The Scientific World Journal

The Scientific World Journal / 2013 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 718061 | 8 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/718061

Local Gene Transfer of OPG Prevents Joint Damage and Disease Progression in Collagen-Induced Arthritis

Academic Editor: M. Borset
Received05 Aug 2013
Accepted04 Sep 2013
Published03 Oct 2013

Abstract

This study examined the influence of osteoprotegerin (OPG) gene transfer on a murine collagen-induced arthritis model. A single periarticular injection of AAV-OPG or AAV-LacZ on the arthritic paw successfully incorporated the exogenous gene to the local tissue and resulted in marked transgene expression in the joint homogenate for at least three weeks. Clinical disease scores were significantly improved in OPG treated mice starting at 28-day post-treatment ( ). Histological assessment demonstrated that OPG gene transfer dramatically protected mice from erosive joint changes compared with LacZ controls ( ), although treatment appeared less effective on the local inflammatory progress. MicroCT data suggested significant protection against subchondral bone mineral density changes in OPG treated CIA mice. Interestingly, mRNA expressions of IFN-g and MMP3 were noticeably diminished following OPG gene transfer. Overall, gene transfer of OPG effectively inhibited the arthritis-associated periarticular bone erosion and preserved the architecture of arthritic joints, and the study provides evidence that the cartilage protection of the OPG gene therapy may be associated with the down-regulation of MMP3 expression.

1. Introduction

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is one of the most common forms of arthritis that affects more than two million Americans. It is characterized by chronic inflammation of the joint(s) with severe pain and swelling, impaired functions, and eventually joint distortion [13]. Bone destruction is a frequent and clinically serious event in patients with RA. Studies have shown that many proinflammatory cytokines and mediators such as macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF), the receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand (RANKL), TNF, IL-1, and IL-17 play dominant roles in the pathogenesis of arthritis-associated bone loss [1, 3]. RANKL expression was documented at the sites of active bone erosions [4]. The main sources of RANKL are osteoblasts but RANKL is also expressed in synovial cells, activated T cells, mature B cells, and natural killer cells [58]. Expression of RANKL is up-regulated by parathyroid hormone, 1,25(OH)2D3, and several proinflammatory cytokines, including IL-1, IL-6, IL-17, and TNF-α [912]. RANKL functions both as a membrane anchored molecule and a soluble molecule. Both forms bind to RANK, the receptor of RANKL. RANKL and RANK are members of the TNF superfamily [13, 14]. RANK is expressed on osteoclast precursors and mature osteoclasts [15]. RANKL-RANK interaction is an essential factor during osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption [16]. Pettit et al. [17] reported that RANKL-deficient mice were protected from bone erosions in an experimental mouse arthritis, and similarly the RANKL-knockout mice developed severe osteopetrosis due to a complete lack of osteoclastogenesis [18]. RANKL also serves as survival factor and activates osteoclasts, suggesting its important role in the progression of rheumatoid arthritis.

Osteoprotegerin (OPG) is a naturally existing decoy receptor that binds RANKL without physiological signal transduction. OPG was initially identified as a soluble factor that was capable of inhibiting osteoclastogenesis in vitro [19, 20]. It binds to RANKL and competes for RANKL with RANK, which blunts osteoclastogenesis and blocks its biological signal transduction. OPG-deficient mice exhibit severe osteoporosis [21]. The significance of RANKL-RANK-OPG signaling in regulating the immune system of bone continues to emerge. The balance of RANKL to OPG ratio regulates osteoclastogenesis and bone modeling. In the complex system of bone remodeling, the RANKL/OPG pathway is the coupling factor between bone resorption and formation [22]. Ultimately, the balance between RANKL and OPG determines the degree of proliferation and activity of the osteoclasts [14].

Our hypothesis is that restoration of the ratio of RANKL: OPG by administration of exogenous OPG may be a potential therapy to protect against bone loss in RA. Due to the short half-life of biological agents and the chronic nature of the disease, gene therapy provides an attractive alternative to deliver gene to arthritic site where therapeutic protein (OPG) could be locally produced and executed. In this study, we examined the feasibility and efficacy of the adeno-associated virus (AAV)—mediated OPG gene transfer in a mouse collagen induced arthritis (CIA) model.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals

Female DBA/1 mice were obtained from Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) and housed in our pathogen-free barrier facility (12 hr light/12 hr dark cycle) and fed rodent chow. All animals were quarantined in the facility for two weeks prior to experimentation. The study was approved by the institutional Animal Investigation Committee (AIC).

2.2. Recombinant AAV Vectors

Generation and purification of the AAV-OPG-eGFP plasmid has been described previously [23]. The purified pAAV-CMV-OPG-IRES-EGFP was sent to the Gene Core Facility, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill for rAAV-OPG-IRES-EGFP packaging and purification using a helper virus-free method [24]. The titer of the resulting rAAV-OPG-IRES-EGFP was ~1 × 109/mL. AAV-LacZ vectors were purchased from the Gene Core Facility, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, with original titer of 1 × 1011/mL.

2.3. Induction and Assessment of CIA

The establishment of the CIA model was detailed previously [25]. Briefly, forty (40) female DBA/1 mice at 10–12 weeks of age were intradermally injected 100 μg type II bovine collagen (kindly provided by Dr. Marie Griffiths, University of Utah) in Freund’s complete adjuvant (FCA) at the base of the tail, followed by daily examination for the onset of the disease. Onset of CIA was determined upon observation of the first signs of definitive erythema and edema in the metatarsal or metacarpal regions of the paws. 100% of mice developed arthritis within 3 to 7 weeks after immunization. At the first appearance of clinical evidence of arthritis, mice were randomly divided into three groups, arthritic paws were injected periarticularly with either (1) AAV-OPG-eGFP at a titer of 108 cfu/mL ( ), (2) AAV-LacZ at a titer of 108 cfu/mL as viral controls ( ), or (3) virus-free medium as negative controls ( ).

Arthritic animals were clinically assessed 5 times a week and paw measurements were recorded 3 times a week for 8 weeks. The severity of arthritis in the affected paw was graded according to an established score system [25, 26] as follows: 0 = normal joint; 1 = mild/moderate visible edema and erythema; 2 = severe edema with distortion of paw and joint; and 3 = deformed paw or joint with ankylosis. The maximum score per mouse is 12 (4 paws) representing overall disease severity and progression in the animal.

All animals were sacrificed at week 8 after disease onset (except the group of mice for detection of transgene expression described in next paragraph). The arthritic paws were harvested and divided into 2 parts along the median longitudinal axis. One part was fixed in 10% formalin for histology process, while the remainder was stored at −80°C for molecular analyses.

2.4. Detection of Transgene Expression in Mouse Paw Tissues

To evaluate the transgene expression levels, two mice at each time were sacrificed at day 3, 7, 14, and 21 after in vivo AAV-OPG or AAV-LacZ vector transductions. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) were conducted on the supernatants of the paw tissues homogenates to examine OPG-transgene production. All antibodies for human OPG were obtained from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). Tests were performed using the standardized protocol previously described [27, 28], and the protein levels were estimated against the standard curve corun on the same ELISA plate.

2.5. Histological Analysis

Paws were decalcified, paraffin-embedded, and sectioned to 6 μm orientated longitudinally. The sections were routinely stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H & E). Toluidine blue staining was also performed for cartilage damage evaluation. Both H&E and Toluidine blue stained sections were examined to assess the severity of the arthritis using an established histological grading system [29]: (1)normal synovial membrane (2-3 cells thick) without cartilage changes,(2)inflammatory synovitis only, (3)pannus formation and superficial cartilage erosions,(4)major erosion of the cartilage and subchondral bone, (5)architectural changes and destructions.

2.6. MicroCT Analysis for Bone Mineral Density

An eXplore Locus Micro CT system (GE Medical Systems, London, ON, Canada) was used to evaluate bone mineral density changes during the experimental period. Mice were anesthetized (10 mg/kg of Xylazine and 120 mg/kg of Ketamine) and restrained during scans. The parameters for the scans were 45 μm isotropic voxel size, 400 projections, 400 ms exposure time, 80 KW voltages, and 450 μA current. Following acquisition and reconstruction of the 4 paws of each mouse, the image data were analyzed using a GEHC MicroView software with Analysis+ Version 1.0 (GE Healthcare, London, ON Canada) to generate VOI (volume of the interest) on the 2, 3, and 4 metatarsal or metacarpal joints (3 mm proximal and distal of the joint surface) and to calculate the bone mineral densities (BMD) of the subchondral bone within the VOI. The threshold was kept constant for all samples to eliminate the noise from the soft tissue.

2.7. Assessment of Gene Expression Profiles by RT-PCR

Real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was performed to assess the influence of the gene transfer to the local mouse paw tissue. Gene expression of OPG, LacZ in the paw tissues were determined, and changes in expression of some proinflammatory cytokines and mediators including IL-1, TNF, IL-6, MMP3, and IFN-γ were also examined. Joints were harvested from arthritic mice postmortem at 56 days after arthritic onset. Total RNA from paw tissue homogenates were extracted following the manufacturer’s instructions (Tel-Test, Friendswood, TX), and possible DNA contaminants were removed by RNase-free DNase (RQ1, Promega, Madison, WI, USA) treatment. The cDNA was reverse transcribed from 0.5 μg of total RNA in a 20 μL reaction mixture containing 1×PCR buffer, 500 μM of each of deoxynucleotide triphosphates, 0.5 units/μL of RNase inhibitor, 2.5 μM random hexamers, 5.5 mM MgCl2, and 1.25 units/μL of RT (Perkin-Elmer Cetus, Norwalk, CT). The reaction mixture was incubated in a Thermal Cycler (Perkin-Elmer Cetus) at 25°C for 10 minutes, 48°C for 25 minutes, followed by 95°C for 5 minutes. Real-time PCR was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To standardize target gene level with respect to variability in quality of RNA and cDNA, we used GAPDH, a housekeeping gene, as an internal control. Reaction mixtures of 25 μL included 12.5 μL of 2x SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (PE Biosystems, Foster City, CA), target gene primer pairs (at 400 nM final concentration), and 2 μL cDNA. The primer pairs of the target genes used in this study (Table 1) were designed using a software Primer3 (http://frodo.wi.mit.edu/) with sequences from GenBank, NIH (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), and constructed by Invitrogen (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY), with exception of primers for IL-1, TNF, and IL-6 which were purchased from Clontech Laboratories (Mountain View, CA). The reactions were run in MicroAmp optical 96-well reaction plates with MicroAmp optical caps for 40 cycles (95°C for 15 seconds, 60°C for 1 minute) in the ABI Prism 7700 Sequence Detector (Applied Biosystems) and the fluorescent signals were recorded dynamically. The values of threshold cycle (Ct) at which a statistically significant increase in reporter-dye signals is first detected, were recorded to calculate the relative quantification of target gene expression. With the Ct value of GAPDH as an internal control and mean Ct value of target gene expression from nonviral arthritic paw tissue as the calibrator samples (named 0% expression change), the comparative quantification of the target gene expressions of the samples from AAV-LacZ or AAV-OPG was calculated as described previously [30]. The reaction mixture after real-time PCR was electrophoresed on 1.8% agarose gels containing ethidium bromide to verify the correct amplification of the target gene.


TargetForward primerReverse primer

Human OPGGGCAACACAGCTCACAAGAACTGGGTTTGCATGCCTTTAT
Mouse MMP3GCCACTCCCTGGGACTCTACCACAGGGGATGCTGTGGGAGTTCCAT
Mouse IFN-γTGGAGGAACTGGCAAAAGGATGCGCTTCCTGAGGCTGGATTC
Mouse RANK GGGTGGGGCGCAGACTTCACATGCCAGCAGCCTGCACCAG
Mouse TRAPTCCTGGCTCAAAAAGCAGTTACATAGCCCACACCGTTCTC

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Power analysis (PS Power and Sample Size Calculations, http://biostat.mc.vanderbilt.edu/) was utilized to estimate that eight [8] mice per group were required for the study. Statistical analysis among groups was performed by one-way ANOVA test with the LSD formula for post hoc multiple comparisons (SPSS v16, Chicago, IL, USA). A -value of 0.05 was considered as significant difference. Data are expressed as mean ± standard error of means.

3. Results

3.1. Transgene Production

ELISA was performed to determine the transgene expression. In virus-transduced arthritic joint homogenate, human OPG levels were maintained for at least 21 days, with the peak at 7 days following gene transfer (Figure 1). OPG protein level in blood serum was minimum, showing local effects of therapy. Mouse paws receiving AAV-lacZ vector injections revealed positive blue colored LacZ expressing cells under X-gal stains, similar to the reported previously [25]. There was no evidence of X-gal positive staining in uninjected paws or remote organs.

3.2. Effects of OPG Gene Transfer on Clinical Progression of CIA

Therapeutic gene transfer of OPG significantly ameliorated the mean numbers of arthritic paws of each mouse during the disease progression (Figure 2(a)) and the mean arthritis scores of arthritic paws since the day that the first paw had arthritic changes (Figure 2(b)). The OPG gene transfer significantly diminished the severity of the disease progress as early as 3 weeks after onset.

3.3. Histological Assessment of CIA following OPG Gene Modification

Histological evaluation of the arthritic paws of negative control or LacZ-transduced mice revealed severe synovial inflammatory cellular infiltration and pannus formation, marked bone and cartilage erosion, and distortion of joint architecture (Figure 3). In vivo transduction of OPG dramatically protected against the cartilage and subchondral bone erosions (Figure 4, ), although there were no significant ameliorations among the histological scores on synovitis and pannus formation, in comparison with the control animals. Toluidine staining showed that OPG gene transfer also effectively protected against the articular cartilage erosions and preserved the joint space and overall architectures (Figure 3).

3.4. Bone Mineral Density Changes

MicroCT analysis was performed to quantify the subchondral bone mineral density (BMD) changes among groups of arthritic paws. Figure 5(a) illustrates an example of the 3-D VOI on an arthritic paw CT image, and the analysis suggested that OPG gene transduction effectively protected against the subchondral bone degradation of the arthritic paws compared to the controls (Figure 5(b), * ).

3.5. Molecular Analysis

Real-time PCR data suggested that there were significantly diminished mRNA expressions of TRAP, RANK, MMP3, and INFγ in the OPG-gene modified paw tissues, in comparison to the controls (Figure 6). While there was no significant influence of OPG gene transfer on TNF and IL-6 expression, in the local paw tissue, there was a reduction trend of IL-1 mRNA expression ( ).

4. Discussion

Rheumatoid arthritis is an autoimmune disease that affects about 1% of the worldwide population. Bone destruction and loss are a serious clinical event in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Local joint destruction can cause joint instability and disability. Studies have shown the importance of CD4+ T cells, B cells, and cytokines such as RNAKL, TNFα, IL-1, and IL-17 in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis [3]. Cytokines exert direct effects on various types of cells in joint including chondrocytes, macrophages, and synovial fibroblasts, resulting in local inflammation and pannus formation, and activating different intracellular pathways to initiate osteoclast differentiation and localized joint destruction [3]. Immune cells and cytokines are critically responsible for the changes in bone turnover and bone mass that occur in rheumatoid arthritis. The balance of osteoclastogenic and antiosteoclastogenic mediators, thus, decides the fate of bone destruction.

RANKL and macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) are critical factors in the differentiation and activation of osteoclasts [16]. Osteoclasts are the sole bone resorbing cells. RANKL plays a key role in bone resorption and it inserts its biological effects through binding to its receptor RANK on the surface of osteoclast precursors and mature osteoclasts, resulting in differentiation and activation of osteoclasts. Osteoprotegerin (OPG), a naturally present protein that binds RANKL without inserting downstream signal transduction [19], has been identified as a potent negative regulator of the osteoclastogenesis. Indeed, it is the balance between the expression of the stimulator of osteoclastogenesis RANKL and the inhibitor OPG that dictates the quantity of bone loss [31]. A recent study involving 64 RA patients with 60 healthy individuals indicated that there were significantly higher RANKL and lower OPG levels in sera from RA patients compared to those from healthy controls [32]. We hypothesized that locally elevating the OPG ratio over RANKL via viral vector-mediated OPG gene transfer would protect against and reverse the subchondral bone damages during the course of rheumatoid arthritis. Using the well-established collagen-induced arthritis model (CIA), this study clearly showed that over-expression of OPG significantly ameliorated the clinical course of CIA with relatively benign arthritis scores, and dramatically protected against subchondral bone loss and bone mineral density changes. Although OPG therapy alone appears to be not very effective in controlling the inflammatory natures of the disease such as synovitis and pannus formation, modification of OPG expression in the arthritis joint resulted in diminished gene expression of MMP3 and INF-γ. Since altered RANKL, OPG ratio blocked osteoclastogenesis in the arthritic paws (diminished TRAP and RANK expressions), the down-regulation of MMP3 and INF-γ may also due to reduction of the matured osteoclasts. This study also revealed that OPG gene transfer effectively protected against the articulating cartilage erosions. Diminishment of MMP3 and INF-γ gene expressions may be responsible for this therapeutic outcome. Further investigation is warranted for the underline molecular mechanism.

The major problems in the treatment regimes for chronic inflammatory and destructive disorders such as rheumatoid arthritis include the lack of adequate suppressive agents and specific therapeutic delivery systems. Although still in infancy with many potential safety issues, therapeutic gene delivery system appears to have many advantages. Viral or nonviral vector-mediated gene transfer provides a rather efficient approach to deliver therapeutic gene(s) to the site of disease which may produce the therapeutic protein(s) in a persistent and localized manner. AAV vectors have shown some distinct advantages over other viral vectors such as infecting both dividing and non-dividing host cells and only provoking a very limited host immune response. In the current study, a single injection of AAV-OPG into the first diseased mouse paw at the onset day resulted in satisfactory therapeutic effects through the course of the experimentation. The transgene product OPG protein level at the transduced joint tissue could be detected for more than 3 weeks, and the improved clinical outcome was obvious, starting at 3 weeks after gene modification and lasting till the end of the experiment. In addition, there was no detected dissemination of the exogenous gene expression in mouse serum and remote organs.

Overall, the current study suggests that the adeno-associated viral vector mediated in vivo gene transfer successfully transduced the transgene into arthritic joints which subsequently expressed OPG protein; the OPG gene transfer clearly ameliorated the disease progression in a mouse model of collagen-induced arthritis. Sustained OPG expression effectively inhibited the cartilage and subchondral bone erosions, preserved the architecture of arthritic joints, and maintained local bone mineral density. The therapeutic influence of OPG may be attributed to blockage of osteoclastogenesis and negative regulation of other arthritis-associated mediators such as IFN-γ and MMP3.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by a research grant from the Arthritis Foundation Michigan Chapter (to Shang-You Yang), and research funding from Orthopaedic Research Institute, Via Christi Wichita Hospitals. The authors wish to thank Dr. Bin Wu and Ms. Zheng Song for their excellent technical assistance.

References

  1. P. V. Rewatkar, G. R. Kokil, A. Verma, and S. Thareja, “Rheumatoid arthritis: a new challenge in coming era,” Mini Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 98–107, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  2. F. A. Wollheim, “Approaches to rheumatoid arthritis in 2000,” Current Opinion in Rheumatology, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 193–201, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. E. H. S. Choy and G. S. Panayi, “Cytokine pathways and joint inflamation in rheumatoid arthritis,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 344, no. 12, pp. 907–916, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. A. R. Pettit, N. C. Walsh, C. Manning, S. R. Goldring, and E. M. Gravallese, “RANKL protein is expressed at the pannus-bone interface at sites of articular bone erosion in rheumatoid arthritis,” Rheumatology, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 1068–1076, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. Y.-Y. Kong, H. Yoshida, I. Sarosi et al., “OPGL is a key regulator of osteoclastogenesis, lymphocyte development and lymph-node organogenesis,” Nature, vol. 397, no. 6717, pp. 315–323, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. Y. Li, G. Toraldo, A. Li et al., “B cells and T cells are critical for the preservation of bone homeostasis and attainment of peak bone mass in vivo,” Blood, vol. 109, no. 9, pp. 3839–3848, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. C. A. O'Brien, “Control of RANKL gene expression,” Bone, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 911–919, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. K. Söderströma, E. Stein, P. Colmenero et al., “Natural killer cells trigger osteoclastogenesis and bone destruction in arthritis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 107, no. 29, pp. 13028–13033, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. S. Kotake, N. Udagawa, N. Takahashi et al., “IL-17 in synovial fluids from patients with rheumatoid arthritis is a potent stimulator of osteoclastogenesis,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 103, no. 9, pp. 1345–1352, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  10. T. Nakashima, Y. Kobayashi, S. Yamasaki et al., “Protein expression and functional difference of membrane-bound and soluble receptor activator of NF-κB ligand: modulation of the expression by osteotropic factors and cytokines,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 275, no. 3, pp. 768–775, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. Y. Wittrant, Y. Gorin, S. Mohan, B. Wagner, and S. L. Abboud-Werner, “Colony-stimulating factor-1 (CSF-1) directly inhibits receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL) expression by osteoblasts,” Endocrinology, vol. 150, no. 11, pp. 4977–4988, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. H. Yasuda, N. Shima, N. Nakagawa et al., “Osteoclast differentiation factor is a ligand for osteoprotegerin/ osteoclastogenesis-inhibitory factor and is identical to TRANCE/RANKL,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 95, no. 7, pp. 3597–3602, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. D. T. Graves, T. Oates, and G. P. Garlet, “Review of osteoimmunology and the host response in endodontic and periodontal lesions,” Journal of Oral Microbiology, vol. 3, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. J. Lorenzo, M. Horowitz, and Y. Choi, “Osteoimmunology: interactions of the bone and immune system,” Endocrine Reviews, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 403–440, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. T. Nakashima and H. Takayanagi, “Osteoimmunology: crosstalk between the immune and bone systems,” Journal of Clinical Immunology, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 555–567, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. W. J. Boyle, W. S. Simonet, and D. L. Lacey, “Osteoclast differentiation and activation,” Nature, vol. 423, no. 6937, pp. 337–342, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. A. R. Pettit, H. Ji, D. Von Stechow et al., “TRANCE/RANKL knockout mice are protected from bone erosion in a serum transfer model of arthritis,” American Journal of Pathology, vol. 159, no. 5, pp. 1689–1699, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  18. W. C. Dougall, M. Glaccum, K. Charrier et al., “RANK is essential for osteoclast and lymph node development,” Genes and Development, vol. 13, no. 18, pp. 2412–2424, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. W. S. Simonet, D. L. Lacey, C. R. Dunstan et al., “Osteoprotegerin: a novel secreted protein involved in the regulation of bone density,” Cell, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 309–319, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  20. E. Tsuda, M. Goto, S.-I. Mochizuki et al., “Isolation of a novel cytokine from human fibroblasts that specifically inhibits osteoclastogenesis,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 234, no. 1, pp. 137–142, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. A. Mizuno, N. Amizuka, K. Irie et al., “Severe osteoporosis in mice lacking osteoclastogenesis inhibitory factor/osteoprotegerin,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 247, no. 3, pp. 610–615, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. L. J. Raggatt and N. C. Partridge, “Cellular and molecular mechanisms of bone remodeling,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 33, pp. 25103–25108, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. S.-Y. Yang, L. Mayton, B. Wu, J. J. Goater, E. M. Schwarz, and P. H. Wooley, “Adeno-associated virus-mediated osteoprotegerin gene transfer protects against particulate polyethylene-induced osteolysis in a murine model,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 2514–2523, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. X. Xiao, L. I. Juan, and R. J. Samulski, “Production of high-titer recombinant adeno-associated virus vectors in the absence of helper adenovirus,” Journal of Virology, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 2224–2232, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  25. P. Mukherjee, B. Wu, L. Mayton, S.-H. Kim, P. D. Robbins, and P. H. Wooley, “TNF receptor gene therapy results in suppression of IgG2a anticollagen antibody in collagen induced arthritis,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 62, no. 8, pp. 707–714, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. P. H. Wooley, J. Dutcher, M. B. Widmer, and S. Gillis, “Influence of a recombinant human soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor FC fusion protein on type II collagen-induced arthritis in mice,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 151, no. 11, pp. 6602–6607, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  27. P. H. Wooley, S. Petersen, Z. Song, and S. Nasser, “Cellular immune responses to orthopaedic implant materials following cemented total joint replacement,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 874–880, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. H. Wang, T.-H. Jia, N. Zacharias et al., “Combination gene therapy targeting on interleukin-1β and RANKL for wear debris-induced aseptic loosening,” Gene Therapy, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 128–135, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. P. H. Wooley, “Collagen-induced arthritis in the mouse,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 162, pp. 361–373, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  30. S. Yang, B. Wu, L. Mayton, C. H. Evans, P. D. Robbins, and P. H. Wooley, “IL-1Ra and vIL-10 gene transfer using retroviral vectors ameliorates particle-associated inflammation in the murine air pouch model,” Inflammation Research, vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 342–350, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  31. P. Geusens, “The role of RANK ligand/osteoprotegerin in rheumatoid arthritis,” Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 225–233, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. S. Xu, Y. Wang, J. Lu, and J. Xu, “Osteoprotegerin and RANKL in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis-induced osteoporosis,” Rheumatology International, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 1–7, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Qingguo Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1025 Views | 639 Downloads | 4 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder