Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
The Scientific World Journal
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 121760, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/121760
Research Article

Evaluation of the Inhibition of Carbohydrate Hydrolyzing Enzymes, the Antioxidant Activity, and the Polyphenolic Content of Citrus limetta Peel Extract

1Centro de Investigación y Asistencia en Tecnología y Diseño del Estado de Jalisco, A.C., Avenida Normalistas 800, Colinas de la Normal, 44270 Guadalajara, JAL, Mexico
2Department of Chemistry, Lagos State University, PMB 0001, Lasu Post Office, Ojo, Lagos, Nigeria
3Lancaster Medical School, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YG, UK

Received 1 August 2014; Revised 25 November 2014; Accepted 28 November 2014; Published 21 December 2014

Academic Editor: Walter Hunziker

Copyright © 2014 Eduardo Padilla-Camberos et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is one of the most frequent causes of death in Mexico, characterized by chronic hyperglycemia. One alternative strategy for this metabolic abnormality is inhibiting the enzymes responsible for the metabolism of carbohydrates. We evaluated whether the aqueous Citrus limetta peel extract could inhibit the metabolism of carbohydrates. We found that this extract inhibited primarily the enzyme α-amylase by 49.6% at a concentration of 20 mg/mL and to a lesser extent the enzyme α-glucosidase with an inhibition of 28.2% at the same concentration. This inhibition is likely due to the high polyphenol content in the Citrus limetta peel (19.1 mg GAE/g). Antioxidant activity of the Citrus limetta peel demonstrated dose-dependent antioxidant activity, varying from 6.5% at 1.125 mg/mL to 42.5% at 20 mg/mL. The study of these polyphenolic compounds having both antihyperglycemic and antioxidant activities may provide a new approach to the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

1. Introduction

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a metabolic disorder, characterized by hyperglycemia and by disturbances in the metabolism of fat and protein, resulting from defects in insulin secretion and/or insulin action [1]. Type 2 DM or noninsulin dependent DM is the most frequent form with 90–95% of DM cases [2]. Currently, Mexico ranks ninth in prevalence of type 2 DM [3, 4]. Several studies have been conducted to elucidate the possible biochemical mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of type 2 DM, but the exact mechanism is still unclear. Hyperglycemia, one of the main characteristics of type 2 DM, is considered the main cause of complications from diabetes [5]. Several pharmacological approaches have been used to improve diabetes treatment through different modes of action including stimulating insulin release, inhibiting gluconeogenesis, increasing the number of glucose transporters, and reducing glucose absorption from the intestine [2], which is achieved with enzyme inhibitors such as acarbose, voglibose, and miglitol [6]. Gastrointestinal side effects make pharmacological approaches less attractive as therapeutic agents, which makes natural remedies viable alternatives [7]. Previous studies have shown that the ability to inhibit enzymes is responsible for carbohydrate metabolism by different natural compounds [5]. Over 200 pure bioactive compounds isolated from plants have shown the effect of reducing blood glucose [8], several of which are polyphenolic compounds [9]. Citrus limetta, commonly known as sweet lime, is an edible fruit from Central America [10]. It is small, between oval and spherical, with a greenish yellow peel, rich in polyphenols, flavonoids, flavanones, and flavones [11]. This fruit is typically used for human consumption, and it has also been used for cholesterol control and inflammation regulation as well as digestive disorders and as a modulator of blood pressure [12]. Citrus limetta is comprised of 8–10% peel, which generally is a byproduct without any use, becoming an environmental problem [13]. Recent studies have shown interest in the possible beneficial effects of foods rich in polyphenols [14], which have different activities, among the most interesting of which are carbohydrate metabolism by inhibiting the α-glucosidase and α-amylase enzymes responsible for carbohydrate digestion [15], avoiding the chronic hyperglycemia symptoms that characterize type 2 DM.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material

Citrus limetta was purchased in Jalisco, Mexico. The peel was dried at 37°C, then ground and sieved (300 μm), and packaged until use. Citrus limetta peel extract. 0.5 g sample was homogenized in 25 mL of distilled water and then filtered on Whatman 40 to remove particles. The obtained sample was placed in an amber bottle and kept at 4°C until use.

