cell, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 425–435, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. C. Yang, B. Ko, C. T. Hensley et al., “Glutamine oxidation maintains the TCA cycle and cell survival during impaired mitochondrial pyruvate transport,” Molecular Cell, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 414–424, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. A. Moussaieff, M. Rouleau, D. Kitsberg et al., “Glycolysis-mediated changes in acetyl-CoA and histone acetylation control the early differentiation of embryonic stem cells,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 392–402, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. M. J. Birket, A. L. Orr, A. A. Gerencser et al., “A reduction in ATP demand and mitochondrial activity with neural differentiation of human embryonic stem cells,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 124, no. 3, pp. 348–358, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. A. Prigione and J. Adjaye, “Modulation of mitochondrial biogenesis and bioenergetic metabolism upon in vitro and in vivo differentiation of human ES and iPS cells,” International Journal of Developmental Biology, vol. 54, no. 11-12, pp. 1729–1741, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. T. G. Fernandes, M. M. Diogo, A. Fernandes-Platzgummer, C. L. da Silva, and J. M. Cabral, “Different stages of pluripotency determine distinct patterns of proliferation, metabolism, and lineage commitment of embryonic stem cells under hypoxia,” Stem Cell Research, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 76–89, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. R. J. DeBerardinis, A. Mancuso, E. Daikhin et al., “Beyond aerobic glycolysis: transformed cells can engage in glutamine metabolism that exceeds the requirement for protein and nucleotide synthesis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 104, no. 49, pp. 19345–19350, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. J. Turner, L.-E. Quek, D. Titmarsh et al., “Metabolic profiling and flux analysis of MEL-2 human embryonic stem cells during exponential growth at physiological and atmospheric oxygen concentrations,” PloS One, vol. 9, no. 11, article e112757, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. G. Marsboom, G.-F. Zhang, N. Pohl-Avila et al., “Glutamine metabolism regulates the pluripotency transcription factor OCT4,” Cell Reports, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 323–332, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. J. M. Washington, J. Rathjen, F. Felquer et al., “L-proline induces differentiation of ES cells: a novel role for an amino acid in the regulation of pluripotent cells in culture,” American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology, vol. 298, no. 5, pp. 982–992, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  96. L. Casalino, S. Comes, G. Lambazzi et al., “Control of embryonic stem cell metastability by L-proline catabolism,” Journal of Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 108–122, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  97. S. Comes, M. Gagliardi, N. Laprano et al., “L-proline induces a mesenchymal-like invasive program in embryonic stem cells by remodeling H3K9 and H3K36 methylation,” Stem Cell Reports, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 307–321, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. I. Hiratani, T. Ryba, M. Itoh et al., “Genome-wide dynamics of replication timing revealed by in vitro models of mouse embryogenesis,” Genome Research, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 155–169, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. J. Wang, P. Alexander, L. Wu, R. Hammer, O. Cleaver, and S. L. McKnight, “Dependence of mouse embryonic stem cells on threonine catabolism,” Science, vol. 325, no. 5939, pp. 435–439, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. T. TeSlaa, A. C. Chaikovsky, I. Lipchina, S. L. Escobar, K. Hochedlinger, and J. Huang, “A-ketoglutarate accelerates the initial differentiation of primed human pluripotent stem cells,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  101. S. Tohyama, F. Hattori, M. Sano et al., “Distinct metabolic flow enables large-scale purification of mouse and human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 127–137, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  102. F. Hattori, H. Chen, H. Yamashita et al., “Nongenetic method for purifying stem cell–derived cardiomyocytes,” Nature Methods, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 61–66, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  103. H. Barbosa, T. G. Fernandes, T. P. Dias, M. M. Diogo, and J. Cabral, “New insights into the mechanisms of embryonic stem cell self-renewal under hypoxia: a multifactorial analysis approach,” PloS One, vol. 7, no. 6, article e38963, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  104. T. Ezashi, P. Das, and R. M. Roberts, “Low O2 tensions and the prevention of differentiation of hES cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 13, pp. 4783–4788, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  105. C. E. Forristal, K. L. Wright, N. A. Hanley, R. O. Oreffo, and F. D. Houghton, “Hypoxia inducible factors regulate pluripotency and proliferation in human embryonic stem cells cultured at reduced oxygen tensions,” Reproduction, vol. 139, no. 1, pp. 85–97, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  106. V. Zachar, S. M. Prasad, S. C. Weli et al., “The effect of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) long-term normoxic and hypoxic cultures on the maintenance of pluripotency,” In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology-Animal, vol. 46, no. 3-4, pp. 276–283, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  107. N. R. Forsyth, A. Musio, P. Vezzoni, A. H. Simpson, B. S. Noble, and J. McWhir, “Physiologic oxygen enhances human embryonic stem cell clonal recovery and reduces chromosomal abnormalities,” Cloning and Stem Cells, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 16–23, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  108. P. Xie, Y. Sun, Q. Ouyang et al., “Physiological oxygen prevents frequent silencing of the DLK1-DIO3 cluster during human embryonic stem cells culture,” Stem Cells, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 391–401, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  109. R. Petruzzelli, D. R. Christensen, K. L. Parry, T. Sanchez-Elsner, and F. D. Houghton, “HIF-2α regulates NANOG expression in human embryonic stem cells following hypoxia and reoxygenation through the interaction with an Oct-sox cis regulatory element,” PloS One, vol. 9, no. 10, article e108309, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  110. C. J. Lengner, A. A. Gimelbrant, J. A. Erwin et al., “Derivation of pre-X inactivation human embryonic stem cells under physiological oxygen concentrations,” Cell, vol. 141, no. 5, pp. 872–883, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  111. J. Gibbons, E. Hewitt, and D. K. Gardner, “Effects of oxygen tension on the establishment and lactate dehydrogenase activity of murine embryonic stem cells,” Cloning and Stem Cells, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 117–122, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  112. T. T. Peura, A. Bosman, and T. Stojanov, “Derivation of human embryonic stem cell lines,” Theriogenology, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 32–42, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  113. H.-F. Chen, H.-C. Kuo, S.-P. Lin, C.-L. Chien, M.-S. Chiang, and H.-N. Ho, “Hypoxic culture maintains self-renewal and enhances embryoid body formation of human embryonic stem cells,” Tissue Engineering Part A, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 2901–2913, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  114. K. Fynes, R. Tostoes, L. Ruban, B. Weil, C. Mason, and F. S. Veraitch, “The differential effects of 2% oxygen preconditioning on the subsequent differentiation of mouse and human pluripotent stem cells,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 23, no. 16, pp. 1910–1922, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  115. S. M. Prasad, M. Czepiel, C. Cetinkaya et al., “Continuous hypoxic culturing maintains activation of notch and allows long-term propagation of human embryonic stem cells without spontaneous differentiation,” Cell Proliferation, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 63–74, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  116. S. D. Westfall, S. Sachdev, P. Das et al., “Identification of oxygen-sensitive transcriptional programs in human embryonic stem cells,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 869–881, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  117. P. Cahan and G. Q. Daley, “Origins and implications of pluripotent stem cell variability and heterogeneity,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 357–368, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  118. International Stem Cells Initiative, O. Adewumi, B. Aflatoonian et al., “Characterization of human embryonic stem cell lines by the International Stem Cell Initiative,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 803–816, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  119. Q. Wu and X. Ni, “ROS-mediated DNA methylation pattern alterations in carcinogenesis,” Current Drug Targets, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 13–19, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  120. T. Takehara, T. Teramura, Y. Onodera, C. Hamanishi, and K. Fukuda, “Reduced oxygen concentration enhances conversion of embryonic stem cells to epiblast stem cells,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 1239–1249, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  121. D. Bae, P. Mondragon-Teran, D. Hernandez et al., “Hypoxia enhances the generation of retinal progenitor cells from human induced pluripotent and embryonic stem cells,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 1344–1355, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  122. P. Y. Baranov, B. A. Tucker, and M. J. Young, “Low-oxygen culture conditions extend the multipotent properties of human retinal progenitor cells,” Tissue Engineering Part A, vol. 20, no. 9-10, pp. 1465–1475, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  123. M. Garita-HernÁndez, F. Diaz-Corrales, D. Lukovic et al., “Hypoxia increases the yield of photoreceptors differentiating from mouse embryonic stem cells and improves the modeling of retinogenesis in vitro,” Stem Cells, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 966–978, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  124. S. Kusuma, E. Peijnenburg, P. Patel, and S. Gerecht, “Low oxygen tension enhances endothelial fate of human pluripotent stem cells,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 913–920, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  125. P. Mondragon-Teran, J. Z. Baboo, C. Mason, G. J. Lye, and F. S. Veraitch, “The full spectrum of physiological oxygen tensions and step-changes in oxygen tension affects the neural differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells,” Biotechnology Progress, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 1700–1708, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  126. P. Pimton, S. Lecht, C. T. Stabler, G. Johannes, E. S. Schulman, and P. I. Lelkes, “Hypoxia enhances differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells into definitive endoderm and distal lung cells,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 663–676, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  127. P. W. Burridge, S. Thompson, M. A. Millrod et al., “A universal system for highly efficient cardiac differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells that eliminates interline variability,” PloS One, vol. 6, no. 4, article e18293, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  128. C. E. Forristal, D. R. Christensen, F. E. Chinnery et al., “Environmental oxygen tension regulates the energy metabolism and self-renewal of human embryonic stem cells,” PloS One, vol. 8, no. 5, article e62507, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  129. J. I. Piruat and J. Lopez-Barneo, “Oxygen tension regulates mitochondrial DNA-encoded complex I gene expression,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 52, pp. 42676–42684, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  130. H. Kumar and D.-K. Choi, “Hypoxia inducible factor pathway and physiological adaptation: a cell survival pathway?” Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 2015, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  131. B.-H. Jiang, G. L. Semenza, C. Bauer, and H. H. Marti, “Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 levels vary exponentially over a physiologically relevant range of O2 tension,” American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology, vol. 271, no. 4, pp. 1172–1180, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  132. C. Frezza, L. Zheng, D. A. Tennant et al., “Metabolic profiling of hypoxic cells revealed a catabolic signature required for cell survival,” PloS One, vol. 6, no. 9, article e24411, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  133. T. J. Collins, M. J. Berridge, P. Lipp, and M. D. Bootman, “Mitochondria are morphologically and functionally heterogeneous within cells,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 1616–1627, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  134. B. D. Bavister and J. M. Squirrell, “Mitochondrial distribution and function in oocytes and early embryos,” Human Reproduction, vol. 15, Supplement 2, pp. 189–198, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  135. A. H. Sathananthan and A. Trounson, “Mitochondrial morphology during preimplantational human embryogenesis,” Human Reproduction, vol. 15, Supplement 2, pp. 148–159, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  136. P. M. Motta, S. A. Nottola, S. Makabe, and R. Heyn, “Mitochondrial morphology in human fetal and adult female germ cells,” Human Reproduction, vol. 15, Supplement 2, pp. 129–147, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  137. A. Harvey, T. Gibson, T. Lonergan, and C. Brenner, “Dynamic regulation of mitochondrial function in preimplantation embryos and embryonic stem cells,” Mitochondrion, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 829–838, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  138. J. Squirrell, R. Schramm, A. Paprocki, D. Wokosin, and B. Bavister, “Imaging mitochondrial organization in living primate oocytes and embryos using multiphoton microscopy,” Microscopy and Microanalysis, vol. 9, no. 03, pp. 190–201, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  139. L. R. Mohr and A. Trounson, “Comparative ultrastructure of hatched human, mouse and bovine blastocysts,” Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 499–504, 1982. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  140. H. Sathananthan, S. Gunasheela, and J. Menezes, “Mechanics of human blastocyst hatching in vitro,” Reproductive Biomedicine Online, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 228–234, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  141. M. Nadijcka and N. Hillman, “Ultrastructural studies of the mouse blastocyst substages,” Development, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 675–695, 1974. View at: Google Scholar
  142. Y. M. Cho, S. Kwon, Y. K. Pak et al., “Dynamic changes in mitochondrial biogenesis and antioxidant enzymes during the spontaneous differentiation of human embryonic stem cells,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 348, no. 4, pp. 1472–1478, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  143. J. C. S. John, J. Ramalho-Santos, H. L. Gray et al., “The expression of mitochondrial DNA transcription factors during early cardiomyocyte in vitro differentiation from human embryonic stem cells,” Cloning and Stem Cells, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 141–153, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  144. L. Armstrong, K. Tilgner, G. Saretzki et al., “Human induced pluripotent stem cell lines show stress defense mechanisms and mitochondrial regulation similar to those of human embryonic stem cells,” Stem Cells, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 661–673, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  145. J. M. Facucho-Oliveira, J. Alderson, E. C. Spikings, S. Egginton, and J. C. S. John, “Mitochondrial DNA replication during differentiation of murine embryonic stem cells,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 120, no. 22, pp. 4025–4034, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  146. L. C. O'Brien, P. M. Keeney, and J. P. Bennett Jr, “Differentiation of human neural stem cells into motor neurons stimulates mitochondrial biogenesis and decreases glycolytic flux,” Stem Cells and Development, vol. 24, no. 17, pp. 1984–1994, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  147. M. Son, Y. Kwon, M. Son et al., “Mitofusins deficiency elicits mitochondrial metabolic reprogramming to pluripotency,” Cell Death and Differentiation, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 1957–1969, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  148. S. Mandal, A. G. Lindgren, A. S. Srivastava, A. T. Clark, and U. Banerjee, “Mitochondrial function controls proliferation and early differentiation potential of embryonic stem cells,” Stem Cells, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 486–495, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  149. S. Varum, O. Momcilovic, C. Castro, A. Ben-Yehudah, J. Ramalho-Santos, and C. S. Navara, “Enhancement of human embryonic stem cell pluripotency through inhibition of the mitochondrial respiratory chain,” Stem Cell Research, vol. 3, no. 2-3, pp. 142–156, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  150. L. R. Todd, M. N. Damin, R. Gomathinayagam, S. R. Horn, A. R. Means, and U. Sankar, “Growth factor erv1-like modulates Drp1 to preserve mitochondrial dynamics and function in mouse embryonic stem cells,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 1225–1236, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  151. R. H. Hämäläinen, K. J. Ahlqvist, P. Ellonen et al., “mtDNA mutagenesis disrupts pluripotent stem cell function by altering redox signaling,” Cell Reports, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 1614–1624, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  152. N. S. Chandel, “Mitochondria as signaling organelles,” BMC Biology, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 34, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  153. Y. Kuroda, T. Mitsui, M. Kunishige et al., “Parkin enhances mitochondrial biogenesis in proliferating cells,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 883–895, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  154. M. C. Caino, J. C. Ghosh, Y. C. Chae et al., “PI3K therapy reprograms mitochondrial trafficking to fuel tumor cell invasion,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 112, no. 28, pp. 8638–8643, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  155. M. Lam, N. L. Oleinick, and A.-L. Nieminen, “Photodynamic therapy-induced apoptosis in epidermoid carcinoma cells reactive oxygen species and mitochondrial inner membrane permeabilization,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 276, no. 50, pp. 47379–47386, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  156. X. Li, Y. Jiang, J. Meisenhelder et al., “Mitochondria-translocated PGK1 functions as a protein kinase to coordinate glycolysis and the TCA cycle in tumorigenesis,” Molecular Cell, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 705–719, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  157. L. Wang, Y. Liu, W. Li et al., “Selective targeting of gold nanorods at the mitochondria of cancer cells: implications for cancer therapy,” Nano Letters, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 772–780, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  158. A. Harvey, J. Rathjen, and D. K. Gardner, “The metabolic framework of pluripotent stem cells and potential mechanisms of regulation,” in Stem Cells in Reproductive Medicine: Basic Science and Therapeutic Potential, C. Simón, A. Pellicer, and R. R. Pera, Eds., pp. 164–179, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  159. T. Lonergan, B. Bavister, and C. Brenner, “Mitochondria in stem cells,” Mitochondrion, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 289–296, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  160. E. L. Bell, T. A. Klimova, J. Eisenbart et al., “The Qo site of the mitochondrial complex III is required for the transduction of hypoxic signaling via reactive oxygen species production,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 177, no. 6, pp. 1029–1036, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  161. R. D. Guzy, B. Hoyos, E. Robin et al., “Mitochondrial complex III is required for hypoxia-induced ROS production and cellular oxygen sensing,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 401–408, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  162. R. B. Hamanaka and N. S. Chandel, “Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species regulate cellular signaling and dictate biological outcomes,” Trends in Biochemical Sciences, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 505–513, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  163. L. Diebold and N. S. Chandel, “Mitochondrial ROS regulation of proliferating cells,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 86–93, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  164. J. E. Le Belle, N. M. Orozco, A. A. Paucar et al., “Proliferative neural stem cells have high endogenous ROS levels that regulate self-renewal and neurogenesis in a PI3K/Akt-dependant manner,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 59–71, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  165. M. Yoneyama, K. Kawada, Y. Gotoh, T. Shiba, and K. Ogita, “Endogenous reactive oxygen species are essential for proliferation of neural stem/progenitor cells,” Neurochemistry International, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 740–746, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  166. A.-B. Al-Mehdi, V. M. Pastukh, B. M. Swiger et al., “Perinuclear mitochondrial clustering creates an oxidant-rich nuclear domain required for hypoxia-induced transcription,” Science Signaling, vol. 5, no. 231, p. 47, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  167. E. C. Ferber, B. Peck, O. Delpuech, G. P. Bell, P. East, and A. Schulze, “FOXO3a regulates reactive oxygen metabolism by inhibiting mitochondrial gene expression,” Cell Death and Differentiation, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 968–979, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  168. J. K. Brunelle, E. L. Bell, N. M. Quesada et al., “Oxygen sensing requires mitochondrial ROS but not oxidative phosphorylation,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 409–414, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  169. A. L. Orr, L. Vargas, C. N. Turk et al., “Suppressors of superoxide production from mitochondrial complex III,” Nature Chemical Biology, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 834–836, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  170. D. A. Patten, V. N. Lafleur, G. A. Robitaille, D. A. Chan, A. J. Giaccia, and D. E. Richard, “Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 activation in nonhypoxic conditions: the essential role of mitochondrial-derived reactive oxygen species,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 21, no. 18, pp. 3247–3257, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  171. J. Mathieu, Z. Zhang, W. Zhou et al., “HIF induces human embryonic stem cell markers in cancer cells,” Cancer Research, vol. 71, no. 13, pp. 4640–4652, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  172. K. L. Covello, J. Kehler, H. Yu et al., “HIF-2α regulates Oct-4: effects of hypoxia on stem cell function, embryonic development, and tumor growth,” Genes & Development, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 557–570, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  173. B. Dannenmann, S. Lehle, D. G. Hildebrand et al., “High glutathione and glutathione peroxidase-2 levels mediate cell-type-specific DNA damage protection in human induced pluripotent stem cells,” Stem Cell Reports, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 886–898, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  174. G. Saretzki, T. Walter, S. Atkinson et al., “Downregulation of multiple stress defense mechanisms during differentiation of human embryonic stem cells,” Stem Cells, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 455–464, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  175. B. Das, R. Bayat-Mokhtari, M. Tsui et al., “HIF-2α suppresses p53 to enhance the stemness and regenerative potential of human embryonic stem cells,” Stem Cells, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 1685–1695, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  176. G. B. Waypa, J. D. Marks, R. Guzy et al., “Hypoxia triggers subcellular compartmental redox signaling in vascular smooth muscle cells,” Circulation Research, vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 526–535, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  177. N. Chandel, E. Maltepe, E. Goldwasser, C. Mathieu, M. Simon, and P. Schumacker, “Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species trigger hypoxia-induced transcription,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 95, no. 20, pp. 11715–11720, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  178. M. J. Hitchler and F. E. Domann, “Metabolic defects provide a spark for the epigenetic switch in cancer,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 115–127, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  179. V. Valinluck and L. C. Sowers, “Endogenous cytosine damage products alter the site selectivity of human DNA maintenance methyltransferase DNMT1,” Cancer Research, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 946–950, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  180. S.-O. Lim, J.-M. Gu, M. S. Kim et al., “Epigenetic changes induced by reactive oxygen species in hepatocellular carcinoma: methylation of the E-cadherin promoter,” Gastroenterology, vol. 135, no. 6, pp. 2128–2140, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  181. D. C. Wallace and W. Fan, “Energetics, epigenetics, mitochondrial genetics,” Mitochondrion, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 12–31, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  182. B. N. Ames, M. K. Shigenaga, and T. M. Hagen, “Oxidants, antioxidants, and the degenerative diseases of aging,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 90, no. 17, pp. 7915–7922, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  183. L. S. Shock, P. V. Thakkar, E. J. Peterson, R. G. Moran, and S. M. Taylor, “DNA methyltransferase 1, cytosine methylation, and cytosine hydroxymethylation in mammalian mitochondria,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 108, no. 9, pp. 3630–3635, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  184. D. Bellizzi, P. D'Aquila, T. Scafone et al., “The control region of mitochondrial DNA shows an unusual CpG and non-CpG methylation pattern,” DNA Research, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 537–547, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  185. Y.-S. Choi, J. H. Jeong, H.-K. Min et al., “Shot-gun proteomic analysis of mitochondrial D-loop DNA binding proteins: identification of mitochondrial histones,” Molecular BioSystems, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 1523–1536, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  186. V. Iacobazzi, A. Castegna, V. Infantino, and G. Andria, “Mitochondrial DNA methylation as a next-generation biomarker and diagnostic tool,” Molecular Genetics and Metabolism, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 25–34, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  187. F. Bouillaud, “UCP2, not a physiologically relevant uncoupler but a glucose sparing switch impacting ROS production and glucose sensing,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Bioenergetics, vol. 1787, no. 5, pp. 377–383, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  188. C. Pecqueur, C. Alves-Guerra, D. Ricquier, and F. Bouillaud, “UCP2, a metabolic sensor coupling glucose oxidation to mitochondrial metabolism?” IUBMB Life, vol. 61, no. 7, pp. 762–767, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  189. D. R. Christensen, P. C. Calder, and F. D. Houghton, “Effect of oxygen tension on the amino acid utilisation of human embryonic stem cells,” Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 237–246, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  190. B. Gondos, L. Westergaard, and A. G. Byskov, “Initiation of oogenesis in the human fetal ovary: ultrastructural and squash preparation study,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 155, no. 1, pp. 189–195, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  191. M. Dvořák and J. Tesařík, “Ultrastructure of human ovarian follicles,” in Biology of the Ovary, pp. 121–137, Springer, Netherlands, 1980. View at: Google Scholar
  192. J. Pozo, E. Corral, and J. Pereda, “Subcellular structure of prenatal human ovary: mitochondrial distribution during meiotic prophase,” Journal of Submicroscopic Cytology and Pathology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 601–607, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  193. P. M. Motta, S. Makabe, T. Naguro, and S. Correr, “Oocyte follicle cells association during development of human ovarian follicle. A study by high resolution scanning and transmission electron microscopy,” Archives of Histology and Cytology, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 369–394, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2017 Jarmon G. Lees et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views4435
Downloads1265
Citations

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.