Short Cantilever Rock Beam Structure and Mechanism of Gob-Side Entry Retaining Roof in Reuse Period

Wu, Jingke; Dong, Yun; Chen, Jiarui; Zhang, Chunlei; Yin, Wei; Zhang, JiHua; Cheng, Yongzhen

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8835820

Shock and Vibration

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusions Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Rock Burst in Underground Engineering: Experiments and Analysis

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 | Article ID 8835820 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8835820

Short Cantilever Rock Beam Structure and Mechanism of Gob-Side Entry Retaining Roof in Reuse Period

Jingke Wu,^1,2,3Yun Dong,¹Jiarui Chen,¹Chunlei Zhang,¹Wei Yin,¹JiHua Zhang,¹and Yongzhen Cheng¹

Academic Editor: Xuesheng Liu

Received21 Sept 2020

Revised12 Oct 2020

Accepted19 Oct 2020

Published31 Oct 2020

Abstract

In the reuse stage of a gob-side entry retaining, failure of the structure and stability of the main roof have a significant effect on the safety of the advanced support and ventilation space at the working face. In this study, field investigation, theoretical analysis, and industrial experimentation were performed to analyse the fracture characteristics and formation process of the gob-side entry retaining roof during the reuse period. A dynamic-equilibrium mechanical model of the main roof structure is presented and the formation mechanisms of different types of short cantilever rock beam structures are clarified. The following major conclusions are drawn: (1) Three types of short cantilever rock beam structures occur in the main roof of a gob-side entry retaining during the reuse period, namely, the “short cantilever-articulated rock beam” structure, “short cantilever step rock beam (type I)” structure, and “short cantilever step rock beam (type II)” structure. (2) The stability criterion for these three short cantilever rock beam structures was also determined; that is, when the sliding instability coefficient K ≥ 1, the short cantilever-articulated rock beam structure will form, and when the sliding instability coefficient K < 1, the short cantilever step rock beam (type I or II) will form. (3) The governing law for the thicknesses of the main roof, immediate roof, and coal seam of the short cantilever rock beam structure was clarified; namely, the K-value gradually increases with increases in the thickness of the coal seam, drops sharply and then decreases gradually with increases in the thickness of the main roof, and decreases slowly with increases in the thickness of the immediate roof. The research results were validated at the gob-side entry retaining project in the Huainan mining area and have theoretical significance and reference value for roadway support projects with similar conditions.

1. Introduction

With the continuous improvements in coal mining methods and mechanical equipment, gob-side entry retaining has become an important factor in the scientific and technical development of coal mining in China [1, 2]. This technique has been widely applied and has a prominent position in China’s coal industries, including the China Energy Investment Group, Shandong Energy Xinwen Mining Group, China Pingmei Shenma Group, Jizhong Energy Group, and Huainan Mining Group. Numerous achievements have been made in the control theory and support technology of gob-side entry retaining in recent years. For example, Kang et al. [3, 4] proposed a support design principle for gob-side entry retaining based on the analysis of the deformation failure characteristics and control methods of the surrounding rock during the processes of driving, retaining, and reusing the roadway. Zhang et al. [5] introduced the control principle of integral reinforcement for gob-side entry retaining, based on a matching principle of support system stiffness on the roadway side. Han et al. [6] conducted a physical simulation experiment to illustrate the characteristics of the collapse of sequential overlying strata in goaf and its superposition disturbance mechanism with respect to gob-side entry retaining. Xue et al. [7] established a mechanical model of the rupture of an overburden structure with a 10 m thick hard roof and clarified the balance principle for a cantilever structure at the side of the goaf. Li et al. [8, 9] established a mechanical model of the key block and immediate roof and analysed the interaction mechanism between the key block and the surrounding rock of the gob-side entry retaining. Gao et al. [10] explored the transmission of blast stress waves in deep holes and the development law of rock mass fractures and explained the pressure relief principle of the deep-hole blasting of a gob-side entry retaining under a hard composite roof. Zhang and Chen [11, 12] established a mechanical model of gob-side entry retaining with hard roof cutting and presented a formula for calculating the cutting resistance of the filling body. Zhang et al. [13] studied the stability of the surrounding rock during reuse of a roadway constructed by roof cutting in a three-soft coal seam and clarified the spatial-temporal evolution law of the stress field and displacement field of the surrounding rock during the reuse period. He et al. [14–16] put forward a creative theory for roof cutting a short wall beam. On this basis, the technique of no-pillar mining was developed with gob-side entry obtained by advanced roof caving (110 method), which has been successfully applied and popularised in many mining areas. Wang et al. [17] studied the rheological breaking features of hard roof in gob. Deng et al. [18] studied the stress evolution and failure behaviour of the surrounding rock of the gob-side retaining entry with different depths, gob filling ratios, and gob-side filling widths and strengths. Based on the above results, systematic studies have been conducted on all stages of gob-side entry retaining, including the early, middle, and late stages. Research on the reuse of gob-side entry retaining has mainly focused on the stress distribution and deformation failure of the surrounding rock. Few studies have addressed the failure mechanism and stability of the precracked roof structure of a gob-side entry retaining during the reuse period, which requires further exploration.

In the reuse stage of gob-side entry retaining, the failure pattern and stability of the main roof structure have a great effect on the safety of the advanced support at the working face. In this work, the dynamic failure process and failure mechanism of the main roof in a gob-side entry retaining are investigated and classified at different stages of the mining process, with particular attention given to the formation process of the rock beam of the precracked main roof during the reuse period. A mechanical model is established of the rock beam structure in the precracked main roof during the reuse period to investigate the mutual feedback mechanical behaviour of the key blocks in the main roof. The formation conditions and influence factors of the rock beam structure in the precracked main roof during the reuse period are also clarified. Taking the gob-side entry retaining in the Huainan mining area as the engineering background, the research results were validated in industrial experiments.

2. Engineering Geological Conditions

Coal working face 1252 (1) and its adjacent coal face 1242 (1) in the eastern district of the Panyi coal mine are monoclinal structures with the main mining coal seam #11-2. At the coal working face 1242 (1), the average dip angle of the coal seam is 4°, the ground elevation is +21.5–22.1 m, the floor elevation at the coal working area ranges from −738.3 m to −823.1 m, and the average buried depth is greater than 800 m. The maximum horizontal principal stress, which is distributed roughly in the east-west direction, is about 33.43 MPa, and its vertical stress is 19.80 MPa.

Figure 1 shows an illustration of the roadway layout of coal working faces 1252 (1) and 1242 (1). When coal working face 1252 (1) was being mined, a gob-side entry retaining with a total length of 1150 m was established in the section track drift, with the cross section size of the gob-side entry retaining of 4.2 m (width) × 3.2 m (height). Special filling materials for the coal mine are selected in accordance with the design of the roadside filling body, with the compressive strength of the concrete made from these materials reaching 32–36 MPa for a 3.0 m width of the filling body. The support of the roof and coal side is achieved using a “three-high” anchor bolt, large-diameter anchor cable, hollow grouting anchor cable, and grouting injection. To improve the overlying rock structure and stress environment of the gob-side entry retaining, the presplitting blasting technique was used to force the hard roof of the gob-side entry retaining to develop a cracked weak surface at a certain height range. After the exhaustion of coal working face 1252 (1), the gob-side entry retaining has continued to be used as a section track drift of coal working face 1242 (1).

(a)

(b)

3. Formation Mechanism of Short Cantilever Rock Beam Structure of the Main Roof during Reuse Period

Combining the failure forms of the presplitting gob-side entry retaining roof during the reuse period, theoretical analysis indicates the formation of three types of short cantilever rock beam structures in the gob-side entry retaining roof in the reuse period, namely, the “short cantilever-articulated rock beam” structure, “short cantilever step rock beam (type I)” structure, and “short cantilever step rock beam (type II)” structure.

3.1. Formation Mechanism of Short Cantilever-Articulated Rock Beam Structure

3.1.1. Formation Process of Short Cantilever-Articulated Rock Beam

In the first stage, when retaining the roadway along the goaf during mining of coal working face 1252 (1), the precracked roof behind the coal working face was broken along the weak fracture surface by the periodic weighting action, which formed key blocks A, B, and C that were hinged together. Among them, key block A was located directly above the reserved roadway and formed a short cantilever on the right side of the filling body, which successfully protected the retained roadway inside the overlying arch structure, as shown in Figure 2(a). This structure optimises the stress environment of the gob-side entry retaining roof. However, key block B continues to exert a downward “pressure” effect on key block A.

(a)

(b)

(c)

In the second stage, when the gob-side entry was reused, the roadway roof in front of coal working face 1242 (1) was affected by the advanced abutment pressure of the coal working face and the residual abutment pressure of the stope side of the previous coal working face, which formed a stress superposition zone that connects the leading stress area with the stress superposition area. As shown in Figure 2(b), this formed region is close to the advanced support area at the end of the coal working face, which will greatly affect the stability of the gob-side entry retaining roof, leading to “secondary breaking” and rotary subsidence of the short cantilever rock beam in the advanced support area.

As the working face continues to advance, key block B rotates anticlockwise as key block A rotates clockwise and sinks. At this point, the hinged points of key blocks A and B gradually transferred from a lower to an upper hinge point. The short cantilever-articulated rock beam structure, which is shown in Figure 2(c), also remains in a constant state of high-stress dynamic balance. This structure has a very harmful effect on the advanced support area of the gob-side entry retaining during the reuse period and greatly increases its instability, such that the roadway space can be greatly reduced or even collapse, causing the roof to fall.

3.1.2. Mechanical Analysis of Short Cantilever-Articulated Rock Beam Structure

(1) Establishment of Mechanical Model. Based on the above analysis, here, a mechanical model is established of the short cantilever-articulated rock beam structure of the gob-side entry retaining roof during the reuse period. The interactional relationship among key blocks A, B, and C is analysed from the mechanistic perspective. As shown in Figure 3, the stability of a short cantilever-articulated rock beam structure is determined by the stability of key blocks A and B:(1)The subsidence (W₂) of key block B is related to the thickness (h₀) of the immediate roof, mining height (m), and rock fragmentation coefficient (k_p), for which the relationship formula is as follows [19]:(2)During the reuse period of the gob-side entry retaining, when the rotation angle (θ₁) of key block A is zero, the maximum rotation angle (θ_2max) of key block B can be calculated as follows: where L₂ is the length of key block B. A rotation angle (θ₂) of 0 ≤ θ₂ < θ_2max indicates that key block B is in contact with gangue and is supported by the gangue falling from the goaf. In this situation, the length (b) of key block B is expressed as b = L₂cosθ₂. The support reaction (R₂) of the gangue in the goaf is calculated using the following formula [20]: where is the support strength of the falling gangue.(3)Based on the geometric contact relation of the key block rotary motion, the approximate height of the extruded contact surface of the corner in the key block is given by where h (m) is the thickness of the main roof, L₁ (m) is the length of key block A, and θ₁ is the rotation angle of key block A.(4)The fracture line of key block A is assumed to be located at the elastoplastic interface of the coal side. According to the ultimate equilibrium theory, the width (x₀) of the limit equilibrium zone in the coal side can be calculated using the following formula [21]: where A is the lateral pressure, H (m) is the mining depth, c₀ (MPa) is the degree of cohesion of the coal-rock interface, φ₀ is the internal friction angle of the coal-rock interface, p_x is the supporting strength of the coal side, k is the maximum stress concentration factor, and γ (kN/m³) is the average volume weight of the overlying rock.(5)In the short cantilever step rock beam structure, the length of key block A is calculated using where c (m) is the roadway width, d is the width of the filling body, and l is the short cantilever length of the main roof at the side of the goaf.

(a)

(b)

For the short cantilever-articulated rock beam structure of the gob-side entry retaining roof during the reuse period, a second break of key block A occurs. Three kinds of changes are evident in the form and load-bearing of its structural motion.

When θ₂ = θ_2max and b = 0, this indicates that although a second break occurs in key block A, there is no obvious inclined subsidence of the roof. The roadway maintains full roof protection.

When 0 < θ₂ < θ_2max and 0 < b < L, this indicates that when a second break of key block A occurs, obvious inclined subsidence of the roof occurs. The surrounding rock in the advanced support area exhibits relatively large deformation, which makes maintenance operations difficult.

When θ₂ = 0 and b = L, this indicates that when a second break of key block A occurs, severe inclined subsidence of the roof will occur, as well as severe deformation of the surrounding rock in the advanced support area, which makes maintenance operations very difficult.

Thus, it can be seen that as key block A sinks at a clockwise incline, key block B rotates anticlockwise. At this time, with a gradually increasing value of θ₁, the rotation angle (θ₂) of key block B decreases gradually and the area of key block B in contact with gangue increases. Correspondingly, the supporting strength R₂ of the gangue on key block B increases, which effectively improves the supporting force of key block A. However, the increased θ₁ value causes a serious incline of the gob-side entry retaining roof during the reuse period, which is not conducive to the stability of the surrounding rock in the advanced support section of the gob-side entry retaining.

(2) Stress Analysis of Key Blocks. As shown in Figure 3, a stress analysis was performed of the short cantilever-articulated rock beam structure. To simplify the calculation, L = L₁ = L₂. Based on the bending equilibrium of a square (∑M_O = 0 and ∑M_O1 = 0) with points O and O₁, the formulas for determining the horizontal thrust (T) and friction shear (Q_O2) are obtained:where W₁ is the rotary subsidence height of key block A, R₁ is the supporting reaction force of the immediate roof, and P₁ (P₁ = qL₁) and P₂ (P₂ = qL₂) are the load and self-weight of key blocks A and B, respectively.

According to the geometric correspondence between the sinking amount of key block and the length of key block, W₁ = Lsinθ₁, W₂ = L(sinθ₁ + sinθ₂), and sinθ₂ 0.25sinθ₁ are brought into formulas (7) and (8). Given ∑F_y = 0, the final horizontal thrust (T) and friction shear (Q₀₂) can be derived from formulas (9) and (10):

(3) Analysis of Stability of Short Cantilever-Articulated Rock Beam Structure. During the reuse of the gob-side entry retaining, the stability of key block A is directly related to the stability of the surrounding rock. Using the “S–R” stability theory for a voussoir beam structure [22], the extrusion deformation instability and sliding instability of key block A in the short cantilever-articulated rock beam structure can be obtained.(1)Extrusion deformation instability An increase in the rotation angle of key block A will lead to deformation and instability of the short cantilever-articulated rock beam structure. The conditions for maintaining the stability of the structure are expressed as follows: where ƞσ_c is the extrusion strength of the end angle of the key block. Substituting formula (9) into formula (11), the supporting reaction force (R_1i) in the presence of extrusion deformation instability can be calculated using(2)Sliding instability The maximal shear force (Q_O) on the short cantilever-articulated rock beam structure occurs at point O. To prevent instability of key block A in the structure at point O, the following condition must be met:where tanφ is the frictional coefficient between the key blocks, which has been determined in the laboratory to be 0.5.

Substituting formulas (9) and (10) into formula (13), the range of the supporting reaction force (R_1i) in the presence of sliding instability can be calculated using the following formula:

If key block A is prevented from slipping and buckling and from buckling the extrusion deformation, the supporting reaction force of the immediate roof is at least as follows:

3.2. Formation Mechanism of Short Cantilever Step Rock Beam Structure

3.2.1. Formation Process of Short Cantilever Step Rock Beam Structure

In the first stage, during the gob-side entry retaining process, with the mining of coal working face 1252 (1), the precracked roof behind the coal working face was broken along the fissure plane by the strong mining activity. The right side of key block B was pressed onto the caved gangue. Simultaneously, a sliding phenomenon occurred at the left side, forming steps between key blocks A and B, as shown in Figure 4(a). Key block A was located directly above the gob-side entry retaining and formed a short cantilever on the right side of the filling body to successfully protect the retaining roadway inside the overlying arch structure. This structure is known as the short cantilever step rock beam. Although key block B continues to exert downward pressure on key block A, the downward force of key block B is significantly reduced compared with that of the short cantilever-articulated rock beam structure.

(a)

(b)

In the second stage, during the reuse period of the gob-side entry retaining, the short cantilever beam may break again above the advanced support area of the gob-side entry retaining. As the coal working face continues to advance, key block B rotates anticlockwise when key block A rotates clockwise to sink. The hinge points of key blocks A and B gradually transfer from bottom to top. Clearly, after key block B with reverse rotation becomes effectively stable, the effect of key block B on A changes from pressure to support, effectively preventing key block A from sinking further. Figure 4(b) shows the final structure, which increases the stability of the advanced support area.

3.2.2. Mechanical Analysis of Short Cantilever Step Rock Beam Structure

Based on the above analysis, a mechanical model is established for the short cantilever step rock beam structure of the gob-side entry retaining roof during the reuse period, as shown in Figure 5.

The rotary sinking angle (θ₁) of key block A can be calculated usingwhere s can be derived from the following equation:where s (m) is the step height between key blocks A and B, 0 ≤ s < W₂, and e (m) is the width of the weak surface after presplitting blasting of the main roof.

(1) Stress Analysis of Short Cantilever Step Rock Beam (Type I) Structure. After key block B falls, a step is formed between key blocks B and A, with key block A supported by key block B at point O₁. At this time, key blocks A and B remain hinged by the interaction of horizontal forces, the mechanical model of which is shown in Figure 6.

Based on the model of the structural mechanics of the voussoir beam, the relationship can be approximately simplified as R₂ = P₂, Q_O2 = 0, and L = L₁ = L₂. As shown in Figure 6, given ∑F_y = 0 and ∑M_O = 0, the friction shear (Q_O) and horizontal thrust (T) can be calculated using

In the short cantilever step rock beam structure, key block A is supported by key block B at point O₁, which is characterised only by sliding instability (no rotary instability). It is easily determined that the maximum shear (Q_O) of the short cantilever step rock beam structure occurs at point O. After substituting formulas (18) and (19) into formula (13), the supporting reaction force (R₁) can be calculated using

(2) Stress Analysis of Short Cantilever Step Rock Beam (Type II) Structure. After key block B falls, key blocks A and B are fully disconnected with no horizontal force transfer between them. The mechanical model of the short cantilever step rock beam (type II) structure can thus be simplified to the stress model of key block A shown in Figure 7.

In the short cantilever step rock beam (type II) structure, when the horizontal thrust (T) is zero, given ∑M_O = 0, the stability of key block A can be obtained using

3.3. Discrimination of Structure of Short Cantilever Rock Beam

3.3.1. Discriminant Mechanical Model of Short Cantilever Rock Beam Structure

Based on the analysis of the structural formation mechanism of the short cantilever rock beam of the gob-side entry retaining roof during the reuse period, the stability of key block B is considered to affect the structural form of the short cantilever rock beam. A corresponding mechanical model was established to analyse the structural form of the short cantilever rock beam of the gob-side entry retaining during the reuse period, as shown in Figure 8.

Suppose that the supporting force of the gangue in the goaf on key block B is zero and the shear force on key block B is Q_O2. When key block B in the short cantilever rock beam structure is in a limit equilibrium state, formula (22) can be derived on the basis of ∑M_O2 = 0:

The formula for calculating horizontal thrust (T) is as follows [23, 24]:

In conjunction with formulas (22) and (23), the shear force (Q_O2) can be derived using

Based on the analysis of the formation mechanism of the short cantilever rock beam structure of the gob-side entry retaining roof during the reuse period, the stability requirements of the short cantilever-articulated rock beam and short cantilever step rock beam structures are considered to control the sliding and instability of the gob-side entry retaining roof. If key block B slides to a certain height or less than that height and then becomes stable again, the limit equilibrium condition is Ttanφ ≥ Q_O1. The sliding instability coefficient (K) can be calculated as follows:and when K ≥ 1, the short cantilever-articulated rock beam structure is formed without the sliding instability of key block B, whereby the higher the K-value is, the better the structural stability is. When K < 1, key block B will slip and become unstable.

During the sliding process of key block B, if the step hinges of key blocks A and B are once again in the equilibrium state, then a short cantilever step rock beam (type I) structure will form. At this time, the effect of key block B on key block A changes from pressure to “branch,” which is beneficial to the stability of the gob-side entry retaining roof. If the horizontal force between the key blocks tends to 0 after the rotary sinking of key block B, then a short cantilever step rock beam (type II) structure will form.

3.3.2. Limit Equilibrium Criterion for Short Cantilever Rock Beam Structure

Substituting formulas (1), (2), (4), (23), and (24) into formula (25) with k_p = 1.05 and tanφ = 0.5, the formula for calculating the sliding instability coefficient (K) is as follows:and, based on the equilibrium condition of the voussoir beam structure, that is, L > 2h, the ultimate formula for determining the equilibrium of the short cantilever rock beam structure is as follows:

In this section, the occurrence of coal-series strata in the gob-side entry retaining in the Huainan mining area is considered and the fracture structure of the main roof is discussed. The variation range of relevant parameters at the coal working face can be summarised as follows: the thicknesses (m) of the coal seams in different sections are 1.5 m, 2.1 m, 2.5 m, 2.8 m, and 3.5 m; the mudstone thickness (h) of the immediate roof varies from 0 to 10; and the mudstone thickness (h) of the main roof varies from 0 to 20. The variation law of the limit equilibrium state of the short cantilever rock beam structure is obtained by introducing the relevant parameters into formula (27) and then drawing 3D images, as shown in Figure 9.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

As the thicknesses of the coal seams in Figures 9(a)–9(e) vary from 1.5 m to 3.5 m, the limit equilibrium value (K) of the short cantilever rock beam structure increases gradually. The K-value curve shows a sharp and then a gentle decline with increases in the thickness (h) of the main roof. Simultaneously, this curve shows a slow decrease with increases in the thickness (h₀) of the immediate roof. As the K-value decreases, the overburden structure gradually changes from a short cantilever-articulated rock beam structure (K ≥ 1) to a short cantilever step rock beam structure (K < 1).

4. Influence of Short Cantilever Rock Beam on Roadway Side Support Structure

4.1. Calculation of Filling-Body Load beside Roadway

Based on the structural characteristics of the surrounding rock of the gob-side entry retaining, a mechanical model of the surrounding-rock support structure is established, as shown in Figure 10.

Given ∑Fy = 0 and ∑M_Left = 0, the formula for calculating the filling-body load beside the roadway is given by formulas (28) and (29):where h₀ and P₀ are the thickness and deadweight of the immediate roof, respectively, R₁ is the reaction load of key block A on the upper boundary of the immediate roof, and F₀ and F_d are the force of the coal-side support to the immediate roof and supporting resistance of the filling body, respectively, with R₁`, F₀, and F_d given by R₁` = -R₁, F₀ = f₀x₀, and F_d = f_dd. The residual bending moment at the left end of the immediate roof is ignored.

Based on formulas (28) and (29), the support resistance of the filling body can be easily derived as follows:

Formulas (15), (20), and (21) are introduced into formula (30). respectively, to obtain the formula for calculating filling loads F_d1, F_d2, and F_d3, respectively, which correspond to the short cantilever-articulated rock beam, short cantilever step rock beam (type I), and short cantilever step rock beam (type II) structures.

If key block A has no slipping instability or extrusion deformation instability, the supporting resistance of the filling body can be calculated as follows:and, given F_d = f_dd, the above formula can be simplified as follows:

During the reuse period of the gob-side entry retaining, the short cantilever rock beam structure changes depending on the overburden conditions in different sections, so each of the short cantilever-articulated rock beam, short cantilever step rock beam (type I), and short cantilever step rock beam (type II) structures can occur. Therefore, to ensure the stability of the overburden structure, the support resistance value on the roadway side is generally determined based on the theoretical maximum value.

4.2. Load of Filling Body under Different Short Cantilever Rock Beam Structures

The total length of the gob-side entry retaining in coal working face 1242 (1) is 1150 m, with three typical sections with different roof conditions. In Section 1, m = 2.1 m, h = 8 m, and h₀ = 3 m. In Section 2, m = 2.5 m, h = 5 m, and h₀ = 7 m. In Section 3, m = 2.8 m, h = 7 m, and h₀ = 6 m. Other parameters are as follows: A = 0.4, φ₀ = 36°, k = 2.5, γ = 24 kN/m³, H = 800 m, c₀ = 0.3 MPa, p_x = 0.2 MPa, c = 4.2 m, l = 3 m, d = 3.0 m, q = 150 kN/m, h₀ = 2 m, k_p = 1.05, ƞ = 0.8, = 1.5 MPa/m², and σ_c = 60 MPa. These parameters are calculated using formulas (1)–(32), and the sliding instability coefficient (K) values and the filling-body loads are summarised in Table 1.

Given the sliding instability coefficient K-value of the short cantilever rock beam structure, the roof structures of sections 1, 2, and 3 correspond to the short cantilever-articulated rock beam structure, short cantilever step rock beam (type I) structure, and short cantilever step rock beam (type II) structure, respectively. The loading value of the filling body in the short cantilever-articulated rock beam structure is more than three times that of the short cantilever step rock beam (type I or II) structure. As such, the structural form of the short cantilever step rock beam is clearly the most favourable for gob-side entry retaining during the reuse period.

4.3. Analysis of Roadway Side Support of Short Cantilever Rock Beam Structure

4.3.1. Load on the Filling Body

During the reuse period of the gob-side entry retaining at coal working face 1241 (1), a group of stations for monitoring the filling-body load was arranged on the roadside filling bodies of sections 1, 2, and 3. Three YZ-type hydraulic pillows with 3 m spacing were arranged in each test station to observe the loads on the filling bodies.

Figure 11 presents the final observation data obtained by the test stations, in which it can be easily seen that the average readings of the three YZ-type hydraulic pillows in sections 1, 2, and 3 are, respectively, 0.63 MPa, 2.74 MPa, and 2.27 MPa. The average readings in sections 2 and 3 are 4.35 and 3.60 times higher than those in section 1, respectively. These results prove that the uniform load on the filling body in the short cantilever-articulated rock beam structure is more than three times those of the short cantilever step rock beam (types I and II) structures during the reuse period of the gob-side entry retaining. Moreover, the range and degree of violent activity of the short cantilever-articulated rock beam structure are greater than those of the short cantilever step rock beam (types I and II) structures.

(a)

(b)

(c)

4.3.2. Deformation and Destruction of Gob-Side Entry Retaining during Reuse Period

During the reuse period of the gob-side entry retaining, the deformation and failure of the surrounding rock within 140 m of the front of coal working face 1242 (1) are shown in Figure 12.

(a)

(b)

The average subsidence and rotation tilt of the roof are about 294 mm and 8–13°, respectively. Although the filling body is inclined at the same angle as the roof, its integrity is good. The average displacement values of the coal side and floor are approximately 365 mm and 276 mm, respectively. Figure 13 shows an illustration of the good maintenance state of the surrounding rock of the gob-side entry retaining in the reuse period, wherein the cross section of the gob-side entry retaining meets mining requirements.

(a)

(b)

5. Conclusions

(1)In this paper, the formation process of the short cantilever rock beam of the gob-side entry retaining during the reuse period was clarified, in which three types of short cantilever rock beam structures occur in the gob-side entry retaining roof, namely, short cantilever-articulated rock beam, short cantilever step rock beam (type I), and short cantilever step rock beam (type II) structures.(2)To obtain the limit equilibrium criterion of the different short cantilever beam structures, mechanical models were established for the short cantilever beam structures and surrounding-rock supporting structure of the gob-side entry retaining during the reuse period. The results reveal that when the sliding instability coefficient K ≥ 1, a short cantilever-articulated rock beam structure forms. When the sliding instability coefficient K < 1, a short cantilever step rock beam (type I or II) structure forms.(3)The governing law for the stability of the thicknesses of the main roof, immediate roof, and coal seam on the short cantilever rock beam structure was clarified, which is mainly reflected in the following three respects: (1) with increases in the thickness of the coal seam, the limit equilibrium value (K) of the short cantilever rock beam structure increases gradually; (2) the K-value curve shows a sharp and then a gentle decline with the increasing thickness (h) of the main roof; and (3) the K-value curve shows a slow decreasing trend with the increasing thickness (h₀) of the immediate roof. As the K-value decreases, the overburden structure gradually changes from a short cantilever-articulated rock beam structure (K ≥ 1) to a short cantilever step rock beam structure (K < 1).

Data Availability

All data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article, and there are not any restrictions on data access.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This research was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 51804129, 51904110, 51904112, and 51904113), the General Program of China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (no. 2020M671301), the Postdoctoral Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (nos. 2019K139 and 2019Z107), the Huai'an Science and Technology Plan project (no. HAB201836), the Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions of China (Project Principals Chunlei Zhang), the Jiangsu Natural Science Foundation Project (no. BK20181061), the Industry Education Research Cooperation Projects in Jiangsu Province (no. BY2020007), and the 2019 Huaishang Talent Plan Program (Project Principals Jingke Wu).

References

S. R. Xie, Q. Zhang, D. D. Chen et al., “Research and application of asymmetric anchorage deep beam bearing structure model in gob-side entry retaining roof,” Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 298–310, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
G. R. Feng, Y. Q. Ren, and P. F. Wang, “Stress distribution and deformation characteristics of roadside backfill body for gob-side entry of fully-mechanized caving in thick coal seam,” International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1109–1119, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
H. P. Kang, D. L. Niu, Z. Zhang et al., “Characteristics of surrounding rock deformation and supporting technology of gob-side entry retaining in deep coal mine,” Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 1977–1987, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
H. P. Kang, L. X. Yan, X. P. Guo et al., “Characteristics of surrounding rock deformation and reinforcement technology of retained entry in working face with multi-entry layout,” Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 2022–2036, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
N. Zhang, C. L. Han, J. G. Kan et al., “Theory and practice of surrounding rock control for pillarless gob-side entry retaining,” Journal of China Coal Society, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 1635–1641, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
C. L. Han, N. Zhang, Z. Ran, R. au, and H. Q Yang, “Superposed disturbance mechanism of sequential overlying strata collapse for gob-side entry retaining and corresponding control strategies,” Journal of Central South University, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 2258–2271, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. H. Xue and C. R. Duan, “Technologies of gob-side entry retaining with no-pillar in condition of overlying and thick-hard roof,” Journal of China Coal Society, vol. 39, no. S2, pp. 378–383, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. F. Li and X. Z. Hua, “Mechanical analysis of stability of key blocks of overlying strata for gob-side entry retaining and calculating width of roadside backfill,” Rock and Soil Mechanics, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 1134–1140, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. F. Li and X. Z. Hua, “Mechanical analysis on the stability of surrounding rock structure of gob-side entry retaining,” Journal of China Coal Society, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 2262–2269, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Gao, Z. G. Liu, D. S. Deng et al., “Application of deep borehole blasting to gob-side entry retaining forced roof caving in hard and compound roof deep well,” Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 1588–1594, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
Z. Z. Zhang, J. B. Bai, Y. Chen et al., “Shallow-hole blasting mechanism and its application for gob-side entry retaining with thick and hard roof,” Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 35, no. S1, pp. 3008–3017, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Chen, S. P. Hao, and Y. T. Chen, “Study on the application of short-hole blasting with guide hole to roof cutting pressure relief of gob-side entry retaining,” Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 253–259, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Zhang, F. x. Shen, X. M. Sun et al., “Stress and deformation law of surrounding rock in the second reuse of roadway formed by roof cutting in the “three soft” coal seam,” Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 247–254, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
M. C. He, Y. J. Wang, J. Yang et al., “Zonal characteristics and its influence factors of working face pressure using roof cutting and pressing-relief mining method with no pillar and road way formed automatically,” Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 1157–1165, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
M. C. He, Y. B. Gao, J. Yang et al., “Engineering experimentation of gob-side entry retaining formed by roof cutting and pressure release in a thick-seam fast-extracted mining face,” Rock and Soil Mechanics, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 254–264, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. J. Wang, M. C. He, J. Yang et al., “The structure characteristics and deformation of “short cantilever beam” using a non-pillar mining method with gob-side entry formed automatically,” Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 718–726+759, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
J. A. Wang, D. Z. Li, and X. C. Shang, “Creep failure of roof stratum above mined-out area,” Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 533–546, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. J. Deng, C. W. Dong, Z. X. Yuan et al., “Deformation behavior of gob-side filling body of gob-side retaining entry in the deep backfilling workface,” Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 62–72, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
M. G. Qian, Collection of Papers on Strata Control and Scientific Coal Mining, China University of Mining and Technology Press, Xuzhou, China, 2011.
M. G. Qian, P. W. Shi, and J. L. Xu, Mining Pressure and Strata Control, China University of Mining and Technology Press, Xuzhou, China, 2010.
C. L. Han, N. Zhang, B. Y. Li, and X. G. Zheng, “Pressure relief and structure stability mechanism of hard roof for gob-side entry retaining,” Journal of Central South University, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 4445–4455, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. L. Xu, W. B. Zhu, X. Z. Wang et al., “Classification of key strata structure of overlying strata in shallow coal seam,” Journal of China Coal Society, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 865–870, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
J. L. Xu, D. Y. Xuan, W. B. Zhu et al., “Partial backfilling coal mining technology based on key strata control,” Journal of Mining and Strata Control Engineering, vol. 1, no. 1, Article ID 013504, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
N. Jiang, C. Wang, H. Pan et al., “Modeling study on the influence of the strip filling mining sequence on mining-induced failure,” Energy Science & Engineering, vol. 1, pp. 1–17, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2020 Jingke Wu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

478

Downloads

627

Citations