2.2. Total Polyphenolic Assay

Total phenolic content was determined using Folin-Ciocalteu method [16]. 15 μL of extract sample at different concentrations (20, 10, 5, 2.5, and 1.125 mg/mL) was mixed with 750 μL of 0.2 M Folin-Ciocalteu reagent and 600 μL of 7.5% sodium carbonate. The absorbance was measured at 765 nm after incubation in the dark for 2 hours. Gallic acid was used as standard. The total polyphenol content was expressed as milligrams of gallic acid equivalents (GAE) per gram of the sample.

2.3. Antioxidant Activity

Antioxidant activity was evaluated by the 2,2-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) method [17]. 20 μL of the extract was mixed at different concentrations (20, 10, 5, 2.5, and 1.125 mg/mL), with 200 μL of 36 μM DPPH in 80% methanol and then was incubated in the dark for 30 min. The absorbance was measured at 515 nm. Ascorbic acid at 300 μg/mL was used as standard. The total antioxidant activity (%TAA) was expressed as the percentage inhibition of DPPH radical and determined with the following equation: where %TAA is antioxidant activity and Abs is absorbance.

2.4. α-Glucosidase Inhibition Essay

Inhibition of α-glucosidase enzyme was determined colorimetrically by monitoring the release of 4-nitrophenol from 4-nitrophenyl-α-D-glucopyranoside (pNPG) [18]. 50 μL of extract at different concentrations (20, 10, 5, 2.5, and 1.125 mg/mL) was preincubated with 100 μL of α-glucosidase enzyme (1 U/mL) (Sigma Aldrich). The reaction was carried out by adding 50 μL pNPG followed by 30 minutes incubation at 25°C. Acarbose was used as standard. Phosphate buffer was used as blank. The inhibition percentage was determined with the following equation: where is absorbance of control at minute 5, is absorbance of control at minute 0, is absorbance of sample at minute 5, and is absorbance of sample at minute 0.

2.5. α-Amylase Inhibition Essay

250 μL of sample at different concentrations (20, 10, 5, 2.5, and 1.125 mg/mL) was preincubated with 250 μL of α-amylase enzyme (2 U/mL) (Sigma Aldrich); then 250 μL of 1% starch was added and the sample was incubated at 25°C for 10 minutes. The reaction was stopped by adding 500 μL 3,5-Dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS). The sample was immediately incubated in a water bath at 95°C for 5 minutes and then was cooled to room temperature and 5 mL of distilled water was added. Acarbose was used as standard and phosphate buffer as blank. The absorbance was measured at 540 nm. The inhibition percentage was determined with the following equation: where Abs is the absorbance.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were executed in triplicate and the data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical comparisons were performed by one-way analysis of variance followed by Least Significant Difference () using Statgraphics XVI software.

3. Results

3.1. Total Polyphenolic Content

The Citrus limetta extract showed a total phenolic content of  mg GAE/g in a sample concentration 20 mg/mL.

3.2. Antioxidant Activity

The Citrus limetta extract showed high antioxidant activity and was dose-dependent (Figure 1). The activity was 42.5, 29.1, 18.6, 8.1, and 6.5% at concentrations of 20, 10, 5, 2.5, and 1.125 mg/mL, respectively (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Antioxidant activity at different concentrations of Citrus limetta peel extract. Data mean ± S.D. are plotted (). Ascorbic acid (AcAsc) at 300 μg/mL was used as standard.
3.3. α-Glucosidase Inhibition

The enzymatic activity of α-glucosidase was inhibited by all concentrations of the Citrus limetta peel extract. The inhibition was in a dose-dependent manner. The activity was 28.2, 21.0, 16.6, 14.5, and 5.2% at concentrations of 20, 10, 5, 2.5, and 1.125 mg/mL, respectively (Figure 2).

Figure 2: α-Glucosidase inhibition at different concentrations of Citrus limetta peel extract. Data mean ± S.D. are plotted (). Acarbose was used as standard.
3.4. α-Amylase Inhibition

The enzymatic activity of α-amylase was inhibited by the Citrus limetta extract by 49.6, 45.3, 42.8, 40.6, and 40.1% at concentrations of 20, 10, 5, 2.5, and 1.125, respectively (Figure 3).

Figure 3: α-Amylase inhibition at different concentrations of Citrus limetta peel extract. Data mean ± S.D. are plotted ().

4. Discussion

Hyperglycemia is a metabolic abnormality common in the people with type 2 DM. Hyperglycemia is characterized by increased levels of glucose in the blood; thus it is essential to maintain the glucose levels close to normal [19]. The enzyme α-amylase is an endoglucanase that hydrolyzes polysaccharides, and α-glucosidase is located in the membrane of the surface of the edge in brush of intestinal cells [20, 21]. These enzymes are key for digestion and carbohydrates absorption, thus regulating the glucose levels in blood [2].

In this study, we evaluated the ability of Citrus limetta peel extract to inhibit the enzymatic activity of α-glucosidase and α-amylase and observed a positive correlation between the total content of polyphenols and enzymatic activity. The dose-dependent relationships suggest that polyphenols of the Citrus limetta extract are partly responsible for the inhibition of the enzymatic activity.

Some studies have shown the power with which polyphenols inhibit activities of α-glucosidase and α-amylase [22, 23]. Flavonoids weakly inhibit α-glucosidase, though they are often potent inhibitors of α-amylase [22]. This coincides with our obtained results because Citrus limetta peel extract was a weak inhibitor of α-glucosidase activity but a potent inhibitor of the enzymatic activity of α-amylase. This difference could be due to different polyphenols present in the extract.

The polyphenolic compounds may also be indirectly beneficial to DM by the chelating metallic ions [24] or by activating the antioxidant enzyme expression [25]. A high total content of polyphenols is not always translated to a high antioxidant activity. The antioxidant activity appears depending on the position and degree of hydroxylation and conjugation [26].

It has been found that peels are the main sources of polyphenols from fruits [27], since these participate in purification of free radicals and may be involved in the inhibition of enzymatic activity [16].

According to the results obtained at different concentrations, we observed that the antioxidant and inhibitory activity of the enzymes which hydrolyze carbohydrates depends on the concentration of polyphenols present in the Citrus limetta peel extract.

5. Conclusion

The aqueous extract of Citrus limetta peel showed a potent inhibition of the enzymatic activity of α-glucosidase and α-amylase, which could be related to the polyphenol content. However, further studies are required using polyphenolic isolated compounds, as well as studies in vivo. The results give the possibility that the peel of Citrus limetta, which is generally discarded, becoming an ecological problem, could be exploited for use as an alternative for the control of hyperglycemia in people with type 2 DM.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they do not have any conflict of interests.

References

  1. C. C. Teixeira, C. A. Rava, P. Mallman da Silva et al., “Absence of antihyperglycemic effect of jambolan in experimental and clinical models,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 71, no. 1-2, pp. 343–347, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. O. O. Olaokun, L. J. McGaw, J. N. Eloff, and V. Naidoo, “Evaluation of the inhibition of carbohydrate hydrolysing enzymes, antioxidant activity and polyphenolic content of extracts of ten African Ficus species (Moraceae) used traditionally to treat diabetes,” BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 13, article 94, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. Wild, G. Roglic, A. Verde, R. Sicree, and H. el Rey, “La prevalencia global de la diabetes: las estimaciones para el año 2000 y las proyecciones para 2030,” Diabetes Care, vol. 27, pp. 1047–1053, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  4. A. Arredondo and E. de Icaza, “Costos de la diabetes en Amerŕica Latina: evidencias del Caso Mexicano,” Value in Health, vol. 14, no. 5, supplement, pp. S85–S88, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. C. M. Picot, A. H. Subratty, and M. F. Mahomoodally, “Inhibitory potential of five traditionally used native antidiabetic medicinal plants on α-amylase, α-glucosidase, glucose entrapment, and amylolysis kinetics in vitro,” Advances in Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 2014, Article ID 739834, 7 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J.-Y. Youn, H.-Y. Park, and K.-H. Cho, “Anti-hyperglycemic activity of Commelina communis L.: inhibition of α-glucosidase,” Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, vol. 66, pp. S149–S155, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. Y.-M. Kim, Y.-K. Jeong, M.-H. Wang, W.-Y. Lee, and H.-I. Rhee, “Inhibitory effect of pine extract on α-glucosidase activity and postprandial hyperglycemia,” Nutrition, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 756–761, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. R. A. DeFronzo, “Pharmacologic therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 131, no. 4, pp. 281–303, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. R. Habasa-Lhoret and J. L. Chiasson, “α-glucosidase inhibitors,” in International Textbook of Diabetes Mellitus, R. A. Defronzo, E. Ferrannini, H. Keen, and P. Zimmet, Eds., vol. 1, pp. 901–914, John Wiley & Sons, London, UK, 3rd edition, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  10. Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera (SIAP), Producción Agrícolaporestado, Cíclicosy Perennes, Modalidad: Riego + Temporal, SIAP México, 2012.
  11. G.-N. Kim, J.-G. Shin, and H.-D. Jang, “Antioxidant and antidiabetic activity of Dangyuja (Citrus grandis Osbeck) extract treated with Aspergillus saitoi,” Food Chemistry, vol. 117, no. 1, pp. 35–41, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. Kundusen, P. Saha, S. Bhattacharya et al., “Evaluation of in vitro antioxidant activity of Citrus limetta and Citrus maxima on reactive oxygen and nitrogen species,” Pharmacologyonline, vol. 3, pp. 850–857, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. Fernández-López, J. M. Fernández-Ginés, L. Aleson-Carbonell, E. Sendra, E. Sayas-Barberá, and J. A. Pérez-Alvarez, “Application of functional citrus by-products to meat products,” Trends in Food Science and Technology, vol. 15, no. 3-4, pp. 176–185, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. A. Scalbert and G. Williamson, “Dietary intake and bioavailability of polyphenols,” Journal of Nutrition, vol. 130, no. 8, pp. 2073S–2085S, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. K. Johnston, P. Sharp, M. Clifford, and L. Morgan, “Dietary polyphenols decrease glucose uptake by human intestinal Caco-2 cells,” FEBS Letters, vol. 579, no. 7, pp. 1653–1657, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. Ş. Gözlekçi, O. Saraçoǧlu, E. Onursal, and M. Özgen, “Total phenolic distribution of juice, peel, and seed extracts of four pomegranate cultivars,” Pharmacognosy Magazine, vol. 7, no. 26, pp. 161–164, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. T. Kuljarachanan, S. Devahastin, and N. Chiewchan, “Evolution of antioxidant compounds in lime residues during drying,” Food Chemistry, vol. 113, no. 4, pp. 944–949, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. I. Kazeem, J. V. Ogunbiyi, and A. O. T. Ashafa, “In vitro studies on the inhibition of α-amylase and α-glucosidase by leaf extracts of Picralima nitida (Stapf),” Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 719–725, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. K. Tiwari and J. M. Rao, “Diabetes mellitus and multiple therapeutic approaches of phytochemicals: present status and future prospects,” Current Science, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 30–38, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. W. Hunziker, M. Spiess, G. Semenza, and H. F. Lodish, “The sucrase-isomaltase complex: primary structure, membrane-orientation, and evolution of a stalked, intrinsic brush border protein,” Cell, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 227–234, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A. Bougatef, M. Hajji, R. Balti, I. Lassoued, Y. Triki-Ellouz, and M. Nasri, “Antioxidant and free radical-scavenging activities of smooth hound (Mustelus mustelus) muscle protein hydrolysates obtained by gastrointestinal proteases,” Food Chemistry, vol. 114, no. 4, pp. 1198–1205, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. G. J. McDougall, F. Shpiro, P. Dobson, P. Smith, A. Blake, and D. Stewart, “Different polyphenolic components of soft fruits inhibit α-amylase and α-glycosidase,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 53, no. 7, pp. 2760–2766, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. K. Tadera, Y. Minami, K. Takamatsu, and T. Matsuoka, “Inhibition of α-glucosidase and α-amylase by flavonoids,” Journal of Nutritional Science and Vitaminology, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 149–153, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. E. Brown, H. Khodr, R. C. Hider, and C. A. Rice-Evans, “Structural dependence of flavonoid interactions with Cu2+ ions: implications for their antioxidant properties,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 330, no. 3, pp. 1173–1178, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. C. A. Rice-Evans, N. J. Miller, and G. Paganga, “Structure-antioxidant activity relationships of flavonoids and phenolic acids,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 933–956, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. R. Pulido, L. Bravo, and F. Saura-Calixto, “Antioxidant activity of dietary polyphenols as determined by a modified ferric reducing/antioxidant power assay,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 3396–3402, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. A. Jiménez-Escrig, M. Rincón, R. Pulido, and F. Saura-Calixto, “Guava fruit (Psidium guajava L.) as a new source of antioxidant dietary fiber,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 49, no. 11, pp. 5489–5493, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus