Scientifica / 2014 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2014 |Article ID 564734 |

Helena Kuivaniemi, Evan J. Ryer, James R. Elmore, Irene Hinterseher, Diane T. Smelser, Gerard Tromp, "Update on Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Research: From Clinical to Genetic Studies", Scientifica, vol. 2014, Article ID 564734, 14 pages, 2014.

Update on Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Research: From Clinical to Genetic Studies

Academic Editor: B. Z. Simkhovich
Received17 Dec 2013
Accepted02 Feb 2014
Published17 Apr 2014


An abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a dilatation of the abdominal aorta with a diameter of at least 3.0 cm. AAAs are often asymptomatic and are discovered as incidental findings in imaging studies or when the AAA ruptures leading to a medical emergency. AAAs are more common in males than females, in individuals of European ancestry, and in those over 65 years of age. Smoking is the most important environmental risk factor. In addition, a positive family history of AAA increases the person’s risk for AAA. Interestingly, diabetes has been shown to be a protective factor for AAA in many large studies. Hallmarks of AAA pathogenesis include inflammation, vascular smooth muscle cell apoptosis, extracellular matrix degradation, and oxidative stress. Autoimmunity may also play a role in AAA development and progression. In this Outlook paper, we summarize our recent studies on AAA including clinical studies related to surgical repair of AAA and genetic risk factor and large-scale gene expression studies. We conclude with a discussion on our research projects using large data sets available through electronic medical records and biobanks.

1. Introduction

An abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a permanent localized dilatation of the abdominal aorta with a transverse diameter 3.0 cm [1]. AAAs are often asymptomatic and are discovered as incidental findings in imaging studies (e.g., abdominal ultrasonography or computerized tomography (CT) examination) or when the AAA ruptures leading to a medical emergency. AAAs are more common in males than females (6 : 1 ratio), in individuals of European ancestry and in those >65 years of age [28]. Smoking is the most important environmental risk factor for AAA development [28]. In addition, a positive family history of AAA increases a person’s risk for AAA [29]. Interestingly, diabetes has been shown to be a protective factor for AAA in many large studies [28].

Hallmarks of AAA pathogenesis include inflammation, vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) apoptosis, extracellular matrix (ECM) degradation, and oxidative stress [2, 5, 6, 10]. In AAA patients, T-cells secrete proinflammatory cytokines [11] and natural killer cells display increased cytotoxicity [12]. Autoimmunity may also play a role in AAA development and progression [3, 13].

In this Outlook paper, we summarize our recent studies on AAA starting with clinical observations and then moving into studies on the genetic risk factors for AAA followed by studies on the pathogenesis of AAA, large-scale gene expression studies and studies on animal models. Finally, we discuss future research using large data sets available through electronic medical records (EMR) and biobanks.

2. Clinical Studies on AAA

2.1. Rupture of AAA Is Preventable

The main risk of an untreated AAA is progressive expansion, rupture, hemorrhage, and death. AAA prevalence increases with age, and even though the incidence has declined in the past ten years [14], rupture of AAA is still a significant cause of death with 10–15% of AAAs presenting as ruptured AAAs (rAAA) in the emergency room. AAA rupture risk increases with increasing aortic diameter and this catastrophic event is associated with a mortality of 50 to 80% [1517]. Due to the excessive mortality associated with emergent repair, the mainstay of AAA management is early diagnosis and elective repair prior to rupture. In an effort to reduce the number of AAA-related deaths, the Screening Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Very Efficiently (SAAAVE) Act was approved by the United States Congress in January 2007. The SAAAVE Act permits a single screening aortic ultrasound examination as part of the “Welcome to Medicare” package for patients with defined risk factors for AAA. Specifically, males between the age of 65 and 75 years who have smoked greater than 100 cigarettes in their lifetime or patients of any age or sex with a strong family history are eligible for this screening examination [18]. Despite the introduction of the SAAAVE Act in 2007, screening for AAA remains underutilized [19]. Additionally, more recent data suggest that the implementation of the SAAAVE Act has not had any discernible effect on AAA rupture rate or AAA-related mortality, presumably due to its severe underutilization [20].

We have an active interest in AAA screening and studied whether routine medical evaluation in the ambulatory care setting combined with the utilization of the SAAAVE Act, in its current form, is an effective method for screening and diagnosing patients at risk for AAA [21]. To test our hypothesis, we retrospectively reviewed 149 consecutive patients presenting to our tertiary care center, Geisinger Health System (GHS) [22], with a rAAA. Of these 149 patients, 52 patients had complete EMR documentation of an ambulatory care visit within the 6 months prior to the date of rupture. Twenty-one of the ruptures (40%) had a radiographic study (duplex ultrasound or CT scan) that demonstrated an AAA. Only 12 of these 21 (57%) were referred to and evaluated by a vascular surgeon. Furthermore, under the current SAAAVE Act criteria, only 9/52 (17%) of the study patients would have been eligible for the “Welcome to Medicare” screening aortic ultrasound (Table 1). Of the male patients ineligible for screening under the SAAAVE Act, 7/36 (14%) were younger than 65 years and 19/36 (37%) were older than 75 years. Only 10/36 (19%) male patients were between the age of 65 and 75 years, seven of which were eligible for the screening ultrasound secondary to tobacco use. Eleven of the 19 male patients older than 75 years had a history of smoking and would have qualified under more inclusive age criteria. There were also 16/52 (31%) females between the age of 61 and 96 years who presented with a rAAA. Thirteen (81%) of the females had a smoking history. Unfortunately, AAA screening in female patients is not covered by the SAAAVE Act. Overall, greater than 80% of patients who presented to our institution with a rAAA would not be included in the SAAAVE Act screening program. From our investigation, we concluded that routine ambulatory medical evaluations in conjunction with current AAA screening methods are inadequate to detect AAAs in an at-risk population prior to rupture.

Smoking history
Family history of AAA
SAAVE act eligible

Age (male)
 65–7510 (19.2)707 (13.5)
 <657 (13.5)500
 >7519 (36.5)1111 (1.9)
Female16 (30.8)1311 (1.9)

Total (17.3)

AAA: abdominal aortic aneurysm; smoking history: patients had smoked >100 cigarettes in their lifetime.
Modified from [21].

2.2. Quality of Life for AAA Patients

We have also examined the long-term quality of life (QOL) in AAA patients under surveillance and after operative treatment [23]. We performed a retrospective analysis of 78 patients with small aneurysms (diameter 3.0–4.9 cm) undergoing surveillance at University Hospital of Dresden in Germany and compared them with long-term survivors following operative treatment during the time period of 1995 to 2006. The surgical group included 26 patients undergoing open repair for the treatment of a rAAA, 47 patients following elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), and 98 patients following elective open repair. Patients were assessed using the WHO Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) and Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). The WHOQOL-BREF is an internationally standardized QOL questionnaire that exists in different languages and is proven to determine reduced QOL in chronic diseases and the SF-36 is a well-known international QOL test, often used after surgical procedures. SF-36 is also available in multiple languages. Surprisingly, we found that patients undergoing surveillance for a small AAA had significantly diminished physical health () scores on the WHOQOL-BREF and significantly decreased role-emotional () and role-physical () on the SF-36 compared to the age- and sex-matched German control subjects. In contrast, patients undergoing elective AAA repair had similar QOL scores as matched German subjects. It is likely that the lower QOL in AAA patients undergoing surveillance can be improved through more intensive education about their health condition and the low risk of rupture in the early stages of the disease. Further studies will be needed to see if our efforts will improve QOL in small AAA patients undergoing surveillance.

2.3. Survival Rates of AAA Patients after Operative Treatment

Once AAAs are identified, they can be managed using different therapeutic modalities: traditional open surgical repair, minimally invasive EVAR, or continued surveillance. Treatment in most cases is selected based on aneurysm size, aneurysm shape, and the patient’s corresponding medical comorbidities. Traditional open surgical repair involves a large incision in the abdomen and replacement of the aneurysm with a synthetic fabric graft. An alternative treatment, first described in 1986, is EVAR [24]. This minimally invasive technique involves insertion of a fabric covered stent to reline the aneurysmal aorta via the femoral and iliac arteries. The function of the stent graft is to exclude the weakened aortic aneurysm wall from the systemic blood pressure and hence rupture. The introduction of EVAR has revolutionized the therapeutic approach to patients with AAA. Furthermore, the last decade has witnessed a rapid progression in the techniques and devices engineered to perform endovascular AAA stent grafting in an attempt to decrease graft-related complications and reinterventions. In our experience, suitable anatomy, device familiarity, and cost are the most important factors regarding selection for EVAR. In general, many of the current devices used according to instructions for use are equivalent regarding postoperative complications, migration, and aneurysm-related mortality [25]. In addition to device design, we have an active interest in studying the outcomes following AAA repair [26]. Recently, we compared the relative survival rates of patients after various operative treatments for AAA to those of the general population. To perform this study, we retrospectively reviewed the records of all patients who underwent open repair for rAAA, elective open repair, and elective EVAR of AAAs from 1995 to 2005 at the Vascular Center, Technical University of Dresden, Germany. The University Hospital of Dresden is among the higher-volume centers for AAA in Germany [27]. We studied 319 patients after operative treatment of AAA, including 113 (35%) with open rAAA repair, 152 (48%) with elective open AAA repair, and 54 (17%) with EVAR. Kaplan-Meier survival curves of the three operatively treated patient groups are shown in Figure 1. The rAAA patients showed a sharp decrease in survival during the first 6 months after operative management (including hospital mortality); 50% were alive after 6 months, 46% were alive after one year, and 36% were alive after three years. The elective open AAA repair group showed an 89% survival rate after one year and 82% after three years. The EVAR group had a survival rate of 96% after one year and 92% after three years. The time-specific relative survival rate of the rAAA group reached 1.0 at 16 months following emergency surgery and after ten months for open elective AAA repairs. The relative long-term survival rate in all three surgical groups was the same as that for the general German population. Our analysis demonstrated that the relative long-term survival after AAA repair, regardless of the modality, is equal to that of a comparable population-based group after the first postoperative month. We are hopeful that our efforts will assist clinicians in decision-making and may help a hesitant patient when deciding on management of their AAA.

2.4. Comparing the Cost of AAA Repair

In addition to studying clinical outcomes, we are also concerned with the cost of AAA repair. This is especially important as clinicians continually balance the use of emerging technology with efforts to decrease health care expenditures. Recent studies have shown that the standard minimally invasive EVAR procedure comes with decreased short term morbidity but also with increased costs [2830]. Furthermore, EVAR commonly involves extending the aortic repair past the common iliac arteries into the external iliac arteries, which adds both complexity and expense. Without thrombosis of the excluded internal iliac artery (IIA), retrograde flow can lead to continued sac pressurization (i.e., endoleak) and aneurysm enlargement. Conventionally, embolization has been achieved safely by inserting embolization coils into the proximal IIA to induce thrombosis. The Amplatzer Vascular Plug (AGA Medical Corp, Plymouth, Minnesota), a nitinol-based self-expanding cylindrical occlusion device, has been shown to be a suitable alternative to coil embolization. Since both modalities have been shown to be successful techniques, and limited data directly comparing the two treatment modalities are available, we sought to compare the two techniques [31]. To do so, we performed a retrospective review of 53 consecutive patients (51 males and 2 females) treated with percutaneous IIA embolizations prior to EVAR from 2004 to 2010. Twenty-nine were treated with platinum embolization coils (Cook Medical Inc., Bloomington, Indiana) and 28 were treated with Amplatzer Vascular Plug devices. Patients undergoing Plug embolization demonstrated significantly shorter procedure times (); however, periprocedural success or morbidity did not differ between the groups. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in charges for the embolization material, operating room, or overall hospital charges (Figure 2). These findings supported our initial hypothesis that these two treatment modalities, despite differing expert opinions, are equal in terms of efficacy and cost.

3. The Discovery of New Genetic Risk Factors for AAA

AAA is a complex, multifactorial disease with a strong genetic component [4, 69, 32, 33]. About 20% of AAA patients have at least one relative with this condition [4, 6, 7, 9, 34]. Since the first candidate gene studies were published 20 years ago, nearly 100 genetic association studies using single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in biologically relevant genes have been reported on AAA [9]. More recently, unbiased genome-wide approaches such as family-based DNA linkage studies and genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been carried out to identify susceptibility loci for AAA. By providing an updated synopsis of our AAA-related research efforts, we will examine the different approaches used to search out novel genetic risk factors.

3.1. DNA Linkage Studies

DNA linkage analysis is an unbiased genome-wide method used to identify susceptibility loci by following inheritance patterns of the disease of interest in a family through the use of genetic markers [35]. Typically, linkage between a specific genetic marker, or several markers, and the disease of interest can be determined using complex statistical analyses [36]. The most common approach of DNA linkage studies is to use large collections of multigenerational families. Due to the late-age-at onset of AAA and the fact that many patients die of ruptured AAA, it is difficult to collect blood samples for DNA isolations from large multigenerational families. DNA linkage studies on AAA have, therefore, used affected relative-pair approach. Using this approach two genetic loci, containing several plausible candidate genes located on chromosomes 4q31 and 19q13, were discovered for AAA [3739].

3.2. AAA Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS)

GWAS uses a case-control approach and examines many common genetic variants in a large number of individuals to identify a variant that is associated with a specific trait. GWAS typically focuses on associations between SNPs, variations in a single nucleotide within the DNA sequence, and their influence on health and disease. If sufficiently large case-control groups are used, GWAS is an efficient method to identify reproducible risk alleles predisposing to the disease of interest [9, 40]. GWAS has proven a powerful instrument to identify genetic risk factors associated with the presence of cardiovascular disease and has been carried out by international consortia to identify susceptibility loci for AAA [28, 4144].

The five chromosomal regions in the human genome with the strongest supporting evidence of contribution to the genetic risk for AAA are listed in Table 2 and include (1) CDKN2BAS gene (located on chromosome 9p21), also known as ANRIL, which encodes an antisense RNA that regulates expression of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors CDKN2A and CDKN2B [44]; (2) DAB2 interacting protein (DAB2IP; located on chromosome 9q33), which encodes an inhibitor of cell growth and survival [43]; (3) low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 (LRP1; located on chromosome 12q13.3), a plasma membrane receptor involved in vascular smooth muscle and macrophage endocytosis [45], (4) low density lipoprotein receptor (LRPR; located on chromosome 19p13.2) [41], and (5) contactin-3 (CNTN3; located on chromosome 3p12.3), which demonstrated the strongest association in smokers and yet its function remains unclear [42].

Chromosomal location (study)Nearest gene
(gene symbol; gene ID)
95% CI

3p12.3 [42]Contactin-3
(CNTN3; 5067)
9p21.3 [44]CDKN2B antisense RNA 1
(CDKN2BAS1; 100048912)
9q33.1 [43]DAB2 interacting protein
(DAB2IP; 153090)
12q13.3 [45]Low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1
(LRP1; 4035)
19p13.2 [41]Low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR; 3949)rs65117200.880.76

RAF: risk allele frequency in population; OR: odds ratio; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval; rs number: unique identifier for each single nucleotide polymorphism (for more information, see
Gene symbols and IDs are available from
values were taken from the first report demonstrating association with AAA and cited in the first column.
Modified from [4].

While the associations between these genetic loci and AAA are statistically strong, the functional variants contributing to the disease are not yet known. Furthermore, discovering the underlying biological mechanisms will require intense multidisciplinary efforts [46].

3.3. Pathway-Based Genetic Association Studies for AAA

As highlighted previously, GWAS is a powerful tool to detect genetic variants associated with a disease state of interest. With GWAS, it is common to focus on the statistically most significant results to avoid false positive results and ignore “less significant” variants with potentially greater biological plausibility. A pathway-based analysis approach to GWAS ranks differentially expressed genes by the significance of their expression along with the belief of plausibility and any prior disease association. In a recent investigation of ours [47], we applied such a biological pathway-based screen [48] to a whole-genome AAA case-control data set to determine whether variations in genes previously shown to be associated with either coronary artery disease (CAD) or blood lipids are also associated with AAA. The first phase of the study involved analyzing 44 lipid- and CAD-associated loci in a New Zealand discovery cohort (612 controls and 608 AAA cases), including four, PCSK9 (1p32.3), SORT1-CELSR2-PSRC1 (1p13.3), APOA1 (11q23.3), and LDLR (19p13.2), which were all strongly associated with both phenotypes. Of these, 15 lead SNPs were associated with AAA with observed values < 0.05. Three SNP associations, rs599839 on 1p13.3 (SORT1-CELSR2-PSRC1), rs4977574 on 9p21 (CDKN2BAS1), and rs4775049 on 15q21–23 (LIPC), had in the same direction of association in a separate New Zealand validation cohort (1,766 controls and 713 AAA cases) and were followed up in another separate cohort, the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium (WTCCC) AAA cohort (5,605 controls and 1,286 AAA cases). Two SNPs remained significant following WTCCC AAA cohort validation. These were the 1p13.3 SORT1-CELSR2-PSRC1 rs599839, which represents a novel AAA association, and rs4977574 9p21 CDKN2BAS1, which is in a previously reported AAA locus [44]. Replication in additional independent case-control cohorts demonstrated a consistent association with the G allele of rs599839 showing a protective effect within six of the 11 cohorts examined. In all of the 11 cohorts, the minor allele frequency (MAF) was lower in cases than in controls, and when all genotyped cohorts were analyzed together (7,048 AAA cases and 75,976 controls, pHet = 0.68), the meta value was 7.2 × 10−14. Modeling for confounding interactions of concurrent dyslipidemia, heart disease, and other risk factors suggested that this marker is an independent predictor of AAA susceptibility. This study represents another important discovery of ours in the ongoing investigation of genetic markers in AAA.

3.4. Candidate Gene Studies for AAA

Candidate gene analysis is yet another study design and is the most common approach used to analyze the genetics behind AAAs [6, 8, 9]. Candidate genes are selected based on their biological function and their potential role in the disease pathogenesis. In Table 3 we summarize the most significant genetic associations with AAA identified in candidate gene and pathway-based studies.

Gene name (study)Functional classPolymorphismAAA cases
95% CI

SORT1 [47]bLipid metabolismrs5998397,04875,9760.81
IL6R [49]Inflammationrs75292294,52415,7100.84
LPA [50]Lipid metabolismrs10455872 with
AGTR1 [51]bRenin-angiotensin systemrs51861,2261,7231.60
TGFBR2 [52]bTGFB signalingrs10360951,9042,6161.59
TGFBR2 [52]bTGFB signalingrs7645221,9042,6161.69
ACE [53]bRenin-angiotensin systemrs46469941,4151,6771.35
MMP3 [54]bDegradation of ECMrs30250581,2581,4061.48
MMP13 [55]bDegradation of ECMrs22520708008431.37
MTHFD1 [56]Methionine metabolismrs80033794234230.41
MTRR [56]Methionine metabolismrs3261184234230.47
LRP5 [57]Lipid metabolismrs3781590

OR: odds ratio; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval; ECM: extracellular matrix; TGFB: transforming growth factor beta; NA: not available. Gene symbols are available from
-values were taken from either a meta-analysis or the largest report demonstrating association with AAA and cited in the first column.
Modified from [4].

In one of the candidate gene studies, we investigated the causal relationship between variants of lipoprotein(a) (LPA) and AAA [50]. Our interest in LPA stemmed from the work by others [58] who demonstrated an association between the alleles of two SNPs in the LPA gene, rs10455872 and rs3798220, and high plasma levels of LPA as well as CAD. We utilized DNA samples from 35 case-control series that included patients with ischemic stroke (effective sample size (ne) = 9,396), peripheral arterial disease (ne = 5,215), AAA (,572), venous thromboembolism (ne = 4,607), intracranial aneurysm (ne = 1,328), and CAD (ne = 12,716), as well as from 3,714 subjects with carotid intima. media thickness measurements. The main analyses assessed the association between the outcome variables and the total number of minor alleles of either SNP (C allele of rs3798220 or G allele of rs10455872). The total number of minor alleles (or LPA score) was associated with AAA (OR: 1.23; 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.36; ). Given the substantial overlap between CAD and AAA, it is conceivable that the associations of the LPA variants with AAA are mediated through their association with CAD. To investigate this potential confounder, we reanalyzed the association between the LPA variants and AAA in cases with and without a history of CAD. After the exclusion of patients with CAD, the effect estimates for LPA score became lower for AAA (OR: 1.11; ), suggesting a stronger association of the LPA score with atherosclerotic disease manifested in more than one vascular bed. Although this study had limitations, it demonstrated an association between two variants in the LPA gene and AAA. Further studies are necessary to confirm these intriguing results as the possible association between dyslipidemia and AAA remains controversial.

In one of our more recent AAA projects we began by investigating plausible and physiologic candidate genes on chromosome 19, which we had previously found to be linked to AAA in our affected relative pair-based linkage study [38]. The AAA linkage interval on chromosome 19q13 spans approximately 4 Mbp and contains over 100 genes [38]. In order to identify a smaller set of more relevant candidate genes, Gene Ontology [59] and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) [60] were used to identify nine genes with functions relevant to AAA pathogenesis. Eight of these genes were selected based on an annotated function in the immune system and one gene (PEPD) was included based on its potential for contributing to ECM remodeling in the AAA wall [61]. Using DNA samples from 394 cases and 419 controls, we genotyped 41 SNPs located in or around the nine candidate genes and found eight SNPs in three genes, CD22 (2 SNPs), PEPD (5 SNPs), and HAMP (hepcidin antimicrobial peptide; 1 SNP), as being nominally associated with AAA (). When tested for genotypic association using logistic regression, six of these SNPs were nominally associated, two were not associated, and an additional SNP in GPI (glucose-6-phosphate isomerase) was identified; however, only the association with the SNP rs7248389 in the PEPD gene remained significant when correcting for multiple testing. Further analysis of the PEPD gene with DNA sequencing, however, failed to identify mutations responsible for AAA formation. These results demonstrate the difficulty in making educated guesses about potential targets in candidate gene studies.

3.5. Meta-Analysis of Genetic Association Studies on Polymorphisms in the Matrix Metalloproteinase Genes

A meta-analysis is a statistical technique that combines results from different studies in an effort to improve reliability. While most commonly applied to clinical studies it can also be used to improve the reliability of genetic studies. To this end, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of SNPs within the gene families of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and their inhibitors (tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases; TIMPs) and their association with AAA [54]. To accomplish this task, we performed a search of MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify studies assessing the association of SNPs in MMP and TIMP genes with AAA. We initially identified a total of 168 published studies. After more critical examination, only 13 studies were deemed suitable and were included in the meta-analysis. The combined population size of the 13 studies totaled 7,037 individuals (3,581 AAA case and 3,456 controls). Sample sizes ranged from 91 to 1,337 participants per study and represented a population of European ancestry from North America, Europe, and Australia. Studies varied with regard to inclusion criteria, screening for potentially undiagnosed AAA, distribution of conventional AAA risk factors, as well as matching cases and controls for AAA risk factors, age, sex, and smoking. All studies that reported differences in the prevalence of traditional AAA risk factors between AAA and control populations conducted multiple logistic regression analyses. Assessment of deviation from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was stated in 10 studies; however, evaluation of genotyping error and reporting of appropriate rs numbers were evident in only four and five studies, respectively. Overall, 58 SNPs in 10 genes were examined. Of these, eight SNPs in eight genes (rs1799750, MMP1; rs3025058, MMP3; rs3918242, MMP9; rs486055, MMP10; rs2276109, MMP12; rs2252070, MMP13; rs4898, TIMP1; and rs9619311, TIMP3) were assessed commonly in at least three different sample populations and were included in the meta-analysis. Three SNPs were assessed in two studies and the remaining 47 SNPs were reported in only one study, mostly identified through sequencing of entire coding regions. This meta-analysis revealed that the 5A allele of MMP3 rs3025058 () was significantly associated with AAA under dominant (OR = 1.48; 95% CI: 1.23 to 1.78; ) and recessive (OR = 1.31; 95% CI: 1.10 to 1.56; ) models of inheritance. Further investigations of this marker may improve our understanding of AAA pathogenesis and assist targeted AAA screening programs.

4. Novel Insights on AAA Pathobiology

4.1. The Role of Microorganisms in the Pathogenesis of AAA

Microorganisms, including Chlamydia [6264], Mycoplasma pneumoniae [62], Helicobacter pylori [62], human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) [65], herpes simplex virus (HSV) [66], and different oral bacteria [6769] may serve as possible triggers for the development of AAAs, but data remain inconclusive. We, too, were intrigued by a possible microbial trigger in AAA pathobiology and therefore studied whether Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato (sl), the microorganism responsible for Lyme disease, was involved in the etiology of AAAs [70]. Using a case-control design, we recruited 96 consecutive patients diagnosed with AAA using ultrasonography or CT (diameter 3 cm) at the Vascular Surgery Department, Technical University, Dresden, Germany. We collected venous blood samples from participants and analyzed them for antibodies against B. burgdorferi using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Any positive result was confirmed by Western blot analysis. Among AAA patients, 34% were seropositive for B. burgdorferi s.l. antibodies, whereas only 15.7% of patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) were seropositive (Figure 3; ). In comparison, in the German general population, 3–17% are seropositive for Borrelia antibodies [7175]. Among forest workers one study reported 7.9% seropositive rate [73] and another study 29.1% [76]. Our findings suggested a relationship between AAAs and B. burgdorferi s.l. We hypothesize that the underlying mechanism for B. burgdorferi s.l. in AAA formation is similar to that by the spirochete Treponema pallidum; alternatively, AAAs could develop due to induced autoimmunity via molecular mimicry or via similarities between B. burgdorferi s.l. proteins and aortic proteins. We recognize the limitations surrounding this small study and are planning a larger scale endeavor on a more diverse patient population.

4.2. Genome-Wide Microarray-Based mRNA Studies

An unbiased approach to study AAA pathogenesis at the molecular level is to carry out a genome-wide microarray-based mRNA or microRNA (miRNA) analysis to identify changes in mRNA and miRNA levels associated with AAA [7, 8, 33, 77, 78]. In silico analysis can be used to classify the genes into functional groups and pathways. Another computational approach is to find transcription factor bindings sites in the genes with altered expression [79].

We recently reported the results of our second microarray-based mRNA expression study on human AAA [80] and combined these findings with our previous study [81]. The combined analysis revealed 57 differentially expressed genes with consistent results in both studies (Figure 4). A total of 32 genes had increased and 25 decreased expression in AAA (Figure 4). The significance of the overlap between the two independent experiments was evaluated using Fisher’s exact test. The odds ratio was 8.9 (95% CI: 5.6–14.3) and . We then selected 43 genes for follow-up studies with emphasis on genes not previously implicated in AAA pathobiology [80]. These genes represented a wide range of biological functional categories such as “calcium signaling,” “cell development and differentiation,” “cell adhesion,” and “inflammatory response.” The mRNA levels were significantly different between AAA and nonaneurysmal infrarenal aortic control samples in 38/43 (88%) genes tested using a RT-PCR-based PCR array method [80] and the direction of the change was the same seen in both microarray studies [80, 81]. Novel validated genes in AAA pathobiology included ADCY7, ARL4C, BLNK, FOSB, GATM, LYZ, MFGE8, PRUNE2, PTPRC, SMTN, TMODI, and TPM2. Considering that the results of two independent microarray studies and the PCR array were concordant, we are confident that these genes are differentially expressed in AAA and could contribute to AAA pathogenesis.

In another study, we focused on the complement cascade for further investigation [82]. Our previous microarray study [81] had shown that 13 (38%) of the 34 genes of the complement cascade arm of the “complement and coagulation cascades” KEGG pathway had significantly different mRNA expressions between AAA and control tissues. Five had increased and eight had decreased expression in AAA compared to the control tissues. Furthermore, follow-up studies showed strong staining of AAA tissue samples using an antibody specific to C2, one of the complement cascade proteins. In silico analysis of the promoter regions of the 13 differentially expressed complement cascade genes using Whole Genome rVISTA showed enrichment for binding sites for a transcription factor STAT5A when compared to the entire genome. To experimentally validate that STAT5A binds on the promoters of the complement cascade genes, chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by hybridization to high-density promoter arrays (ChIP-chip) was carried out using microarrays covering 10 kbp of the promoters of all known genes. STAT5A demonstrated binding to 6,297 distinct genes, 1,095 (17%) of which were differentially expressed in human AAA tissue (431 had increased expression and 664 had decreased expression). In the complement cascade genes, strong evidence for STAT5A binding was found on 10 of the 34 complement cascade genes and moderate evidence on nine complement cascade genes. In summary, this study provided multiple lines of evidence that complement cascade is important in AAA pathogenesis and that in human AAA the pathway is activated via the lectin and classical pathways.

Our microarray-based mRNA expression profiles [81] also formed the foundation for the study on HOX (homeodomain-containing) genes in AAA [83]. We had found that 78 HOX genes were expressed in the adult human aorta and that 31 of these had significantly different mRNA levels in AAA compared to control abdominal aortic tissues from an age-, sex-, and ethnicity-matched group of individuals. Ten of these 31 genes were so-called classic HOX genes. Interestingly, the mRNA levels of all of them were significantly decreased in AAA [83]. HOXA4 was the most significantly decreased HOX gene in human AAA tissue based on microarray results. We confirmed its decreased expression in an independent set of 12 AAA cases and 12 similarly aged controls using a real-time quantitative RT-PCR assay. We also detected HOXA4 mRNA in cultured human aortic SMCs and aortic endothelial cells. Another intriguing finding was that HOX4A expression was lower in the abdominal than in the thoracic aorta. Abdominal aorta is known to be more susceptible for aneurysm formation. Downregulation of HOX genes could have several detrimental effects in the human aorta, since HOX genes have well-established roles in regulating cell proliferation and differentiation [83].

4.3. Genome-Wide MicroRNA (miRNA) Analysis for AAA

miRNAs are small, well-conserved, noncoding molecules which can inhibit gene expression at the posttranscriptional level. Each miRNA is predicted to regulate a large number of target genes (mRNAs). We recently published our microarray-based genome-wide analysis of miRNA patterns in human AAA [84]. Five miRNAs (miR-133b, miR-133a, miR-331-3p, miR-30c-2, and miR-204) found to be downregulated in AAA were then validated with real-time quantitative RT-PCR and an independent set of samples. Extensive bioinformatic analyses were carried out to identify the mRNA targets of these miRNAs (Figure 5). A total of 1,836 potential target genes were found, 222 of which were significantly upregulated in our previously published mRNA expression study [81]. One of these targets was MMP9 which has a well-established role in AAA pathogenesis [85].

4.4. Animal Models of AAA Pathogenesis

While it is our preference to use human AAA tissue in our studies, it can only be obtained during open repair operations and, therefore, studies on human AAA are restricted to end-stage disease with hugely altered aortic tissue architecture. Thankfully, several mouse models for aneurysms have been developed [8] providing an opportunity to study early stages of aneurysm development. The most widely used of them is the so-called angiotensin II- (AngII-) induced mouse model of aortic aneurysms in which mice lacking the apolipoprotein E gene receive an infusion of angiotensin II and develop vascular lesions including atherosclerosis, dissection, and dilatation of the suprarenal aorta. In a collaborative study with the team from the Nationwide Children’s Hospital, we investigated the role of Notch signaling in aneurysm formation using this mouse model [86]. Notch 1 is a human gene that encodes a transmembrane receptor which plays multiple roles during development and cell differentiation. Notch 1 signaling was found to be activated in this AAA mouse model. Additionally, Notch 1 haploinsufficiency and pharmacological inhibition of Notch 1 signaling reduced the incidence of aortic aneurysms by preventing the accumulation of inflammatory cells to the aneurysm [86].

5. Electronic Medical Records and Biobanks: New Resources for Epidemiological and Genetic Research

GHS is an integrated, comprehensive health care delivery system that serves a large, stable, mainly rural population in North central and Northeastern Pennsylvania [22]. GHS is considered one of the most wired health care organizations in the USA and it has utilized a unified EMR since 1996 [22]. To facilitate research data mining and analysis, in 2008, GHS implemented a data warehouse system including the outpatient records of all patients seen by both primary care and specialty providers [22]. Another important initiative launched by GHS was the biobanking program called the MyCode project, which includes a central repository of patient samples (blood, DNA, serum, and tissue) that are linkable to EMR for broad research use in a manner that protects confidentiality of patient information [87].

To test our hypothesis that EMR can be utilized retrospectively to identify risk factors and that it is comparable to traditional epidemiological methods for risk factor assessment of a complex disease, we used AAA as a test case [88]. In this study approximately 900 AAA cases and over 14,000 controls were identified from the EMR at GHS and used to identify risk factors for AAA. We replicated the direction and magnitude of several known risk factors originally found in traditional epidemiological AAA studies [88]. This study demonstrated that EMR is a useful resource to assess risk factors and identify new associations.

GHS is one of the nine members of the electronic MEdical Records and GEnomics (eMERGE) network, a National Human Genome Research Institute- (NHGRI-) funded consortium which is developing methods and best practices for the utilization of the EMR as a tool for genomic research [89]. Each member in the eMERGE consortium has an EMR and a biobank and has proposed diseases or traits for which phenotyping algorithms [90] are being developed and genetic studies are carried out leading towards returning results to the patients and incorporating them into the EMR. We are fortunate that the GHS eMERGE team, along with others, has been assigned to lead the AAA-related efforts. Another important task for the eMERGE network is developing best practices and tools for patient and physician education.

At GHS the strategy for integration of genetic data into EMR is modeled on processes developed by the Clinical Transformation Team, a dedicated department devoted to creating information technology- (IT-) enabled improvements in patient care [22]. A “Care Gaps” strategy is used, in which clinical areas are evaluated to identify IT processes that can be incorporated into the EMR to improve patient care [22]. Care gaps looking to improve early diagnosis and screening for AAA are an ongoing effort of the Clinical Transformation Team.

The eMERGE network has generated data sets with available genome-wide and phenotypic data on a large number of individuals which provides an excellent resource for testing various hypotheses without a huge investment of funds for first generating the genotype data. For example, we contributed to a recent study investigating genetic pleiotropy for SNPs to identify underlying cellular mechanisms among diseases [91].

6. Outlook

The progress on our understanding of the clinical, genetic, and molecular factors contributing to the development, growth, and rupture of AAA has been remarkable in the past ten years. There are, however, still a large number of unsolved questions about AAA pathogenesis and how to translate the knowledge gained into better diagnostic and treatment options for AAA patients. Obtaining answers to these questions will require innovative, interdisciplinary approaches. It will be necessary to integrate information from epidemiological, genetic, molecular biology, and bioengineering studies on humans and animal models. It is more evident than ever that multicenter collaborations are needed for accomplishing these goals. Many of the findings described in this Outlook paper were discussed in two recent International Symposia on AAA which we helped to organize: (1) “Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Epidemiology, Genetics, and Pathophysiology” held on 20–22 October, 2011, at the Geisinger Clinic, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA [2] and (2) the “3rd International Meeting on Aortic Diseases” (IMAD3) held on October 4–6, 2012, in Liège, Belgium [5]. These disease-centered international conferences provide the ideal forum to engage experts from different disciplines into thought-provoking discussions and forward-thinking collaborations.

The vision we have for the future of AAA research is to expand the genetic and genomic studies to include larger samples sizes and different stages of the AAA development. Next steps will also include translating the basic science findings into diagnostic tests and medical treatment of AAA. The primary goal remains to prevent rupture by finding AAAs early to allow for safe surgical repair. It is likely that one day AAAs will be treated medically to slow their growth, helping to transform a surgical disease into a medical disease.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contribution

Helena Kuivaniemi and Evan J. Ryer contributed equally to the paper.


The work of the authors was funded through the following grants: U01HG006382 and HL064310 from the NIH; a grant from the Geisinger Clinical Research Fund; and “Utility of genomic data in population screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm” from The Commonwealth Universal Research Enhancement (CURE) program of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Irene Hinterseher was a recipient of Research Fellowships from Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Hi 1479/2-1) and from the Technical University of Dresden (Frauenhabilitationsstipendium der Medizinischen Fakultät Dresden), Germany.


  1. A. T. Hirsch, Z. J. Haskal, N. R. Hertzer et al., “ACC/AHA 2005 Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): a collaborative report from the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology,,” Circulation, vol. 113, no. 11, pp. e463–654, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  2. H. Kuivaniemi and J. R. Elmore, “Opportunities in abdominal aortic aneurysm research: epidemiology, genetics, and pathophysiology,” Annals of Vascular Surgery, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 862–870, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. H. Kuivaniemi, C. D. Platsoucas, and M. D. Tilson III, “Aortic aneurysms: an immune disease with a strong genetic component,” Circulation, vol. 117, no. 2, pp. 242–252, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. H. Kuivaniemi, E. J. Ryer, H. R. Yoon, and J. R. Elmore, “Genetic risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysms,” in Aortic Aneurysms: Risk Factors, Diagnosis, Surgery & Repair, D. Fischhof and F. Hatig, Eds., pp. 1–29, Nova Science, New York, NY, USA, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  5. H. Kuivaniemi, N. Sakalihasan, F. A. Lederle et al., “New insights into aortic diseases: a report from the third international meeting on aortic diseases (IMAD3),” AORTA, vol. 1, article 23, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  6. H. Kuivaniemi, G. Tromp, D. J. Carey, and J. R. Elmore, “The molecular biology and genetics of aneurysms,” in Molecular and Translational Vascular Medicine, J. W. Homeister and M. S. Willis, Eds., pp. 3–33, Springer Science+Business Media, New York, NY, USA, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  7. J. H. Lillvis, G. M. Lenk, and H. Kuivaniemi, “Genetics of abdominal aortic aneurysms,” in Aortic Aneurysms: Pathogenesis and Treatment, G. R. Upchurch and E. Criado, Eds., pp. 1–26, Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, USA, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  8. J. Nischan, G. M. Lenk, A. M. Boddy, J. H. Lillvis, G. Tromp, and H. Kuivaniemi, “Abdominal aortic aneurysms- a complex genetic disease,” in Aneurysms: Types, Risks, Formation and Treatment, A. Laurent and M. E. Hauppage, Eds., pp. 35–93, Nova Science, New York, NY, USA, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  9. I. Hinterseher, G. Tromp, and H. Kuivaniemi, “Genes and abdominal aortic aneurysm,” Annals of Vascular Surgery, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 388–412, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. A. M. Boddy, G. M. Lenk, J. H. Lillvis, J. Nischan, Y. Kyo, and H. Kuivaniemi, “Basic research studies to understand aneurysm disease,” Drug News and Perspectives, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 142–148, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. N. D. Forester, S. M. Cruickshank, D. J. A. Scott, and S. R. Carding, “Functional characterization of T cells in abdominal aortic aneurysms,” Immunology, vol. 115, no. 2, pp. 262–270, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. N. D. Forester, S. M. Cruickshank, D. J. A. Scott, and S. R. Carding, “Increased natural killer cell activity in patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 46–54, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. V. P. Jagadesham, D. J. A. Scott, and S. R. Carding, “Abdominal aortic aneurysms: an autoimmune disease?” Trends in Molecular Medicine, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 522–529, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. D. Sidloff, P. Stather, N. Dattani et al., “Aneurysm global epidemiology study: public health measures can further reduce abdominal aortic aneurysm mortality,” Circulation, vol. 129, no. 7, pp. 747–753, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. P. S. Basnyat, A. H. B. Biffin, L. G. Moseley, A. R. Hedges, and M. H. Lewis, “Mortality from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in Wales,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 86, no. 6, pp. 765–770, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. D. J. Ballard, G. Filardo, G. Fowkes, and J. T. Powell, “Surgery for small asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 4, Article ID CD001835, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  17. E. L. Verhoeven, M. R. Kapma, H. Groen et al., “Mortality of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm treated with open or endovascular repair,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1396–1400, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. E. S. Lee, E. Pickett, N. Hedayati, D. L. Dawson, and W. C. Pevec, “Implementation of an aortic screening program in clinical practice: implications for the Screen for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Very Efficiently (SAAAVE) Act,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 1107–1111, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. “SAAAVE Act Background,” View at: Google Scholar
  20. J. B. Shreibati, L. C. Baker, M. A. Hlatky, and M. W. Mell, “Impact of the Screening Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Very Efficiently (SAAAVE) Act on abdominal ultrasonography use among Medicare beneficiaries,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 172, pp. 1456–1462, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. K. Eckroth-Bernard, R. Garvin, E. Ryer, J. Elmore, and D. Franklin, “The SAAAVE Act and routine ambulatory medical care fail to diagnose patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms prior to rupture: a single-institution experience,” ISRN Vascular Medicine, vol. 2013, Article ID 134019, 6 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. G. Steele Jr., “Re-engineering systems of care: surgical leadership,” Journal of the American College of Surgeons, vol. 210, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. I. Hinterseher, H. Kuffner, H. Berth et al., “Long-term quality of life of abdominal aortic aneurysm patients under surveillance or after operative treatment,” Annals of Vascular Surgery, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 553–561, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. N. L. Volodos', V. E. Shekhanin, I. P. Karpovich, V. I. Troian, and I. A. Gur'ev, “A self-fixing synthetic blood vessel endoprosthesis,” Vestnik Khirurgii Imeni I.I.Grekova, vol. 137, no. 11, pp. 123–125, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  25. K. Eckroth-Bernard, R. Garvin, and E. Ryer, “Current status of endovascular devises to treat abdominal aortic aneurysms,” Biomedical Engineering and Computational Biology Insights, vol. 5, pp. 25–32, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  26. I. Hinterseher, H. Kuffner, R. Koch, G. Gäbel, H. D. Saeger, and D. Smelser, “Comparison of survival rates for abdominal aortic aneurysm treatment methods,” World Journal of Surgery, vol. 36, pp. 917–922, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. H.-H. Eckstein, T. Bruckner, P. Heider et al., “The relationship between volume and outcome following elective open repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms (AAA) in 131 German hospitals,” European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 260–266, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. L. C. Brown, J. T. Powell, S. G. Thompson, D. M. Epstein, M. J. Sculpher, and R. M. Greenhalgh, “The UK endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) trials: randomised trials of EVAR versus standard therapy,” Health Technology Assessment, vol. 16, no. 9, p. -218, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. B. W. Propper and C. J. Abularrage, “Long-term safety and efficacy of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair,” Journal of Vascular Health and Risk Management, vol. 9, pp. 135–141, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  30. D. H. Stone, A. J. Horvath, P. P. Goodney et al., “The financial implications of endovascular aneurysm repair in the cost containment era,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 283.e281–290.e281, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  31. E. J. Ryer, R. P. Garvin, T. P. Webb, D. P. Franklin, and J. R. Elmore, “Comparison of outcomes with coils versus vascular plug embolization of the internal iliac artery for endovascular aortoiliac aneurysm repair,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 56, pp. 1239–1245, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  32. J. Golledge and H. Kuivaniemi, “Genetics of abdominal aortic aneurysm,” Current Opinion in Cardiology, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 290–296, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. G. Tromp, H. Kuivaniemi, I. Hinterseher, and D. J. Carey, “Novel genetic mechanisms for aortic aneurysms,” Current Atherosclerosis Reports, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 259–266, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. N. Sakalihasan, J. O. Defraigne, M. A. Kerstenne et al., “Family members of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms are at increased risk for aneurysms: analysis of 618 probands and their families from the Liege AAA Family Study,” Annals of Vascular Surgery, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. G. Tromp and H. Kuivaniemi, “How does one study genetic risk factors in a complex disease such as aneurysms?” in Aortic Aneurysms: New Insights into an Old Problem, N. Sakalihasan, H. Kuivaniemi, and M. J.-B. Liège, Eds., pp. 115–144, Les Editions de l'Universite de Liège, Belgium, UK, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  36. J. M. Olson, J. S. Witte, and R. C. Elston, “Genetic mapping of complex traits,” Statistics in Medicine, vol. 18, pp. 2961–2981, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  37. “Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man, OMIM,” View at: Google Scholar
  38. H. Shibamura, J. M. Olson, C. van Vlijmen-van Keulen et al., “Genome scan for familial abdominal aortic aneurysm using sex and family history as covariates suggests genetic heterogeneity and identifies linkage to chromosome 19q13,” Circulation, vol. 109, no. 17, pp. 2103–2108, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. C. J. van Vlijmen-van Keulen, J. A. Rauwerda, and G. Pals, “Genome-wide linkage in three Dutch families maps a locus for abdominal aortic aneurysms to chromosome 19q13.3,” European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 29–35, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. S. M. Krishna, A. E. Dear, P. E. Norman, and J. Golledge, “Genetic and epigenetic mechanisms and their possible role in abdominal aortic aneurysm,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 212, no. 1, pp. 16–29, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. D. T. Bradley, A. E. Hughes, S. A. Badger et al., “A variant in LDLR is associated with abdominal aortic aneurysm,” Circulation: Cardiovascular Genetics, vol. 6, pp. 498–504, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. J. R. Elmore, M. A. Obmann, H. Kuivaniemi et al., “Identification of a genetic variant associated with abdominal aortic aneurysms on chromosome 3p12.3 by genome wide association,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 1525–1531, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. S. Gretarsdottir, A. F. Baas, G. Thorleifsson et al., “Genome-wide association study identifies a sequence variant within the DAB2IP gene conferring susceptibility to abdominal aortic aneurysm,” Nature Genetics, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 692–697, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. A. Helgadottir, G. Thorleifsson, K. P. Magnusson et al., “The same sequence variant on 9p21 associates with myocardial infarction, abdominal aortic aneurysm and intracranial aneurysm,” Nature Genetics, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 217–224, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. M. J. Bown, G. T. Jones, S. C. Harrison et al., “Abdominal aortic aneurysm is associated with a variant in low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1,” American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 89, no. 5, pp. 619–627, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. S. L. Edwards, J. Beesley, J. D. French, and A. M. Dunning, “Beyond GWASs: illuminating the dark road from association to function,” The American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 93, pp. 779–797, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  47. G. T. Jones, M. J. Bown, S. Gretarsdottir et al., “A sequence variant associated with sortilin-1 (SORT1) on 1p13. 3 is independently associated with abdominal aortic aneurysm,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 22, pp. 2941–2947, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. K. Wang, M. Li, and H. Hakonarson, “Analysing biological pathways in genome-wide association studies,” Nature Reviews Genetics, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 843–854, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. S. C. Harrison, A. J. Smith, G. T. Jones et al., “Interleukin-6 receptor pathways in abdominal aortic aneurysm,” European Heart Journal, vol. 34, no. 48, pp. 3707–3716, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. A. Helgadottir, S. Gretarsdottir, G. Thorleifsson et al., “Apolipoprotein(a) genetic sequence variants associated with systemic atherosclerosis and coronary atherosclerotic burden but not with venous thromboembolism,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 60, pp. 722–729, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  51. G. T. Jones, A. R. Thompson, F. M. van Bockxmeer et al., “Angiotensin II type 1 receptor 1166C polymorphism is associated with abdominal aortic aneurysm in three independent cohorts,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 764–770, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. E. Biros, P. E. Norman, G. T. Jones et al., “Meta-analysis of the association between single nucleotide polymorphisms in TGF-β receptor genes and abdominal aortic aneurysm,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 219, no. 1, pp. 218–223, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. P. McColgan, G. E. Peck, R. M. Greenhalgh, and P. Sharma, “The genetics of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a comprehensive meta-analysis involving eight candidate genes in over 16,700 patients,” International Surgery, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 350–358, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  54. D. R. Morris, E. Biros, O. Cronin, H. Kuivaniemi, and J. Golledge, “The association of genetic variants of matrix metalloproteinases with abdominal aortic aneurysm: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Heart, vol. 100, pp. 295–302, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  55. C. Saracini, P. Bolli, E. Sticchi et al., “Polymorphisms of genes involved in extracellular matrix remodeling and abdominal aortic aneurysm,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 171–179, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. B. Giusti, C. Saracini, P. Bolli et al., “Genetic analysis of 56 polymorphisms in 17 genes involved in methionine metabolism in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm,” Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 45, no. 11, pp. 721–730, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. S. Galora, C. Saracini, A. M. Palombella et al., “Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 gene polymorphisms and genetic susceptibility to abdominal aortic aneurysm,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 58, pp. 1062–1068, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  58. R. Clarke, J. F. Peden, J. C. Hopewell et al., “Genetic variants associated with Lp(a) lipoprotein level and coronary disease,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 361, no. 26, pp. 2518–2528, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. M. Ashburner, C. A. Ball, J. A. Blake et al., “Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium,” Nature Genetics, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 25–29, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. M. Kanehisa and S. Goto, “KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 27–30, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  61. J. H. Lillvis, Y. Kyo, G. Tromp et al., “Analysis of positional candidate genes in the AAA1 susceptibility locus for abdominal aortic aneurysms on chromosome 19,” BMC Medical Genetics, vol. 12, article 14, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. F. Blasi, F. Denti, M. Erba et al., “Detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae but not Helicobacter pylori in atherosclerotic plaques of aortic aneurysms,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 2766–2769, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  63. B. Falkensammer, C. Duftner, R. Seiler et al., “Lack of microbial DNA in tissue specimens of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms and positive Chlamydiales serology,” European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 141–145, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. L. J. T. Pires and P. S. Gutierrez, “Morphometrical quantification of Chlamydia pneumoniae and Mycoplasma pneumoniae in human atherosclerotic abdominal aortic aneurysms,” Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 322–331, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. S. Gredmark-Russ, M. Dzabic, A. Rahbar et al., “Active cytomegalovirus infection in aortic smooth muscle cells from patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm,” Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 347–356, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. K. J. Ozsvath, H. Hirose, S. Xia, and M. D. Tilson, “Molecular mimicry in human aortic aneurysmal diseases,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 800, pp. 288–293, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. N. Kurihara, Y. Inoue, T. Iwai, M. Umeda, Y. Huang, and I. Ishikawa, “Detection and localization of periodontopathic bacteria in abdominal aortic aneurysms,” European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 553–558, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. R. Marques da Silva, D. A. Caugant, E. R. K. Eribe et al., “Bacterial diversity in aortic aneurysms determined by 16S ribosomal RNA gene analysis,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 1055–1060, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. K. Wada and Y. Kamisaki, “Roles of oral bacteria in cardiovascular diseases—from molecular mechanisms to clinical cases: involvement of porphyromonas gingivalis in the development of human aortic aneurysm,” Journal of Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 113, no. 2, pp. 115–119, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. I. Hinterseher, G. Gäbel, F. Corvinus et al., “Presence of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato antibodies in the serum of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms,” European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, vol. 31, pp. 781–789, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. M. Böhme, S. Schwenecke, E. Fuchs, D. Wiebecke, and H. Karch, “Screening of blood donors and recipients for Borrelia burgdorferi antibodies: no evidence of B. burgdorferi burgdorferi infection transmitted by transfusion,” Infusionsther Transfusionsmed, vol. 19, pp. 204–207, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  72. D. Hassler, L. Zoller, M. Haude, H. D. Hufnagel, and H. G. Sonntag, “Lyme borreliosis in an endemic region in Europe. Prevalence of antibodies and clinical spectrum,” Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift, vol. 117, pp. 767–774, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. R. Kaiser, A. Kern, D. Kampa, and D. Neumann-Haefelin, “Prevalence of antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi and tick-borne encephalitis virus in an endemic region in Southern Germany,” Zentralbl Bakteriol, vol. 286, pp. 534–541, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  74. Robert Koch Institut (RKI), “Waldarbeiter-Studie Berlin- Brandenburg 2000 zu zeckenübertragenden und anderen Zoonosen,” Epid Bull, vol. 16, pp. 109–110, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  75. T. Weiland, P. Kühnl, R. Laufs, and J. Heesemann, “Prävalenz von Borrelia-burgdorferi-Antikörpern bei Hamburger Blutspendern,” in Transfusionsmedizin 1991/92 Beitrag Infusionstherapie, V. Kretschmer, W. Stangel, and D. Wiebecke, Eds., pp. 92–95, Karger, Basel, Switzerland, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  76. P. M. Rath, B. Ibershoff, A. Mohnhaupt et al., “Seroprevalence of Lyme borreliosis in forestry workers from Brandenburg, Germany,” European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 372–377, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. M. Estrelinha, I. Hinterseher, and H. Kuivaniemi, “Gene expression studies in human abdominal aortic aneurysm,” Reviews in Vascular Medicine, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. G. Tromp and H. Kuivaniemi, “Developments in genomics to improve understanding, diagnosis and management of aneurysms and peripheral artery disease,” European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 676–682, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. J. Nischan, Z. Gatalica, C. Mindee, G. M. Lenk, T. Gerard, and H. Kuivaniemi, “Binding sites for ETS family of transcription factors dominate the promoter regions of differentially expressed genes in abdominal aortic aneurysms,” Circulation: Cardiovascular Genetics, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 565–572, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. I. Hinterseher, R. Erdman, J. R. Elmore et al., “Novel pathways in the pathobiology of human abdominal aortic aneurysms,” Pathobiology, vol. 80, pp. 1–10, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  81. G. M. Lenk, G. Tromp, S. Weinsheimer, Z. Gatalica, R. Berguer, and H. Kuivaniemi, “Whole genome expression profiling reveals a significant role for immune function in human abdominal aortic aneurysms,” BMC Genomics, vol. 8, article 237, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. I. Hinterseher, R. Erdman, L. A. Donoso et al., “Role of complement cascade in abdominal aortic aneurysms,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 1653–1660, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. J. H. Lillvis, R. Erdman, C. M. Schworer et al., “Regional expression of HOXA4 along the aorta and its potential role in human abdominal aortic aneurysms,” BMC Physiology, vol. 11, no. 1, article 9, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. M. C. Pahl, K. Derr, G. Gabel et al., “MicroRNA expression signature in human abdominal aortic aneurysms,” BMC Medical Genomics, vol. 5, article 25, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  85. F. Aziz and H. Kuivaniemi, “Role of matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors in preventing abdominal aortic aneurysm,” Annals of Vascular Surgery, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 392–401, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. C. P. Hans, S. N. Koenig, N. Huang et al., “Inhibition of Notch1 signaling reduces abdominal aortic aneurysm in mice by attenuating macrophage-mediated inflammation,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 32, pp. 3012–3023, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. G. S. Gerhard, D. J. Carey, and G. D. Steele, “Electronic health records in genomic medicine,” in Genomic and Personalized Medicine, G. S. Ginsburg and H. F. Willard, Eds., pp. 287–294, Academic Press, London, UK, 2nd edition, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  88. D. T. Smelser, G. Tromp, J. R. Elmore, S. H. Kuivaniemi, D. P. Franklin, and D. J. Carey, “Abstract P392: utilization of electronic medical records to identify risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysm,” Circulation, vol. 125, article AP392, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  89. O. Gottesman, H. Kuivaniemi, G. Tromp et al., “The Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network: past, present, and future,” Genetics in Medicine, vol. 15, pp. 761–771, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  90. D. Smelser, G. Tromp, J. Elmore et al., “PS2-8: ePhenotyping for abdominal aortic aneurysm,” Clinical Medicine & Research, vol. 11, article 152, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  91. J. D. Mosley, S. L. van Driest, E. K. Larkin et al., “Mechanistic phenotypes: an aggregative phenotyping strategy to identify disease mechanisms using GWAS data,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 12, Article ID e81503, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2014 Helena Kuivaniemi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.